Cost_ID,Repository,Reference_ID,Reference_title,Authors,Abstract,Publication_year,Language,Type_of_material,Previous_materials,Availability,Kingdom,Phylum,Class,Order,Family,Genus,Species,Subspecies,Common_name,Environment,Environment_IAS,Island,HabitatVerbatim,Habitat,protectedArea,Geographic_region,Official_country,State|Province|Administrative_area,Location,Spatial_scale,Period_of_estimation,Time_range,Probable_starting_year,Probable_ending_year,Probable_starting_year_adjusted,Probable_ending_year_adjusted,Occurrence,Raw_cost_estimate_local_currency,Min_Raw_cost_estimate_local_currency,Max_Raw_cost_estimate_local_currency,Raw_cost_estimate_2017_USD_exchange_rate,Raw_cost_estimate_2017_USD_PPP,Cost_estimate_per_year_local_currency,Cost_estimate_per_year_2017_USD_exchange_rate,Cost_estimate_per_year_2017_USD_PPP,Currency,Applicable_year,Type_of_applicable_year,Implementation,Acquisition_method,Impacted_sector,Type_of_cost,Type_of_cost_merged,Management_type,Method_reliability,Method_reliability_refined,Method_reliability_Explanation,Method_reliability_Expert_Name,Overlap,Benefit_value(s),Details,Initial contributors_names,Double-checking
1,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,17500000,,,16701772.13,16638296.49,17500000,16701772.13,16638296.49,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Key loss is lamb predation. ABARE (2003) estimate 35 million lambs marked per year. Assumed 2% of all lambs marked are taken by foxes at a cost of $25 per head. See Saunders et al. (1997) for background of lamb predation,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
2,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,190000000,,,181333526,180644361.8,190000000,181333526,180644361.8,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Following the methodology in Pimentel et al. (2000), the impact of fox predation on the bird population in Australia is valued. (each bird valued 1$)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
3,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Tasmania,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,16000000,,,15270191.66,15212156.79,16000000,15270191.66,15212156.79,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Fox control expenditure in Tasmania of $9 million per year is also included (Tasmanian Dept. of Primary Industries, Water and Environment estimate). Original document not found
--> J'ai remi McLeod en auteur , mais sinon le vrai auteur serai le Tasman Departmen (mais pas trouvé) ?",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
11,TC,559,The economic benefits of rabbit control in Australian temperate pastures by the introduction of rabbit haemorrhagic disease,Vere et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,"McLeod, R. (2004). Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia, 2004. Canberra. Retrieved from https://www.pestsmart.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/CountingTheCost.pdf",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,22900000,7100000,38700000,21855461.81,21772399.4,22900000,21855461.81,21772399.4,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Prior to the release of RHDV : Rabbits impose annual costs on wool producers in the temperate pasture areas of between 7.1 and 38.7 million Australian dollars (mA$) depending on their density,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
17,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,88110000,,,84091036.7,83771445.91,88110000,84091036.7,83771445.91,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Agricultural production losses are included in this cost component. The gross margin per sheep or head of cattle sold is multiplied by the numbers in each region and the estimated reduced carrying capacity estimates. ABARE (2003) farm level statistic have been utilised to calculated production loss values (sheep $35.4 M + cattle $34.39 M + cropping industries $18.39 M),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
24,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus spp.,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,48300000,,,46096891.07,45921698.3,48300000,46096891.07,45921698.3,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Assumed 0.5% of all sheep (71.2 million) are taken by dogs at a cost of $30 per head. Range of studies in Fleming et al (2001) by NERDA (1966), Schaefer (1981), Fleming and Korn (1989) and Fleming (Unpublished) indicate dog predation losses of 0.8-1.33%. Conservative loss estimate included for all of Australia. In total, ABARE (2003) estimate 5.4 million sheep deaths in 2003. Given the assumptions used in this analysis, dogs account for 16% of deaths.
Calves are most susceptible to dog predation (Fleming et al. 2001). Eldridge and Bryan (1995) estimated between 1.6-7.1% of calves in the Northern Territory subject to dog predation. For the whole of Australia it is assumed that 1% of calves are killed by dogs. Using a per head value of $540 (Eldridge and Bryan, 1995) and about 6 million calves in Australia (ABS, 2003), a total calf cost of $32.4 million per year is estimated.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
25,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Mus,Mus musculus,,House mouse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,23110000,,,22055883.08,21972058.96,23110000,22055883.08,21972058.96,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Agricultural losses. In the 1993 plague, $58.9 million in losses were realised (Caughley et al. 1994). Given that a plague (of 1993 order) is assumed to occur every 10 years in each of the four key mouse- prone production regions, the annual cost of rodents to grain farmers – in any one year – is estimated to be $24.4 million. Of this total cost, $22.79 million is estimated to be production losses. Based on information from the phone survey, the mouse plague inflicted losses of $0.8 million, which included $0.03 million for baits (Caughley et al. 1994). Given that a plague (of 1993 order) is assumed to occur every 10 years in each of the four key mouse-prone production region, the annual cost of mice to other farmers – in any one year – is estimated to be $0.32 million.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
30,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,4230000,,,4037056.92,4021713.951,4230000,4037056.92,4021713.951,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Agricultural production losses are included in this cost component. The gross margin per sheep or head of cattle sold is multiplied by the numbers in each region and the estimated reduced carrying capacity estimates. ABARE (2003) farm level statistic have been used to calculated production loss values
The methodology is shortly presented at the begining of the paper, but no details on cost calculations or sources.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
33,TC,409,Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Goats,Parkes et al,,1996,English,Official report,"Bomford, M., & Hart, Q. (2002). NON-INDIGENOUS VERTEBRATES IN AUSTRALIA, 1–23.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1996,Year,1996,Unspecified,1996,1996,Potentially ongoing,17800000,,,21768528.87,21203317.61,17800000,21768528.87,21203317.61,AUD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Update from Henzell 1989. Net loss caused by reduced stock production : 
The net cost of the present population of feral goats to sheep production has been estimated (Henzell 1989) by assuming the extent of competition, contingent costs or benefits if goat populations are changing, and the net income from mustering goats and profits from sheep. All these factors vary in space and time but updating Henzell’s (1989) calculations for South Australia gives an estimate of a net average cost per feral goat to sheep graziers of $8.15 per goat (Appendix A).The total average annual loss to sheep production due to feral goats in Australia is estimated to be about $17.8 million (Appendix A). ==> Appendix A is not available !!",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
35,TC,409,Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Goats,Parkes et al,,1996,English,Official report,"Bomford, M., & Hart, Q. (2002). NON-INDIGENOUS VERTEBRATES IN AUSTRALIA, 1–23.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1993,Year,1993,Unspecified,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,1145000,,,1400278.964,1363921.273,1145000,1400278.964,1363921.273,AUD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Direct cost expended by government agencies on goat control operations : ""In Western Australia, about $800 000 per year has been spent supporting feral goat control operations between 1991-92 and 1994-95. The Animal and Plant Control Commission and local Soil Boards in South Australia spent about $170 000 in 1992 on grants, research, and extension work to manage feral goats. Queensland spent about $175 000 0n goat control and related activities in 1994.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
36,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Perissodactyla,Equidae,Equus,Equus caballus,,Wild Horse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,500000,,,477193.4894,475379.8996,500000,477193.4894,475379.8996,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research cost estimate, based on those for other species in Bomford and Hart (2002), Control costs (research)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
37,TC,2,Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia,McLeod,,2004,English,Official report,"Rolfe, J., & Windle, J. (2014). Public preferences for controlling an invasive species in public and private spaces. Land Use Policy, 41, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.04.013",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Camelidae,Camelus,Camelus dromedarius,,Dromedary camel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,210000,,,200421.2655,199659.5578,210000,200421.2655,199659.5578,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Feral Camels impact : sheep production loss ($0.05M) + Cattle production loss ($0.16M)
""See ABARE (2003) for regional definitions. Numbers of livestock, cropping areas and gross margin estimates are outlined in the Appendix. Regions includes 511, 711 and 411""
Appendix : no link with feral camels",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
38,TC,412,Managing Vertebrate Pests: Rodents. Canberra: Bureau of Resource Sciences,?Caughley et al,,1998,English,Book chapter,"McLeod, R. (2004). Counting the Cost: Impact of Invasive Animals in Australia, 2004. Canberra. Retrieved from https://www.pestsmart.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/CountingTheCost.pdf",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,2833956.808,3469948.704,3000000,2833956.808,3469948.704,AUD,1998,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Black rats cause losses as high as 30% in macadamia orchards in some years, equivalent to around 100 tonnes or $350 000 worth of nuts on some individual farms. 

Annual average losses are probably around 5% so at this level of damage the total national damage is of the order of $3 million per year 
(Caughley, J., Bomford, M., Parker, B., Sinclair, R., Griffiths, J., and Kelly, D., Managing Vertebrate Pests: Rodents. Bureau of Resource Sciences, Canberra, 1998.)

The figures presented for agricultural damage costs are based on extrapolations of government agency estimates, landholder surveys and other information referenced in the text.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
39,WoS,12049,Population control of coypu Myocastor coypus in Italy compared to eradication in UK: a cost-benefit analysis,Panzacchi et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Unspecified,Country,1995-2000,Period,1995,2000,1995,2000,One-time,935138,,,1515087.236,1364559.941,155856.3333,252514.5394,227426.6568,EUR,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"During 1995-2000,the overall damage caused by the rodents reached a total of € 935,138 => damage to agriculture. Results from a survey",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
40,WoS,12049,Population control of coypu Myocastor coypus in Italy compared to eradication in UK: a cost-benefit analysis,Panzacchi et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Unspecified,Country,1995-2000,Period,1995,2000,1995,2000,One-time,2614408,,,3987895.246,3076828.693,435734.6667,664649.2077,512804.7822,EUR,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"During 1995-2000, € 2,614,408 were spent on removing 220,688 coypus. Results from as survey",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
42,WoS,12049,Population control of coypu Myocastor coypus in Italy compared to eradication in UK: a cost-benefit analysis,Panzacchi et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,East Anglia,Site,1981-1992,Period,1981,1992,1981,1992,One-time,5000000,,,8100875.145,8326222.256,416666.6667,675072.9288,693851.8547,EUR,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Comparison of eradication in Italy with Est ANglian (succesfull eradication in the UK).
""The successful 11-year eradi cation campaign in East Anglia (Gosling & Baker 1989, S. Baker, pers. comm.) --> value not found in Gosling & Baker 1989, must come from Baker pers com",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
43,WoS,13502,Damage reduction estimates and benefit-cost ratios for feral swine control from the last remnant of a basin marsh system in Florida,Engeman et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Florida (Savannas Preserve State Park) ,Unit (Park),2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,501110,235355,766865,650305.5205,650305.5205,501110,650305.5205,650305.5205,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The value of the damage in 2004 was US$235 355 (‘freshwater emergent’ valuation) andUS$766 865 (‘open-water emergent’ valuation). 
The value of the damage reduction from 2003 to 2004 was US$ 1 003 355 (‘freshwater emergent’ habitat category) and US$ 3 269 265 (‘open-water emergent’ habitat category).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
44,WoS,13502,Damage reduction estimates and benefit-cost ratios for feral swine control from the last remnant of a basin marsh system in Florida,Engeman et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Florida (Savannas Preserve State Park) ,Unit (Park),2003-2004,Year,2003,2004,2004,2004,One-time,2136310,1003355,3269265,2772353.748,2772353.748,2136310,2772353.748,2772353.748,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,NA,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
45,TC,548,The amount and economic cost of feral swine damage to the last remnant of a basinmarsh system in Florida,Engeman et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,"In Engeman, R. M., Smith, H. T., Severson, R., Severson, M. A., Woolard, J., Shwiff, S. A., … Griffin, D. (2004). Damage reduction estimates and benefit-cost ratios for feral swine control from the last remnant of a basin marsh system in Florida. Environmental Conservation, 31(3), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892904001572",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Florida (Savannas Preserve State Park) ,Unit (Park),2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,2637525,1238760,4036290,3310479.346,3310479.346,2637525,3310479.346,3310479.346,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Damage to marshlands : ""In 2003, the area of natural habitat damaged by swine had a total value of US$ 1 238 760?4 036 290"". 19% was damaged (5Ha). 
In January 2003, swine damaged 19% (5 ha) of the exposed marsh, which was valued at US$ 247 742–807 226 ha?1 (Engeman et al. 2005).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
46,WoS,13502,Damage reduction estimates and benefit-cost ratios for feral swine control from the last remnant of a basin marsh system in Florida,Engeman et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Florida (Savannas Preserve State Park) ,Unit (Park),2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,7500,,,9732.975602,9732.975602,7500,9732.975602,9732.975602,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Swine removal : Regional contract of 7500 US$
(if they count that money only for the 64 pigs in the parc it is 117$/pig, but if they count all the pigs in the suroundings, 33$/pigs)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
48,WoS,13819,Prevalence and economic value of feral swine damage to native habitat in three Florida state parks,Engeman et al,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),Late winter 2002/Spring 2002/mid-winter 2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,10307,5331,15283,13733.80319,13733.80319,10307,13733.80319,13733.80319,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Ajouter toutes les valeurs ou prendre les médianes ??            Economic evaluation of damages based on expenditure data for permitted wetland mitigation projects in the USA from King (1998). Two economic valuations : ""freshwater forested"" or ""emergent forested"" habitat. Damage variable according to the period of the year : Late winter 2002 (15283 - 29063), Spring 2002 (15283-29063),  mid-winter 2003(5331-10138). In Atlantic Ridge Preserve State Park",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
49,WoS,13819,Prevalence and economic value of feral swine damage to native habitat in three Florida state parks,Engeman et al,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),Late winter 2002/Spring 2002/mid-winter 2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,11907,4621,19193,15865.76061,15865.76061,11907,15865.76061,15865.76061,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Ajouter toutes les valeurs ou prendre les médianes ??          Economic evaluation of damages based on expenditure data for permitted wetland mitigation projects in the USA from King (1998). Two economic valuations : ""freshwater forested"" FF or ""emergent forested"" EF habitat. Damage variable according to the period of the year : Spring 2002 (4621 FF -8786 EF),  mid-winter 2003(19193 FF-36498 EF). In Jonathan Dickinson State Park",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
50,WoS,13819,Prevalence and economic value of feral swine damage to native habitat in three Florida state parks,Engeman et al,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),Late winter 2002/Spring 2002/mid-winter 2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,15994,9241,22747,21311.57934,21311.57934,15994,21311.57934,21311.57934,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Ajouter toutes les valeurs ou prendre les médianes ??          Economic evaluation of damages based on expenditure data for permitted wetland mitigation projects in the USA from King (1998). Two economic valuations : ""freshwater forested"" FF or ""emergent forested"" EF habitat. Damage variable according to the period of the year : Late winter 2002 (9241 FF-17573 EF) Spring 2002 (16705 FF - 31 767 EF),  mid-winter 2003(22747 FF- 43257 EF). In Savannas Preserve State Park",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
51,WoS,13819,Prevalence and economic value of feral swine damage to native habitat in three Florida state parks,Engeman et al,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,One-time,5305,,,7229.239136,7229.239136,5305,7229.239136,7229.239136,USD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""The additional cost to the park for that contract was approximately US$ 5000 (adjusting for inflation, US$ 5305 in 2002)""
Removal = control ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
64,TC,553,The cost of aerial baiting for wild dog management in north-eastern New South Wales. Australian Rangelands Journal 13: 47–56,Thompson and Fleming,,1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,"In Fleming, P. J. S., Corbett, L., Harden, R., & Thomson, P. (2001). Managing the impact of dingoes and other wild dogs. Canberra. Retrieved from http://www.lib.washington.edu/msd/norestriction/b63138219.pdf",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus spp.,Wild dogs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Northern Tablelands of New South Wales,Site,1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,152750,,,214154.0362,203909.2731,152750,214154.0362,203909.2731,AUD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,A survey of participants in the 1988 aerial baiting program on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales costed that single operation at $152 750,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
73,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,3500,,,3340.354426,3327.659297,3500,3340.354426,3327.659297,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of the fence material. 
Design testing : Fence 1 (pigs). Hone and Atkinson (1983) found this fence effectively contained four feral pigs in a 600 m2 enclosure during 100 hour trial periods when it was both electrified and non-electrified
all material described + cost detailled at the end of the document",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
75,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,3900,,,3722.109217,3707.963217,3900,3722.109217,3707.963217,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of the fence material.  This fence was developed by NSW Agriculture (Choquenot et al. 1996), however during this review we were unable to locate any data quantifying its success.
Electrified fence, 3900 A$/km. Design detailed with source, but not the cost
all material described + cost detailled at the end of the document",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
76,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Hunter Valley,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,4200,,,4008.425311,3993.191157,4200,4008.425311,3993.191157,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of the fence material. 
Feral goat fences, This design has not been formally tested but has proven effective in situ (S. Pratten pers. comm.). Cost of material, no details (only about the design)
all material described + cost detailled at the end of the document",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
77,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Hunter Valley,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,3400,,,3244.915728,3232.583317,3400,3244.915728,3232.583317,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of the fence material. 
Feral goat fences, Extent of use unknown. Cost of material, no details (only about the design)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
78,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,3850,3700,4000,3674.389868,3660.425227,3850,3674.389868,3660.425227,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of the fence material.  
Feral rabbit fences. Widely used throughout Australia to protect agricultural land and threatened vegetation communities from feral rabbits.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
79,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,6200,,,5917.199268,5894.710755,6200,5917.199268,5894.710755,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of the fence material. Fox fences. tested in situ and used,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
80,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Scotia Sanctuary ,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,6800,,,6489.831455,6465.166634,6800,6489.831455,6465.166634,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of the fence material. Fox fences. Previously used by Earth Sanctuaries Pty Ltd at Scotia Sanctuary (N.S.W.) to protect native wildlife,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
86,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus dingo,Dingo,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Muloorina Station,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,2900,,,2767.722238,2757.203418,2900,2767.722238,2757.203418,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of the fence material. Feral dogs + dingo,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
87,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus dingo,Dingo,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Muloorina Station,Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,4600,,,4390.180102,4373.495076,4600,4390.180102,4373.495076,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of the fence material. Feral dogs + dingo,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
88,TC,227,Cost effective feral animal exclusion fencing for areas of high conservation value in Australia - Part 2: Catalogue of fence designs,Long and Robley,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus dingo,Dingo,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Queensland (Northern Hairy-nosed wombat population range),Unit (Km),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,7200,6800,7600,6871.586247,6845.470554,7200,6871.586247,6845.470554,AUD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of the fence material. Feral dogs + dingo,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
90,WoS,6487,Interior fences can reduce cost and uncertainty when eradicating invasive species from large islands,Bode et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Faure Island,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,One-time,33700,,,35459.44961,25381.68911,33700,35459.44961,25381.68911,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Eradication of cats in Faure Island years before (5800 Ha)
Value ""corrected from inflation"", but no source given",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
93,WoS,13141,Effectiveness of coypu control in small Italian wetland areas,Bertolino et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,Y,Europe,Italy,,Natural Reserve of Valenza,Unit (Reserve),1998-2000,Year,1998,2000,1998,2000,One-time,1518,,,2370.379943,2228.072692,1518,2370.379943,2228.072692,EUR,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Includes workforce costs, transportation costs, amortization of durable materials and consumable materials.
 (1518 €= 1 867 US$) ""Overall  cost was 4,553 Euros (5,600 U.S. dollars), corresponding to a mean of 1,518 Euros (1,867 U.S. dol- lars) per year and 66.96 Euros (82.36 U.S. dollars)  per coypu removed.
Annual (3 years 1998-2000 included)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
99,WoS,16689,"The eradication of introduced Australian brushtail possums, Trichosurus vulpecula, from Kapiti Island, a New Zealand nature reserve",Cowan,,1992,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Kapiti Island,Site,1980-1987,Period,1980,1987,1980,1987,One-time,850000,,,1082096.207,1247307.411,106250,135262.0259,155913.4264,NZD,1987,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Total direct costs between 1980 and 1987 amounted to about NZ $850 000 (in 1987 dollars), of which less than NZ $50 000 was spent catching the first 11 500 possums and about NZ $220 000 the last 80",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
100,WoS,13836,From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands,Towns and Broome,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Korapuki Island,Unit (Ha),1986,Year,1986,1986,1986,1986,One-time,198,,,231.4451821,332.2524605,198,231.4451821,332.2524605,NZD,1986,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"/!\ cost had declined at completion of the campaign, may not be throughout the campaign
Costs had declined to $198/ha when the Korapuki Island campaign was completed in 1986",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
101,WoS,13836,From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands,Towns and Broome,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Mercury Island,Unit (Ha),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,366,,,283.192324,325.7041281,366,283.192324,325.7041281,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"/!\ in early phases of the campaigns only
The costs of aerial spread operations reached $366/ha in the early phases of the Mercury Islands campaigns",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
102,WoS,13836,From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands,Towns and Broome,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tuhua,Unit (Ha),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,114,,,88.20744517,101.4488268,114,88.20744517,101.4488268,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Williams and Jones, 2003, Personnal communication] The costs of aerial spread operations: $ 114/ha by the Tuhua Island campaign, involving cats and two species of rats.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
103,TC,489,"Rats eradicated from rugged Breaksea Island (170 ha), Fiordland, New Zealand",Towns and Broome,,1993,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348?needAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Breaksea Island,Site,21 days (1988),Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,82117,,,91906.72071,100178.4704,82117,91906.72071,100178.4704,NZD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Table 3.total cost 82117 1990 NZD ""The campaign was completed in June 1988 after 21 days of baiting at a cost of $483/ha""  (Taylor & Thomas 1993).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
104,TC,292,"Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, Northern New Zealand",McFadden and Towns,,1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348UnknownneedAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Korapuki Island,Unit (Ha),1986,Year,1986,Unspecified,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,3560,,,3696.154171,4293.071089,3560,3696.154171,4293.071089,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Total cost of the eradication in 1986, on 18ha 
Net cost total       3560 / Net cost per hectare  198   / Boat charters 1 @ $750  = 750  / Hut        2500 / Gross cost total      6800 / Gross cost per hectare  378 
Costs in the Appendix are detailled, and Methods are well explained.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
105,TC,292,"Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, Northern New Zealand",McFadden and Towns,,1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348UnknownneedAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rurima Island,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1991,1991,One-time,8485,,,8809.513523,10232.2214,8485,8809.513523,10232.2214,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Net cost total       8485 / Net cost per hectare  1131   / Boat charters 5 @ $300 = 1500  / Gross cost total      9985 / Gross cost per hectare 133
Costs in the Appendix are detailled, and Methods are well explained.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
109,TC,303,"Eradication of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) from Hawea Island, Fiordland, using brodifacoum",Taylor and Thomas,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348?needAccess=true
McFadden, I., & Towns, D. (1991). Eradication campaigns against Kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki, Northern New Zealand. Department of Conservation International Report, 97(97), 19. 
Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hawea Island,Site,1986-1988,Period,1986,1988,1986,1988,One-time,97500,,,113969.2185,163609.1662,32500,37989.73948,54536.38872,NZD,1986,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Only 154 person-days were required to complete the eradication campaign and to confirm its success, at a total cost of about $65,000"" NZD assumed

65000$ in original paper. => travel and servicing costs (c. $7,300), + support provided by Fiordland National Park's MV Renown and her crew (c. $27,000). + material less than $700 + total cost salary and wages 30 200$ 
(not very detailed)

In Holmes ""Planning 3000 + Implementation 29000 + 38000 Isolation""
Philips 2015 : Hawea—Total reported cost was $4 K, all in implementation, citing McFadden (1992).
• Taylor and Thomas (1989, p. 28), the primary reference, report cost as $72 K, and is cited in McFadden (1992) reports cost as $71 K.
• Taylor and Thomas (1989) provide isolation (travel cost) and provide information to calcu- late planning cost; Holmes et al. omit these data from those cost centers",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
113,WoS,12955,Regional Perspectives and Opportunities for Feral Hog Management in Texas,Adams et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,"Texas 
",Site,"1990's - today (today = 2003, publication year)",Period,1990,2003,1990,2003,Potentially ongoing,2784061.538,,,3244803.824,3244803.824,184657.1429,231771.7017,231771.7017,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Hog damage to Landholders. The average economic loss per respondent over their lifetime ownership of the land was $7,515 ± $1,619 (SE) (U.S.). The total reported economic loss since feral hogs appeared on the respondents’ property was $2,585,200 (U.S.). (begining = 1990 - 1998 depending on the region)
Types of damage ++ reported = rooting damage to roads, ponds, or fields (87%);wallowing in tanks and streams (65%); and crop damage (53%).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
114,WoS,12955,Regional Perspectives and Opportunities for Feral Hog Management in Texas,Adams et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,"Texas 
",Site,"1990's - today (today = 2003, publication year)",Period,1990,2003,1990,2003,One-time,464676.1538,,,541576.7361,541576.7361,30820.35714,38684.05258,38684.05258,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The average economic cost per respondents was  $2,631± $461 (U.S.). Total reported control costs since feral hogs appeared on the respondents’ property was $431,485.
Trapping (75%) or shooting (87%) as control methods",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
120,TC,242,Department of Conservation annual report for the year ending 30 June 2002,DOC,,2002,English,Official report,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518347",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,12024000,,,7578131.699,11154384.45,12024000,7578131.699,11154384.45,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The Department currently sustains control of possums over c. 10 650 km2 in over 200 operations at an annual cost of c. $12 million.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
121,TC,242,Department of Conservation annual report for the year ending 30 June 2002,DOC,,2002,English,Official report,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518346",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,6306000,,,3974359.489,5849929.171,6306000,3974359.489,5849929.171,NZD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Table in DOC, no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
126,TC,403,Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand,Parkes and Murphy,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Mustela,Mustela erminea,,Stoat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,1547499.038,1779803.979,2000000,1547499.038,1779803.979,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The Department has created five kiwi sanctuaries covering c. 40 000 ha where it conducts intensive predator control at an annual cost of c. $2 million funded out of the New Zealand Biodiversity Strategy and with sponsorship from the Bank of New Zealand.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
135,TC,299,"Eradication of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) on Santa Catalina Island, California",Schuyler et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Morrison, S. a. (2007). Reducing Risk and Enhancing Efficiency in Non-Native Vertebrate Removal Efforts on Islands: A 25 Year Multi-Taxa Retrospective from Santa Cruz Island, California. Managing Vertebrate Invasive Species, (August), 398–409. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgiUnknownarticle=1030&context=nwrcinvasive",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California (Catalina Island),Site,1990-2001,Period,1990,2001,1990,2001,One-time,2043881.455,,,2785241.81,2785241.81,170323.4545,232103.4841,232103.4841,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"direct cost of Catalina Island project from 1990-2001, unadjusted for inflation and not including costs associated with fencing, fuel, administration/support by sponsor",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
137,TC,491,"Reducing Risk and Enhancing Efficiency in Non-Native Vertebrate Removal Efforts on Islands: A 25 Year Multi-Taxa Retrospective from Santa Cruz Island, California",Morrison,,2007,English,Book chapter,Parkes et al. 2017 Eradicating mammals on New Zealand island reserves: What is left to do?,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,California (Catalina Island),Site,1990-2005,Period,1990,2005,1990,2005,One-time,3430945.067,,,4056052.971,4056052.971,214434.0667,253503.3107,253503.3107,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Catalina Island expenditures over 15 years (1990 -2005). Corrected for inflation and extrapolated from Schuyler et al 2002. Based on other report, but no reference nor details are given.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
139,WoS,1396,Eradicating mammals on New Zealand island reserves: What is left to do? ,Parkes et al ,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,San Nicolas ,Site,2009-2010,Year,2009,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1271500,,,1429312.951,1429312.951,1271500,1429312.951,1429312.951,USD,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Island Conservation, Unpublished data] Cost of successful insular cat eradication campaigns. Costs converted by Campbell et al 2011. Excludes $680,000 in fox mitigation and costs of live removal of cats (A. Little pers. comm. 2010), including these costs the campaign cost $547/ha",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
143,WoS,1396,Eradicating mammals on New Zealand island reserves: What is left to do? ,Parkes et al ,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Plata island,Site,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,260000,,,297063.4048,620519.1556,260000,297063.4048,620519.1556,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Island Conservation , Unknown, Unpublished data] Cost of successful insular cat eradication campaigns. Costs converted by Campbell et al 2011.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
145,TC,571,The eradication of feral cats from Ascension Island and its subsequent recolonization by seabirds,Ratcliffe et al,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Parkes, J. P., Byrom, A. E., & Edge, K. A. (2017). Eradicating mammals on New Zealand island reserves: What is left to do? New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.20417/nzjecol.41.25",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Ascension Island,Site,2002-2006,Period,2002,2006,2002,2006,One-time,650000,,,1156934.453,1046103.988,130000,231386.8906,209220.7976,GBP,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of the entire restoration project (February 2002 to January 2006)  including eradication effort and monitoring of cats and seabirds = GBP 650,000. 
/!\ may include costs non related to eradication",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
146,TC,297,"Eradication of feral cats on Faure Island, Western Australia",Algar et al,,2010,English,Official report,"Parkes, J., & Murphy, E. (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30(4), 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518347",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Faure Island,Site,3 weeks,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,26000,,,29227.0049,21222.73591,26000,29227.0049,21222.73591,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NOT FOUND IN ORIGINAL PAPER,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
149,WoS,10748,"Bio-Economics of Large-Scale Eradication of Feral Goats From Santiago Island, Galápagos",Cruz et al,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos (Santiago Island),Site,52 months,Period,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1422563.404,,,7287528.105,3918371.303,6164394,7287528.105,3918371.303,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Total cost of the eradication campaign was US$6,164,394.
Cost details are provided for each action specifically (the method is then reproducible, the original costs are provided and sources are traceable) ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
150,WoS,10748,"Bio-Economics of Large-Scale Eradication of Feral Goats From Santiago Island, Galápagos",Cruz et al,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos (Santiago Island),Site,14 months,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2009,2009,One-time,549243.9957,,,649314.605,1512861.855,549243.9957,649314.605,1512861.855,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Monitoring of eradication (10% of campaign cost)
Cost details are provided for each action specifically (the method is then reproducible, the original costs are provided and sources are traceable) ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
151,WoS,10748,"Bio-Economics of Large-Scale Eradication of Feral Goats From Santiago Island, Galápagos",Cruz et al,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos (Isabela Island),Site,3 years,Period,2006,2009,2006,2009,One-time,3700000,,,4227440.76,8830464.907,1233333.333,1409146.92,2943488.302,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Campbell, 2009, Unpublished data] No calculation, no details : ""59000 goats removed"" and ""cost per ha to remove goats was $US8 compared with US$105 on Santiago Island""
"" <3 years""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
156,WoS,2658,Defending against disparate marine turtle nest predators: Nesting success benefits from eradicating invasive feral swine and caging nests from raccoons,Engeman et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida (Keewaydin Island),Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,14020,,,14318.64142,14318.64142,14020,14318.64142,14318.64142,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""The cost of eradication of swine in 2008 was USD 14 020"" no source, no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
157,WoS,2658,Defending against disparate marine turtle nest predators: Nesting success benefits from eradicating invasive feral swine and caging nests from raccoons,Engeman et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida (Keewaydin Island),Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,379100,,,387175.247,387175.247,379100,387175.247,387175.247,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Swine impact marine turtle nesting. They consider 100 USD per hatchling (previous study Engeman 2002)  --> ""The value of the estimated 3791 hatchlings lost to swine is 379 1000 USA""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
162,WoS,2388,Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it's not all or nothing,Helmstedt et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Faure Island,Unit (58 km2),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,659043,,,500352.6226,453094.4637,659043,500352.6226,453094.4637,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The authors assessed that they have taken the individual eradication costs from Martin et al 2006 (ID WOS12448), but it was impossible to find these values in the original paper",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
163,WoS,2388,Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it's not all or nothing,Helmstedt et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Faure Island,Unit (58 km2),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,397112,,,301491.755,273015.9469,397112,301491.755,273015.9469,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The authors assessed that they have taken the individual eradication costs from Martin et al 2006 (ID WOS12448), but it was impossible to find these values in the original paper",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
164,WoS,2388,Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it's not all or nothing,Helmstedt et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Bos,Ovis aries,,Sheep,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Faure Island,Unit (58 km2),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,775200,,,588540.282,532952.8245,775200,588540.282,532952.8245,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The authors assessed that they have taken the individual eradication costs from Martin et al 2006 (ID WOS12448), but it was impossible to find these values in the original paper",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
165,WoS,2388,Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it's not all or nothing,Helmstedt et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Macquarie Island,Unit (128 Km²),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,1289885,,,979294.7389,886800.6372,1289885,979294.7389,886800.6372,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The authors assessed that they have taken the individual eradication costs from Martin et al 2006 (ID WOS12448), but it was impossible to find these values in the original paper",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
167,WoS,2388,Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it's not all or nothing,Helmstedt et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (128 Km²),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,1286177,,,976479.5849,884251.3737,1286177,976479.5849,884251.3737,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The authors assessed that they have taken the individual eradication costs from Martin et al 2006 (ID WOS12448), but it was impossible to find these values in the original paper",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
168,WoS,2388,Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it's not all or nothing,Helmstedt et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Tasmania,Unit (1.2 km2),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,24395,,,18520.94966,16771.65138,24395,18520.94966,16771.65138,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The authors assessed that they have taken the individual eradication costs from Martin et al 2006 (ID WOS12448), but it was impossible to find these values in the original paper",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
169,WoS,2388,Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it's not all or nothing,Helmstedt et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Hermite,Unit (10.2 km2),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,150672,,,114391.8232,103587.549,150672,114391.8232,103587.549,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The authors assessed that they have taken the individual eradication costs from Martin et al 2006 (ID WOS12448), but it was impossible to find these values in the original paper",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
172,TC,307,Eradications of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gregory et al,,2014,English,Official report,"Helmstedt, K. J., Shaw, J. D., Bode, M., Terauds, A., Springer, K., Robinson, S. A., & Possingham, H. P. (2016). Prioritizing eradication actions on islands: it’s not all or nothing. Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(3), 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12599
2388",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Tasmania,Unit (Km),2000-2014,Period,2000,2014,2000,2014,One-time,350000000,,,326668795.7,249498874.6,23333333.33,21777919.71,16633258.3,AUD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Since 2000, the total cost of the fox eradication effort (including funding for the Fox Free Taskforce (2001-2006)) has been over AUD$35 million. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
176,WoS,9566,Long-term cost-effectiveness of coypu (Myocastor coypus) control in Piedmont (Italy),Bertolino and Viterbi,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Piedmont,Site,1997-2005,Period,1997,2005,1997,2005,One-time,336308,,,500697.4209,369536.9777,37367.55556,55633.04677,41059.66419,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"336 308 € (mean 37,368 ± 15,837 /year)
Amount reimbursed by authorities /!\ double count with Panzacchi et al 2007
Started in 1995 in Vercelli, followed by several others. ""In the same period, authorities reimbursed € 336,308 (mean 37,368 ± 15,837 €/year) for agricultural damage caused by coypu.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
177,WoS,9566,Long-term cost-effectiveness of coypu (Myocastor coypus) control in Piedmont (Italy),Bertolino and Viterbi,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Piedmont,Site,1997-2005,Year,1997,2005,1997,2005,One-time,34956,,,52093.48488,50821.38151,34956,52093.48488,50821.38151,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Costs of annual damage according to the year, between 1997 and 2005 : 10105 - 58807€. These are minimum and maximum values over all years, as no details are provided regarding the cost per year. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
178,TC,228,Population control of coypu Myocastor coypus in Italy compared to eradication in UK: a cost-benefit analysis,Panzacchi et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Bertolino, S., & Viterbi, R. (2010). Long-term cost-effectiveness of coypu (Myocastor coypus) control in Piedmont (Italy). Biological Invasions, 12(8), 2549–2558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9664-4",No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Unspecified,Country,1995-2000,Period,1995,2000,1995,2000,One-time,10696583,,,17330336.67,15608529.08,1782763.833,2888389.445,2601421.513,EUR,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"During 1995-2000,the overall damage caused by the rodents reached a total of € 10,696,583 => damage to riverbanks. Results from a survey",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
180,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Ascension,Site,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,815661,,,1086846.575,955456.4448,815661,1086846.575,955456.4448,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[From Royal Society for the Protection of Birds] Original reports not found (grey litterature), but the review seems good. Prices reajusted to US$ 2003",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
196,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Great Barrier,Site,1987,Year,1987,Unspecified,1987,1987,Potentially ongoing,32975,,,43938.30991,50534.16957,32975,43938.30991,50534.16957,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
199,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Kapiti Island,Site,1986,Year,1986,Unspecified,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,149498,,,199202.1063,229105.6037,149498,199202.1063,229105.6037,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
201,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Lord Howe Island,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,48125,,,64125.28171,72921.09406,48125,64125.28171,72921.09406,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Original references cited (Parkes, Macdonald & Leaman (2002), Anon. (2003) G. Copson (pers. comm.)) not found, but the review seems good. Prices reajusted to US$ 2003",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
202,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Macquarie Island,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,2356350,,,3139773.664,3570444.052,2356350,3139773.664,3570444.052,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Copson, 2006, Personal communication] original reports not found (grey litterature), but the review seems good. Prices reajusted to US$ 2003",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
210,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Raoul,Site,1986,Year,1986,Unspecified,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,551470,,,734819.0983,845127.4752,551470,734819.0983,845127.4752,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
212,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Mauritius,,Round,Site,1986,Year,1986,Unspecified,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,48286,,,64339.80993,137443.6072,48286,64339.80993,137443.6072,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Hartley, 2006, Personal communication] original reports not found (grey litterature), but the review seems good. Prices reajusted to US$ 2003",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
219,WoS,12448,Costing eradications of alien mammals from islands,Martins et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora/Rodentia,Felidae/Muridae,Felis/Rattus,Felis catus,,Cat/Rats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Tahua,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,67543,,,89999.24992,103509.6108,67543,89999.24992,103509.6108,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Data were kindly supplied (two years ahead of it being accessible on the web) by Dr Wendy Evans, project manager for Pestlink (web-based animal pest database) from the Northern Regional Office of the Department of Conservation, New Zealand",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
220,WoS,9739,"Assessing the control/eradication of an invasive species, the American mink, based on field data; how much would it cost",Zuberogoitia et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Spain,Basque country,Butron river basin,Unit (Day),2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,24713,,,27780.26816,28880.76847,24713,27780.26816,28880.76847,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The initial investment needed for materials in use (i.e., cage-traps, camera-traps, baits) was 4,263 €, and the average cost for a field day (trappers, kilometres) was 223 €. 
Overall, 90 effective trapping days amounted to 24,713 €.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
224,WoS,12268,"Feral swine management for conservation of an imperiled wetland habitat: Florida's vanishing seepage slopes
",Engeman et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2003-2005,Period,2003,2005,2003,2005,Potentially ongoing,8746061,,,10339567.09,10339567.09,2915353.667,3446522.364,3446522.364,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The analyses were carried out for hunted and unhunted areas separately (see details Table 4). Here are presented combined values for both types of areas : 2003: $5,341,143; 2004: $1,919,091; 2005: $1,485,827

",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
225,WoS,12268,"Feral swine management for conservation of an imperiled wetland habitat: Florida's vanishing seepage slopes
",Engeman et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2003-2004,Year,2003,2004,2004,2004,One-time,82352.94118,,,97357.40015,97357.40015,82352.94118,97357.40015,97357.40015,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The analyses were carried out for hunted and unhunted areas separately (see details Table 4).,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
230,WoS,8791,Archipelago-wide island restoration in the galápagos islands: Reducing costs of invasive mammal eradication programs and reinvasion risk,Carrion et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos (Northern Isabela Island),Site,2 years,Period,2009,2011,2009,2011,One-time,4172035,,,4766765.084,9957029.367,2086017.5,2383382.542,4978514.683,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"A total of 62 818 goats were removed from the island over 2 years for a cost of $4.1 million. Initial investment, no reintroduction",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
231,WoS,8791,Archipelago-wide island restoration in the galápagos islands: Reducing costs of invasive mammal eradication programs and reinvasion risk,Carrion et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos (Pinta islan,Site,1999-2003,Period,1999,2003,1999,2003,One-time,194090,,,221757.8317,463217.5497,38818,44351.56633,92643.50993,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Includes eradication efforts from 1999–2003; does not include prior control efforts. 83 949 initial investment in eradication + 110 141 US$ due to one reintroduction,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
232,WoS,8791,Archipelago-wide island restoration in the galápagos islands: Reducing costs of invasive mammal eradication programs and reinvasion risk,Carrion et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos (Santiago island),Site,2008-2009,Year,2008,2009,2009,2009,One-time,3190859.5,,,7291442.978,7615344.01,6381719,7291442.978,7615344.01,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Initial investment $6 349 326, 1 reintroduction $32 393 (cost of control after one re introduction)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
233,WoS,8791,Archipelago-wide island restoration in the galápagos islands: Reducing costs of invasive mammal eradication programs and reinvasion risk,Carrion et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos (Santa Cruz island),Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,281740,,,321902.4756,672404.1035,281740,321902.4756,672404.1035,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Initial investment, no reintroduction",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
235,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus familiaris,Wild dogs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales ,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,1410000,,,1346501.449,1085321.585,1410000,1346501.449,1085321.585,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
236,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus familiaris,Wild dogs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,1161000,,,1108715.023,893658.4116,1161000,1108715.023,893658.4116,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
237,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus familiaris,Wild dogs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Victoria,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,4235000,,,4044279.174,3259813.413,4235000,4044279.174,3259813.413,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
238,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus familiaris,Wild dogs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,1980000,,,1890831.822,1524068.609,1980000,1890831.822,1524068.609,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (agriculture). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
239,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus familiaris,Wild dogs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,450000,,,429734.5049,346379.2293,450000,429734.5049,346379.2293,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (conservation estate). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
240,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,Canis lupus familiaris,Wild dogs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australian Capital Territory,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,181000,,,172848.7675,139321.4233,181000,172848.7675,139321.4233,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
253,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,330000,,,315138.6369,254011.4348,330000,315138.6369,254011.4348,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (conservation estate). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
254,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,656000,,,626457.4116,504943.9432,656000,626457.4116,504943.9432,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
255,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,999000,,,954010.6009,768961.889,999000,954010.6009,768961.889,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (agriculture). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
256,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,100000,,,95496.55664,76973.16207,100000,95496.55664,76973.16207,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (conservation estate). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
257,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australian Capital Territory,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,2000,,,1909.931133,1539.463241,2000,1909.931133,1539.463241,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
258,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,Rabbits,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,18000,,,17189.3802,13855.16917,18000,17189.3802,13855.16917,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (conservation estate). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
259,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,Rabbits,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,1058000,,,1010353.569,814376.0547,1058000,1010353.569,814376.0547,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
260,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,Rabbits,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Victoria,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,1835000,,,1752361.814,1412457.524,1835000,1752361.814,1412457.524,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
261,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,Rabbits,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,770000,,,735323.4861,592693.3479,770000,735323.4861,592693.3479,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (agriculture). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
262,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,Rabbits,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australian Capital Territory,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,192000,,,183353.3888,147788.4712,192000,183353.3888,147788.4712,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
263,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral cats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,140000,,,133695.1793,107762.4269,140000,133695.1793,107762.4269,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (conservation estate). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
264,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral cats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,75000,,,71622.41748,57729.87155,75000,71622.41748,57729.87155,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
265,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral cats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,660000,,,630277.2738,508022.8696,660000,630277.2738,508022.8696,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (agriculture). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
266,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral cats,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,1650000,,,1575693.185,1270057.174,1650000,1575693.185,1270057.174,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (conservation estate). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. 
The $1.650m for the feral cats in WA conservation estate comprises expenditure on direct management and on one year of the cat mesopredator work",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
270,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Perissodactyla,Equidae,Equus,Equus asinus,,Donkeys,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,10000,,,9549.655664,7697.316207,10000,9549.655664,7697.316207,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
271,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Perissodactyla,Equidae,Equus,Equus asinus,,Donkeys,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,330000,,,315138.6369,254011.4348,330000,315138.6369,254011.4348,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (agriculture). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
272,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Perissodactyla,Equidae,Equus,Equus asinus,,Donkeys,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,135000,,,128920.3515,103913.7688,135000,128920.3515,103913.7688,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (conservation estate). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
273,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Perissodactyla,Equidae,Equus,Equus caballus,,Horses ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,10000,,,9549.655664,7697.316207,10000,9549.655664,7697.316207,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
274,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Perissodactyla,Equidae,Equus,Equus caballus,,Horses ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,110000,,,105046.2123,84670.47827,110000,105046.2123,84670.47827,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research (agriculture). Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
275,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Perissodactyla,Equidae,Equus,Equus caballus,,Horses ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australian Capital Territory,Site,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,46000,,,43928.41606,35407.65455,46000,43928.41606,35407.65455,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Expenditures on management, administration, and research. Table 4.4 ""Allocation of expenditures by pest, for the year 2007–08 ($m)"". Details in the text. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
284,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,206010000,,,183574403.7,163256519.6,206010000,183574403.7,163256519.6,AUD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Table 3.11: Annual loss in total economic surplus to Australia due to rabbits,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
285,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,21150000,,,18846651.32,16760717.39,21150000,18846651.32,16760717.39,AUD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Table 3.11: Annual loss in total economic surplus to Australia due to foxes ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
286,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,9190000,,,8189159.603,7282789.258,9190000,8189159.603,7282789.258,AUD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Table 3.11: Annual loss in total economic surplus to Australia due to feral pigs,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
287,TC,564,The economic impacts of vertebrate pests in Australia,Gong et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Mus,Mus musculus,,House mouse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Darling Downs/Queensland,Site,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,1782189.25,1584937.815,2000000,1782189.25,1584937.815,AUD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"At the time of preparing report, mouse plague ongoing on the Darling Downs (Queensland) where more than $2m has been spent on mouse bait alone. ""mouse plague"" = ""mice"" = must be mus musculus ?",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
291,TC,411,Managing Vertebrate Pests: Foxes,Saunders et al,,1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Victoria,Site,1991-1992,Year,1991,1992,1992,1992,One-time,450000,,,577319.6046,592120.4972,450000,577319.6046,592120.4972,AUD,1992,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Waters et al., 1992, Personal communication] For the year 1991–92, DCNR allocated approximately $450 000 for fox control on public land (R. Waters, DCNR, Victoria, pers. comm. 1992).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
292,TC,411,Managing Vertebrate Pests: Foxes,Saunders et al,,1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,1992,Year,1992,Unspecified,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,250000,,,320733.1137,328955.8318,250000,320733.1137,328955.8318,AUD,1992,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Williams et al., 1992, Personal communication] The estimated yearly expenditur e on fox control with strychnine by landholders and government agencies in 1992 was $250 000 (M. Williams, APCC, SA, pers. comm. 1992).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
293,WoS,8839,What to do in the face of multiple threats? Incorporating dependencies within a return on investment framework for conservation,Evans et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Km²),10 years,Period,2001,2011,2001,2011,One-time,5942,,,5674.405396,4573.74529,594.2,567.4405396,457.374529,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimates based on data from Gentle and Bomford and Hart. Total cost of management endowed over 10 years. /!\ calculations are not provided, and the details of costs associated with fox management (2523.75$) + the cost of establishing conservation covenants provided in appendix 2 (3652$) do not add up to 5 942,00 => probably a discount rate was applied to the covenants costs",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
294,WoS,8839,What to do in the face of multiple threats? Incorporating dependencies within a return on investment framework for conservation,Evans et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Km²),10 years,Period,2001,2011,2001,2011,One-time,16386,,,15648.06577,12612.82234,1638.6,1564.806577,1261.282234,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimates based on data from Gentle and Bomford and Hart. Total cost of management endowed over 10 years. /!\ calculations are not provided, and the details of costs associated with fox management (12968.13$) + the cost of establishing conservation covenants provided in appendix 2 (3652$) do not add up to 16 386,00 => probably a discount rate was applied to the covenants costs",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
295,WoS,8890,Turning Pests into Profits: Introduced Buffalo Provide Multiple Benefits to Indigenous People of Northern Australia,Collier et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Bubalus,Bubalus bubalis,,Swamp buffalo,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Bulman community,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,83116,,,79372.91802,63977.01338,83116,79372.91802,63977.01338,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The most direct contribution to financial capital made was payment of wages to employees for their labour. In 2008, the total wages paid to employees was more than AU$ 83,116 (1AUD ~ 1USD).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
296,WoS,2394,Wildlife detector dogs and camera traps: a comparison of techniques for detecting feral cats,Glen et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Hawke’s Bay (Waitere and Toronui Stations),Unit (2 Landholders),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,60445,55430,65460,42973.52639,42049.90811,60445,42973.52639,42049.90811,NZD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Test 2 methods to detect wildlife : Camera trapping (65 460 NZD) and wildlife detector dogs (55 430 NZD). Used to detect feral cats (Felis catus) on two pastoral Landholders in Hawke’s Bay, North Island, New Zealand.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
297,WoS,696,Pandora’s box down-under: origins and numbers of mustelids transported to New Zealand for biological control of rabbits,King,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Southland/Otago,Site,1883-1892,Period,1883,1892,1883,1892,One-time,54280,,,69858.19627,51721.9692,5428,6985.819627,5172.19692,GBP,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of biological control of rabbits by releasing  stoats and weasels (ferrets excluded from the analysis, as costs cannot be estimated). Value in abstract is 5441GBP at least; in table 5428GBP. No details on where the data come from. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
298,TC,500,"Review of Existing Red Fox, Wild Dog, Feral Cat, Rabbit, Feral Pig, and Feral Goat Control in Australia. I. Audit. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Melbourne",Reddiex et al,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1998-2003,Year,1998,2003,1998,2003,One-time,750000,400000,1100000,715790.234,713069.8494,750000,715790.234,713069.8494,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Labour cost of animal control,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
299,TC,500,"Review of Existing Red Fox, Wild Dog, Feral Cat, Rabbit, Feral Pig, and Feral Goat Control in Australia. I. Audit. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Melbourne",Reddiex et al,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1998-2004,Year,1998,2004,1998,2004,One-time,1100000,800000,1400000,1049825.677,1045835.779,1100000,1049825.677,1045835.779,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Labour cost of animal control,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
300,TC,224,Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring,Reddiex et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Doherty, T. S., & Ritchie, E. G. (2017). Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12251",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1998-2003,Period,1998,2003,1998,2003,One-time,25542000,,,23386807.75,22137757.19,4257000,3897801.292,3689626.198,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Labor costs alone for red fox control in Australia in 1998–2003; estimated by multiplying the number of person-days by AU$320. Daily rate of $320 was estimated as the average salary/wage plus organisational overheads. No further explanation or reference to explain this rate.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
302,TC,224,Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring,Reddiex et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Doherty, T. S., & Ritchie, E. G. (2017). Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12251",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1998-2003,Period,1998,2003,1998,2003,One-time,7788000,,,7130861.279,6750013.819,1298000,1188476.88,1125002.303,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Labor costs alone for rabbit control in Australia in 1998–2003; estimated by multiplying the number of person-days by AU$320. Daily rate of $320 was estimated as the average salary/wage plus organisational overheads. No further explanation or reference to explain this rate.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
303,TC,224,Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring,Reddiex et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Doherty, T. S., & Ritchie, E. G. (2017). Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12251",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1998-2003,Period,1998,2003,1998,2003,One-time,5464800,,,5003689.101,4736450.375,910800,833948.1835,789408.3958,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Labor costs alone for wild pig control in Australia in 1998–2003; estimated by multiplying the number of person-days by AU$320. Daily rate of $320 was estimated as the average salary/wage plus organisational overheads. No further explanation or reference to explain this rate.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
304,TC,224,Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring,Reddiex et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Doherty, T. S., & Ritchie, E. G. (2017). Stop Jumping the Gun: A Call for Evidence-Based Invasive Predator Management. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12251",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1998-2003,Period,1998,2003,1998,2003,One-time,5829600,,,5337707.873,5052629.758,971600,889617.9788,842104.9597,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Labor costs alone for feral goat control in Australia in 1998–2003; estimated by multiplying the number of person-days by AU$320. Daily rate of $320 was estimated as the average salary/wage plus organisational overheads. No further explanation or reference to explain this rate.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
305,TC,363,Improving Fox Management Strategies  ,Saunders and McLeod,,2007,English,Official report,"Reddiex, B., Forsyth, D.M., McDonald-Madden, E. et al 2006 Control of pest mammals for biodiversity protection in Australia. I. Patterns of control and monitoring.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,200000000,,,197845235.6,165696341.5,200000000,197845235.6,165696341.5,AUD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""responsible for environmental and agricultural impacts valued at over $200 million per annum""
no details, no reference (Australian Bureau of Rural Sciences)
= maybe double count with McLeod 2004 (she is one of the authors. +10 million in 5 years inflation?)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
306,WoS,9182,Wise selection of an indicator for monitoring the success of management actions,Tulloch et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1500000,,,1686059.35,1081744.702,1500000,1686059.35,1081744.702,AUD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Government investment in monitoring and evaluation yearly. No references , no date",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
309,TC,602,Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand,Livingstone et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1978-1984,Year,1978,1984,1978,1984,One-time,500000,,,360601.0088,353282.7063,500000,360601.0088,353282.7063,NZD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"[O'Hara, 2015, Personal communication] ""In view of the apparent success of the possum control programme in the mid-1970s, and due to pressure on funds from the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, possum control funding was reduced (Tweddle and Livingstone 1994) to approximately $500,000 per year between 1978 and 1984 (PJ O’Hara, pers.comm.)."" Possums as vectors of TB ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
311,TC,158,A strategic approach to eradication of bovine TB from wildlife in New Zealand,Hutchings et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Livingstone, P. G., Hancox, N., Nugent, G., & de Lisle, G. W. (2015). Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(0), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.971084",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1993-1994,Year,1993,1994,1994,1994,One-time,7300000,,,6299062.522,5312059.904,7300000,6299062.522,5312059.904,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"In Fig 2, no details on the methods of cost data collection. Possums as vectors of TB. Control costs (fundings)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
312,TC,158,A strategic approach to eradication of bovine TB from wildlife in New Zealand,Hutchings et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Livingstone, P. G., Hancox, N., Nugent, G., & de Lisle, G. W. (2015). Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(0), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.971085",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,14000000,,,12080393.88,10187512.14,14000000,12080393.88,10187512.14,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"In Fig 2, no details on the methods of cost data collection. Possums as vectors of TB. Control costs (fundings)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
313,TC,158,A strategic approach to eradication of bovine TB from wildlife in New Zealand,Hutchings et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Livingstone, P. G., Hancox, N., Nugent, G., & de Lisle, G. W. (2015). Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(0), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2014.971086",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,33000000,,,28475214.14,24013421.48,33000000,28475214.14,24013421.48,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"In Fig 2, no details on the methods of cost data collection. Possums as vectors of TB. Control costs (fundings)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
314,TC,602,Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand,Livingstone et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Tait, P., Saunders, C., Nugent, G., & Rutherford, P. (2017). Valuing conservation benefits of disease control in wildlife: A choice experiment approach to bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand’s native forests. Journal of Environmental Management, 189, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.045 (id 941)",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1977,Year,1977,Unspecified,1977,1977,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,11776013.97,15692451.86,3000000,11776013.97,15692451.86,NZD,1977,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Programmes were initiated in 1972 (Davidson 1991). By 1977, possum control was being undertaken by the New Zealand Forest Service (and Agricultural Pest Destruction Boards (Adlam 1977) at a cost of approximately $3 million per year /!\ may come from Hutchings et al. 2013. Possums as vectors of TB.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
315,TC,602,Toward eradication: the effect of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wildlife on the evolution and future direction of bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand,Livingstone et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Tait, P., Saunders, C., Nugent, G., & Rutherford, P. (2017). Valuing conservation benefits of disease control in wildlife: A choice experiment approach to bovine tuberculosis management in New Zealand’s native forests. Journal of Environmental Management, 189, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.045 (id 941)",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,50000000,,,38687475.95,44495099.47,50000000,38687475.95,44495099.47,NZD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Although formal approval of this amendment was delayed until 2004 (to enable resolution of funding share issues) increased vector control funding to more than $50 million per year became available from industry and central and regional government from 2002/03, enabling the main vector control components of the strategy to be introduced.  /!\ may come from Hutchings et al. 2013. Possums as vectors of TB.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
318,WoS,7807,"Minimising number killed in long-term vertebrate pest management programmes, and associated economic incentives",Warburton et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,"Unit (9,000,000 Ha)",2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,86497320.67,71383163.06,100000000,86497320.67,71383163.06,NZD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"No calculation, no reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
322,WoS,6614,A novel approach to assess the probability of disease eradication from a wild-animal reservoir host,Anderson et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Blythe Valley,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,42750,,,36888.34559,31108.29601,42750,36888.34559,31108.29601,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Possum trapping survey. No reference,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
323,WoS,6614,A novel approach to assess the probability of disease eradication from a wild-animal reservoir host,Anderson et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Mustela,Mustela furo,,Ferret,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Blythe Valley,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,28500,,,24592.23039,20738.86401,28500,24592.23039,20738.86401,NZD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ferret survey. No reference,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
324,TC,410,Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Pigs,Choquenot et al,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Latham, A. D. M., Warburton, B., Byrom, A. E., & Pech, R. P. (2017). The ecology and management of mammal invasions in forests. Biological Invasions, 19(11), 3121–3139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1421-5
(Also in Holmes et al. 2015 and Marie et al. 2014)",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,119238945.8,122790172.3,100000000,119238945.8,122790172.3,AUD,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"original : Feral pigs are estimated to cause losses to agricultural production in Australia in the order of at least $100 million each year, although this might be a substantial underestimate.
citing paper : ""Feral pigs have similarly been estimated to cause significant agricultural damage in Australia, estimated at US$75.5 million p.a. (equivalent to c. US$126million p.a. in 2016 values)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
325,TC,410,Managing Vertebrate Pests: Feral Pigs,Choquenot et al,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1984,Year,1984,Unspecified,1984,1984,Potentially ongoing,2500000,,,3057377.651,2977994.047,2500000,3057377.651,2977994.047,AUD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimate based on Saunders and Korn (1986) : $4 million was spent on controlling pigs, rabbits and wild dogs in New South Wales in 1984. Estimate based on many assumptions.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
333,TC,316,Evaluation of fencing to control feral pig movement,Hone and Atkinson,,1983,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Choquenot, D., McIlroy, J., & Koen, T. (1996). Managing vertebrate pests: feral pigs. Bureau of Resource Sciences, 1–171. Retrieved from http://adl.brs.gov.au/data/warehouse/mvpfpr9abr_001/mvpfpr9abr_0010111a/12953_pigguide.doc",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Km),1983,Year,1983,1983,1983,1983,One-time,855,639,1336,1895.640325,1935.724985,855,1895.640325,1935.724985,AUD,1983,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Cost per km of fences. Test of different designs, electrified and non-electrified. No calculations, no details provided,
AUD assumed
Médiane : =MEDIANE(639;699;594;466;909;969;999;1234;741;801;594;466;1011;1071;1101;1336) = 855",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
343,TC,498,Response of Wedge-tailed Shearwaters ( Puffinus pacificus ) to Eradication of Black Rats (Rattus rattus) from Mokuauia Island after Reinvasion ,Marie et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii (Moku'auia),Unit (5 Ha),4 months (October 2011 to January 2012),Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1268,,,1312.903035,1312.903035,1268,1312.903035,1312.903035,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Quelle données garder ??  (on avait mis min 1268 (données originales) - max 7000 (cité dans Holmes) mais je pense qu'il faut trancher ? et plutot garder la première donnée vérifiée dans Marie et al ?               In Holmes et al : Costs reported for eradications on islands. (standardized + inflation => all values are in 2013 USD)  Implementation (material, personnel, etc) = 7000 US$ 2013 (standardized + inflation) and
""Value of volunteer labor estimated using mean hourly wage for conservation scientists in Hawaii in 2012—http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes191031.htm. Also included trapping as a method""
in Marie et al ""We made 10 visits to the island involving 203 hr of work to monitor and eradicate rats from October 2011 to January 2012. The total cost of materials was $1,268,"" ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
347,TC,328,FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Palmyra Atoll National Wildlife Refuge Rat Eradication Project,United States Fish and Wildlife Service  ,,2011,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2016. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,,Palmyra Atoll,Unit (250 Ha),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2011,2011,One-time,1915900,,,2015927.582,2015927.582,1915900,2015927.582,2015927.582,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Budget estimate $1,951,500 + $1,915,900 + $1,366,400 for 3 different poisons dispersal method. Here we reported the median value. ?Salaries for bait station treatments calculated at GS7 level for 2,476 person-days. Salaries for aerial treatments calculated at GS 13 level for 684 person-days (which includes proactive shorebird mitigation).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
364,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,New Zealand,,Whenua Hou (Codfish),Site,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,500000,,,571275.7784,621904.1713,500000,571275.7784,621904.1713,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Includes non- target mitigation.  
(also converted to 387 400USD 2009)
Details provided for the total area, and how the eradication was done, but not for prices.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
366,GS,299,Beyond Kapiti - a decade of invasive rodent eradications from new zealand islands,Broome,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Campbell,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,2520000,,,2879229.923,3134397.023,2520000,2879229.923,3134397.023,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Includes trial and result monitoring.  
(also converted to 1 868 700USD 2009)
Details provided for the total area, and how the eradication was done, but not for prices.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
380,TC,292,"Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, Northern New Zealand",McFadden and Towns,,1991,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Korapuki Island,Site,1986-1987,Year,1986,1987,1987,1987,One-time,6800,,,7610.673805,8295.646441,6800,7610.673805,8295.646441,NZD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"All details are provided. Gross total cost => 6800$ 
Implementation 6000 + Isolation 1000 from Holmes et al.
Coment Philips 2015 : Korapuki—Total reported cost was $7 K, all in implementation, citingMcFaddenandTowns(1991).
• McFadden and Towns (1991, Appendix 2, p. 18) provide isolation (travel cost); Holmes et al. omit these data from that cost center.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
381,TC,292,"Eradication campaigns against kiore (Rattus exulans) on Rurima Rocks and Korapuki Island, Northern New Zealand",McFadden and Towns,,1991,English,Official report,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus exulans,,Polynesian rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Rurima,Unit (8 Ha),1983-1984,Year,1983,1984,1984,1984,One-time,9985,,,11175.37911,12181.18084,9985,11175.37911,12181.18084,NZD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Gross total cost => 9985$
9000 Implementation + 2000 Isolation from Holmes et al
Philips 2015 : Rurima—Total reported cost was $11 K, all in implementation, citing McFadden and Towns (1991).
• McFadden and Towns (1991, Appendix 2, p. 18) provide isolation (travel cost); Holmes et al. omit these data from that cost center",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
382,TC,487,"Rapid eradication of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) from Santa Cruz Island, California. Biol Conserv 143:634–641",Parkes et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Holmes et al. 2015. Correction: Reporting costs for invasive vertebrate eradications,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,California (Santa Cruz island),Site,2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,1789200,,,2011267.583,2011267.583,1789200,2011267.583,2011267.583,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Prior to the launch of the eradication effort the island was divided into five zones using a 9-wire 1-m-high fence => 42.6 km of fencing and cost US$42,000 per km for the direct establishment costs. (1 789 200 = 42,6*42000)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
383,WoS,7081,Nocturnal distance sampling of a Mediterranean population of fallow deer is consistent with population projections,Focardi et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Dama,Dama dama,,Fallow deer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Preserve of Castelporziano ,Unit (Park),5 years,Period,2008,2013,2008,2013,One-time,226502,,,316437.0708,243454.1941,45300.4,63287.41416,48690.83883,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of distance sampling survey : details in supplementary materials. Includes costs of equipment, costs of personnel, and logistic costs",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
384,WoS,6888,"Changes in the impact and control of an invasive alien: The grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Great Britain, as determined from regional surveys",Mayle and Broome,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,Grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,11400000,,,17269285.1,10981551.17,11400000,17269285.1,10981551.17,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Broome and Johnson, Unknown, Unpublished data] In 2000 the cost of grey squirrel damage to the British timber industry, based on tree loss, reduction in timber quality and reduced yield (as described above), was estimated to be up to GBP10 million [€11.4 million (€1.14=GBP1.00 on 15 September 2011)] at the end of the then current rotation for standing crops of sycamore, beech and oak (BroomeAand Johnson A, unpublished), with a 2% loss in revenue from Corsican and Scots pine thinnings",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
385,WoS,6888,"Changes in the impact and control of an invasive alien: The grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Great Britain, as determined from regional surveys",Mayle and Broome,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,Grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),1983,Year,1983,Unspecified,1983,1983,Potentially ongoing,22.8,,,34.53857021,21.96310235,22.8,34.53857021,21.96310235,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Broome, 1983, Unpublished data] Using information from the 1983 survey with 1998 prices, Broome (unpublished) estimated the cost of control per hectare, and found no relationship between control effort and grey squirrel damage, with most estates or woodlands spending less than GBP20 ha?1 year?1 [€22.8 ha?1 year?1 (€1.14=GBP1.00 on 15 September2011)] on control.

Damage costs drop to below GBP50/ha when around GBP20/ha is spent on control",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
392,WoS,4764,Current distribution of invasive feral pigs in Brazil: Economic impacts and ecological uncertainty,Pedrosa et al,NA,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,South America,Brazil,,Sao Paulo,Unit (340 Ha),2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,1250000,,,388569.0511,695244.9898,1250000,388569.0511,695244.9898,REA,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""An important agro industry from São Paulo reported us its losses: 340 ha of maize crop in a year, equivalent to 2.84 thousand tons of grains or around 
R$1.25 million ($430.000 dollars).""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
400,WoS,5676,When to declare successful eradication of an invasive predator?,Rout et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Phillip Island,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,160000,,,149334.3066,114056.6284,160000,149334.3066,114056.6284,AUD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Managing foxes on Phillip Island currently costs around AU$160 000 per year. No reference,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
411,WoS,4250,Assessment of the efficiency in trapping North American mink (Neovison vison) for population control in Patagonia,Medina-Vogel et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Argentina/Chile,,Patagonia (Magdalena Fiord),Regional,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,2000,,,2248.231146,,2000,2248.231146,,USD,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"2000 USD approximately (over a million chilean pesos, rate 1 US$ = 500,00 CH)
""These were the added costs of food, baits, housing, or camping rental, petrol, Tiopental® (Biosano S.A, Santiago, Chile) and miscellaneous. Cost of traps, transport from the university to the campsite, and the salaries of trappers were not considered in the analysis.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
412,WoS,4250,Assessment of the efficiency in trapping North American mink (Neovison vison) for population control in Patagonia,Medina-Vogel et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Argentina/Chile,,Patagonia (Cisnes River),Regional,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,500,,,562.0577865,,500,562.0577865,,USD,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Minimum 500 USD  (rate 1 US$ = 500,00 CH) ""These were the added costs of food, baits, housing, or camping rental, petrol, Tiopental® (Biosano S.A, Santiago, Chile) and miscel- laneous. Cost of traps, transport from the university to the campsite, and the salaries of trappers were not considered in the analysis.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
413,WoS,1129,Optimizing confirmation of invasive species eradication with rapid eradication assessment,Russell et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Mus,Mus musculus,,House mouse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,Y,North America,Mexico,,Isla Pajaros/Isla Muertos,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,312623.2,,,312623.2,430008.2899,312623.2,312623.2,430008.2899,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Aguirre-Munoz, 2017, Personal communication] Total field cost for mouse eradication (excludes pre-eradication planning but includes pre-eradication population studies)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
414,WoS,1129,Optimizing confirmation of invasive species eradication with rapid eradication assessment,Russell et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Mus,Mus musculus,,House mouse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,Y,North America,Mexico,,Isla Pajaros/Isla Muertos,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,15000,,,15000,20632.26385,15000,15000,20632.26385,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Aguirre-Munoz, 2017, Personal communication] Cost of follow-up missions for biodiversity recovery monitoring",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
415,WoS,4357,Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation,Warburton and Gormley,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Mustela,Mustela erminea,,Stoat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,43421,,,44905.37568,43994.03291,43421,44905.37568,43994.03291,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Trap costs + estimate of time for setting up and checking the traps (based on daily contract rate of $NZ300)
""most stoat populations could be managed at a trap cost of about $US11/ha using DOC 150 traps rather than $US17/ha if using A24 traps (Fig. 8b). Similarly, if the much cheaper snap-back traps are used, three of these could be used per site at a cost of only $US6.50/ha""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
416,WoS,4357,Optimising the application of multiple-capture traps for invasive species management using spatial simulation,Warburton and Gormley,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,650,,,672.2206811,658.5781394,650,672.2206811,658.5781394,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Trap costs + estimate of time for setting up and checking the traps (based on daily contract rate of $NZ300)
""if using six captures per site the DOC 150 traps would be the most expensive option ($US1100/ha), followed by the A24 ($US650/ha), and then the snap- back traps ($US280/ha)"". Median = 650",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
419,WoS,5924,Using digital data collection tools to improve overall cost-efficiency and provide timely analysis for decision making during invasive species eradication campaigns,Will et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,San Nicolas ,Site,2 years,Period,2013,2014,2012,2014,One-time,154765,,,160245.6137,160245.6137,51588.33333,53415.20457,53415.20457,USD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Approximate cost for using digital vs conventional paper+GPS data collection. Detailed methods to calculate costs. ""55 960 (digital) +98 805 (paper+gps)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
420,WoS,5924,Using digital data collection tools to improve overall cost-efficiency and provide timely analysis for decision making during invasive species eradication campaigns,Will et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Haida Gwaii/British Columbia,Site,2 months,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2014,2014,One-time,53755,,,55658.59829,50037.67257,53755,55658.59829,50037.67257,USD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Approximate cost for using digital vs conventional paper+GPS data collection. Detailed methods to calculate costs. 29 140 (digital) + 24 615 (paper+gps),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
423,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Alabama,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,21322000,,,22763842.49,22763842.49,21322000,22763842.49,22763842.49,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
424,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Arkansas,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,19575000,,,20898706.35,20898706.35,19575000,20898706.35,20898706.35,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
425,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,5985000,,,6389719.412,6389719.412,5985000,6389719.412,6389719.412,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
426,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Georgia,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,5150000,,,5498254.799,5498254.799,5150000,5498254.799,5498254.799,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
427,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Louisiana,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,15670000,,,16729641.3,16729641.3,15670000,16729641.3,16729641.3,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
428,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Mississippi,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,18518000,,,19770229.59,19770229.59,18518000,19770229.59,19770229.59,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
429,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Missouri,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,486000,,,518864.4335,518864.4335,486000,518864.4335,518864.4335,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
430,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,North Carolina,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,4684000,,,5000742.811,5000742.811,4684000,5000742.811,5000742.811,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
431,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,South Carolina,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,8747000,,,9338492.18,9338492.18,8747000,9338492.18,9338492.18,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
432,WoS,1920,Economic estimates of feral swine damage and control in 11 US states,Anderson et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Texas,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,89817000,,,95890631.32,95890631.32,89817000,95890631.32,95890631.32,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Information on crop damage. Producers gave data on their highest valued crop harvested on their operation in 2010 (shoot on sight + hunt with / without dog + Aerial + traps + Reppelants + (electric) fence),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
433,WoS,6054,Locating species range frontiers: A cost and efficiency comparison of citizen science and hair-tube survey methods for use in tracking an invasive squirrel,Goldstein et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,Grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Ireland,,Munster Province,Site,196-730 days,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2014,2014,One-time,5794.2475,10246.57,12930.42,7948.244441,5849.521038,5794.2475,7948.244441,5849.521038,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Additional detail on costs is provided in Supplementary Material available for this paper.
