Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models.

Reintges, Annika , Martin, Thomas , Latif, Mojib and Keenlyside, Noel S. (2017) Uncertainty in twenty-first century projections of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. Open Access Climate Dynamics, 49 (5-6). pp. 1495-1511. DOI 10.1007/s00382-016-3180-x.

[thumbnail of art_10.1007_s00382-016-3180-x.pdf] Text
art_10.1007_s00382-016-3180-x.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (6MB) | Contact
[thumbnail of 382_2016_3180_MOESM1_ESM.docx] Text
382_2016_3180_MOESM1_ESM.docx - Supplemental Material
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (1MB) | Contact
[thumbnail of Reintges_et_al_2017_Uncertainty_ClimDyn_accepted.pdf]
Reintges_et_al_2017_Uncertainty_ClimDyn_accepted.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (2MB) | Preview

Supplementary data:


Uncertainty in the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is analyzed in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5) projections for the twenty-first century; and the different sources of uncertainty (scenario, internal and model) are quantified. Although the uncertainty in future projections of the AMOC index at 30°N is larger in CMIP5 than in CMIP3, the signal-to-noise ratio is comparable during the second half of the century and even larger in CMIP5 during the first half. This is due to a stronger AMOC reduction in CMIP5. At lead times longer than a few decades, model uncertainty dominates uncertainty in future projections of AMOC strength in both the CMIP3 and CMIP5 model ensembles. Internal variability significantly contributes only during the first few decades, while scenario uncertainty is relatively small at all lead times. Model uncertainty in future changes in AMOC strength arises mostly from uncertainty in density, as uncertainty arising from wind stress (Ekman transport) is negligible. Finally, the uncertainty in changes in the density originates mostly from the simulation of salinity, rather than temperature. High-latitude freshwater flux and the subpolar gyre projections were also analyzed, because these quantities are thought to play an important role for the future AMOC changes. The freshwater input in high latitudes is projected to increase and the subpolar gyre is projected to weaken. Both the freshening and the gyre weakening likely influence the AMOC by causing anomalous salinity advection into the regions of deep water formation. While the high model uncertainty in both parameters may explain the uncertainty in the AMOC projection, deeper insight into the mechanisms for AMOC is required to reach a more quantitative conclusion.

Document Type: Article
Funder compliance: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/603521; info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/308299
Keywords: Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC); North Atlantic Ocean; Climate change uncertainty; Climate projections;
Research affiliation: OceanRep > GEOMAR > FB1 Ocean Circulation and Climate Dynamics > FB1-ME Maritime Meteorology
Refereed: Yes
Open Access Journal?: No
Publisher: Springer
Projects: RACE, NACLIM, Emmy Noether Program, ERC, EPOCASA, PREFACE
Date Deposited: 10 Jun 2016 10:13
Last Modified: 06 Feb 2020 09:13
URI: https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/33059

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item