What can we learn from X‐ray fluorescence core scanning data? A paleo‐monsoon case study.

Gebregiorgis, Daniel, Giosan, L., Hathorne, Ed C. , Anand, P., Nilsson‐Kerr, K., Plass, Anna, Lückge, A., Clemens, S.C. and Frank, Martin (2020) What can we learn from X‐ray fluorescence core scanning data? A paleo‐monsoon case study. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21 (2). e2019GC008414. DOI 10.1029/2019GC008414.

[img] Text
Gebregiorgis.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Registered users only until 20 June 2020.

Download (3672Kb) | Contact
[img] Text
Gebregiorgis_et_al-2020-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only until 1 September 2020.

Download (6Mb) | Contact

Supplementary data:


Key Points

Calibration of XRF core scanning data highlights the need for careful examination of sediment properties such as porosity/water
Grain size and water content in the sediment trigger systematic artifacts in the signal intensity of light elements (e.g. Si and Al)
Known terrigenous flux proxies (e.g Ti/Ca, Fe/Ca) are influenced by sea level variations

X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) core scanning of marine and lake sediments has been extensively used to study changes in past environmental and climatic processes over a range of timescales. The interpretation of XRF‐derived element ratios in paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic studies primarily considers differences in the relative abundances of particular elements. Here we present new XRF core scanning data from two long sediment cores in the Andaman Sea in the northern Indian Ocean and show that sea level related processes influence terrigenous inputs based proxies such as Ti/Ca, Fe/Ca, and elemental concentrations of the transition metals (e.g. Mn). Zr/Rb ratios are mainly a function of changes in median grain size of lithogenic particles and often covary with changes in Ca concentrations that reflect changes in biogenic calcium carbonate production. This suggests that a common process (i.e. sea level) influences both records. The interpretation of lighter element data (e.g. Si and Al) based on low XRF counts is complicated as variations in mean grain size and water content result in systematic artifacts and signal intensities not related to the Al or Si content of the sediments. This highlights the need for calibration of XRF core scanning data based on discrete sample analyses and careful examination of sediment properties such as porosity/water content for reliably disentangling environmental signals from other physical properties. In the case of the Andaman Sea, reliable extraction of a monsoon signal will require accounting for the sea level influence on the XRF data.

Document Type: Article
Keywords: XRF core scanning data, terrigenous flux proxies
Research affiliation: OceanRep > GEOMAR > FB2 Marine Biogeochemistry > FB2-MG Marine Geosystems
Woods Hole
OceanRep > GEOMAR > FB1 Ocean Circulation and Climate Dynamics > FB1-P-OZ Paleo-Oceanography
Refereed: Yes
Open Access Journal?: No
DOI etc.: 10.1029/2019GC008414
ISSN: 1525-2027
Date Deposited: 13 Jan 2020 10:19
Last Modified: 09 Mar 2020 09:18
URI: http://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/48734

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...