""The total cost of surveying the 14 sites with hair tubes was €10 246.57, whereas the cost of the citizen science survey was €12 930.42 over 2 year""
The cost of the citizen science survey, when standardised to a time period comparable to the duration of the hair-tube survey, was €2850.77.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
434,WoS,1551,"Past, present and two potential futures for managing New Zealand’s mammalian pests",Parkes et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phalangeridae,Trichosurus,Trichosurus vulpecula,,Common brushtail possum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,54000000,,,46383547.57,38808294.65,54000000,46383547.57,38808294.65,NZD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""It began in the 1970s, paused in the 1980s, and then increased again to an annual expenditure in 2014 of c. $54 million.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
436,WoS,341,Effectiveness of a bounty program for reducing wild pig densities,Ditchkoff et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Georgia (Fort Benning),Site,June 2007-February 2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,57296,,,57296,57296,57296,57296,57296,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Participants reported harvesting 1,138 pigs at a cost of US$57,296, or US$50.35/pig. This estimate included the cost of paid bounties (US$35,950), traps (US $5,000), and bait (US$16,346) that were supplied by Fort Benning.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
439,GS,301,"Cost of Pest Animals in NSW and Australia, 2013-14",McLeod,,2016,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2013-2014,Year,2013,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,216630000,,,164467855.1,148933914.3,216630000,164467855.1,148933914.3,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Annual loss in production for the average impact scenario ; in the article, low and high impact scenarios are also given (108 310 000 low - 250 570 000 high). Methods are described and details of calculations given in references. Parameter data are available in appendix. Production losses for rabbits are reported for wool, sheep-meat and beef production",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
440,GS,301,"Cost of Pest Animals in NSW and Australia, 2013-14",McLeod,,2016,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2013-2014,Year,2013,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,6790000,,,5155041.943,4668149.74,6790000,5155041.943,4668149.74,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Annual loss in production for the average impact scenario ; in the article, low and high impact scenarios are also given (5 300 000low - 8 480 000high). Methods are described and details of calculations given in references. Parameter data are available in appendix. Wool, sheep-meat and beef production losses",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
441,GS,301,"Cost of Pest Animals in NSW and Australia, 2013-14",McLeod,,2016,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2013-2014,Year,2013,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,14400000,,,10932636.82,9900052.467,14400000,10932636.82,9900052.467,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Annual loss in production for the average impact scenario ; in the article, low and high impact scenarios are also given (12 730 000 low - 15 640 000 high). Methods are described and details of calculations given in references. Parameter data are available in appendix. Production loss to wool, sheep-meat production and cropping industries. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
442,GS,301,"Cost of Pest Animals in NSW and Australia, 2013-14",McLeod,,2016,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2013-2014,Year,2013,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,28830000,22560000,35100000,21888049.96,19820730.04,28830000,21888049.96,19820730.04,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Annual loss in production for the average impact scenario ; in the article, low and high impact scenarios are also given (22 560 000 low - 35 100 000 high). Methods are described and details of calculations given in references. Parameter data are available in appendix. Production  losses to wool and sheep-meat production",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
443,GS,301,"Cost of Pest Animals in NSW and Australia, 2013-14",McLeod,,2016,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2013-2014,Year,2013,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,89330000,,,67820308.81,61414700.48,89330000,67820308.81,61414700.48,AUD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Annual loss in production for the average impact scenario ; in the article, low and high impact scenarios are also given (64 390 000 low- 111 210 000 high). Methods are described and details of calculations given in references. Parameter data are available in appendix. Production losses to wool, sheep-meat and beef productions. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
452,TC,628,"Wild dog management 2010 to 2014—National landholder survey results, ABARES report to client prepared for Australian Wool Innovation Ltd, Canberra",Binks et al,,2015,English,Official report,"McLeod 2016 Cost of Pest Animals in NSW and Australia, 2013-14.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Property),2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,7197,,,6717.243778,5130.409715,7197,6717.243778,5130.409715,AUD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Survey found that farmers in wild dog affected areas are spending 26 days and $7,197 a year on wild dog management (1010 Landholders surveyed)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
453,TC,426,Monitoring Systems for Feral Pigs: Monitoring the Economic Damage to Agricultural Industries and the Population Dynamics of Feral Pigs in the Wet Tropics of Queensland,Mitchell and Dorney,,2002,English,Official report,"McLeod 2016 Cost of Pest Animals in NSW and Australia, 2013-14.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,North Queensland (11 banana farms/19 sugar cane farms),Site,28 months,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,One-time,280667,,,207801.1688,286175.758,280667,207801.1688,286175.758,AUD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Survey. Total for pig control.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
454,TC,426,Monitoring Systems for Feral Pigs: Monitoring the Economic Damage to Agricultural Industries and the Population Dynamics of Feral Pigs in the Wet Tropics of Queensland,Mitchell and Dorney,,2002,English,Official report,"McLeod 2016 Cost of Pest Animals in NSW and Australia, 2013-14.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,North Queensland (11 banana farms/19 sugar cane farms),Site,28 months,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,258466,,,191363.9184,263539.0105,258466,191363.9184,263539.0105,AUD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Survey. Total cost for pig damage
Cane : Loss = $237,268 + Banana = $21,198",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
459,TC,424,"Molecular techniques, wildlife management and the importance of genetic population structure and dispersal: A case study with feral pigs",Hampton et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,"McMahon, C. R., Brook, B. W., Collier, N., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2010). Spatially explicit spreadsheet modelling for optimising the efficiency of reducing invasive animal density. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 1(1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00002.x",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,95438697.87,95075979.92,100000000,95438697.87,95075979.92,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"In Australia, feral pigs are estimated, conservatively, to cause losses to agriculture costing $100 million annually. No references, no calculations.
AUD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
467,WoS,2685,Plant community shifts caused by feral swine rooting devalue Florida rangeland,Bankovich et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Central Florida,Site,2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,16975.888,2160568,33951776,17337.49309,17337.49309,16975.888,17337.49309,17337.49309,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Median cost. Regional costof forage loss calculated from estimated loss of kg of beef per ha due to decreased forage availability due to rooting (and plant shitfs) caused by feral swine. Varies according to rooting and initial levels of plant species diversity (native grassland vs. sown). In this line, economic cost on sown parcels; range from 2% to 30% rooting : $2,160,56 / 11,317,259 / $22,634,517 / $33,951,776",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
468,WoS,2685,Plant community shifts caused by feral swine rooting devalue Florida rangeland,Bankovich et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Central Florida,Site,2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,293146,190545,439718,299390.3323,299390.3323,293146,299390.3323,299390.3323,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Median cost. Regional costof forage loss calculated from estimated loss of kg of beef per ha due to decreased forage availability due to rooting (and plant shitfs) caused by feral swine. Varies according to rooting and initial levels of plant species diversity (native grassland vs. sown). In this line, economic cost on native grassland; range from 2% to 30% rooting (293146 is the median value)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
470,WoS,5030,The Value of Using Feasibility Models in Systematic Conservation Planning to Predict Landholder Management Uptake,Tulloch et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,397428,,,370935.2175,283308.1106,397428,370935.2175,283308.1106,AUD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of investing in management for every landholder that previously conducted baiting. Diverse scenarios according to input data and management intensity. ?Social data only: high intensity management; Social data only: low intensity management; Biodiversity only; Conservation opportunity with current feasibility; Conservation opportunity with modeled feasibility.
We report the median across all scenarios = ?397428",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
472,TC,476,"Proclaimed animal research in South Australia — cost-benefits, future directions and related issues",Henzell,,1989,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia (Pastoral region),Site,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,1112750,,,1739877.438,1630916.391,1112750,1739877.438,1630916.391,AUD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Governmental report : ""discussion paper prepared by Robert Henzell in collaboration with research staff from the Animal and Plant Control Commission, South Australia""
Detailed sum of control costs in appendix : costs incurred by the VCPA (program of subsiidies) $516 000 + costs incurred by local government $596 000 in Williams ""Henzell (1991) estimated that rabbit control in South Australia for cropping and grazing land costs $1.7 million a year, $0.5 million by landholders and the rest by government.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
473,TC,476,"Proclaimed animal research in South Australia — cost-benefits, future directions and related issues",Henzell,,1989,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia (Pastoral region),Site,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,454250,,,710257.7632,665777.3718,454250,710257.7632,665777.3718,AUD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Governmental report : ""discussion paper prepared by Robert Henzell in collaboration with research staff from the Animal and Plant Control Commission, South Australia""
Detailed sum of control costs in appendix : costs inccured by landholders $454 520
in Williams ""Henzell (1991) estimated that rabbit control in South Australia for cropping and grazing land costs $1.7 million a year, $0.5 million by landholders and the rest by government.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
475,TC,476,"Proclaimed animal research in South Australia — cost-benefits, future directions and related issues",Henzell,,1989,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia (Pastoral region),Site,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,2200000,,,3439883.498,3224458.377,2200000,3439883.498,3224458.377,AUD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Damage to cattle & beef production, details in appendix",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
476,TC,476,"Proclaimed animal research in South Australia — cost-benefits, future directions and related issues",Henzell,,1989,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia (Pastoral region),Site,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,2700000,,,4221675.202,3957289.827,2700000,4221675.202,3957289.827,AUD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Annual crop losses to rabbits in South Australia are an estimated $6.5 million (Henzell 1989).,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
477,TC,476,"Proclaimed animal research in South Australia — cost-benefits, future directions and related issues",Henzell,,1989,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,20000000,,,31271668.17,29313257.98,20000000,31271668.17,29313257.98,AUD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Henzell : a lot of details. Sheep + cattle production loss due to presence of rabbit (competition for grazing) => gives calculations etc
wrong value in Williams : (rounded a lot)  ""Henzell (1989) has estimated losses in livestock production due to competition with rabbits to be about $20 million a year in the arid zone of South Australia.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
486,TC,408,Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits,Williams,,1995,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Meter),1994,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,One-time,1.7,,,2.055410089,2.16299577,1.7,2.055410089,2.16299577,AUD,1994,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Rabbit-exclusion fencing is not an option in many circumstances due to the high cost, currently $1.70 per metre""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
487,TC,408,Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits,Williams,,1995,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),1994,Year,1994,Unspecified,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,12.5,5,20,15.11330948,15.90438066,12.5,15.11330948,15.90438066,AUD,1994,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""The total cost, about $5 per hectare for large- scale contracts, and about $20 per hectare for small-scale experimental trials (Williams and Moore, in press), comprises ..."" (details costs : poison 0.01/mL stock solution, + cost of bait $250-403/t+ cost of application",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
488,TC,408,Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits,Williams,,1995,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,1987,Year,1987,Unspecified,1987,1987,Potentially ongoing,30000000,,,43933298.33,41226007.58,30000000,43933298.33,41226007.58,AUD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Bonus introduced in 1987 (only 1 year, did not work and stopped)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
489,TC,408,Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits,Williams,,1995,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Division of New South Wales (about 877 000ha of national parks and reserves),Site,1994,Year,1994,Unspecified,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,150000,,,181359.7138,190852.568,150000,181359.7138,190852.568,AUD,1994,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual maintenace costs to prevent ripping in national parks and reserves,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
490,TC,408,Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits,Williams,,1995,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Division of New South Wales (about 877 000ha of national parks and reserves),Site,1994,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,1750000,,,2115863.327,2226613.293,1750000,2115863.327,2226613.293,AUD,1994,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"In the Western Division of New South Wales, there are some 877 000 hectares of national parks and reserves. Not all of the area is badly infested with rabbits and, allowing some $2 per hectare for initial ripping, the maximum cost of initial ripping would be $1.75 million. Annual maintenance costs thereafter might start at about $150 000 and decrease over time.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
491,TC,408,Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits,Williams,,1995,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1994,Year,1994,Unspecified,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,135000000,,,163223742.4,171767311.2,135000000,163223742.4,171767311.2,AUD,1994,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The value of lost production due to rabbits is estimated to be $20 million a year for the pastoral districts of South Australia and $115 million annually for the wool industry over the whole of Australia."" ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
492,TC,408,Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits,Williams,,1995,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Crown Land,Site,1994,Year,1994,Unspecified,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,4210,,,5090.162633,5356.595408,4210,5090.162633,5356.595408,AUD,1994,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"/!\ same place but different costs across years. Here, we take the median across these 5 years period (median of the first five years =  6399,5; median across all years = mediane (6399,5; 4210; 407) = 4210
Costs before control ""For the Rankin Springs scheme, the problem was identified as the continuing high costs of rabbit control on unoccupied Crown Land. This ranged from $5800 to $7000 annually in the five years before the scheme commenced"" (the authors said it 2 times in the text : ""5800 - 7000"" when rounded the first time, and 5780 to 7019 second time. 
""Following extensive use of 1080 and harbour destruction work in the first few years, costs rose by 5% to an average of $4210 a year over the years 1976–80.""
""However, in the subsequent five- year maintenance period (1981–85), average costs fell by 87% to $407 a year and control work was unnecessary in several years due""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
508,TC,319,Factors affecting the efficiency of fox (Vulpes vulpes) baiting practices on the central tablelands of New South Wales,Gentle,,2005,English,Thesis,"Saunders, G. R., Gentle, M. N., & Dickman, C. R. (2010). The impacts and management of foxes Vulpes vulpes in Australia. Mammal Review, 40(3), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2010.00159.x",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Vulpes,Vulpes vulpes,,Red fox,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,7 to 28 days,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,641.22,,,832.1304821,828.9679424,641.22,832.1304821,828.9679424,USD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of baits. Table 7.8 The cumulative total cost of undertaking baiting for an average baiting campaign (43 baits) lasting 7, 14, 21 and 28 days at 10, 25 and 50% bait uptake rates. Data based on the total cumulative labour and vehicle cost and the cumulative cost of bait required to replace degraded or removed baits during the baiting campaign. Note: data for day-old chicks are not presented but are identical to wingettes. Here, we present the median cost across all scenarios  =MEDIANE(358,83;365,33;376,03;339,91;343,81;350,23;495,85;515,25;547,45;593,71;600,49;611,35;671,09;689,39;730,09;847,33;856,51;871,69;813,81;846,11;904,21;1100,83;1112,11;1131,85)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
512,WoS,1295,Characterizing the Economic Value and Impacts of Wild Pig Damage on a Rural Economy,Poudyal et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Tenessee,Site,2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,32810000,,,33931631.61,33931631.61,32810000,33931631.61,33931631.61,USD,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total ""net cost"" : table 2 gives total output impact = 37.76 million dollars BUT table 3 gives total benefits = 4.95 million dollars output => total in the text  = 32.81",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
513,WoS,1295,Characterizing the Economic Value and Impacts of Wild Pig Damage on a Rural Economy,Poudyal et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Tenessee,Site,2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,4600000,,,4757254.051,4757254.051,4600000,4757254.051,4757254.051,USD,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total ""net cost"" : table 2 gives total labour impact = 7.07 million dollars BUT table 3 gives total benefits = 2.47 million dollars output => total in the text  = 4.6 million dollars",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
514,TC,269,"Economic estimate of wild pig damage to farmland owners in Alabama. Proceedings of the 2010 international wild pig symposium, Pensacola, Florida",Shi et al,,2010,English,Official report,"Poudyal, N. C., Caplenor, C., Joshi, O., Maldonado, C., Muller, L. I., & Yoest, C. (2017). Characterizing the Economic Value and Impacts of Wild Pig Damage on a Rural Economy. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(6), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2017.1368103",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Alabama,Site,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,55000000,,,62840335.62,62840335.62,55000000,62840335.62,62840335.62,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
515,TC,153,2015 Georgia wild pig survey final report,Mengak,,2016,English,Official report,"Poudyal, N. C., Caplenor, C., Joshi, O., Maldonado, C., Muller, L. I., & Yoest, C. (2017). Characterizing the Economic Value and Impacts of Wild Pig Damage on a Rural Economy. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(6), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2017.1368103",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Georgia,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,150610000,,,155943474.8,155943474.8,150610000,155943474.8,155943474.8,USD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Forestry/Health/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,This is the most recent version of the report (prior version in 2013),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
516,TC,425,Monetary estimates of wild hog damage to agricultural producers in Louisiana,Tanger et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Poudyal, N. C., Caplenor, C., Joshi, O., Maldonado, C., Muller, L. I., & Yoest, C. (2017). Characterizing the Economic Value and Impacts of Wild Pig Damage on a Rural Economy. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22(6), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2017.1368103",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Louisiana,Site,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,74000000,,,77863479.86,77863479.86,74000000,77863479.86,77863479.86,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Forestry/Health/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Material available on line at https://www.nacaa.com/journal/index.php?jid=553. Based on survey of 4000 producers extrapolated to whole Louisiana,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
538,WoS,11727,Different portrayals of koalas on Kangaroo Island: What gets whose attention (and what doesn’t),Wilks,,2008,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phascolarctidae,Phascolarctos,Phascolarctos cinereus,,Koala,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,200000,,,190993.1133,217313.9344,200000,190993.1133,217313.9344,AUD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Fundings"" An initial funding input in 1997/98 of over $600 000, of which about one quarter was from the Federal Government, dwindled in subsequent years to $200 000 per annum. """,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
539,WoS,11727,Different portrayals of koalas on Kangaroo Island: What gets whose attention (and what doesn’t),Wilks,,2008,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phascolarctidae,Phascolarctos,Phascolarctos cinereus,,Koala,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,200000,,,190993.1133,217313.9344,200000,190993.1133,217313.9344,AUD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Fundings"" An initial funding input in 1997/98 of over $600 000, of which about one quarter was from the Federal Government, dwindled in subsequent years to $200 000 per annum. """,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
541,WoS,11727,Different portrayals of koalas on Kangaroo Island: What gets whose attention (and what doesn’t),Wilks,,2008,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Diprotodontia,Phascolarctidae,Phascolarctos,Phascolarctos cinereus,,Koala,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Animal),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,650,,,620.7276182,706.2702866,650,620.7276182,706.2702866,AUD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"According to an interviewee who was at that time a senior politician. From publicly available sources this is at least $400 per animal (Sandra Kanck; SA Parliament Hansard, SA Democrats Press Release, 16.09.2004) and that budget item referred to direct costs only",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
543,TC,476,"Proclaimed animal research in South Australia — cost-benefits, future directions and related issues",Henzell,,1989,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,1985-1986,Year,1985,1986,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,2048000,,,3061542.51,3833624.068,2048000,3061542.51,3833624.068,AUD,1986,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Gives detailled calculations (sheep production losses due to presence of goats etc),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
546,TC,476,"Proclaimed animal research in South Australia — cost-benefits, future directions and related issues",Henzell,,1989,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Mus,Mus musculus,,House mouse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,1989,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,2400000,,,3752600.18,3517590.957,2400000,3752600.18,3517590.957,AUD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"damage : 2.4 million AUD a year / Benefits (plague control) = 0.86 million AUD 
-> still $1.54 million / year of damage",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
548,TC,476,"Proclaimed animal research in South Australia — cost-benefits, future directions and related issues",Henzell,,1989,English,Official report,"Williams, K. (1995). Managing vertebrate pests : rabbits., 1–299. Retrieved from https://ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat00006a&AN=melb.b2093380&site=eds-live&scope=site",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,New South Wales,Site,1986-1987,Year,1986,1987,1987,1987,One-time,1120000,,,1751213.417,1641542.447,1120000,1751213.417,1641542.447,AUD,1989,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs of dog-proof barrier (expenditure + maintenance) uses depreciation etc to calculate average annual cost,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
552,GS,283,The slippery slope of exporting invasive species: The case of Himalayan tahr arriving in South America,Flueck,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Hemitragus,Hemitragus jemlahicus,,Himalayan tahr,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,300000,,,337234.6719,312949.2953,300000,337234.6719,312949.2953,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,No reference provided,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
554,GS,44,"Calculation of costs of alien invasive species in Sweden – technical report. SLU, Institutionen för ekonomi, Uppsala, Sweden.",Gren et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Unit (35 km²),2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,17491.30392,13308.49572,100000,17491.30392,13308.49572,SEK,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Amcoff, 2001, Personal communication] ""The cost of the project in half of the area (35 km2) is estimated to 100,000 SEK/year,""
Personnal com. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
555,GS,44,"Calculation of costs of alien invasive species in Sweden – technical report. SLU, Institutionen för ekonomi, Uppsala, Sweden.",Gren et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Unit (35 km²),2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,350000,300000,400000,61219.56371,46579.73502,350000,61219.56371,46579.73502,SEK,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Amcoff, 2007, Personal communication] ""but since the hunters were not paid, a value of the hunting performed by the 4-5 hunters/trappers that were engaged, estimated to between 200,000- 300,000 SEK/year, could be added""
Personnal com. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
557,GS,44,"Calculation of costs of alien invasive species in Sweden – technical report. SLU, Institutionen för ekonomi, Uppsala, Sweden.",Gren et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,47500000,18000000,77000000,7379664.381,7377893.771,47500000,7379664.381,7377893.771,SEK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Lower value; 2,800*4*8*200 SEK. Upper value: 3700*13*8*200 SEK
= nb of mink killed*nb of days*8 hours a day*cost of 200 SEK/hour (justification p.36)
Other estimate : 17 million to 68 million (this range is included in the first method)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
565,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,183277000,,,318342251.3,293643280,183277000,318342251.3,293643280,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 5.13 : The estimate annual cost of rabbits to agriculture in Great Britain
Yield losses : England + Wales + Scotland =  GB
£111,355,000 + £14,957,000 + £56,965,000 = £183,277,000",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
566,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,4344000,,,7545293.407,6959882.627,4344000,7545293.407,6959882.627,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Management costs : England + Wales + Scotland =  GB
£2,322,000 + £424,000 + £1,598,000 = £4,344,000
readjusted at ""today's price"" = 2010 publication year",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
568,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,Wales,Wales,Site,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,23929,,,41563.38074,38301.29553,23929,41563.38074,38301.29553,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Estimate, well detailled. The author considered the price of turkey and geese and multiplied by the number of attacks. It is also divided between England Scotland (and Western isles) & Wales.
""This provided a total cost of £139,294. Data concerning the number of free-range poultry farms also indicates their distribution, with the highest densities found in England.
Therefore this cost is divided between England (£77,506), Scotland (£37,859) and Wales (£23,929). Once the cost of lost poultry production in the Western Isles is included the total cost to Scotland is therefore £111,785""
=> Western Isle = £73926 
=> so total value is 
£139294 + £73926 =  £213220",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
569,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,8000000,,,13895567.97,12817463.4,8000000,13895567.97,12817463.4,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimate. Comprises :
- fencing : £130000 per year (2010 prices) based on a pers. com, adjsuted to inflation
- annual spent for maintenance and other control measures (shelters, habitat work, replanting damage trees...) : £250,000 to £500,000
- control costs by private woodland owners & landowners : 5 million to 10 million GBP / Year
=> estimate control cost for forestry = £8 million annualy (£3.28 million in England £3.92 million in Scotland, and £800,000 in Wales)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
570,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,62017000,,,107720179.8,99362578.47,62017000,107720179.8,99362578.47,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Estimates well detailled (5% damaged etc)
Damage costs : £33,979,000 for Scotland, £21,072,000 for England and £6,966,000 for Wales, a total of £62,017,000",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
576,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,Grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,684802,,,1189464.092,1097178.072,684802,1189464.092,1097178.072,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total yield loss is therefore estimated at £684,802.(detailled according to the type of tree)
(damage distribution: Scotland 20%, Wales 15% and England 65% of the costs)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
577,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,Grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,5412518,,,9401251.469,8671843.922,5412518,9401251.469,8671843.922,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimates well detailled.
""Total costs for squirrel to forestry can therefore be estimated at £6,097,320 annually, ""
(damage distribution: Scotland 20%, Wales 15% and England 65% of the costs)
",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
580,GS,114,Guidelines for eradication of terrestrial vertebrates: a European contribution to the invasive,Genovesi,,2000,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Estonia,,Hiiumaa Island ,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,85000,70000,100000,111474.0135,280056.6704,85000,111474.0135,280056.6704,EUR,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Total cost of the intervention was estimated in 70,000-100,000 Euros."" no reference except of a contact email adress. No sepcification of time or duration of the intervention. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
583,WoS,4498,The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control,Norton and Warburton,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Mustela,Mustela erminea,,Stoat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,5,,,5.170928316,5.065985688,5,5.170928316,5.065985688,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""although more recent unpublished estimates suggest stoat control (lines of kill traps) costs approximately $5""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
585,WoS,4498,The potential for biodiversity offsetting to fund effective invasive species control,Norton and Warburton,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,17,,,17.58115627,17.22435134,17,17.58115627,17.22435134,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Controlling ship rats in forest areas costs about $17 (applying poison baits in bait stations when rodent irruptions are predicted [i.e., when produc- tion of mast is high]).""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
608,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes edwardsi,,Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Central America/Oceania/Pacific islands,USA,,Puerto Rico/Hawaii,Intercontinental,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,50000000,,,71172933.6,,50000000,71172933.6,,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Based on public health damages, killing of poultry in Puerto Rico and Hawaii, extinctions of amphibians and reptiles, and destruction of native birds, we estimate that the mongoose is causing approximately $50 million in damages each year in Puerto Rico and the Hawaiian Islands."" No detail on calculations, no reference => non reproducible",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
609,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,14000000000,,,19928421409,19928421409,14000000000,19928421409,19928421409,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"total damage to U.S. bird population is approximately $14 billion/yr. Based on the estimated number of cats in the US (referenced), the number of birds killed by cats (based on Wisconsin and Virginia data but not references) and the estimated value per bird (referenced, Pimentel and Geiner 1997). ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
611,TC,474,Problems related to animal control,Flowers ,,1979,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Carter, C. N. (1990). Pet population control: another decade without solutions? Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 197(2), 192–195.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1979,1979,Potentially ongoing,180000000,90000000,270000000,607943851.2,607943851.2,180000000,607943851.2,607943851.2,USD,1979,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Feral dog bites, medical expenses in the US",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
612,TC,474,Problems related to animal control,Flowers ,,1979,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Carter, C. N. (1990). Pet population control: another decade without solutions? Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 197(2), 192–195.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1979,1979,Potentially ongoing,500000000,,,1688732920,1688732920,500000000,1688732920,1688732920,USD,1979,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control of feral dogs,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
613,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,14234586.72,14234586.72,10000000,14234586.72,14234586.72,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Based on estimates from Carter (1990), who estimated livestock losses to dog packs in Texas, and conservative estimate of 5 million for the other 49 states : ""In addition to the damages caused by dogs in Texas, and conservatively assuming $5 million for all damages for the other 49 states combined, total losses in livestock kills by dogs per year would be approximately $10 million per year"". The $5million for the other 49 states is not justified => non reproducible",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
614,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,250000000,,,346083749.1,346083749.1,250000000,346083749.1,346083749.1,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The authors based their reports on not found references (Dogs take a big bite out of health care costs, Colburn, 1999; Hospitalizations for Dog Bite Injuries, Quinlan and Sacks, 1999)
Direct and indirect costs due to dog bites. Not sure that this is really an impact from an invasive species",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
615,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Unit (Park),1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,450000,,,640556.4024,640556.4024,450000,640556.4024,640556.4024,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Zuniga, 1999, Personal communication] ""Pig control per park in Hawaii (~1500 pigs/park) (Stone et al. 1992) costs about $150,000/yr . Assuming that the 3 parks in Hawaii have similar pig control problems, the total is $450,000/yr (P. C., R. Zuniga, Cornell University, 1999).""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
616,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,800000000,,,1138766938,1138766938,800000000,1138766938,1138766938,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Nationwide, there are an estimated 4 million feral pigs. Based on environmental and crop damages of about $200 per pig annually (one pig can cause up to $1000 of damages to crops in one night), and assuming that 4 million feral pigs inhabit the United States, the yearly damage amounts to about $800 million/yr."" there is no reference associated with these initial costs. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
617,Go,41,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany,Reinhardt et al,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,4600000,71000,9100000,6917766.613,6054499.876,4600000,6917766.613,6054499.876,EUR,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,617 (NE4587/NE4588/NE4589/685),no,"""Subject to the constraints described in Chapter 3.4, the proportional losses attributed to muskrat-derived echinococcosis are € 4.6 million annually."" no more details. In table 10, this data is reported as ""questionnable data""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
619,Go,41,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany,Reinhardt et al,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,3900000,3000000,5200000,5865062.998,5133162.939,3900000,5865062.998,5133162.939,EUR,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Fishery/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Damage to waterways (data from 1996 and 1997) and commercial fish hatcheries (projections based on data from 3 firms).,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
620,Go,41,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany,Reinhardt et al,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,4306400,3804200,4708600,6476232.64,5668064.841,4306400,6476232.64,5668064.841,EUR,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Trapping costs (control measures: wages for mink trappers + trap costs, table 22)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
623,TC,308,Erhebung über die von Säugetieren und Vögeln in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland an Kulturpflanzen verursachten Schäden,Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft,,1978,German,Official report,"HEIKKILÄ, J. (2006). ECONOMICS OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES: PRE-EMPTIVE VERSUS REACTIVE CONTROL. The University of Helsinki.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,1970s,Year,1970,1979,1970,1979,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,18707233.85,65137662.93,10000000,18707233.85,65137662.93,DEM,1978,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Forestry ,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DEM 10M annually in 1970s, today higher",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
631,WoS,6512,Economic and Environmental Impacts of Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in Southeast Asia,Nghiem et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,Diverse/Unspecified,,Southeastern Asia,Regional,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1950000000,,,2124944244,,1950000000,2124944244,,USD,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 1 : estimates annual losses, results of modeling
""Using Monte-Carlo simulations we estimated that the cost incurred by feral cats preying on birds amounts up to $1.95 billion (5th and 95th percentile: 0.769–3.132 billion) annually across Southeast Asia""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
632,TC,291,Environmental valuation and the Hawaiian economy,Kaiser et al,,1999,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,"Hawaii (Maui, Haleakalä National Park)",Unit (Park),1991,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,One-time,2400000,,,3531664.415,3531664.415,2400000,3531664.415,3531664.415,USD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Example of fencing costs for pig removal in table 3.6 + ""A group of six federal, state, county, and private landowners, was established in 1991 to manage 100,000 acres. A $2.4 million fencing project put in 50 miles of fence, keeping several thousand acres free of havoc-wreaking feral pigs.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
633,TC,291,Environmental valuation and the Hawaiian economy,Kaiser et al,,1999,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii (Külani Prison),Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1999,1999,One-time,43000,36000,50000,63275.65411,63275.65411,43000,63275.65411,63275.65411,USD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Example of fencing costs for pig removal in table 3.6,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
634,TC,291,Environmental valuation and the Hawaiian economy,Kaiser et al,,1999,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii (Pöhakuloa Training Area),Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1999,1999,One-time,276000,,,406141.4078,406141.4078,276000,406141.4078,406141.4078,USD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Example of fencing costs for pig removal in table 3.6,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
635,TC,291,Environmental valuation and the Hawaiian economy,Kaiser et al,,1999,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii (Pälalai Gulch/O‘ahu),Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1999,1999,One-time,75000,,,110364.513,110364.513,75000,110364.513,110364.513,USD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Example of fencing costs for pig removal in table 3.6,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
669,TC,54,Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU,Kettunen et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,5 years (1930s),Period,1930,1935,1930,1935,One-time,2000000,,,3559798.317,3218205.792,400000,711959.6633,643641.1584,GBP,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Huw, 2009, Personal communication] Costs assumed to take place on a 5 years period. In the 1930s (median 1935)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
672,TC,54,Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU,Kettunen et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Malta,,Unspecified,Country,2 years,Period,2007,2009,2007,2009,One-time,280000,,,446211.0317,561903.3893,93333.33333,148737.0106,187301.1298,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[National experts, 2008, Personal communication] Figure reported in Kettunen et al. 2009, page 80 lines 120-121",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
675,WoS,14739,"Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions",Pimentel et al,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,1200000000,,,1661201995,1663215606,1200000000,1661201995,1663215606,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,670/675,no,"Calculation based on rabbit densities and damage per rabbit (from McKillop et al. 1998). However, not all calculations or references are provided.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
682,TC,54,Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU,Kettunen et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Nyctereutes,Nyctereutes procyonoides,,Raccoon dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Lithuania,,Unspecified,Country,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,40000,,,18398.3289,70088.72592,40000,18398.3289,70088.72592,LTL,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[National experts, 2008, Personal communication] Personnal communication from 'national experts' in 2008 but no more details available. ""0.04 Lt/ year "" MUST BE 0.04 MILLIONS LTL (lithuanian currency) / year but impossible to verify ..",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
685,TC,449,Ondatra zibethicus. Species factsheet,DAISIE,,2007,English,Official report,"Kettunen, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., Pagad, S., Starfinger, U., ten Brink, P., & Shine, C. (2009). Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU. Brussels, Belgium. ",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,12400000,,,20063633.23,12777202.88,12400000,20063633.23,12777202.88,EUR,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,617 (NE4587/NE4588/NE4589/685),no,"Data from a DAISIE Sheet. Total land cover of Germany.
""Cause extensive damage to crops, irrigation structures, railroads and dams. In some cases undermine fences or cause bogging of machinery. It has also a potential impact on aquaculture industry. In Germany it is estimated at € 12,4 mln/yr (€ 4.6 mln/yr for sanitary aspects, € 2.3 mln/yr for maintenance of waterways, € 1.9 mln/yr for impacts to hatcheries and fish breeders by damaging ponds and dams. Cost of eradication efforts in Germany estimated at over € 3 mln/yr.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
686,TC,449,Ondatra zibethicus. Species factsheet,DAISIE,,2007,English,Official report,"Kettunen, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., Pagad, S., Starfinger, U., ten Brink, P., & Shine, C. (2009). Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU. Brussels, Belgium. ",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,4854104.813,3091258.76,3000000,4854104.813,3091258.76,EUR,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Data from a DAISIE Sheet. Total land cover of Germany.
""Cause extensive damage to crops, irrigation structures, railroads and dams. In some cases undermine fences or cause bogging of machinery. It has also a potential impact on aquaculture industry. In Germany it is estimated at € 12,4 mln/yr (€ 4.6 mln/yr for sanitary aspects, € 2.3 mln/yr for maintenance of waterways, € 1.9 mln/yr for impacts to hatcheries and fish breeders by damaging ponds and dams. Cost of eradication efforts in Germany estimated at over € 3 mln/yr.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
690,TC,482,"Queensland Government Submission. Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and Arts References Committee. Invasive Species Inquiry",Queensland Government,,2003,English,Official report,"Agtrans Research, & Dawson, N. (2005). Review of Progress on Invasive Species.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,600000000,,,518500996.4,589621736.1,600000000,518500996.4,589621736.1,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Australian impact of rabbits estimated at $600 million before Rabbit Calicivirus (RCV). No reference,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
693,TC,502,"Review of Progress on Invasive Species. Final Report to Department of Environment and Heritage. Commonwealth of Australia, Brisbane",Agtrans and Dawson,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Feral goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Unit (Property),1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,1300,800,1300,1246.065843,1175.267722,1300,1246.065843,1175.267722,AUD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Miller et al. 1998 in Newsome, 2001"". Newsome, 2001 not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
695,TC,482,"Queensland Government Submission. Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and Arts References Committee. Invasive Species Inquiry",Queensland Government,,2003,English,Official report,"Agtrans Research, & Dawson, N. (2005). Review of Progress on Invasive Species.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Queensland,Site,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,12000000,,,10370019.93,11792434.72,12000000,10370019.93,11792434.72,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The full economic impacts of invasive animal species in Queensland have not been calculated, however, feral pigs are estimated to reduce grain production by $12 million annually"". no reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
696,TC,482,"Queensland Government Submission. Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and Arts References Committee. Invasive Species Inquiry",Queensland Government,,2003,English,Official report,"Agtrans Research, & Dawson, N. (2005). Review of Progress on Invasive Species.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European (common) rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Queensland,Site,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,800000,,,691334.6618,786162.3147,800000,691334.6618,786162.3147,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Maintenance of the fence in Queensland, and board costs (Darling Downs-Moreton Rabbit Board). No reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
698,Go,90,The Actual and Potential Economic Impact of Invasive Species on the Adirondack Park : A Preliminary Assessment,Yellow Wood Associates Inc. ,,2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,"New York (Department of Environmental Conservation, region 5)",Site,2011-2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,79497,,,84872.76928,84872.76928,26499,28290.92309,28290.92309,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Eradication of a Eurasian boar crossbreed : ""The labor-hour estimates by the Bureau of Wildlife for this work in FY 2011–2013 (as of 9/20/12) was $52,998.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
699,Go,90,The Actual and Potential Economic Impact of Invasive Species on the Adirondack Park : A Preliminary Assessment,Yellow Wood Associates Inc. ,,2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,"New York (Department of Environmental Conservation, region 5)",Site,2011-2012,Year,2011,2012,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,10000,,,10676.22291,10676.22291,10000,10676.22291,10676.22291,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Agricultural damage estimates in NYSDEC Region 5 for calendar years 2011 and 2012 total $20,000.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
700,Go,90,The Actual and Potential Economic Impact of Invasive Species on the Adirondack Park : A Preliminary Assessment,Yellow Wood Associates Inc. ,,2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,"New York (Department of Environmental Conservation, region 5)",Site,2011-2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,23100,,,24662.07492,24662.07492,7700,8220.691641,8220.691641,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Eradication of a Eurasian boar crossbreed : ""Expenses incurred in the same time period total $15,400 on items such as trail cameras, cell service contracts for the cameras, camera batteries, corn for bait, travel and per diems, ammunition, corral trap materials and construction, volunteer mileage reimbursement, and miscellaneous supplies and materials""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
703,WoS,8777,Economic loss versus ecological gain: The outbreaks of invaded pinewood nematode in China,Yu et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Nematoda,Secernentea,Aphelenchida,Aphelenchidae,Bursaphelenchus,Bursaphelenchus mucronatus,,Pine wood nematode,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,China,,Xiangshan county,Site,1991-2007,Period,1991,2007,1991,2007,Potentially ongoing,30000000,,,32691449.91,60257415.38,1764705.882,1923026.465,3544553.846,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""From 1991 to 2007,  Xiangshan county  has  lost  8.5  millions  pines  due  to  the  PWD (Fig.2), resulting in a loss of 530,000 m3 timber and 30 million US dollars""
Data on the economic loss and treatment costs were obtained through the Offices of Forest Pest Management of China, Zhejiang province, and Xiangshan county (no details of calculations nor traceable references)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
704,TC,604,Traits of masson pine affecting attack of pine wood nematode,Shi et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Yu, M., Xu, X., & Ding, P. (2011). Economic loss versus ecological gain: The outbreaks of invaded pinewood nematode in China. Biological Invasions. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-010-9889-2",Yes,Animalia,Nematoda,Secernentea,Aphelenchida,Aphelenchidae,Bursaphelenchus,Bursaphelenchus mucronatus,,Pine wood nematode,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,China,,Unspecified,Country,1982-2002,Period,1982,2002,1982,2002,Potentially ongoing,2500000000,,,388495547.6,989341642.2,125000000,19424777.38,49467082.11,RMB,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Direct loss to pine wood nematode = 2 500 000 000 RMB (Yang 1995; Zhang and Luo 2003; Wu 2004).
In original paper, Yu et al: ""During 1982–2002, >90,000 ha  pine  forests were infected, resulting in a direct loss of 360 million US dollars (Shi et al.2007 ).""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
720,GS,38,"Biological Invasions as Global Environmental Change. American Scientist, 84(5), 468–478.",Vitousek et al,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea canaliculata,,Golden apple snail,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Asia,Philippines,,Unspecified,Country,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,36550000,27800000,45300000,68569072.8,248459908.8,36550000,68569072.8,248459908.8,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss/Damage repair,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""In 1990, the total cost to farmers was between $27.8 million and $45.3 million, including the costs of picking the rice by hand, replanting destroyed crops and controlling the snail with molluscides and the loss of crop yields"" no reference, other than ""Rosamond Naylor of Stanford University has recently eval- uated the economic costs of the snail invasion in the Philippines"" is provided",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
721,GS,44,"Calculation of costs of alien invasive species in Sweden – technical report. SLU, Institutionen för ekonomi, Uppsala, Sweden.",Gren et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Stylommatophora,Arionidae,Arion,Arion lusitanicus,,Iberian Slug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,247500000,45000000,450000000,43290977.2,32938526.9,247500000,43290977.2,32938526.9,SEK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolation from a survey : cost of 100-1000 SEK / Garden (Wirén, 2006) -> multiplied by number of gardens (according to Statistic Sweden) = 45-450 million SEK/year (loss in NON COMMERCIAL gardens)
this is a technical report realised by the univeristy Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
723,TC,377,Invasions in agriculture: assessing the cost of the golden apple snail in Asia,Naylor,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Reaser, J. K., Meerson, L. a., Cronk, Q., & Poorter, M. D. (2007). Ecological and socioeconomic impacts of invasive alien species in island ecosystems. Environmental Conservation, 34(June), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892907003815",Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea canaliculata,,Golden apple snail,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Asia,Philippines,,Unspecified,Country,1980-1990,Period,1980,1990,1980,1990,Potentially ongoing,812500000,425000000,1200000000,1524278294,5523219587,73863636.36,138570754,502110871.5,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Cumulative (present value) costs of the snail invasion in the Philippines; diverse discount rates 5-10-15%, and damage levels high-moderate",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
724,GS,305,Impacts of Introduced Species in the United States,Simberloff,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Stylommatophora,Achatinidae,Lissachatina,Achatina fulica,,Giant african snail,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,10 years,Period,1986,1996,1986,1996,One-time,1000000,,,1562764.318,1562764.318,100000,156276.4318,156276.4318,USD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Material available on line at http://www.gcrio.org/CONSEQUENCES/vol2no2/article2.html. Cost of eradication campaign. No reference, no date clearly specified. => the chronology of eradication was found on the USDA APHIS website (https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/giant-african-snail/ct_giant_african_snail_home, accessed 28/05/2018), cited in Smith et al. 2014 (from scholar)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
728,TC,326,FERAL PERIL: Queensland’s Introduced Plants and Animals,Emmerson and Mcculloch,,1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Prostigmata,Penthaleidae,Halotydeus,Halotydeus destructor,,Red-legged earth mite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1994,Year,1994,Unspecified,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,200000000,,,241812951.7,254470090.6,200000000,241812951.7,254470090.6,AUD,1994,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The Queensland DPI estimates a screwworm fly invasion would cost producers about $280 million dollars, with the biggest losses incurred in the beef cattle industry"" no clear reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
729,WoS,6512,Economic and Environmental Impacts of Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in Southeast Asia,Nghiem et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea canaliculata,,Golden apple snail,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Asia,Philippines/Thailand/Vietnam,,Unspecified,Regional,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1479950000,821100000,2138800000,1612723710,,1479950000,1612723710,,USD,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 1 : estimates annual losses, results of modeling
""Pomacea canaliculata, commonly known as the golden apple snail, is a serious pest of rice fields throughout Southeast Asia. In the Philippines the annual cost of this snail to rice agriculture was estimated at $731–$2,064 million [29]. We estimated the total annual loss caused by these snails to rice in Thailand and Vietnam as $74.8 million, based on the average gross production value of rice over the last 10 years ($8.4 billion in Thailand and $10.1 billion in Vietnam; FAO 2012), proportion of surveyed locations with serious infestations of snails (density of 1 snail/m2 or more; 19% and 90%), and a damage ratio of 0.7% """,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
731,TC,433,National Strategy and action plan for alien species,Naturvårdsverket,,2008,English,Official report,"Kettunen, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., Pagad, S., Starfinger, U., ten Brink, P., & Shine, C. (2009). Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU. Brussels, Belgium. ",Yes,Animalia,Nematoda,Secernentea,Aphelenchida,Aphelenchidae,Bursaphelenchus,Bursaphelenchus mucronatus,,Pine wood nematode,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,1200000,,,207277.5836,155620.1489,1200000,207277.5836,155620.1489,SEK,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"/!\ the report is in Swedish, thus it is uncertain whether data from Kettunen et al. 2009 are properly reported. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
734,TC,6,"Hawaii’s coqui frog management, research and education plan",Anonymous,,2010,English,Official report,"Olson, C. A., Beard, K. H., & Pitt, W. C. (2012). Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus Planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae). Pacific Science, 66(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2984/66.3.1",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Eleutherodactylidae,Eleutherodactylus,Eleutherodactylus coqui,,Coqui frog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2007,2007,One-time,520000,,,614742.4409,614742.4409,520000,614742.4409,614742.4409,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"520 000 = money given by the state (total = 520 000 + total per region)
Total money spent on coqui frog control and eradication efforts for 2006 – 2007 exceeds 4 million dollars, which includes efforts by the State, Counties, Federal, and private efforts
Total cost ""statewide' 
Reliability ?? ""Anonymous"" , seems to be an offiicial report , but gives costs without refereces (just budget)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
735,TC,6,"Hawaii’s coqui frog management, research and education plan",Anonymous,,2010,English,Official report,"Olson, C. A., Beard, K. H., & Pitt, W. C. (2012). Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus Planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae). Pacific Science, 66(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2984/66.3.1",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Eleutherodactylidae,Eleutherodactylus,Eleutherodactylus coqui,,Coqui frog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2007,2007,One-time,2825000,,,3339706.53,3339706.53,2825000,3339706.53,3339706.53,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Total money spent on coqui frog control and eradication efforts for 2006 – 2007 which includes efforts by the State, Counties, Federal, and private efforts
Total cost Maui
Reliability ?? ""Anonymous"" , seems to be an offiicial report , but gives costs without refereces (just budget)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
736,TC,6,"Hawaii’s coqui frog management, research and education plan",Anonymous,,2010,English,Official report,"Olson, C. A., Beard, K. H., & Pitt, W. C. (2012). Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus Planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae). Pacific Science, 66(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2984/66.3.1",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Eleutherodactylidae,Eleutherodactylus,Eleutherodactylus coqui,,Coqui frog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2007,2007,One-time,321500,,,380076.3361,380076.3361,321500,380076.3361,380076.3361,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Total money spent on coqui frog control and eradication efforts for 2006 – 2007 which includes efforts by the State, Counties, Federal, and private efforts
Total cost Maui
Reliability ?? ""Anonymous"" , seems to be an offiicial report , but gives costs without refereces (just budget)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
737,TC,6,"Hawaii’s coqui frog management, research and education plan",Anonymous,,2010,English,Official report,"Olson, C. A., Beard, K. H., & Pitt, W. C. (2012). Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus Planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae). Pacific Science, 66(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2984/66.3.1",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Eleutherodactylidae,Eleutherodactylus,Eleutherodactylus coqui,,Coqui frog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2007,2007,One-time,116000,,,137134.8522,137134.8522,116000,137134.8522,137134.8522,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Total money spent on coqui frog control and eradication efforts for 2006 – 2007  includes efforts by the State, Counties, Federal, and private efforts
Total cost Oahu
Reliability ?? ""Anonymous"" , seems to be an offiicial report , but gives costs without refereces (just budget)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
738,TC,6,"Hawaii’s coqui frog management, research and education plan",Anonymous,,2010,English,Official report,"Olson, C. A., Beard, K. H., & Pitt, W. C. (2012). Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus Planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae). Pacific Science, 66(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2984/66.3.1",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Eleutherodactylidae,Eleutherodactylus,Eleutherodactylus coqui,,Coqui frog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2007,2007,One-time,466000,,,550903.8028,550903.8028,466000,550903.8028,550903.8028,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Total money spent on coqui frog control and eradication efforts for 2006 – 2007  includes efforts by the State, Counties, Federal, and private efforts
Total cost Kauai
Reliability ?? ""Anonymous"" , seems to be an offiicial report , but gives costs without refereces (just budget)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
751,WoS,9597,Invasive reptiles and amphibians,Moutou and Pastoret,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,29000,,,50371.43389,46463.30483,29000,50371.43389,46463.30483,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eradication in the UK; no more details,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
752,WoS,9597,Invasive reptiles and amphibians,Moutou and Pastoret,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,2500000,,,2396280.468,2260130.235,2500000,2396280.468,2260130.235,AUD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Report (no reference, just gives the value as a fact)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
753,WoS,6933,Control of invasive American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus in small shallow water bodies,Louette et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Belgium,,Unspecified,Unit (Pond),Summer 2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4029,1848,6210,5628.758061,3960.606118,4029,5628.758061,3960.606118,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The authors predicted the time needed and the monetary cost involved in depleting a bullfrog tadpole population in a given water body (assuming no further reproduction) at the end of the summer using various catch intensities. They considered three different intensity levels of removal for two contrasting starting abundances (a low population abundance of 1,000 tadpoles and a high population abundance of 5,000 tadpoles) and different intensities of fyke nets at each catch effort (total cost covered staff time of two collaborators (transport to a given pond and actual field work) and depreciation of equipment): two double fyke nets with a total cost of 138 € per catch effort, five double fyke nets (308 €/catch effort) and eight double fyke nets (478 €/catch effort).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
756,WoS,8014,Species Invasion as Catastrophe: The Case of the Brown Tree Snake,Burnett et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,2600000,,,2775817.957,2775817.957,2600000,2775817.957,2775817.957,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Current annual prevention investment in Hawaii,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
763,WoS,1908,Betrayal: radio-tagged Burmese pythons reveal locations of conspecifics in Everglades National Park,Smith et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Pythonidae,Python,Python bivittatus,,Burmese python,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Everglades national park,Unit (Park),Breeding seasons (2007-2011),Period,2007,2011,2007,2011,One-time,154400,,,157688.8898,157688.8898,30880,31537.77797,31537.77797,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Includes cost of using the Judas technique and road cruising ($11029/python for Judas technique; $6466/python for road cruising) + detilled cost for material, technician costs etc
Average per season (they track the snakes only during breeding seasons, as they are solitary animals) 2007-2011",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
766,WoS,2831,Development of artificial bait for brown treesnake suppression,Kimball et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,,Guam,Unit (Bait),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,0.14,,,0.142982154,0.142982154,0.14,0.142982154,0.142982154,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Price per baits fashioned with an artificial lipid mixture
""over two million bait would be required""
--> calculation of the cost ??",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
767,WoS,2831,Development of artificial bait for brown treesnake suppression,Kimball et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,,Guam,Unit (Bait),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,One-time,0.525,0.45,0.6,0.536183078,0.536183078,0.525,0.536183078,0.536183078,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Price per baits using dead neonatal mice (DNM) ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
769,GS,300,"Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species: 2. Boiga irregularis, the Brown Tree Snake (Reptilia: Colubridae)",Rodda and Savidge,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,,Guam ,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1500000,1000000,2000000,1773295.503,1773295.503,1500000,1773295.503,1773295.503,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Daniel , 2007, Personal communication] From the paper ""The military community experiences many of the same burdens from the Brown Tree Snake as do civilians (power outages, enveno-mations, loss of pets, difficulties recruiting employees from off island, etc.), and it also pays Wildlife Services for the costs ($1–2 million/yr) of inspecting materials shipped from Guam. The U.S. Department of Defense is the source of the majority of cargo leaving Guam (Daniel Vice, pers. comm.).""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
770,GS,300,"Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species: 2. Boiga irregularis, the Brown Tree Snake (Reptilia: Colubridae)",Rodda and Savidge,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1000000000,500000000,1500000000,1182197002,1182197002,1000000000,1182197002,1182197002,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Shwiff, 2007, Personal communication] Preliminary cost estimates for tourism impacts should the Brown Tree Snake reach Hawai‘i are in the range $0.5–1.5 billion annually (S. Shwiff, pers. comm.).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
771,TC,8,Issues associated with the progressive entry into the Northern Territory of cane toads,Anonymous,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Northern Territory,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,46508,,,40190.74056,45703.54617,46508,40190.74056,45703.54617,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Committee’s salaries and administration expenses for the conduct of the present inquiry (report),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
772,TC,8,Issues associated with the progressive entry into the Northern Territory of cane toads,Anonymous,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Northern Territory,Site,10 years,Period,1993,2003,1993,2003,One-time,4700000,,,4061591.138,4618703.599,470000,406159.1138,461870.3599,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Commonwealth funding : All funding amounts are approximations. The Committee found it difficult to get clear and accurate figures. Cane toad fundings seem to be estimated on the basis of funding for research on feral rabbits, but no calculation or details are given
""For cane toads, over about a ten year period the total contribution made mainly by the Commonwealth is approximately $4.7 million.   
Beginning in 1990 the Commonwealth provided $ 1.25 million over three years with some of the States contributing a further $90,000.  
In 1993 the Commonwealth provided an additional $2 million to the  program that finished in December 1996.  
In 1996/1997, the first year of the Natural Heritage Trust, the Commonwealth provided $120,000 to fund the program to June 1997 to finalise some work not previously finished.  
Since 2000 the Commonwealth has provided approximately $1.5 million from the Natural Heritage Trust to support a new biological control program with CSIRO""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
773,TC,8,Issues associated with the progressive entry into the Northern Territory of cane toads,Anonymous,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Northern Territory,Site,1989-2003,Period,1989,2003,1989,2003,One-time,478700,,,413677.3783,470419.8751,31913.33333,27578.49188,31361.32501,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Northern territory funding : from the Northern Territory Legislative Assembly Parliamentary Records for the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Assemblies
Details of the budget",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
774,TC,8,Issues associated with the progressive entry into the Northern Territory of cane toads,Anonymous ,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Tiwi Islands,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,230000,,,198758.7153,226021.6655,230000,198758.7153,226021.6655,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"personnal communication from the Tiwi Land Council  
150 000 + 80 000 (funds from Aboriginal Benefits Account and Indigenous Land Corporation for quarantine facilities)
300 000 necessary for consistent quarantine facilities",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
796,TC,157,A review of the impact and control of cane toads in Australia with recommendations for future research and management approaches,Alford et al,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia/Brazil/Venezuela,,Unspecified,Intercontinental,1990-1997 + 2 years in early 2000s,Period,1990,1997,1990,1997,One-time,3400000,,,3258941.437,,425000,407367.6796,,AUD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"From 1990 to 1993, Australian researchers embarked on a $1.25 million project to investigate the ecology of cane toads in Venezuela, Brazil and Australia. 
From 1993 to 1997, a further $2 million was spent in this area.
In early 2000, Senator Robert Hill, the then Minister for the Environment and Heritage, lent his support to ongoing funding of research into possible biological controls for cane toads ($1 million over two years).
/!\ No reference provided.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
799,TC,601,"Threat abatement plan for the biological effects, including lethal toxic ingestion, caused by cane toads","Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australian government",,2010,English,Official report,"Shine, R., & Doody, J. S. (2011). Invasive species control: Understanding conflicts between researchers and the general community. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(7), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1890/100090",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1986-2009,Period,1986,2009,1986,2009,One-time,17627675,,,18176738.57,13198756.55,734486.4583,757364.1071,549948.1896,AUD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"See Table 1. Detailed, but no other reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
800,TC,601,"Threat abatement plan for the biological effects, including lethal toxic ingestion, caused by cane toads","Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australian government",,2010,English,Official report,"Shine, R., & Doody, J. S. (2011). Invasive species control: Understanding conflicts between researchers and the general community. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(7), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1890/100090",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1986-2009,Period,1986,2009,1986,2009,One-time,2445351,,,2521518.342,1830961.402,101889.625,105063.2642,76290.0584,AUD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"See Table 1. Detailed, but no other reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
801,TC,601,"Threat abatement plan for the biological effects, including lethal toxic ingestion, caused by cane toads","Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australian government",,2010,English,Official report,"Shine, R., & Doody, J. S. (2011). Invasive species control: Understanding conflicts between researchers and the general community. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(7), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1890/100090",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1986-2009,Period,1986,2009,1986,2009,One-time,44468,,,45853.08106,33295.50302,1852.833333,1910.545044,1387.312626,AUD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"See Table 1. Detailed, but no other reference. under the section ""education""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
802,TC,601,"Threat abatement plan for the biological effects, including lethal toxic ingestion, caused by cane toads","Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Australian government",,2010,English,Official report,"Shine, R., & Doody, J. S. (2011). Invasive species control: Understanding conflicts between researchers and the general community. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9(7), 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1890/100090",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2008-2010,Period,2008,2010,2008,2010,One-time,2000000,,,2062295.631,1497503.959,666666.6667,687431.8771,499167.9863,AUD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Over the financial years 2008/2009 and 2009/2010, $2 million of funding under Caring for our Country was allocated to both the development of this TAP and a set of projects designed to meet the Caring for our Country business plan targets on cane toads.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
805,TC,453,Optimal prevention and control of invasive species: the case of the Brown Treesnake,Burnett,,2007,English,Thesis,"D’Evelyn, S. T., Tarui, N., Burnett, K., & Roumasset, J. A. (2008). Learning-by-catching: Uncertain invasive-species populations and the value of information. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.027",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,2600000,,,3073712.205,3073712.205,2600000,3073712.205,3073712.205,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Current prevention expenditures in Hawaii. Found through ""conversations with Brown tree snake managers and scientists""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
806,TC,453,Optimal prevention and control of invasive species: the case of the Brown Treesnake,Burnett,,2007,English,Thesis,"D’Evelyn, S. T., Tarui, N., Burnett, K., & Roumasset, J. A. (2008). Learning-by-catching: Uncertain invasive-species populations and the value of information. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(4), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.027",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,76000,,,89846.97214,89846.97214,76000,89846.97214,89846.97214,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Current control expenditures in Hawaii. Found through ""conversations with Brown tree snake managers and scientists""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
809,GS,187,Just Green Iguanas? The associated costs and policy implications of exotic invasive wildlife in South Florida,Sementelli et al,,2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Iguanidae,Iguana,Iguana iguana,,Green iguana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,South Florida,Unit (Hole),2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,400,,,455.3957029,455.3957029,400,455.3957029,455.3957029,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"cost to repair burrow holes from Iguanas. ""On the basis of focus group discussions with service direc- tors, civil engineers, construction professionals, and water managers, the estimated cost to properly repair each hole was estimated to be approximately $400"". No reference or details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
818,GS,296,Why DOD is interested in invasive species,Dalsimer,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1362721.798,1362721.798,1000000,1362721.798,1362721.798,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Funding to the Armed Forces Pest Management Board (AFPMB), $1 million per year specifi- cally for operational BTS control",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
820,TC,480,Protecting Hawaii from Invasive Pests,Coordinating Group on Alien Pest Species,,2001,English,Official report,"IKUMA, E. K., SUGANO, D., & MARDFIN, J. K. (2002). Filling the Gaps in the Fight Against Invasive Species. Honolulu, Hawaii.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,1600000,,,2443305.991,2443305.991,1600000,2443305.991,2443305.991,USD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Federal funding for BTS in 1997,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
821,TC,480,Protecting Hawaii from Invasive Pests,Coordinating Group on Alien Pest Species,,2001,English,Official report,"IKUMA, E. K., SUGANO, D., & MARDFIN, J. K. (2002). Filling the Gaps in the Fight Against Invasive Species. Honolulu, Hawaii.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,3600000,,,5413407.29,5413407.29,3600000,5413407.29,5413407.29,USD,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,NA,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
822,GS,100,Filling the Gaps in the Fight Against Invasive Species,Ikuma et al,,2002,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,,Guam,Site,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1362721.798,1362721.798,1000000,1362721.798,1362721.798,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The infamous brown tree snake has all but devastated Guam ecologically in recent years and causes an estimated $1 million in economic damages annually. No reference associated, not reproducible""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
823,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,,Guam,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1423458.672,1423458.672,1000000,1423458.672,1423458.672,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""One island-wide power outage caused by the snake cost the power utility more than $250,000 (Teodosio 1987). Local outages that affect businesses are estimated to cost from $2,000 to $10,000 per commercial customer (Coulehan 1987). With about 86 outages per year (BTSCP 1996), our estimate of the cost of snake-related power outages is conservatively $1 million/yr"". no clear explanation of the calculations => non reproducible",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
824,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,,Guam,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,25000,,,35586.4668,35586.4668,25000,35586.4668,35586.4668,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Some bitten infants require hospitalization and intensive care, at an estimated total cost of $25,000 per year"" no details or references",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
825,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,,Guam,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,2846917.344,2846917.344,2000000,2846917.344,2846917.344,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,no reference or details,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
827,Go,41,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany,Reinhardt et al,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Unit (5 ponds),2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,270000,260000,520000,406042.823,355372.8188,270000,406042.823,355372.8188,EUR,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,827(834),no,Control costs for 5 ponds,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
838,WoS,1108,"Eradication of common mynas Acridotheres tristis from Denis Island, Seychelles",Feare et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Sturnidae,Acridotheres,Acridotheres tristis,,Common myna,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Seychelles,,Denis Island,Site,5 years (2010-2015),Period,2010,2015,2010,2015,One-time,784750,,,784750,1465965.175,156950,156950,293193.035,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The eradication was undertaken in three phases, overall killing 1186mynas and lasting 5 years. 3 eradications : 2010 + 2011 + 2015.
Total cost of eradication includes fees and transport for specialist consultants, training and the hunter, equipment, project management in Seychelles and overheads",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
842,TC,238,Damage to standing maize crop in Pakistan by Rose-ringed Parakeet (Psittacula krameri),Khan and Hussain,,1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,Pakistan,,Punjab ,Site,1985-1986,Year,1985,1986,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,69660000,,,6020285.079,32461599.07,69660000,6020285.079,32461599.07,PKR,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Loss in maize production in the Punjab province = 30958 mt => monetary loss = Quantity x maize value = 69.66 million Rs (Rupees) = PKR,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
843,TC,238,Damage to standing maize crop in Pakistan by Rose-ringed Parakeet (Psittacula krameri),Khan and Hussain,,1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,Pakistan,,North-West Frontier Province,Site,1985-1986,Year,1985,1986,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,44750000,,,3867467.087,20853525.1,44750000,3867467.087,20853525.1,PKR,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Loss in maize production in NWFP province = 19888.6 mt => monetary loss = Quantity x maize value = 44.75 million Rs (Rupees) (monetary symbol PKR),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
845,TC,427,Monk Parakeet Management at Electric Utility Facilities in South Florida,Avery et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Monk parakeet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,South Florida,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,556000,,,757673.3194,757673.3194,556000,757673.3194,757673.3194,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Hodges and Newman, 2002, Unpublished data] Monk Parakeet native from South America but established in several places in the USA, including south florida. 
Revenue loss due =  $19,000 in 2001 (loss due to outages). Cost for repair of outages estimated to 556 000 annualy ($551 per accident, including $136 for system resetting repair + $415 for nest removal).
=> In 2001 total estimated costs associated with outages = $585 000 (570$/outage)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
846,TC,427,Monk Parakeet Management at Electric Utility Facilities in South Florida,Avery et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Monk parakeet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,South Florida,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,37000,,,50420.70651,50420.70651,37000,50420.70651,50420.70651,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Hodges and Newman, 2002, Unpublished data] Cost of removing 90 monk parakeet nests in 2001 in South Florida",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
847,TC,427,Monk Parakeet Management at Electric Utility Facilities in South Florida,Avery et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Monk parakeet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,South Florida,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,One-time,460650,,,627737.796,627737.796,460650,627737.796,627737.796,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Hodges and Newman, 2002, Unpublished data] Potential cost of removing all existing nests in South Florida",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
849,TC,246,Diazacon inhibits reproduction in invasive Monk Parakeet populations.,Avery et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Burgio, K. R., Kramer, D., Rubega, M. A., & Sustaita, D. (2014). Nest-building behavior of Monk Parakeets and insights into potential mechanisms for reducing damage to utility poles. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.601",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Monk parakeet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,South Florida,Site,5 years,Period,2002,2007,2002,2007,One-time,3000000,1300000,4700000,3546591.005,3546591.005,600000,709318.2011,709318.2011,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"control (removal) :  ""Nest removal is estimated to cost $415 to $1,500 (United States currency) per nest (Hodges and Newman 2002). Thus, in the past 5 years, the cost of nest removal alone is estimated to be $1.3 to $4.7 million. (Since 2003, approximately 3,126 nests have been removed from utility structures in south Florida (J. R. Lindsay, Florida Power and Light Company, personal communication)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
851,TC,313,Estimation of grain loss to sparrows (Passer domesticus) in New Zealand,Dawson,,1970,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Macgregor-Fors, I., Calderón-Parra, R., Meléndez-Herrada, A., López-López, S., & Schondube, J. E. (2011). Pretty, but dangerous! Records of non-native Monk Parakeets (Myiopsitta monachus) in Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, 82, 1053–1056. Retrieved from http://www.ib.unam.mx/m/revista/pdfs/34-739.pdf ID8523",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Passeridae,Passer,Passer domesticus,,House sparrow,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1968,Year,1968,Unspecified,1968,1968,Potentially ongoing,28500,13000,44000,201525.2634,337331.3975,28500,201525.2634,337331.3975,NZD,1970,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Eleven wheat crops were surveyed in Hawke's Bay in 1968. The results suggest that house sparrows took between 2.6 -8.4% of the grain produced (about 320000 bushels) valued at NZ.$1.50 each. = 13 000 - 44 000 NZD,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
856,TC,491,"Reducing Risk and Enhancing Efficiency in Non-Native Vertebrate Removal Efforts on Islands: A 25 Year Multi-Taxa Retrospective from Santa Cruz Island, California",Morrison,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348?needAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Accipitriformes,Accipitridae,Aquila,Aquila chrysaetos,,Golden eagle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Northern Channel Islands,Site,1999-2001,Period,1999,2001,1999,2001,One-time,795000,,,939846.6164,939846.6164,265000,313282.2055,313282.2055,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The author assessed that this species is invasive, but the latter is not recognized as such by any official organisation or other referenced paper. From the text ""There is no evidence that golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) were breeding residents on Santa Cruz Island prior to the 1990s. By the end of that decade, however, multiple pairs had established territories on the island. Impact on fox prey"" => endangered fox.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
857,TC,491,"Reducing Risk and Enhancing Efficiency in Non-Native Vertebrate Removal Efforts on Islands: A 25 Year Multi-Taxa Retrospective from Santa Cruz Island, California",Morrison,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348?needAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Accipitriformes,Accipitridae,Aquila,Aquila chrysaetos,,Golden eagle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Northern Channel Islands,Site,2002-2004,Period,2002,2004,2002,2004,One-time,1518000,,,1794575.049,1794575.049,506000,598191.6829,598191.6829,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The author assessed that this species is invasive, but the latter is not recognized as such by any official organisation or other referenced paper. From the text ""There is no evidence that golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos) were breeding residents on Santa Cruz Island prior to the 1990s. By the end of that decade, however, multiple pairs had established territories on the island. Impact on fox prey"" => endangered fox.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
858,TC,491,"Reducing Risk and Enhancing Efficiency in Non-Native Vertebrate Removal Efforts on Islands: A 25 Year Multi-Taxa Retrospective from Santa Cruz Island, California",Morrison,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348?needAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Accipitriformes,Accipitridae,Aquila,Aquila chrysaetos,,Golden eagle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Northern Channel Islands,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,481000,,,568636.7579,568636.7579,481000,568636.7579,568636.7579,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"/!\ this is only the available budget, no info about whether it was used or not
""In 2005, with an available budget of $481,000, one eagle was captured.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
859,TC,491,"Reducing Risk and Enhancing Efficiency in Non-Native Vertebrate Removal Efforts on Islands: A 25 Year Multi-Taxa Retrospective from Santa Cruz Island, California",Morrison,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Towns, D. R., & Broome, K. G. (2003). From small Maria to massive Campbell: forty years of rat eradications from New Zealand islands. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 30, 377–398. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03014223.2003.9518348?needAccess=true",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Galliformes,Phasianidae,Meleagris,Meleagris gallopavo,,Wild Turkey,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Santa Cruz Island,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,55000,,,65020.8351,65020.8351,55000,65020.8351,65020.8351,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"No reference or details. ""(…) Cost of this program has been approximately $55,000""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
863,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Sturnidae,Sturnus,Sturnus vulgaris,,Common starling,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,800000000,,,1138766938,1138766938,800000000,1138766938,1138766938,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Conservative estimate, $5/ha for all damages to many crops in the US. No clear reference to these $5/ha, nor to the surface of affected crops",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
866,TC,523,Starlings in Western Australia: assessing the likely cost of an incursion,ACIL Economics and Policy Pty Ltd.,,2007,English,Official report,"Campbell, S., Cook, S., Mortimer, L., Palmer, G., Sinclair, R., & Woolnough, A. P. (2012). To catch a starling: Testing the effectiveness of different trap and lure types. Wildlife Research, 39(3), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR11115",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Sturnidae,Sturnus,Sturnus vulgaris,,Common starling,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Western Australia,Site,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2007,2007,One-time,2950000,,,2918217.226,2444021.038,2950000,2918217.226,2444021.038,AUD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Investment of the Western Australian Governement for an enhanced surveillance, research and control program",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
867,TC,523,Starlings in Western Australia: assessing the likely cost of an incursion,ACIL Economics and Policy Pty Ltd.,,2006,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Sturnidae,Sturnus,Sturnus vulgaris,,Common starling,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,1500000,,,1823881.816,1823881.816,1500000,1823881.816,1823881.816,USD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,[United States Departement of Agriculture] Estimate of starlings damage made by US Department of Agriculture. No reference is provided in the citing paper ACIL ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
871,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1324103,,,2299895.404,2121455.218,1324103,2299895.404,2121455.218,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Damage per goose x Nb of individuals. No significant damage in Wales & Scotland.
