What can we learn from X‐ray fluorescence core scanning data? A paleo‐monsoon case study.

Gebregiorgis, Daniel, Giosan, L., Hathorne, Ed C. , Anand, P., Nilsson‐Kerr, K., Plass, Anna, Lückge, A., Clemens, S.C. and Frank, Martin (2020) What can we learn from X‐ray fluorescence core scanning data? A paleo‐monsoon case study. Open Access Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21 (2). e2019GC008414. DOI 10.1029/2019GC008414.

[thumbnail of Gebregiorgis.pdf]
Preview
Text
Gebregiorgis.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (3MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Gebregiorgis_et_al-2020-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf]
Preview
Text
Gebregiorgis_et_al-2020-Geochemistry,_Geophysics,_Geosystems.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0.

Download (7MB) | Preview

Supplementary data:

Abstract

Key Points

Calibration of XRF core scanning data highlights the need for careful examination of sediment properties such as porosity/water
Grain size and water content in the sediment trigger systematic artifacts in the signal intensity of light elements (e.g. Si and Al)
Known terrigenous flux proxies (e.g Ti/Ca, Fe/Ca) are influenced by sea level variations

X‐ray fluorescence (XRF) core scanning of marine and lake sediments has been extensively used to study changes in past environmental and climatic processes over a range of timescales. The interpretation of XRF‐derived element ratios in paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic studies primarily considers differences in the relative abundances of particular elements. Here we present new XRF core scanning data from two long sediment cores in the Andaman Sea in the northern Indian Ocean and show that sea level related processes influence terrigenous inputs based proxies such as Ti/Ca, Fe/Ca, and elemental concentrations of the transition metals (e.g. Mn). Zr/Rb ratios are mainly a function of changes in median grain size of lithogenic particles and often covary with changes in Ca concentrations that reflect changes in biogenic calcium carbonate production. This suggests that a common process (i.e. sea level) influences both records. The interpretation of lighter element data (e.g. Si and Al) based on low XRF counts is complicated as variations in mean grain size and water content result in systematic artifacts and signal intensities not related to the Al or Si content of the sediments. This highlights the need for calibration of XRF core scanning data based on discrete sample analyses and careful examination of sediment properties such as porosity/water content for reliably disentangling environmental signals from other physical properties. In the case of the Andaman Sea, reliable extraction of a monsoon signal will require accounting for the sea level influence on the XRF data.

Document Type: Article
Keywords: XRF core scanning data, terrigenous flux proxies
Research affiliation: OceanRep > GEOMAR > FB2 Marine Biogeochemistry > FB2-MG Marine Geosystems
OceanRep > GEOMAR > FB1 Ocean Circulation and Climate Dynamics > FB1-P-OZ Paleo-Oceanography
Woods Hole
Refereed: Yes
Open Access Journal?: No
Publisher: AGU (American Geophysical Union), Wiley
Date Deposited: 13 Jan 2020 10:19
Last Modified: 08 Feb 2023 09:38
URI: https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/48734

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item