""Therefore with a population of 88,866 and a cost of damage of £14.90 per goose, a cost of £1,324,103 is attributed to England.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
872,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Cygnus,Cygnus olor,,Mute swan,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,25316,,,43972.52484,40560.86293,25316,43972.52484,40560.86293,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Damage per swan x Nb of individuals
""an average of £26.62 damage per swan. (...) an estimated 951 swans cause £25,316 of damage per annum (£10,126 England, £10,126 Scotland and £5,064 Wales)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
883,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Columbiformes,Columbidae,Columba,Columba livia,,Pigeon biset,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,1100000000,,,1565804539,1565804539,1100000000,1565804539,1565804539,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""The control costs of pigeons are at least $9 per pigeon per year (Haag-Wackernagel 1995). Assuming 1 pigeon per ha in urban areas (Johnston and Janiga 1995) or approximately 0.5 pigeons per person, and using potential control costs as a surrogate for losses, pigeons cause an estimated $1.1 billion/yr in damages"". There is no clear calculation (ha of urban areas Unknown number of persons Unknown)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
884,TC,308,Erhebung über die von Säugetieren und Vögeln in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland an Kulturpflanzen verursachten Schäden,Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft,,1978,German,Official report,"HEIKKILÄ, J. (2006). ECONOMICS OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES: PRE-EMPTIVE VERSUS REACTIVE CONTROL. The University of Helsinki.",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Galliformes,Phasianidae,Phasianus,Phasianus colchicus,,Pheasant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,1978,Year,1978,Unspecified,1978,1978,Potentially ongoing,2500000,,,4676808.463,16284415.73,2500000,4676808.463,16284415.73,DEM,1978,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Damage to vegetable fields, vineyards and seeds and seedlings in corn fields",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
892,WoS,14739,"Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal, and microbe invasions",Pimentel et al,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,none,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Columbiformes,Columbidae,Columba,Columba livia,,Pigeon biset,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,270000000,,,373770449,"374223511,3",270000000,373770449,"374223511,3",USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"There is no reference or calculations regarding these costs. In the paper, costs are described as environmental costs. With regards to our impact sector categories however, it would rather fit with infrastructure and agricultural costs /!\ no correction for inflation, 2001 as date is assumed.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1077,TC,304,"Eradication of the Little Fire Ant, Wasmannia Auropunctata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), From Marchena Island, Galápagos: on the Edge of Success?",Causton et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Wasmannia,Wasmannia auropunctata,,Little fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Marchena Island (Galapagos),Unit (6 Ha),2001-2005,Period,2001,2005,2001,2005,One-time,212736,,,267014.7711,677206.2718,42547.2,53402.95423,135441.2544,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"treatment in one island in the galapagos. Purchase and shipping of Ambro ® = $10,700 + $ 13,680/Ha + Personnel cost (47%)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1089,WoS,9385,A spatial-dynamic value transfer model of economic losses from a biological invasion,Holmes et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Adelgidae,Adelges,Adelges tsugae,,Hemlock woolly adelgid ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Eastern USA,Site,1999–2008,Period,1999,2008,1999,2008,Potentially ongoing,20945500,12393000,29498000,25468077.71,25468077.71,2094550,2546807.771,2546807.771,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The aggregate estimate of residential property value losses, computed by summing the county-level estimates under three different scenarios (low, medium, high damage spread). Here, low and high scenario are presented",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1092,TC,589,The potential economic impact of Drosophila suzukii on small fruits production in Trentino (Italy),De Ros et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Del Fava, E., Ioriatti, C., & Melegaro, A. (2017). Cost–benefit analysis of controlling the spotted wing drosophila (Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura)) spread and infestation of soft fruits in Trentino, Northern Italy. Pest Management Science, 73(11), 2318–2327. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4618",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Lauxaniidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Trentino,Site,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,3300000,,,4610300.72,3546983.429,3300000,4610300.72,3546983.429,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,1092/SC1253,no,"The first few studies were set out to quantify the economic impact in the absence  of  management, and  estimated the  expected  revenue  losses,  given the  observed yield losses. In particular, it was found that, based on a 20% yield loss for strawberries, 16  raspberries, blackberries, blueberries and cherries, total revenue losses could amount to $511 000 000  per  year in  the  US. Similarly, considering the  weekly  reported  yield  losses  in  Trentino  in  2011, 18  total revenues  losses were estimated to €3.3 million.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1104,TC,431,Myiasis: The battle continues against screwworm infestation,Reichard et al,,1993,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Myers, J. H., Savoie, A., & Van Randen, E. (1998). ERADICATION AND PEST MANAGEMENT. Annu. Rev. Entomol, 43, 471–91. (ID15710)",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Calliphoridae,Cochliomyia,Cochliomyia hominivorax,,New World Screwworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Mexico/USA,,Unspecified,Regional,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1993,1993,One-time,750000000,,,1272613931,,750000000,1272613931,,USD,1993,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pest on the livestock. No reference, no caclulation",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1110,TC,576,The future of the mediterranean fruit fly Ceratitis capitata invasion of California: a predictive framework,Carey,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Myers, J. H., Savoie, A., & Van Randen, E. (1998). ERADICATION AND PEST MANAGEMENT. Annu. Rev. Entomol, 43, 471–91. (ID15710)",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Ceratitis,Ceratitis capitata,,Mediterranean fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,1980s,Period,1980,1989,1980,1989,One-time,1000000000,,,1562764318,1562764318,100000000,156276431.8,156276431.8,USD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Can't find none of the original cited papers (Lindquist & Nadel, 1980; Scribner, 1983 (book); USDA, 1987)
* Scribner, J. (1983). The medfly in California: organization of the eradication program and public policy. Hortic. Sci., 18, 47-52
* Lindquist, D. A. & Nadel, D. J. (1980). Report on northern California (USA) medfly eradication programme (covering the period 19 June 1980-10 July 1981). Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Isotope and Radiation Applications of Atomic Energy for Food and Agricultural Development. IAEA and FAO, Vienna, Austria
* USDA (1987). An analysis of the Mediterranean fruit fly erad- ication program in California, 1980-82. USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1111,TC,567,"The economics of insect control on wheat, corn, and canola in Canada, 1980–1985",Madder and Stemeroff,,1988,English,Official report,"Dosdall, L. M., Cárcamo, H., Olfert, O., Meers, S., Hartley, S., & Gavloski, J. (2011). Insect invasions of agroecosystems in the western Canadian prairies: case histories, patterns, and implications for ecosystem function. Biological Invasions, 13, 1135–1149. (ID8837)",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Phyllotreta,Phyllotreta cruciferae,,Crucifer flea beetle/Striped flea beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Western Canadian agroecosystems,Site,1980-1985,Year,1980,1985,1980,1985,One-time,700240,,,1179337.287,1176551.835,700240,1179337.287,1176551.835,CAD,1988,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Insecticide costs and application costs only. The provided $300M (Dosdall et al. 2011) is absent from the original article (Madder and Stemeroff 1988). The calculated cost from the original paper, including inflation factor, is 10 times lower. Even the upper bound summed cost for 6 years is lower than the annual estimate provided by Dosdall et al. 2011 /!\ estimates only for flea beetles on canola.
(CA$13301846-19778819inBORIS)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1115,WoS,1134,"Walnut husk fly, Rhagoletis completa (Diptera: Tephritidae), invades Europe: invasion potential and control strategies",Verheggen et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Rhagoletis,Rhagoletis completa,,Walnut husk fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2017,Year,2017,Unspecified,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,180,,,199.1073073,,180,199.1073073,,EUR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of treatments in conventional orchards in Europe (annual treatment assumed). No reference. ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1116,WoS,1134,"Walnut husk fly, Rhagoletis completa (Diptera: Tephritidae), invades Europe: invasion potential and control strategies",Verheggen et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Rhagoletis,Rhagoletis completa,,Walnut husk fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2017,Year,2017,Unspecified,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,688,,,761.0323744,,688,761.0323744,,EUR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of treatments in organic orchards in Europe (annual treatment assumed). No reference.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1118,WoS,7774,"Invasion of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, in China: dispersal, occurrence, and economic impact",Liu et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Leptinotarsa,Leptinotarsa decemlineata,,Colorado potato beetle ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,China,,Unspecified,Country,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1300000,,,1300000,2475204.921,1300000,1300000,2475204.921,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The current agricultural loss caused by CPB was 1.3 million USD/year and the current control cost 1.9 million USD/year (Table 2). Thus, the current economic loss of CPB in China was 3.2 million USD/year.
Methods and data detailed in appendix
Exchange rate of ?RMB 6.8260 yuan:1 USD corresponds to data from the European Central Bank, Reference Rates 1999-2017 (average rate between 1999-2017). Initial market price data are from 2007, which is why we define 2007 as the date of data acquisition",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1119,WoS,7774,"Invasion of Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, in China: dispersal, occurrence, and economic impact",Liu et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Leptinotarsa,Leptinotarsa decemlineata,,Colorado potato beetle ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,China,,Unspecified,Country,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1900000,,,1900000,3617607.193,1900000,1900000,3617607.193,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The current agricultural loss caused by CPB was 1.3 million USD/year and the current control cost 1.9 million USD/year (Table 2). Thus, the current economic loss of CPB in China was 3.2 million USD/year.
Methods and data detailed in appendix
Exchange rate of ?RMB 6.8260 yuan:1 USD corresponds to data from the European Central Bank, Reference Rates 1999-2017 (average rate between 1999-2017). Initial market price data are from 2007, which is why we define 2007 as the date of data acquisition",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1132,WoS,7904,Optimal control of soybean aphid in the presence of natural enemies and the implied value of their ecosystem services,Zhang et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Aphis,Aphis glycines,,Soybean aphids,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Iowa/Illinois/Indiana/Michigan/Minnesota,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2012,2012,One-time,47500000,11000000,84000000,59619442.07,59619442.07,47500000,59619442.07,59619442.07,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Aggregate value of the natural control of SBA by natural enemies for 2005. Valuation of ecosystem services provided by natural enemies. New dynamic optimal control model that innovates the natural enemy-adjusted economic threshold (NEET) applied to the soybean aphid pest : optimal management with the NEET compared to static economic action threshold that ignores the presence of natural ennemies.
Benefits :
""84 000 000 for the moderate infestation case
11 000 000 for the severe case""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1139,WoS,11817,"Potential economic impact of introduction and spread of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, in Hawaii",Gutrich et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2001-2007,Period,2001,2007,2001,2007,One-time,9000000,,,7819480.206,7068179.504,1285714.286,1117068.601,1009739.929,NZD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Sarty, 2007, Personal communication] Costs of the national eradication program in NZ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1140,WoS,14022,The economic impact of Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on California avocado production,Hoddle et al,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Thysanoptera,Thripidae,Scirtothrips,Scirtothrips perseae,,Avocado thrips,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,6925000,5200000,8650000,9227378.199,9227378.199,6925000,9227378.199,9227378.199,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Decline in welfare for growers with thrip infestation (short run (i.e., the time period during which the industry adapts to managing a new pest) vs long run (i.e., the time period after which the industry has fully adapted to the effects of a new pest)). As data were collected from various years, the publication year 2003 was used here. 
""8 650 000 (short run) - 5 200 000 (long run)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1141,WoS,14022,The economic impact of Scirtothrips perseae Nakahara (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on California avocado production,Hoddle et al,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Thysanoptera,Thripidae,Scirtothrips,Scirtothrips perseae,,Avocado thrips,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,6480000,4450000,8510000,8634427.542,8634427.542,6480000,8634427.542,8634427.542,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Annual net loss to the avocado industry (short run (i.e., the time period during which the industry adapts to managing a new pest) vs long run (i.e., the time period after which the industry has fully adapted to the effects of a new pest)). As data were collected from various years, the publication year 2003 was used here.
""8 510 000 (short run) - 4 450 000 (long run)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1142,TC,583,The new world screwworm eradication programme in North Africa. An international effort aims to stop the spread of the health-threatening pest,Vloedt et al,,1990,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Calliphoridae,Cochliomyia,Cochliomyia hominivorax,,New World Screwworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Southeastern USA/Southwestern USA,Site,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,187603482.4,187603482.4,100000000,187603482.4,187603482.4,USD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,No precise period and no reference provided,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1143,TC,583,The new world screwworm eradication programme in North Africa. An international effort aims to stop the spread of the health-threatening pest,Vloedt et al,,1990,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Calliphoridae,Cochliomyia,Cochliomyia hominivorax,,New World Screwworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa/Asia/Europe,Diverse/Unspecified,,North Africa/Africa South of the Sahel/Middle East/Southern Europe,Intercontinental,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,1000000000,,,1876034824,,1000000000,1876034824,,USD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"According to the FAO, so far no cases of New World Screwworm have been reported outside the previously known area of infestation in Libya. However, it is antici- pated that favourable climate and vegetation, and an abundance of hosts (livestock and wild animals) will assure that the parasite continues its spread throughout North Africa and in due course invades Africa south of the Sahel, the Middle East, and southern Europe.
Spread will be facilitated especially by uncontrolled movement of infested animals. Costs of control and losses to livestock owners will be extensive and may exceed US $1000 million per year.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1147,WoS,8142,"The ecology, geopolitics, and economics of managing Lymantria dispar in the United States",Tobin et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy Moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1890-1900,Period,1890,1900,1890,1900,One-time,30800000,,,32882766.57,32882766.57,2800000,2989342.415,2989342.415,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""The first eradication effort, from 1890 to 1900, initially targeted a population that covered 42500 km2 encompassing 30 cities and towns at a cost of US $1.2 000 000 (equivalent to approximately $28 000 000 in 2010; Forbush and Fernald 1896; Popham and Hall 1958; Dahlsten and Garcia 1989).""
Original books containing the economic estimations not found by Boris
1 200 000 $ period 1980-1990
28 000 000 (converted in 2010 US$)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1148,TC,230,Cost-Effectiveness of Biosecurity Response Options to Red Imported Fire Ants in South East Queensland,Hafi et al,,2014,English,Official report,"Wylie, F. R., & Janssen-May, S. (2016). Red Imported Fire Ant in Australia: What if we lose the war? Ecological Management & Restoration, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12238 (ID1562)",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2001-2012,Period,2001,2012,2001,2012,One-time,411000000,,,454330392.8,284909089,34250000,37860866.07,23742424.09,AUD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Between 2001 and 2012 the Commonwealth, state and territory governments collectively spent $411 million (real 2012 dollars) controlling the pest",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1153,TC,490,Red Imported Fire Ants : Feeding on Radiolabeled Citrus Trees,Smittle et al,,1988,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Wylie, F. R., & Janssen-May, S. (2016). Red Imported Fire Ant in Australia: What if we lose the war? Ecological Management & Restoration, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/emr.12238 (ID1562)",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),1-2 years,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1988,1988,Potentially ongoing,1382.06,,,1049.275003,,1382.06,1049.275003,,AUD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[W.A.Banks et al., Unknown, Unpublished data] 750 US$ 1988 = A$ 2016 Extrapolation based on US estimates applied to Australian economic sectors in consideration of the level of local production, sector size and population. Price per Ha of citrus <4years old. Only reference provided : W.A.B et al., unpublished data",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1154,WoS,7185,"Insect communities in soybeans of eastern South Dakota: The effects of vegetation management and pesticides on soybean aphids, bean leaf beetles, and their natural enemies",Lundgren et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Aphis,Aphis glycines,,Soybean aphid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2005-2007,Year,2005,2007,2005,2007,One-time,182.83,,,192.3754057,192.3754057,182.83,192.3754057,192.3754057,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"3 treatments : chemical intensive / cover crop / reduced chemical. 
2005 :    296.82 US$ / 213 US$ / 191.5 US$
2006 :    269.83 IS$ / 104.38 US$ / 182.83 US$
2007 :   188.04 US$ / 161.78 US$ / 179.64 US$",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1155,WoS,10452,"Optimization of pheromone dispenser density for managing the rice striped stem borer, Chilo suppressalis (Walker), by mating disruption",Alfaro et al,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Chilo,Chilo suppressalis,,Rice striped stem borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,66,,,104.7566831,75.53236151,66,104.7566831,75.53236151,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Ministry of Agriculture, 2009, Personal communication] In Spain, price of the standard mating disruption treatment (51 dispensers/ha) is 66 €/ha (24€/ha if nb of dispensers is reduced)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1158,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Austria,,Unspecified,Country,2001-2008,Period,2001,2008,2001,2008,One-time,464000,,,690806.0567,468036.9582,58000,86350.75708,58504.61978,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eradication costs. Ongoing. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1159,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,France,,Unspecified,Country,2003-2008,Period,2003,2008,2003,2008,One-time,550000,,,818843.3861,546708.3716,91666.66667,136473.8977,91118.06194,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Eradication costs (Ongoing, not finished yet). Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1160,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,2004-2008,Period,2004,2008,2004,2008,One-time,650000,,,967724.0018,685910.9271,130000,193544.8004,137182.1854,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eradication costs. Ongoing. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1161,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2003-2008,Period,2003,2008,2003,2008,One-time,235000000,,,256432443.5,216329378.8,39166666.67,42738740.59,36054896.47,CAD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eradication costs. Ongoing. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1162,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Illinois,Site,1998-2008,Period,1998,2008,1998,2008,One-time,6881000,,,7735039.258,7735039.258,625545.4545,703185.3871,703185.3871,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,totaly Eradicated. The values given for individual U.S. states represent only state expenditures. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1163,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,New Jersey,Site,2002-2008,Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,6392000,,,7185346.743,7185346.743,913142.8571,1026478.106,1026478.106,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eradication costs. Ongoing. The values given for individual U.S. states represent only state expenditures. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1164,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,New York,Site,1996-2008,Period,1996,2008,1996,2008,One-time,54114000,,,60830390.12,60830390.12,4162615.385,4679260.778,4679260.778,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eradication costs. Ongoing. The values given for individual U.S. states represent only state expenditures. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1165,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1996-2008,Period,1996,2008,1996,2008,One-time,373430000,,,419778478.4,419778478.4,28725384.62,32290652.19,32290652.19,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Eradication costs. Ongoing. From year of discovery through 2008. The values given for individual U.S. states represent only state expenditures. The value given for the U.S. total includes the state expenditures plus federal expenditures by three USDA agencies involved in Asian longhorned beetle (ALB) eradication, research, and restoration: Agricultural Research Service, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), and Forest Service. gU.S. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1166,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora chinensis,,Citrus longhorned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2008,Period,2000,2008,2000,2008,One-time,1500000,,,2233209.235,1648207.793,166666.6667,248134.3594,183134.1993,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,1166 (1246),no,Eradication costs. Ongoing. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1167,TC,405,Managing invasive populations of Asian longhorned beetle and citrus longhorned beetle: A worldwide perspective,Haack et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Barlow, L. A., Cecile, J., Bauch, C. T., & Anand, M. (2014). Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions. PLoS ONE, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090512",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora chinensis,,Citrus longhorned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Netherlands,,Unspecified,Country,2007-2008,Year,2007,2008,2008,2008,One-time,625000,,,930503.8479,621685.4409,625000,930503.8479,621685.4409,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eradication costs. Ongoing. Summary data supplied by federal agencies in each infested country.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1168,WoS,5624,Modelling interactions between forest pest invasions and human decisions regarding firewood transport restrictions,Barlow et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Buprestidae,Agrilus,Agrilus planipennis,,Emerald ash borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,April 2005-March 2010,Period,2005,2010,2005,2010,One-time,17600000,,,16475163.49,14811347.42,2933333.333,2745860.582,2468557.903,CAD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"[Ontario Parks, 2014, Personal communication] The Canadian government spent $17.6 million in response to the threat of the EAB in operations, program, science, and public affairs between April 2005 and March 2010 (personal communication, Ontario Parks). CAD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1170,TC,563,"The economic impact of the red imported fire ant on the homescape, landscape and the urbanscape of selected metroplexes of Texas: a part of the Texas fire ant initiative 1997–1999",Lard et al,,1999,English,Official report,"Vinson, S. B. (2013). Impact of the invasion of the imported fire ant. Insect Science, 20(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01572.x",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Austin/Dallas/Ft. Worth/Houston/San Antonio,Site,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,581424292,,,874301805.8,874301805.8,581424292,874301805.8,874301805.8,USD,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Aggregated costs. Data collected through questionnaires to households, schools, cities and golf courses + secondary data from population, agriculture and market census
",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1174,WoS,15699,Optimizing the Use of Barrier Zones to Slow the Spread of Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America,Sharov et al,,1998,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,"Unit (1,000 Km)",1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,10276000,8006000,12546000,15452270.36,15452270.36,10276000,15452270.36,15452270.36,USD,1998,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Value from STS Strategy implemented in 1992 vs. optimized STS Strategy: The actual STS strategy predictions are $12546/km of length annually, and for the optimized strategy, it is $8006/km of length annually. 
total lenght of the barrier zone is 1000 km.
Initial cost (average trapping costs in the STS project in 1994-1995) values are based on pers. comm. (Leonard D.).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1175,WoS,15645,Boll Weevil Eradication : Area-Wide Pest Management,Smith,,1998,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,Boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,About a century (Until 1998 = publication year),Period,1888,1998,1888,1998,One-time,16650000000,,,25037008716,25037008716,150000000,225558637.1,225558637.1,USD,1998,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost to cotton producers,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1176,WoS,15645,Boll Weevil Eradication : Area-Wide Pest Management,Smith,,1998,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,Boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,225000000,150000000,300000000,338337955.6,338337955.6,225000000,338337955.6,338337955.6,USD,1998,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,loss to cotton producers,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1177,WoS,15645,Boll Weevil Eradication : Area-Wide Pest Management,Smith,,1998,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,Boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,150372424.7,150372424.7,100000000,150372424.7,150372424.7,USD,1998,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control measures ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1179,WoS,15645,Boll Weevil Eradication : Area-Wide Pest Management,Smith,,1998,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,Boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,North Carolina,Unit (Ha),1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,6.8,,,10.22532488,10.22532488,6.8,10.22532488,10.22532488,USD,1998,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"growers must continue to pay for surveillance programs to detect infiltrating boll weevils. The price of this program is only $6.80/ha in North Carolina, but this cost continues until boll weevils are too remote to reap-pear.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1185,WoS,7427,Cooling off health security hot spots: getting on top of it down under,Murray et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Bactrocera,Bactrocera philippinensis,,Papaya Fruit Fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1993-2012,Period,1993,2012,1993,2012,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,110542674.7,69320946.23,5000000,5527133.733,3466047.312,AUD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"(Supplementary Materials) Papaya fruit fly is estimated to have cost Australia $100 000 000 (AUD) through increased production costs, direct losses and reduced access to international markets for many horticultural products. /!\ in supplementary materials
=> they don't explain more in the supplementary material, just give the number",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1186,WoS,7427,Cooling off health security hot spots: getting on top of it down under,Murray et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Bactrocera,Bactrocera philippinensis,,Papaya Fruit Fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,4 years,Period,2008,2012,2008,2012,One-time,35000000,,,38689936.13,24262331.18,8750000,9672484.032,6065582.795,AUD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"/!\ in supplementary materials => they don't explain more in the supplementary material, just give the number",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1195,TC,221,Comparison of eleven soil termiticides against the Formosan subterranean termite and eastern subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae),Su and Scheffrahn,,1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Buczkowski, G., & Bertelsmeier, C. (2017). Invasive termites in a changing climate: A global perspective. Ecology and Evolution, 7(3), 974–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2674 ",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii (Honolulu),Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,22500000,15000000,30000000,42210783.53,42210783.53,22500000,42210783.53,42210783.53,USD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Values based on not found references [Effects of an entomogeneous nematode, Neoaplectana carpocapsae Weiser, on the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki, with ecological and biological studies on C. formosanus (Fujii 1975); Biology and ecology of the Formosan subterranean teremite, Coptotermes formosanus, and its susceptibility to the entomogenous fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarrhizium anisopliae (Lai 1977); Flight, colony foundation, and development of the gonads of the primary reproductives of the Formosan subterranean termite, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Higa 1981)]",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1196,TC,221,Comparison of eleven soil termiticides against the Formosan subterranean termite and eastern subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae),Su and Scheffrahn,,1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Buczkowski, G., & Bertelsmeier, C. (2017). Invasive termites in a changing climate: A global perspective. Ecology and Evolution, 7(3), 974–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2674 ",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,1985,Year,1985,Unspecified,1985,1985,Potentially ongoing,55000000,50000000,60000000,103181915.3,103181915.3,55000000,103181915.3,103181915.3,USD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Tamashiro, 1966, Personal communication] ""Based on the amount of termiticides sold in Hawaii, M. Tamashiro (personal communication) estimated the control cost at ca. $50 000 000 in 1984 and ca. $60 000 000 in 1985""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1201,TC,257,Economic aspects of the imported fire ant in the United States,Lofgren and Adams,,1982,English,Book chapter,"Jemal, A., & Hugh-Jones, M. (1993). A review of the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren) and its impacts on plant, animal, and human health. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 17(1–2), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(93)90051-T",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Southern USA,Site,1979,Year,1979,Unspecified,1979,1979,Potentially ongoing,2840000,,,7213882.038,7213882.038,2840000,7213882.038,7213882.038,USD,1982,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Lofgren and Adams (1982) estimated that the annual medical cost of RIFA for the infested southern regions of the USA was approximately US$2.84 000 000,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1202,TC,257,Economic aspects of the imported fire ant in the United States,Lofgren and Adams,,1982,English,Book chapter,"Jemal, A., & Hugh-Jones, M. (1993). A review of the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta Buren) and its impacts on plant, animal, and human health. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 17(1–2), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(93)90051-T",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Southern USA,Site,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,125000000,,,317512413.6,317512413.6,125000000,317512413.6,317512413.6,USD,1982,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Damage to soybean production. Estimated from yield loss,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1206,TC,505,"Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, southern cattle tick, cattle tick. CFSPH, Ames, Iowa","Centre for Food Security and Public Health (CFSPH), Iowa State University (2007).",,2007,English,Official report,"Sanders, C. J., Mellor, P. S., & Wilson, a J. (2010). Invasive arthropods. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 29(2), 273–86. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20919582",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Ixodida,Ixodidae,Rhipicephalus,Rhipicephalus microplus,,Cattle tick,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,3000000000,,,3546591005,3546591005,3000000000,3546591005,3546591005,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Available at: www.cfsph.iastate.edu/Factsheets/pdfs/boophilus_microplus.pdf] Accumulated losses, direct and indirect, due to babesiosis in the United States before the eradication of R. microplus",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1207,TC,331,Financial consequences of the Dutch bluetongue serotype 8 epidemics of 2006 and 2007,Velthius et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Sanders, C. J., Mellor, P. S., & Wilson, a J. (2010). Invasive arthropods. Revue Scientifique et Technique (International Office of Epizootics), 29(2), 273–86. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20919583",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Ceratopogonidae,Culicoides,Culicoides imicola,,Culicoides biting midge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Netherlands,,Unspecified,Country,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,100950000,,,163340627,101252137.5,100950000,163340627,101252137.5,EUR,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"/!\ indirect cost, no mention of the midge in the original article 
Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) transmit several important veterinary diseases, including bluetongue virus (BTV). The economic damage caused by BTV is difficult to estimate as many of the costs are indirect, for example, as a result of trade restrictions. However, one recent study suggests that the cost of the recent emergence in northern Europe in 2006 and 2007 was around €200 000 000 to the Netherlands alone.
The net costs (costs minus benefits) of the BTV8 epidemic of 2006 (BT2006) was estimated at 32.4 million Euros. The net costs of the BTV8 epidemic of 2007 (BT2007) was valued at 164–175million Euros (median = 169,5 million), depending on the mortality and morbidity rates for cattle used.  Global median = 100,95",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1208,TC,260,Economic assessments of red imported fire ant on Texas’ urban and agricultural sectors,Lard et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Texas,Site,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,581424292,,,792319556.3,792319556.3,581424292,792319556.3,792319556.3,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Complete and precise details are provided in several tables (and categories) wihin the papers,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1209,TC,260,Economic assessments of red imported fire ant on Texas’ urban and agricultural sectors,Lard et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Texas,Site,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,90572032,,,123424482.3,123424482.3,90572032,123424482.3,123424482.3,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Health/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Complete and precise details are provided in several tables (and categories) wihin the papers,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1211,TC,470,Potential ecological impacts of red imported fire ants in eastern Australia,Moloney et al,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,"In Murray, K. A., Skerratt, L. F., Speare, R., Ritchie, S., Smout, F., Hedlefs, R., & Lee, J. (2012). Cooling off health security hot spots: getting on top of it down under. Environment international, 48, 56-64. (ID 7427)",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,2001-2006,Period,2001,2006,2001,2006,One-time,175000000,,,151229457.3,171973006.4,29166666.67,25204909.55,28662167.73,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"In this paper, the sum initially provided was AU$150 millions for 5 years. I report the sum from Murray et al. as these authors took into account the supplemental 6th year (+AU$ 25 millions) not initially intended. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1214,TC,585,The North African screwworm eradication programme,Cunningham et al,,1992,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Calliphoridae,Cochliomyia,Cochliomyia hominivorax,,New World Screwworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Texas,Site,1992,Year,1992,Unspecified,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,300000000,,,524070851.6,524070851.6,300000000,524070851.6,524070851.6,USD,1992,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Prior to its eradication in the United States, losses were estimated at US $300 million per year in Texas alone.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1215,TC,585,The North African screwworm eradication programme,Cunningham et al,,1992,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Calliphoridae,Cochliomyia,Cochliomyia hominivorax,,New World Screwworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Libya,,Unspecified,Country,2 years,Period,1990,1992,1990,1992,One-time,75000000,,,131017712.9,,37500000,65508856.46,,USD,1992,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,1146(1215)/1108/1144,no,Eradication campaign using the sterile insect technique. The costs for the two year programme were estimated at over US $100 million,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1216,WoS,305,The Moscamed Regional Programme: review of a success story of area-wide sterile insect technique application,Enkerlin et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Ceratitis,Ceratitis capitata,,Mediterranean fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Central America/North America,Belize/Guatemala/Mexico/USA,,Unspecified,Intercontinental,1975-2016,Period,1975,2016,1975,2016,One-time,1000000000,,,1000000000,,23809523.81,23809523.81,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of the Moscamed Regional Programme (Sterile Insect Technique),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1219,WoS,9017,Using Citizen Science Programs to Identify Host Resistance in Pest-Invaded Forests,Ingwell et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Adelgidae,Adelges,Adelges tsugae,,Hemlock woolly adelgid ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,North-Eastern USA,Unit (Material),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,300,,,326.9144991,326.9144991,300,326.9144991,326.9144991,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Cost of designing, printing and distributing a brochure to identify resistent trees and support reseach (participative research)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1220,TC,262,Economic Benefits to Papua New Guinea and Australia from the Biological Control of Banana Skipper (Erionotu thrar),Waterhouse et al,,1998,English,Official report,"Nordblom, T. L. (2003). Putting biological reality into economic assessments of biocontrol. Improving the Selection, Testing and Evaluation of Weed Biological Control Agents, Proceedings.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Hesperiidae,Erionota,Erionota thrax,,Banana skipper butterfly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia/Papua New Guinea,,Unspecified,Regional,1988-1990,Period,1988,1990,1988,1990,One-time,700620,,,665170.5761,,233540,221723.5254,,AUD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Present value of the cost of the ACIAR project was $700 621 between 1988 and 1990 (table 1),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1223,TC,632,"Yellow head disease caused by a newly discovered Mattesia sp. in populations of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta",Pereira et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Pereira, R. M. (2003). Areawide suppression of fire ant populations in pastures: project update. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology, 20(3), 123–130.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Unit (Ha),2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,6500000000,,,8857691684,8857691684,6500000000,8857691684,8857691684,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolation based on 1 200 000 000 in Texas (Lard et al. 2001). No calculation, no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1233,TC,283,Economics of biological control of cassava mealybug in Africa,Zeddies et al,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Phenacoccus,Phenacoccus manihoti,,Cassava mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Diverse/Unspecified,,27 African countries,Regional,1979-2013,Period,1979,2013,1979,2013,One-time,46900000,,,77558498.62,,1340000,2215957.104,,USD,1994,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"See details of calculations and scenarios in PDF (Norgaard’s (1988) calculation are evoqued, but seem obsolete compared to the present article by Zeddies et al)
9 372 000 000 to 13 970 000 000 according to scenario",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1237,TC,596,The statewide economic impact of red imported fire ants in Texas: A part of the Texas Fire Ant Initiative 1999-2001,Lard et al,,2001,English,Official report,"Sternberg, T., Perry, G., & Britton, C. (2006). Grass repellency to the red imported fire ant. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 59(3), 330–333. https://doi.org/10.2111/05-151R1.1",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Texas,Site,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,1204207194,,,1667026161,1667026161,1204207194,1667026161,1667026161,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Reported costs for various sectors. No calculation available. Data gathered from surveys between 1998 and 2000. We only found an executive summary of this paper.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1238,WoS,5425,Potential Impact of Halyomorpha halys (Hemiptera : Pentatomidae) on Grape Production in the Finger Lakes Region of New York ,Smith et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pentatomidae,Halyomorpha,Halyomorpha halys,,Brown marmorated stink bug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,New York (Finger Lakes region),Unit (Ha),2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,3250,1100,5400,3365.090586,3365.090586,3250,3365.090586,3365.090586,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Potential loss due to potential damages (yield loss measured throughout this study). Calculated on the basis of grape price surveys.
5400/ha (Chardonnay)
1100/ha (Concord grapes)
4200/ha (Nymphs over 2 weeks)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1239,TC,312,"Estimating the Economic Cost of One of the World’s Major Insect Pests, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): Just How Long Is a Piece of String?",Zalucki et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Plutellidae,Plutella,Plutella xylostella,,Diamondback moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Global,2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,1785000000,1270000000,2300000000,1905705790,,1785000000,1905705790,,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"1 270 000 000 - 2 300 000 000 =Lower and upper bound of management costs of diamond black moth in all crops, assuming diverse management strategies (integrated pest management/single insecticide application/weekly insecticide application). control costs estimated by 1. spatially modelling the abundance of P. xylostella with a CLIMEX model; 2. estimating the number of required insecticide applications according to different management strategies; 3. estimating the cost with the product (area of production) * (number of insecticide applications) * (cost per spray of pesticide), for each crop.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1241,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,Colautti et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Adelgidae,Adelges,Adelges piceae,,Balsam wooly adelgid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Continental,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,1251585000,1001268000,24692897000,1086817203,,1251585000,1086817203,,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). This estimation for A. piceae sums the costs for annual timber sales (fir), annual domestic exports (pine and fir), christmas trees (annual wholesale, annual exports).
Boris  : 1 006 888 000 - 2 617 909 000 CA$",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1243,TC,54,Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU,Kettunen et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Continental,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1340000,,,2126878.112,,1340000,2126878.112,,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,[Unknown] The reference is replaced by references on the Asian longhorned beetle in Kettunen et al. 2009,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1244,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,Colautti et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Buprestidae,Agrilus,Agrilus planipennis,,Emerald ash borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Essex County,Site,2003-2004,Year,2003,2004,2004,2004,One-time,8250000,7000000,9500000,8229143.303,8686018.238,8250000,8229143.303,8686018.238,CAD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Marchant, 2006, Personal communication] Control costs in Essex county : ?$3 million in 2003 and $11–16 million projected for 2004 Ken Marchant Pers. Comm. Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ontario",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1245,TC,54,Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU,Kettunen et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora chinensis,,Citrus longhorned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,300000,,,476166.7415,319896.9087,300000,476166.7415,319896.9087,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Tomaino, 2005, Personal communication] Other reference also cited : Maspero et al. 2005. Current situation of Anoplophora chinensis in Italy. Reference not found. The figure reported here is thus assumed to come solely from the personnal communication by Tomaino R.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1247,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,Colautti et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,428481000,343048000,891925000,372072629.3,474973338,428481000,372072629.3,474973338,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). This estimation for A. glabripennis sums the costs for annual timber sales (maple), annual domestic exports, and mape syrup and sugar products.
Boris : 292 780 000 - 761 228 000",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1252,TC,352,"History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci",Oliveira et al,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aleyrodidae,Bemisia,Bemisia tabaci,,Tobacco whitefly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Arizona/California/Texas/Florida,Site,1991-1992,Year,1991,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,350000000,200000000,500000000,484517248.7,484517248.7,350000000,484517248.7,484517248.7,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Birdsall, 1999, Personal communication] Personnal communication of estimated crop losses. 200,000,000 for 1991; 500,000,000 for 1992",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1253,TC,352,"History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci",Oliveira et al,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aleyrodidae,Bemisia,Bemisia tabaci,,Tobacco whitefly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,138433499.6,138433499.6,100000000,138433499.6,138433499.6,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Birdsall, 1999, Personal communication] Personnal communication of estimated crop losses",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1255,TC,352,"History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci",Oliveira et al,,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aleyrodidae,Bemisia,Bemisia tabaci,,Tobacco whitefly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,,,,North America,Mexico,,Mexicali Valley,Site,1991-1992,Year,1991,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,16500000,,,28823896.84,46626377.21,16500000,28823896.84,46626377.21,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Losses to melon and watermelon, sesame and cotton crops. No source given for this estimation.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1256,Go,41,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany,Reinhardt et al,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gracillariidae,Cameraria,Cameraria ohridella,,Chestnut leaf-miner moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,19200000,10020000,33800000,28874156.3,25270956.01,19200000,28874156.3,25270956.01,EUR,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,NE4594/1256,no,"Control measures + fertilisation costs of afflicted trees. ""Data from published survey results from 5 major urban centers"". /!\ Other details provided in the text",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1257,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,Colautti et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Ceutorhynchus,Ceutorhynchus obstrictus,,Seedpod weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,300000000,240000000,624000000,260505807.3,332551505,300000000,260505807.3,332551505,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1259,TC,442,Novel technologies for subterranean termite control,Su,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,11000000000,,,15658045393,15658045393,11000000000,15658045393,15658045393,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Estimation of the total annual cost based on : (1) an non sourced estimate of US$ 2.2 billion of control costs and (2) a personnal communication of the repair vs. control costs for New Orlean of 4:1 leading to a calculation of 2.2 + 4 * 2.2 = US $ 11 billion annually for the USA. The global estimation is estimated with the statement ""the termite control market in the United States is generally considered to account for 50% share of the worldwide market"", leading to the global US $ 22 billion estimate.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1262,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Dendroctonus,Dendroctonus micans,,Great spruce bark beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,forest,1\2,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,32000,,,55582.27187,51219.91963,32000,55582.27187,51219.91963,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation of biological control and yield loss
Biological control  £32000 + yield losses £130,840

",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1266,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Elatobium,Elatobium abietinum,,Green spruce aphid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,3569324,,,6199723.031,5718709.967,3569324,6199723.031,5718709.967,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Yield loss estimate for the forestry industry.,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1268,Go,41,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany,Reinhardt et al,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Ephestia,Ephestia kuehniella,,Flour moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,780000,,,1173012.6,1026632.588,780000,1173012.6,1026632.588,EUR,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"780000EUR predicted annual expense due to cereal losses caused by flour moths : Cereal losses caused by flour moths have not been previously quantified. In order to obtain a basis for calculations, we assume losses by flour moths to be equivalent to those caused by the lesser grain borer, or 1 percent of annual grain harvest (see Chapter 3.3.2, Reichmuth, 2002). This predicts an annual expense of € 780,000. Other details provided in the text",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1270,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,Colautti et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Muscidae,Haematobia,Haematobia irritans,,Horn fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,2550000000,2040000000,5304000000,2214299362,2826687792,2550000000,2214299362,2826687792,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). Haematobia irritans reduces the yields of two ressources (cattle and milk) which were summed up here to provide the total cost. However, there are probably overlaps between S. calcitrans and H. irritans, so the total costs of the two species cannot be summed.
",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1271,TC,339,Future Challenges and Opportunities for Agricultural R&D in the Semi-Arid Tropics,Ryan and Spencer,,2001,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Helicoverpa,Helicoverpa armigera,,Cotton bollworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Global,1992,Year,1992,Unspecified,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,317000000,,,438834193.8,,317000000,438834193.8,,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,"Cited refs (Shanower et al. 1999, Abate et al. 2000) not retrieved. ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics) contacted, no answer",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1273,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,Colautti et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,2401410000,1921128000,4994933000,2085270835,2661975032,2401410000,2085270835,2661975032,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). This estimation for L. Dispar sums the costs for annual timber sales (hardwoods) and annual domestic exports.
Data from Canadian Ministry official, reports",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1274,TC,508,Risk assessment in the face of a changing environment: Gypsy moth and climate change in Utah,Logan et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Utah,Site,Late 1980s-Early 1990s,Year,1985,1990,1985,1990,One-time,150000,,,177329.5503,177329.5503,150000,177329.5503,177329.5503,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation of the cost of annual detection and delimitation, and the cost of an inadequate monitoring program in Utah in the late 1980s and early 1990s. No source or reference is provided.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1275,WoS,8142,"The ecology, geopolitics, and economics of managing Lymantria dispar in the United States",Tobin et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Pennsylvania,Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,7700000,,,8220691.641,8220691.641,7700000,8220691.641,8220691.641,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs of a treatment program in Pennsylvania,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1276,WoS,8142,"The ecology, geopolitics, and economics of managing Lymantria dispar in the United States",Tobin et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Oregon/Washington,Site,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,2298000,,,2453396.025,2453396.025,2298000,2453396.025,2453396.025,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of monitoring traps
[ $498 000 in Oregon  + $1 800 000 Washington]",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1277,WoS,8142,"The ecology, geopolitics, and economics of managing Lymantria dispar in the United States",Tobin et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Oregon,Site,1981-2012,Period,1981,2012,1981,2012,One-time,9767000,,,10427466.92,10427466.92,305218.75,325858.3412,325858.3412,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of 26 eradication programs since 1981
""During this time, eradication blocks have ranged in size from 0.02 km2 (Clackamas County, 1991) to 910 km2 (Lane County, 1985), with a corresponding cost of $267,000 to $9.5million, respectively. """,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1279,TC,322,Fading Forests: North American Trees and the Threat of Exotic Pests,Campbell and Schlarbaum ,,1994,English,Official report,Pimentel et al 2005,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1993,Year,1993,Unspecified,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,10600000,,,17986276.9,17986276.9,10600000,17986276.9,17986276.9,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Amount spent by the Forest Service in gypsy moth suppression and eradication efforts in 1993,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1298,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Diverse/Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,300000000,,,753087689.4,753087689.4,600000000,753087689.4,753087689.4,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Health/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pimentel et al. cite an estimated damage to livestock, wildlife, and public health estimated to be $300 000 000/year in Texas, with no source. They add that $200 000 000 is invested in control per year, citing two documents that cannot be found (Vinson 1992 and TAES 1998)
He also makes an extrapolation to all the other ""southern states"" = 1 billion $ (400 000 000 control + 600 000 000 damage)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1299,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Diverse/Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,200000000,,,502058459.6,502058459.6,400000000,502058459.6,502058459.6,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pimentel et al. cite an estimated damage to livestock, wildlife, and public health estimated to be $300 000 000/year in Texas, with no source. They add that $200 000 000 is invested in control per year, citing two documents that cannot be found (Vinson 1992 and TAES 1998)
He also makes an extrapolation to all the other ""southern states"" = 1 billion $ (400 000 000 control + 600 000 000 damage)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1300,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,Colautti et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Anthomyiidae,Stomoxys,Stomoxys calcitrans,,Stable fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,3672000000,2040000000,5304000000,3188591081,4070430421,3672000000,3188591081,4070430421,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). Stomoxys calcitrans reduces the yields of two ressources (cattle and milk) which were summed up here to provide the total cost. However, there are probably overlaps between S. calcitrans and H. irritans, so the total costs of the two species cannot be summed.
Min (20% damage)= 2 040 000 000
Max (52%) =  5 304 000 000
Mid (25%) = 2 550 000 000",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1303,TC,54,Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU,Kettunen et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Notodontidae,Thaumetopoea,Thaumetopoea processionea,,Pine processary moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Diverse/Unspecified,,European Union,Country,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,25000,20000,30000,52323.52455,,25000,52323.52455,,GBP,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2003] Original article not found. 20 000 - 30 000 GBP",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1306,TC,397,Limits and Potentialities of Eradication as a Tool for Addressing Biological Invasions,Genovesi,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Hypera,Hypera postica,,Alfalfa weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1968-1983,Period,1968,1983,1968,1983,One-time,1600000000,,,1891515203,1891515203,100000000,118219700.2,118219700.2,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Biological control program against alfalfa weevil, 1968 - 1983. Reduced pesticide use and saves farmers more than 100M$ each year in insecticide and application costs",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1308,WoS,3132,"Potential economic costs of invasive structural pests: conehead termites, Nasutitermes corniger, in Florida",Alvarez,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Termitidae,Nasutitermes,Nasutitermes corniger,,Conehead termites,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,259826,,,269027.0851,269027.0851,259826,269027.0851,269027.0851,USD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The state of Florida currently funds an “invasive termite control program” with an annual cost of $259,826, which is inclusive of the effort to eradicate N. corniger.
No references, no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1312,TC,607,United States Department of Agriculture - Agriculture Research Service Research on Targeted Management of the Formosan Subterranean Termite Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae),Lax and Osbrink ,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Alvarez, S. (2016). Potential economic costs of invasive structural pests: conehead termites, Nasutitermes corniger, in Florida. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(12), 2145–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2015.1130689",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1000000000,,,1332473386,1332473386,1000000000,1332473386,1332473386,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss/Prevention,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""It is estimated to cost consumers over US $1 billion annually for preventative and remedial treatment and to repair damage caused by this insect"" 
No details, no references. Not reproducible.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1314,TC,521,Spotted wing drosophila: adding cost to fruit production,Werts and Green,,2014,English,Official report,"In Benito, N. P., Lopes-da-Silva, M., & dos Santos, R. S. S. (2016). Potential spread and economic impact of invasive Drosophila suzukii in Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira, 51(5), 571–578. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X20160005000018",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Lauxaniidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Oregon,Site,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,14000000,,,14730928.62,14730928.62,14000000,14730928.62,14730928.62,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Producers of small fruits have been the most affected in economic terms. Before D. suzukii invasion, small fruit growers from Oregon spent US$ 1 million on pest management, and, after the invasion, this aggregated cost increased to US$ 15 million in 2013 (Werts & Green, 2014)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1318,WoS,8414,"IPM program development for an invasive pest: Coordination, outreach and evaluation",Dreves,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Lauxaniidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Oregon,Site,6 months (2010),Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,225000,,,252926.0039,252926.0039,225000,252926.0039,252926.0039,USD,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"""the Oregon researchers were granted sufficient funds from the state’s emergency reserve monies ($US 225 000) to operate for 6 months in spring and summer of 2010.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1319,WoS,8414,"IPM program development for an invasive pest: Coordination, outreach and evaluation",Dreves,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Lauxaniidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Oregon,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,5800000,,,6519870.324,6519870.324,5800000,6519870.324,6519870.324,USD,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"While addressing these initial objectives, a $US 5.8 million multistate grant led by Oregon State University was submitted to the USDA-CSREES Specialty Crop Research Initiative (SCRI). The grant proposal was successful, and funds were awarded in support of the SWD?IPM program in September 2010",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1325,WoS,11917,"Widespread infestation of the exotic mealybug species, Phenacoccus solenopsis Tinsley (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), on cotton in India",Nagrare et al,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Phenacoccus,Phenacoccus solenopsis,,Mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,India/Pakistan,,Unspecified,Unit (acre),2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,312.5,250,375,357.0473615,,312.5,357.0473615,,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""the pest infestation has increased the cost of insecticide application by US$250–375 per acre in both India and Pakistan"". Annual application assumed. No details, no references",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1330,TC,376,Invasion of California by exotic pests,Metcalf,,1995,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Lara, J., Pickett, C., Ingels, C., Haviland, D. R., Grafton-Cardwell, E., Doll, D., … Hoddle, M. (2016). Biological control program is being developed for brown marmorated stink bug. California Agriculture, 70(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v070n01p15",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aleyrodidae,Bemisia,Bemisia tabaci,,Tobacco whitefly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,130000000,,,209114377.1,209114377.1,130000000,209114377.1,209114377.1,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""damages of about $130 million annually from silverleaf whitefly infestations of desert agriculture"" no reference no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1332,TC,376,Invasion of California by exotic pests,Metcalf,,1995,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Lara, J., Pickett, C., Ingels, C., Haviland, D. R., Grafton-Cardwell, E., Doll, D., … Hoddle, M. (2016). Biological control program is being developed for brown marmorated stink bug. California Agriculture, 70(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v070n01p15",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Apidae,Apis,Apis mellifera,,Africanized honeybee,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,1800000000,,,2895429837,2895429837,1800000000,2895429837,2895429837,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,""". The Africanized honeybee poses a public health problem and threatens to disrupt commercial honeybee pollination of 47 fruit, nut, vegetable, and forage seed crops valued at $1.8 billion annually"" no reference no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1335,TC,540,"SWD Impacts, 2013",Burrack,,2013,English,Web page,"In Little, C. M., Chapman, T. W., Moreau, D. L., & Hillier, N. K. (2017). Susceptibility of selected boreal fruits and berries to the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). Pest Management Science, 73(1), 160–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4366",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Lauxaniidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,27558238,,,28997031.21,28997031.21,27558238,28997031.21,28997031.21,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Material available on line at http://swd.ces.ncsu.edu/working-group-activities/swd-impacts-2013/. Estimate based on a survey. Webpage (government of North Carolina), presented like an academic papers. They give good details of the methodology and sources (surveys)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1337,WoS,9875,The effect of Africanized honey bees on honey production in the United States: An informational approach,Livanis and Moss,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Apidae,Apis,Apis mellifera,,Africanized honeybee,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,43500000,29000000,58000000,48899027.43,48899027.43,43500000,48899027.43,48899027.43,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Specifically to the beekeeping industry, the Economic Research Service of the United States Department of Agriculture estimates that the introduction of the Africanized Honey Bees may cause annual economic losses to the U.S. beekeeping industry from $29 million to $58 million"" No reference, no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1339,WoS,9875,The effect of Africanized honey bees on honey production in the United States: An informational approach,Livanis and Moss ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Apidae,Apis,Apis mellifera,,Africanized honeybee,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,2310880000,,,2731915408,2731915408,2310880000,2731915408,2731915408,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The article provides crop sales with and without AHB => 12,558,693,000 (without) - 10,247,813,000 (with) = 2310880000. ?Authors' calculations based on county level data from the Agricultural Census of 2007, but no details on calculations or initial data for these results. See Table 9",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1345,TC,435,Natural enemies of Russian wheat aphid identified in California,Bernal et al,,1993,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Skvarla, M. J., Halbert, S. E., Foottit, R. G., Jensen, A. S., Maw, E., & Miller, G. L. (2017). An Update to the Adventive Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) of America North of Mexico, with Notes on Intercepted Species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 119(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.119.1.90",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Diuraphis,Diuraphis noxia,,Russian wheat aphid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,16 Western states,Site,1986-1993,Period,1986,1993,1986,1993,Potentially ongoing,500000000,,,848409287.6,848409287.6,62500000,106051160.9,106051160.9,USD,1993,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Since its detection in Texas in 1986, Russian wheat aphid [Diuraphis noxia (Mordwilko)] has become a major pest of small grains in 16 western states and has caused losses cumulatively exceed- ing $500 million""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1346,TC,435,Natural enemies of Russian wheat aphid identified in California,Bernal et al,,1993,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Skvarla, M. J., Halbert, S. E., Foottit, R. G., Jensen, A. S., Maw, E., & Miller, G. L. (2017). An Update to the Adventive Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) of America North of Mexico, with Notes on Intercepted Species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 119(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.119.1.90",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Diuraphis,Diuraphis noxia,,Russian wheat aphid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,1988-1989,Year,1988,1989,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,8000000,,,13574548.6,13574548.6,8000000,13574548.6,13574548.6,USD,1993,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""First detected in California’s Imperial County in 1988, the aphid did an estimated $8 million of damage to the state’s cereal crops in the 1988-1989 growing season.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1347,TC,477,Profitability analysis of soybean aphid control treatments in three northcentral states. Michigan State University Department of Agriculture Economics,Song et al,,2006,English,Official report,"In Skvarla, M. J., Halbert, S. E., Foottit, R. G., Jensen, A. S., Maw, E., & Miller, G. L. (2017). An Update to the Adventive Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) of America North of Mexico, with Notes on Intercepted Species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 119(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.119.1.90",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Aphis,Aphis glycines,,Soybean aphid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,NorthCentral USA,Site,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,2400000000,,,3114552193,3114552193,2400000000,3114552193,3114552193,USD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"During 2003, over 42 million acres of soybean in the north-central United States were infested => estimates of state-level average yield loss range from 9 to 13 bushels (bu) per acre (Hunt, 2004, Myers and Wedberg, 2002, Rice, et al., 2004) => => total yield loss without treatment could exceed 350 million bushels => translated into money terms at a soybean price of $7/bu, the economic loss could be worth over $2.4 billion. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1348,TC,477,Profitability analysis of soybean aphid control treatments in three northcentral states. Michigan State University Department of Agriculture Economics,Song et al,,2006,English,Official report,"In Skvarla, M. J., Halbert, S. E., Foottit, R. G., Jensen, A. S., Maw, E., & Miller, G. L. (2017). An Update to the Adventive Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) of America North of Mexico, with Notes on Intercepted Species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 119(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.119.1.90",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Aphis,Aphis glycines,,Soybean aphid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Michigan,Unit (Acre),2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,10,8,12,12.9773008,12.9773008,10,12.9773008,12.9773008,USD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""In 2004, Michigan producers spent $8-12/acre for insecticide application."" This figure cannot be found further in the paper.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1349,TC,477,Profitability analysis of soybean aphid control treatments in three northcentral states. Michigan State University Department of Agriculture Economics,Song et al,,2006,English,Official report,"In Skvarla, M. J., Halbert, S. E., Foottit, R. G., Jensen, A. S., Maw, E., & Miller, G. L. (2017). An Update to the Adventive Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidoidea) of America North of Mexico, with Notes on Intercepted Species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 119(1), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.119.1.90",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Aphis,Aphis glycines,,Soybean aphid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Michigan/Iowa/Minnesota,Unit (Ha),2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,16.29,2,30.58,20.44633077,20.44633077,16.29,20.44633077,20.44633077,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Table 3 Costs that Vary by Treatment, RAMP Soybean Aphid protocol in Michigan, Iowa and Minnesota, 2005. Total cost of treating soybean aphid range across treatments) in Michigan, Iowa, Minnesota, 2005",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1357,WoS,4520,"Population dynamics and economic losses caused by Zeuzera pyrina, a cryptic wood-borer moth, in an olive orchard in Egypt",Hegazi et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Cossidae,Zeuzera,Zeuzera pyrina,,Leopard moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Egypt,,2 plots located between Alexandria and Cairo,Unit (Ha),2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1550,1400,1700,1602.987778,5085.958821,1550,1602.987778,5085.958821,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses in 2 local susceptible olive cultivars caused by Zeuzera pyrina in two plots estimated under natural infestation in 'low-fruiting year’ 2007. Multiplication of crop loss with the price of olive fruits per
weight ($W) gives the economic loss (LE) of ZP per area. However the source of the price of fruits per weight is not provided. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1358,WoS,4520,"Population dynamics and economic losses caused by Zeuzera pyrina, a cryptic wood-borer moth, in an olive orchard in Egypt",Hegazi et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Cossidae,Zeuzera,Zeuzera pyrina,,Leopard moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Egypt,,2 plots located between Alexandria and Cairo,Unit (Ha),2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,2350,1500,3200,2430.336309,7710.969825,2350,2430.336309,7710.969825,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses in 2 local susceptible olive cultivars caused by Zeuzera pyrina in two plots estimated under natural infestation in ‘high-fruiting year’ 2006. Multiplication of crop loss with the price of olive fruits per
weight ($W) gives the economic loss (LE) of ZP per area. However the source of the price of fruits per weight is not provided. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1359,WoS,370,"Monitoring of the invasive Halyomorpha halys, a new key pest of fruit orchards in northern Italy",Maistrello et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pentatomidae,Halyomorpha,Halyomorpha halys,,brown marmorated stink bug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Modena,Unit (400 Ha),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,3072797,,,3398979.647,3900855.783,3072797,3398979.647,3900855.783,EUR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Fruit Modena Group Technical Office, 2017, Personal communication] ""According to a conservative estimate performed in 2016 by the biggest regional association of fruit growers, on a sample of 60 representative pear orchard farms (400 Ha in total) in the province of Modena, the total damage due to H. halys was 3,072,797 euro (Fruit Modena Group Technical Office, personal communication).",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1361,TC,387,Is devastating whitefly invader really a new species?,Barinaga,,1993,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Wan, F., Zhang, G., Liu, S., Luo, C., Chu, D., Zhang, Y., … Zhang, Y. (2009). Invasive mechanism and management strategy of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) biotype B: Progress report of 973 Program on invasive alien species in China. Science in China, Series C: Life Sciences, 52(1), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-008-0135-4",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Buprestidae,Agrilus,Agrilus planipennis,,Emerald ash borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida/California/Texas,Site,1991-1992,Year,1991,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,175000000,100000000,250000000,296943250.6,296943250.6,175000000,296943250.6,296943250.6,USD,1993,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"cost reported by Wan was not in the ""original paper"" (Barrianga)
in wan : ""The crop losses caused by the pest were $200? 500 million in California, Florida and Texas during the years 1991 and 1992[""
in Barrianga, nothing more than ""In 1986 a new variety of whitefly, a common crop pest in Florida and the Southwest, came winging its way out of Florida's poinsettia
greenhouses; by 1991 it was tearing through California and Arizona, leaving millions of dollars of crop destruction in its wake."" 
--> maybe supplementary material ? (but impossible to find more information)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1363,GS,90,"Eradication of populations of an invasive ant in northern Australia: Successes, failures and lessons for management",Hoffmann ,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Pheidole,Pheidole megacephala,,Bigheaded ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,9 sites in Northern Australia,Site,2007-2010,Period,2007,2010,2007,2010,One-time,92666.66667,,,78120.74989,50120.83786,17375,19530.18747,12530.20947,AUD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Overall, the on-ground works of this project were completed with a government cash  contribution of AUD$36,500 plus an estimated $33K in-kind contribution from all  involved.""
2007 : treatment phase
2 years post-treatment",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1364,TC,463,Pink bollworm eradication plan in the U.S. United States Department of Agriculture,Grefenstette et al,,2009,English,Official report,"Gutierrez, A. P., & Ponti, L. (2013). Eradication of Invasive Species: Why the Biology Matters. Environmental Entomology, 42(3), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN12018",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Pectinophora,Pectinophora gossypiella,,"Pink
bollworm",Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California/Arizona,Site,Past 30 years (from 2013 = publication year),Period,1979,2009,1979,2009,One-time,1200000,,,1371061.868,1371061.868,40000,45702.06227,45702.06227,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Guttierez found in Scholar, quotes Grefenstettes, who is citing 2 sources in the same time, but both impossible to find. Official report (action plan for eradication) 
""Control costs for PBW in Southern California and Arizona were estimated to exceed $1.2 billion over the past thirty years (Roberson et al. 1998, Antilla et al. 1999)""

in Antilla et al. 1999, it would also say that ""yield loss ranges from $85-$170 per acre""

In Guttierez , they quoted a SIT cost of $300M, but no such cost in Grefenstettes 
""Pink Bollworm. The ongoing $300 million SIT eradication program against pink bollworm (see Grefenstette et al. 2009) ....""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1365,TC,464,Pink Bollworm Eradication: A Window of Opportunity,National Cotton Council,,2001,English,Official report,"Grefenstette, B., O. El-Lissy, and R. T. Staten. 2009. Pink bollworm eradication plan in the U.S. United States Department of Agriculture, (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ plant_health/plant_pest_info/cotton_pests/downloads/pbw-erad-plan2-09.pdf",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Pectinophora,Pectinophora gossypiella,,"Pink
bollworm",Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,21600000,,,29901635.92,29901635.92,21600000,29901635.92,29901635.92,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss/Prevention,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"?The National Cotton Council estimates pink bollworm costs Western cotton producers an estimated $21.6 million annually for prevention, control and yield losses.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1366,GS,89,Eradication of Invasive Species: Why the Biology Matters,Gutierrez and Ponti,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Ceratitis,Ceratitis capitata,,Mediterranean fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Central America/North America,Guatemala/Mexico/USA,,Guatemala/Mexico/California,Intercontinental,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,14000000,,,14730928.62,,14000000,14730928.62,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""An eradication/detection program is ongoing in California, and in Mexico and Guatemala (...) the total costs of the eradication program have been more than $450 million""
--> Details under the table : 14 million per year since 1980 + emergency spray program cost
References not provided",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1368,GS,89,Eradication of Invasive Species: Why the Biology Matters,Gutierrez and Ponti,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Cicadellidae,Homalodisca,Homalodisca vitripennis,,Glassy-winged sharpshooter,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Continental,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,One-time,5000000,,,5261045.937,,5000000,5261045.937,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"It was mentioned '<5000000' in the table it is classified as ""effective biological control"" (VS abandonned and VS Probable)
No references, no more details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1377,GS,149,"Invasive pests ('biological pollutants') and US forests: whose problem, who pays?",Wallner,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,European gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Pennsylvania,Site,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,9000000,,,24262592.8,24262592.8,9000000,24262592.8,24262592.8,USD,1981,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"in 1991 in Pennsylvania, 9million USD were spent on spray programs. No reference or details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1378,GS,149,"Invasive pests ('biological pollutants') and US forests: whose problem, who pays?",Wallner,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,European gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Pennsylvania,Site,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,72000000,,,194100742.4,194100742.4,72000000,194100742.4,194100742.4,USD,1981,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"in 1991 in Pennsylvania, timber losses exceeded 72million USD. No reference or details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1379,GS,149,"Invasive pests ('biological pollutants') and US forests: whose problem, who pays?",Wallner,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,European gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1980-1994,Year,1980,1994,1980,1994,One-time,30000000,,,48257163.95,48257163.95,30000000,48257163.95,48257163.95,USD,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Yearly costs (in 1995 USD) for eradication, suppression, and research programs on Lymantria dispar in the USA for 1980/1994. Includes 8 millions spent yearly on pheromone traps (based on pers. comm.)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1380,TC,391,Krcmar-Nozic et al,Mastro,,1996,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,European gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,8000000,,,12868577.05,12868577.05,8000000,12868577.05,12868577.05,USD,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Mastro, 1996, Personal communication] Based on the conservative estimate of 20USD per trap, and that 400 000 pheromone traps are deployed yearly in the USA",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1381,GS,149,"Invasive pests ('biological pollutants') and US forests: whose problem, who pays?",Wallner,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Asian gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Continental,1993,Year,1993,Unspecified,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,25000000,,,42420464.38,,25000000,42420464.38,,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"?Males captured in pheromone traps placed in and around ports in Seattle (Washington), Portland (Oregon), and Vancouver were determined to be of Asian origin based on mitochondria1 DNA sequencing (Bogdanowicz et al., 1993). This resulted in a 25 million USD eradication program in 1993. No reference, no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1382,GS,149,"Invasive pests ('biological pollutants') and US forests: whose problem, who pays?",Wallner,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Asian gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,North Carolina/South Carolina,Site,1994-1995,Year,1994,1995,1995,1995,One-time,4500000,,,7238574.593,7238574.593,4500000,7238574.593,7238574.593,USD,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"No reference, no details",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1399,TC,184,Analysis of a Successful Classical Biological Control Project: the Alfalfa Blotch Leafminer (Diptera: Agromyzidae) in the Northeastern United States,Drea and Hendrickson,,1986,English,Peer-reviewed article,"OTA. (1993). Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States. Ota-F-565, (September). Retrieved from https://www.anstaskforce.gov/Documents/OTA_Report_1993.pdf",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,Boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1983,Year,1983,Unspecified,1983,1983,Potentially ongoing,1100000,,,2707143.993,2707143.993,1100000,2707143.993,2707143.993,USD,1983,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Benefit in 1983 was $13 million; research cost was ca. $1.1 million. Reported costs, reported estimated benefits. Benefits = costs estimated in Hendrickson & Plummer 1983; these are described as benefits in OTA 1993, ie avoided costs thanks to control actions ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1438,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted apple moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2004,2004,One-time,100000000,,,86017511.15,86094108.91,100000000,86017511.15,86094108.91,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry , 2004, Personal communication] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1439,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1933-1952,Period,1933,1952,1933,1952,Potentially ongoing,4421052.632,,,5450466.337,5450466.337,210000,272523.3169,272523.3169,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Perry, 1955] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1440,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia pseudotsugata,,Douglas-fir tussock moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Pacific Northwest,Site,1983,Year,1983,Unspecified,1983,1983,Potentially ongoing,4340000,,,5632148.548,5632148.548,4340000,5632148.548,5632148.548,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Rose, 1983] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1441,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Orgyia,Orgyia pseudotsugata,,Douglas-fir tussock moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Pacific Northwest,Site,1983,Year,1983,Unspecified,1983,1983,Potentially ongoing,660000,,,856501.853,856501.853,660000,856501.853,856501.853,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Rose, 1983] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1442,TC,229,Cost-benefit analysis of biosecurity and forest health research,Turner et al,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,290500000,,,249880869.9,250103386.4,290500000,249880869.9,250103386.4,NZD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Forest Health Advisory Committee , 1997] In table 1, Turner et al 2004",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1443,GS,219,"Pesticide resistance, population dynamics and invasive species management",McKee,,2006,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aleyrodidae,Trialeurodes,Trialeurodes vaporariorum,,Greenhouse whitefly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,One-time,8900,,,10821.69877,10821.69877,8900,10821.69877,10821.69877,USD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Median cost : the median value between all scenario using pesticides. ($2,000 ; $3,100 ; $4,100 ; $5,200 ; $7,400 ; $8,200 ; $8,900 ; $9,500 ; $13,400 ; $16,000 ; $19,800 ; $23,200 ; $24,000). Simulated increase in per acre profits compared to untreated control. The minimum and maximum value comprises all strategies (minimum from Watsonville, max from Oxnard, 3 applications)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1455,GS,33,Assessment of research needs for the management of invasive species in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of the Wet Tropics.,Poon et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Brisbane/Ipswich ,Site,6 years (2001-2007),Period,2001,2007,2001,2007,One-time,175000000,,,125299109.9,182496634.1,29166666.67,20883184.99,30416105.68,AUD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"""In September 2001, the National Fire Ant Eradication Program (NFAEP) began in the Brisbane and Ipswich areas. It is a six year program with $175 million in funding from the federal government. It involves detecting and treating infestations of the red imported fire ant (S. invicta), minimising spread to new areas and monitoring and re-treating areas, if necessary""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1456,TC,595,"The State of Australia's Birds 2006. Invasive Species. Wingspan 16, supplement",Olsen et al,,2005,English,Official report,"Poon, E., Westcott, D. A., Burrows, D., & Webb, A. (2007). Assessment of research needs for the management of invasive species in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of the Wet Tropics.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,1380000,,,1322746.818,,1380000,1322746.818,,AUD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Biosecurity Australia, 2005, cited in Olsen et al. 2006] For example, in New Zealand an outbreak of fire ants was dealt with in the early stages of invasion and cost $1.38 m, whereas the delays in responding to the outbreaks of fire ants in Brisbane have resulted in an eradication program costing $175 m over six years. (Biosecurity Australia 2005, ). The reference was not found in Olsen et al., nor in Poon et al.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1457,TC,595,"The State of Australia's Birds 2006. Invasive Species. Wingspan 16, supplement",Olsen et al,,2005,English,Official report,"Poon, E., Westcott, D. A., Burrows, D., & Webb, A. (2007). Assessment of research needs for the management of invasive species in the terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems of the Wet Tropics.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Brisbane,Site,6 years,Period,1999,2005,1999,2005,One-time,175000000,,,167739632.8,158209116.4,29166666.67,27956605.46,26368186.07,AUD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Biosecurity Australia, 2005, cited in Olsen et al. 2006] For example, in New Zealand an outbreak of fire ants was dealt with in the early stages of invasion and cost $1.38 m, whereas the delays in responding to the outbreaks of fire ants in Brisbane have resulted in an eradication program costing $175 m over six years. (Biosecurity Australia 2005, ). The reference was not found in Olsen et al., nor in Poon et al.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1466,GS,302,Ecological and socioeconomic impacts of invasive alien species in island ecosystems,Reaser et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Anoplolepis,Anoplolepis gracilipes,,Yellow crazy ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,Oceania,Australia,,Christmas Island National Park,Unit (Park),2002-2003,Year,2002,2003,2003,2003,One-time,750000,,,648126.2454,737027.1701,750000,648126.2454,737027.1701,AUD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Jeffrey, 2003, Personal communication] ""The initial stages of a rapid response programme for the yellow crazy ant (Anoplolepis gracilipes) in Christmas Island National Park cost AUD$ 1.5 million over 2002–2003 (M. Jeffrey, Parks Australia, personal communication 2003).""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1468,GS,303,Economic Dimensions of Invasive Species,Evans,,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,New York/Illinois,New York/Illinois,Site,1996-2003,Period,1996,2003,1996,2003,Potentially ongoing,30000000,,,39974201.59,39974201.59,3750000,4996775.198,4996775.198,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""The states of Illinois and New York City and local governments have already invested more than $30 million to eradicate this pest and protect 6.7 million trees in the infested regions.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1470,GS,91,Eradication revisited: Dealing with exotic species,Myers et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Cydia,Cydia pomonella,,Codling moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,British Columbia,Unit (Ha),1975,Year,1975,Unspecified,1975,1975,Potentially ongoing,225,,,215.6595816,260.9061393,225,215.6595816,260.9061393,CAD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of an eradication program using SIR technique, initiated in British Columbia in the 1970s. No details or references. ""Over several years of the program moth densities were reduced, but at a cost of $225/ha/year compared with $95/ha/year for insecticide control"" CAD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1471,GS,91,Eradication revisited: Dealing with exotic species,Myers et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Cydia,Cydia pomonella,,Codling moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,British Columbia,Unit (Ha),1975,Year,1975,Unspecified,1975,1975,Potentially ongoing,95,,,91.05626778,110.1603699,95,91.05626778,110.1603699,CAD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of insecticide control. No details or references. ""Over several years of the program moth densities were reduced, but at a cost of $225/ha/year compared with $95/ha/year for insecticide control"" CAD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1474,TC,286,"Embargo on California produce would cause revenue, job loss",Siebert and Cooper,,1995,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Myers, J. H., Simberloff, D., Kuris, A. M., & Carey, J. R. (2000). Eradication revisited: Dealing with exotic species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15(8), 316–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01914-5",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Ceratitis,Ceratitis capitata,,Mediterranean fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,1980-1981,Period,1980,1981,1981,1981,One-time,100000000,,,113848925.7,113848925.7,100000000,113848925.7,113848925.7,USD,1982,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""A 1980-81 infestation was ultimately eliminated at great expense - reported to be over $100 million - to the state of California and the federal government""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1475,GS,91,Eradication revisited: Dealing with exotic species,Myers et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,Boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,142345867.2,142345867.2,100000000,142345867.2,142345867.2,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Report of eradication costs of boll weevil in the US. Research towards eradicating began in 1962 - still ongoing in 2000,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1476,GS,91,Eradication revisited: Dealing with exotic species,Myers et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Victoria/British Columbia,Site,Summer 1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,3000000,,,2971317.512,3707208.135,3000000,2971317.512,3707208.135,CAD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""The European (North American) form of gypsy moth has been increasing in density in recent years in the vicinity of Victoria, British Columbia, and in the summer of 1999 a $3 million aerial spraying program was carried out"" no reference. CAD assumed",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1512,GS,305,Impacts of Introduced Species in the United States,Simberloff,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Southern USA,Site,1996,Year,1996,1996,1996,1996,One-time,200000000,,,312552863.7,312552863.7,200000000,312552863.7,312552863.7,USD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Material available on line at http://www.gcrio.org/CONSEQUENCES/vol2no2/article2.html. Eradication cost, application of mirex.",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1513,GS,305,Impacts of Introduced Species in the United States,Simberloff,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,European gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,764000000,,,2059624544,2059624544,764000000,2059624544,2059624544,USD,1981,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Material available on line at http://www.gcrio.org/CONSEQUENCES/vol2no2/article2.html. In eastern forests, losses to European gypsy moths in 1981 were $764 million, while the Asian strain that has invaded the Pacific Northwest has already necessitated a $20 million eradication campaign. No reference !! could be double-count; no dates are specified",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1514,GS,305,Impacts of Introduced Species in the United States,Simberloff,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Asian Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1981,Year,1981,1981,1981,1981,One-time,20000000,,,31255286.37,31255286.37,20000000,31255286.37,31255286.37,USD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Material available on line at http://www.gcrio.org/CONSEQUENCES/vol2no2/article2.html. In eastern forests, losses to European gypsy moths in 1981 were $764 million, while the Asian strain that has invaded the Pacific Northwest has already necessitated a $20 million eradication campaign. No reference, it could be double-counted; no dates specified",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1515,GS,305,Impacts of Introduced Species in the United States,Simberloff,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aleyrodidae,Aleurocanthus,Aleurocanthus woglumi,,Asian citrus blackfly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,1934-1937,Period,1934,1937,1934,1937,One-time,200000,,,312552.8637,312552.8637,50000,78138.21592,78138.21592,USD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Material available on line at http://www.gcrio.org/CONSEQUENCES/vol2no2/article2.html. ""The insect was found in Key West in 1934 and never left this island during a $200,000, three-year campaign in which a mixture of paraffin oil, whale oil, soap, and water was widely sprayed. The last blackfly was seen three years later, in 1937.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1516,TC,383,Invasive Species in China,Li and Xie,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Ding, J., Mack, R. N., Lu, P., Ren, M., & Huang, H. (2008). China’s Booming Economy Is Sparking and Accelerating Biological Invasions. BioScience, 58(4), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1641/B580407",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Agromyzidae,Liriomyza,Liriomyza sativae,,Leaf miner,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,China,,China except Tibet,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,80000000,,,109017743.8,337126317,80000000,109017743.8,337126317,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"/!\  Report in Chinese + this species in not in the GISD. 
""It now occurs throughout China, except in Tibet terrestrial and aquatic habitats (Holm et al. 1977). This species
(Xizang), and causes annual economic losses amounting to occurs more widely than does water hyacinth in the TGD about US$80 million (Li and Xie 2002)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1521,TC,609,"USDA Budget Summary, Fiscal Year 2004",United States Department of Agriculture,,2003,English,Official report,"Perrault, A., Bennett, M., Burgiel, S., Delach, A., & Muffett, C. (2003). Invasive Species , Agriculture and Trade : Case Studies from the NAFTA Context. Second North American Symposium on Assessing the Environmental Effescts of Trade, (March), 55.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,Boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,77000000,,,104929578.4,104929578.4,77000000,104929578.4,104929578.4,USD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,U.S. taxpayer expenditures for boll weevil eradication totaled US$77 million in 2002 and are estimated to cost US$34 million in 2003 (USDA 2003),Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1530,TC,420,"Mexican Rice Borer, Eoreuma Loftini in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas: Its History and Control",Legaspi et al,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Costello, C., & McAusland, C. (2003). Protectionism, trade, and measures of damage from exotic species introductions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 964–975. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00500",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Eoreuma,Eoreuma loftini,,Mexican rice borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Site,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,15000000,10000000,20000000,22905993.67,22905993.67,15000000,22905993.67,22905993.67,USD,1997,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Mexican rice borer's damage on sugarcane industry : 10 - 20 million,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1534,TC,541,"Tackling biological invasions around the world: regional responses to the invasive alien species threat. Africa. Cape Town, South Africa",Barnard and Waage,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Ceratitis,Ceratitis capitata,,Mediterranean fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,South America,Argentina,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,12977300.8,37648002.72,10000000,12977300.8,37648002.72,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""in Argentina the Mediterranean fruit fly costs US$ 10 million dollars per year in control programs"" no reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1535,TC,541,"Tackling biological invasions around the world: regional responses to the invasive alien species threat. Africa. Cape Town, South Africa",Barnard and Waage,,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Ceratitis,Ceratitis capitata,,Mediterranean fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,South America,Argentina,,Unspecified,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,90000000,,,116795707.2,338832024.5,90000000,116795707.2,338832024.5,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""15- 20% of production in direct loss annually, equivalent to US$ 90 million dollars per year"". Does not include incalculable indirect economic and social impact with the reduced production and loss of export markets. no reference",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1538,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Benin/Guinea Conakry/Togo,,Unspecified,Regional,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,7500000,,,9119409.078,,7500000,9119409.078,,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Funding from the german government, for control of the larger grain borer in Togo, Benin and Conakry",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1541,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Diverse/Unspecified,,East and West Africa,Unit (Farmer),2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,15,,,18.23881816,,15,18.23881816,,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of chemical control ""taken from a range of reports in the literature. Detailed explanations and the references for these data are presented in Appendix 5"" => Appendix 5 not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1542,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Benin,,Unspecified,Unit (Farmer),2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,151,,,183.6041028,471.9768378,151,183.6041028,471.9768378,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"151$ for the cost of establishment of improved grain storage. ""taken from a range of reports in the literature. Detailed explanations and the references for these data are presented in Appendix 5"" => Appendix 5 not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1543,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Benin,,Unspecified,Unit (Farmer),2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,26,,,31.61395147,81.26753499,26,31.61395147,81.26753499,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of improved storage (151$ for the cost of establishment). ""taken from a range of reports in the literature. Detailed explanations and the references for these data are presented in Appendix 5"" => Appendix 5 not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1544,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Benin,,South-West Benin,Site,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,218000,,,265070.8239,681397.0242,218000,265070.8239,681397.0242,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of biological control (requires research and development). ""taken from a range of reports in the literature. Detailed explanations and the references for these data are presented in Appendix 5"" => Appendix 5 not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1545,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Togo,,Unspecified,Country,Over 6 years (Unspecified),Year,2001,2007,2001,2007,Potentially ongoing,11780,,,14323.55186,41656.48209,11780,14323.55186,41656.48209,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of biological control (recurrent rearing, releasing and monitoring). ""taken from a range of reports in the literature. Detailed explanations and the references for these data are presented in Appendix 5"" => Appendix 5 not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1546,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Benin,,Southwestern Benin,Country,Over 6 years (Unspecified),Year,2001,2007,2001,2007,Potentially ongoing,11780,,,14323.55186,41656.48209,11780,14323.55186,41656.48209,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of biological control (recurrent rearing, releasing and monitoring). ""taken from a range of reports in the literature. Detailed explanations and the references for these data are presented in Appendix 5"" => Appendix 5 not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1547,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Kenya,,Southeastern Kenya,Country,Over 6 years (Unspecified),Year,2001,2007,2001,2007,Potentially ongoing,11780,,,14323.55186,41656.48209,11780,14323.55186,41656.48209,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of biological control (recurrent rearing, releasing and monitoring). ""taken from a range of reports in the literature. Detailed explanations and the references for these data are presented in Appendix 5"" => Appendix 5 not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1548,GS,310,The economic impact and appropriate management of selected invasive alien species on the African continent. Final Report,Wise et al,,2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Dermestidae,Trogoderma,Trogoderma granarium,,Khapra beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,Tanzania,,Unspecified,Country,1986-1990,Period,1986,1990,1986,1990,One-time,59000,,,83984.06165,321535.4616,11800,16796.81233,64307.09232,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Based on Mallya, 1992, not found",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1551,WoS,12947,The impact of invasive invertebrate pests in pastoral agriculture: A review,Goldson et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Lymantriidae,Teia,Teia anartoides,,Painted Apple Moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Auckland,Site,3 years,Period,2002,2005,2002,2005,One-time,90000000,,,79536199.79,73591630.88,30000000,26512066.6,24530543.63,NZD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Sherwin, 2004, Personal communication] Cost of eradication of the Painted apple moth in Auckland
""Projected expenditure on this programme, which sought to protect New Zealand's forestry industry (worth $3.32 billion to the export economy in 2004; Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2005) was estimated to be between $50 and $100 million; the amount committed to the programme was $90 mil- lion over 3 years (M. Sherwin pers. comm. 2004)""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1552,TC,560,The economic cost of Argentine stem weevil in pastures in New Zealand,Prestidge et al,,1991,English,Conference proceedings,"Goldson, S. L., Rowarth, J. S., & Caradus, J. R. (2005). The impact of invasive invertebrate pests in pastoral agriculture: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 48(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2005.9513673",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Listronotus,Listronotus bonariensis,,Argentine Stem Weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1991,Year,1991,Unspecified,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,149500000,67000000,232000000,155217710.3,180284867.3,149500000,155217710.3,180284867.3,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total costs : $78-251 M
- damage to perennial ryegrasses (Lolium perenne) : $46-202 M
- ryegrass staggers : $21-30 M
-> Agriculture = $ 67 - 232 M
- facial exema (health) : 8 - 16M
- bloat (health) : 3M
--> Health = $ 11-19 M",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1553,TC,560,The economic cost of Argentine stem weevil in pastures in New Zealand,Prestidge et al,,1991,English,Conference proceedings,"Goldson, S. L., Rowarth, J. S., & Caradus, J. R. (2005). The impact of invasive invertebrate pests in pastoral agriculture: A review. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 48(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2005.9513673",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Listronotus,Listronotus bonariensis,,Argentine Stem Weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,1991,Year,1991,Unspecified,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,15000000,11000000,19000000,15573683.3,18088782.68,15000000,15573683.3,18088782.68,NZD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total costs : $78-251 M
- damage to perennial ryegrasses (Lolium perenne) : $46-202 M
- ryegrass staggers : $21-30 M
-> Agriculture = $ 67 - 232 M
- facial exema (health) : 8 - 16M
- bloat (health) : 3M
--> Health = $ 11-19 M",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1558,TC,480,Protecting Hawaii from Invasive Pests,Coordinating Group on Alien Pest Species,,2001,English,Official report,"IKUMA, E. K., SUGANO, D., & MARDFIN, J. K. (2002). Filling the Gaps in the Fight Against Invasive Species. Honolulu, Hawaii.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,150000000,,,207650249.4,207650249.4,150000000,207650249.4,207650249.4,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The Formosan ground termite causes nearly $150 million in treatment and damage repair costs annually, most of which is paid by homeowners.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1569,TC,368,"Interception and eradication of colorado beetle in England and Wales, 1958-1977",Bartlett,,1980,English,Peer-reviewed article,"HEIKKILÄ, J. (2006). ECONOMICS OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES: PRE-EMPTIVE VERSUS REACTIVE CONTROL. The University of Helsinki.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Leptinotarsa,Leptinotarsa decemlineata,,Colorado potato beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,England/Wales,,Country,1976-1977,Year,1976,1977,1977,1977,One-time,104737,,,738898.983,1014127.969,104737,738898.983,1014127.969,GBP,1977,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Costs for eradication of colony in Thanet + Costs for precautions at all Dutch rye sites + For inspection and single beetle reports + Additional cost of Plant health administration, technical and administrative policy, and emergency research and development",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1570,TC,368,"Interception and eradication of colorado beetle in England and Wales, 1958-1977",Bartlett,,1980,English,Peer-reviewed article,"HEIKKILÄ, J. (2006). ECONOMICS OF INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES: PRE-EMPTIVE VERSUS REACTIVE CONTROL. The University of Helsinki.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Leptinotarsa,Leptinotarsa decemlineata,,Colorado potato beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,England/Wales,,Country,1948,Year,1948,Unspecified,1948,1948,Potentially ongoing,350000,,,2469181.321,3388914.987,350000,2469181.321,3388914.987,GBP,1977,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"1948 eradication campaign, adjusted to 1977 values",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1572,GS,82,Economics of invasive alien species: pre-emptive versus reactive control,Heikkila ,,2006,English,Thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Leptinotarsa,Leptinotarsa decemlineata,,Colorado potato beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Finland,,Unspecified,Country,1998-2004,Period,1998,2004,1998,2004,One-time,1237172,,,1887124.097,1257317.989,176738.8571,269589.1568,179616.8556,EUR,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pre-emptive control : Actual costs incurred in maintaining the CPB protected zone in Finland in years 1998?2004 were obtained from KTTK (Plant Production Inspection Centre, the relevant authority). Displays the protection costs when the real-life (pre-emptive) protection costs have been used. The true protection cost is calculated by taking the true costs for the period 1999?2004 (table 8), and for year 1998 – for which data are lacking – the projected cost is added (table 12)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1578,TC,291,Environmental valuation and the Hawaiian economy,Kaiser et al,,1999,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,1984,Year,1984,Unspecified,1984,1984,Potentially ongoing,150000000,,,229059936.7,229059936.7,150000000,229059936.7,229059936.7,USD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""For Hawai’i, the most recent formal attempt to measure the costs directly was a 1984 paper which estimated that about $60 million is spent by consumers on control and repair. This estimate was derived by surveying the 80 pest control companies in Hawai‘i and estimating the costs based on chemicals sold, since the companies were not forthcoming with many details. This number was inflation adjusted to $100 million in 1990 and then inflation adjusted again to $150 million in 1997"" no reference associated",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1579,TC,291,Environmental valuation and the Hawaiian economy,Kaiser et al,,1999,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,30000000,,,45811987.33,45811987.33,30000000,45811987.33,45811987.33,USD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Dr. Ken Grace, 1997, Personnal communication] ""More informally, Dr. Ken Grace has spoken to Pest Control Distributors and based on marketing surveys, found that termite control costs are $30 million for 1997""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1580,TC,291,Environmental valuation and the Hawaiian economy,Kaiser et al,,1999,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,350000,,,515034.3939,515034.3939,350000,515034.3939,515034.3939,USD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"""Termite control research in Hawai‘i is conducted at the University of Hawai‘i and the current budget is $350,000 each year, primarily federal funds, with some private, and a little state. The 1999 budget will increase to $450,000.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1604,TC,471,Potential effect of the Asian longhorned beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on urban trees in the United States,Nowak et al,,2001,English,Official report,"Kettunen, M., Genovesi, P., Gollasch, S., Pagad, S., Starfinger, U., ten Brink, P., & Shine, C. (2009). Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU. Brussels, Belgium. ",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,1310000,,,1622785.34,,1310000,1622785.34,,EUR,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1605,GS,298,Assessment to support continued development of the EU Strategy to combat invasive alien species,Shine et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,France,,Unspecified,Country,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,410000,,,683752.5806,361343.3532,410000,683752.5806,361343.3532,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring ,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Menigaux, 2010, Personal communication] Costs of monitoring Aedes albopictus, /!\ double count with Shine et al. 2010 (260 000 -1.3 million EUR for monitoring)",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1618,TC,482,"Queensland Government Submission. Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and Arts References Committee. Invasive Species Inquiry",Queensland Government,,2003,English,Official report,"Agtrans Research, & Dawson, N. (2005). Review of Progress on Invasive Species.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Anoplolepis,Anoplolepis gracilipes,,Yellow crazy ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Queensland,Site,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,120000,,,103700.1993,117924.3472,120000,103700.1993,117924.3472,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"The first major infestation of crazy ants was detected in Queensland in Cairns in April 2001.  Three agencies; NR&M, EPA & DPI provided a cash budget of approximately $120,000 together with considerable in-kind coming from all the contributing parties. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1619,TC,482,"Queensland Government Submission. Senate Environment, Communications, Information Technology and Arts References Committee. Invasive Species Inquiry",Queensland Government,,2003,English,Official report,"Agtrans Research, & Dawson, N. (2005). Review of Progress on Invasive Species.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Queensland,Site,5 years (2001-2006),Period,2001,2006,2001,2006,One-time,123400000,,,106638371.6,121265537,24680000,21327674.32,24253107.41,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Budget allocated subsequently to ABARE 2001 study : ""The then Standing Committee on Agriculture and Resource Management (SCARM) endorsed this option and referred it to the Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ) for a decision on budget support for a $123.4m program over five years.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1622,Go,46,Economic Impacts of Invasive Species in the Pacific Northwest Economic Region,PNWER Invasive Species Working Group,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,Boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,Since 1890s (Until 2012 = publication year),Period,1890,Unspecified,1890,2012,Potentially ongoing,406504065,,,433992801.3,433992801.3,3304911.098,3528396.758,3528396.758,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,Costs to U.S. cotton industry since 1890s. No specifications on the type of cost. No reference,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1623,Go,46,Economic Impacts of Invasive Species in the Pacific Northwest Economic Region,PNWER Invasive Species Working Group,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Asian gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Western U.S. forests,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2012,2012,One-time,20000000,,,21352445.82,21352445.82,20000000,21352445.82,21352445.82,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs to Western U.S. forests. 20 million USD in eradication campaign,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1624,Go,46,Economic Impacts of Invasive Species in the Pacific Northwest Economic Region,PNWER Invasive Species Working Group,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moths,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Eastern U.S. forests,Site,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,764000000,,,815663430.4,815663430.4,764000000,815663430.4,815663430.4,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,Costs to Eastern U.S. forests in 1981. No specifications on the type of cost. No reference,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1625,TC,175,"An Economic Assessment of the Impact of Mango Pulp Weevil on the Agricultural Sector of Palawan, Philippines",McKinley et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Dhang, P. (2015). MANGO PULP WEEVIL (STERNOCHETUS FRIGIDUS): AN INVASIVE SPECIES WITH ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE IN THE PHILIPPINES. Outlooks on Pest Management, 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1564/v26",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Sternochetus,Sternochetus frigidus,,Mango Pulp Weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Asia,Philippines,,Palawan,Site,1990-2009,Period,1990,2009,1990,2009,Potentially ongoing,120820000,,,128990125.2,304717895.8,6041000,6449506.261,15235894.79,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Palawan's farmers losses ,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1626,TC,253,Ecological and Socio-Economic Impacts of Invasive Alien Species on Island Ecosystems: Report of an Experts Consultation,Meyerson and Reaser,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Anoplolepis,Anoplolepis gracilipes,,Yellow crazy ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Christmas Island,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,One-time,247000,,,213449.5768,242727.6147,247000,213449.5768,242727.6147,AUD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Dr. Dennis O’Dowd, 2003, Personnal communication] An aerial campaign of poisoned fishmeal granular bait (0.01% Fipronil) was used and dispersed at a cost of AUS$ 247,000.  Monitoring of efficacy, non-target effects, and evaluation of broader application are currently underway.  ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1627,TC,253,Ecological and Socio-Economic Impacts of Invasive Alien Species on Island Ecosystems: Report of an Experts Consultation,Meyerson and Reaser,,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Maconellicoccus,Maconellicoccus hirsutus,,Hibiscus Mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Central America,Grenada,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,18300000,,,24384262.97,37687157.39,18300000,24384262.97,37687157.39,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Moses Kairo, 2003, Personnal communication] ""Grenada lost $18.3 million due to the Hibiscus mealy bug."" Control costs exceeded one million dollars not reported because too much uncertainty",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1634,TC,605,Trapping Asian Longhorned Beetles,Schwartzberg,,2013,English,Official report,Yellow Wood Associates Inc. (2014). The Actual and Potential Economic Impact of Invasive Species on the Adirondack Park : A Preliminary Assessment.,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,1997-2006,Period,1997,2006,1997,2006,One-time,800000000,,,841767349.9,841767349.9,80000000,84176734.99,84176734.99,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Collectively, from 1997 to 2006, the U.S. Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and the states of New York, New Jersey and Illinois and local governments spent more than $800 million on Asian longhorn beetle eradication measures.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1636,Go,90,The Actual and Potential Economic Impact of Invasive Species on the Adirondack Park : A Preliminary Assessment,Yellow Wood Associates Inc,,2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Buprestidae,Agrilus,Agrilus planipennis,,Emerald ash borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,New York,Site,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,2070824.976,2070824.976,2000000,2070824.976,2070824.976,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"[Carlson, Eric, Empire State Forest Products Association, 2014, Personnal communication] ""According to Eric Carlson, Executive Director of the Empire State Forest Products Association, the forest industry in New York spends over $2 million annually to comply with regulatory requirements related to invasive species.""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1639,Go,90,The Actual and Potential Economic Impact of Invasive Species on the Adirondack Park : A Preliminary Assessment,Yellow Wood Associates Inc,,2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Buprestidae,Agrilus,Agrilus planipennis,,Emerald ash borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,Washington (Ulster county),Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,469280,,,485898.3724,485898.3724,469280,485898.3724,485898.3724,USD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Aaron Bennett, 2014, Personnal communication] Emerald ash borer may cause property damage from dead trees or branches falling in roadways and on buildings, cars and/or people. Estimates of the cost to Ulster County in New York from the emerald ash borer based on a recently completed windshield survey of ash trees. Total cost for ash removal was estimated at $936,360 or $2,200 per mile for ash management along county roads. ",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1642,Go,90,The Actual and Potential Economic Impact of Invasive Species on the Adirondack Park : A Preliminary Assessment,Yellow Wood Associates Inc,,2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Lauxaniidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila ,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,Y,North America,USA,,New York,Site,2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,2500000,2000000,3000000,2669055.728,2669055.728,2500000,2669055.728,2669055.728,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"[Dale Ila M. Riggs, President, New York State Berry Growers Association and owner of The Berry Patch in Stephentown, NY, 2014, Personnal communication] ""Dale Ila M. Riggs, President, New York State Berry Growers Association and owner of The Berry Patch in Stephentown, NY reports that the New York raspberry and blueberry industries lost $2–$3 million in value of an $8 million crop in 2012, with many growers losing 100% of their fall raspberry crop""",Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
1645,WoS,5156,Incentivizing the Public to Support Invasive Species Management : Eurasian Milfoil Reduces Lakefront Property Values,Olden and Tamayo,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Lake George (New York),Unit (Lake),1985-2010,Period,1985,2010,1985,2010,One-time,8580000,,,11877594.27,11877594.27,330000,456830.5488,456830.5488,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The authors cite a 2001 proceeding paper that gave the total spending of 5 million $ for 1985-2010.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1647,TC,309,Estimación de los costes de la invasión del mejillón cebra en la cuenca del Ebro (periodo 2005-2009),Durán et al,,2012,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro basin,Unit (Basin),2005-2009,Period,2005,2009,2005,2009,One-time,11641995,,,15969877.37,13919341.63,2328399,3193975.475,2783868.327,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,1647/NE232/NE233/NE237,no,"Reported costs from a survey of 1329 agents of different sectors in the Ebro basin. Response rate was 28.4%, and number of affected users was 103. Results indicated a total cost of 11 641 997€ over the 2005-2009 period, hence an annual cost of 2 328 399€.",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1653,TC,51,Prospects for extirpating small populations of the wetland invader Melaleuca quinquenervia from South Africa : a case study from the Western Cape region,van Wyk & Jacobs,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Melaleuca,Melaleuca quinquenervia,,Broad-leaved paperbark,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,Wolseley (Western Cape),Unit (0.28 Ha),2009-2014,Period,2009,2014,2009,2014,One-time,53196,,,55014.54054,126262.242,8866,9169.09009,21043.707,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"53200 US$ spent over a six years period. However, investments were higher in the first year and dropped in the last years.",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1655,TC,50,Progress of the 2010 Spartina eradication program,Washington State Department of Agriculture,,2011,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,Smooth cordgrass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Estuarie of Washingon state,Site,2010-2011,Year,2010,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1155000,,,1298353.487,1298353.487,1155000,1298353.487,1298353.487,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Report of budget alloted to the eradication of Spartina in western Washington state for a 2 years program (2.31 M $US for 2 years).,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1657,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Water fern,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,444771,,,791647.5285,715810.3335,444771,791647.5285,715810.3335,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1659,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Pseudorasbora,Pseudorasbora parva,,Topmouth gudgeon,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,223540,,,397878.6578,359763.2084,223540,397878.6578,359763.2084,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1661,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Australian swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,132440,,,235729.8445,213147.711,132440,235729.8445,213147.711,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1663,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,4198409,,,7472744.645,6756880.612,4198409,7472744.645,6756880.612,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK. For this species, I summed up the costs of boat washing, hull sealing and mechanical control: 4.198+0.551",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1665,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,11640579,,,20719056.76,18734240.17,11640579,20719056.76,18734240.17,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1667,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea nuttallii,,Nuttall's pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,4369711,,,7777644.931,7032572.466,4369711,7777644.931,7032572.466,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1669,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,375088,,,667618.8155,603663.1578,375088,667618.8155,603663.1578,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1671,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,Curly waterweed,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1173214,,,2088202.611,1888159.76,1173214,2088202.611,1888159.76,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1673,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,Water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,10263,,,18267.10506,16517.17727,10263,18267.10506,16517.17727,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1674,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Parrot's feather,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1131550,,,2014044.893,1821106.104,1131550,2014044.893,1821106.104,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1675,WoS,9015,Estimating the financial costs of freshwater invasive species in Great Britain: A standardized approach to invasive species costing,Oreska and Aldridge,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,American signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,2208922,,,3931658.408,3555018.636,2208922,3931658.408,3555018.636,GBP,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost estimate based on questionnaires to stakeholders in UK.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1677,WoS,11161,"Density-dependent effects of a new invasive false mussel, Mytilopsis trautwineana (Tryon 1866), on shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone 1931), aquaculture in Colombia",Aldridge et al,,2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Mytilopsis,Mytilopsis trautwineana,,Mytilopsis trautwineana,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,South America,Colombia,,130 km south of the city of Cartagena,Unit (700 Ha),2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,6830935.544,12737654.54,6000000,6830935.544,12737654.54,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"it is estimated by CSC managers that reduced production and greater management costs equates to a lost revenue of $US30,000 per cycle in a heavily fouled pond. Scaling this up to 2.6 cycles per year, and five severely fouled ponds, this provides an estimate of $US390,000 yr? 1, or $US9,000 ha? 1 yr? 1. If all 81 ponds were to suffer similar fouling the cost could reach $US6 million annually,",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1686,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,rivers/canals,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,1815000,,,3798687.882,2944826.144,1815000,3798687.882,2944826.144,GBP,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,EPPO (2010) Report of a Pest Risk Analysis for Hydrocotyle ranunculoides. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation Report Number 09-15161.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Nigel Taylor,Yes
1687,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,rivers/canals,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,England,England,Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,23468000,,,49117138.96,38076683.17,23468000,49117138.96,38076683.17,GBP,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost has been estimated in this paper quite precisely see Sup Ref 21.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Nigel Taylor,Yes
1705,TC,43,Benefit-Cost Analysis of Melaleuca Management in South Florida,Carter-finn et al,,2006,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Melaleuca,Melaleuca quinquenervia,,Broad-leaved paperbark,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,South Florida,Site,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,26175000,,,34877490.88,34877490.88,26175000,34877490.88,34877490.88,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"Costs were estimated by contacting land owners/producers/managers. Benefits were estimated as avoided costs on the productivity or recreational value of areas where Melaleuca was effectively managed. However, in the end the authors compare the costs to benefits, but they compare the total benefits ($23.26 M) to each subcategory of costs (park managers, $10.87 / agricultural managers $1.18M/households $13.21M). They never compare the ratio total benefits over total cost, and end the article stating that the ratio benefits over costs is higher than 1, whereas it is actually lower than 1 when all costs are compared to all benefits.",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1707,TC,419,MELALEUCA MANAGEMENT PLAN TEN YEARS OF SUCCESSFUL MELALEUCA MANAGEMENT IN FLORIDA 1988 - 1998,Laroche,,1999,English,Official report,"Serbesoff-king 2003 Melaleuca in Florida : A Literature Review on the Taxonomy , Distribution , Biology , Ecology , Economic Importance and Control Measures",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Melaleuca,Melaleuca quinquenervia,,Broad-leaved paperbark,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,Florida,South Florida,Site,1988-1998,Period,1988,1998,1988,1998,One-time,25000000,,,36788170.99,3344379.181,2272727.273,3344379.181,3344379.181,USD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"The number 25 000 000 US$ is provided in the executive summary, but not elsewhere in the report. This value is probably a rounded estimate of the multiple reported costs included in the report, which add up to more than 20 000 000 US$ (15 M US$ in eradication / management and 5 M US$ in facility building + numerous other small instances of costs). Although it is not clearly stated how the 25 M US$ value was obtained, it seems plausible based on all the numbers included in the report",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
1718,WoS,11523,Preventing the Spread of Invasive Species : Economic Benefits of Intervention Guided by Ecological Predictions,Keller et al,,2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Orconectes,Orconectes rusticus,,Rusty crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Vilas County,Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,1505000,,,1888994.954,1888994.954,1505000,1888994.954,1888994.954,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Estimated losses due to the lack of fishing in lakes invaded by the rusty crayfish. The cost value shows up in the discussion, not in the results. It is unclear as to how it is estimated. However, given the rest of the paper, it is highly likely that the estimation is based on a reproducible methodology; but the authors did not clearly explain how it was estimated. Appendices are no longer available online.",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1720,TC,54,Technical support to EU strategy on invasive alien species (IAS) - Assessment of the impacts of IAS in Europe and the EU,Kettunen et al,,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Teredinidae,Teredo,Teredo navalis,,Common shipworm,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,Germany/Unspecified,,Germany Baltic coast/Potential other countries ,Regional,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,8700000,,,11409693.14,,8700000,11409693.14,,EUR,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"I cannot access the second reference provided, However, I can access the DAISIE Factsheet which reports the economic cost figures for Germany 25-50M€/year, however, I cannot based on the Factsheet alone, see how the final figure used in ref Rudy 1 was reach 8.7M€/Y?",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1723,WoS,8591,The Asian clam Corbicula fluminea in the European freshwater-dependent industry: A latent threat or a friendly enemy?,Rosa et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian clam,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,Portugal,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,200000,,,297761.2313,272664.7945,200000,297761.2313,272664.7945,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Estimated loss as a percentage of operating costs in several industrial sectors (drinking water treatment plants, thermal power plants, irrigation systems). Values were derived from questionnaires sent to the industry. The final value of 200 000€ is not well explained (details on the calculation not provided)",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1725,WoS,7594,Effects of eutrophication and exotic crayfish on health status of two Spanish lakes: a joint application of ecological indicators,Marchi et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,Red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,Spain,Castilla y Leon,Lake Chozas,Unit (Lake),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,661460,,,755752.1527,756994.4825,661460,755752.1527,756994.4825,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"This work compares the loss in energy in the Lake before and after the invasion of a lake by Procambarus clarkii. To value the ecosystem service, they make the assumption that 1MJ costs $0.014. The total value of the lake before and after invasion was respectively $668 000 and $6 540, thus a loss of $661 460",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1730,WoS,7468,Valuing impacts of the invasive alga Didymosphenia geminata on recreational angling,Beville et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,Didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,Unspecified,Country,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,10050000,6040000,14060000,8042174.337,7675419.573,10050000,8042174.337,7675419.573,NZD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Non-market estimation of cost of Didymo on recreational anglers on the basis of a ""choice"" (survey) approach. The reported cost here is the naïve cost of Didymo, i.e. aggregated estimated cost without behavioural change.",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1731,TC,45,California's reaction to Caulerpa taxifolia: A model for invasive species rapid response,Anderson,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Caulerpaceae,Caulerpa,Caulerpa taxifolia,,Killer algae,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,California (Agua Hedionda Lagoon),Site,2000-2003,Period,2000,2003,2000,2003,One-time,4800000,,,6024701.515,6024701.515,1200000,1506175.379,1506175.379,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Estimated eradication costs based on numerous funding reports,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1733,WoS,3562,Understanding acceptable level of risk: Incorporating the economic cost of under-managing invasive species,Davidson et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Cephalaspidomorphi,Petromyzontiformes,Petromyzontidae,Petromyzon,Petromyzon marinus,,Sea lamprey,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2015,Year,2015,Unspecified,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,20000000,,,20683713.26,20683713.26,20000000,20683713.26,20683713.26,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The source for this value is a personal communication: Nicholas Johnson, USGS, personal communication",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1737,WoS,9314,The effect of an aquatic invasive species (Eurasian watermilfoil) on lakefront property values,Zhang and Boyle,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Rutland County Vermont,Unit (ha),2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,31369,988,61750,35262.38141,35262.38141,31369,35262.38141,35262.38141,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"This represents the cost of removal per ha and the county include 1619 ha of invaded lakes.. In the artivle the cost is given per acre but the overall surface of the Lakes is given in ha. Thus here we have provied the cost per ha. Also, in the paper there are a couple of cost. 1-  the cost of removal (actual) and the cost to property value (estimated).  ",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1743,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, Bailey, van Overdijk, Amundsen, MacIsaac",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena bugensis,,Quagga mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,Canada/USA,,Great Lakes,"Unit (230,000 cottages)",2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,52670000,,,45736136.32,,52670000,45736136.32,,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The data originate from a pers. Com whih cannot be checked.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1744,WoS,12815,Characterized and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, Bailey, van Overdijk, Amundsen, MacIsaac",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena bugensis,,Quagga mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,Canada/USA,,Great Lakes,Regional,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,732000,,,635634.171,,732000,635634.171,,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The data originate from a pers. Com whih cannot be checked.,Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1759,Go,12,California Aquatic Invasive Species Rapid Response Fund : An Economic Evaluation,"Cardno ENTRIX, Andy Cohen",,2011,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Anabantiformes,Channidae,Channa,Channa argus,,Northen snakehead,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Maryland,Unit (Several small ponds),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,110000,,,138066.0764,138066.0764,110000,138066.0764,138066.0764,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Source cited in Cardno ENTRIX, Andy Cohen 2011: ENSR International 2005. Not accessible",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1760,Go,12,California Aquatic Invasive Species Rapid Response Fund : An Economic Evaluation,"Cardno ENTRIX, Andy Cohen",,2011,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Hyrocharitaceae,Hydrocharitaceae,Hydrilla,Hydrilla verticillata,,Hydrilla,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,14500000,,,24603869.34,24603869.34,14500000,24603869.34,24603869.34,USD,1993,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"Source cited in Cardno ENTRIX, Andy Cohen 2011: OTA 1993 Not accessible",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1761,Go,12,California Aquatic Invasive Species Rapid Response Fund : An Economic Evaluation,"Cardno ENTRIX, Andy Cohen",,2011,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Hyrocharitaceae,Hydrocharitaceae,Hydrilla,Hydrilla verticillata,,Hydrilla,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,1980-2005,Period,1980,2005,1980,2005,One-time,180960000,,,227131247.1,227131247.1,6960000,8735817.197,8735817.197,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"Source cited in Cardno ENTRIX, Andy Cohen 2011: Washington Dept. Of Ecology Not accessible",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1762,Go,12,California Aquatic Invasive Species Rapid Response Fund : An Economic Evaluation,"Cardno ENTRIX, Andy Cohen",,2011,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Hyrocharitaceae,Hydrocharitaceae,Hydrilla,Hydrilla verticillata,,Hydrilla,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Indiana,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2011,2011,One-time,700000,,,762800.4979,762800.4979,700000,762800.4979,762800.4979,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"Source cited in Cardno ENTRIX, Andy Cohen 2011: Washington Dept. Of Ecology Not accessible",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1769,GS,35,Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems,Padilla & Williams,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Caulerpaceae,Caulerpa,Caulerpa taxifolia,,Killer algae,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,California,Site,2000-2002,Period,2000,2002,2000,2002,One-time,12300000,,,16761478.11,16761478.11,4100000,5587159.37,5587159.37,USD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Management (Unspecified),Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,yes,"Source cited B Posthumous, Southern California Caulerpa Action Team, pers comm in Padilla &Williams 2004",Boris Leroy/Rodolphe Elie Gozlan,Yes
1794,WoS,15006,Potential Environmental Impacts and Economic Damages of Eurasian Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in Western Nevada and Northeastern California,"Eiswerth, M. E., Donaldson, S. G., & Johnson, W. S.",,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,Washington,Site,Unspecified,Year,1993,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1423458.672,1423458.672,1000000,1423458.672,1423458.672,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“In Washington, private and government expenditures to control this weed appear to be approximately $1 million/yr”",Ivan Jaric/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
1795,WoS,15006,Potential Environmental Impacts and Economic Damages of Eurasian Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in Western Nevada and Northeastern California,"Eiswerth, M. E., Donaldson, S. G., & Johnson, W. S.",,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,California,"Vicinity of Tahoe Keys marina, Lake Tahoe",Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,150000,,,213518.8008,213518.8008,150000,213518.8008,213518.8008,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“To deal with this invasive weed in the vicinity of the Tahoe Keys marina, an association of property owners ... an association of property owners has purchased two mechanical harvesters that cost approximately $75,000 apiece”",Ivan Jaric,Yes
1796,WoS,15006,Potential Environmental Impacts and Economic Damages of Eurasian Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in Western Nevada and Northeastern California,"Eiswerth, M. E., Donaldson, S. G., & Johnson, W. S.",,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,"Vicinity of Tahoe Keys marina, Lake Tahoe",Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,112500,75000,150000,160139.1006,160139.1006,112500,160139.1006,160139.1006,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“To deal with this invasive weed in the vicinity of the Tahoe Keys marina, an association of property owners ... the association spent $75,000 in operating costs in 1998 to harvest Eurasian watermilfoil. (Operating costs have been higher than this in some previous years, up to $150,000 annually.)”",Ivan Jaric,Yes
1798,TC,507,Risk analysis of the non-native Fanwort (Cabomba caroliniana) in the Netherlands,"J. Matthews, R. Beringen, L.P.M. Lamers, B. Odé, R. Pot, G. van der Velde, J.L.C.H. van Valkenburg, L.N.H. Verbrugge & R.S.E.W. Leuven",,2013,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Cabombaceae,Cabomba,Cabomba caroliniana,,Carolina fanwort,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,Netherlands,,Loosdrecht,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,One-time,350000,,,488971.2885,347507.1022,350000,488971.2885,347507.1022,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,1701/1798,No,"“In the Netherlands at Loosdrecht, C. caroliniana completely clogged the canal so that boating, fishing and swimming became impossible. The cost of management action for this invaded site over a single year was 350,000 Euros.”",Ivan Jaric,Yes
1799,TC,234,Dairy production revenue losses in New Zealand due to giant buttercup (Ranunculus acris),"G. W. Bourdôt , D. J. Saville & D. Crone",,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Ranunculus,Ranunculus acris,,Giant buttercup,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1 year (2001-2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,156000000,,,120704925,239069915.2,156000000,120704925,239069915.2,NZD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,“National estimate of milk solids revenue loss due to giant buttercup in New Zealand dairy pastures of $156 million in the 2001-02 season”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1804,TC,166,Alien forest pests: context for the Canadian Forest Service’s Science Program,Canadian Forest Service,,1999,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora glabripennis,,Asian long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,,USA,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,2300000,,,3384511.731,3384511.731,2300000,3384511.731,3384511.731,USD,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,No,“The United States has allocated about $US2.3 million per year to the study of the Asian long-horned beetle pest.”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1814,WoS,13784,The clearing of invasive alien plants in South Africa: a preliminary assessment of costs and progress,"C. Marais, B.W. van Wilgen and D. Stevens",,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum mauritianum,,Bugweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1 year (2002-2003),Year,2002,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,7320000,,,1470562.908,17925930.16,7320000,1470562.908,17925930.16,ZAR,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,Raw costs = Costs of initial clearing + Costs of follow-up + Cost of herbicides,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1832,TC,377,Invasions in agriculture: assessing the cost of the golden apple snail in Asia,"Naylor, Rosamond",,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea canaliculata,,Golden apple snail,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Asia,Philippines,,Philippines,Country,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,36550000,27800000,45300000,68569072.8,248459908.8,36550000,68569072.8,248459908.8,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss/Damage-repair,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,NA,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1862,TC,178,An economic evaluation of control methods for diffuse and spotted knapweed in western Canada,"Harris, P., & Cranston, R.",,1979,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea diffusa,,Diffuse and spotted knapweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,Western Canada,Site,1972,Year,1972,Unspecified,1972,1972,Potentially ongoing,350000,,,1009123.968,1249462.476,350000,1009123.968,1249462.476,CAD,1979,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,“the annual loss for the area infested in 1972 was $350.000”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1865,TC,178,An economic evaluation of control methods for diffuse and spotted knapweed in western Canada,"Harris, P., & Cranston, R.",,1979,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea diffusa,,Diffuse and spotted knapweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,Canada,,British Columbia,Site,1976,Year,1976,1976,1976,1976,One-time,204000,,,588175.1129,728258.1289,204000,588175.1129,728258.1289,CAD,1979,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“Nearly $204 000 was spent in 1976 by various agencies in British Columbia for knapweed containment”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1882,TC,579,The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe,European Environment Agency,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,United Kingdom,Country,6 years (2005-2011),Period,2005,2011,2005,2011,One-time,3770000,,,5171488.022,3631485.417,628333.3333,861914.6704,605247.5694,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,SC1305/1882 ,No,“The ruddy duck has been the object of an ambitious eradication programme carried out in the United Kingdom from 2005 to 2011 and co-funded by the EU financial programme LIFE-Nature (total budget EUR 3.77 million).”,Ivan Jaric/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1883,TC,579,The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe,European Environment Agency,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Asia,China,,China,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,1000000000,,,1371747486,1912106816,1000000000,1371747486,1912106816,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Fishery/Health/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,“Costs in China were estimated to amount around EUR 1 billion per year”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1884,TC,579,The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe,European Environment Agency,,2012,English,Official report,"Cifuentes N, Hurtado A & Ruiz T 2007, entry 1777; also entry 1698. Both removed duplicates",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe,Portugal/Spain,,75km stretch of Guadiana River at the Portugese-Spanish border,Site,4 years (2005-2008),Period,2005,2008,2005,2008,One-time,11010000,,,15102939.82,11788974.01,3670000,6120419.441,3929658.004,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,1884 (1792/1793/1790/1791),No,“Management costs to remove 200 000 tonnes of the plant along 75 km in the Guadiana river at the Portuguese-Spanish border amounted to EUR 14 680 000 between 2005 and 2008.”,Ivan Jaric/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1885,TC,579,The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe,European Environment Agency,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Nyctereutes,Nyctereutes procyonoides,,Raccoon Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Diverse/Unspecified,,Nordic countries,Regional,4 years (2010-2013),Period,2010,2013,2010,2013,One-time,5300000,,,7269845.835,,1325000,1817461.459,,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“A EUR 5.3 million LIFE project, 'Management of the invasive Raccoon Dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) in the north-European countries', has been financed for the period 2010–2013 to prevent the raccoon dog from establishing in the Nordic countries, and - where it has already invaded (parts of Finland) - to keep the population reasonably confined and try to stop its further expansion into other countries.”",Ivan Jaric/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1886,TC,579,The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe,European Environment Agency,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Milan Province,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,2743494.972,2222520.125,2000000,2743494.972,2222520.125,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,SC1634 (1886),No,"“In Italy, the costs of human ragweed allergy have been calculated to amount to almost EUR 2 million per year in the Milan province only.”",Ivan Jaric,Yes
1887,TC,579,The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe,European Environment Agency,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,13500000,6000000,21000000,18518591.06,14249000.4,13500000,18518591.06,14249000.4,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Damage-Loss/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,“Economic costs of eradication and medical treatments were estimated for Germany to be in the range of EUR 6 to 21 million per year.”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1891,TC,579,The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe,European Environment Agency,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Europe,United Kingdom,,United Kingdom,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,175000000,,,240055810,168570278,175000000,240055810,168570278,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“In the United Kindgom, more than EUR 175 million is spent annually to control Japanese knotweed.”",Ivan Jaric,Yes
1905,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Rooikrans,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,53857142.86,,,7993050.698,16189052.39,4142857.143,570932.1927,1156360.885,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric/Ana Novoa/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
1906,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia dealbata,,Silver wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,73635714.29,,,10928429.66,22134342.32,5664285.714,780602.1186,1581024.451,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1907,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,521764285.7,,,77436123.91,156838423.1,40135714.29,5531151.708,11202744.5,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1908,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,Blackwood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,26000000,,,3858714.13,7815404.602,2000000,275622.4378,558243.1859,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1909,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia saligna,,Port Jackson Willow,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,82085714.29,,,12182511.75,24674348.82,6314285.714,870179.4109,1762453.487,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1910,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,7614285.714,,,1130051.995,2288797.062,585714.2857,80717.99965,163485.5044,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1911,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Caesalpinia,Caesalpinia decapetala,,Mauritius thorn,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,30828571.43,,,4575332.468,9266836.885,2371428.571,326809.462,661916.9204,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1912,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cereus,Cereus jamacaru,,Queen of the night,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,53392857.14,,,7924145.088,16049491.59,4107142.857,566010.3634,1146392.257,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1913,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,159528571.4,,,23675967.41,47953089.67,12271428.57,1691140.529,3425220.69,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1915,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Proteales,Proteaceae,Hakea,Hakea sericea,,Silky hakea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,64350000,,,9550317.471,19343126.39,4950000,682165.5337,1381651.885,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1916,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,167700000,,,24888706.14,50409359.68,12900000,1777764.724,3600668.549,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1917,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,Syringa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,38535714.29,,,5719165.585,11583546.11,2964285.714,408511.8275,827396.1505,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1922,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Salicaceae,Salix,Salix babylonica,,Weeping willow,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,7521428.571,,,1116270.873,2260884.903,578571.4286,79733.63381,161491.7788,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
1923,WoS,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C., Wannenburgh, A., Kotzé, J. D., van den Berg, E., & Henderson, L.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum mauritianum,,Bugweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2008,Potentially ongoing,112821428.6,,,16744063.1,33913273.54,8678571.429,1196004.507,2422376.682,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,“cost of control by Working for Water between 1995 and 2008 for each taxon. Clearing costs are expressed as 2008 equivalent rands (1 US$ = approximately 7 South African rands).”,Ivan Jaric,Yes
2056,Go,91,The Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species on inland water ecosytems,"Ciruna, K.A., Meyerson, L.A. & Gutierrez, A.",,2004,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Italy,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,278000,,,360768.9623,423119.9127,278000,360768.9623,423119.9127,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,"“The Coypu, an aquatic rodent, causes damages to agriculture and river banks in Italy estimated at $2.8 million per year”; full reference: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (2005). The Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species on inland water ecossytems. Tenth meeting, Bangkok, 7-11 February 2005, Item 5.1. of the provisional agenda, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/10/INF/4, 6 January 2005.",Ivan Jaric/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
2057,Go,91,The Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species on inland water ecosytems,"Ciruna, K.A., Meyerson, L.A. & Gutierrez, A.",,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Europe/North America,USA/Unspecified,,NA,Intercontinental,13 years (1988-2000),Period,1988,2000,1988,2000,Potentially ongoing,875000000,,,1098252880,,67307692.31,84480990.79,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,"“The cumulative costs of damages to industrial plants caused by the Zebra mussel in the U.S.A. and Europe, between 1988 and 2000, were estimated at $0.75-1 billion”; full reference: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (2005). The Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species on inland water ecossytems. Tenth meeting, Bangkok, 7-11 February 2005, Item 5.1. of the provisional agenda, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/10/INF/4, 6 January 2005.",Ivan Jaric/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
2058,Go,91,The Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species on inland water ecosytems,"Ciruna, K.A., Meyerson, L.A. & Gutierrez, A.",,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Africa,Diverse/Unspecified,,7 African countries (Unspecified),Regional,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,35000000,20000000,50000000,43930115.21,,35000000,43930115.21,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,"“The annual costs of water hyacinth in 7 African countries between $20 to 50 million”; full reference: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (2005). The Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species on inland water ecossytems. Tenth meeting, Bangkok, 7-11 February 2005, Item 5.1. of the provisional agenda, UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/10/INF/4, 6 January 2005.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2061,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Cabombaceae,Cabomba,Cabomba caroliniana,,Cabomba,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,118200,,,108226.477,136045.9397,118200,108226.477,136045.9397,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2062,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Cabombaceae,Cabomba,Cabomba caroliniana,,Cabomba,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,243540,,,222990.4925,280309.8829,243540,222990.4925,280309.8829,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2063,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Cabombaceae,Cabomba,Cabomba caroliniana,,Cabomba,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,202570,,,185477.4742,233154.1964,202570,185477.4742,233154.1964,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2064,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Cabombaceae,Cabomba,Cabomba caroliniana,,Cabomba,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,49270,,,45112.67787,56708.82784,49270,45112.67787,56708.82784,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2073,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1997/1998),Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,711740,,,651684.5412,819199.1298,711740,651684.5412,819199.1298,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2074,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1998/1999),Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,817510,,,748529.8413,940938.3772,817510,748529.8413,940938.3772,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2075,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1999/2000),Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,859360,,,786848.6067,989106.9269,859360,786848.6067,989106.9269,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2076,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2000/2001),Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,899780,,,823858.0331,1035629.574,899780,823858.0331,1035629.574,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2077,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,799620,,,732149.3703,920347.3293,799620,732149.3703,920347.3293,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2078,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,863810,,,790923.1229,994228.7918,863810,790923.1229,994228.7918,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2079,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,493110,,,451502.1835,567560.1805,493110,451502.1835,567560.1805,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2080,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,325180,,,297741.8427,374275.9618,325180,297741.8427,374275.9618,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2081,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,Parkinsonia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,433870,,,397260.758,499376.0733,433870,397260.758,499376.0733,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2082,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,Parkinsonia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,1023970,,,937569.0837,1178569.889,1023970,937569.0837,1178569.889,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2083,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,Parkinsonia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,277390,,,253984.2848,319270.5856,277390,253984.2848,319270.5856,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2084,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,Parkinsonia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,291600,,,266995.2682,335626.0239,291600,266995.2682,335626.0239,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2085,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1997/1998),Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,14640,,,13404.70071,16850.36005,14640,13404.70071,16850.36005,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2086,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1998/1999),Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,31220,,,28585.70739,35933.623,31220,28585.70739,35933.623,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2087,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1999/2000),Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,64700,,,59240.71966,74468.46278,64700,59240.71966,74468.46278,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2088,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2000/2001),Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,48140,,,44078.02542,55408.21945,48140,44078.02542,55408.21945,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2089,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,495150,,,453370.0517,569908.1815,495150,453370.0517,569908.1815,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2090,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,905470,,,829067.9202,1042178.655,905470,829067.9202,1042178.655,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2091,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,266760,,,244251.2269,307035.6589,266760,244251.2269,307035.6589,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2092,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,111930,,,102485.5294,128829.2896,111930,102485.5294,128829.2896,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2093,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,Prickly acacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1997/1998),Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,514700,,,471270.4546,592409.8577,514700,471270.4546,592409.8577,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2094,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,Prickly acacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1998/1999),Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,6500,,,5951.540615,7481.375704,6500,5951.540615,7481.375704,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2095,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,Prickly acacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1999/2000),Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,6500,,,5951.540615,7481.375704,6500,5951.540615,7481.375704,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2096,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,Prickly acacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,319970,,,292971.454,368279.3514,319970,292971.454,368279.3514,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2097,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,Prickly acacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,584700,,,535363.9689,672978.5191,584700,535363.9689,672978.5191,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2098,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,Prickly acacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,225420,,,206399.4285,259454.1094,225420,206399.4285,259454.1094,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2099,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,Prickly acacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,90000,,,82405.94698,103588.279,90000,82405.94698,103588.279,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2100,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,Parkinsonia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1998/1999),Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,4690,,,4294.265459,5398.100316,4690,4294.265459,5398.100316,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2101,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,Rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1997/1998),Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,540980,,,495332.9911,622657.6351,540980,495332.9911,622657.6351,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2102,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,Rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1998/1999),Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,7450,,,6821.381167,8574.807538,7450,6821.381167,8574.807538,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2103,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,Rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2000/2001),Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,43000,,,39371.73023,49492.17773,43000,39371.73023,49492.17773,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2104,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,Rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,300640,,,275272.4878,346030.891,300640,275272.4878,346030.891,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2105,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,Rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,546610,,,500487.9409,629137.6575,546610,500487.9409,629137.6575,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2106,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,Rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,74070,,,67820.09437,85253.1536,74070,67820.09437,85253.1536,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2107,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,Rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,105000,,,96140.27148,120852.9921,105000,96140.27148,120852.9921,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2113,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Tamarisk (Athel pine),Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1997/1998),Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,94230,,,86279.02649,108456.9281,94230,86279.02649,108456.9281,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2114,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Tamarisk (Athel pine),Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1998/1999),Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,139930,,,128122.9351,161056.7542,139930,128122.9351,161056.7542,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2115,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Tamarisk (Athel pine),Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1999/2000),Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,136840,,,125293.6643,157500.2233,136840,125293.6643,157500.2233,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2116,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Tamarisk (Athel pine),Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2000/2001),Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,70000,,,64093.51432,80568.66143,70000,64093.51432,80568.66143,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2117,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Tamarisk (Athel pine),Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,282450,,,258617.3303,325094.5489,282450,258617.3303,325094.5489,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2118,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Tamarisk (Athel pine),Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,42570,,,38978.01292,48997.25596,42570,38978.01292,48997.25596,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2119,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Tamarisk (Athel pine),Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,23140,,,21187.48459,26633.69751,23140,21187.48459,26633.69751,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2120,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Tamarisk (Athel pine),Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,32460,,,29721.07821,37360.83929,32460,29721.07821,37360.83929,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands - Most or all funding allocated to the rangelands”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2121,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Amaranthaceae,Alternanthera,Alternanthera philoxeroides,,Alligator weed,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2000/2001),Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,136900,,,125348.6016,157569.2821,136900,125348.6016,157569.2821,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2122,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Amaranthaceae,Alternanthera,Alternanthera philoxeroides,,Alligator weed,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,40700,,,37265.80047,46844.92172,40700,37265.80047,46844.92172,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2123,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Amaranthaceae,Alternanthera,Alternanthera philoxeroides,,Alligator weed,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,191600,,,175433.1049,220527.9361,191600,175433.1049,220527.9361,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2124,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Amaranthaceae,Alternanthera,Alternanthera philoxeroides,,Alligator weed,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,59750,,,54708.39258,68771.10743,59750,54708.39258,68771.10743,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2125,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Amaranthaceae,Alternanthera,Alternanthera philoxeroides,,Alligator weed,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,311890,,,285573.2312,358979.4259,311890,285573.2312,358979.4259,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2126,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella neesiana,,Chilean needle grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1997/1998),Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,2560,,,2343.991381,2946.511047,2560,2343.991381,2946.511047,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2127,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella neesiana,,Chilean needle grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1998/1999),Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,2860,,,2618.677871,3291.80531,2860,2618.677871,3291.80531,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2128,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella neesiana,,Chilean needle grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,342950,,,314012.4391,394728.892,342950,314012.4391,394728.892,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2129,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella neesiana,,Chilean needle grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,1066240,,,976272.4101,1227221.851,1066240,976272.4101,1227221.851,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2130,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella neesiana,,Chilean needle grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,194140,,,177758.7839,223451.4276,194140,177758.7839,223451.4276,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2131,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella neesiana,,Chilean needle grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,352000,,,322298.8149,405145.2689,352000,322298.8149,405145.2689,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2132,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1997/1998),Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,92880,,,85042.93729,106903.1039,92880,85042.93729,106903.1039,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2133,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1998/1999),Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,86610,,,79301.98965,99686.4538,86610,79301.98965,99686.4538,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2134,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (1999/2000),Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,76100,,,69678.80628,87589.64478,76100,69678.80628,87589.64478,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2135,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2000/2001),Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,84300,,,77186.90367,97027.68798,84300,77186.90367,97027.68798,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2136,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2001/2002),Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,231820,,,212259.407,266820.387,231820,212259.407,266820.387,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2137,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,967070,,,885470.2128,1113079.077,967070,885470.2128,1113079.077,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2138,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,272750,,,249735.8004,313930.0344,272750,249735.8004,313930.0344,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2139,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,635450,,,581831.7668,731390.7986,635450,581831.7668,731390.7986,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2140,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella trichotoma,,Serrated tussock,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2002/2003),Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,78500,,,71876.2982,90351.99889,78500,71876.2982,90351.99889,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2141,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella trichotoma,,Serrated tussock,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2003/2004),Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,291000,,,266445.8952,334935.4354,291000,266445.8952,334935.4354,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2142,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella trichotoma,,Serrated tussock,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,1 year (2004/2005),Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,278790,,,255266.1551,320881.9589,278790,255266.1551,320881.9589,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Australian Government Funding, through the Natural Heritage Trust and National Action Plan for Salinity, for projects relating specifically to Weeds of National Significance (WONS) , that occur in the rangelands – Most funding allocated to non-rangeland habitats”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2144,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Kakadu National Park,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,500000,,,457810.8166,575490.4388,500000,457810.8166,575490.4388,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Kadadu NP spend about AU$0.5 million/year on M. pigra control”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2149,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus pyramidalis,,Giant rat’s tail grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,One-time,500000,,,457810.8166,575490.4388,500000,457810.8166,575490.4388,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,No,"“Meat and Livestock Australia has also invested about AU$0.5 million on research projects examining methods for controlling and managing giant rat’s tail grass (Sporobolus pyramidalis P.Beauv.)”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2153,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,Parkinsonia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Lake Eyre Basin,"Unit (300,000 ha and 500 km of creek line)",Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,One-time,1000000,,,915621.6331,1150980.878,1000000,915621.6331,1150980.878,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Lake Eyre Basin parkinsonia project involved .. treatment of 300 000 ha and 500 km of creek line at .. a landholder investment of over AU$1 million”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2155,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus ciliaris,,Buffel grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Bush Heritage rangelands,"Unit (360,000 ha)",Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,25000,,,22890.54083,28774.52194,25000,22890.54083,28774.52194,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Bush Heritage – conservation organisation with significant properties in the rangelands, area owned/managed, weeds targeted and estimated annual expenditure”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2157,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium strumarium,,Noogoora burr,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Country,Mid 1990s,Year,1992,1997,1992,1997,One-time,700000,,,640935.1432,805686.6143,700000,640935.1432,805686.6143,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“The attempted eradication of Noogoora burr (Xanthium occidentale Bertol.) represents one of the largest weed control programs in rangeland Western Australia - up to $700 000 spent per year in the mid 1990s when eradication was the aim”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2158,WoS,12904,Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands,"Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Mimosa,Mimosa pigra,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,"Queensland, Peter Faust Dam",Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,1000000,,,915621.6331,1150980.878,1000000,915621.6331,1150980.878,AUD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Over AU$1 million, sourced from various agencies, was spent on the M. pigra eradication program at Peter Faust Dam (Queensland) in 2003 alone”; Full reference: Martin, T. G., & van Klinken, R. D. (2006). Value for money? Investment in weed management in Australian rangelands. The Rangeland Journal, 28(1), 63-75.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2171,TC,23,The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa.,"Van Wilgen, B. W., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., Marais, C., & Magadlela, D.",,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Red water fern,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2001,2001,One-time,51000,,,70601.08481,211078.7892,51000,70601.08481,211078.7892,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Introduction of a biological control agent has brought the problem under control at a cost of US$ 51 000”; full reference: Van Wilgen, B. W., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., Marais, C., & Magadlela, D. (2001). The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa. Environment, development and sustainability, 3(2), 145-168.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2173,TC,23,The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa.,"Van Wilgen, B. W., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., Marais, C., & Magadlela, D.",,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,Jointed cactus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,40 years (Exact Unspecified period),Period,1961,2001,1961,2001,One-time,12000000,,,16612019.95,49665597.46,300000,415300.4989,1241639.936,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Costs of state-subsidized control efforts exceeded US $12 million over the past 40 years.”; full reference: Van Wilgen, B. W., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., Marais, C., & Magadlela, D. (2001). The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa. Environment, development and sustainability, 3(2), 145-168.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2176,TC,22,Conflicts of interest in environmental management: estimating the costs and benefits of a tree invasion.,"De Wit, M. P., Crookes, D. J., & Van Wilgen, B. W.",,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Van Wilgen, B. W., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., Marais, C., & Magadlela, D. (2001). The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa. Environment, development and sustainability, 3(2), 145-168.",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,1425000000,,,2142807052,4857376567,1425000000,2142807052,4857376567,USD,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,"Full reference: De Wit, M. P., Crookes, D. J., & Van Wilgen, B. W. (2001). Conflicts of interest in environmental management: estimating the costs and benefits of a tree invasion. Biological invasions, 3(2), 167-178.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2177,TC,22,Conflicts of interest in environmental management: estimating the costs and benefits of a tree invasion.,"De Wit, M. P., Crookes, D. J., & Van Wilgen, B. W.",,2001,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Van Wilgen, B. W., Richardson, D. M., Le Maitre, D. C., Marais, C., & Magadlela, D. (2001). The economic consequences of alien plant invasions: examples of impacts and approaches to sustainable management in South Africa. Environment, development and sustainability, 3(2), 145-168.",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1503724.247,3408685.31,1000000,1503724.247,3408685.31,USD,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,"Full reference: De Wit, M. P., Crookes, D. J., & Van Wilgen, B. W. (2001). Conflicts of interest in environmental management: estimating the costs and benefits of a tree invasion. Biological invasions, 3(2), 167-178.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2196,TC,535,Summary of a Survey of the Literature on the Economic Impact of Aquatic Weeds,"H. William Rockwell, Jr.",,2003,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,USA,"Unit (213,000 acres of water treated)",Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,13850000,,,18454756.4,18454756.4,13850000,18454756.4,18454756.4,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Using data from Lembi and Szmedra (both 1996), an estimate of $17 million as the total US cost of applying 2,4-D to 223,000 acres of aquatic weeds (at a cost of about $76/acre) is derived”; full reference: H. William Rockwell, Jr. (2003). Summary of a Survey of the Literature on the Economic Impact of Aquatic Weeds. Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Foundation, August, 2003.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2211,TC,577,The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species,"McNeely, J. A. (Editor)",,2001,English,Book,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Sour prickly pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,323000,,,51937.60155,1336832.332,323000,51937.60155,1336832.332,ZAR,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"“Currently, the annual SANP budget for controlling alien invasive species in the KNP amounts to R 660 000 (US$157,600). Herbicidal control measures for the control of O. stricta in 1998 alone amounted to R323 000 (US$77,133) (half of the section’s annual budget)”; full reference: McNeely, J. A. (Editor). 2001. The Great Reshuffling: Human Dimensions of Invasive Alien Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. Vi + 242pp.",Ivan Jaric,Yes
2214,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Bhutan,,Bhutan,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,2950000,,,3104017.103,,295000,310401.7103,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2215,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Brunei,,Brunei,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,6360000,,,6692050.431,,636000,669205.0431,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2216,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Cambodia,,Cambodia,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,165400000,,,174035399.6,,16540000,17403539.96,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2217,WoS,9545,Cost and disease burden of dengue in Cambodia,Beauté & Vong ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Cambodia,,Unspecified,Country,2006-2008,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,1500000,,,1686173.36,,500000,562057.7865,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2218,TC,109,Out-of-pocket health expenditure and debt in poor households: evidence from Cambodia,van Damme ,,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Cambodia,,Banteay Mancheay,Site,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,309580,,,428562.4281,,309580,428562.4281,,USD,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2219,TC,59,Economic burden of dengue infections in India,Garg et al ,,2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,India,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,2700000,,,3282987.268,11540314.25,2700000,3282987.268,11540314.25,USD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2220,TC,63,"Preliminary estimate of inmediate cost of chikungunya and dengue to Gujarat, india",Murtola et al ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,India,,Gujarat,Site,2003-2008,Period,2003,2008,2003,2008,One-time,20040000000,,,524427734.1,79177966449,3340000000,87404622.35,13196327741,INR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2221,TC,63,"Preliminary estimate of inmediate cost of chikungunya and dengue to Gujarat, india",Murtola et al ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,India,,Gujarat,Site,2003-2008,Period,2003,2008,2003,2008,One-time,1140000000,,,28646291.18,5149755608,190000000,4774381.864,858292601.4,INR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2222,TC,65,"Estimating the burden of disease and the economic cost attributable to chikungunya, Andhra Pradesh, India, 2005-2006",Seyler et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,India,,Andhra Pradesh,Country,2005-2006,Year,2005,2006,2006,2006,One-time,12400000,,,13939033.11,48998308.31,12400000,13939033.11,48998308.31,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2223,TC,56,Economic and disease burden of dengue,Shepard et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Diverse/Unspecified,,South Asia,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,301000000,,,328004214.1,,30100000,32800421.41,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Control/Medical care,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2224,TC,112,Economic and Disease Burden of Dengue Illness in India,Shepard et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,India,,Unspecified,Country,2006-2012,Period,2006,2012,2006,2012,One-time,3836000000,,,3971842304,17606779900,548000000,567406043.4,2515254271,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2225,TC,271,"Economic impact of chikungunya epidemic: ou-of-pocket health expenditures during the 2007 outbreak in Kerala, India",Vijayakumar et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,India,,Kerala,Country,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,13000000,,,15368561.02,68127294.74,13000000,15368561.02,68127294.74,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2226,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Indonesia,,Indonesia,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,3231630000,,,3400350776,13972539880,323163000,340035077.6,1397253988,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2227,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Indonesia,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1620675,,,1766073.853,4867771.393,1620675,1766073.853,4867771.393,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2228,TC,539,Surveillance of the chikungunya vector Aedes albopictus in Emilia Romagna (Northern Italy),Carrieri et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Unspecified,Country,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,523324,,,672433.1572,,523324,672433.1572,,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,2388(2228),no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2229,TC,130,Controllo della Zanzara-Tigre: analisi dei costi sostenuti dagli Enti Locali. Emilia-Romagna Report 2008–2011,Canali ,,2012,Itialian,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Emilia-Romagna,Site,2008-2011,Period,2008,2011,2008,2011,One-time,24360000,,,27707781.01,,6090000,6926945.253,,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2230,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Laos,,Laos,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,50930000,,,53589013.91,,5093000,5358901.391,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2231,TC,132,Immediate cost of dengue to Malaysia and Thailand: an estimate,Lim et al ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Malaysia,,Unspecified,Country,2002-2007,Period,2002,2007,2002,2007,One-time,798000000,,,897044227.3,,133000000,149507371.2,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2232,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Malaysia,,Malaysia,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,1279730000,,,1346543663,,127973000,134654366.3,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2233,TC,139,Dengue: Burden of disease and costs of illness,Suaya et al ,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Malaysia,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,12800000,,,17442839.01,,12800000,17442839.01,,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2235,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Myanmar,,Myanmar,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,144760000,,,152317802,,14476000,15231780.2,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2236,TC,120,Economic cost and burden of dengue in the Philippines,Edillo et al ,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Philippines,,Unspecified,Country,2008-2012,Period,2008,2012,2008,2012,One-time,345000000,,,356794053.8,,69000000,71358810.76,,USD,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2237,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Philippines,,Philippines,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,808290000,,,850490164,,80829000,85049016.4,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2238,TC,100,Economic impact of dengue illness and the cost-effectiveness of future vaccination programs in Singapore,Carrasco et al ,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Singapore,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2009,Period,2000,2009,2000,2009,One-time,383000000,,,417360843.9,,38300000,41736084.39,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care/Indirect cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2239,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Singapore,,Singapore,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,670900000,,,705927143.8,,67090000,70592714.38,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2240,TC,83,Examining the effect of publishing of bill sizes to reduce information asymmetry on healthcare costs.,Wong et al ,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Singapore,,Unspecified,Country,2004-2005,Year,2004,2005,2005,2005,One-time,13712828,,,16211264.15,,13712828,16211264.15,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2241,TC,117,Burden of symptomatic dengue infection in children at primary school in Thailand: a prospective study,Anderson et al ,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Hospital,Site,1998-2002,Period,1998,2002,1998,2002,One-time,5460,,,6454.79563,,1092,1290.959126,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2242,TC,76,The cost of routine Aedes aegypti control and of insecticide-treated curtain implementation,Baly et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Laem Chabang,Country,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,80000,,,94575.76015,,80000,94575.76015,,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2243,TC,140,Selective Primary Health Care: Strategies for Control of Disease in the Developing World. XI. Dengue,Halstead ,,1984,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Unspecified,Country,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,6445000,,,19170339.34,,6445000,19170339.34,,USD,1980,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2244,TC,132,Immediate cost of dengue to Malaysia and Thailand: an estimate,Lim et al ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2005,Period,2000,2005,2000,2005,One-time,810000000,,,910533614.1,,135000000,151755602.4,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2245,TC,89,The cost of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Thailand.,Okanurak et al,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Unspecified,Country,1994,Year,1994,Unspecified,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,7723600,,,12772512.15,,7723600,12772512.15,,USD,1994,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2246,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Thailand,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,2900280000,,,3051701262,,290028000,305170126.2,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2247,TC,86,"Dengue haemorrhagic fever in Thailand, 1987.",Ungchusak et al,,1988,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Unspecified,Country,1987,Year,1987,Unspecified,1987,1987,Potentially ongoing,16000000,,,34516288.96,,16000000,34516288.96,,USD,1987,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2248,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Timor-Leste,,Timor-Leste,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,3630000,,,3819519.35,,363000,381951.935,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2249,TC,101,Economic and disease burden of dengue in Southeast Asia,Shepard et al,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Vietnam,,Vietnam,Country,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,234530000,,,246774620.7,,23453000,24677462.07,,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2250,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Vietnam,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,6960000,,,7584416.379,,6960000,7584416.379,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2251,TC,81,"High household economic burden caused by hospitalization of patients with severe dengue fever cases in Can Tho province, Vietnam.",Tam et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Vietnam,,Unspecified,Country,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2007,2007,One-time,62600000,,,66833155.42,,62600000,66833155.42,,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2252,TC,93,Costs of dengue in three French territories of the Americas: an analysis of the hospital medical information system (PMSI) database,Uhart et al ,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,France,,Martinique/Guadeloupe/Guyane,Regional,2007-2011,Period,2007,2011,2007,2011,One-time,213000000,,,283031424,,42600000,56606284.79,,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2253,TC,56,Economic and disease burden of dengue,Shepard et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Diverse/Unspecified,,Southeastern Asia,Regional,2001-2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,One-time,9702000000,,,10572414901,,970200000,1057241490,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Control/Medical care,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2255,TC,70,Cost of dengue cases in eight countries in the Americas and Asia: a prospective study,Suaya et al ,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Cambodia/Malaysia/Thailand,,Unspecified,Regional,2001-2005,Period,2001,2005,2001,2005,One-time,444000000,,,507292891.2,,88800000,101458578.2,,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2256,TC,123,Impact of an outbreak of dengue fever: a case study from rural Puerto Rico,Torres et al,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico (Lares),Site,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,6500,,,12194.22635,,6500,12194.22635,,USD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2257,TC,131,Cost of dengue in Thailand,Kongsin et al ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,,Country,2001-2005,Period,2001,2005,2001,2005,One-time,221200000,,,248654364.8,,44240000,49730872.95,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2258,TC,106,The Chikungunya Epidemic on La Reunion Island in 2005-2006: A Cost-of-Illness Study,Soumahoro et al ,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Africa,France,,La Reunion,Site,2005-2006,Year,2005,2006,2006,2006,One-time,43900000,,,66501896.15,345479721.6,43900000,66501896.15,345479721.6,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2259,TC,111,"Household-level expenditure on protective measures against mosquitoes on the island of La Réunion, France.",Thuilliez et al ,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Africa,France,,La Reunion,Site,2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,28050000,,,29946805.27,159091928.2,28050000,29946805.27,159091928.2,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2260,TC,138,WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY FOR AN AREA-WIDE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO CONTROL THE ASIAN TIGER MOSQUITO IN NEW JERSEY,Halasa et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,New Jersey,Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,2610000,,,2971456.962,,2610000,2971456.962,,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2263,TC,62,RETOUR D'EXPERIENCE SUR L'EPIDEMIE DE ZIKA EN POLYNESIE FRANCAISE EN 2014,Loncke et al,,2015,French,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,French Polynesia,Site,2013-2014,Year,2013,2014,2014,2014,One-time,630000000,,,6055373.434,3663219717,630000000,6055373.434,3663219717,XPF,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2264,TC,62,RETOUR D'EXPERIENCE SUR L'EPIDEMIE DE ZIKA EN POLYNESIE FRANCAISE EN 2014,Loncke et al,,2015,French,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,French Polynesia,Site,2013-2014,Year,2013,2014,2014,2014,One-time,370000000,,,3556330.43,2151414754,370000000,3556330.43,2151414754,XPF,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2265,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,France,,Guyana,Site,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,16289368.5,,,17750769.15,99802422.18,2036171.063,2218846.143,12475302.77,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2267,TC,150,Coût d'une épidémie de dengue en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Une estimation pour la période 2012-2013,Roy,,2014,French,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012-2013,Year,2012,2013,2013,2013,One-time,325065956,,,3742077.981,1892381932,325065956,3742077.981,1892381932,XPF,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2273,TC,134,Historical analysis of the economic cost of dengue in Australia.,Canyon ,,2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,After 1990,Period,1990,Unspecified,1990,2008,Potentially ongoing,2700000,,,2640223.364,6692310.692,142105.2632,138959.1244,352226.8785,AUD,1991,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Control/Medical care,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2274,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Belize,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,90000,,,144771.4919,,90000,144771.4919,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2275,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Belize,,Belize,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,5979099.22,,,6515514.089,,747387.4025,814439.2611,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2276,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Bolivia,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,250000,,,402143.0329,,250000,402143.0329,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2277,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Bolivia,,Bolivia,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,320029312.5,,,348740741.3,,40003664.06,43592592.66,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2285,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,North America,Canada,,Canada,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,5093100.66,,,5550028.171,6341157.605,636637.5825,693753.5213,792644.7006,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2286,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Caribbean,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,22498080,,,36189784.5,,22498080,36189784.5,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2287,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Caribbean,Regional,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,2652800000,,,2890795944,,331600000,361349493,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2288,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Chile,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,12000,,,19302.86558,,12000,19302.86558,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2289,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,51887445.86,,,56542527.91,,6485930.733,7067815.989,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2297,TC,145,"Dengue haemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: lessons from the Cuban epidemic, 1981.",Kouri et al ,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Cuba,,Cuba,Country,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,43000000,,,115921276.7,,43000000,115921276.7,,USD,1981,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2302,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,,,,South America,Ecuador,,Ecuador,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,1034483,,,1664040.525,,1034483,1664040.525,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2303,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,,,,South America,Ecuador,,Ecuador,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,482673829.5,,,525976910.7,,60334228.69,65747113.83,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,Low,Value in the DB is based on calculation with an imprecise number of cases for the country.,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2306,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Guatemala,,Guatemala,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,2100000,,,3378001.477,,2100000,3378001.477,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2307,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Guatemala,,Guatemala,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,279095920.5,,,304135010.2,,34886990.06,38016876.27,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2313,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Nicaragua,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,500000,,,804286.0658,,500000,804286.0658,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2316,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Panama,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,1294000,,,2081492.338,,1294000,2081492.338,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2320,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Paraguay,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,185000,,,297585.8444,,185000,297585.8444,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2321,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Paraguay,,Paraguay,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,18521374.03,,,20183019.05,,2315171.754,2522877.381,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2322,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Peru,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,1200000,,,1930286.558,4737472.655,1200000,1930286.558,4737472.655,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2323,TC,136,"Economic burden of dengue virus infection at the household level among residents of Puerto Maldonado, Peru",Salmon Mulanovich et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Peru,,Puerto Maldonado,Site,2012-2013,Year,2012,2013,2013,2013,One-time,216076,,,230687.5542,402505.2687,216076,230687.5542,402505.2687,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2324,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Peru,,Peru,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,975787911,,,1063330721,1855306928,121973488.9,132916340.1,231913366,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2325,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Peru,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1935000,,,2108598.519,3679097.542,1935000,2108598.519,3679097.542,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2326,TC,69,Economic cost of dengue in Puerto Rico,Halasa et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,2002-2010,Period,2002,2010,2002,2010,One-time,173430000,,,185157733.9,,19270000,20573081.55,,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2327,TC,85,"Epidemic dengue fever in Puerto Rico, 1977: A cost analysis",Von allmen et al ,,1979,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,1977,Year,1977,Unspecified,1977,1977,Potentially ongoing,7272788,3651329,10894247,29413492.6,,7272788,29413492.6,,USD,1977,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2328,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Suriname,,Suriname,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,10732826.6,,,11695722.11,,1341603.325,1461965.263,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2329,TC,64,The feasibility of erradicating Aedes aegypti in the Americas,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Uruguay,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Year,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,10000,,,16085.72132,,10000,16085.72132,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2330,TC,73,Economic impact of dengue illness in the Americas,Shepard et al,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Uruguay,,Uruguay,Country,2000-2007,Period,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,10915122.09,,,11894372.24,,1364390.261,1486796.529,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2334,TC,92,Hemispheric plan to expand and intensify efforts to combat Aedes aegypti,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America/North America/South America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Regional,1996,Year,1996,Unspecified,1996,1996,Potentially ongoing,329909105,,,515570177.6,,329909105,515570177.6,,USD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2335,TC,92,Hemispheric plan to expand and intensify efforts to combat Aedes aegypti,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America/North America/South America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Continental,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,679000000,,,1036877980,,679000000,1036877980,,USD,1997,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2336,TC,92,Hemispheric plan to expand and intensify efforts to combat Aedes aegypti,Pan American Health Organization,,1998,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America/North America/South America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Continental,1998,Year,1998,Unspecified,1998,1998,Potentially ongoing,67819444,,,77211708.43,,67819444,77211708.43,,USD,1998,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2337,TC,92,Hemispheric plan to expand and intensify efforts to combat Aedes aegypti,Pan American Health Organization,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America/North America/South America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Continental,1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,62484555,,,91947699.75,,62484555,91947699.75,,USD,1997,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2341,TC,58,Critical review of Aedes aegypti control programs in the Caribbean and selected neighboring countries.,Nathan,,1993,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Diverse/Unspecified,,Unspecified,Regional,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,11282700,,,21166738.1,,11282700,21166738.1,,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2344,TC,139,Dengue: Burden of disease and costs of illness,Suaya et al,,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Cambodia,,2 cities,Site,2001-2005,Period,2001,2005,2001,2005,One-time,2839000,2312500,3190000,3563359.917,,567800,712671.9834,,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2345,TC,66,Economic cost of dengue public prevention activities in Puerto Rico,Pérez-Guerra et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,2002-2007,Period,2002,2007,2002,2007,One-time,46220232,38940000,56460000,54641419.69,,7703372,9106903.282,,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2348,TC,128,Aedes aegypti: economic impact of prevention versus palliation of diseases caused by the mosquito,Bueno et al. ,,2017,English,Poster,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Brazil,,Brazil,Country,2015-2017,Year,2015,2017,2015,2017,One-time,150019037,143702444,152103611,48747441.08,475226175.8,150019037,48747441.08,475226175.8,REA,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2351,TC,146,Effectiveness and feasibility of long-lasting insecticide-treated curtains and water container covers for dengue vector control in Colombia: a cluster randomised trial.,Quintero et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Colombia,,Girardot,Site,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,600336,,,631679.0547,2701260.82,600336,631679.0547,2701260.82,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2352,TC,148,"[Costs of an Aedes aegypti vector control program in municipalities in Colombia: a case study in Girón and Guadalajara de Buga, 2016].",Salinas Lopez et al ,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Colombia,,2 cities,Site,2016,Year,2016,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,244587,,,249796.9722,1068211.41,244587,249796.9722,1068211.41,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2353,TC,96,Costs of Dengue Control Activities and Hospitalizations in the Public Health Sector during an Epidemic Year in Urban Sri Lanka,Thalagala et al ,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Sri Lanka,,Colombo district,Site,2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,971360,,,1037045.589,,971360,1037045.589,,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2354,TC,115,An economic evaluation of vector control in the age of a dengue vaccine,Fitzpatrick et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Brazil,,Brazil,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,377600000,206900000,721700000,397314189.1,,377600000,397314189.1,,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2355,TC,115,An economic evaluation of vector control in the age of a dengue vaccine,Fitzpatrick et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,105500000,37800000,253700000,111008069.3,474705859,105500000,111008069.3,474705859,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2356,TC,115,An economic evaluation of vector control in the age of a dengue vaccine,Fitzpatrick et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,,,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,276300000,104700000,698400000,290725398.5,513069017.8,276300000,290725398.5,513069017.8,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2357,TC,115,An economic evaluation of vector control in the age of a dengue vaccine,Fitzpatrick et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Malaysia,,Malaysia,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,84500000,38100000,151700000,88911676.33,,84500000,88911676.33,,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2358,TC,115,An economic evaluation of vector control in the age of a dengue vaccine,Fitzpatrick et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Philippines,,Philippines,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,149500000,70100000,271000000,157305273.5,,149500000,157305273.5,,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2359,TC,115,An economic evaluation of vector control in the age of a dengue vaccine,Fitzpatrick et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Thailand,Country,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,58000000,29100000,104500000,61028132.86,,58000000,61028132.86,,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2360,TC,77,Sustainability and cost of a community-based strategy against Aedes aegypti in Northern and Central Vietnam,Kay et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Vietnam,,6 Communitities northern Vietnam,Site,1998-2000,Year,1998,2000,1998,2000,One-time,10736,,,12692.06701,,10736,12692.06701,,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2361,TC,72,"Cost-effectiveness of Increasing Access to Contraception during the Zika Virus Outbreak, Puerto Rico, 2016",Li et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,NA (extrapolation),Year,2017,Unspecified,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,191422342,,,195499848.5,,191422342,195499848.5,,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2362,TC,88,Citizen science provides a reliable and scalable tool to track disease-carrying mosquitoes.,Palmer et al,,2018,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Spain,Spain,Unspecified,Country,2014-2015,Year,2014,2015,2015,2015,One-time,480074,,,550635.7383,92646776.13,480074,550635.7383,92646776.13,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
2363,TC,112,Economic and Disease Burden of Dengue Illness in India,Shepard et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,India,,Unspecified,Country,2006-2012,Period,2006,2012,2006,2012,One-time,3864000000,,,4000833854,14350293681,552000000,571547693.4,2050041954,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2364,TC,72,"Cost-effectiveness of Increasing Access to Contraception during the Zika Virus Outbreak, Puerto Rico, 2016",Li et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,Public and social welfare,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,2016,Year,2016,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,256578162,,,262043559.1,,256578162,262043559.1,,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2367,TC,67,"Cost-Effectiveness of the Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Dengue in Colima, Mexico",Mendoza-Cano et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,,,NA,North America,Mexico,,4 Municipalities of Colima,Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,130105,,,148123.1448,225540.8587,130105,148123.1448,225540.8587,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2368,TC,57,"Economic costs and burden of dengue disease in Cavite Province, Philippines",Onuh et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Philippines,,Cavite province,Site,2009-2014,Period,2009,2014,2009,2014,One-time,13800000,,,14093955.18,,2300000,2348992.53,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2369,TC,98,Dengue fever in the Indian subcontinent: an overview,Raheel et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Bangladesh/India/Pakistan/Sri Lanka,,,Regional,2006-2008,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,60000000,,,67446934.38,,20000000,22482311.46,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2370,TC,104,Economic evaluation of cases of dengue fever attributed to the disaster of 2011 in Nova Friburgo (State of Rio de Janeiro/Brazil),Rodrigues Pereira,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Brazil,,Nova Friburgo,Site,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,282500,66000,499000,130833.3071,955036.7678,282500,130833.3071,955036.7678,REA,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2371,TC,114,Use of Multiple Data Sources to Estimate the Economic Cost of Dengue Illness in Malaysia,Shephard et al,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Malaysia,,Malaysia,Country,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,55830000,,,59605352.51,,55830000,59605352.51,,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2372,TC,138,WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY FOR AN AREA-WIDE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO CONTROL THE ASIAN TIGER MOSQUITO IN NEW JERSEY,Shepard et al ,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,North America,USA,,New Jersey,Site,2009-2011,Period,2009,2011,2009,2011,One-time,885225,580293,1096227,916573.0197,,295075,305524.3399,,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2373,TC,141,The global economic burden of dengue: a systematic analysis,Shepard et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse/Unspecified,Global,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,8900000000,3700000000,19700000000,9089579790,,8900000000,9089579790,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2374,TC,127,Cost-effectiveness of annual targeted larviciding campaigns in Cambodia against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti,Suaya et al,,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Cambodia,,Cambodia,Country,2001-2005,Period,2001,2005,2001,2005,One-time,2839000,,,3356257.288,,567800,671251.4576,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2375,TC,107,The containment of potential outbreaks triggered by imported Chikungunya cases in Italy: a cost utility epidemiological assessment of vector control measures.,Trentini et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Emilia-Romagna,Site,2007,Year,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,14900000,,,16481660.43,31423293138,14900000,16481660.43,31423293138,EUR,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
2376,TC,149,"Costs of the Municipal Dengue Control Program of Goiania, Brazil",Dos Santos et al,,2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Brazil,,Goiania,Site,2009-2010,Year,2009,2010,2010,2010,One-time,9054361,,,9363890.336,29049926.01,9054361,9363890.336,29049926.01,USD,2015,effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2380,TC,74,"Dengue incidence and associated costs in the periods before (2000-2008) and after (2009-2013) the construction of the hydroelectric power plants in Rondonia, Brazil",Abe et al.,,2018,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Brazil,,"Rondonia (237,765,293km², 52 municipalities)",Site,2000-2008,Period,2000,2008,2000,2008,One-time,3475202.04,,,3475202.04,10781241.4,386133.56,386133.56,1197915.711,USD,2017,effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2381,TC,74,"Dengue incidence and associated costs in the periods before (2000-2008) and after (2009-2013) the construction of the hydroelectric power plants in Rondonia, Brazil",Abe et al.,,2018,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Brazil,,"Rondonia ( 237,765,293km², 52 municipalities)",Site,2009-2013,Period,2009,2013,2009,2013,One-time,7094643.85,,,7094643.85,22009962.9,1418928.77,1418928.77,4401992.581,USD,2017,effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2382,TC,113,Household use of insecticide consumer products in a dengue-endemic area in Mexico,Loroño-Pino et al,,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,,,NA,North America,Mexico,,"Yucatan State (Merida city, 230 000 households)",Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,5700000,,,6085447.059,9266053.301,5700000,6085447.059,9266053.301,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Household use of insecticide,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2388,TC,108,"The Cost of Arbovirus Disease Prevention in Europe: Area-Wide Integrated Control of Tiger Mosquito, Aedes albopictus, in Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy",Canali et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Emilia-Romagna (280 municipalities),Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,7607000,,,12686111.9,18264499748,7607000,12686111.9,18264499748,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,2388(2228),no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2389,TC,108,"The Cost of Arbovirus Disease Prevention in Europe: Area-Wide Integrated Control of Tiger Mosquito, Aedes albopictus, in Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy",Canali et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Emilia-Romagna (280 municipalities),Site,2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,5937000,,,9423339.815,11677667733,5937000,9423339.815,11677667733,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2390,TC,108,"The Cost of Arbovirus Disease Prevention in Europe: Area-Wide Integrated Control of Tiger Mosquito, Aedes albopictus, in Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy",Canali et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Emilia-Romagna (280 municipalities),Site,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,5571000,,,8294139.098,13207163408,5571000,8294139.098,13207163408,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2391,TC,108,"The Cost of Arbovirus Disease Prevention in Europe: Area-Wide Integrated Control of Tiger Mosquito, Aedes albopictus, in Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy",Canali et al,,2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Europe,Italy,,Emilia-Romagna (280 municipalities),Site,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,5282000,,,8001435.432,12138827870,5282000,8001435.432,12138827870,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2392,TC,99,Persistent Symptoms of Dengue: Estimates of the Incremental Disease and Economic Burden in Mexico,Tiga et al,,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,,,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2010-2011,Year,2010,2011,2011,2011,One-time,22600000,13000000,29500000,24128263.78,36739088.52,22600000,24128263.78,36739088.52,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2393,TC,75,Economic and epidemiological impact of dengue illness over 16 years from a public health system perspective in Brazil to inform future health policies including the adoption of a dengue vaccine,Godoi et al.,,2018,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Brazil,,Brazil,Country,2000-2015,Period,2000,2015,2000,2015,One-time,170800000,,,170800000,529878841.5,10675000,10675000,33117427.59,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2394,TC,137,Economic cost and burden of dengue during epidemics and non-epidemic years in Taiwan,Luh et al,,2018,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,China,,Taiwan,Country,1998-2014,Period,1998,2014,1998,2014,One-time,8139957,3588377,42276824,8313347.038,,478821,489020.414,,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2395,TC,131,Cost of dengue in Thailand,Kongsin et al ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,,Country,2001-2005,Period,2001,2005,2001,2005,One-time,568800000,,,639396937.9,,113760000,127879387.6,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2396,WoS,9545,Cost and disease burden of dengue in Cambodia,Beauté & Vong ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Cambodia,,Unspecified,Country,2006-2008,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,9833598,,,11054100.65,,3277866,3684700.217,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2397,WoS,9545,Cost and disease burden of dengue in Cambodia,Beauté & Vong ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Cambodia,,Unspecified,Country,2006-2008,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,12194277,,,13707776.68,,4064759,4569258.892,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2398,TC,63,"Preliminary estimate of inmediate cost of chikungunya and dengue to Gujarat, india",Murtola et al ,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,India,,Gujarat,Site,2003-2008,Period,2003,2008,2003,2008,One-time,1596000000,,,59587822.61,7643740697,266000000,9931303.769,1273956783,INR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2399,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Indonesia,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,2970000,,,3236453.541,14576235.33,2970000,3236453.541,14576235.33,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2400,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Indonesia,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,472500,,,514890.3361,2318946.53,472500,514890.3361,2318946.53,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2401,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Vietnam,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,2640000,,,2876847.592,,2640000,2876847.592,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2402,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Vietnam,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,2400000,,,2615315.993,,2400000,2615315.993,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2403,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Peru,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1575000,,,1716301.12,4233995.73,1575000,1716301.12,4233995.73,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2404,TC,119,Cost of dengue outbreaks: literature review and country case studies,Stahl et al ,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,South America,Peru,,Unspecified,Country,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,990000,,,1078817.847,2661368.744,990000,1078817.847,2661368.744,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2406,TC,100,Economic impact of dengue illness and the cost-effectiveness of future vaccination programs in Singapore,Carrasco et al ,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Singapore,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2009,Period,2000,2009,2000,2009,One-time,500000000,,,544857498.5,,50000000,54485749.85,,USD,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2407,TC,85,"Epidemic dengue fever in Puerto Rico, 1977: A cost analysis",Von allmen et al ,,1979,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,1977,Year,1977,Unspecified,1977,1977,Potentially ongoing,1214700,,,4912637.281,,1214700,4912637.281,,USD,1977,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2408,TC,85,"Epidemic dengue fever in Puerto Rico, 1977: A cost analysis",Von allmen et al ,,1979,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,1977,Year,1977,Unspecified,1977,1977,Potentially ongoing,2300000,1161176,3450449,9301939.365,,2300000,9301939.365,,USD,1977,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2409,TC,69,Economic cost of dengue in Puerto Rico,Halasa et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,2002-2010,Period,2002,2010,2002,2010,One-time,175230000,,,187079454.1,,19470000,20786606.01,,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2410,TC,69,Economic cost of dengue in Puerto Rico,Halasa et al ,,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,USA,,Puerto Rico,Country,2002-2010,Period,2002,2010,2002,2010,One-time,69300000,,,73986224.77,,7700000,8220691.641,,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2413,TC,145,"Dengue haemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: lessons from the Cuban epidemic, 1981.",Kouri et al ,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Cuba,,Cuba,Country,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,41000000,,,110529589.4,,41000000,110529589.4,,USD,1981,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2414,TC,145,"Dengue haemorrhagic fever/dengue shock syndrome: lessons from the Cuban epidemic, 1981.",Kouri et al ,,1989,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Central America,Cuba,,Cuba,Country,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,19000000,,,51221029.24,,19000000,51221029.24,,USD,1981,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2416,TC,150,Coût d'une épidémie de dengue en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Une estimation pour la période 2012-2013,Roy,,2014,French,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012-2013,Year,2012,2013,2013,2013,One-time,806648065,,,9285930.769,4695927689,806648065,9285930.769,4695927689,XPF,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2417,TC,150,Coût d'une épidémie de dengue en Nouvelle-Calédonie. Une estimation pour la période 2012-2013,Roy,,2014,French,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012-2013,Year,2012,2013,2013,2013,One-time,516998120,,,5951553.048,3009721206,516998120,5951553.048,3009721206,XPF,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2418,TC,89,The cost of dengue haemorrhagic fever in Thailand.,Okanurak et al,,1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Unspecified,Country,1994,Year,1994,Unspecified,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,4872400,,,8057484.62,,4872400,8057484.62,,USD,1994,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
2419,TC,140,Selective Primary Health Care: Strategies for Control of Disease in the Developing World. XI. Dengue,Halstead ,,1984,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,,,,,Asia,Thailand,,Unspecified,Country,1981,Year,1981,Unspecified,1981,1981,Potentially ongoing,300000,,,892335.4232,,300000,892335.4232,,USD,1980,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NA,David Roiz/Frederic Jourdain,Yes
NE1,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,44454.94,,,61149.82834,69492.82795,44454.94,61149.82834,69492.82795,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,66632.38,,,76456.813,103692.7361,66632.38,76456.813,103692.7361,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,90631.84,,,102457.6064,141207.3371,90631.84,102457.6064,141207.3371,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE4,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,47604.17,,,53777.53477,74238.83786,47604.17,53777.53477,74238.83786,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE5,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,112227.18,,,129375.0998,169098.7449,112227.18,129375.0998,169098.7449,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE6,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,136314.07,,,154345.3207,201735.8832,136314.07,154345.3207,201735.8832,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE7,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3000,,,4126.638907,4689.658424,3000,4126.638907,4689.658424,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE8,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3000,,,3442.326974,4668.574173,3000,3442.326974,4668.574173,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE9,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE10,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE11,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3000,,,3458.389485,4520.261801,3000,3458.389485,4520.261801,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE12,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,3000,,,3396.831758,4439.803239,3000,3396.831758,4439.803239,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE13,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE14,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE15,TC,SP_10,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Manuel Alcántara de la Fuente- Jefe de Servicio de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de Aragón- Dirección General de Medio Natural y Gestión Forestal- Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,1000,,,1132.277253,1479.934413,1000,1132.277253,1479.934413,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species in Aragón, CCAA.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE28,TC,SP_11,"Control of Pennisetum setaceum in El Hierro island, Spain",Miguel Angel Rodríguez-Dominguez,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,Padrón-Mederos MA & Rodríguez-Domínguez MA. 2018 Datos actuales sobre la distribución de la especie invasora Pennisetum setaceum (Poaceae) en la isla de El Hierro. Vieraea- 46: 11-12. Santa Cruz de Tenerife.,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,El Hierro/ Canarias Spain,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Email response to E.A. request. Proyect name ""SEGUIMIENTO Y CARTOGRAFÍA DE POBLACIONES DE Pennisetumsetaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. ssp. orientale (Rich.) Maire EN LA ISLA DE EL HIERRO (ISLAS CANARIAS)""",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE29,TC,SP_11,"Control of Pennisetum setaceum in El Hierro island, Spain",Miguel Angel Rodríguez-Dominguez,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,Padrón-Mederos MA & Rodríguez-Domínguez MA. 2018 Datos actuales sobre la distribución de la especie invasora Pennisetum setaceum (Poaceae) en la isla de El Hierro. Vieraea- 46: 11-12. Santa Cruz de Tenerife.,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,El Hierro/ Canarias Spain,Site,2019,Year,1997,2019,1997,2019,One-time,6065.3,,,6867.601221,8976.246195,6065.3,6867.601221,8976.246195,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Email response to E.A. request. Proyect name ""SEGUIMIENTO Y CARTOGRAFÍA DE POBLACIONES DE Pennisetumsetaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. ssp. orientale (Rich.) Maire EN LA ISLA DE EL HIERRO (ISLAS CANARIAS)""",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE30,TC,SP_11,"Control of Pennisetum setaceum in El Hierro island, Spain",Miguel Angel Rodríguez-Dominguez,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,Padrón-Mederos MA & Rodríguez-Domínguez MA. 2018 Datos actuales sobre la distribución de la especie invasora Pennisetum setaceum (Poaceae) en la isla de El Hierro. Vieraea- 46: 11-12. Santa Cruz de Tenerife.,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,El Hierro/ Canarias Spain,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,19040.57,,,21525.0096,29665.82369,19040.57,21525.0096,29665.82369,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Email response to E.A. request. Proyect name ""SEGUIMIENTO Y CARTOGRAFÍA DE POBLACIONES DE Pennisetumsetaceum (Forssk.) Chiov. ssp. orientale (Rich.) Maire EN LA ISLA DE EL HIERRO (ISLAS CANARIAS)""",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE31,TC,SP_12,Control de la especies invasora Lampropeltis getula californiae en la isla de Gran Canaria,Gesplan- Cabildo de Gran Canaria- Gobierno de Canarias- Spain,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Lampropeltis,Lampropeltis californiae,,California Kingsnake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,Gran Canaria/ Spain,Site,2011-2015,Period,2011,2015,2011,2015,One-time,1025863,,,1177118.625,1596439.169,205172.6,235423.7251,319287.8338,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research/Information,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ppt of the First Project Monitoring Comitee, https://www.lifelampropeltis.com/index.php/homepage1/informes. the name of the project is Life-Lampropeltis.",Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE32,TC,SP_13,Plan post-life y actuaciones del plan estratégico para el control de la culebra real de california (lampropeltis californiae) en canarias. Proyecto formativo en centros de enseñanza: Actividades de sensibilización sobre la problemática de la culebra real de california en la Isla de Gran Canaria.,Gesplan- Cabildo de Gran Canaria- Gobierno de Canarias- Spain,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Lampropeltis,Lampropeltis californiae,,California Kingsnake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,Gran Canaria/ Spain,Site,28/11/2019 to 04/12/2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,50000,,,56613.86264,73996.72065,50000,56613.86264,73996.72065,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,https://www.gesplan.es/content/proyecto-formativo-en-centros-de-ense%C3%B1anza-actividades-de-sensibilizaci%C3%B3n-sobre-la,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE33,TC,SP_14,Ejecucion del plan post-Life+Lampropeltis y actuaciones del plan estrategico para el control de la culebra real de california (Lampropeltis californiae) en Canarias.,Gesplan- Cabildo de Gran Canaria- Gobierno de Canarias- Spain,NA,2020,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Lampropeltis,Lampropeltis californiae,,California Kingsnake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,Gran Canaria/ Spain,Site,2019-2022,Period,2019,2022,2019,2022,Potentially ongoing,1145000,,,1296457.454,1694524.903,286250,324114.3636,423631.2257,EUR,2020,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Detection/Information,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,The name of the project is Life-Lampropelti and the link is: https://www.gesplan.es/content/ejecucion-del-plan-post-lifelampropeltis-y-actuaciones-del-plan-estrat%C3%A9gico-para-el-control,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE44,TC,SP_16a,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,"1.- Contexto y objetivo del presente documento
Las especies exóticas invasoras (EEI, en adelante) son una de las principales causas de pérdida de biodiversidad. Esta problemática está bien presente en Cataluña y son muchos los esfuerzos desarrollados para minimizar sus efectos. A pesar del trabajo realizado, hemos de considerar que a menudo las especies exóticas invasoras han llegado para quedarse y que una vez instauradas es imposible su retirada.
La prevención, divulgación y la detección rápida y erradicación son los puntos más importantes para luchar contra las EEI.
El presente informe es fruto del esfuerzo de muchas entidades. El apartado 5 (Actuaciones) se ha redactado con la colaboración o información de más de 70 entidades públicas y privadas, que figuran en el Anexo.",2018,Spanish,Official report,See SP_16b,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Monk parakeet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Catalunya,Site,2015-2018,Period,2015,2018,2015,2018,One-time,200709.32,,,231377.0006,302419.5574,50177.33,57844.25016,75604.88935,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE45,TC,SP_17,Informe de las tareas de erradicación de la rana toro (Lithobates catesbeiana) en el delta del Ebro, Parc Natural del Delta de l’Ebre- Direcció General de Polítiques Ambientals i Medi Natural- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,"INTRODUCCIÓN El pasado 14 de junio de 2018 el personal técnico de la empresa GESNA Estudios Ambientales detectó 4 renacuajos que, por sus características físicas, podrían ser de rana toro (Lithobates catesbeiana) durante la elaboración de estudios biológicos en los filtros verdes del delta del Ebro. Al día siguiente, el personal técnico del Servicio de Fauna y Flora y del Parque Natural del Delta del Ebro del Departamento de Territorio y Sostenibilidad activaron el protocolo para confirmar la presencia de la especie en este lugar. Se realizaron muestreos en el interior del filtro y también en las zonas adyacentes. Se capturaron ejemplares que podían ser de ranas toro en una de las cubetas del filtro, y no se capturó ningún ejemplar en los alrededores. Se guardaron las muestras y se enviaron al instituto de Biología Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF) para confirmar genéticamente que se trataba de esta especie. Paralelamente, el 18 de junio se informa al Ministerio de la posible presencia de rana toro en el delta del Ebro, a la espera de la confirmación de la especie. El 4 de julio los resultados genéticos de las muestras enviadas confirmaron (morfológicamente y genéticamente) la presencia de la rana toro (Lithobates catesbeiana) en el filtro verde del hemidelta izquierdo. Una vez confirmada la especie, el 6 de julio se anunció a los medios de comunicación (nota de prensa) sin indicar el lugar del hallazgo, por motivos de seguridad. Desde la detección, se muestreó intensivamente para conocer el alcance de la introducción e indicar medidas de control y erradicación.",2019,Spanish,Official report,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobathes,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Delta Ebro river,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Delta del Ebro Natural Park,Site,Jun-Dec 2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,52437,,,60449.18982,79009.65601,52437,60449.18982,79009.65601,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE46,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,41412,,,47517.88155,64444.99788,41412,47517.88155,64444.99788,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE47,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,21692.54,,,24523.01227,33797.67869,21692.54,24523.01227,33797.67869,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE48,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,225197.16,,,254400.9926,351195.6084,225197.16,254400.9926,351195.6084,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE49,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,69668,,,80313.02623,104972.533,69668,80313.02623,104972.533,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE50,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,29090.49,,,32938.5001,43052.01724,29090.49,32938.5001,43052.01724,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE51,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Red-eared sliders,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,24022.32,,,33570.18333,37457.77387,24022.32,33570.18333,37457.77387,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE52,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Red-eared sliders,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,14288,,,19653.80557,22335.27985,14288,19653.80557,22335.27985,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE53,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Red-eared sliders,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,46247.77,,,53066.64872,71970.38153,46247.77,53066.64872,71970.38153,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE54,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Red-eared sliders,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15551.07,,,17580.19487,24229.06986,15551.07,17580.19487,24229.06986,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE55,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,7260,,,10145.5451,11320.44858,7260,10145.5451,11320.44858,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research/Risk assessment,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE56,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,11251,,,15476.27145,17587.78231,11251,15476.27145,17587.78231,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research/Risk assessment,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE58,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Extremadura,Unit (110 km),2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,326676.74,,,369888.6417,483460.1494,326676.74,369888.6417,483460.1494,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Prevention/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE60,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,25122.39,,,28380.29109,39178.43831,25122.39,28380.29109,39178.43831,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE61,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,43705.44,,,60118.85639,68321.19496,43705.44,60118.85639,68321.19496,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Risk assessment,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE62,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,52882.96,,,60680.14655,82296.00708,52882.96,60680.14655,82296.00708,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Risk assessment,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE63,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,5426.76,,,6130.508621,8463.04758,5426.76,6130.508621,8463.04758,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Risk assessment,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE64,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,16280.64,,,18768.26473,24530.91836,16280.64,18768.26473,24530.91836,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Risk assessment,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE65,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,13620.67,,,18735.86226,21292.0966,13620.67,18735.86226,21292.0966,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,SC516 (NE65),no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE66,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,29860.5,,,34263.20153,46468.65303,29860.5,34263.20153,46468.65303,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,SC483(NE66),no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE67,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,92198.01,,,104154.3564,143783.0576,92198.01,104154.3564,143783.0576,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,SC703(NE67),no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE68,TC,SP_18,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo sobre costes de las invasiones biológicas en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura ,Mª Jesús Palacios González- Consejería para la Transición Ecológica y Sostenibilidad- Dirección General de Sostenibilidad- Junta de Extremadura,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian basquet clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Guadiana River in Extremadura Autonomous Community,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,15488,,,17854.51212,23336.60492,15488,17854.51212,23336.60492,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Life INVASEP, Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana en territorio Extremeño",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE73,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,Yellow locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,39299.64,,,65804.86175,61640.11611,39299.64,65804.86175,61640.11611,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eliminación de Robinia pseudoacacia,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE74,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,Oenothera Biennis,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,49976.31,,,83682.2976,78386.10102,49976.31,83682.2976,78386.10102,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eliminación planta invasora Oenothera Biennis L,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE77,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Sea fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,53773.95,,,85694.74896,85506.87343,53773.95,85694.74896,85506.87343,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Tratamiento contra Carprobrotus edulis y otras,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE78,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Buddleja,Buddleja davidii,,Summer lilac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,55454.53,,,88372.93944,88179.1923,55454.53,88372.93944,88179.1923,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Tratamiento contra Budleja davidii ,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE79,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Amor de hombre,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,55644.47,,,88675.62988,88481.21913,55644.47,88675.62988,88481.21913,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Tratamiento contra Trasdescantia fluminensis,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE85,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,10675.42,,,12249.42874,16612.9967,10675.42,12249.42874,16612.9967,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Detection,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Detección y control de mapache en Asturias,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE86,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,14497.88,,,16635.48113,22561.47604,14497.88,16635.48113,22561.47604,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control Visón americano,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE87,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4831.05,,,5461.412007,7526.932099,4831.05,5461.412007,7526.932099,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Estudio de detección, control y erradicación del mapache ",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE88,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15160,,,17138.09752,23619.77016,15160,17138.09752,23619.77016,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Detection,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Detección y control del visón americano,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE92,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Aviles,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1845.25,,,2084.544191,2877.672598,1845.25,2084.544191,2877.672598,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection/Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Detección, control y erradicación del mapache (Procyon lotor) en Avilés",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE93,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,12644.5,,,14284.25364,19719.13354,12644.5,14284.25364,19719.13354,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Seguimiento y erradicación del mapache (Procyon lotor) en el Principado de Asturias,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE94,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,17182,,,19410.18197,26795.37763,17182,19410.18197,26795.37763,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Seguimiento y erradicación del visón americano (Neovison vison) en el Principado de Asturias,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE95,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Serpulidae,Ficopomatus,Ficopomatus enigmaticus,,Mercierella,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Villaviciosa River mouth,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,6327.9,,,7148.509517,9868.377961,6327.9,7148.509517,9868.377961,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Localización de poblaciones de Mercierella (Ficopomatus enigmaticus) en la RNP de la Ría de Villaviciosa,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE97,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus pumilus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Villaviciosa River mouth,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3993,,,4510.816938,6227.094802,3993,4510.816938,6227.094802,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Localización y erradicación de Spartina patens en la RNP de la Ría de Villaviciosa. Original name in document was a synonym: Spartina patens,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE98,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19965,,,22554.08469,31135.47401,19965,22554.08469,31135.47401,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Elaboración de un protocolo de actuación para el control de Cortaderia selloana,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE99,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,11858,,,13395.75939,18492.58456,11858,13395.75939,18492.58456,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Estudio diagnóstico de la invasión del plumero de la pampa,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE100,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,8177,,,9237.40298,12752.05464,8177,9237.40298,12752.05464,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Primeros estudios sobre la sensibilización al polen de la graminia plumero de la Pampa (Cortaderia selloana) en Asturias
",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE106,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,43714.42,,,49383.35741,68172.76172,43714.42,49383.35741,68172.76172,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Experimentación en el control y eliminación de Cortaderia selloana (plumero de la Pampa) en Asturias,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE107,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Villaviciosa River mouth,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4371.54,,,4938.44645,6817.429004,4371.54,4938.44645,6817.429004,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eliminación de Cortaderia selloana en la RNP de la Ría de Villaviciosa,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE108,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Nalon River Estuary/ Soto del Barco/Muros del Nalon,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,11914,,,13459.02154,18579.91672,11914,13459.02154,18579.91672,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control y eliminación de Cortaderia sellana en la Ría del Nalón,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE109,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,79990.26,,,92212.49138,120525.6389,79990.26,92212.49138,120525.6389,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Exterminación de nidos de Vespa velutina en el Principado de Asturias. Año 2018,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE110,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,59979.58,,,69144.24961,90374.4681,59979.58,69144.24961,90374.4681,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Detección y confirmación de nidos de Vespa velutina en el Principado de Asturias durante el año 2018,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE111,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,17956.4,,,20700.07499,27055.87633,17956.4,20700.07499,27055.87633,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Plan de acción contra el ""Plumero de la Pampa""(Cortaderia selloana) en el Principado de Asturias",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE112,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Gozón/ Asturias,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1793.58,,,2067.632738,2702.48372,1793.58,2067.632738,2702.48372,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Situación poblacional y extracción de mapache en el concejo de Gozón,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE113,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,440000,,,507230.4579,662971.7307,440000,507230.4579,662971.7307,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ejecución Plan de Acción contra el plumero de la Pampa,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE114,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,448285.67,,,507583.6669,663433.3899,448285.67,507583.6669,663433.3899,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Plan de actuaciones contra la Vespa velutina en el Principado de Asturias. Año 2019,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE115,TC,SP_19,"ACTUACIONES REALIZADAS EN EL PRINCIPADO DE ASTURIAS PARA EL ESTUDIO, CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE ESPECIES INVASORAS. AÑOS 2008-2019			",Teresa Sánchez Corominas- Dirección General de Medio Natural- Consejería de Desarrollo Rural- Agroganadería y Pesca del Principado de Asturias,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Asturias,Asturias,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,400000,,,452910.9011,591973.7652,400000,452910.9011,591973.7652,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Plan de actuación contra el plumero de la Pampa. Fase I. Año 2019,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE116,TC,SP_20,"Control of invasive ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in an island Biosphere Reserve (La Palma, Canary Islands): combining methods and social engagement",Susana Saavedra & Félix M. Medina,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,SP_21,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve/ Canarias,Site,May 2015 – Jun 2016,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,One-time,18297,,,20684.41757,28507.31758,18297,20684.41757,28507.31758,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm., Table 2, Approximate cost of the program to control ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve",Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE117,TC,SP_20,"Control of invasive ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in an island Biosphere Reserve (La Palma, Canary Islands): combining methods and social engagement",Susana Saavedra & Félix M. Medina,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,SP_21,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve/ Canarias,Site,Dec 2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,7630,,,8754.984937,11873.74031,7630,8754.984937,11873.74031,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm., Table 2, Approximate cost of the program to control ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve",Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE118,TC,SP_20,"Control of invasive ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in an island Biosphere Reserve (La Palma, Canary Islands): combining methods and social engagement",Susana Saavedra & Félix M. Medina,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,SP_21,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve/ Canarias,Site,Dec 2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,802.34,,,920.6388747,1248.594601,802.34,920.6388747,1248.594601,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm., Table 2, Approximate cost of the program to control ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve",Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE119,TC,SP_20,"Control of invasive ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in an island Biosphere Reserve (La Palma, Canary Islands): combining methods and social engagement",Susana Saavedra & Félix M. Medina,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,SP_21,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve/ Canarias,Site,Jan 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,923.95,,,1044.508259,1439.543973,923.95,1044.508259,1439.543973,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm., Table 2, Approximate cost of the program to control ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve",Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE120,TC,SP_20,"Control of invasive ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in an island Biosphere Reserve (La Palma, Canary Islands): combining methods and social engagement",Susana Saavedra & Félix M. Medina,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,SP_21,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve/ Canarias,Site,Dec 2017 - May 2018,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,One-time,18644.44,,,21493.24509,28092.58331,18644.44,21493.24509,28092.58331,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm., Table 2, Approximate cost of the program to control ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve",Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE121,TC,SP_20,"Control of invasive ring-necked parakeet (Psittacula krameri) in an island Biosphere Reserve (La Palma, Canary Islands): combining methods and social engagement",Susana Saavedra & Félix M. Medina,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,SP_21,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,Spain,Canary Islands,La Palma Island Biosphere Reserve/ Canarias,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,3414,,,3865.594541,5052.496086,3414,3865.594541,5052.496086,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Personnal communication,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE147,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Tuna cactus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tierra de Calderona Natural Park/ Valencia/ Spain,Site,6 months in 2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,165517.52,,,246663.9325,255935.9404,165517.52,246663.9325,255935.9404,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 7-8,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE148,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva Beach/ Valencia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,686,,,1022.317503,1060.746047,686,1022.317503,1060.746047,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Test in 4 sites of 30m2 each for chemical control of Agave americana and economic study Pg 16-17,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE149,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Marjal del Grao de Castellon Protected area,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,10582.27,,,17145.1296,17064.54877,10582.27,17145.1296,17064.54877,EUR,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 12",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE150,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Marjal del Grao de Castellon Protected area,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,40882.2,,,68454.76241,64122.30633,40882.2,68454.76241,64122.30633,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 13",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE151,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Marjal del Grao de Castellon Protected area,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2712.78,,,4323.115581,4313.637665,2712.78,4323.115581,4313.637665,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 14",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE152,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Marjal del Grao de Castellon Protected area,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,16539.62,,,24648.31343,25574.83461,16539.62,24648.31343,25574.83461,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 15",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE153,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Marjal del Grao de Castellon Protected area,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4777.5,,,7246.676892,7290.158218,4777.5,7246.676892,7290.158218,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 16",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE154,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,SP_34 pg 18,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Albaida River/ Valencia,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,114416.28,,,185374.3998,184503.1539,114416.28,185374.3998,184503.1539,EUR,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 17",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE155,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,SP_34 pg 18,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar River/ Altea/ Alicante,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,773.4,,,1253.043367,1247.154157,773.4,1253.043367,1247.154157,EUR,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 18",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE156,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,SP_34 pg 18,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar River/ Altea/ Alicante,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,1031.2,,,1726.681808,1617.401272,1031.2,1726.681808,1617.401272,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 19",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE157,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,SP_34 pg 18,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar River/ Altea/ Alicante,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1577.45,,,2350.808666,2439.174712,1577.45,2350.808666,2439.174712,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 20",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE158,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,SP_34 pg 18,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar River/ Altea/ Alicante,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,232.82,,,353.1494116,355.2683697,232.82,353.1494116,355.2683697,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 13, Tabla 21",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE159,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Marjal del Grao de Castellon Protected area,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7852.9,,,10771.57969,12063.62679,7852.9,10771.57969,12063.62679,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 20-21,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE160,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar River/ Altea/ Alicante,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1191.6,,,1634.480811,1830.536194,1191.6,1634.480811,1830.536194,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 20-21,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE161,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2010-2012,Period,2010,2012,2010,2012,One-time,3682.85,,,5146.628205,5742.632788,1227.616667,1715.542735,1914.210929,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg 27 Estimation of the costs of control with two different methods for 15 m2: Chemical method, costs: 255,85 euros; Manual method, costs: 3427 euros.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE162,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela/ Alicante,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,943624,,,1318674.91,1471383.88,943624,1318674.91,1471383.88,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 11,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE163,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Marjal del Grao de Castellon Protected area,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,267.4,,,373.6802699,416.954263,267.4,373.6802699,416.954263,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 24,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE164,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,Cylindropuntia pallida,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,3 last years,Period,2010,2013,2010,2013,Potentially ongoing,17000,,,19506.51952,26455.25365,4250,4876.62988,6613.813412,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 11, Annual average costs calculated from the costs of 2012 to 2014",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE165,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Sea fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Dunes of Safor,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,33459,,,38392.27274,52068.60775,33459,38392.27274,52068.60775,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 18-19, FEDER funds, 5000m2 managed within 27.5Ha of dune ecosystem",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE166,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Sea fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Dunes of Guardamar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,80680,,,92575.64675,125553.5214,80680,92575.64675,125553.5214,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 19, 31Ha managed in dune ecosystem",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE167,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Sea fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Dunes of Guardamar,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,270127,,,305157.3872,421263.8211,270127,305157.3872,421263.8211,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 18, 23000 m2 in dune ecosystem",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE169,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrográfica del Guadiana,Unit (River),2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,4500000,,,7171248.724,7155526.615,4500000,7171248.724,7155526.615,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE170,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,El Jacinto de Agua (Eichhornia crassipes) en la cuenca del Guadiana. Experiencias de manejo- 2012- Cifuentes-  Jornadas sobre especies invasoras de ríos y zonas húmedas. Banyoles- Abril 2013.,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrográfica del Guadiana,Unit (River),2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,4000000,,,5961035.002,6185108.149,4000000,5961035.002,6185108.149,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE171,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,SP_32b_El Jacinto de Agua (Eichhornia crassipes) en la cuenca del Guadiana. Experiencias de manejo- 2012- Cifuentes-  Jornadas sobre especies invasoras de ríos y zonas húmedas. Banyoles- Abril 2013.,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrográfica del Guadiana,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1300000,,,1971884.869,1983716.522,1300000,1971884.869,1983716.522,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE172,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,SP_32b_El Jacinto de Agua (Eichhornia crassipes) en la cuenca del Guadiana. Experiencias de manejo- 2012- Cifuentes-  Jornadas sobre especies invasoras de ríos y zonas húmedas. Banyoles- Abril 2013.,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,800000,,,1097335.22,1228960.184,800000,1097335.22,1228960.184,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE173,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1300000,,,1816695.404,2027077.569,1300000,1816695.404,2027077.569,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE174,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,500000,,,687773.1512,781609.7373,500000,687773.1512,781609.7373,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE175,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1400000,,,1606419.254,2178667.947,1400000,1606419.254,2178667.947,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE176,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2400000,,,2713155.28,3739277.597,2400000,2713155.28,3739277.597,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE177,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000000,,,3389043.529,4678508.491,3000000,3389043.529,4678508.491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE178,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,6500000,,,7493177.219,9793900.568,6500000,7493177.219,9793900.568,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE179,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,7400000,,,8378851.67,10951514.66,7400000,8378851.67,10951514.66,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE180,TC,SP_32,"Gobernanza y estrategias para la lucha contra las especies invasoras en la Cuenca del Guadiana, Anexo II, Gobernanza y estrategia para la lucha de Eichhornia crassipes (camalote o Jacinto de agua) en la cuenca del Guadiana.",Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2016,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River),2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,1400000,,,1585188.154,2071908.178,1400000,1585188.154,2071908.178,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Information/Education/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In Grafico 1 pg 49, but I ask for the data and send me, so correct data is in SP_32c. Data from previous years already in the English Invacost database",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE181,TC,SP_33,Control de especies invasoras en ríos cantábricos: el caso de Fallopia japonica y sus implicaciones con las técnicas de bioingeniería,Juan Antonio Martín Ventura- Jefe del Servicio de Estudios Medioambientales e Hidrológicos- Confederación Hidrográfica del Cantábrico- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2013,Spanish,Slideshow presentation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River,11,N,Europe,Spain,Cantabria,Saja River (from Villanueva de La Peña to San Pedro de Rudagüera/ in Cantabria) and Aranguin River (in Pravia/ Asturias),Unit (River),April-Dec 2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,468357.76,,,746379.9975,744743.6483,468357.76,746379.9975,744743.6483,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 11-22; 20+30= 50 has. managed ; Teams of 6 operarios + capataz; Round up (2-5%),  2 protocols in relation with water proximity; 166 working days ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE182,TC,SP_35,Proyecto Life+ Estuarios del País Vasco: dos años de control de Baccharis halimifolia en la costa vasca,Estela Beteta Merino,NA,2013,Spanish,Slideshow presentation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Baccharis halimifolia,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Estuary,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Basque country,Urdaibai/ Lea and Txingudi Estuaries,Site,2010-2014,Period,2010,2014,2010,2014,One-time,1852825,,,2589245.124,2889092.305,370565,517849.0248,577818.461,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 5,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE184,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia dealbata,,Silver wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,23172.18,,,35148.3624,35359.2587,23172.18,35148.3624,35359.2587,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE185,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,Tasmanian blackwood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,6717.96,,,10190.03359,10251.17557,6717.96,10190.03359,10251.17557,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE186,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3294.97,,,4997.92422,5027.912637,3294.97,4997.92422,5027.912637,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE187,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Arctotheca,Arctotheca calendula,,Espumilla,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3168.15,,,4805.559266,4834.393461,3168.15,4805.559266,4834.393461,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE188,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3492.65,,,5297.772066,5329.559623,3492.65,5297.772066,5329.559623,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE189,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Buddleja,Buddleja davidii,,Summer lilac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3918.26,,,5943.352004,5979.013153,3918.26,5943.352004,5979.013153,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE191,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3846.79,,,5834.943841,5869.954523,3846.79,5834.943841,5869.954523,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE192,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Helichrysum,Helichrysum petiolare,,Licorice-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,16086.81,,,24401.02863,24547.43906,16086.81,24401.02863,24547.43906,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE194,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera glazioviana,,Enotera,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3173.9,,,4814.281065,4843.167592,3173.9,4814.281065,4843.167592,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE196,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Phytolaccaceae,Phytolacca,Phytolacca americana,,Arbre de tinta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3490.35,,,5294.283347,5326.049971,3490.35,5294.283347,5326.049971,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE197,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio mikanioides,,Cape-ivy,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,5213.75,,,7908.395949,7955.847705,5213.75,7908.395949,7955.847705,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE198,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Stenotaphrum,Stenotaphrum secundatum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3338.65,,,5064.179551,5094.565512,3338.65,5064.179551,5094.565512,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE199,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Amor de hombre,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,27664.66,,,41962.71111,42214.49471,27664.66,41962.71111,42214.49471,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE200,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Iridaceae,Crocosmia,Crocosmia crocosmiiflora,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,6182.58,,,9377.950731,9434.220073,6182.58,9377.950731,9434.220073,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE202,TC,SP_37,"Proxecto de actuación en materia de expecies exóticas invasoras na reserva da biosfera do río Eo, Oscos e Terras do Burón",Jorge Mouriño Lourido- Arcea Xestión de Recursos Naturais SL; Dirección Xeral de Conservación da Natureza- Xunta de Galicia,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Zantedeschia,Zantedeschia aethiopica,,Serpentina brava,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Biosphere Reserve - Eo River - Oscos & Terras de Buron - Galicia,Unit (River),2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3570.91,,,5416.479535,5448.979358,3570.91,5416.479535,5448.979358,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE203,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,12000,,,14878.21558,22225.60859,12000,14878.21558,22225.60859,EUR,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pg 26  La Dirección General de la Naturaleza del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, subvencionó con 12.000 €, en el año 2001, el estudio “Localización y evaluación de una nueva invasión biológica: el mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en el Ebro”, realizado por el Grup Natura Freixes de Flix",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE204,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,88876.4,,,133958.1645,155801.2141,88876.4,133958.1645,155801.2141,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education/Information/Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 26  Los costes incurridos en estudios, proyectos y obras por la Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro (C.H.E.), -organismo autónomo del Ministerio de Medio Ambiente- en sus diversas actuaciones se inician en 2003 con el “Inventario de embarcaderos y accesos a las zonas afectadas y de riesgo por el mejillón cebra”, el diseño, organización y realización de una Jornada Técnica de Información y Debate sobre el mejillón cebra, junto con los carteles y tríptico informativo de la citada jornada. Sobre el terreno, diseño, realización y colocación de 12 paneles informativos sobre el mejillón cebra, y colaboración para la Estación de Lavado y Desinfección en Fayón. El coste ascendió a 88.876,40 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE205,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,144296.29,,,232930.2072,244272.2432,144296.29,232930.2072,244272.2432,EUR,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg 26  En el año 2004 los costes resultantes como consecuencia de la redacción del “Estudio de los efectos ambientales del descenso temporal de la cota del embalse de Ribarroja como medida de control de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha)” y el “Estudio de las comunidades faunísticas del entorno del embalse de Ribarroja en la zona afectada por el mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha)”, junto con el apoyo de los trabajos relacionados con el mejillón cebra, traducciones de artículos e informaciones, y de la prueba de retirada manual del mejillón cebra con Pontoneros, ascendieron a 144.296,29 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE206,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,64956.66,,,101430.8064,105950.9474,64956.66,101430.8064,105950.9474,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring/Education/Information/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pg 27 El Gobierno de Aragón se ha visto afectado a través de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo tanto por el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza (...) pertenecientes al Departamento de Medio Ambiente. En el año 2002 el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza tuvo unos costes referidos al control del mejillón cebra de 18.053,00 €. Esta cantidad sufrió un descenso en 2003, pasando a 14.990,88 €. En el año 2004 la adquisición de materiales para el control, así como el seguimiento de la expansión en Aragón del mejillón cebra y la campaña de sensibilización, elevaron los costes a la cantidad de 53.789,92 €. El Plan de Acción contra el mejillón cebra en 2005, así como su vertiente educativa supuso unos costes, en 2005, de 52.598,93 €. Las propuestas existentes dentro del Servicio Provincial para 2006 ascienden a un gasto estimado de 60.000,00 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE207,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,18053,,,23262.26404,33141.34301,18053,23262.26404,33141.34301,EUR,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring/Education/Information/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pg 27 El Gobierno de Aragón se ha visto afectado a través de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo tanto por el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza (...) pertenecientes al Departamento de Medio Ambiente. En el año 2002 el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza tuvo unos costes referidos al control del mejillón cebra de 18.053,00 €. Esta cantidad sufrió un descenso en 2003, pasando a 14.990,88 €. En el año 2004 la adquisición de materiales para el control, así como el seguimiento de la expansión en Aragón del mejillón cebra y la campaña de sensibilización, elevaron los costes a la cantidad de 53.789,92 €. El Plan de Acción contra el mejillón cebra en 2005, así como su vertiente educativa supuso unos costes, en 2005, de 52.598,93 €. Las propuestas existentes dentro del Servicio Provincial para 2006 ascienden a un gasto estimado de 60.000,00 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE208,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,14990.88,,,22594.87073,26279.1619,14990.88,22594.87073,26279.1619,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring/Education/Information/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pg 27 El Gobierno de Aragón se ha visto afectado a través de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo tanto por el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza (...) pertenecientes al Departamento de Medio Ambiente. En el año 2002 el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza tuvo unos costes referidos al control del mejillón cebra de 18.053,00 €. Esta cantidad sufrió un descenso en 2003, pasando a 14.990,88 €. En el año 2004 la adquisición de materiales para el control, así como el seguimiento de la expansión en Aragón del mejillón cebra y la campaña de sensibilización, elevaron los costes a la cantidad de 53.789,92 €. El Plan de Acción contra el mejillón cebra en 2005, así como su vertiente educativa supuso unos costes, en 2005, de 52.598,93 €. Las propuestas existentes dentro del Servicio Provincial para 2006 ascienden a un gasto estimado de 60.000,00 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE209,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,53789.92,,,86830.34895,91058.36623,53789.92,86830.34895,91058.36623,EUR,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring/Education/Information/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pg 27 El Gobierno de Aragón se ha visto afectado a través de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo tanto por el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza (...) pertenecientes al Departamento de Medio Ambiente. En el año 2002 el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza tuvo unos costes referidos al control del mejillón cebra de 18.053,00 €. Esta cantidad sufrió un descenso en 2003, pasando a 14.990,88 €. En el año 2004 la adquisición de materiales para el control, así como el seguimiento de la expansión en Aragón del mejillón cebra y la campaña de sensibilización, elevaron los costes a la cantidad de 53.789,92 €. El Plan de Acción contra el mejillón cebra en 2005, así como su vertiente educativa supuso unos costes, en 2005, de 52.598,93 €. Las propuestas existentes dentro del Servicio Provincial para 2006 ascienden a un gasto estimado de 60.000,00 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE210,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,52598.93,,,82134.02419,85794.22752,52598.93,82134.02419,85794.22752,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring/Education/Information/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pg 27 El Gobierno de Aragón se ha visto afectado a través de las actuaciones llevadas a cabo tanto por el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza (...) pertenecientes al Departamento de Medio Ambiente. En el año 2002 el Servicio Provincial de Medio Ambiente de Zaragoza tuvo unos costes referidos al control del mejillón cebra de 18.053,00 €. Esta cantidad sufrió un descenso en 2003, pasando a 14.990,88 €. En el año 2004 la adquisición de materiales para el control, así como el seguimiento de la expansión en Aragón del mejillón cebra y la campaña de sensibilización, elevaron los costes a la cantidad de 53.789,92 €. El Plan de Acción contra el mejillón cebra en 2005, así como su vertiente educativa supuso unos costes, en 2005, de 52.598,93 €. Las propuestas existentes dentro del Servicio Provincial para 2006 ascienden a un gasto estimado de 60.000,00 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE213,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,12020.24,,,15488.72745,22066.52063,12020.24,15488.72745,22066.52063,EUR,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Information,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg 28 Durante 2002, el Departament de Medi Ambient editó y difundió un tríptico informativo, con un coste total de 12.020,24 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE214,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,12000,,,15462.64712,22029.36443,12000,15462.64712,22029.36443,EUR,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pg 28 Durante 2002, el Departament de Medi Ambient  subvencionó al Grup de Natura Freixe por un importe de 12.000 € para la elaboración del documento “Localització i avaluació de l'extensió de la invasió biológica per musclo zebra (Dreissena polymorpha) a l'Ebre a l'any 2002”. ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE215,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,2230,,,3361.147693,3909.212204,2230,3361.147693,3909.212204,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg 28. En el año 2005 el Departament financió a la Universidad de Lleida para la realización de diversos estudios por importe de 9.000 €, y durante los años 2003, 2004 y 2005 los costes de conferencias, viajes, reuniones, etc, han ascendido a 2.230, 2.122 y 1.338 €, respectivamente",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE216,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,2122,,,3425.43734,3592.231651,2122,3425.43734,3592.231651,EUR,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg 28. En el año 2005 el Departament financió a la Universidad de Lleida para la realización de diversos estudios por importe de 9.000 €, y durante los años 2003, 2004 y 2005 los costes de conferencias, viajes, reuniones, etc, han ascendido a 2.230, 2.122 y 1.338 €, respectivamente",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE217,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,10338,,,16142.94325,16862.33397,10338,16142.94325,16862.33397,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg 28. En el año 2005 el Departament financió a la Universidad de Lleida para la realización de diversos estudios por importe de 9.000 €, y durante los años 2003, 2004 y 2005 los costes de conferencias, viajes, reuniones, etc, han ascendido a 2.230, 2.122 y 1.338 €, respectivamente",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE218,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),April-Oct 2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,14000,,,21861.2116,22835.43002,14000,21861.2116,22835.43002,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 28. La Agencia Catalana de l’Aigua financió, a través del Institut per al Desenvolupament de les Comarques de l'Ebre, (IDECE), la descontaminación del mejillón cebra en las embarcaciones. En el periodo de Abril a Octubre de 2005, se llevaron 99 actuaciones por medio de un equipo de limpieza y desinfección móvil, lo que representó un coste de 14.000 €. ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE219,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,5880,,,7290.325636,10890.54821,5880,7290.325636,10890.54821,EUR,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg 28. El Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaria ha participado y prestado asesoramiento en la elaboración de diversos proyectos y estudios: en 2001, “Localización y evaluación de una nueva invasión biológica: el mejillón cebra Dreissena polymorpha en el Ebro. 2001” (M.M.A.) y “Plan estratégico de actuaciones medio-ambientales en relación al Mejillón Cebra”, (Delegació de Medi Ambient de les Terres de l’Ebre), con un coste de 5.880 €; en 2002, ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE220,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,6910,,,8903.907635,12685.24235,6910,8903.907635,12685.24235,EUR,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"pg 28-29. El Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaria ha participado y prestado asesoramiento en la elaboración de diversos proyectos y estudios: en 2002, “Localización y evaluación de la invasión biológica del mejillón cebra Dreissena polymorpha en el Ebro, 2002” (Departament de Medi Ambient. Generalitat de Catalunya), “Plan de prioridades de actuación en relación al mejillón cebra”, (Consorcio para la Protección Integra del Delta del Ebro. M.M.A. y G. C.), con coste de 6.910 €, ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE221,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,2304,,,3472.683536,4038.93494,2304,3472.683536,4038.93494,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg 29 El Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentaria ha participado y prestado asesoramiento en la elaboración de diversos proyectos y estudios: en 2003, “Proposta d’estudis i actuacions de recerca i gestió al riu Ebre”, (Delegació Terriotorial del Departament de Medi Ambient a les Terres de l’Ebre), por un importe de 2.304 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE222,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Water supply center,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Fayon/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,2998,,,3863.084673,5503.669547,2998,3863.084673,5503.669547,EUR,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 29. Los incrementos de gastos de limpieza de las infraestructuras de abastecimiento motivados por el mejillón cebra ascendieron en el periodo 2002-2004 a 2.998, 3.058 y 3.150 €, respectivamente. ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE223,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Water supply center,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Fayon/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,3058,,,4609.143339,5360.704448,3058,4609.143339,5360.704448,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 29. Los incrementos de gastos de limpieza de las infraestructuras de abastecimiento motivados por el mejillón cebra ascendieron en el periodo 2002-2004 a 2.998, 3.058 y 3.150 €, respectivamente. ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE224,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Water supply center,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Fayon/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,3150,,,5084.885778,5332.483365,3150,5084.885778,5332.483365,EUR,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 29. Los incrementos de gastos de limpieza de las infraestructuras de abastecimiento motivados por el mejillón cebra ascendieron en el periodo 2002-2004 a 2.998, 3.058 y 3.150 €, respectivamente. ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE225,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Fayon town.,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Fayon/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,24290,,,37929.20213,39619.47109,24290,37929.20213,39619.47109,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 29. En 2005, las obras necesarias para la lucha contra el mejillón cebra supusieron (...)  y por el Ayuntamiento de Fayón (15.379,8 €).A partir de la ejecución de las obras de mejora en 2005, los costes de explotación y mantenimiento ascienden a 8.900 €, con previsión para el año 2006 de 9.400 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE227,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Water supply center,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Fabara and Nonaspe/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,4000,,,4959.405195,7408.536198,4000,4959.405195,7408.536198,EUR,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 29 En la Mancomunidad Fabara-Nonaspe, la toma del abastecimiento, ubicada en el remanso del embalse de Ribarroja en el cauce del río Matarraña, ha sido afectada por el mejillón cebra. La Mancomunidad Fabara-Nonaspe, responsable del abastecimiento de ambas poblaciones, desde 2001 realiza limpiezas de la toma con cadencia trimestral el primer año y bimensual a partir de entonces. La media de gastos anuales de las limpiezas especializadas asciende a 4.000 €/año, no habiendo requerido obras complementarias hasta el momento.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE228,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Nuclear Central of Ascó,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Asco/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,6000,,,7439.107792,11112.8043,6000,7439.107792,11112.8043,EUR,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 30. La central nuclear de Ascó. Los costes de las actuaciones motivadas por el mejillón cebra se remontan al año 2001, con los inherentes a la inspección de los sistemas (6.000 €). ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE229,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Nuclear Central of Ascó,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Asco/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,128628,,,165744.1145,236132.7574,128628,165744.1145,236132.7574,EUR,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Pg 30. La central nuclear de Ascó. En el año 2002 siguieron las inspecciones, iniciándose los estudios de ingeniería sobre impacto y medidas correctivas, basados en experiencias en USA y Canadá con evaluación de la energía perdida por tratamientos térmicos contra mejillón cebra (128.628 €). ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE230,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Nuclear Central of Ascó,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Asco/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,197830,,,298177.5104,346797.9597,197830,298177.5104,346797.9597,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Damage repair/Monitoring/Research,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 30. La central nuclear de Ascó. De 2003 a 2005 y con visos de permanencia, continúan las actuaciones de inspección, estudio de desarrollo larvario del mejillón, medidas correctivas valorándose la pérdida de energía, con resultados de 197.830 €, 226.930 € y 117.250 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE231,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Nuclear Central of Ascó,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Asco/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,226930,,,366321.6284,384158.873,226930,366321.6284,384158.873,EUR,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Damage repair/Monitoring/Research,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 30. La central nuclear de Ascó. De 2003 a 2005 y con visos de permanencia, continúan las actuaciones de inspección, estudio de desarrollo larvario del mejillón, medidas correctivas valorándose la pérdida de energía, con resultados de 197.830 €, 226.930 € y 117.250 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE232,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Nuclear Central of Ascó,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Asco/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,117250,,,183087.6471,191246.7264,117250,183087.6471,191246.7264,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Damage repair/Monitoring/Research,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,1647/NE232/NE233/NE237,no,"Pg 30. La central nuclear de Ascó. De 2003 a 2005 y con visos de permanencia, continúan las actuaciones de inspección, estudio de desarrollo larvario del mejillón, medidas correctivas valorándose la pérdida de energía, con resultados de 197.830 €, 226.930 € y 117.250 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE234,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Hidroelectric enterprise,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ribarroja hidroelectric central power/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,360612,,,464668.0087,662004.4306,360612,464668.0087,662004.4306,EUR,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair/Research,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 30. Los principales costes por actuaciones de protección contra el mejillón cebra hasta el día de hoy se centran en la central hidroeléctrica de Ribarroja, y afectan principalmente a la sustitución de las rejas de las tomas de los cuatro grupos hidroeléctricos de 2002 a 2005, con un coste medio 247.537,25 €/año. Además de labores de limpieza de las rejas, decantadores, filtros y tratamientos químicos durante los cuatro años, se han desarrollado otras actividades de diversa índole: Convenios de estudio e investigación con las Universidades de Lleida y Zaragoza, recopilación de información sobre el mejillón cebra y edición de monografías, trabajos en el embalse y en el laboratorio de seguimiento de la expansión del mejillón etc. Estos gastos se reparten uniformemente durante todo el periodo. En consecuencia se obtienen unos costes totales del periodo 2002-2005 equivalentes a 360.611,88 €, 321.170,88 €, 317.849,88 € y 296.531,88 €, lo que supone un total de 1.296.165 € desde el inicio hasta el año 2005. No se ha valorado la pérdida de energía por disminución superficie útil de las rejas de toma, y existen probabilidades de próximas actuaciones preventivas en las centrales de Flix y Mequinenza.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE235,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Hidroelectric enterprise,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ribarroja hidroelectric central power/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,321171,,,484082.1371,563015.9608,321171,484082.1371,563015.9608,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair/Research,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 30. Los principales costes por actuaciones de protección contra el mejillón cebra hasta el día de hoy se centran en la central hidroeléctrica de Ribarroja, y afectan principalmente a la sustitución de las rejas de las tomas de los cuatro grupos hidroeléctricos de 2002 a 2005, con un coste medio 247.537,25 €/año. Además de labores de limpieza de las rejas, decantadores, filtros y tratamientos químicos durante los cuatro años, se han desarrollado otras actividades de diversa índole: Convenios de estudio e investigación con las Universidades de Lleida y Zaragoza, recopilación de información sobre el mejillón cebra y edición de monografías, trabajos en el embalse y en el laboratorio de seguimiento de la expansión del mejillón etc. Estos gastos se reparten uniformemente durante todo el periodo. En consecuencia se obtienen unos costes totales del periodo 2002-2005 equivalentes a 360.611,88 €, 321.170,88 €, 317.849,88 € y 296.531,88 €, lo que supone un total de 1.296.165 € desde el inicio hasta el año 2005. No se ha valorado la pérdida de energía por disminución superficie útil de las rejas de toma, y existen probabilidades de próximas actuaciones preventivas en las centrales de Flix y Mequinenza.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE236,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Hidroelectric enterprise,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ribarroja hidroelectric central power/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,317850,,,513089.1887,538072.9643,317850,513089.1887,538072.9643,EUR,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair/Research,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Pg 30. Los principales costes por actuaciones de protección contra el mejillón cebra hasta el día de hoy se centran en la central hidroeléctrica de Ribarroja, y afectan principalmente a la sustitución de las rejas de las tomas de los cuatro grupos hidroeléctricos de 2002 a 2005, con un coste medio 247.537,25 €/año. Además de labores de limpieza de las rejas, decantadores, filtros y tratamientos químicos durante los cuatro años, se han desarrollado otras actividades de diversa índole: Convenios de estudio e investigación con las Universidades de Lleida y Zaragoza, recopilación de información sobre el mejillón cebra y edición de monografías, trabajos en el embalse y en el laboratorio de seguimiento de la expansión del mejillón etc. Estos gastos se reparten uniformemente durante todo el periodo. En consecuencia se obtienen unos costes totales del periodo 2002-2005 equivalentes a 360.611,88 €, 321.170,88 €, 317.849,88 € y 296.531,88 €, lo que supone un total de 1.296.165 € desde el inicio hasta el año 2005. No se ha valorado la pérdida de energía por disminución superficie útil de las rejas de toma, y existen probabilidades de próximas actuaciones preventivas en las centrales de Flix y Mequinenza.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE237,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Hidroelectric enterprise,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ribarroja hidroelectric central power/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,296532,,,463039.1999,483673.9811,296532,463039.1999,483673.9811,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage repair/Research,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,1647/NE232/NE233/NE237,no,"Pg 30. Los principales costes por actuaciones de protección contra el mejillón cebra hasta el día de hoy se centran en la central hidroeléctrica de Ribarroja, y afectan principalmente a la sustitución de las rejas de las tomas de los cuatro grupos hidroeléctricos de 2002 a 2005, con un coste medio 247.537,25 €/año. Además de labores de limpieza de las rejas, decantadores, filtros y tratamientos químicos durante los cuatro años, se han desarrollado otras actividades de diversa índole: Convenios de estudio e investigación con las Universidades de Lleida y Zaragoza, recopilación de información sobre el mejillón cebra y edición de monografías, trabajos en el embalse y en el laboratorio de seguimiento de la expansión del mejillón etc. Estos gastos se reparten uniformemente durante todo el periodo. En consecuencia se obtienen unos costes totales del periodo 2002-2005 equivalentes a 360.611,88 €, 321.170,88 €, 317.849,88 € y 296.531,88 €, lo que supone un total de 1.296.165 € desde el inicio hasta el año 2005. No se ha valorado la pérdida de energía por disminución superficie útil de las rejas de toma, y existen probabilidades de próximas actuaciones preventivas en las centrales de Flix y Mequinenza.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE238,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Washing and disinfection station. ,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Fayon/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,15491,,,23348.67216,27155.87724,15491,23348.67216,27155.87724,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 32. En 2003, la construcción de la obra civil de la estación de lavado y desinfección de La Reixaga, en Fayón, corrió a cargo de la Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro. Los terrenos y la maquinaria corrieron a cargo del Ayuntamiento (4.348 €), y de la Sociedad Deportiva de Pescadores Fayonense “La Reixaga” (11.143 €) que, a su vez, corre con los gastos de explotación y mantenimiento de la citada estación por un importe anual de 600 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE239,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Washing and disinfection station. ,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Fayon/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),Annual,Year,2003,2005,2003,2005,Potentially ongoing,600,,,936.9090686,978.6612866,600,936.9090686,978.6612866,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 32. En 2003, la construcción de la obra civil de la estación de lavado y desinfección de La Reixaga, en Fayón (…) y mantenimiento de la citada estación por un importe anual de 600 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE240,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Fontoba Nautic club,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Caspe/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,4000,,,6028.964472,7012.039827,4000,6028.964472,7012.039827,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 32. En 2003, la inversión en la estación de lavado y desinfección de Náutica Fontoba, en Caspe, supuso un montante de 4.000 €, sin cooperación de Organismos Oficiales. ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE241,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Fontoba Nautic club,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Caspe/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),Annual,Year,2003,2005,2003,2005,Potentially ongoing,1500,,,2342.272671,2446.653217,1500,2342.272671,2446.653217,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 32. En 2003, la inversión en la estación de lavado y desinfección de Náutica Fontoba, en Caspe (…). Los gastos de explotación y mantenimiento a partir de ese año, se pueden establecer en una media de 1.500 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE242,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Camping,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Camping Lake Caspe/ Embalse de Mequinenza/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (Dam),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,38000,,,57275.16249,66614.37836,38000,57275.16249,66614.37836,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 31-32. en 2003, en el Camping Lake Caspe se limitó el acceso al embalse de Mequinenza mediante control de acceso por instalación de barrera deslizante (8.000 €), arreglándose el acceso al embalse (30.000 €). ",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE243,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Camping,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Camping Lake Caspe/ Embalse de Mequinenza/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (Dam),Annual,Year,2003,2005,2003,2005,Potentially ongoing,12550,,,19597.01468,20470.33191,12550,19597.01468,20470.33191,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 31-32. en 2003, en el Camping Lake Caspe se limitó el acceso al embalse de Mequinenza(…) Desde entonces los gastos de mantenimiento del lavado y desinfección ascienden a 1.000 €/año de materiales y 11.550 €/año de personal.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE244,TC,SP_38,Estimación de los costes económicos de la invasión del mejillón cebra (Dreissena polymorpha) en la Cuenca del Ebro,Luis Pérez y Pérez- CITA Gobierno de Aragón y Universidad de Zaragoza; Carlos Chica Moreu- Consultor,NA,2006,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Automotor Center,12,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Mequinenza/ Ebro Bassin,Unit (River),Annual,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,2350,,,3542.016627,4119.573398,2350,3542.016627,4119.573398,EUR,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 33. en Automoto Center, en Mequinenza, la adecuación de las instalaciones para poder ofrecer el servicio de limpieza de vehículos y embarcaciones ascendió, en 2003, a 350 € y la maquinaria específica de desinfección fue facilitada por la Sociedad de Pesca “El Siluro”, 2.000 €.",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE245,TC,SP_39,Plan de erradicación de la población de carpas (Cyprinus carpio) en la laguna de Zóñar (Córdoba),Carlos Fernández-Delgado,NA,2013,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,Carpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Zoñar Lake,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Andalusia,Zoñar Lake/Cordoba,Unit (Lake),38899,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,600000,,,916025.5447,990216.2658,600000,916025.5447,990216.2658,EUR,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Personnal communication by email,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE246,TC,SP_39,Plan de erradicación de la población de carpas (Cyprinus carpio) en la laguna de Zóñar (Córdoba),Carlos Fernández-Delgado,NA,2013,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,Carpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Zoñar Lake,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Andalusia,Medina Lake/ Cadiz,Unit (Lake),39022,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,600000,,,916025.5447,990216.2658,600000,916025.5447,990216.2658,EUR,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Personnal communication by email,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE282,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Catalunya,Site,2015-2018,Period,2015,2018,2015,2018,One-time,408000,,,470340.97,614755.6049,102000,117585.2425,153688.9012,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE283,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia dealbata,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River des Molins/ Calonge,Site,10.03.2018 - 15.08.2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,9999.86,,,11527.80356,15067.32839,9999.86,11527.80356,15067.32839,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE284,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia dealbata,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vall de Betlem,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5645.85,,,6508.516092,8506.906696,5645.85,6508.516092,8506.906696,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE285,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia dealbata,,Mimosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mas Donadiu,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,500,,,576.3982476,753.3769668,500,576.3982476,753.3769668,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE286,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Acanthaceae,Acanthus,Acanthus mollis,,Acant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cala Pedrosa,Site,Nov.2016 - Dec.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2500,,,2826.203417,3895.080831,2500,2826.203417,3895.080831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE287,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Acanthaceae,Acanthus,Acanthus mollis,,Acant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cala Pedrosa,Site,Nov.2017 - Dec. 2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1250,,,1412.101471,1949.378538,1250,1412.101471,1949.378538,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE288,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Acanthaceae,Acanthus,Acanthus mollis,,Acant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cala Pedrosa,Site,Jan.2018 - Dec.2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3118,,,3594.419472,4698.058765,3118,3594.419472,4698.058765,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE289,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Mosquit tigre,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,15000,,,17211.63487,23342.87087,15000,17211.63487,23342.87087,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE290,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Mosquit tigre,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15000,,,16957.2205,23370.48498,15000,16957.2205,23370.48498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE291,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Mosquit tigre,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,15000,,,16945.21765,23392.54246,15000,16945.21765,23392.54246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE292,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Mosquit tigre,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,15000,,,17291.94743,22601.309,15000,17291.94743,22601.309,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE293,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Mosquit tigre,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,6250,,,7171.514529,9726.196194,6250,7171.514529,9726.196194,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE294,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Mosquit tigre,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,6250,,,7065.508542,9737.702077,6250,7065.508542,9737.702077,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE295,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Mosquit tigre,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,6250,,,7060.507353,9746.892691,6250,7060.507353,9746.892691,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE296,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Mosquit tigre,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,6250,,,7204.978095,9417.212084,6250,7204.978095,9417.212084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE297,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Calonge - San Antoni,Site,01.05.2018 - 30.06.2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,242,,,278.9767518,364.6344519,242,278.9767518,364.6344519,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE298,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parage de Tudela/Cabo de Creus Natural Park,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1000,,,1147.442325,1556.191391,1000,1147.442325,1556.191391,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE299,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,9666.66,,,11091.93482,15043.17307,9666.66,11091.93482,15043.17307,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE300,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ulla de Portlligat/Cadaques,Site,Apr.2015 - Sept.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2000,,,2294.884649,3112.382782,2000,2294.884649,3112.382782,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE301,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Valls,Site,01.05.2018 - 25.09.2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,8538.08,,,9842.668699,12864.78562,8538.08,9842.668699,12864.78562,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE302,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mas Roger,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,430,,,493.4001996,669.1622981,430,493.4001996,669.1622981,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE303,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mas Roger,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,430,,,486.1069877,669.9539029,430,486.1069877,669.9539029,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE304,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mas Roger,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,430,,,485.7629059,670.5862171,430,485.7629059,670.5862171,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE305,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mas Roger,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,430,,,495.7024929,647.9041914,430,495.7024929,647.9041914,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE306,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ermita de la Foia,Site,2014-2015,Period,2014,2015,2014,2015,One-time,180,,,206.5396184,280.1144504,90,103.2698092,140.0572252,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE307,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Partida del Remei/ Mas de Fores/ Font Fresca i Centraleta Glorieta River Valley/Alcover,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,500,,,573.7211623,778.0956955,500,573.7211623,778.0956955,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE308,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Partida del Remei/ Mas de Fores/ Font Fresca i Centraleta Glorieta River Valley/Alcover,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,500,,,565.2406834,779.0161661,500,565.2406834,779.0161661,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE309,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Partida del Remei/ Mas de Fores/ Font Fresca i Centraleta Glorieta River Valley/Alcover,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,500,,,564.8405882,779.7514152,500,564.8405882,779.7514152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE310,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Partida del Remei/ Mas de Fores/ Font Fresca i Centraleta Glorieta River Valley/Alcover,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,500,,,576.3982476,753.3769668,500,576.3982476,753.3769668,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE311,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of la Selva/ la Selva del Camp,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1125,,,1290.872615,1750.715315,1125,1290.872615,1750.715315,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE312,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of la Selva/ la Selva del Camp,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1125,,,1271.791538,1752.786374,1125,1271.791538,1752.786374,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE313,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of la Selva/ la Selva del Camp,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1125,,,1270.891324,1754.440684,1125,1270.891324,1754.440684,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE314,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of la Selva/ la Selva del Camp,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1125,,,1296.896057,1695.098175,1125,1296.896057,1695.098175,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE315,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Siurana River (Cornudella de Montsant/ la Morera de Montsant i Poboleda),Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,10000,,,11474.42325,15561.91391,10000,11474.42325,15561.91391,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE316,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Siurana River (Cornudella de Montsant/ la Morera de Montsant i Poboleda),Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,10000,,,11304.81367,15580.32332,10000,11304.81367,15580.32332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE317,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Siurana River (Cornudella de Montsant/ la Morera de Montsant i Poboleda),Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,10000,,,11296.81176,15595.0283,10000,11296.81176,15595.0283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE318,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Siurana River (Cornudella de Montsant/ la Morera de Montsant i Poboleda),Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,10000,,,11527.96495,15067.53934,10000,11527.96495,15067.53934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE319,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Siurana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,22297.3,,,25704.24929,33596.54448,22297.3,25704.24929,33596.54448,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE320,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Brugent/La Riba,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,833,,,955.8194564,1296.307429,833,955.8194564,1296.307429,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE321,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Brugent/La Riba,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,833,,,941.6909785,1297.840933,833,941.6909785,1297.840933,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE322,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Brugent/La Riba,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,833,,,941.02442,1299.065858,833,941.02442,1299.065858,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE323,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Caramella Cliff - Roquetes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,500,,,573.7211623,778.0956955,500,573.7211623,778.0956955,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE324,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Caramella Cliff - Roquetes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,500,,,565.2406834,779.0161661,500,565.2406834,779.0161661,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE325,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Caramella Cliff - Roquetes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,500,,,564.8405882,779.7514152,500,564.8405882,779.7514152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE326,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lloret Cliff - Roquetes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1000,,,1130.481367,1558.032332,1000,1130.481367,1558.032332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE327,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lloret Cliff - Roquetes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE328,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lloret Cliff - Roquetes,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE329,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,vall del Canaletes/Horta de San Juan/Parc Natural dels Ports,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,266,,,300.7080436,414.4366004,266,300.7080436,414.4366004,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE330,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,vall del Canaletes/Horta de San Juan/Parc Natural dels Ports,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,266,,,300.4951929,414.8277529,266,300.4951929,414.8277529,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE331,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,vall del Canaletes/Horta de San Juan/Parc Natural dels Ports,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,266,,,306.6438677,400.7965463,266,306.6438677,400.7965463,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE332,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mas de Melons Natural reserve,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1000,,,1147.442325,1556.191391,1000,1147.442325,1556.191391,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE333,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mas de Melons Natural reserve,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1000,,,1130.481367,1558.032332,1000,1130.481367,1558.032332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE334,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of Celrè. Quart,Site,20.05.2015 - 15.06.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,6034.22,,,6923.919424,9390.401215,6034.22,6923.919424,9390.401215,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE335,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,9666.66,,,11091.93482,15043.17307,9666.66,11091.93482,15043.17307,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE336,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lighthouse Sarnella/Vall de Romanyac,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3021.13,,,3466.57243,4701.456497,3021.13,3466.57243,4701.456497,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE337,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Vall de Santa Creu,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1998.94,,,2259.764423,3114.41315,1998.94,2259.764423,3114.41315,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE338,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Rec Caltre i de la Vall,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1600,,,1807.489882,2495.204529,1600,1807.489882,2495.204529,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE339,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cala Montjoi,Site,2018,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1500,,,1729.194743,2260.1309,1500,1729.194743,2260.1309,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE340,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Rec de Caltre/Port de la Selva,Site,11.10.2014 - 07.22.2015,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,One-time,4444,,,5099.233691,6915.714542,4444,5099.233691,6915.714542,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE341,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Pals Beach,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,8000,,,9179.538597,12449.53113,8000,9179.538597,12449.53113,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE342,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,GI- 633 Road from Medinya to Colomes and Verges,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,35000,,,40160.48136,54466.69869,35000,40160.48136,54466.69869,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE343,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lighthouse of Sant Sebastian mountain,Site,Jan.2018-Oct.2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5179.75,,,5971.197646,7804.608687,5179.75,5971.197646,7804.608687,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE344,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lighthouse of Sant Sebastian mountain,Site,Oct.2017 - Dec.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4000,,,4518.724706,6238.011322,4000,4518.724706,6238.011322,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE345,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Celra/Els Arenys,Site,Marz 1.2015 - Oct 15.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3404.8,,,3906.811627,5298.520448,3404.8,3906.811627,5298.520448,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE346,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Salt,Site,Jun 1 . 2017 - Oct 15.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1700,,,1920.458,2651.154812,1700,1920.458,2651.154812,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE347,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ter River,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,8458,,,9750.352756,12744.12477,8458,9750.352756,12744.12477,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE348,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Fluvia River Meanders,Site,Feb. 1. 2015 - Oct. 2.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1740,,,1996.549645,2707.77302,1740,1996.549645,2707.77302,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE349,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Alta Garrotxa Protected Area,Site,Jul 25.2016 - Dec. 28.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2499.99,,,2826.192112,3895.06525,2499.99,2826.192112,3895.06525,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE350,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vall de Carrera / Oix / Hortmoier,Site,Jul 28.2016 - Nov. 29. 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1694,,,1915.035435,2639.306771,1694,1915.035435,2639.306771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE351,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Salt,Site,May 5.2016 - Oct 15.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,800,,,904.3850934,1246.425866,800,904.3850934,1246.425866,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE352,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vall de Carrera / Oix / Hortmoier,Site,May 06 2015 - Aug 11 2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,24855,,,28519.67898,38679.13702,24855,28519.67898,38679.13702,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE353,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Montagut/Tortella/Llierca River,Site,Mars 21 2017 - Jul 26.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,14259,,,16108.1239,22236.95086,14259,16108.1239,22236.95086,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE354,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Argelaguer / Montagut / Sant Jaume de Llierca / Beuda,Site,Mars 06.2018 - Aug 25. 2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,8248,,,9508.265492,12427.70644,8248,9508.265492,12427.70644,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE355,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,15639,,,17944.85051,24337.27716,15639,17944.85051,24337.27716,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE356,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15639,,,17679.5981,24366.06764,15639,17679.5981,24366.06764,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE357,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,15639,,,17667.08392,24389.06477,15639,17667.08392,24389.06477,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE358,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vall de Betlem,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,376.39,,,433.9010728,567.127113,376.39,433.9010728,567.127113,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE359,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riudecanyes,Site,Jan 01.2015 - Dec 20.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,600,,,688.4653948,933.7148346,600,688.4653948,933.7148346,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE360,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riudecanyes,Site,Jan 01.2016 - Dec 20.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,600,,,678.2888201,934.8193994,600,678.2888201,934.8193994,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE361,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riudecanyes,Site,Jan 01.2017 - Dec 20.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,600,,,677.8087059,935.7016983,600,677.8087059,935.7016983,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE362,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riudecanyes,Site,Jan 01.2018 - Dec 20.2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,600,,,691.6778971,904.0523601,600,691.6778971,904.0523601,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE363,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River,Site,Oct 21.2016 - Dec 31.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,10000,,,11304.81367,15580.32332,10000,11304.81367,15580.32332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE364,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River,Site,Jan 01.2017 - Feb 02.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,10000,,,11296.81176,15595.0283,10000,11296.81176,15595.0283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE365,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,"Francolí Road to Montblanc/
les Terres del River Gaia Road
to Santa Coloma de Queralt",Site,Sept 21.2016 - Dec 30.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,20000,,,22609.62734,31160.64665,20000,22609.62734,31160.64665,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE366,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,"Francolí Road to Montblanc/
les Terres del River Gaia Road
to Santa Coloma de Queralt",Site,Jan 01.2017 - Sept 21.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,20000,,,22593.62353,31190.05661,20000,22593.62353,31190.05661,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE367,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,Jan 25.2018 - Jan 21.2019,Year,2018,2019,2018,2019,One-time,18500,,,21326.73516,27874.94777,18500,21326.73516,27874.94777,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE368,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Selva del Campo,Site,Oct 21.2016 - Dec31.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,25000,,,28262.03417,38950.80831,25000,28262.03417,38950.80831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE369,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Selva del Campo,Site,Jan 01 - Oct 21.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,25000,,,28242.02941,38987.57076,25000,28242.02941,38987.57076,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE370,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Bogatell River/Els Garidells,Site,Jan. 25. 2018 - Jan 25.2019,Year,2018,2019,2018,2019,One-time,21500,,,24785.12465,32395.20957,21500,24785.12465,32395.20957,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE371,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of la Boella/La Canonja,Site,Jul 14.2015 - Dec 30.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,12500,,,14343.02906,19452.39239,12500,14343.02906,19452.39239,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE372,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of la Boella/La Canonja,Site,Jan 01.2016 - Apr 30.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,12500,,,14131.01708,19475.40415,12500,14131.01708,19475.40415,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE373,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamúrcia,Site,Jan 01.2016 - Dec 31.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,600,,,688.4653948,933.7148346,600,688.4653948,933.7148346,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE374,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamúrcia,Site,Jan 01.2016 - Dec 31.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,600,,,678.2888201,934.8193994,600,678.2888201,934.8193994,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE375,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamúrcia,Site,Jan 01.2017 - Dec 31.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,600,,,677.8087059,935.7016983,600,677.8087059,935.7016983,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE376,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamúrcia,Site,Jan 01.2018 - Dec 31.2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,600,,,691.6778971,904.0523601,600,691.6778971,904.0523601,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE377,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Escaladei to Morera de Montsant,Site,Sept 21.2016 - Dec 31.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15000,,,16957.2205,23370.48498,15000,16957.2205,23370.48498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE378,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Escaladei to Morera de Montsant,Site,Jan 01. 2017 - Sept 21.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,15000,,,16945.21765,23392.54246,15000,16945.21765,23392.54246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE379,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River - Vilarrodona,Site,Sept 21.2016 - Dec 31.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,17500,,,19783.42392,27265.56581,17500,19783.42392,27265.56581,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE380,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River - Vilarrodona,Site,Jan 01. 2017 - Sept 21.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,17500,,,19769.42059,27291.29953,17500,19769.42059,27291.29953,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE381,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia river - Aiguamurcia i St.Creus,Site,Jul 14. 2015 - Dec 31.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,22500,,,25817.4523,35014.3063,22500,25817.4523,35014.3063,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE382,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia river - Aiguamurcia i St.Creus,Site,Jan 01 - Apr 30. 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,22500,,,25435.83075,35055.72748,22500,25435.83075,35055.72748,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE383,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of Sant Miquel/Santa Oliva,Site,Jul 14. 2015 - Dec 31.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,22500,,,25817.4523,35014.3063,22500,25817.4523,35014.3063,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE384,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River of Sant Miquel/Santa Oliva,Site,Jan 01 - Apr 30. 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,22500,,,25435.83075,35055.72748,22500,25435.83075,35055.72748,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE385,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Montsant,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,477,,,547.3299888,742.3032935,477,547.3299888,742.3032935,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE386,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Montsant,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,477,,,539.239612,743.1814225,477,539.239612,743.1814225,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE387,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Montsant,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,477,,,538.8579212,743.8828501,477,538.8579212,743.8828501,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE388,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Montsant,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,477,,,549.8839282,718.7216263,477,549.8839282,718.7216263,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE389,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riveret d'Escaladei,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,4500,,,5163.490461,7002.86126,4500,5163.490461,7002.86126,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE390,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riveret d'Escaladei,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,4500,,,5087.166151,7011.145495,4500,5087.166151,7011.145495,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE391,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riveret d'Escaladei,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,4500,,,5083.565294,7017.762737,4500,5083.565294,7017.762737,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE392,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riveret d'Escaladei,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,4500,,,5187.584228,6780.392701,4500,5187.584228,6780.392701,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE393,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Santa Coloma de Queralt i Montferri,Site,Jun 30.2016 - Dec 31.2017,Period,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,475,,,536.5985588,740.7638445,475,536.5985588,740.7638445,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE394,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River,Site,Jul 14 2015 - Dec 31 2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,22500,,,25817.4523,35014.3063,22500,25817.4523,35014.3063,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE395,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River,Site,Jan 01 -2016 - Apr 30.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,22500,,,25435.83075,35055.72748,22500,25435.83075,35055.72748,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE396,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River,Site,Jan 25.2018 - Jan 25. 2019,Year,2018,2019,2018,2019,One-time,17500,,,20173.93867,26368.19384,17500,20173.93867,26368.19384,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE397,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River,Site,Oct 21.2016 - Dec 31.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,10000,,,11304.81367,15580.32332,10000,11304.81367,15580.32332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE398,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gaia River,Site,Jan 01.2017 - Feb. 21.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,10000,,,11296.81176,15595.0283,10000,11296.81176,15595.0283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE399,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vilella Alta i Vilella Baixa,Site,Jan 25. 2018 - Jan 25.2019,Year,2018,2019,2018,2019,One-time,12500,,,14409.95619,18834.42417,12500,14409.95619,18834.42417,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE400,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Secà de Balaguer,Site,Sep -Oct 2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1500,,,1729.194743,2260.1309,1500,1729.194743,2260.1309,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE401,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Canya,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE402,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Erinaceomorpha,Erinaceidae,Atelerix,Atelerix albiventris,,Ericó africà,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Catalunya Autonomous Region,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1512.5,,,1709.853067,2356.523903,1512.5,1709.853067,2356.523903,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE403,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Fungi,Chytridiomycota,Chytridiomycetes,Rhizophydiales,Insertae sedis,Batrachochytrium,Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis,,Quitridi ,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Can Falguera River/Camprodon,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,700,,,790.7768235,1091.651981,700,790.7768235,1091.651981,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE404,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Fungi,Chytridiomycota,Chytridiomycetes,Rhizophydiales,Insertae sedis,Batrachochytrium,Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis,,Quitridi ,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Montpol/Lladurs,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE405,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Fungi,Chytridiomycota,Chytridiomycetes,Rhizophydiales,Insertae sedis,Batrachochytrium,Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis,,Quitridi ,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,"Sant Bartomeu
del Grau",Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE406,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Fungi,Chytridiomycota,Chytridiomycetes,Rhizophydiales,Insertae sedis,Batrachochytrium,Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis,,Quitridi ,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Roca del Valles,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE407,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Portunidae,Callinectes,Callinectes sapidus,,Cranc blau,Aquatic/Terrestrial,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro Delta,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,18000,,,20750.33691,27121.5708,18000,20750.33691,27121.5708,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE408,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Salou Beach,Site,May 27.2017 - Sept 16.2018,Period,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2000,,,2259.362353,3119.005661,2000,2259.362353,3119.005661,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE409,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cadaques - El Port de la Selva,Site,Feb 1.2015 - Apr 30.2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4500,,,5163.490461,7002.86126,4500,5163.490461,7002.86126,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE410,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,9666.66,,,11091.93482,15043.17307,9666.66,11091.93482,15043.17307,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE411,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE412,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Club Med-PNCCR,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,20000,,,22593.62353,31190.05661,20000,22593.62353,31190.05661,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE413,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parage de Tudela/Cabo de Creus Natural Park,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4500,,,5163.490461,7002.86126,4500,5163.490461,7002.86126,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE414,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parage de Tudela/Cabo de Creus Natural Park,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15000,,,16957.2205,23370.48498,15000,16957.2205,23370.48498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE415,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parage de Tudela/Cabo de Creus Natural Park,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,9000,,,10167.13059,14035.52547,9000,10167.13059,14035.52547,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE416,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parage de Tudela/Cabo de Creus Natural Park,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,10000,,,11527.96495,15067.53934,10000,11527.96495,15067.53934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE417,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ulla de Portlligat/Cadaques,Site,Spring - September,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2000,,,2294.884649,3112.382782,2000,2294.884649,3112.382782,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE418,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Cloïsa de riu asiàtica,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Aug 08.2016 - Dec 31.2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,16620.18,,,18788.8038,25894.77781,16620.18,18788.8038,25894.77781,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE419,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Cloïsa de riu asiàtica,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01 2017 - Dec 31.2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,9322.75,,,10531.73519,14538.85501,9322.75,10531.73519,14538.85501,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE420,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Cloïsa de riu asiàtica,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01. 2018 - May 31.2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,26374.54,,,30404.47727,39739.94189,26374.54,30404.47727,39739.94189,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE421,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Castellon de Espurias/San Pedro Pescador/Rosas,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2085,,,2355.385253,3251.563402,2085,2355.385253,3251.563402,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE422,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Castellon de Espurias/San Pedro Pescador/Rosas,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2085,,,2403.580692,3141.581951,2085,2403.580692,3141.581951,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE423,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tordera River and Lake,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,7481.55,,,8624.704618,11272.85489,7481.55,8624.704618,11272.85489,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE424,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River des Molins/ Calonge,Site,Mar 10.2016 - Jun 20. 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4500,,,5087.166151,7011.145495,4500,5087.166151,7011.145495,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE425,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Escala,Site,12/12/2017 - 31/12/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,740,,,835.9640706,1154.032095,740,835.9640706,1154.032095,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE426,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Escala,Site,1/1/2018 - 3/3/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,740,,,853.0694064,1114.997911,740,853.0694064,1114.997911,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE427,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,vall del Canaletes/ la Bellida/Horta de San Juan,Site,3/01/2016 - 31/12/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,150,,,169.572205,233.7048498,150,169.572205,233.7048498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE428,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,vall del Canaletes/ la Bellida/Horta de San Juan,Site,1/01/2017 - 31/12/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,150,,,169.4521765,233.9254246,150,169.4521765,233.9254246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE429,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,vall del Canaletes/ la Bellida/Horta de San Juan,Site,1/1/2018 - 8/1/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,150,,,172.9194743,226.01309,150,172.9194743,226.01309,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE430,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Calonge - San Antoni,Site,01/05/2018 - 30/06/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,242,,,278.9767518,364.6344519,242,278.9767518,364.6344519,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE431,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE432,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cabo de Reus Natural Park,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,441.27,,,498.4944127,688.161814,441.27,498.4944127,688.161814,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE433,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,Clavellina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Maresme/Argentona/Mataro/Cabrils/ Vilasar de Dalt/Alella,Site,Jan 10/2017 - Feb 1/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3651.23,,,4124.725802,5694.10352,3651.23,4124.725802,5694.10352,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE437,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,Carpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 1/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4247.1,,,4873.302297,6609.300457,4247.1,4873.302297,6609.300457,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE438,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,Carpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 1/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4247.1,,,4801.267413,6617.119118,4247.1,4801.267413,6617.119118,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE439,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,Carpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 1/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4247.1,,,4797.868925,6623.364471,4247.1,4797.868925,6623.364471,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE440,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,Carpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ivars Lake - Vila-sana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,6251,,,7172.661971,9727.752385,6251,7172.661971,9727.752385,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE441,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,Carpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Roquetes - Vall Pond/Parc Natural dels Ports,Site,Jan 3/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,450,,,516.3490461,700.286126,450,516.3490461,700.286126,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE442,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,Carpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Horta de San Juan/Parc Natural dels Ports,Site,Jan 3/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,900,,,1032.698092,1400.572252,900,1032.698092,1400.572252,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE443,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Musclo zebrat,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Catalunya,Site,Jan 1/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,15000,,,17211.63487,23342.87087,15000,17211.63487,23342.87087,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE444,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Musclo zebrat,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Catalunya,Site,Jan 1/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15000,,,16957.2205,23370.48498,15000,16957.2205,23370.48498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE445,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Musclo zebrat,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Catalunya,Site,Jan 1/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,15000,,,16945.21765,23392.54246,15000,16945.21765,23392.54246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE446,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Musclo zebrat,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Catalunya,Site,Jan 1/2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,15000,,,17291.94743,22601.309,15000,17291.94743,22601.309,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE447,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Musclo zebrat,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 1/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,14603,,,16508.4194,22751.94615,14603,16508.4194,22751.94615,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE448,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Musclo zebrat,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 1/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,14603,,,16496.73422,22773.41983,14603,16496.73422,22773.41983,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE449,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Musclo zebrat,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 1/2018- Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,21703,,,25019.14233,32701.08062,21703,25019.14233,32701.08062,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE450,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Fundulidae,Fundulus,Fundulus heteroclitus,,Fúndul,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Delta de l'Ebre Natural Park,Site,Jan 1/2015- Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3728,,,4277.664986,5801.481506,3728,4277.664986,5801.481506,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE451,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Fundulidae,Fundulus,Fundulus heteroclitus,,Fúndul,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Delta de l'Ebre Natural Park,Site,Jan 1/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3728,,,4214.434535,5808.344535,3728,4214.434535,5808.344535,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE452,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Fundulidae,Fundulus,Fundulus heteroclitus,,Fúndul,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Delta de l'Ebre Natural Park,Site,Jan 1/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3728,,,4211.451426,5813.826552,3728,4211.451426,5813.826552,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE453,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Fundulidae,Fundulus,Fundulus heteroclitus,,Fúndul,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Delta de l'Ebre Natural Park,Site,Jan 1/2018- Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3728,,,4297.625334,5617.178664,3728,4297.625334,5617.178664,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE454,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,Gambusia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Francesc Macia Avenue Pond - Parets del Valles,Site,Jul 10/2018 - Jul 18/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,955,,,1100.920653,1438.950007,955,1100.920653,1438.950007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE455,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,Gambusia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ter River,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2061,,,2375.913577,3105.419857,2061,2375.913577,3105.419857,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE456,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,Gambusia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Molinot,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2178,,,2460.445602,3396.597165,2178,2460.445602,3396.597165,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE457,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Stylommatophora,Helicidae,Helix,Helix lucorum,,Cargol turc,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Baga/Bastareny River/Guardiola/Parc Natural del Cadí-Moixeró,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,150,,,172.1163487,233.4287087,150,172.1163487,233.4287087,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE458,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Stylommatophora,Helicidae,Helix,Helix lucorum,,Cargol turc,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Baga/Bastareny River/Guardiola/Parc Natural del Cadí-Moixeró,Site,2016,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,One-time,150,,,169.572205,233.7048498,150,169.572205,233.7048498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE459,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Pampa del Caucas,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Segre River/Cerdanya,Site,Spring 2016 - september 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,10000,,,11304.81367,15580.32332,10000,11304.81367,15580.32332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE460,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Eudocotids,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Pampa del Caucas,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5984.35,,,6898.737706,9016.942902,5984.35,6898.737706,9016.942902,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE461,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,Peix sol,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River. Santa Maria de Merlès,Site,Mar 01/2015 - Nov 15/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4000,,,4589.769298,6224.765564,4000,4589.769298,6224.765564,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE462,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,Peix sol,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River. Santa Maria de Merlès,Site,Mar 01/2016 - Nov 15/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE463,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,Peix sol,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River. Santa Maria de Merlès,Site,Mar 01/2017 - Nov 15/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE464,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,Peix sol,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River. Santa Maria de Merlès,Site,Mar 01/2018 - Oct 30/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3000,,,3458.389485,4520.261801,3000,3458.389485,4520.261801,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE465,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,Peix sol,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4247.1,,,4873.302297,6609.300457,4247.1,4873.302297,6609.300457,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE466,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,Peix sol,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4247.1,,,4801.267413,6617.119118,4247.1,4801.267413,6617.119118,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE467,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,Peix sol,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4247.1,,,4797.868925,6623.364471,4247.1,4797.868925,6623.364471,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE468,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Dispsacales,Caprifoliaceae,Lonicera,Lonicera japonica,,Lligabosc del Japó,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,Feb 1/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE469,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Perca americana,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Montsant/Margalef/Parc Natural de Montsant,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,333,,,382.0982941,518.2117332,333,382.0982941,518.2117332,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE470,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Perca americana,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Molinot,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2179,,,2461.575284,3398.156668,2179,2461.575284,3398.156668,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE471,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Perca americana,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4247.1,,,4873.302297,6609.300457,4247.1,4873.302297,6609.300457,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE472,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Perca americana,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4247.1,,,4801.267413,6617.119118,4247.1,4801.267413,6617.119118,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE473,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Perca americana,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4247.1,,,4797.868925,6623.364471,4247.1,4797.868925,6623.364471,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE474,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,350,,,395.3884118,545.8259907,350,395.3884118,545.8259907,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE475,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,350,,,403.4787733,527.3638767,350,403.4787733,527.3638767,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE476,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Segria,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,532,,,610.4393167,827.89382,532,610.4393167,827.89382,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE477,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Segria,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,532,,,601.4160871,828.8732008,532,601.4160871,828.8732008,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE478,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Segria,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,532,,,600.9903859,829.6555058,532,600.9903859,829.6555058,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE479,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Segria,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,532,,,613.2877354,801.5930926,532,613.2877354,801.5930926,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE480,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barbera del Valles,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2400,,,2766.711588,3616.20944,2400,2766.711588,3616.20944,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE481,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona city,Site,Jun 25/2017 - July 25/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,54000,,,61002.78353,84213.15285,54000,61002.78353,84213.15285,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE482,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona city,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1928,,,2222.591643,2905.021584,1928,2222.591643,2905.021584,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE483,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cornella de llobregat,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2400,,,2713.15528,3739.277597,2400,2713.15528,3739.277597,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE484,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Prat de Llobregat,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3300,,,3786.559671,5135.43159,3300,3786.559671,5135.43159,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE485,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Prat de Llobregat,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3300,,,3730.58851,5141.506697,3300,3730.58851,5141.506697,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE486,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona beach,Site,Jun 6/2018 - July 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1325,,,1527.455356,1996.448962,1325,1527.455356,1996.448962,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE487,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gava,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,900,,,1016.713059,1403.552547,900,1016.713059,1403.552547,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE488,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Gava,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1100,,,1268.076145,1657.429327,1100,1268.076145,1657.429327,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE489,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mataro,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2800,,,3212.838509,4357.335895,2800,3212.838509,4357.335895,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE490,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mataro,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2500,,,2826.203417,3895.080831,2500,2826.203417,3895.080831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE491,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mataro,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2500,,,2824.202941,3898.757076,2500,2824.202941,3898.757076,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE492,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,San Quirico del Valles,Site,May 19/2016 - May 27/2017,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE493,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Santa Perpètua de Mogoda,Site,2015-2017,Period,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1000,,,1147.442325,1556.191391,1000,1147.442325,1556.191391,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE494,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Santa Perpètua de Mogoda,Site,2015-2017,Period,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2200,,,2485.298588,3430.906227,2200,2485.298588,3430.906227,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE495,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Sitges,Site,Apr 25/2017 - Apr 26/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2300,,,2598.266706,3586.85651,2300,2598.266706,3586.85651,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE496,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Terrassa (4 parcs),Site,Jul 8/2015 - Aug 9/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1800,,,2065.396184,2801.144504,1800,2065.396184,2801.144504,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE497,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Terrassa (4 parcs),Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3900,,,4495.906331,5876.340341,3900,4495.906331,5876.340341,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE498,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Torredembarra,Site,2015 - 2018,Period,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1000,,,1147.442325,1556.191391,1000,1147.442325,1556.191391,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE499,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Reus,Site,Jul 20/2017 - Jul 22/2017,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,800,,,922.2371961,1205.403147,800,922.2371961,1205.403147,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE500,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona Province,Site,Aug 17/2017 - Sept 26/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2378.32,,,2686.743336,3708.996772,2378.32,2686.743336,3708.996772,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE501,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Canovelles,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1500,,,1694.521765,2339.254246,1500,1694.521765,2339.254246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE502,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Canovelles,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1500,,,1729.194743,2260.1309,1500,1729.194743,2260.1309,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE503,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cerdanola del valles,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,6500,,,7348.128884,10127.21016,6500,7348.128884,10127.21016,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE504,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cerdanola del valles,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,6500,,,7342.927647,10136.7684,6500,7342.927647,10136.7684,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE505,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cerdanola del valles,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,6500,,,7493.177219,9793.900568,6500,7493.177219,9793.900568,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE506,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cornella de llobregat,Site,2018-2021,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,9000,,,10375.16846,13560.7854,9000,10375.16846,13560.7854,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the total period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE507,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Granolles,Site,2016-2020,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,2900,,,3278.395964,4518.293764,2900,3278.395964,4518.293764,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the four year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE508,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Granolles,Site,2016-2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,2900,,,3276.075412,4522.558208,2900,3276.075412,4522.558208,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the four year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE509,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Granolles,Site,2016-2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,2900,,,3343.109836,4369.586407,2900,3343.109836,4369.586407,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the four year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE510,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Garriga,Site,2017 - 2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,2500,,,2824.202941,3898.757076,2500,2824.202941,3898.757076,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE511,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Garriga,Site,2017 -2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,2500,,,2881.991238,3766.884834,2500,2881.991238,3766.884834,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE512,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Roca del Valles,Site,2017 -2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE513,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,La Roca del Valles,Site,2017 -2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE514,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Las Franquesas,Site,2017 -2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,1200,,,1355.617412,1871.403397,1200,1355.617412,1871.403397,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE515,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Las Franquesas,Site,2017 -2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,1200,,,1383.355794,1808.10472,1200,1383.355794,1808.10472,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE516,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Llissa de Munt,Site,2017 -2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE517,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Llissa de Munt,Site,2017 -2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE518,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Manlleu,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1147.442325,1556.191391,1000,1147.442325,1556.191391,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE519,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Manlleu,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1130.481367,1558.032332,1000,1130.481367,1558.032332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE520,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Manlleu,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE521,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Manlleu,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE522,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mollet del valles,Site,2017-2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE523,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mollet del valles,Site,2017-2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE524,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parets del Valles,Site,2017-2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE525,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parets del Valles,Site,2017-2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE526,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Torrello,Site,2014-2020,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,650,,,745.837511,1011.524404,650,745.837511,1011.524404,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the 6 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE527,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Torrello,Site,2014-2020,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,650,,,734.8128884,1012.721016,650,734.8128884,1012.721016,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the 6 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE528,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Torrello,Site,2014-2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,650,,,734.2927647,1013.67684,650,734.2927647,1013.67684,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the 6 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE529,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Torrello,Site,2014-2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,650,,,749.3177219,979.3900568,650,749.3177219,979.3900568,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the 6 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE530,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vic ,Site,2012-2020,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,1200,,,1376.93079,1867.429669,1200,1376.93079,1867.429669,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the 8 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE531,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vic ,Site,2012-2020,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,1200,,,1356.57764,1869.638799,1200,1356.57764,1869.638799,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the 8 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE532,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vic ,Site,2012-2020,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,1200,,,1355.617412,1871.403397,1200,1355.617412,1871.403397,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the 8 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE533,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vic ,Site,2012-2020,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,1200,,,1383.355794,1808.10472,1200,1383.355794,1808.10472,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the 8 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE534,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Villanueva y Geltru,Site,2018-2021,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,5500,,,6340.380723,8287.146634,5500,6340.380723,8287.146634,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE535,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyeres del Penedes,Site,2015 - 2018,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1500,,,1721.163487,2334.287087,1500,1721.163487,2334.287087,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE536,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyeres del Penedes,Site,2015 - 2018,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1500,,,1695.72205,2337.048498,1500,1695.72205,2337.048498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual cost repeated during the three year period ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE537,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Calafell,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2500,,,2868.605812,3890.478478,2500,2868.605812,3890.478478,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE538,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Calafell,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2500,,,2826.203417,3895.080831,2500,2826.203417,3895.080831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE539,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Calafell,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2500,,,2824.202941,3898.757076,2500,2824.202941,3898.757076,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE540,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Calafell,Site,Jan 01/2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2500,,,2881.991238,3766.884834,2500,2881.991238,3766.884834,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE541,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Vendrell,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2500,,,2868.605812,3890.478478,2500,2868.605812,3890.478478,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE542,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Vendrell,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2500,,,2826.203417,3895.080831,2500,2826.203417,3895.080831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE543,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Vendrell,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2500,,,2824.202941,3898.757076,2500,2824.202941,3898.757076,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE544,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Vendrell,Site,Jan 01/2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2500,,,2881.991238,3766.884834,2500,2881.991238,3766.884834,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE545,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Valls,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1850,,,2091.390529,2882.359815,1850,2091.390529,2882.359815,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE546,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Valls,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1850,,,2089.910176,2885.080236,1850,2089.910176,2885.080236,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE547,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,Cotorra argentina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Valls,Site,Jan 01/2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1850,,,2132.673516,2787.494777,1850,2132.673516,2787.494777,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE548,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Volantí de Brasil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,El Molinot,Site,May 18/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,10810,,,12211.85352,16858.2256,10810,12211.85352,16858.2256,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE549,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona mountains,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,18266.27,,,21057.29204,27522.77417,18266.27,21057.29204,27522.77417,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE550,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ivars Lake - Vila-sana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,6251,,,7172.661971,9727.752385,6251,7172.661971,9727.752385,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE551,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,Sept 01/2017 - Dec 21/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,950,,,1073.957298,1480.130716,950,1073.957298,1480.130716,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE552,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,Sept 01/2018 - Dec 21/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,950,,,1073.197118,1481.527689,950,1073.197118,1481.527689,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE553,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,Sept 01/2016 - Dec 21/2018,Period,2016,2018,2016,2018,One-time,950,,,1095.15667,1431.416237,316.6666667,365.0522235,477.1387456,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE554,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamolls de l'Emporda Natural Park,Site,Apr/2015 - May 2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1660,,,1904.754259,2583.277709,1660,1904.754259,2583.277709,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE555,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamolls de l'Emporda Natural Park,Site,March 2016 - June 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3600,,,4069.73292,5608.916396,3600,4069.73292,5608.916396,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE556,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamolls de l'Emporda Natural Park,Site,Jul 2017 - Sept 2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3600,,,4066.852235,5614.21019,3600,4066.852235,5614.21019,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE557,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riera de Romanyac/Parc Natural de Cap de Creus,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,240,,,275.3861579,373.4859338,240,275.3861579,373.4859338,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE558,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/ From Santa Maria de Merles a Borreda,Site,Jan 1/2015 - Dec 31/ 2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2500,,,2868.605812,3890.478478,2500,2868.605812,3890.478478,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE559,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/ From Santa Maria de Merles a Borreda,Site,Jan 1/2016 - Dec 31/ 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1500,,,1695.72205,2337.048498,1500,1695.72205,2337.048498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE560,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/ From Santa Maria de Merles a Borreda,Site,Jan 1/2017 - Dec 31/ 2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2500,,,2824.202941,3898.757076,2500,2824.202941,3898.757076,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE561,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Visó americà,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/ From Santa Maria de Merles a Borreda,Site,Jan 1/2018 - Dec 31/ 2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2500,,,2881.991238,3766.884834,2500,2881.991238,3766.884834,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE562,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Salmoniformes,Salmonidae,Oncorhynchus,Oncorhynchus mykiss,,Truita arc iris,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Toscar River/Alfara de Carles,Site,Mar 3/2016 - Aug 1/ 2018,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,800,,,904.3850934,1246.425866,800,904.3850934,1246.425866,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE563,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,Opuntia aurantiaca,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Puig d'en Ponç Montain/Cap de Gall,Site,Nov 2017 - Dec 2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3962.75,,,4476.644082,6179.919842,3962.75,4476.644082,6179.919842,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE564,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Figuera de moro,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ulla de Portlligat/Cadaques,Site,Spring - September,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2000,,,2294.884649,3112.382782,2000,2294.884649,3112.382782,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Original name in reference = Opuntia maxima,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE565,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Figuera de moro,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Calonge - San Antoni,Site,May 01/2018 - Jun 30/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,242,,,278.9767518,364.6344519,242,278.9767518,364.6344519,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE566,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Figuera de moro,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,San Saturnino de Osormort,Site,May 01/2018 - Oct 15/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,242,,,278.9767518,364.6344519,242,278.9767518,364.6344519,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE567,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Figuera de moro,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Dare River/Cruilles Monells y San Sadurni.,Site,May 20/2015 - Jun 15/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4253.15,,,4880.244323,6618.715415,4253.15,4880.244323,6618.715415,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE568,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Figuera de moro,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Dare River/Cruilles Monells y San Sadurni.,Site,Dec 15/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE569,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Figuera de moro,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Dare River/Cruilles Monells y San Sadurni.,Site,Jan 01/2018 - Mar.20/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE570,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Figuera de moro,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ulla de Portlligat/Cadaques,Site,Spring - September 2015,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2000,,,2305.59299,3013.507867,2000,2305.59299,3013.507867,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE571,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Orconectes,Orconectes limosus,,Cranc de canals,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Conca de la Muga,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,5000,,,5737.211623,7780.956955,5000,5737.211623,7780.956955,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE572,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Orconectes,Orconectes limosus,,Cranc de canals,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Conca de la Muga,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,5000,,,5648.405882,7797.514152,5000,5648.405882,7797.514152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE573,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake / Parc Natural Zona Volcanica De La Garrotxa,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,12492.25,,,14122.25585,19463.3294,12492.25,14122.25585,19463.3294,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE574,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake / Parc Natural Zona Volcanica De La Garrotxa,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,12492.25,,,14112.25968,19481.69923,12492.25,14112.25968,19481.69923,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE575,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake / Parc Natural Zona Volcanica De La Garrotxa,Site,Jan 01/2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,12492.25,,,14401.02202,18822.74683,12492.25,14401.02202,18822.74683,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE576,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/From Santa Maria de Merles to Quar,Site,Mar 1/2015 - Nov 15/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4000,,,4589.769298,6224.765564,4000,4589.769298,6224.765564,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE577,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/From Santa Maria de Merles to Quar,Site,Mar 1/2016 - Nov 15/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,5000,,,5652.406834,7790.161661,5000,5652.406834,7790.161661,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE578,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/From Santa Maria de Merles to Quar,Site,Mar 1/2017 - Nov 15/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,5000,,,5648.405882,7797.514152,5000,5648.405882,7797.514152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE579,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/From Santa Maria de Merles to Quar,Site,Mar 1/2018 - Nov 15/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,6000,,,6916.778971,9040.523601,6000,6916.778971,9040.523601,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE580,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/Les Llosses/Borreda/ Santa Maria de Merles,Site,Mar 30/2017 - Sept 30/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE581,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/ From Santa Maria de Merles a Borreda,Site,Jul 2018 - Aug 1/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4000,,,4611.185981,6027.015734,4000,4611.185981,6027.015734,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE582,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/From Santa Maria de Merles to Quar,Site,Jul 2015 - Aug 1/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2000,,,2294.884649,3112.382782,2000,2294.884649,3112.382782,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE583,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/From Santa Maria de Merles to Quar,Site,Jul 2016 - Aug 1/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE584,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/From Santa Maria de Merles to Quar,Site,Jul 2017 - Aug 1/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2500,,,2824.202941,3898.757076,2500,2824.202941,3898.757076,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE585,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Cranc senyal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/From dePuig-Reig to Borredà,Site,Mar 2018- Oct 1/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2500,,,2881.991238,3766.884834,2500,2881.991238,3766.884834,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE586,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Cua de rata,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vall de Betlem,Site,Sept 1/2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,2781.91,,,3206.976098,4191.653835,2781.91,3206.976098,4191.653835,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Original name in reference= Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE587,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Percidae,Perca,Perca fluviatilis,,Perca de riu,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4247.1,,,4873.302297,6609.300457,4247.1,4873.302297,6609.300457,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE588,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Percidae,Perca,Perca fluviatilis,,Perca de riu,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4247.1,,,4801.267413,6617.119118,4247.1,4801.267413,6617.119118,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE589,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Percidae,Perca,Perca fluviatilis,,Perca de riu,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4247.1,,,4797.868925,6623.364471,4247.1,4797.868925,6623.364471,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE590,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro River/Miravet,Site,Jun  1/2017 - Nov 9/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,10000,,,11296.81176,15595.0283,10000,11296.81176,15595.0283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE591,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro River/Miravet,Site,May 21/2018 - Nov 9/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,49758.61,,,57361.55121,74973.98134,49758.61,57361.55121,74973.98134,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE592,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro River/Tortosa,Site,May 21/2015 - Nov 9/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,89741.35,,,102973.0233,139654.7163,89741.35,102973.0233,139654.7163,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE593,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro River/Tortosa,Site,Jun 1/2016 - Nov 1/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,60439.5,,,68325.72857,94166.69515,60439.5,68325.72857,94166.69515,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE594,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro River/Tortosa,Site,Jun 1/2017 - Nov 1/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,84649.67,,,95627.13879,132011.4,84649.67,95627.13879,132011.4,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE595,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro River/Tortosa,Site,May 21/2018 - Nov 9/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,117156.91,,,135058.0752,176526.635,117156.91,135058.0752,176526.635,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE596,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro Estuary,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3360.32,,,3855.773392,5229.301055,3360.32,3855.773392,5229.301055,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE597,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro Estuary,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2504.7,,,2831.516679,3902.403583,2504.7,2831.516679,3902.403583,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE598,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ebro Estuary,Site,2018,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,408.98,,,462.0170076,637.8054676,408.98,462.0170076,637.8054676,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE599,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Pals,Site,2015-2018,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,20702.55,,,23754.9821,32217.13008,20702.55,23754.9821,32217.13008,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE600,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Pals,Site,2015-2018,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,14950,,,16900.69643,23292.58337,14950,16900.69643,23292.58337,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE601,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Pals,Site,2015-2018,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,14950,,,16888.73359,23314.56732,14950,16888.73359,23314.56732,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE602,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Pals,Site,2015-2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,16900,,,19482.26077,25464.14148,16900,19482.26077,25464.14148,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE603,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Miravet Delta,Site,2015-2018,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,630213.67,,,723133.8385,980733.0878,630213.67,723133.8385,980733.0878,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE604,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Miravet Delta,Site,2015-2018,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1653771.87,,,1869558.284,2576630.044,1653771.87,1869558.284,2576630.044,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE605,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Miravet Delta,Site,2015-2018,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1185916.29,,,1339707.31,1849439.811,1185916.29,1339707.31,1849439.811,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE606,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea maculata,,Caragol poma,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Miravet Delta,Site,2015-2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1484648.17,,,1711497.207,2236999.47,1484648.17,1711497.207,2236999.47,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE607,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River. Santa Maria de Merlès,Site,Mar 01/2015 - Nov 15/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,6000,,,6884.653948,9337.148346,6000,6884.653948,9337.148346,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE608,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River. Santa Maria de Merlès,Site,Mar 01/2016 - Nov 15/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE609,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River. Santa Maria de Merlès,Site,Mar 01/2017 - Nov 15/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE610,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River. Santa Maria de Merlès,Site,Mar 01/2018 - Nov 15/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4000,,,4611.185981,6027.015734,4000,4611.185981,6027.015734,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE611,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona Province - Senglars Pond,Site,May 01-2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,400,,,461.1185981,602.7015734,400,461.1185981,602.7015734,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE612,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Glorieta/Alcover,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2500,,,2868.605812,3890.478478,2500,2868.605812,3890.478478,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE613,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Glorieta/Alcover,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2500,,,2826.203417,3895.080831,2500,2826.203417,3895.080831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE614,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Glorieta/Alcover,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2500,,,2824.202941,3898.757076,2500,2824.202941,3898.757076,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE615,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Glorieta/Alcover,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2500,,,2881.991238,3766.884834,2500,2881.991238,3766.884834,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE616,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake / Parc Natural Zona Volcanica De La Garrotxa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,12492.25,,,14122.25585,19463.3294,12492.25,14122.25585,19463.3294,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE617,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake / Parc Natural Zona Volcanica De La Garrotxa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,12492.25,,,14112.25968,19481.69923,12492.25,14112.25968,19481.69923,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE618,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake / Parc Natural Zona Volcanica De La Garrotxa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,12492.25,,,14401.02202,18822.74683,12492.25,14401.02202,18822.74683,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE619,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,600,,,678.2888201,934.8193994,600,678.2888201,934.8193994,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE620,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,600,,,677.8087059,935.7016983,600,677.8087059,935.7016983,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE621,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,600,,,691.6778971,904.0523601,600,691.6778971,904.0523601,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE622,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Montsant,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,671,,,769.9337998,1044.204423,671,769.9337998,1044.204423,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Budget from the National park ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE623,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Montsant,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1930,,,2214.563687,3003.449385,1930,2214.563687,3003.449385,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Budget from the National park and Tarragona concil,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE624,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ter River,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2061,,,2375.913577,3105.419857,2061,2375.913577,3105.419857,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE625,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Mas de Melons Natural reserve,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2000,,,2305.59299,3013.507867,2000,2305.59299,3013.507867,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE626,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Algars/Arnes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,150,,,172.1163487,233.4287087,150,172.1163487,233.4287087,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE627,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Algars/Arnes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,150,,,169.572205,233.7048498,150,169.572205,233.7048498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE628,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Algars/Arnes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,150,,,169.4521765,233.9254246,150,169.4521765,233.9254246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE629,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Algars/Arnes,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,150,,,172.9194743,226.01309,150,172.9194743,226.01309,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE630,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,"Cranc vermell, cranc de riu americà",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Francoli,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,450,,,518.7584228,678.0392701,450,518.7584228,678.0392701,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE631,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Pseudorasbora,Pseudorasbora parva,,Pseudorasbora,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parets del Valles,Site,Apr. 7/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,225,,,254.1782647,350.8881369,225,254.1782647,350.8881369,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE632,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Pseudorasbora,Pseudorasbora parva,,Pseudorasbora,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parets del Valles,Site,Jan 01/2018 - Apr 7/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,225,,,259.3792114,339.019635,225,259.3792114,339.019635,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE633,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Pseudorasbora,Pseudorasbora parva,,Pseudorasbora,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ter River,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2061,,,2375.913577,3105.419857,2061,2375.913577,3105.419857,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE634,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Dryophthoridae,Rhynchophorus,Rhynchophorus ferrugineus,,Morrut de les palmeres,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Maresme,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,7500,,,8605.817435,11671.43543,7500,8605.817435,11671.43543,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE635,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Dryophthoridae,Rhynchophorus,Rhynchophorus ferrugineus,,Morrut de les palmeres,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Maresme,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,7500,,,8478.610251,11685.24249,7500,8478.610251,11685.24249,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE636,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Dryophthoridae,Rhynchophorus,Rhynchophorus ferrugineus,,Morrut de les palmeres,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Maresme,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,7500,,,8472.608824,11696.27123,7500,8472.608824,11696.27123,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE637,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Dryophthoridae,Rhynchophorus,Rhynchophorus ferrugineus,,Morrut de les palmeres,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Maresme,Site,Jan 01/2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,7500,,,8645.973714,11300.6545,7500,8645.973714,11300.6545,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE638,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,Falsa  acàcia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Riuet d'Escaladei/Parc Natural de Montsant,Site,2014-2015,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,One-time,180,,,247.5983344,281.3795054,180,247.5983344,281.3795054,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE639,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,Falsa  acàcia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Siurana,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,571,,,655.1895674,888.5852843,571,655.1895674,888.5852843,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE640,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,Falsa  acàcia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Siurana,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,571,,,645.5048604,889.6364617,571,645.5048604,889.6364617,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE641,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,Falsa  acàcia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Siurana,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,571,,,645.0479518,890.4761162,571,645.0479518,890.4761162,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE642,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,Falsa  acàcia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Siurana,Site,Jan 01/2018 - Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,571,,,658.2467987,860.356496,571,658.2467987,860.356496,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE643,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Percidae,Sander,Sander lucioperca,,"Lucioperca, sandra",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ivars Lake - Vila-sana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,6251,,,7172.661971,9727.752385,6251,7172.661971,9727.752385,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE644,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Percidae,Sander,Sander lucioperca,,"Lucioperca, sandra",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4247.1,,,4873.302297,6609.300457,4247.1,4873.302297,6609.300457,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE645,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Percidae,Sander,Sander lucioperca,,"Lucioperca, sandra",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4247.1,,,4801.267413,6617.119118,4247.1,4801.267413,6617.119118,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE646,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Percidae,Sander,Sander lucioperca,,"Lucioperca, sandra",Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4247.1,,,4797.868925,6623.364471,4247.1,4797.868925,6623.364471,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE647,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio inaequidens,,Seneci del Cap,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,Jan 01/2015 -Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1000,,,1147.442325,1556.191391,1000,1147.442325,1556.191391,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE648,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio inaequidens,,Seneci del Cap,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,Jan 01/2015 -Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1000,,,1130.481367,1558.032332,1000,1130.481367,1558.032332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE649,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio inaequidens,,Seneci del Cap,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,Jan 01/2015 -Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1000,,,1129.681176,1559.50283,1000,1129.681176,1559.50283,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE650,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio inaequidens,,Seneci del Cap,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Tarragona Province,Site,Jan 01/2015 -Dec 31/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1000,,,1152.796495,1506.753934,1000,1152.796495,1506.753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE651,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Siluriformes,Siluridae,Silurus,Silurus glanis,,Silur,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Grauges,Site,Aug 1/2017 - Oct 30/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2000,,,2259.362353,3119.005661,2000,2259.362353,3119.005661,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE652,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Unionida,Unionidae,Sinanodonta,Sinanodonta woodiana,,Sinanodonta,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,7000,,,8032.096272,10893.33974,7000,8032.096272,10893.33974,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE653,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Unionida,Unionidae,Sinanodonta,Sinanodonta woodiana,,Sinanodonta,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona Province,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,7300,,,8376.32897,11360.19715,7300,8376.32897,11360.19715,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE654,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Audi Island Natural Reserve,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,8335.6,,,9564.620241,12971.78896,8335.6,9564.620241,12971.78896,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE655,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Albereda de la Sort/Gaia River,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,800,,,917.9538597,1244.953113,800,917.9538597,1244.953113,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE656,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ivars Lake - Vila-sana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,6251,,,7172.661971,9727.752385,6251,7172.661971,9727.752385,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE657,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2015 - Dec 31/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,7548.23,,,8661.158578,11746.49054,7548.23,8661.158578,11746.49054,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE658,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2016 - Dec 31/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,7548.23,,,8533.133367,11760.38639,7548.23,8533.133367,11760.38639,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE659,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Banyoles Lake,Site,Jan 01/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,9048.23,,,10221.61511,14110.7403,9048.23,10221.61511,14110.7403,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE660,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamolls de l'Emporda Natural Park,Site,Apr 1/2015 - Oct 2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1920,,,2203.089263,2987.887471,1920,2203.089263,2987.887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE661,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamolls de l'Emporda Natural Park,Site,Apr 1/2016 - Oct 1/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2100,,,2374.01087,3271.867898,2100,2374.01087,3271.867898,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE662,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamolls de l'Emporda Natural Park,Site,Apr 1/2017 - Oct 1/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2100,,,2372.330471,3274.955944,2100,2372.330471,3274.955944,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE663,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Fluvia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,7774.2,,,8920.44612,12098.14311,7774.2,8920.44612,12098.14311,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE664,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/ From Santa Maria de Merles a Borreda,Site,Mar 01/2017 - Nov 15/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2000,,,2259.362353,3119.005661,2000,2259.362353,3119.005661,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE665,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Merles River/ From Santa Maria de Merles a Borreda,Site,Mar 01/2018 - Oct 30/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2000,,,2305.59299,3013.507867,2000,2305.59299,3013.507867,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE666,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Aiguamolls de la Bòvila. Sant Pedor,Site,Mar 03/2016 - Apr 1/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2000,,,2260.962734,3116.064665,2000,2260.962734,3116.064665,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE667,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ca n'Oms Pond - Parets del Valles,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,450,,,518.7584228,678.0392701,450,518.7584228,678.0392701,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE668,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Francesc Macia Avenue Pond - Parets del Valles,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,955,,,1100.920653,1438.950007,955,1100.920653,1438.950007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE669,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,De la Muntanyeta Park - San Baudilio de Llobregat,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,500,,,576.3982476,753.3769668,500,576.3982476,753.3769668,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE670,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,River Llobregat,Site,May 8/2015 - Jun 8/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1500,,,1721.163487,2334.287087,1500,1721.163487,2334.287087,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE671,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parets del Valles,Site,Apr 7/2017 - Dec 31/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,225,,,254.1782647,350.8881369,225,254.1782647,350.8881369,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE672,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Parets del Valles,Site,Jan 1/2018 - Apr 7/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,225,,,259.3792114,339.019635,225,259.3792114,339.019635,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE673,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Noguera Ribagorzana River ,Site,Aug 13/2018 - Oct 18/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,500,,,576.3982476,753.3769668,500,576.3982476,753.3769668,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE674,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Montgri Natural Park/ Medes Islands/Ter Estuary,Site,April 2016 - June 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1120,,,1266.139131,1744.996212,1120,1266.139131,1744.996212,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE675,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Montgri Natural Park/ Medes Islands/Ter Estuary,Site,April 2017 - June 2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1120,,,1265.242918,1746.64317,1120,1265.242918,1746.64317,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE676,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,Apr 1/2016 - Sept 30/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,950,,,1073.957298,1480.130716,950,1073.957298,1480.130716,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE677,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,Apr 1/2017 - Sept 30/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,950,,,1073.197118,1481.527689,950,1073.197118,1481.527689,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE678,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lakes of Golf Catalunya Resort,Site,Apr 1/2018 - Sept 30/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,950,,,1095.15667,1431.416237,950,1095.15667,1431.416237,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE679,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Reguerons,Site,Apr 1/2015 - Jul 20/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,400,,,458.9769298,622.4765564,400,458.9769298,622.4765564,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE680,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Reguerons,Site,Apr 1/2016 - Jul 20/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,400,,,452.1925467,623.2129329,400,452.1925467,623.2129329,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE681,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Reguerons,Site,Apr 1/2017 - Jul 20/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,400,,,451.8724706,623.8011322,400,451.8724706,623.8011322,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE682,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Reguerons,Site,Apr 1/2018 - Jul 20/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,400,,,461.1185981,602.7015734,400,461.1185981,602.7015734,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE683,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of la Guinardera -Sant Cugat,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,300,,,345.8389485,452.0261801,300,345.8389485,452.0261801,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE684,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Can Borrell swamp,Site,Aug 15/2018 - Aug 20/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,50,,,57.63982476,75.33769668,50,57.63982476,75.33769668,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE685,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vallvidrera swamp,Site,Aug 31/2017 - Sept 10/2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,300,,,339.14441,467.4096997,300,339.14441,467.4096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE686,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vallvidrera swamp,Site,Aug 31/2016 - Sept 10/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,300,,,338.9043529,467.8508491,300,338.9043529,467.8508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE687,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Ca l'Arnus Park - Badalona,Site,May 1/2018 - May 1/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,300,,,345.8389485,452.0261801,300,345.8389485,452.0261801,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE688,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Can Viladet Park - Barcelona,Site,Jun 1/2018 - Jun 1/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,300,,,338.9043529,467.8508491,300,338.9043529,467.8508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE689,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Can Viladet Park - Barcelona,Site,Jun 1/2017 - Jun 1/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,300,,,345.8389485,452.0261801,300,345.8389485,452.0261801,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE690,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Can Zam Park - Barcelona,Site,Jul 1/2017 - Jul 1/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,50,,,56.48405882,77.97514152,50,56.48405882,77.97514152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE691,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,De la Muntanyeta Park - Barcelona ,Site,Jul 20/2015 - Jul 20/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,500,,,573.7211623,778.0956955,500,573.7211623,778.0956955,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE692,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Torreblanca Park,Site,May 1/2017 - May 1/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,50,,,56.48405882,77.97514152,50,56.48405882,77.97514152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE693,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Torreblanca Park,Site,Jun 4/2018 - Jun 4/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,300,,,345.8389485,452.0261801,300,345.8389485,452.0261801,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE694,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Turo Park,Site,Jun 6/2015 - Jun 6/2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,50,,,57.37211623,77.80956955,50,57.37211623,77.80956955,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE695,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Turo Park,Site,Jun 6/2017 - Jun 6/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,50,,,56.48405882,77.97514152,50,56.48405882,77.97514152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE696,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Anoia and Llobregat rivers confluence- Martorell,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,100,,,115.2796495,150.6753934,100,115.2796495,150.6753934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE697,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of la Guinardera -Sant Cugat,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1500,,,1721.163487,2334.287087,1500,1721.163487,2334.287087,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE698,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of la Guinardera -Sant Cugat,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1500,,,1695.72205,2337.048498,1500,1695.72205,2337.048498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE699,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of la Guinardera -Sant Cugat,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1500,,,1694.521765,2339.254246,1500,1694.521765,2339.254246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE700,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of la Guinardera -Sant Cugat,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1500,,,1729.194743,2260.1309,1500,1729.194743,2260.1309,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE701,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of les Morisques - Sant Quirico del Valles,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1700,,,1921.818324,2648.654965,1700,1921.818324,2648.654965,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE702,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Laberint d'Horta Lake - Barcelona City,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,400,,,452.1925467,623.2129329,400,452.1925467,623.2129329,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE703,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Ciudadela Park - Barcelona city,Site,2017-2018,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1700,,,1920.458,2651.154812,1700,1920.458,2651.154812,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE704,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Ciudadela Park - Barcelona city,Site,2017-2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1700,,,1959.754042,2561.481687,1700,1959.754042,2561.481687,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE705,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Muntanyeta Park - San Baudilio de Llobregat,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1100,,,1268.076145,1657.429327,1100,1268.076145,1657.429327,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE706,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of La Pegaso Park - Barcelona city,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1000,,,1130.481367,1558.032332,1000,1130.481367,1558.032332,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE707,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Arenys de Munt,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,700,,,791.3369567,1090.622633,700,791.3369567,1090.622633,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE708,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Las Pilas de Gaia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,300,,,344.2326974,466.8574173,300,344.2326974,466.8574173,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE709,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Can Rafart - Vilasar de Dalt,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,900,,,1037.516846,1356.07854,900,1037.516846,1356.07854,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE710,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Diagonal Mar Park - Barcelona city,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1700,,,1950.651952,2645.525365,1700,1950.651952,2645.525365,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE711,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Diagonal Mar Park - Barcelona city,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1700,,,1921.818324,2648.654965,1700,1921.818324,2648.654965,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE712,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Diagonal Mar Park - Barcelona city,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1700,,,1920.458,2651.154812,1700,1920.458,2651.154812,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE713,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Lake of Diagonal Mar Park - Barcelona city,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1700,,,1959.754042,2561.481687,1700,1959.754042,2561.481687,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE714,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Can Borrell swamp/Sant Cugat/Collserola Natural Park,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,500,,,565.2406834,779.0161661,500,565.2406834,779.0161661,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE715,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Llobregat/Olesa de Montserrat,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,500,,,565.2406834,779.0161661,500,565.2406834,779.0161661,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE716,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Llobregat/ Molins de Rei,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,200,,,230.559299,301.3507867,200,230.559299,301.3507867,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE717,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vallvidrera swamp/ Collserola Natural Park,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1500,,,1695.72205,2337.048498,1500,1695.72205,2337.048498,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE718,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Vallvidrera swamp/ Collserola Natural Park,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1500,,,1694.521765,2339.254246,1500,1694.521765,2339.254246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE719,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Swamp of Foix Natural Park,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3000,,,3442.326974,4668.574173,3000,3442.326974,4668.574173,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE720,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Swamp of Foix Natural Park,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3391.4441,4674.096997,3000,3391.4441,4674.096997,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE721,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Swamp of Foix Natural Park,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000,,,3389.043529,4678.508491,3000,3389.043529,4678.508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE722,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Tortuga de Florida,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Swamp of Foix Natural Park,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3000,,,3458.389485,4520.261801,3000,3458.389485,4520.261801,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE723,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Misèria,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Valls,Site,May 1/2018 - Sept 25/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,267,,,307.7966642,402.3033002,267,307.7966642,402.3033002,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE724,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Misèria,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Bagur montains,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,7819.85,,,8972.826862,12169.18325,7819.85,8972.826862,12169.18325,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE725,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Misèria,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cala Pedrosa,Site,november 2018 - December 2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1868,,,2153.423853,2814.616348,1868,2153.423853,2814.616348,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE726,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Misèria,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cala Pedrosa,Site,November 2017 - July 2018,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1250,,,1412.101471,1949.378538,1250,1412.101471,1949.378538,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE727,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Misèria,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cala Pedrosa,Site,November 2017 - July 2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1250,,,1440.995619,1883.442417,1250,1440.995619,1883.442417,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE728,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Misèria,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Cala Pedrosa,Site,November 2016 - December 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2500,,,2826.203417,3895.080831,2500,2826.203417,3895.080831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE729,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Girona,Site,Nov 9/2018 -,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,500,,,576.3982476,753.3769668,500,576.3982476,753.3769668,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE730,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Can Vilar de Tordera,Site,Aug 23/2017 - Aug 23/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,242,,,273.3828447,377.399685,242,273.3828447,377.399685,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE731,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Torribera,Site,Sept 28/2018 - Oct 26/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,181.5,,,209.2325639,273.4758389,181.5,209.2325639,273.4758389,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE732,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Celra,Site,Mar 15/2018 - Jul 5/2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3130.73,,,3609.094571,4717.239742,3130.73,3609.094571,4717.239742,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE755,TC,SP_16,Las especies exóticas invasoras en Cataluña,Sisco Mañas- Servicio de Fauna y Flora- Departament de Territori i Sostenibilitat- Generalitat de Catalunya,NA,2018,Spanish,Unpublished material,See SP_16a,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Catalonia,Barcelona Park,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,300,,,338.9043529,467.8508491,300,338.9043529,467.8508491,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE758,TC,SP_42,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Luis Lopo- Dirección General de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de La Rioja,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1190,,,1344.3206,1855.808368,1190,1344.3206,1855.808368,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,El control de la especie se realiza por medios propios. No existe contratación externa. El cálculo se ha realizado analizando las intervenciones de destrucción de nidos hechas en los últimos 3 años. Gasto total: 170 €/nido incluyendo los gastos de personal y de materiales Gasto anual: 2.100 €/año. en 2017 hicieron 7 nidos (7*170 = 1190). ,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE759,TC,SP_42,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Luis Lopo- Dirección General de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de La Rioja,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4250,,,4899.385104,6403.704217,4250,4899.385104,6403.704217,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,El control de la especie se realiza por medios propios. No existe contratación externa. El cálculo se ha realizado analizando las intervenciones de destrucción de nidos hechas en los últimos 3 años. Gasto total: 170 €/nido incluyendo los gastos de personal y de materiales Gasto anual: 2.100 €/año. En el 2018 hicieron 25 nidos que son 4250. ,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE760,TC,SP_42,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Luis Lopo- Dirección General de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de La Rioja,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,850,,,962.4356648,1257.944251,850,962.4356648,1257.944251,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,El control de la especie se realiza por medios propios. No existe contratación externa. El cálculo se ha realizado analizando las intervenciones de destrucción de nidos hechas en los últimos 3 años. Gasto total: 170 €/nido incluyendo los gastos de personal y de materiales Gasto anual: 2.100 €/año. En el 2019 hicieron 5 nidos que son 850 euros. ,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE761,TC,SP_42,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Luis Lopo- Dirección General de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de La Rioja,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,23512,,,32341.84466,36754.41629,23512,32341.84466,36754.41629,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"El control de la especie se realiza por equipos externos contratados contando con la participación también de medios propios. En el cálculo realizado no se considera este último gasto. Incluye el gasto asociado a actuaciones promovidas por el Gobierno de La Rioja, por el Ministerio de Transición Ecológica y por fondos comunitarios (proyecto Life Lutreola Spain). El cálculo se hace para los últimos 6 años. Fondos Autonómicos: 39.037 €; Fondos Miteco: 76.756 €; Fondos UE Life: 33.522 €; TOTAL: 149.315 €; Coste anual: 24.885 €/año",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE762,TC,SP_42,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Luis Lopo- Dirección General de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de La Rioja,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,34975,,,40131.7953,54427.7939,34975,40131.7953,54427.7939,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"El control de la especie se realiza por equipos externos contratados contando con la participación también de medios propios. En el cálculo realizado no se considera este último gasto. Incluye el gasto asociado a actuaciones promovidas por el Gobierno de La Rioja, por el Ministerio de Transición Ecológica y por fondos comunitarios (proyecto Life Lutreola Spain). El cálculo se hace para los últimos 6 años. Fondos Autonómicos: 39.037 €; Fondos Miteco: 76.756 €; Fondos UE Life: 33.522 €; TOTAL: 149.315 €; Coste anual: 24.885 €/año",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE763,TC,SP_42,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Luis Lopo- Dirección General de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de La Rioja,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,46649,,,52735.82528,72680.65027,46649,52735.82528,72680.65027,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"El control de la especie se realiza por equipos externos contratados contando con la participación también de medios propios. En el cálculo realizado no se considera este último gasto. Incluye el gasto asociado a actuaciones promovidas por el Gobierno de La Rioja, por el Ministerio de Transición Ecológica y por fondos comunitarios (proyecto Life Lutreola Spain). El cálculo se hace para los últimos 6 años. Fondos Autonómicos: 39.037 €; Fondos Miteco: 76.756 €; Fondos UE Life: 33.522 €; TOTAL: 149.315 €; Coste anual: 24.885 €/año",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE764,TC,SP_42,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Luis Lopo- Dirección General de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de La Rioja,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,7260,,,8201.485341,11321.99055,7260,8201.485341,11321.99055,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"El control de la especie se realiza por equipos externos contratados contando con la participación también de medios propios. En el cálculo realizado no se considera este último gasto. Incluye el gasto asociado a actuaciones promovidas por el Gobierno de La Rioja, por el Ministerio de Transición Ecológica y por fondos comunitarios (proyecto Life Lutreola Spain). El cálculo se hace para los últimos 6 años. Fondos Autonómicos: 39.037 €; Fondos Miteco: 76.756 €; Fondos UE Life: 33.522 €; TOTAL: 149.315 €; Coste anual: 24.885 €/año",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE765,TC,SP_42,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Luis Lopo- Dirección General de Biodiversidad- Gobierno de La Rioja,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,36919,,,41802.54389,54637.69859,36919,41802.54389,54637.69859,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"El control de la especie se realiza por equipos externos contratados contando con la participación también de medios propios. En el cálculo realizado no se considera este último gasto. Incluye el gasto asociado a actuaciones promovidas por el Gobierno de La Rioja, por el Ministerio de Transición Ecológica y por fondos comunitarios (proyecto Life Lutreola Spain). El cálculo se hace para los últimos 6 años. Fondos Autonómicos: 39.037 €; Fondos Miteco: 76.756 €; Fondos UE Life: 33.522 €; TOTAL: 149.315 €; Coste anual: 24.885 €/año",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE768,TC,SP_44,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Eduardo Lafuente  Sacristán- Jefa de Servicio- Area de Calidad de las Aguas. Comisaría de Aguas. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Segura River Bassin/ Murcia,Unit (River),between 2008 and 2010,Period,2008,2010,2008,2010,One-time,6000000,5000000,7000000,8941552.502,9277662.223,2000000,2980517.501,3092554.074,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm. by email from Eduardo Lafuente: ""Control de la caña a través de contratos menores que supusieron, entre 2008 y 2010, un mínimo de 5 y un máximo de 7 millones al año""",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE769,TC,SP_44,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Eduardo Lafuente  Sacristán- Jefa de Servicio- Area de Calidad de las Aguas. Comisaría de Aguas. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Segura River Bassin/ Murcia,Unit (River),2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,645000,,,743553.7394,971856.2871,645000,743553.7394,971856.2871,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm. by email from Eduardo Lafuente: ""Los datos oficiales de limpieza para los siguientes años serían los que tu has puesto antes, sólo considerando el 40% para las obras de emergencia y 60% en obras ordinarias, para el control de la caña: 2018 Obras ordinarias: 1290.000 euros",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE770,TC,SP_44,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Eduardo Lafuente  Sacristán- Jefa de Servicio- Area de Calidad de las Aguas. Comisaría de Aguas. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Segura River Bassin/ Murcia,Unit (River),2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1505026.2,,,1700199.768,2347092.619,1505026.2,1700199.768,2347092.619,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm. by email from Eduardo Lafuente: ""Los datos oficiales de limpieza para los siguientes años serían los que tu has puesto antes, sólo considerando el 40% para las obras de emergencia y 60% en obras ordinarias, para el control de la caña: 2017: Obras ordinarias: 1.679.199,82 """,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE771,TC,SP_44,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Eduardo Lafuente  Sacristán- Jefa de Servicio- Area de Calidad de las Aguas. Comisaría de Aguas. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Segura River Bassin/ Murcia,Unit (River),2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1007519.89,,,1138176.255,1571230.12,1007519.89,1138176.255,1571230.12,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm. by email from Eduardo Lafuente: ""Los datos oficiales de limpieza para los siguientes años serían los que tu has puesto antes, sólo considerando el 40% para las obras de emergencia y 60% en obras ordinarias, para el control de la caña: 2017: Obras ordinarias: 1.679.199,82 """,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE772,TC,SP_44,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Eduardo Lafuente  Sacristán- Jefa de Servicio- Area de Calidad de las Aguas. Comisaría de Aguas. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Segura River Bassin/ Murcia,Unit (River),2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,192000,,,217052.4224,299142.2078,192000,217052.4224,299142.2078,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm. by email from Eduardo Lafuente: ""Los datos oficiales de limpieza para los siguientes años serían los que tu has puesto antes, sólo considerando el 40% para las obras de emergencia y 60% en obras ordinarias, para el control de la caña: 2016: Obras emergencia 480.000,00 """,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE773,TC,SP_44,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Eduardo Lafuente  Sacristán- Jefa de Servicio- Area de Calidad de las Aguas. Comisaría de Aguas. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Segura River Bassin/ Murcia,Unit (River),2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,425895.56,,,481466.9948,663559.0527,425895.56,481466.9948,663559.0527,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pers. Comm. by email from Eduardo Lafuente: ""Los datos oficiales de limpieza para los siguientes años serían los que tu has puesto antes, sólo considerando el 40% para las obras de emergencia y 60% en obras ordinarias, para el control de la caña: 2016: Obras ordinarias: 709.825,94 """,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE780,TC,SP_46,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,David Cubero Bausela- Servicio de Espacios Naturales flora y Fauna- Consejería de Fomento y Medio Ambiente- Dirección General de Patrimonio Natural y Política Forestal- Junta de Castilla y León,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla y Leon,Castilla y León,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,15000,,,16984.15879,22199.01619,15000,16984.15879,22199.01619,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"email throughout Ana María Martínez Fernández. ""Compra de EPIs para agentes (15.000 €), cursos de formación (otros 15.000 €) y asistencia técnica para la retirada de nidos prioritarios (otros 15.000 €). Estos 45.000 € son sólo las medidas puestas en marcha el año pasado y sólo de gastos de inversión de nuestra consejería, sin valorar el coste de personal de vigilancia y notificaciones de agentes, personal técnico y administrativo de la consejería, sin contar los costes de los trampeos de agricultura y de los apicultores, sin contar los daños causados en las cosechas…",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE781,TC,SP_46,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,David Cubero Bausela- Servicio de Espacios Naturales flora y Fauna- Consejería de Fomento y Medio Ambiente- Dirección General de Patrimonio Natural y Política Forestal- Junta de Castilla y León,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla y Leon,Castilla y León,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,30000,,,33968.31758,44398.03239,30000,33968.31758,44398.03239,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"email throughout Ana María Martínez Fernández. ""Compra de EPIs para agentes (15.000 €), cursos de formación (otros 15.000 €) y asistencia técnica para la retirada de nidos prioritarios (otros 15.000 €). Estos 45.000 € son sólo las medidas puestas en marcha el año pasado y sólo de gastos de inversión de nuestra consejería, sin valorar el coste de personal de vigilancia y notificaciones de agentes, personal técnico y administrativo de la consejería, sin contar los costes de los trampeos de agricultura y de los apicultores, sin contar los daños causados en las cosechas…",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE783,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Albacete Province,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,32800,,,45117.91872,51273.59877,32800,45117.91872,51273.59877,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actuaciones de control de la especie exótica invasora Cylindropuntia rosea .,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE786,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,cangrejo señal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Albacete Province,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,10802,,,14858.65116,16885.89677,10802,14858.65116,16885.89677,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ERRADICACION CANGREJO SEÑAL ALBACETE,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE792,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Guadalajara Province,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,14450,,,19876.64407,22588.52141,14450,19876.64407,22588.52141,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ERRADICACION MAPACHE EN GUADALAJARA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE793,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Guadalajara Province,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,14500,,,19945.42139,22666.68238,14500,19945.42139,22666.68238,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ERRADICACION VISON AMERICANO EN GUADALAJARA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE794,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Toledo Province,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,43928.73,,,60426.00212,68670.24623,43928.73,60426.00212,68670.24623,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ACTUACIONES PARA LA ERRADICACION DE CYLINDROPUNTIA ROSEA EN LA PROVINCIA DE TOLEDO,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE795,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Toledo Province,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,19784.22,,,27214.11067,30927.078,19784.22,27214.11067,30927.078,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ACCIONES PARA LA ERRADICACION DE MAPACHE EN LA PROVINCIA DE TOLEDO,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE796,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Common reed,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Alboraj & Patos Lakes,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Alboraj and Patos Lakes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,24990,,,28674.58369,38889.22286,24990,28674.58369,38889.22286,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,AB-003-15 ACTUACIONES DE GESTIÓN Y CONTROL AMBIENTAL DE LA LAGUNA DE ALBORAJ Y DE LA LAGUNA DE LOS PATOS (ELIMINACIÓN DE CAÑAS (ARUNDO DONAX) Y CARRIZO (PHRAGMITES AUSTRALIS),Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE797,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,cangrejo señal,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Arquillo River/ Albacete,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,6390.38,,,7332.592482,9944.654341,6390.38,7332.592482,9944.654341,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ACTUACIONES DE CONTROL DE LAS POBLACIONES DE CANGREJO SEÑAL EN EL RIO ARQUILLO EN LA PROVINCIA DE ALBACETE,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE801,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Cuenca Province,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,19745,,,22656.2487,30726.99902,19745,22656.2487,30726.99902,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actuaciones de control de vison americano en la provincia de Cuenca,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE807,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Jarama/ Sorbe and Henares Rivers/ Guadalajara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,11979,,,13745.21161,18641.61667,11979,13745.21161,18641.61667,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ACTUACIONES DE CONTROL DE VISON AMERICANO EN LAS CUENCAS DE LOS RIOS JARAMA, SORBE Y HENARES A SU PASO POR LA PROVINCIA DE GUADALJARA",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE809,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Castilla-La Mancha,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,18968.18,,,21764.89255,29518.11842,18968.18,21764.89255,29518.11842,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Detection,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Acciones para la detección y control de las poblaciones de mapache en Castilla-La Mancha,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE811,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Cuenca Province,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,19580,,,22134.82516,30506.27307,19580,22134.82516,30506.27307,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ACTUACIONES DE CONTROL DE VISÓN AMERICANO EN LA PROVINCIA DE CUENCA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE815,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Toledo Province,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,18432.29,,,20822.61105,28745.20843,18432.29,20822.61105,28745.20843,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ACTUACIONES ERRADICACIÓN MAPACHE EN LA PROVINCIA DE TOLEDO,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE817,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Tajuña River/ Guadalajara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,20669,,,23349.38024,32233.364,20669,23349.38024,32233.364,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,CONTROL DE LA POBLACIÓN DE VISÓN AMERICANO EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO TAJUÑA EN GUADALAJARA. FASE I,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE818,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Henares River/ Guadalajara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19167.5,,,21653.16395,29891.7705,19167.5,21653.16395,29891.7705,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,CONTROL DE LA POBLACIÓN DE MAPACHE BOREAL EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO HENARES EN GUADALAJARA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE820,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Salmoniformes,Salmonidae,Oncorhynchus,Oncorhynchus mykiss,,Oncorhynchus mykiss,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Llanos/ Castilla-La Mancha,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,13249.5,,,14967.71075,20662.63275,13249.5,14967.71075,20662.63275,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,SERVICIO PARA LA IDENTIFICACIÓN DE POBLACIONES NATURALIZADAS DE TRUCHA ARCOÍRIS EN CASTILLA-LA MANCHA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE822,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Henares River/ Guadalajara,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,19426,,,22394.22472,29270.20191,19426,22394.22472,29270.20191,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,CONTROL DE LA POBLACIÓN DE MAPACHE BOREAL EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO HENARES EN GUADALAJARA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE823,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Henares & Salado Rivers/ Guadalajara,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,19371,,,22330.82091,29187.33045,19371,22330.82091,29187.33045,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,CONTROL DE LA POBLACIÓN DE VISIÓN AMERICANO EN LAS CUENCAS DEL RÍO HENARES Y SALADO EN GUADALAJARA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE825,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Castilla-La Mancha,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,3499.32,,,3962.200436,5178.76409,3499.32,3962.200436,5178.76409,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Detection,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,DETECCIÓN Y CONTROL DEL AVISPÓN ASIÁTICO EN CASTILLA-LA MANCHA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE826,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailanto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Altomira Mountains & other protected areas,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,14010.48,,,15863.7478,20734.59149,14010.48,15863.7478,20734.59149,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ELIMINACIÓN DE AILANTOS EN LA ZEC SIERRA DE ALTOMIRA Y OTROS LUGARES DE LA RED NATURA,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE827,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Toledo Province,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,16269,,,18421.01862,24077.05296,16269,18421.01862,24077.05296,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ERRADICACIÓN DEL MAPACHE EN TOLEDO,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE829,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Toledo Province,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,37149.45,,,42063.47719,54978.74948,37149.45,42063.47719,54978.74948,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ORDEN DE ENCARGO A LA EMPRESA PÚBLICA GEACAM, PARA LA ENCOMIENDA DE GESTIÓN DEL SERVICIO DE MEMORIA DE LAS ACTUACIONES DE EMERGENCIA PARA EL CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE LA PLANTA EXÓTICA INVASORA CAMALOTE (EICHHORNIA CRASSIPES) EN LA PROVINCIA DE TOLEDO",Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE831,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Tajo Bassin,Site,2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,17521.28,,,19838.94678,25930.34523,17521.28,19838.94678,25930.34523,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE LA PLANTA EXÓTICA INVASORA Eichhornia crassipes (CAMALOTE O JACINTO DE AGUA) EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO TAJO- NOV19-ABR20,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE832,TC,SP_47,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Antonio Aranda- Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Tajo Bassin,Site,2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,98584.23,,,111624.6811,145898.1946,98584.23,111624.6811,145898.1946,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,CONTROL Y ERRADICACIÓN DE LA PLANTA EXÓTICA INVASORA CAMALOTE O JACINTO DE AGUA (Eichhornia crassipes) EN LA CUENCA DEL RÍO TAJO DURANTE LAS ANUALIDADES 2020-2021-2022,Elena Angulo/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE836,TC,SP_49,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Adolfo Cordero Rivera- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Gonipterus,Gonipterus scutellatus,,defoliador del Eucalipto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Eucaliptus Forest,12b,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,Jan 1998 - Dec 1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,1000000,,,10065.40319,2077437.772,1000000,10065.40319,2077437.772,PTAS,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: ""Control biológico del defoliador del eucalipto Gonipterus scutellatus: dispersión y adaptabilidad del parasitoide Anaphes nitens en Galicia"". Entidad financiadora: Cátedra Filgueira Valverde/Univ. Vigo",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE837,TC,SP_49,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Adolfo Cordero Rivera- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Gonipterus,Gonipterus scutellatus,,defoliador del Eucalipto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Eucaliptus Forest,12b,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,Jan 1999 - Dec 1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,1000000,,,10065.40319,2077437.772,1000000,10065.40319,2077437.772,PTAS,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: ""Control biológico del gorgojo del eucalipto (Gonipterus scutellatus): efectos del clima y factores bióticos"".  Entidad financiadora: Cátedra Filgueira Valverde/Univ. Vigo",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE838,TC,SP_49,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Adolfo Cordero Rivera- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Gonipterus,Gonipterus scutellatus,,defoliador del Eucalipto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Eucaliptus Forest,12b,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,Jan 2002 - Dec 2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,750000,,,7549.052389,1558078.329,750000,7549.052389,1558078.329,PTAS,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Research project entitled:Determinación de los umbrales térmicos y tiempo fisiológico del gorgojo del eucalipto (Gonipterus scutellatus). Entidad financiadora: Cátedra Filgueira Valverde/Univ. Vigo,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE839,TC,SP_49,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Adolfo Cordero Rivera- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Cynipidae,Dryocosmus,Dryocosmus kuriphilus,,Dryocosmus kuriphilus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,01-03-2016 to 31-12-2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4311.89,,,4874.511301,6718.064033,4311.89,4874.511301,6718.064033,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: ""Asesoramento técnico sobre a efectividade de Torymus sinensis no control do Dryocosmus kuriphilus na provincia de Ourense"". Empresa financiadora: Tragsa",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE840,TC,SP_49,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Adolfo Cordero Rivera- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus globulus,,Eucalyptus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Eucaliptus Forest,12b,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,10/10/2008 to 10/09/2011,Year,2008,2011,2008,2011,One-time,94072.3,,,946.8756281,195429.3493,94072.3,946.8756281,195429.3493,PTAS,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled:"" Integración ecolóxica e impactos dos eucaliptais"", See also SP_50. Entidad Financiadora: Xunta de Galicia (08MRU024371PR)",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE842,TC,SP_50,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,María Calviño- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus globulus,,Eucalyptus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Eucaliptus Forest,12b,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,14/5/2014 to 14/05/2017,Period,2014,2017,2014,2017,One-time,97000,,,133427.9913,151632.289,24250,33356.99783,37908.07226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: ""Ecología de los eucaliptales: integración en la comunidad local y servicios ecosistémicos en relación con su gestión"". Entidad financiadora: Xunta de Galicia (Proyectos Investigadores Emergentes; EM2014/030)",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE843,TC,SP_50,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,María Calviño- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,1/3/2017-1/12/2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,50000,,,56484.05882,77975.14152,50000,56484.05882,77975.14152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: ""Convenio para el estudio del comportamiento, hábitat e impacto en los ecosistemas de Vespa velutina para la mejora de los métodos de control existentes (CO-0067-17)"". ; ADMINISTRACIÓN FINANCIADORA: Consellería de Medio Ambiente e Ordenación do Territorio",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE844,TC,SP_50,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,María Calviño- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,16/11/2017-31/12/2018,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,One-time,60000,,,67780.87059,93570.16983,60000,67780.87059,93570.16983,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: ""Convenio para la lucha contra Vespa velutina mediante la detección de nidos y puesta en marcha de la estación experimental para el estudio del avispón asiático (2017CONVDEPOAVISPÓN-BA2)"". ADMINISTRACIÓN FINANCIADORA: Diputación de Pontevedra",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE845,TC,SP_51,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,luis Navarro- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Boraginales,Boraginaceae,Echium,Echium vulgare,,Viborera,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe/South America,Spain/Chile,,Andes Chilenos (Chile)/ Orense & León (spain),Site,2008-2009,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,One-time,13342,,,22340.36916,,13342,22340.36916,,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: ""Título del proyecto: “Invasiones biológicas e interacciones planta-animal” A/9717/07 Entidad financiadora: Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional (AECI). Trabajamos en Chile y España. en este proyecto examinamos la invasibilidad de la especie (europea) echium vulgare (boraginaceae) en chile. basicamente evaluamos 1) cómo afecta la presencia de la invasora e. vulgare a la fitness de las especies de plantas nativas y 2) si están operando mecanismos de evolución rápida (de caracteres florales) en e. vulgare en su rango invasor. ste estudio lo hicimos trabajando en varias poblaciones localizadas en los andes chilenos (en las imediaciones de chillan) y con comparaciones con poblaciones de orense y leon en españa.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE846,TC,SP_51,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,luis Navarro- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Boraginales,Boraginaceae,Echium,Echium vulgare,,Viborera,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe/South America,Spain/Chile,,Andes Chilenos (Chile)/ Orense & León (spain),Site,enero 2009 - febrero 2010,Year,2009,2010,2009,2010,One-time,19273,,,30713.66148,,19273,30713.66148,,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Research project entitled: Título del proyecto: “Invasiones biológicas e interacciones planta-animal” A/017233/08. Trabajamos en Chile y España. Entidad financiadora: Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional (AECI). en este proyecto examinamos la invasibilidad de la especie (europea) echium vulgare (boraginaceae) en chile. basicamente evaluamos 1) cómo afecta la presencia de la invasora e. vulgare a la fitness de las especies de plantas nativas y 2) si están operando mecanismos de evolución rápida (de caracteres florales) en e. vulgare en su rango invasor. ste estudio lo hicimos trabajando en varias poblaciones localizadas en los andes chilenos (en las imediaciones de chillan) y con comparaciones con poblaciones de orense y leon en españa.,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE847,TC,SP_51,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,luis Navarro- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,01/01/2010 - 31/12/2011,Period,2010,2011,2010,2011,One-time,12000,,,17883.105,18555.32445,6000,8941.552502,9277.662223,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: ""Título del proyecto: “Impacto de especies invasoras y conservación de especies amenazadas”. Trabajamos en Galicia. Entidad financiadora: Universidad de Vigo (09VIB16). Con este financiación evaluamos el efecto de la introducción de gatos domesticos y asilvestrados en ecosistemas insulares. examinamos cómo la introducción de gatos, que matan aves y reptiles, afecta al proceso de dispersión de semillas de plantas productoras de frutos carnosos. eso lo evaluamos en las especies de plantas: rubus ulmifolius, tamus communis y prunus spinosa",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE848,TC,SP_51,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,luis Navarro- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Oxalidales,Oxalidaceae,Oxalis,Oxalis pes-caprae,,Agrio,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Mediterranean areas in the world,Global,01/01/2010 - 31/12/2011,Period,2010,2011,2010,2011,One-time,8000,,,11922.07,,4000,5961.035002,,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Título del proyecto: “Biología reproductiva y evolución de Oxalis pes-caprae, una especie poliploide invasora en la región Mediterránea”. PT2009-0068. Trabajamos en la península Ibérica. Entidad financiadora: MCI-Programa de Internacionalización de la I+D (Acciones Integradas) 0009111LL0023007. en realidad, este proyecto se llevo a cabo en todo el planeta (en todas las areas mediterráneas del planeta, situadas en sudafrica, australia, usa, chile y paises de la cuenca mediterránea)",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE849,TC,SP_51,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,luis Navarro- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Oxalidales,Oxalidaceae,Oxalis,Oxalis pes-caprae,,Agrio,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain/Portugal,,Spain and Portugal,Regional,02/12/2009 - 31/07/2013,Period,2009,2013,2009,2013,One-time,100207,,,159690.9602,,20041.4,31938.19204,,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Research project entitled: Título del proyecto: “Reproducción sexual y asexual como mecanismos de colonización en la especie invasora poliploide Oxalis pes-caprae”. INCITE09 310 3009 PR. Trabajamos en la península Ibérica.Entidad financiadora: INCITE-Xunta de Galicia. Carried out in Spain and Portugal,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE850,TC,SP_51,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,luis Navarro- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Oxalidales,Oxalidaceae,Oxalis,Oxalis pes-caprae,,Agrio,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,,Diverse/Unspecified,Global,noviembre de 2010 - noviembre de 2013,Period,2010,2013,2010,2013,One-time,163000,,,242912.1763,,40750,60728.04408,,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research project entitled: Título del proyecto: “Evolutionary changes to reproductive systems during the invasion process of the polyploid Oxalis pes-caprae” PTDC/BIA-BIC/110824/2009 Entidad financiadora: Fundaçao para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) en realidad, este proyecto se llevo a cabo en todo el planeta (en todas las areas mediterráneas del planeta, situadas en sudafrica, australia, usa, chile y paises de la cuenca mediterránea)",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE852,TC,SP_51,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,luis Navarro- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Oxalidales,Oxalidaceae,Oxalis,Oxalis pes-caprae,,Agrio,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain/Portugal,,Spain and Portugal,Regional,10/08/2013 -10/12/2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,4650,,,6498.179713,,4650,6498.179713,,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Research project entitled: Título del contrato: “Scientific dissemination video on ecological and evolutionary changes to reproductive systems during the invasion process of the polyploid Oxalis pes-caprae” Entidad Financiadora: Universidade de Coimbra,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE853,TC,SP_51,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,luis Navarro- Universidad de Vigo,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia,Site,07/10/2014 - 27/04/2015,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,One-time,12100,,,16644.11026,18914.95564,12100,16644.11026,18914.95564,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Resarch project entitled: Título del contrato: “Elaboración de un video de divulgación científica sobre la problemática medioambiental asociada a la introducción de especies invasoras”. Entidad Financiadora: Universidade da Coruña,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE855,TC,SP_52,"Importes anuales del COFIB destinados al control de especies invasoras, Consorcio para la Recuperación de la Fauna de las Islas Baleares, Comunitat Autònoma de les Illes Balears (CAIB)",Servicio de Protección de Especies - COFIB. Conselleria de Medi Ambient i Territori del Govern de les Illes Balears,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Zamenis,Zamenis scalaris,,Ladder snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Balearic Islands,Formentera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,23000,,,26514.31939,34655.34047,23000,26514.31939,34655.34047,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control y erradicacion ofidios,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE856,TC,SP_52,"Importes anuales del COFIB destinados al control de especies invasoras, Consorcio para la Recuperación de la Fauna de las Islas Baleares, Comunitat Autònoma de les Illes Balears (CAIB)",Servicio de Protección de Especies - COFIB. Conselleria de Medi Ambient i Territori del Govern de les Illes Balears,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Balearic Islands,Mallorca,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,35000,,,40347.87733,52736.38767,35000,40347.87733,52736.38767,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control y erradicacion avispa asiatica,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE858,TC,SP_52,"Importes anuales del COFIB destinados al control de especies invasoras, Consorcio para la Recuperación de la Fauna de las Islas Baleares, Comunitat Autònoma de les Illes Balears (CAIB)",Servicio de Protección de Especies - COFIB. Conselleria de Medi Ambient i Territori del Govern de les Illes Balears,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Balearic Islands,Islas Baleares,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,18088.29,,,20852.11732,27254.60211,18088.29,20852.11732,27254.60211,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration/Education/Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Investigación y asesoramiento ayuntamientos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE859,TC,SP_52,"Importes anuales del COFIB destinados al control de especies invasoras, Consorcio para la Recuperación de la Fauna de las Islas Baleares, Comunitat Autònoma de les Illes Balears (CAIB)",Servicio de Protección de Especies - COFIB. Conselleria de Medi Ambient i Territori del Govern de les Illes Balears,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Balearic Islands,Mallorca,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,23200,,,26744.87869,34956.69126,23200,26744.87869,34956.69126,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration/Control,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Gestion y control sp.,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE862,TC,SP_52,"Importes anuales del COFIB destinados al control de especies invasoras, Consorcio para la Recuperación de la Fauna de las Islas Baleares, Comunitat Autònoma de les Illes Balears (CAIB)",Servicio de Protección de Especies - COFIB. Conselleria de Medi Ambient i Territori del Govern de les Illes Balears,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Zamenis,Zamenis scalaris,,Ladder snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Balearic Islands,Formentera,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,32000,,,36232.87209,47357.90122,32000,36232.87209,47357.90122,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Control y erradicacion ofidios,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE866,TC,SP_52,"Importes anuales del COFIB destinados al control de especies invasoras, Consorcio para la Recuperación de la Fauna de las Islas Baleares, Comunitat Autònoma de les Illes Balears (CAIB)",Servicio de Protección de Especies - COFIB. Conselleria de Medi Ambient i Territori del Govern de les Illes Balears,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Zamenis,Zamenis scalaris,,Ladder snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Balearic Islands,Formentera,Site,2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,16000,,,18116.43604,23678.95061,16000,18116.43604,23678.95061,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control y erradicacion ofidios,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE885,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Coastal wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE886,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia karroo,,Karroothorn,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE887,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,76.8,,,105.641956,120.0552557,76.8,105.641956,120.0552557,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE888,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1536,,,2112.839121,2401.105113,1536,2112.839121,2401.105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE889,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE890,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE891,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,Heartleaf iceplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas.Species name in the document is a synonim; original name in the doc =  Aptenia cordifolia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE892,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE893,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE894,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,204.8,,,281.7118827,320.1473484,204.8,281.7118827,320.1473484,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE895,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE896,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,204.8,,,281.7118827,320.1473484,204.8,281.7118827,320.1473484,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE897,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,21120,,,29051.53791,33015.19531,21120,29051.53791,33015.19531,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE898,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1408,,,1936.769194,2201.01302,1408,1936.769194,2201.01302,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE899,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE900,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,4224,,,5810.307581,6603.039061,4224,5810.307581,6603.039061,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE901,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,204.8,,,281.7118827,320.1473484,204.8,281.7118827,320.1473484,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE902,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE903,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,460.8,,,633.8517362,720.3315339,460.8,633.8517362,720.3315339,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE905,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1536,,,2112.839121,2401.105113,1536,2112.839121,2401.105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE906,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,White leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE907,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE908,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE909,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Anacardiaceae,Schinus,Schinus terebinthifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,665.6,,,915.5636189,1040.478882,665.6,915.5636189,1040.478882,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE910,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE911,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE912,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malvales,Malvaceae,Abutilon,Abutilon theophrasti,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,172.8,,,237.6944011,270.1243252,172.8,237.6944011,270.1243252,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE913,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3072,,,4225.678241,4802.210226,3072,4225.678241,4802.210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE914,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana ",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE915,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,876.8,,,1206.078998,1370.630835,876.8,1206.078998,1370.630835,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana ",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE916,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Paiporta,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,102.4,,,140.8559414,160.0736742,102.4,140.8559414,160.0736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE917,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia saligna,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE918,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE919,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1228.8,,,1690.271296,1920.88409,1228.8,1690.271296,1920.88409,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE920,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,774.4,,,1065.223057,1210.557161,774.4,1065.223057,1210.557161,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE921,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,9227.52,,,12692.88102,14424.63897,9227.52,12692.88102,14424.63897,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE922,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,358.4,,,492.9957948,560.2578597,358.4,492.9957948,560.2578597,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE923,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Navajas,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE925,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE926,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3072,,,4225.678241,4802.210226,3072,4225.678241,4802.210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE927,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Aspe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,204.8,,,281.7118827,320.1473484,204.8,281.7118827,320.1473484,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE928,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,172.8,,,237.6944011,270.1243252,172.8,237.6944011,270.1243252,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE929,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,225.28,,,309.883071,352.1620833,225.28,309.883071,352.1620833,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE930,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Llosa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,115.2,,,158.462934,180.0828835,115.2,158.462934,180.0828835,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE931,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Llombay,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3020.8,,,4155.25027,4722.173389,3020.8,4155.25027,4722.173389,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE932,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lucena del Cid,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE933,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Navajas,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE934,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3148.8,,,4331.320197,4922.265482,3148.8,4331.320197,4922.265482,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE935,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Paterna,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,576,,,792.3146702,900.4144174,576,792.3146702,900.4144174,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE936,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ribarroja de Turia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3379.2,,,4648.246065,5282.431249,3379.2,4648.246065,5282.431249,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE937,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3699.2,,,5088.420882,5782.661481,3699.2,5088.420882,5782.661481,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE938,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,460.8,,,633.8517362,720.3315339,460.8,633.8517362,720.3315339,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE939,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Viver,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE940,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1536,,,2112.839121,2401.105113,1536,2112.839121,2401.105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE941,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Fuentes de Ayodar,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE942,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,857.6,,,1179.668509,1340.617021,857.6,1179.668509,1340.617021,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE943,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,179.2,,,246.4978974,280.1289299,179.2,246.4978974,280.1289299,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE944,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE945,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,Madeira-vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas, Original name of the species in the document = Boussingaultia cordifolia",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE946,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1196.8,,,1646.253815,1870.861067,1196.8,1646.253815,1870.861067,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE947,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,435.2,,,598.6377508,680.3131154,435.2,598.6377508,680.3131154,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE948,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,409.6,,,563.4237655,640.2946968,409.6,563.4237655,640.2946968,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE949,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1433.6,,,1971.983179,2241.031439,1433.6,1971.983179,2241.031439,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE950,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sueca,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE951,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,998.4,,,1373.345428,1560.718324,998.4,1373.345428,1560.718324,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE952,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE953,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,358.4,,,492.9957948,560.2578597,358.4,492.9957948,560.2578597,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE954,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Mogente,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,409.6,,,563.4237655,640.2946968,409.6,563.4237655,640.2946968,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE955,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1216,,,1672.664304,1900.874881,1216,1672.664304,1900.874881,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE956,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,870.4,,,1197.275502,1360.626231,870.4,1197.275502,1360.626231,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE957,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus camaldulensis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE959,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Helianthus,Helianthus tuberosus,,Jerusalem artichoke,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,435.2,,,598.6377508,680.3131154,435.2,598.6377508,680.3131154,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE960,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE961,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Paiporta,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,102.4,,,140.8559414,160.0736742,102.4,140.8559414,160.0736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE962,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1433.6,,,1971.983179,2241.031439,1433.6,1971.983179,2241.031439,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE963,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,774.4,,,1065.223057,1210.557161,774.4,1065.223057,1210.557161,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE964,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bellus,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1536,,,2112.839121,2401.105113,1536,2112.839121,2401.105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE965,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Genoves,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE966,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jativa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2560,,,3521.398534,4001.841855,2560,3521.398534,4001.841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE967,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2432,,,3345.328608,3801.749762,2432,3345.328608,3801.749762,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE968,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Monover,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE969,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE970,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE971,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Paulowniaceae,Paulownia,Paulownia tomentosa,,Princesstree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE972,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. The species name in the document is a synomym. Original name in the document =Pennisetum setaceum",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE973,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,460.8,,,633.8517362,720.3315339,460.8,633.8517362,720.3315339,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. The species name in the document is a synomym. Original name in the document =Pennisetum setaceum",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE974,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Faz,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas.The species name in the document is a synomym. Original name in the document =Pennisetum setaceum",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE975,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,569.6,,,783.5111739,890.4098128,569.6,783.5111739,890.4098128,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE976,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3020.8,,,4155.25027,4722.173389,3020.8,4155.25027,4722.173389,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE977,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,716.8,,,985.9915896,1120.515719,716.8,985.9915896,1120.515719,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE978,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Fuentes de Ayodar,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1280,,,1760.699267,2000.920928,1280,1760.699267,2000.920928,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE979,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands - river - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE980,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Salicaceae,Salix,Salix babylonica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE981,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE982,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE983,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcala de Chivert,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE984,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1280,,,1760.699267,2000.920928,1280,1760.699267,2000.920928,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE985,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave tequilana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,76.8,,,105.641956,120.0552557,76.8,105.641956,120.0552557,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE986,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcala de Chivert,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE987,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE988,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,179.2,,,246.4978974,280.1289299,179.2,246.4978974,280.1289299,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE989,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,102.4,,,140.8559414,160.0736742,102.4,140.8559414,160.0736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE990,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,768,,,1056.41956,1200.552557,768,1056.41956,1200.552557,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE991,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE992,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,179.2,,,246.4978974,280.1289299,179.2,246.4978974,280.1289299,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE993,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Drosanthemum,Drosanthemum floribundum,,Pale dewplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE996,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE997,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE998,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,332.8,,,457.7818094,520.2394412,332.8,457.7818094,520.2394412,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE999,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1000,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1001,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1002,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. The species name in the document is a synomym. Original name in the document =Pennisetum setaceum",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1003,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1177.6,,,1619.843326,1840.847253,1177.6,1619.843326,1840.847253,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1004,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,128,,,176.0699267,200.0920928,128,176.0699267,200.0920928,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1005,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,168.96,,,232.4123033,264.1215624,168.96,232.4123033,264.1215624,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1006,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,281.6,,,387.3538388,440.2026041,281.6,387.3538388,440.2026041,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1007,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1008,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1009,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1010,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2944,,,4049.608314,4602.118133,2944,4049.608314,4602.118133,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1011,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Pobla de Tornesa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1228.8,,,1690.271296,1920.88409,1228.8,1690.271296,1920.88409,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1012,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia saligna,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1013,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia saligna,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1014,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1015,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canet lo Roig,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,158.72,,,218.3267091,248.114195,158.72,218.3267091,248.114195,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1016,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,204.8,,,281.7118827,320.1473484,204.8,281.7118827,320.1473484,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1017,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1018,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,716.8,,,985.9915896,1120.515719,716.8,985.9915896,1120.515719,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1019,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,8371.2,,,11514.97321,13086.02287,8371.2,11514.97321,13086.02287,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1020,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1588.48,,,2185.02779,2483.142871,1588.48,2185.02779,2483.142871,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1021,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Belgida,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1022,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2355.2,,,3239.686651,3681.694507,2355.2,3239.686651,3681.694507,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1023,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,166.4,,,228.8909047,260.1197206,166.4,228.8909047,260.1197206,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1024,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2156.8,,,2966.778265,3371.551763,2156.8,2966.778265,3371.551763,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1025,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1026,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chiva,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,230.4,,,316.9258681,360.165767,230.4,316.9258681,360.165767,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1027,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gaianes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,288,,,396.1573351,450.2072087,288,396.1573351,450.2072087,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1028,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,524.8,,,721.8866995,820.3775803,524.8,721.8866995,820.3775803,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1029,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1612.8,,,2218.481077,2521.160369,1612.8,2218.481077,2521.160369,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1030,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villena,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,153.6,,,211.2839121,240.1105113,153.6,211.2839121,240.1105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1031,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,409.6,,,563.4237655,640.2946968,409.6,563.4237655,640.2946968,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1032,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,230.4,,,316.9258681,360.165767,230.4,316.9258681,360.165767,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1033,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,353.28,,,485.9529977,552.254176,353.28,485.9529977,552.254176,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1034,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1035,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Llauri,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1036,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,896,,,1232.489487,1400.644649,896,1232.489487,1400.644649,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1037,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2081.28,,,2862.897008,3253.497428,2081.28,2862.897008,3253.497428,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1038,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,435.2,,,598.6377508,680.3131154,435.2,598.6377508,680.3131154,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1039,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcora,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,153.6,,,211.2839121,240.1105113,153.6,211.2839121,240.1105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1040,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,230.4,,,316.9258681,360.165767,230.4,316.9258681,360.165767,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1041,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1042,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,460.8,,,633.8517362,720.3315339,460.8,633.8517362,720.3315339,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1043,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1044,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1045,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1046,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,102.4,,,140.8559414,160.0736742,102.4,140.8559414,160.0736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1047,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gatova,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1048,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3379.2,,,4648.246065,5282.431249,3379.2,4648.246065,5282.431249,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1049,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1792,,,2464.978974,2801.289299,1792,2464.978974,2801.289299,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1050,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Naquera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1051,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,172.8,,,237.6944011,270.1243252,172.8,237.6944011,270.1243252,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1052,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1053,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,57.6,,,79.23146702,90.04144174,57.6,79.23146702,90.04144174,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1054,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1280,,,1760.699267,2000.920928,1280,1760.699267,2000.920928,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1055,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,332.8,,,457.7818094,520.2394412,332.8,457.7818094,520.2394412,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1056,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Zorita del Maestrazgo,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,102.4,,,140.8559414,160.0736742,102.4,140.8559414,160.0736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1057,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1058,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1059,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1060,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1061,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,409.6,,,563.4237655,640.2946968,409.6,563.4237655,640.2946968,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1062,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1063,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,76.8,,,105.641956,120.0552557,76.8,105.641956,120.0552557,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1064,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques.Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1065,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,614.4,,,845.1356482,960.4420452,614.4,845.1356482,960.4420452,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques.  Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1066,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,358.4,,,492.9957948,560.2578597,358.4,492.9957948,560.2578597,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques.  Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1067,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,153.6,,,211.2839121,240.1105113,153.6,211.2839121,240.1105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques.  Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1068,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,972.8,,,1338.131443,1520.699905,972.8,1338.131443,1520.699905,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques.  Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1069,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Fuentes de Ayodar,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques.  Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1070,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Pobla de Tornesa,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1254.4,,,1725.485282,1960.902509,1254.4,1725.485282,1960.902509,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques.  Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1071,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2976,,,4093.625796,4652.141157,2976,4093.625796,4652.141157,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1072,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1073,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Spartium,Spartium junceum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcala de Chivert,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1074,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcala de Chivert,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,153.6,,,211.2839121,240.1105113,153.6,211.2839121,240.1105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1075,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1076,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,268.8,,,369.7468461,420.1933948,268.8,369.7468461,420.1933948,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1078,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1079,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1080,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1081,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2560,,,3521.398534,4001.841855,2560,3521.398534,4001.841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1082,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicolet,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1083,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castello de Rugat,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,358.4,,,492.9957948,560.2578597,358.4,492.9957948,560.2578597,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1084,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montichelvo,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,4285.44,,,5894.821146,6699.083266,4285.44,5894.821146,6699.083266,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1085,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Palma de Gandia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1617.92,,,2225.523874,2529.164052,1617.92,2225.523874,2529.164052,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1086,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pinet,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,51.2,,,70.42797068,80.0368371,51.2,70.42797068,80.0368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1087,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Rotova,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,102.4,,,140.8559414,160.0736742,102.4,140.8559414,160.0736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1088,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,102.4,,,140.8559414,160.0736742,102.4,140.8559414,160.0736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1089,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,960,,,1320.52445,1500.690696,960,1320.52445,1500.690696,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1090,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1091,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1092,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1093,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1254.4,,,1725.485282,1960.902509,1254.4,1725.485282,1960.902509,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1094,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1095,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,307.2,,,422.5678241,480.2210226,307.2,422.5678241,480.2210226,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1096,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,768,,,1056.41956,1200.552557,768,1056.41956,1200.552557,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1097,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,768,,,1056.41956,1200.552557,768,1056.41956,1200.552557,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1098,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,128,,,176.0699267,200.0920928,128,176.0699267,200.0920928,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1099,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San vicente del raspeig,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,419.84,,,577.5093596,656.3020642,419.84,577.5093596,656.3020642,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1100,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1101,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tibi,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,332.8,,,457.7818094,520.2394412,332.8,457.7818094,520.2394412,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1102,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Kalanchoe,Kalanchoe daigremontiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1103,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1104,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcasser,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,153.6,,,211.2839121,240.1105113,153.6,211.2839121,240.1105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1105,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1106,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,153.6,,,211.2839121,240.1105113,153.6,211.2839121,240.1105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1107,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Massamagrell,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,153.6,,,211.2839121,240.1105113,153.6,211.2839121,240.1105113,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1108,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Paterna,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,179.2,,,246.4978974,280.1289299,179.2,246.4978974,280.1289299,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1109,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Picassent,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,358.4,,,492.9957948,560.2578597,358.4,492.9957948,560.2578597,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1110,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ribarroja de Turia,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,51.2,,,70.42797068,80.0368371,51.2,70.42797068,80.0368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1111,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Moraceae,Morus,Morus nigra,,Black Mulberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vinaroz,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,768,,,1056.41956,1200.552557,768,1056.41956,1200.552557,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1112,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,25.6,,,35.21398534,40.01841855,25.6,35.21398534,40.01841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1113,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Common prickly pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,256,,,352.1398534,400.1841855,256,352.1398534,400.1841855,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1114,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1115,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1075.2,,,1478.987384,1680.773579,1075.2,1478.987384,1680.773579,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1116,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Foyos,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,51.2,,,70.42797068,80.0368371,51.2,70.42797068,80.0368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios.Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1117,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2252.8,,,3098.83071,3521.620833,2252.8,3098.83071,3521.620833,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios.Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1118,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios.Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1119,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfas del Pi,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,512,,,704.2797068,800.368371,512,704.2797068,800.368371,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1120,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2048,,,2817.118827,3201.473484,2048,2817.118827,3201.473484,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1121,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Faz,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1024,,,1408.559414,1600.736742,1024,1408.559414,1600.736742,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios.Original species name is a synonym. Name in the document = Pennisetum setaceum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1122,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,204.8,,,281.7118827,320.1473484,204.8,281.7118827,320.1473484,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1123,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,1062.4,,,1461.380392,1660.76437,1062.4,1461.380392,1660.76437,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios.  Species name in the document is a synonym. Original name in document = Robinia pseudacacia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1124,TC,SP_29,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2014,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2015,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia filifera,,American cotton palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vinaroz,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,384,,,528.2097801,600.2762783,384,528.2097801,600.2762783,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1136,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6144,,,9791.144924,9769.679005,6144,9791.144924,9769.679005,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.2,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1137,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Western Coastal Wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche/Guardamar,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,3328,,,5572.533995,5219.85205,3328,5572.533995,5219.85205,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1138,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Western Coastal Wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche/Guardamar,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1664,,,2651.768417,2645.954731,1664,2651.768417,2645.954731,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1139,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malvales,Malvaceae,Abutilon,Abutilon theophrasti,,velvet leaf,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,87.04,,,129.7121216,134.5879533,87.04,129.7121216,134.5879533,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1140,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Western Coastal Wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1326.08,,,1976.202324,2050.487053,1326.08,1976.202324,2050.487053,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1141,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Western Coastal Wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,396.8,,,591.3346722,613.5627283,396.8,591.3346722,613.5627283,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1142,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Western Coastal Wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,76.8,,,114.451872,118.7540765,76.8,114.451872,118.7540765,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1143,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,856.32,,,1276.138373,1324.107952,856.32,1276.138373,1324.107952,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1144,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,352,,,524.5710801,544.2895171,352,524.5710801,544.2895171,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1145,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,32,,,47.68828001,49.48086519,32,47.68828001,49.48086519,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1146,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,458.24,,,682.8961698,708.5659895,458.24,682.8961698,708.5659895,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1147,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,128,,,190.7531201,197.9234608,128,190.7531201,197.9234608,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1148,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,64,,,95.37656003,98.96173038,64,95.37656003,98.96173038,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1149,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,92.16,,,137.3422464,142.5048917,92.16,137.3422464,142.5048917,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1150,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,307.2,,,457.8074881,475.0163058,307.2,457.8074881,475.0163058,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1151,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,153.6,,,228.9037441,237.5081529,153.6,228.9037441,237.5081529,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1152,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,179.2,,,267.0543681,277.0928451,179.2,267.0543681,277.0928451,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1153,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,8.96,,,13.3527184,13.85464225,8.96,13.3527184,13.85464225,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1154,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,432.64,,,644.7455458,668.9812974,432.64,644.7455458,668.9812974,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1156,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Geraniales,Geraniaceae,Pelargonium,Pelargonium capitatum,,rose geranium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,42.24,,,62.94852962,65.31474205,42.24,62.94852962,65.31474205,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1158,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malvales,Malvaceae,Abutilon,Abutilon theophrasti,,velvet leaf,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,307.2,,,457.8074881,475.0163058,307.2,457.8074881,475.0163058,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1159,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malvales,Malvaceae,Abutilon,Abutilon theophrasti,,velvet leaf,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,216,,,321.8958901,333.99584,216,321.8958901,333.99584,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1160,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,512,,,763.0124802,791.693843,512,763.0124802,791.693843,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1161,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,154.56,,,230.3343925,238.9925789,154.56,230.3343925,238.9925789,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.3,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1162,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lucena del Cid,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,512,,,763.0124802,791.693843,512,763.0124802,791.693843,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1163,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montanejos,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,345.6,,,515.0334241,534.393344,345.6,515.0334241,534.393344,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1164,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,102.4,,,152.602496,158.3387686,102.4,152.602496,158.3387686,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1165,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,5977.6,,,8908.170706,9243.025617,5977.6,8908.170706,9243.025617,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1166,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Grao de Castellon,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,3701.76,,,5516.580232,5723.946485,3701.76,5516.580232,5723.946485,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1167,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,230.4,,,343.3556161,356.2622294,230.4,343.3556161,356.2622294,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1168,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniarres,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,232.96,,,347.1706785,360.2206986,232.96,347.1706785,360.2206986,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1169,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,896,,,1335.27184,1385.464225,896,1335.27184,1385.464225,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1170,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Grao de Castellon,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,8683.2,,,12940.21478,13426.63277,8683.2,12940.21478,13426.63277,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1173,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,358.4,,,534.1087361,554.1856901,358.4,534.1087361,554.1856901,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1175,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,4.64,,,6.914800602,7.174725452,4.64,6.914800602,7.174725452,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1176,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,254.4,,,379.1218261,393.3728783,254.4,379.1218261,393.3728783,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1177,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,38.4,,,57.22593602,59.37703823,38.4,57.22593602,59.37703823,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 4. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1183,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,19.2,,,28.61296801,29.68851911,19.2,28.61296801,29.68851911,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1184,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,103.68,,,154.5100272,160.3180032,103.68,154.5100272,160.3180032,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1185,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,587.52,,,875.556821,908.4686849,587.52,875.556821,908.4686849,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1186,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1154.56,,,1720.593143,1785.269616,1154.56,1720.593143,1785.269616,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1187,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfauir,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,2432,,,3624.309281,3760.545754,2432,3624.309281,3760.545754,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1188,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,640,,,953.7656003,989.6173038,640,953.7656003,989.6173038,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1189,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,7296,,,10872.92784,11281.63726,7296,10872.92784,11281.63726,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1190,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,138.24,,,206.0133697,213.7573376,138.24,206.0133697,213.7573376,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1191,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villena,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,250.88,,,373.8761153,387.9299831,250.88,373.8761153,387.9299831,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1192,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jativa,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,51.2,,,76.30124802,79.1693843,51.2,76.30124802,79.1693843,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1193,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe microstigma,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcala de Chivert,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,172.8,,,257.5167121,267.196672,172.8,257.5167121,267.196672,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5. Synonym of  Aloe saponaria,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1194,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe microstigma,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,391.68,,,583.7045474,605.6457899,391.68,583.7045474,605.6457899,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5. Synonym of  Aloe saponaria,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1195,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe vera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oropesa del Mar,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,43.52,,,64.85606082,67.29397666,43.52,64.85606082,67.29397666,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1196,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe vera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,138.24,,,206.0133697,213.7573376,138.24,206.0133697,213.7573376,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1197,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,409.6,,,610.4099842,633.3550744,409.6,610.4099842,633.3550744,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1198,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,128,,,190.7531201,197.9234608,128,190.7531201,197.9234608,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1199,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Casinos,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,829.44,,,1236.080218,1282.544026,829.44,1236.080218,1282.544026,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1200,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,7936,,,11826.69344,12271.25457,7936,11826.69344,12271.25457,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1201,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,768,,,1144.51872,1187.540765,768,1144.51872,1187.540765,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1202,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Luchente,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,8089.6,,,12055.59719,12508.76272,8089.6,12055.59719,12508.76272,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1203,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,2912,,,4339.633481,4502.758732,2912,4339.633481,4502.758732,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1204,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,3438.08,,,5123.628805,5316.224156,3438.08,5123.628805,5316.224156,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1205,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,288,,,429.1945201,445.3277867,288,429.1945201,445.3277867,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1206,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,138.24,,,206.0133697,213.7573376,138.24,206.0133697,213.7573376,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1207,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,New Zealand manatoka,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,126.72,,,188.8455889,195.9442261,126.72,188.8455889,195.9442261,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1208,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,2848,,,4244.256921,4403.797002,2848,4244.256921,4403.797002,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1209,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Casinos,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,725.76,,,1081.570191,1122.226022,725.76,1081.570191,1122.226022,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1210,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,345.6,,,515.0334241,534.393344,345.6,515.0334241,534.393344,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1211,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,103.68,,,154.5100272,160.3180032,103.68,154.5100272,160.3180032,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1212,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,138.24,,,206.0133697,213.7573376,138.24,206.0133697,213.7573376,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1213,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,512,,,763.0124802,791.693843,512,763.0124802,791.693843,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1216,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,614.4,,,915.6149763,950.0326116,614.4,915.6149763,950.0326116,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1218,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,188.16,,,280.4070865,290.9474873,188.16,280.4070865,290.9474873,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1219,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,417.28,,,621.8551714,645.2304821,417.28,621.8551714,645.2304821,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1220,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Spartium,Spartium junceum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,130.56,,,194.5681825,201.88193,130.56,194.5681825,201.88193,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1226,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Stipa,Stipa caudata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Aldaya,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,311.04,,,463.5300817,480.9540096,311.04,463.5300817,480.9540096,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1227,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Araujia,Araujia sericifera,,Cape-dandelion,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,20.48,,,30.52049921,31.66775372,20.48,30.52049921,31.66775372,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1228,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,512,,,763.0124802,791.693843,512,763.0124802,791.693843,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1229,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Ungla de gat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Serra,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,138.24,,,206.0133697,213.7573376,138.24,206.0133697,213.7573376,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1230,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,10688,,,15927.88552,16526.60897,10688,15927.88552,16526.60897,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1231,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,414.72,,,618.040109,641.2720128,414.72,618.040109,641.2720128,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1232,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1347.84,,,2008.630354,2084.134042,1347.84,2008.630354,2084.134042,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1233,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1603.84,,,2390.136594,2479.980963,1603.84,2390.136594,2479.980963,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1234,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,46.08,,,68.67112322,71.25244587,46.08,68.67112322,71.25244587,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1235,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Serra,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,414.72,,,618.040109,641.2720128,414.72,618.040109,641.2720128,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1236,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villar del Arzobispo,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,81.92,,,122.0819968,126.6710149,81.92,122.0819968,126.6710149,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1237,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,49.92,,,74.39371682,77.19014969,49.92,74.39371682,77.19014969,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1238,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,414.72,,,618.040109,641.2720128,414.72,618.040109,641.2720128,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1239,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Busot,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,153.6,,,228.9037441,237.5081529,153.6,228.9037441,237.5081529,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1240,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Serra,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1762.56,,,2626.670463,2725.406055,1762.56,2626.670463,2725.406055,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1241,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,64,,,95.37656003,98.96173038,64,95.37656003,98.96173038,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1242,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,230.4,,,343.3556161,356.2622294,230.4,343.3556161,356.2622294,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1243,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,89.6,,,133.527184,138.5464225,89.6,133.527184,138.5464225,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1244,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,311.04,,,463.5300817,480.9540096,311.04,463.5300817,480.9540096,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1245,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Busot,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,102.4,,,152.602496,158.3387686,102.4,152.602496,158.3387686,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1246,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Casinos,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,61.44,,,91.56149763,95.00326116,61.44,91.56149763,95.00326116,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1247,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Serra,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1184.64,,,1765.420126,1831.781629,1184.64,1765.420126,1831.781629,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1248,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,51.2,,,76.30124802,79.1693843,51.2,76.30124802,79.1693843,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1249,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,7.68,,,11.4451872,11.87540765,7.68,11.4451872,11.87540765,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 6,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1250,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,3916.8,,,5837.045474,6056.457899,3916.8,5837.045474,6056.457899,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1251,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuart de Poblet,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,153.6,,,228.9037441,237.5081529,153.6,228.9037441,237.5081529,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1252,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,204.8,,,305.2049921,316.6775372,204.8,305.2049921,316.6775372,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1253,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Silla,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,128,,,190.7531201,197.9234608,128,190.7531201,197.9234608,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1254,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tavernes de la Valldigna,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1664,,,2479.790561,2573.00499,1664,2479.790561,2573.00499,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1256,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Albufera de Valencia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,13824,,,22030.07608,21981.77776,13824,22030.07608,21981.77776,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1260,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Carassius,Carassius auratus,,edible goldfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algemesi,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,268.8,,,400.5815521,415.6392676,268.8,400.5815521,415.6392676,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 22,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1261,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Carassius,Carassius auratus,,edible goldfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,87.04,,,129.7121216,134.5879533,87.04,129.7121216,134.5879533,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 22,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1262,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Carassius,Carassius auratus,,edible goldfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,422.4,,,629.4852962,653.1474205,422.4,629.4852962,653.1474205,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 22,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1263,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,German carp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1459.2,,,2174.585569,2256.327453,1459.2,2174.585569,2256.327453,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 22,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1264,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,German carp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,394.24,,,587.5196098,609.6042591,394.24,587.5196098,609.6042591,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 22,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1265,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,German carp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,85.44,,,127.3277076,132.1139101,85.44,127.3277076,132.1139101,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 22,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1266,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,German carp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,197.12,,,293.7598049,304.8021296,197.12,293.7598049,304.8021296,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1267,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,German carp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,110.84,,,165.1802799,171.3893468,110.84,165.1802799,171.3893468,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1268,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,German carp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,325.76,,,485.4666905,503.7152076,325.76,485.4666905,503.7152076,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1269,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,German carp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,30.72,,,45.78074881,47.50163058,30.72,45.78074881,47.50163058,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1270,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,mosquitofish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algemesi,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,9.6,,,14.306484,14.84425956,9.6,14.306484,14.84425956,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1271,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,mosquitofish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1227.52,,,1829.322421,1898.085989,1227.52,1829.322421,1898.085989,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1272,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,mosquitofish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,38.4,,,57.22593602,59.37703823,38.4,57.22593602,59.37703823,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1273,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,mosquitofish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,674.88,,,1005.745825,1043.551447,674.88,1005.745825,1043.551447,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1274,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,mosquitofish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,61.44,,,91.56149763,95.00326116,61.44,91.56149763,95.00326116,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1275,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,mosquitofish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,165.12,,,246.0715249,255.3212644,165.12,246.0715249,255.3212644,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1276,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Graptemys,Graptemys pseudogeographica,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,2.56,,,3.815062401,3.958469215,2.56,3.815062401,3.958469215,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23. Original name is a synonym (G. kohnii),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1277,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Graptemys,Graptemys pseudogeographica,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,12.28,,,18.30037746,18.98828202,12.28,18.30037746,18.98828202,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23. Original name is a synonym (G. kohnii),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1278,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algemesi,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,19.2,,,28.61296801,29.68851911,19.2,28.61296801,29.68851911,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1279,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,38.4,,,57.22593602,59.37703823,38.4,57.22593602,59.37703823,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1280,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,12.8,,,19.07531201,19.79234608,12.8,19.07531201,19.79234608,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1281,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,86.4,,,128.758356,133.598336,86.4,128.758356,133.598336,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1282,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,104.96,,,156.4175584,162.2972378,104.96,156.4175584,162.2972378,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1283,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,American black bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,99.84,,,148.7874336,154.3802994,99.84,148.7874336,154.3802994,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1284,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,American black bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,326.4,,,486.4204561,504.7048249,326.4,486.4204561,504.7048249,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1285,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,American black bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,220.16,,,328.0953665,340.4283525,220.16,328.0953665,340.4283525,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1286,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1651.2,,,2460.715249,2553.212644,1651.2,2460.715249,2553.212644,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1287,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1440,,,2145.972601,2226.638933,1440,2145.972601,2226.638933,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1288,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,401.92,,,598.964797,621.4796668,401.92,598.964797,621.4796668,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1289,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,2534.4,,,3776.911777,3918.884523,2534.4,3776.911777,3918.884523,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1290,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,650.24,,,969.0258499,1005.451181,650.24,969.0258499,1005.451181,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1291,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,23.04,,,34.33556161,35.62622294,23.04,34.33556161,35.62622294,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1292,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,80.64,,,120.1744656,124.6917803,80.64,120.1744656,124.6917803,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1293,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,192,,,286.1296801,296.8851911,192,286.1296801,296.8851911,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1294,TC,SP_24,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2010,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2011,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,188.16,,,280.4070865,290.9474873,188.16,280.4070865,290.9474873,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 23,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1298,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1100.8,,,1669.731433,1679.750113,1100.8,1669.731433,1679.750113,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1299,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,87.04,,,132.0252761,132.8174508,87.04,132.0252761,132.8174508,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1300,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,19.2,,,29.12322267,29.29796709,19.2,29.12322267,29.29796709,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1301,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,35.84,,,54.36334899,54.68953858,35.84,54.36334899,54.68953858,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1302,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,15.36,,,23.29857814,23.43837368,15.36,23.29857814,23.43837368,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1303,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,15.36,,,23.29857814,23.43837368,15.36,23.29857814,23.43837368,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.4,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1304,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Araujia,Araujia sericifera,,Cape-dandelion,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,51.2,,,77.66192713,78.12791225,51.2,77.66192713,78.12791225,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1305,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,238.08,,,361.1279612,363.294792,238.08,361.1279612,363.294792,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1306,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,128,,,194.1548178,195.3197806,128,194.1548178,195.3197806,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1307,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Aspe,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,279.04,,,423.2575029,425.7971218,279.04,423.2575029,425.7971218,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1308,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,921.6,,,1397.914688,1406.302421,921.6,1397.914688,1406.302421,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1309,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Aster,Aster squamatus,,Ajenjo de china,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,204.8,,,310.6477085,312.511649,204.8,310.6477085,312.511649,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1310,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1182.72,,,1793.990517,1804.754773,1182.72,1793.990517,1804.754773,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1311,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,204.8,,,310.6477085,312.511649,204.8,310.6477085,312.511649,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1312,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1066.24,,,1617.309633,1627.013773,1066.24,1617.309633,1627.013773,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1313,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Quatretonda,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,896,,,1359.083725,1367.238464,896,1359.083725,1367.238464,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1314,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1024,,,1553.238543,1562.558245,1024,1553.238543,1562.558245,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1315,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,81.92,,,124.2590834,125.0046596,81.92,124.2590834,125.0046596,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1316,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,Juncia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,249.6,,,378.6018948,380.8735722,249.6,378.6018948,380.8735722,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1317,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,Juncia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniarres,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,156.16,,,236.8688778,238.2901324,156.16,236.8688778,238.2901324,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1318,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,15.36,,,23.29857814,23.43837368,15.36,23.29857814,23.43837368,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1319,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,2831.36,,,4294.70457,4320.473547,2831.36,4294.70457,4320.473547,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1321,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,7402.24,,,11227.97312,11295.34291,7402.24,11227.97312,11295.34291,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1324,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,322.56,,,489.2701409,492.2058472,322.56,489.2701409,492.2058472,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1325,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,Enotera,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,926.72,,,1405.680881,1414.115212,926.72,1405.680881,1414.115212,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1326,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,Enotera,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1408,,,2135.702996,2148.517587,1408,2135.702996,2148.517587,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1327,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,Enotera,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4764.16,,,7226.44232,7269.802235,4764.16,7226.44232,7269.802235,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1328,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,Enotera,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,204.8,,,310.6477085,312.511649,204.8,310.6477085,312.511649,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1329,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,76.8,,,116.4928907,117.1918684,76.8,116.4928907,117.1918684,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1330,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,604.16,,,916.4107401,921.9093646,604.16,916.4107401,921.9093646,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.5,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1332,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,coastal wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,896,,,1359.083725,1367.238464,896,1359.083725,1367.238464,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1333,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,coastal wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,184.32,,,279.5829377,281.2604841,184.32,279.5829377,281.2604841,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1334,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,Ellington's curse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Callosa de Segura,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1094.4,,,1660.023692,1669.984124,1094.4,1660.023692,1669.984124,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1337,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4857.6,,,7368.175337,7412.385675,4857.6,7368.175337,7412.385675,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1338,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,38.4,,,58.24644535,58.59593419,38.4,58.24644535,58.59593419,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1339,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canet lo Roig,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,67.84,,,102.9020534,103.5194837,67.84,102.9020534,103.5194837,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1340,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,128,,,194.1548178,195.3197806,128,194.1548178,195.3197806,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1341,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,40.96,,,62.12954171,62.5023298,40.96,62.12954171,62.5023298,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1342,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,2488.32,,,3774.369659,3797.016535,2488.32,3774.369659,3797.016535,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1343,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Serra,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,414.72,,,629.0616098,632.8360892,414.72,629.0616098,632.8360892,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1344,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,88.32,,,133.9668243,134.7706486,88.32,133.9668243,134.7706486,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1347,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailanto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3584,,,5436.334899,5468.953858,3584,5436.334899,5468.953858,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1348,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailanto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chiva,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,2090.24,,,3170.548175,3189.572018,2090.24,3170.548175,3189.572018,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1349,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailanto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Quatretonda,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,673.28,,,1021.254342,1027.382046,673.28,1021.254342,1027.382046,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1350,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailanto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villena,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,376.32,,,570.8151644,574.240155,376.32,570.8151644,574.240155,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1351,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailanto,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1177.6,,,1786.224324,1796.941982,1177.6,1786.224324,1796.941982,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1352,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe arborescens,,Aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,51.2,,,77.66192713,78.12791225,51.2,77.66192713,78.12791225,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1353,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe vera,,Aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oropesa del Mar,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,37.12,,,56.30489717,56.64273638,37.12,56.30489717,56.64273638,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1354,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1017.6,,,1543.530802,1552.792256,1017.6,1543.530802,1552.792256,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1355,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lucena del Cid,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,153.6,,,232.9857814,234.3837368,153.6,232.9857814,234.3837368,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1356,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montanejos,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1331.2,,,2019.210105,2031.325719,1331.2,2019.210105,2031.325719,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1357,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,78.08,,,118.4344389,119.1450662,78.08,118.4344389,119.1450662,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1358,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,431.36,,,654.3017361,658.2276607,431.36,654.3017361,658.2276607,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1359,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Luchente,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,62.72,,,95.13586074,95.70669251,62.72,95.13586074,95.70669251,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1360,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcora,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,32,,,48.53870446,48.82994516,32,48.53870446,48.82994516,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1361,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,128,,,194.1548178,195.3197806,128,194.1548178,195.3197806,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1362,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,200.96,,,304.823064,306.6520556,200.96,304.823064,306.6520556,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1363,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,138.24,,,209.6872033,210.9453631,138.24,209.6872033,210.9453631,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1364,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,421.12,,,638.7693507,642.6020783,421.12,638.7693507,642.6020783,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1365,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Estivella,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,2592,,,3931.635061,3955.225558,2592,3931.635061,3955.225558,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1366,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,2864.64,,,4345.184823,4371.25669,2864.64,4345.184823,4371.25669,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1367,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1120,,,1698.854656,1709.04808,1120,1698.854656,1709.04808,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1368,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Naquera,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,81.92,,,124.2590834,125.0046596,81.92,124.2590834,125.0046596,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1369,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,288,,,436.8483401,439.4695064,288,436.8483401,439.4695064,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1370,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1152,,,1747.39336,1757.878026,1152,1747.39336,1757.878026,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1371,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,299.52,,,454.3222737,457.0482867,299.52,454.3222737,457.0482867,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1372,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,810.24,,,1228.999997,1236.374211,810.24,1228.999997,1236.374211,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1373,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,38.4,,,58.24644535,58.59593419,38.4,58.24644535,58.59593419,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1374,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicarlo,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,51.2,,,77.66192713,78.12791225,51.2,77.66192713,78.12791225,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1375,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1975.04,,,2995.808839,3013.784215,1975.04,2995.808839,3013.784215,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1376,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,128,,,194.1548178,195.3197806,128,194.1548178,195.3197806,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1377,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,380.16,,,576.6398089,580.0997485,380.16,576.6398089,580.0997485,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1379,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Pobla de Benifassa,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,10.24,,,15.53238543,15.62558245,10.24,15.53238543,15.62558245,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1380,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Unspecified,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,256,,,388.3096357,390.6395613,256,388.3096357,390.6395613,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1381,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,Izote Kukil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,396.8,,,601.8799353,605.4913199,396.8,601.8799353,605.4913199,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7. Original species name in the document is a synonym= Yucca elephantipes,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1382,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca gigantea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Unspecified,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,256,,,388.3096357,390.6395613,256,388.3096357,390.6395613,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1383,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canals,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,768,,,1164.928907,1171.918684,768,1164.928907,1171.918684,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1384,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,222.72,,,337.829383,339.8564183,222.72,337.829383,339.8564183,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1385,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Stipa,Stipa caudata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuart de Poblet,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,46.08,,,69.89573442,70.31512103,46.08,69.89573442,70.31512103,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1386,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1420.8,,,2155.118478,2168.049565,1420.8,2155.118478,2168.049565,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1387,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,98.56,,,149.4992097,150.3962311,98.56,149.4992097,150.3962311,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1388,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,61.44,,,93.19431256,93.7534947,61.44,93.19431256,93.7534947,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1389,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,107.52,,,163.090047,164.0686157,107.52,163.090047,164.0686157,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1390,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,158.72,,,240.7519741,242.196528,158.72,240.7519741,242.196528,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1391,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,972.8,,,1475.576615,1484.430333,972.8,1475.576615,1484.430333,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1392,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Estivella,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,622.08,,,943.5924146,949.2541338,622.08,943.5924146,949.2541338,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1393,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4354.56,,,6605.146903,6644.778937,4354.56,6605.146903,6644.778937,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1394,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalance,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,7773.44,,,11791.02209,11861.77028,7773.44,11791.02209,11861.77028,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1395,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lliria,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,478.72,,,726.1390187,730.4959795,478.72,726.1390187,730.4959795,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1396,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,34.56,,,52.42180081,52.73634077,34.56,52.42180081,52.73634077,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1397,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Naquera,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,184.32,,,279.5829377,281.2604841,184.32,279.5829377,281.2604841,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1398,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tibi,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,435.2,,,660.1263806,664.0872541,435.2,660.1263806,664.0872541,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1399,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3.84,,,5.824644535,5.859593419,3.84,5.824644535,5.859593419,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1400,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Yatova,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,81.92,,,124.2590834,125.0046596,81.92,124.2590834,125.0046596,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1401,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,40.96,,,62.12954171,62.5023298,40.96,62.12954171,62.5023298,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1402,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Albal,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,46.08,,,69.89573442,70.31512103,46.08,69.89573442,70.31512103,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1403,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,256,,,388.3096357,390.6395613,256,388.3096357,390.6395613,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1404,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,312.32,,,473.7377555,476.5802647,312.32,473.7377555,476.5802647,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1411,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Unspecified,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,857.6,,,1300.837279,1308.64253,857.6,1300.837279,1308.64253,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1412,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Unspecified,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,488.96,,,741.6714041,746.121562,488.96,741.6714041,746.121562,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1413,TC,SP_25,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2011,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2012,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,tiarili,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,51.2,,,77.66192713,78.12791225,51.2,77.66192713,78.12791225,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE1419,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1126.4,,,1545.04799,1730.375939,1126.4,1545.04799,1730.375939,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1420,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7769.6,,,10657.31966,11935.66131,7769.6,10657.31966,11935.66131,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1421,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7.68,,,10.53441812,11.79801777,7.68,10.53441812,11.79801777,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1422,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,19.2,,,26.33604529,29.49504442,19.2,26.33604529,29.49504442,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1423,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar de la Safor,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,168.96,,,231.7571985,259.5563909,168.96,231.7571985,259.5563909,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1424,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,332.8,,,456.4914517,511.2474366,332.8,456.4914517,511.2474366,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1425,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,29.44,,,40.38193611,45.22573477,29.44,40.38193611,45.22573477,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1426,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,125.44,,,172.0621626,192.7009569,125.44,172.0621626,192.7009569,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1427,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar de la Safor,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,302.08,,,414.3537792,464.0553655,302.08,414.3537792,464.0553655,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1428,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,588.8,,,807.6387222,904.5146955,588.8,807.6387222,904.5146955,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1429,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,51.2,,,70.2294541,78.65345178,51.2,70.2294541,78.65345178,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1430,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7.68,,,10.53441812,11.79801777,7.68,10.53441812,11.79801777,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1431,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,314.88,,,431.9111427,483.7187284,314.88,431.9111427,483.7187284,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1432,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,20.48,,,28.09178164,31.46138071,20.48,28.09178164,31.46138071,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1433,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar de la Safor,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,168.96,,,231.7571985,259.5563909,168.96,231.7571985,259.5563909,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1434,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Piles,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1075.2,,,1474.818536,1651.722487,1075.2,1474.818536,1651.722487,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1435,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,172.8,,,237.0244076,265.4553998,172.8,237.0244076,265.4553998,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1436,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1203.2,,,1650.392171,1848.356117,1203.2,1650.392171,1848.356117,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1437,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3.84,,,5.267209058,5.899008883,3.84,5.267209058,5.899008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1438,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,108.8,,,149.23759,167.138585,108.8,149.23759,167.138585,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1439,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,524.8,,,719.8519046,806.1978807,524.8,719.8519046,806.1978807,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1440,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,798.72,,,1095.579484,1226.993848,798.72,1095.579484,1226.993848,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1441,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,5.12,,,7.02294541,7.865345178,5.12,7.02294541,7.865345178,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1442,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,12.8,,,17.55736353,19.66336294,12.8,17.55736353,19.66336294,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1443,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,12.8,,,17.55736353,19.66336294,12.8,17.55736353,19.66336294,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1444,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,870.4,,,1193.90072,1337.10868,870.4,1193.90072,1337.10868,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1445,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canet lo Roig,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15.36,,,21.06883623,23.59603553,15.36,21.06883623,23.59603553,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1446,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,335.36,,,460.0029244,515.1801092,335.36,460.0029244,515.1801092,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1447,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,138.24,,,189.6195261,212.3643198,138.24,189.6195261,212.3643198,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1448,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,672,,,921.7615851,1032.326555,672,921.7615851,1032.326555,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1449,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,94.72,,,129.9244901,145.5088858,94.72,129.9244901,145.5088858,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1450,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,972.8,,,1334.359628,1494.415584,972.8,1334.359628,1494.415584,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1451,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,922.88,,,1265.88591,1417.728468,922.88,1265.88591,1417.728468,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1452,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chiva,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,829.44,,,1137.717156,1274.185919,829.44,1137.717156,1274.185919,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1453,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gaianes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,71.68,,,98.32123574,110.1148325,71.68,98.32123574,110.1148325,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1454,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe arborescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,103.68,,,142.2146446,159.2732399,103.68,142.2146446,159.2732399,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1455,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe vera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,103.68,,,142.2146446,159.2732399,103.68,142.2146446,159.2732399,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1457,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Araujia,Araujia sericifera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1113.6,,,1527.490627,1710.712576,1113.6,1527.490627,1710.712576,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1458,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Aín,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,238.08,,,326.5669616,365.7385508,238.08,326.5669616,365.7385508,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1459,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cortes de Arenoso,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,8.96,,,12.29015447,13.76435406,8.96,12.29015447,13.76435406,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1460,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2.56,,,3.511472705,3.932672589,2.56,3.511472705,3.932672589,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1461,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,480,,,658.4011322,737.3761104,480,658.4011322,737.3761104,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1462,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lucena del Cid,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,204.8,,,280.9178164,314.6138071,204.8,280.9178164,314.6138071,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1463,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montanejos,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,661.76,,,907.7156943,1016.595864,661.76,907.7156943,1016.595864,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1464,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,514.56,,,705.8060137,790.4671904,514.56,705.8060137,790.4671904,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1465,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,92.16,,,126.4130174,141.5762132,92.16,126.4130174,141.5762132,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1466,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,650.24,,,891.9140671,998.8988376,650.24,891.9140671,998.8988376,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1467,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1100.8,,,1509.933263,1691.049213,1100.8,1509.933263,1691.049213,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1468,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,587.52,,,805.8829858,902.5483592,587.52,805.8829858,902.5483592,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1469,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1053.44,,,1444.971018,1618.29477,1053.44,1444.971018,1618.29477,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1470,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,615.68,,,844.5091856,945.8077577,615.68,844.5091856,945.8077577,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1471,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Llosa,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,32,,,43.89340881,49.15840736,32,43.89340881,49.15840736,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1472,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,289.28,,,396.7964157,444.3920026,289.28,396.7964157,444.3920026,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1473,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chilches,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,32,,,43.89340881,49.15840736,32,43.89340881,49.15840736,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1474,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1024,,,1404.589082,1573.069036,1024,1404.589082,1573.069036,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1475,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,128,,,175.5736353,196.6336294,128,175.5736353,196.6336294,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1476,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,376.32,,,516.1864877,578.1028706,376.32,516.1864877,578.1028706,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1477,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Manuel,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,4556.8,,,6250.421415,7000.157208,4556.8,6250.421415,7000.157208,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1478,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ebenaceae,Diospyros,Diospyros kaki,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,241.92,,,331.8341706,371.6375597,241.92,331.8341706,371.6375597,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1479,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,812.8,,,1114.892584,1248.623547,812.8,1114.892584,1248.623547,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1480,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,4702.72,,,6450.575359,7224.319546,4702.72,6450.575359,7224.319546,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1481,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalon,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,128,,,175.5736353,196.6336294,128,175.5736353,196.6336294,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1483,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2332.16,,,3198.951634,3582.664729,2332.16,3198.951634,3582.664729,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1485,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,386.56,,,530.2323785,593.8335609,386.56,530.2323785,593.8335609,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1487,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,6702.08,,,9193.035542,10295.73684,6702.08,9193.035542,10295.73684,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1488,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,588.8,,,807.6387222,904.5146955,588.8,807.6387222,904.5146955,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1489,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,48,,,65.84011322,73.73761104,48,65.84011322,73.73761104,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1490,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puzol,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,288,,,395.0406793,442.4256663,288,395.0406793,442.4256663,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1491,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2868.48,,,3934.605166,4406.559636,2868.48,3934.605166,4406.559636,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1492,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,38.4,,,52.67209058,58.99008883,38.4,52.67209058,58.99008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1493,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,179.2,,,245.8030894,275.2870812,179.2,245.8030894,275.2870812,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1494,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,229.12,,,314.2768071,351.9741967,229.12,314.2768071,351.9741967,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1495,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia natans,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,165.12,,,226.4899895,253.657382,165.12,226.4899895,253.657382,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1497,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,38.4,,,52.67209058,58.99008883,38.4,52.67209058,58.99008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.7-8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1498,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1664,,,2282.457258,2556.237183,1664,2282.457258,2556.237183,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1499,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,102.4,,,140.4589082,157.3069036,102.4,140.4589082,157.3069036,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1500,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,102.4,,,140.4589082,157.3069036,102.4,140.4589082,157.3069036,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1501,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,51.2,,,70.2294541,78.65345178,51.2,70.2294541,78.65345178,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1502,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,384,,,526.7209058,589.9008883,384,526.7209058,589.9008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.8,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1503,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia humifusa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,102.4,,,140.4589082,157.3069036,102.4,140.4589082,157.3069036,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.8. Original name in document was a synonym (Opuntia ammophila),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1505,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Callosa de Segura,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2380.8,,,3265.669616,3657.385508,2380.8,3265.669616,3657.385508,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1506,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,96,,,131.6802264,147.4752221,96,131.6802264,147.4752221,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1507,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Pobla de Tornesa,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,392.96,,,539.0110602,603.6652424,392.96,539.0110602,603.6652424,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1509,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,748.8,,,1027.105766,1150.306732,748.8,1027.105766,1150.306732,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1510,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1397.76,,,1917.264097,2147.239234,1397.76,1917.264097,2147.239234,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1511,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,103.68,,,142.2146446,159.2732399,103.68,142.2146446,159.2732399,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1512,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,124.16,,,170.3064262,190.7346206,124.16,170.3064262,190.7346206,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1513,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3462.4,,,4749.266834,5318.939677,3462.4,4749.266834,5318.939677,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1514,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chera,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3805.44,,,5219.804176,5845.917804,3805.44,5219.804176,5845.917804,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1515,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villena,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,34.56,,,47.40488152,53.09107995,34.56,47.40488152,53.09107995,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1516,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,102.4,,,140.4589082,157.3069036,102.4,140.4589082,157.3069036,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1517,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe arborescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,153.6,,,210.6883623,235.9603553,153.6,210.6883623,235.9603553,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1518,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe arborescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,103.68,,,142.2146446,159.2732399,103.68,142.2146446,159.2732399,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1519,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe microstigma,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,192,,,263.3604529,294.9504442,192,263.3604529,294.9504442,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10. Original name in the document is synomym =Aloe saponaria,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1520,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,298.24,,,409.0865701,458.1563566,298.24,409.0865701,458.1563566,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1521,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,541.44,,,742.6764771,831.7602526,541.44,742.6764771,831.7602526,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1522,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Viver,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,204.8,,,280.9178164,314.6138071,204.8,280.9178164,314.6138071,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1523,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,Madeira-vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,394.24,,,540.7667966,605.6315787,394.24,540.7667966,605.6315787,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1524,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,Madeira-vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vinaroz,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3.84,,,5.267209058,5.899008883,3.84,5.267209058,5.899008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1525,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,384,,,526.7209058,589.9008883,384,526.7209058,589.9008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1526,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,128,,,175.5736353,196.6336294,128,175.5736353,196.6336294,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1527,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcora,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15.36,,,21.06883623,23.59603553,15.36,21.06883623,23.59603553,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1528,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2100.48,,,2881.163355,3226.757859,2100.48,2881.163355,3226.757859,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1529,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,6.4,,,8.778681763,9.831681472,6.4,8.778681763,9.831681472,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1530,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Casinos,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,46.08,,,63.20650869,70.7881066,46.08,63.20650869,70.7881066,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1531,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cox,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,931.84,,,1278.176065,1431.492822,931.84,1278.176065,1431.492822,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1532,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,512,,,702.294541,786.5345178,512,702.294541,786.5345178,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1533,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,645.12,,,884.8911217,991.0334924,645.12,884.8911217,991.0334924,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1534,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lliria,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,138.24,,,189.6195261,212.3643198,138.24,189.6195261,212.3643198,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1535,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,384,,,526.7209058,589.9008883,384,526.7209058,589.9008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1536,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Olocau,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,64,,,87.78681763,98.31681472,64,87.78681763,98.31681472,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1537,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,377.6,,,517.942224,580.0692069,377.6,517.942224,580.0692069,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1538,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,307.2,,,421.3767246,471.9207107,307.2,421.3767246,471.9207107,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1539,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,616.96,,,846.2649219,947.7740939,616.96,846.2649219,947.7740939,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1540,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,103.68,,,142.2146446,159.2732399,103.68,142.2146446,159.2732399,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1541,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,814.08,,,1116.64832,1250.589883,814.08,1116.64832,1250.589883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1542,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1034.24,,,1418.634973,1588.799726,1034.24,1418.634973,1588.799726,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1543,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia stenoclada,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,87.04,,,119.390072,133.710868,87.04,119.390072,133.710868,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1545,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,345.6,,,474.0488152,530.9107995,345.6,474.0488152,530.9107995,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1546,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,152.32,,,208.932626,233.994019,152.32,208.932626,233.994019,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1547,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,115.2,,,158.0162717,176.9702665,115.2,158.0162717,176.9702665,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1548,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,207.36,,,284.4292891,318.5464797,207.36,284.4292891,318.5464797,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1549,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,313.6,,,430.1554064,481.7523922,313.6,430.1554064,481.7523922,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1550,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Pennisetum,Pelargonium capitatum,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,192,,,263.3604529,294.9504442,192,263.3604529,294.9504442,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1552,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,69.12,,,94.80976304,106.1821599,69.12,94.80976304,106.1821599,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1553,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,96,,,131.6802264,147.4752221,96,131.6802264,147.4752221,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1554,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2.56,,,3.511472705,3.932672589,2.56,3.511472705,3.932672589,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1555,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,615.68,,,844.5091856,945.8077577,615.68,844.5091856,945.8077577,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1556,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,179.2,,,245.8030894,275.2870812,179.2,245.8030894,275.2870812,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1557,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,96,,,131.6802264,147.4752221,96,131.6802264,147.4752221,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9-10,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1558,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Estivella,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,311.04,,,426.6439337,477.8197196,311.04,426.6439337,477.8197196,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1559,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,138.24,,,189.6195261,212.3643198,138.24,189.6195261,212.3643198,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1560,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,326.4,,,447.7127699,501.4157551,326.4,447.7127699,501.4157551,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1561,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villena,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,57.6,,,79.00813587,88.48513325,57.6,79.00813587,88.48513325,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1562,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea diffusa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalance,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,414.72,,,568.8585782,637.0929594,414.72,568.8585782,637.0929594,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1563,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,823.04,,,1128.938475,1264.354237,823.04,1128.938475,1264.354237,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1564,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,250.88,,,344.1243251,385.4019137,250.88,344.1243251,385.4019137,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1565,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalance,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,384,,,526.7209058,589.9008883,384,526.7209058,589.9008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1566,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,674.56,,,925.2730578,1036.259227,674.56,925.2730578,1036.259227,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1567,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15.36,,,21.06883623,23.59603553,15.36,21.06883623,23.59603553,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1568,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,725.76,,,995.5025119,1114.912679,725.76,995.5025119,1114.912679,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1569,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,512,,,702.294541,786.5345178,512,702.294541,786.5345178,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1570,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,480,,,658.4011322,737.3761104,480,658.4011322,737.3761104,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1571,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,770.56,,,1056.953284,1183.734449,770.56,1056.953284,1183.734449,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1572,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Estivella,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,46.08,,,63.20650869,70.7881066,46.08,63.20650869,70.7881066,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1573,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,61.44,,,84.27534492,94.38414214,61.44,84.27534492,94.38414214,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1574,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalance,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,311.04,,,426.6439337,477.8197196,311.04,426.6439337,477.8197196,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1575,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Juan de Alicante,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,250.88,,,344.1243251,385.4019137,250.88,344.1243251,385.4019137,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1576,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tibi,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,20.48,,,28.09178164,31.46138071,20.48,28.09178164,31.46138071,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1577,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15.36,,,21.06883623,23.59603553,15.36,21.06883623,23.59603553,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1578,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1024,,,1404.589082,1573.069036,1024,1404.589082,1573.069036,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1579,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,256,,,351.1472705,393.2672589,256,351.1472705,393.2672589,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1580,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,192,,,263.3604529,294.9504442,192,263.3604529,294.9504442,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1582,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Catarroja,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,622.08,,,853.2878673,955.6394391,622.08,853.2878673,955.6394391,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1583,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15.36,,,21.06883623,23.59603553,15.36,21.06883623,23.59603553,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1584,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,576,,,790.0813587,884.8513325,576,790.0813587,884.8513325,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1585,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfas del Pi,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,480,,,658.4011322,737.3761104,480,658.4011322,737.3761104,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1586,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,28.16,,,38.62619976,43.25939848,28.16,38.62619976,43.25939848,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1587,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gata de Gorgos,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,61.44,,,84.27534492,94.38414214,61.44,84.27534492,94.38414214,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1588,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalon,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,604.16,,,828.7075584,928.110731,604.16,828.7075584,928.110731,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1589,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Catarroja,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3.84,,,5.267209058,5.899008883,3.84,5.267209058,5.899008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1590,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sedavi,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,414.72,,,568.8585782,637.0929594,414.72,568.8585782,637.0929594,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1591,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2598.4,,,3564.144796,3991.662678,2598.4,3564.144796,3991.662678,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1592,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,96,,,131.6802264,147.4752221,96,131.6802264,147.4752221,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1593,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,7398.4,,,10148.15612,11365.42378,7398.4,10148.15612,11365.42378,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.21,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1594,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2329.6,,,3195.440162,3578.732056,2329.6,3195.440162,3578.732056,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.21,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1595,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,128,,,175.5736353,196.6336294,128,175.5736353,196.6336294,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.24,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1596,TC,SP_27,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2012,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2013,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia natans,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Grao de Castellon,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,38.4,,,52.67209058,58.99008883,38.4,52.67209058,58.99008883,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.25,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1603,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,435.2,,,608.1737228,678.6031985,435.2,608.1737228,678.6031985,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1604,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,384,,,536.623873,598.7675281,384,536.623873,598.7675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1605,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,204.8,,,286.199399,319.3426816,204.8,286.199399,319.3426816,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1606,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1203.2,,,1681.421469,1876.138255,1203.2,1681.421469,1876.138255,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1607,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,115.2,,,160.9871619,179.6302584,115.2,160.9871619,179.6302584,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1608,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3225.6,,,4507.640534,5029.647236,3225.6,4507.640534,5029.647236,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1609,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1611,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Arctotheca,Arctotheca calendula,,Espumilla,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Verger,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1612,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1613,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1614,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1615,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1616,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,256,,,357.7492487,399.178352,256,357.7492487,399.178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1617,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,307.2,,,429.2990984,479.0140224,307.2,429.2990984,479.0140224,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1618,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1049.6,,,1466.77192,1636.631243,1049.6,1466.77192,1636.631243,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1619,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1620,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Erigeron,Erigeron canadensis,,Horseweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.6-7. Typo for Conyza canadensis?, besides Conyza canadensis is a synomym.",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1623,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,524.8,,,733.3859598,818.3156217,524.8,733.3859598,818.3156217,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1624,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1625,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,204.8,,,286.199399,319.3426816,204.8,286.199399,319.3426816,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1626,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1627,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1628,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1629,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium echinatum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7. The original name in the document = Xanthium edinatum,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1630,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1631,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Dune ecosystem,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,460.8,,,643.9486476,718.5210337,460.8,643.9486476,718.5210337,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.6-7,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1632,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1633,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1177.6,,,1645.646544,1836.220419,1177.6,1645.646544,1836.220419,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1634,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2393.6,,,3344.955475,3732.317592,2393.6,3344.955475,3732.317592,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1635,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,601.6,,,840.7107344,938.0691273,601.6,840.7107344,938.0691273,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1636,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1637,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gaianes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,256,,,357.7492487,399.178352,256,357.7492487,399.178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1638,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe microstigma,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canet lo Roig,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas. Synonym of  Aloe saponaria",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1639,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1640,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1420.8,,,1985.50833,2215.439854,1420.8,1985.50833,2215.439854,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1641,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Aspe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,422.4,,,590.2862603,658.6442809,422.4,590.2862603,658.6442809,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1642,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1643,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benimodo,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5888,,,8228.23272,9181.102097,5888,8228.23272,9181.102097,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1644,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuevas de Vinroma,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1645,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,204.8,,,286.199399,319.3426816,204.8,286.199399,319.3426816,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1646,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,256,,,357.7492487,399.178352,256,357.7492487,399.178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1647,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Masalaves,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1648,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montanejos,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,716.8,,,1001.697896,1117.699386,716.8,1001.697896,1117.699386,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1649,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Paterna,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1024,,,1430.996995,1596.713408,1024,1430.996995,1596.713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1650,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,140.8,,,196.7620868,219.5480936,140.8,196.7620868,219.5480936,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1651,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ribarroja de Turia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,6476.8,,,9051.055992,10099.21231,6476.8,9051.055992,10099.21231,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1652,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,4825.6,,,6743.573338,7524.511936,4825.6,6743.573338,7524.511936,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1653,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,307.2,,,429.2990984,479.0140224,307.2,429.2990984,479.0140224,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1654,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,460.8,,,643.9486476,718.5210337,460.8,643.9486476,718.5210337,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1655,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vinaroz,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,179.2,,,250.4244741,279.4248464,179.2,250.4244741,279.4248464,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1656,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1657,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1254.4,,,1752.971319,1955.973925,1254.4,1752.971319,1955.973925,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1658,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,64,,,89.43731217,99.79458801,64,89.43731217,99.79458801,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1659,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1660,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Llosa,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,89.6,,,125.212237,139.7124232,89.6,125.212237,139.7124232,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1661,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,204.8,,,286.199399,319.3426816,204.8,286.199399,319.3426816,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1662,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chilches,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,64,,,89.43731217,99.79458801,64,89.43731217,99.79458801,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1663,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,Madeira-vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1664,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Cocoyam,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,793.6,,,1109.022671,1237.452891,793.6,1109.022671,1237.452891,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1665,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfafara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1666,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1667,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1668,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,934.4,,,1305.784758,1457.000985,934.4,1305.784758,1457.000985,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1669,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,768,,,1073.247746,1197.535056,768,1073.247746,1197.535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1670,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1671,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1672,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1673,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,153.6,,,214.6495492,239.5070112,153.6,214.6495492,239.5070112,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1674,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,115.2,,,160.9871619,179.6302584,115.2,160.9871619,179.6302584,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1675,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniarres,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1676,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,384,,,536.623873,598.7675281,384,536.623873,598.7675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1677,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,166.4,,,232.5370116,259.4659288,166.4,232.5370116,259.4659288,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1678,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon Province,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1679,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus camaldulensis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,307.2,,,429.2990984,479.0140224,307.2,429.2990984,479.0140224,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1680,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,563.2,,,787.0483471,878.1923745,563.2,787.0483471,878.1923745,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1681,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1682,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1683,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pego,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1024,,,1430.996995,1596.713408,1024,1430.996995,1596.713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1685,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Genoves,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2777.6,,,3881.579348,4331.08512,2777.6,3881.579348,4331.08512,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1686,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jativa,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2201.6,,,3076.643539,3432.933827,2201.6,3076.643539,3432.933827,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1688,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,435.2,,,608.1737228,678.6031985,435.2,608.1737228,678.6031985,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1689,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Nymphaeaceae,Nymphaea,Nymphaea mexicana,,Mexican waterlily,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gaianes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1690,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1691,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Paulowniaceae,Paulownia,Paulownia tomentosa,,Princesstree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,166.4,,,232.5370116,259.4659288,166.4,232.5370116,259.4659288,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1692,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Salicaceae,Salix,Salix babylonica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,115.2,,,160.9871619,179.6302584,115.2,160.9871619,179.6302584,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1693,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia natans,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38.4,,,53.6623873,59.87675281,38.4,53.6623873,59.87675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1694,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Typhaceae,Typha,Typha domingensis,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Marshlands -  rivers - dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algemesi,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,435.2,,,608.1737228,678.6031985,435.2,608.1737228,678.6031985,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg.7-8-9, Marjales rios y ramblas",Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1695,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1696,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,4646.4,,,6493.148864,7245.087089,4646.4,6493.148864,7245.087089,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1697,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1698,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1699,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,819.2,,,1144.797596,1277.370727,819.2,1144.797596,1277.370727,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1700,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1075.2,,,1502.546845,1676.549079,1075.2,1502.546845,1676.549079,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1701,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave tequilana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1702,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1703,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,166.4,,,232.5370116,259.4659288,166.4,232.5370116,259.4659288,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1704,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1705,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1706,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1707,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,576,,,804.9358096,898.1512921,576,804.9358096,898.1512921,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1709,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1710,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,256,,,357.7492487,399.178352,256,357.7492487,399.178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1711,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,320,,,447.1865609,498.97294,320,447.1865609,498.97294,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1712,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,64,,,89.43731217,99.79458801,64,89.43731217,99.79458801,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1713,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1716,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1717,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38.4,,,53.6623873,59.87675281,38.4,53.6623873,59.87675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.9,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1718,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,89.6,,,125.212237,139.7124232,89.6,125.212237,139.7124232,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1719,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Callosa de Segura,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,435.2,,,608.1737228,678.6031985,435.2,608.1737228,678.6031985,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1720,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Pobla de Tornesa,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,268.8,,,375.6367111,419.1372696,268.8,375.6367111,419.1372696,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1721,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1722,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,153.6,,,214.6495492,239.5070112,153.6,214.6495492,239.5070112,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1723,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1724,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,691.2,,,965.9229715,1077.78155,691.2,965.9229715,1077.78155,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1725,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1726,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,960,,,1341.559683,1496.91882,960,1341.559683,1496.91882,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1727,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2252.8,,,3148.193388,3512.769498,2252.8,3148.193388,3512.769498,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1728,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave sisalana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1730,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave tequilana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,294.4,,,411.411636,459.0551048,294.4,411.411636,459.0551048,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1731,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3635.2,,,5080.039331,5668.332599,3635.2,5080.039331,5668.332599,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1732,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,640,,,894.3731217,997.9458801,640,894.3731217,997.9458801,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1733,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Belgida,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1734,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3097.6,,,4328.765909,4830.05806,3097.6,4328.765909,4830.05806,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1735,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,486.4,,,679.7235725,758.4388689,486.4,679.7235725,758.4388689,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1736,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1737,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,832,,,1162.685058,1297.329644,832,1162.685058,1297.329644,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1738,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chiva,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1739,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,166.4,,,232.5370116,259.4659288,166.4,232.5370116,259.4659288,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1740,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,934.4,,,1305.784758,1457.000985,934.4,1305.784758,1457.000985,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1741,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe maculata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1742,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe maculata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,166.4,,,232.5370116,259.4659288,166.4,232.5370116,259.4659288,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1744,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1745,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,Madeira-vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1746,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,Madeira-vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,64,,,89.43731217,99.79458801,64,89.43731217,99.79458801,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1747,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38.4,,,53.6623873,59.87675281,38.4,53.6623873,59.87675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1748,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,256,,,357.7492487,399.178352,256,357.7492487,399.178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1749,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Barig,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,153.6,,,214.6495492,239.5070112,153.6,214.6495492,239.5070112,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1750,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1894.4,,,2647.34444,2953.919805,1894.4,2647.34444,2953.919805,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1751,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1752,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia leptocaulis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1753,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia leptocaulis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lliria,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1754,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfondeguilla,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1755,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3456,,,4829.614857,5388.907752,3456,4829.614857,5388.907752,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1756,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,7360,,,10285.2909,11476.37762,7360,10285.2909,11476.37762,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1757,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1758,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcora,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1759,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,332.8,,,465.0740233,518.9318576,332.8,465.0740233,518.9318576,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1760,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,204.8,,,286.199399,319.3426816,204.8,286.199399,319.3426816,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1761,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1762,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1763,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2560,,,3577.492487,3991.78352,2560,3577.492487,3991.78352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1764,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,844.8,,,1180.572521,1317.288562,844.8,1180.572521,1317.288562,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1765,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1766,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,192,,,268.3119365,299.383764,192,268.3119365,299.383764,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1767,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1768,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1769,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuart de Poblet,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,230.4,,,321.9743238,359.2605168,230.4,321.9743238,359.2605168,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1770,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1771,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,256,,,357.7492487,399.178352,256,357.7492487,399.178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1772,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,601.6,,,840.7107344,938.0691273,601.6,840.7107344,938.0691273,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1773,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,Eve's pin,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,64,,,89.43731217,99.79458801,64,89.43731217,99.79458801,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12. Original name is a synonym (Cylindropuntia subulata),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1775,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1776,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Albalat dels Tarongers,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1777,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfondeguilla,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,460.8,,,643.9486476,718.5210337,460.8,643.9486476,718.5210337,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1778,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,89.6,,,125.212237,139.7124232,89.6,125.212237,139.7124232,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1779,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38.4,,,53.6623873,59.87675281,38.4,53.6623873,59.87675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1780,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,345.6,,,482.9614857,538.8907752,345.6,482.9614857,538.8907752,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1781,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chovar,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1782,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Llombay,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1783,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,64,,,89.43731217,99.79458801,64,89.43731217,99.79458801,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1784,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Soneja,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38.4,,,53.6623873,59.87675281,38.4,53.6623873,59.87675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1785,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1920,,,2683.119365,2993.83764,1920,2683.119365,2993.83764,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1786,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1787,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,243.2,,,339.8617863,379.2194344,243.2,339.8617863,379.2194344,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1788,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chovar,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,332.8,,,465.0740233,518.9318576,332.8,465.0740233,518.9318576,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1790,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Geraniales,Geraniaceae,Pelargonium,Pelargonium capitatum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38.4,,,53.6623873,59.87675281,38.4,53.6623873,59.87675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1794,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1676.8,,,2343.257579,2614.618206,1676.8,2343.257579,2614.618206,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1795,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1796,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1797,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Pobla de Tornesa,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,281.6,,,393.5241736,439.0961872,281.6,393.5241736,439.0961872,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1798,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,998.4,,,1395.22207,1556.795573,998.4,1395.22207,1556.795573,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1799,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1254.4,,,1752.971319,1955.973925,1254.4,1752.971319,1955.973925,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1800,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.10-11-12,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1801,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,102.4,,,143.0996995,159.6713408,102.4,143.0996995,159.6713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1803,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1804,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1805,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea diffusa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jarafuel,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1806,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Aielo de Rugat,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1807,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Fontanares de Alforin,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1808,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lugar nuevo de San Jeronimo,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,422.4,,,590.2862603,658.6442809,422.4,590.2862603,658.6442809,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1809,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1971.2,,,2754.669215,3073.673311,1971.2,2754.669215,3073.673311,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1810,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Terrateig,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,524.8,,,733.3859598,818.3156217,524.8,733.3859598,818.3156217,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1811,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,512,,,715.4984974,798.3567041,512,715.4984974,798.3567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1812,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1813,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1814,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,460.8,,,643.9486476,718.5210337,460.8,643.9486476,718.5210337,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1815,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,89.6,,,125.212237,139.7124232,89.6,125.212237,139.7124232,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1816,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,921.6,,,1287.897295,1437.042067,921.6,1287.897295,1437.042067,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1817,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chiva,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1818,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Estivella,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1819,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1820,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Mogente,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1024,,,1430.996995,1596.713408,1024,1430.996995,1596.713408,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1821,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Moncada,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1822,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1823,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Naquera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1824,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Rocafort,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1825,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tibi,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,89.6,,,125.212237,139.7124232,89.6,125.212237,139.7124232,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1826,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,Cylindropuntia rosea,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,768,,,1073.247746,1197.535056,768,1073.247746,1197.535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1828,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38.4,,,53.6623873,59.87675281,38.4,53.6623873,59.87675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1829,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcasser,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,832,,,1162.685058,1297.329644,832,1162.685058,1297.329644,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1830,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,409.6,,,572.3987979,638.6853633,409.6,572.3987979,638.6853633,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1831,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2944,,,4114.11636,4590.551048,2944,4114.11636,4590.551048,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1832,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1833,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Massamagrell,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,307.2,,,429.2990984,479.0140224,307.2,429.2990984,479.0140224,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1834,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Moncada,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25.6,,,35.77492487,39.9178352,25.6,35.77492487,39.9178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1835,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,7680,,,10732.47746,11975.35056,7680,10732.47746,11975.35056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1836,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,204.8,,,286.199399,319.3426816,204.8,286.199399,319.3426816,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1837,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12.8,,,17.88746243,19.9589176,12.8,17.88746243,19.9589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1838,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuart de Poblet,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,230.4,,,321.9743238,359.2605168,230.4,321.9743238,359.2605168,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1839,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,832,,,1162.685058,1297.329644,832,1162.685058,1297.329644,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1840,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Carcaixent,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1841,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1152,,,1609.871619,1796.302584,1152,1609.871619,1796.302584,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1842,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1843,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38.4,,,53.6623873,59.87675281,38.4,53.6623873,59.87675281,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1844,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3059.2,,,4275.103522,4770.181307,3059.2,4275.103522,4770.181307,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1845,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Antonio de Benageber,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1846,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Silla,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1847,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tavernes de la Valldigna,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1433.6,,,2003.395793,2235.398771,1433.6,2003.395793,2235.398771,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1848,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1561.6,,,2182.270417,2434.987947,1561.6,2182.270417,2434.987947,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1849,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,crimson fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chirivella,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,435.2,,,608.1737228,678.6031985,435.2,608.1737228,678.6031985,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1851,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,76.8,,,107.3247746,119.7535056,76.8,107.3247746,119.7535056,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1852,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51.2,,,71.54984974,79.83567041,51.2,71.54984974,79.83567041,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1853,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Foyos,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,128,,,178.8746243,199.589176,128,178.8746243,199.589176,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1854,TC,SP_28,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2013,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2014,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,256,,,357.7492487,399.178352,256,357.7492487,399.178352,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg.13-14,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE1861,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,1280,,,2143.282306,2007.635404,1280,2143.282306,2007.635404,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1862,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,10752,,,18003.57137,16864.13739,10752,18003.57137,16864.13739,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1863,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,5120,,,8573.129223,8030.541615,5120,8573.129223,8030.541615,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1864,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,36608,,,61297.87394,57418.37255,36608,61297.87394,57418.37255,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1865,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe vera,,Aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,8576,,,14359.99145,13451.15721,8576,14359.99145,13451.15721,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1866,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,6144,,,10287.75507,9636.649938,6144,10287.75507,9636.649938,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1867,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfafar/Albufera de Valencia Park,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,11264,,,17950.43236,17911.07818,11264,17950.43236,17911.07818,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 12,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1868,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tancat de la Pipa/ Albufera de Valencia Park,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2560,,,4079.643718,4070.699586,2560,4079.643718,4070.699586,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 12,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1869,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Grao de Castellon,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,5120,,,8159.287437,8141.399171,5120,8159.287437,8141.399171,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1870,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marshlands,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Grao de Castellon,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,8960,,,14278.75301,14247.44855,8960,14278.75301,14247.44855,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1871,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Marjal de Almenara Protected area,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6656,,,10607.07367,10583.81892,6656,10607.07367,10583.81892,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1872,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River,9,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,River Verd,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,36864,,,58746.86954,58618.07403,36864,58746.86954,58618.07403,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Pg13-4. FAEDER funds for experience to control,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1873,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,17152,,,27333.61291,27273.68722,17152,27333.61291,27273.68722,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 3 y Pag 8 ambientes ruderales, badíos",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1874,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,16768,,,26721.66635,26663.08229,16768,26721.66635,26663.08229,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1875,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,12800,,,20398.21859,20353.49793,12800,20398.21859,20353.49793,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1877,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2944,,,4691.590276,4681.304523,2944,4691.590276,4681.304523,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1878,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2688,,,4283.625904,4274.234565,2688,4283.625904,4274.234565,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1879,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2304,,,3671.679346,3663.629627,2304,3671.679346,3663.629627,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 3,Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1880,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe vera,,Aloe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,384,,,611.9465577,610.6049378,384,611.9465577,610.6049378,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1881,TC,SP_55,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2009,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería de Medi Ambient Aigua- Urbanisme i habitatge- Dirección General de Gestión del Medio Natural- Servicio de Biodiversidad,NA,2010,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia Autonomous Region,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,768,,,1223.893115,1221.209876,768,1223.893115,1221.209876,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 3,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1884,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1885,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,812.8,,,936.9929913,1224.689597,812.8,936.9929913,1224.689597,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1886,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia karroo,,Karroothorn,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,640,,,737.7897569,964.3225175,640,737.7897569,964.3225175,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1888,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,115.2,,,132.8021562,173.5780531,115.2,132.8021562,173.5780531,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1889,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1890,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tavernes de la Valldigna,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,806.4,,,929.6150937,1215.046372,806.4,929.6150937,1215.046372,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1891,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3238.4,,,3733.21617,4879.471938,3238.4,3733.21617,4879.471938,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1892,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,51.2,,,59.02318055,77.1458014,51.2,59.02318055,77.1458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1894,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe microstigma,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,153.6,,,177.0695417,231.4374042,153.6,177.0695417,231.4374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas. Synonym of  Aloe saponaria,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1895,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Arctotheca,Arctotheca calendula,,Espumilla,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1896,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,153.6,,,177.0695417,231.4374042,153.6,177.0695417,231.4374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1897,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,204.8,,,236.0927222,308.5832056,204.8,236.0927222,308.5832056,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1898,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1152,,,1328.021562,1735.780531,1152,1328.021562,1735.780531,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1899,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1900,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,79.36,,,91.48592986,119.5759922,79.36,91.48592986,119.5759922,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1901,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1902,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4211.2,,,4854.6566,6345.242165,4211.2,4854.6566,6345.242165,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg 9. Dunas marítimas, Pg 20 LIC protected area, 72 m3",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1903,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,403.2,,,464.8075469,607.523186,403.2,464.8075469,607.523186,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1904,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5721.6,,,6595.840427,8621.043306,5721.6,6595.840427,8621.043306,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1905,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,921.6,,,1062.41725,1388.624425,921.6,1062.41725,1388.624425,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1907,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,25.6,,,29.51159028,38.5729007,25.6,29.51159028,38.5729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1908,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,153.6,,,177.0695417,231.4374042,153.6,177.0695417,231.4374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1909,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1910,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Kalanchoe,Kalanchoe daigremontiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,563.2,,,649.2549861,848.6038154,563.2,649.2549861,848.6038154,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1911,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,25.6,,,29.51159028,38.5729007,25.6,29.51159028,38.5729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1912,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,230.4,,,265.6043125,347.1561063,230.4,265.6043125,347.1561063,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1913,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,352,,,405.7843663,530.3773846,352,405.7843663,530.3773846,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1914,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1915,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1916,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,89.6,,,103.290566,135.0051524,89.6,103.290566,135.0051524,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1917,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,179.2,,,206.5811319,270.0103049,179.2,206.5811319,270.0103049,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1918,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1919,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1920,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,115.2,,,132.8021562,173.5780531,115.2,132.8021562,173.5780531,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1921,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1922,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1923,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,24.32,,,28.03601076,36.64425566,24.32,28.03601076,36.64425566,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1924,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1925,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1926,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,70.4,,,81.15687326,106.0754769,70.4,81.15687326,106.0754769,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1927,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Phoenix,Phoenix canariensis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,51.2,,,59.02318055,77.1458014,51.2,59.02318055,77.1458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1928,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,51.2,,,59.02318055,77.1458014,51.2,59.02318055,77.1458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1929,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum linnaeanum,,Sodom-apple,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1930,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia robusta,,Mexican fan palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,25.6,,,29.51159028,38.5729007,25.6,29.51159028,38.5729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1931,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia robusta,,Mexican fan palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,58.88,,,67.87665764,88.71767161,58.88,67.87665764,88.71767161,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1932,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium orientale,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,61.44,,,70.82781666,92.57496168,61.44,70.82781666,92.57496168,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1933,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium orientale,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,568.32,,,655.1573041,856.3183955,568.32,655.1573041,856.3183955,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1934,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium orientale,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1935,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium spinosum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,66.56,,,76.73013472,100.2895418,66.56,76.73013472,100.2895418,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1936,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,5,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,204.8,,,236.0927222,308.5832056,204.8,236.0927222,308.5832056,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg 9. Dunas marítimas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1938,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1939,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,326.4,,,376.272776,491.8044839,326.4,376.272776,491.8044839,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1940,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,25.6,,,29.51159028,38.5729007,25.6,29.51159028,38.5729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1944,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,25.6,,,29.51159028,38.5729007,25.6,29.51159028,38.5729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1945,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3776,,,4352.959566,5689.502853,3776,4352.959566,5689.502853,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1946,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,257.28,,,296.5914823,387.657652,257.28,296.5914823,387.657652,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1947,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,57.6,,,66.40107812,86.78902657,57.6,66.40107812,86.78902657,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1948,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3450.88,,,3978.162369,5199.627014,3450.88,3978.162369,5199.627014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1949,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,664.32,,,765.8257677,1000.966773,664.32,765.8257677,1000.966773,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1950,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,115.2,,,132.8021562,173.5780531,115.2,132.8021562,173.5780531,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1951,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1952,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcalali,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1454.08,,,1676.258328,2190.94076,1454.08,1676.258328,2190.94076,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1953,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,384,,,442.6738541,578.5935105,384,442.6738541,578.5935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1954,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,332.8,,,383.6506736,501.4477091,332.8,383.6506736,501.4477091,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1955,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,384,,,442.6738541,578.5935105,384,442.6738541,578.5935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1956,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bellus,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4736,,,5459.644201,7135.986629,4736,5459.644201,7135.986629,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1957,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benimodo,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3712,,,4279.18059,5593.070601,3712,4279.18059,5593.070601,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1958,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,96,,,110.6684635,144.6483776,96,110.6684635,144.6483776,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1959,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1960,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalance,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4134.4,,,4766.12183,6229.523463,4134.4,4766.12183,6229.523463,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1961,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,384,,,442.6738541,578.5935105,384,442.6738541,578.5935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1962,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Masalaves,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1536,,,1770.695417,2314.374042,1536,1770.695417,2314.374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1963,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,616.96,,,711.2293257,929.6069068,616.96,711.2293257,929.6069068,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1964,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1965,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Requena,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2713.6,,,3128.228569,4088.727474,2713.6,3128.228569,4088.727474,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1966,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,7475.2,,,8617.384361,11263.287,7475.2,8617.384361,11263.287,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1967,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1968,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,153.6,,,177.0695417,231.4374042,153.6,177.0695417,231.4374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1969,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2022.4,,,2331.415632,3047.259155,2022.4,2331.415632,3047.259155,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1970,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1971,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas. Pg 26, red natura 2000",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1972,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas. Pg 26, red natura 2000",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1973,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,409.6,,,472.1854444,617.1664112,409.6,472.1854444,617.1664112,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas. Pg 26, red natura 2000",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1974,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,409.6,,,472.1854444,617.1664112,409.6,472.1854444,617.1664112,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas. Pg 26, red natura 2000",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1975,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Cocoyam,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,896,,,1032.90566,1350.051524,896,1032.90566,1350.051524,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1976,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,230.4,,,265.6043125,347.1561063,230.4,265.6043125,347.1561063,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1977,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,800,,,922.2371961,1205.403147,800,922.2371961,1205.403147,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1978,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,57.6,,,66.40107812,86.78902657,57.6,66.40107812,86.78902657,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1979,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chilches,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1075.2,,,1239.486792,1620.061829,1075.2,1239.486792,1620.061829,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1980,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,230.4,,,265.6043125,347.1561063,230.4,265.6043125,347.1561063,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1981,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,256,,,295.1159028,385.729007,256,295.1159028,385.729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1982,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5632,,,6492.549861,8486.038154,5632,6492.549861,8486.038154,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1983,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Estivella,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1984,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Mogente,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1985,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,460.8,,,531.208625,694.3122126,460.8,531.208625,694.3122126,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1986,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,192,,,221.3369271,289.2967552,192,221.3369271,289.2967552,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1987,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pego,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas. Pg 27, 28 protected area Pego-Oliva",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1988,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,345.6,,,398.4064687,520.7341594,345.6,398.4064687,520.7341594,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1989,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Juan de Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,57.6,,,66.40107812,86.78902657,57.6,66.40107812,86.78902657,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1990,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,19.2,,,22.13369271,28.92967552,19.2,22.13369271,28.92967552,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1991,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,25.6,,,29.51159028,38.5729007,25.6,29.51159028,38.5729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1992,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1993,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1994,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sueca,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,896,,,1032.90566,1350.051524,896,1032.90566,1350.051524,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1995,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jaraco,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1996,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1433.6,,,1652.649055,2160.082439,1433.6,1652.649055,2160.082439,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1997,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,51.2,,,59.02318055,77.1458014,51.2,59.02318055,77.1458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1998,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Genoves,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1664,,,1918.253368,2507.238545,1664,1918.253368,2507.238545,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE1999,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jativa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1792,,,2065.811319,2700.103049,1792,2065.811319,2700.103049,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2000,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,384,,,442.6738541,578.5935105,384,442.6738541,578.5935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2001,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1484.8,,,1711.672236,2237.22824,1484.8,1711.672236,2237.22824,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2002,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,64,,,73.77897569,96.43225175,64,73.77897569,96.43225175,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2003,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,213.76,,,246.4217788,322.0837208,213.76,246.4217788,322.0837208,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2004,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2005,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2006,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1420.8,,,1637.89326,2140.795989,1420.8,1637.89326,2140.795989,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2007,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1945.6,,,2242.880861,2931.540453,1945.6,2242.880861,2931.540453,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2008,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,57.6,,,66.40107812,86.78902657,57.6,66.40107812,86.78902657,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2009,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1280,,,1475.579514,1928.645035,1280,1475.579514,1928.645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2010,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,76.8,,,88.53477083,115.7187021,76.8,88.53477083,115.7187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2011,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,345.6,,,398.4064687,520.7341594,345.6,398.4064687,520.7341594,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2012,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia robusta,,Mexican fan palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,108.8,,,125.4242587,163.934828,108.8,125.4242587,163.934828,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2013,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium orientale,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,10,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sinarcas,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,256,,,295.1159028,385.729007,256,295.1159028,385.729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 11. Marjales, ríos y ramblas",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2014,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium spinosum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sinarcas,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1024,,,1180.463611,1542.916028,1024,1180.463611,1542.916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2015,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,998.4,,,1150.952021,1504.343127,998.4,1150.952021,1504.343127,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2016,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2017,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2476.8,,,2855.246359,3731.928143,2476.8,2855.246359,3731.928143,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2018,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,87.04,,,100.3394069,131.1478624,87.04,100.3394069,131.1478624,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2021,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,96,,,110.6684635,144.6483776,96,110.6684635,144.6483776,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2022,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2023,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,192,,,221.3369271,289.2967552,192,221.3369271,289.2967552,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2024,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2026,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5.12,,,5.902318055,7.71458014,5.12,5.902318055,7.71458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2027,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Kalanchoe,Kalanchoe daigremontiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,96,,,110.6684635,144.6483776,96,110.6684635,144.6483776,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2028,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,89.6,,,103.290566,135.0051524,89.6,103.290566,135.0051524,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2029,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,299.52,,,345.2856062,451.3029382,299.52,345.2856062,451.3029382,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2030,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1052.16,,,1212.92636,1585.346219,1052.16,1212.92636,1585.346219,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2031,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2032,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Nyctaginaceae,Mirabilis,Mirabilis jalapa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,177.92,,,205.1055524,268.0816599,177.92,205.1055524,268.0816599,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2033,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,76.8,,,88.53477083,115.7187021,76.8,88.53477083,115.7187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2034,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,678.4,,,782.0571423,1022.181868,678.4,782.0571423,1022.181868,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2035,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1088,,,1254.242587,1639.34828,1088,1254.242587,1639.34828,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2037,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,134.4,,,154.935849,202.5077287,134.4,154.935849,202.5077287,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2041,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2042,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,582.4,,,671.3886788,877.5334909,582.4,671.3886788,877.5334909,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2043,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 13. Acantilados marinos y continentales,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2044,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2045,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2046,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2047,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,57.6,,,66.40107812,86.78902657,57.6,66.40107812,86.78902657,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2048,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Callosa del Segura,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,723.2,,,833.7024253,1089.684445,723.2,833.7024253,1089.684445,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2052,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,614.4,,,708.2781666,925.7496168,614.4,708.2781666,925.7496168,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2053,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,134.4,,,154.935849,202.5077287,134.4,154.935849,202.5077287,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2054,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2055,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,115.2,,,132.8021562,173.5780531,115.2,132.8021562,173.5780531,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2056,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5216,,,6012.986519,7859.228517,5216,6012.986519,7859.228517,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2057,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,256,,,295.1159028,385.729007,256,295.1159028,385.729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2058,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Belgida,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1510.4,,,1741.183826,2275.801141,1510.4,1741.183826,2275.801141,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2059,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2380.8,,,2744.577896,3587.279765,2380.8,2744.577896,3587.279765,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2060,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1141.76,,,1316.216926,1720.351371,1141.76,1316.216926,1720.351371,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2061,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,384,,,442.6738541,578.5935105,384,442.6738541,578.5935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2062,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chovar,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,76.8,,,88.53477083,115.7187021,76.8,88.53477083,115.7187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2063,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,76.8,,,88.53477083,115.7187021,76.8,88.53477083,115.7187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2065,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1024,,,1180.463611,1542.916028,1024,1180.463611,1542.916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2066,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pueblo Nuevo de Benitachell,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,115.2,,,132.8021562,173.5780531,115.2,132.8021562,173.5780531,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2067,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Requena,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1024,,,1180.463611,1542.916028,1024,1180.463611,1542.916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2068,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2069,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfondeguilla,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,76.8,,,88.53477083,115.7187021,76.8,88.53477083,115.7187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2070,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,76.8,,,88.53477083,115.7187021,76.8,88.53477083,115.7187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2071,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vilavella,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2072,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,153.6,,,177.0695417,231.4374042,153.6,177.0695417,231.4374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2073,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas, Pg 20 PN Salinas de Santa Pola, Zona del Pinet",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2074,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,168.96,,,194.7764958,254.5811446,168.96,194.7764958,254.5811446,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2075,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2076,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Borriol,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2077,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,358.4,,,413.1622639,540.0206098,358.4,413.1622639,540.0206098,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2078,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,76.8,,,88.53477083,115.7187021,76.8,88.53477083,115.7187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2079,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gilet,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,153.6,,,177.0695417,231.4374042,153.6,177.0695417,231.4374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2080,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,204.8,,,236.0927222,308.5832056,204.8,236.0927222,308.5832056,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2081,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,341.76,,,393.9797302,514.9482243,341.76,393.9797302,514.9482243,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2082,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benasau,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,204.8,,,236.0927222,308.5832056,204.8,236.0927222,308.5832056,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2083,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,588.8,,,678.7665764,887.1767161,588.8,678.7665764,887.1767161,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2084,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,256,,,295.1159028,385.729007,256,295.1159028,385.729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2085,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3840,,,4426.738541,5785.935105,3840,4426.738541,5785.935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2086,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bunol,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2087,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,192,,,221.3369271,289.2967552,192,221.3369271,289.2967552,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2088,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Confrides,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2089,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cox,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2090,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,204.8,,,236.0927222,308.5832056,204.8,236.0927222,308.5832056,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2091,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,427.52,,,492.8435576,644.1674417,427.52,492.8435576,644.1674417,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2092,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2093,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2278.4,,,2626.531535,3432.988162,2278.4,2626.531535,3432.988162,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2094,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1440,,,1660.026953,2169.725664,1440,1660.026953,2169.725664,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2095,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalance,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2096,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lliria,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1408,,,1623.137465,2121.509538,1408,1623.137465,2121.509538,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2097,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2098,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2099,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Naquera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2100,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Olocau,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,102.4,,,118.0463611,154.2916028,102.4,118.0463611,154.2916028,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2101,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,384,,,442.6738541,578.5935105,384,442.6738541,578.5935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2102,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,230.4,,,265.6043125,347.1561063,230.4,265.6043125,347.1561063,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2103,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Picassent,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,1817.6,,,2095.32291,2738.67595,1817.6,2095.32291,2738.67595,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2104,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,51.2,,,59.02318055,77.1458014,51.2,59.02318055,77.1458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2105,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,409.6,,,472.1854444,617.1664112,409.6,472.1854444,617.1664112,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2106,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,595.2,,,686.1444739,896.8199412,595.2,686.1444739,896.8199412,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2107,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tibi,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,96,,,110.6684635,144.6483776,96,110.6684635,144.6483776,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2108,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3072,,,3541.390833,4628.748084,3072,3541.390833,4628.748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2109,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Yatova,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2111,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Kalanchoe,Kalanchoe daigremontiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Soneja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,256,,,295.1159028,385.729007,256,295.1159028,385.729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2112,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,76.8,,,88.53477083,115.7187021,76.8,88.53477083,115.7187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2113,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pueblo Nuevo de Benitachell,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2114,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2115,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,486.4,,,560.7202152,732.8851133,486.4,560.7202152,732.8851133,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2116,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,51.2,,,59.02318055,77.1458014,51.2,59.02318055,77.1458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2117,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,256,,,295.1159028,385.729007,256,295.1159028,385.729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2118,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,38.4,,,44.26738541,57.85935105,38.4,44.26738541,57.85935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2119,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villena,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,179.2,,,206.5811319,270.0103049,179.2,206.5811319,270.0103049,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2120,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfondeguilla,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3302.4,,,3806.995146,4975.90419,3302.4,3806.995146,4975.90419,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2121,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,819.2,,,944.3708888,1234.332822,819.2,944.3708888,1234.332822,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2122,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chovar,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2412.8,,,2781.467384,3635.495891,2412.8,2781.467384,3635.495891,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2123,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puzol,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2125,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,153.6,,,177.0695417,231.4374042,153.6,177.0695417,231.4374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2129,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,499.2,,,575.4760104,752.1715636,499.2,575.4760104,752.1715636,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2130,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,665.6,,,767.3013472,1002.895418,665.6,767.3013472,1002.895418,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2131,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,35.84,,,41.31622639,54.00206098,35.84,41.31622639,54.00206098,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2132,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,332.8,,,383.6506736,501.4477091,332.8,383.6506736,501.4477091,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2133,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,281.6,,,324.627493,424.3019077,281.6,324.627493,424.3019077,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2134,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Pobla de Benifassa,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,665.6,,,767.3013472,1002.895418,665.6,767.3013472,1002.895418,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2135,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Gallinera,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,435.2,,,501.6970347,655.7393119,435.2,501.6970347,655.7393119,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2136,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,2\3,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 14. Matorrales y fomaciones boscosas,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2138,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,992,,,1143.574123,1494.699902,992,1143.574123,1494.699902,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2139,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Biar,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,153.6,,,177.0695417,231.4374042,153.6,177.0695417,231.4374042,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2140,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2141,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villavieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,307.2,,,354.1390833,462.8748084,307.2,354.1390833,462.8748084,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2142,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,409.6,,,472.1854444,617.1664112,409.6,472.1854444,617.1664112,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2143,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2144,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ayora,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,512,,,590.2318055,771.458014,512,590.2318055,771.458014,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2145,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2146,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Biar,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,537.6,,,619.7433958,810.0309147,537.6,619.7433958,810.0309147,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2147,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,480,,,553.3423177,723.2418881,480,553.3423177,723.2418881,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2148,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cocentaina,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,256,,,295.1159028,385.729007,256,295.1159028,385.729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2149,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Crevillent,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,126.72,,,146.0823719,190.9358585,126.72,146.0823719,190.9358585,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2150,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,382.72,,,441.1982746,576.6648654,382.72,441.1982746,576.6648654,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2151,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,281.6,,,324.627493,424.3019077,281.6,324.627493,424.3019077,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2152,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,256,,,295.1159028,385.729007,256,295.1159028,385.729007,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2153,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,384,,,442.6738541,578.5935105,384,442.6738541,578.5935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2154,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,128,,,147.5579514,192.8645035,128,147.5579514,192.8645035,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2155,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Juan de Alicante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,268.8,,,309.8716979,405.0154573,268.8,309.8716979,405.0154573,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2156,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,358.4,,,413.1622639,540.0206098,358.4,413.1622639,540.0206098,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2157,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,768,,,885.3477083,1157.187021,768,885.3477083,1157.187021,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2158,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ador,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,96,,,110.6684635,144.6483776,96,110.6684635,144.6483776,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2159,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almoines,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,384,,,442.6738541,578.5935105,384,442.6738541,578.5935105,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2160,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,57.6,,,66.40107812,86.78902657,57.6,66.40107812,86.78902657,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2161,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,230.4,,,265.6043125,347.1561063,230.4,265.6043125,347.1561063,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2162,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,166.4,,,191.8253368,250.7238545,166.4,191.8253368,250.7238545,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2165,TC,SP_56,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2018,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Agricultura- Desenvolupament Rural- Emergència Climàtica i Transició Ecològica- Direcció General de Medi Natural i d'Avaluació Ambiental- Servei de Vida Silvestre,NA,2019,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wasteland,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,115.2,,,132.8021562,173.5780531,115.2,132.8021562,173.5780531,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pg. 17. Baldíos,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE2167,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3097.6,,,3554.317345,4820.458453,3097.6,3554.317345,4820.458453,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2170,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2171,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,332.8,,,381.8688056,517.9004949,332.8,381.8688056,517.9004949,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2172,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2173,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,128,,,146.8726176,199.192498,128,146.8726176,199.192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2176,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,Heartleaf iceplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Species name in the document is a synonim; original name in the doc =  Aptenia cordifolia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2177,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,281.6,,,323.1197586,438.2234957,281.6,323.1197586,438.2234957,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2178,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,8582.4,,,9847.809007,13355.85699,8582.4,9847.809007,13355.85699,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2179,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,102.4,,,117.498094,159.3539984,102.4,117.498094,159.3539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Original name of the species in the document = Boussingaultia cordifolia.,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2180,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,15.36,,,17.62471411,23.90309977,15.36,17.62471411,23.90309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2181,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,576,,,660.926779,896.3662412,576,660.926779,896.3662412,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2182,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1401.6,,,1608.255162,2181.157854,1401.6,1608.255162,2181.157854,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2183,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,5625.6,,,6455.051541,8754.510289,5625.6,6455.051541,8754.510289,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2184,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2185,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2304,,,2643.707116,3585.464965,2304,2643.707116,3585.464965,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2186,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,115.2,,,132.1853558,179.2732482,115.2,132.1853558,179.2732482,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2187,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Drosanthemum,Drosanthemum floribundum,,Pale dewplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Daimus,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2112,,,2423.39819,3286.676218,2112,2423.39819,3286.676218,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2192,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2193,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,76.8,,,88.12357053,119.5154988,76.8,88.12357053,119.5154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2194,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2195,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,294.4,,,337.8070204,458.1427455,294.4,337.8070204,458.1427455,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2200,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Dunes of Guardamar,Unit (30.98 ha),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,46848,,,53755.37802,72904.45429,46848,53755.37802,72904.45429,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2202,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,204.8,,,234.9961881,318.7079969,204.8,234.9961881,318.7079969,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2203,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pego,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,640,,,734.3630878,995.9624902,640,734.3630878,995.9624902,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2204,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,192,,,220.3089263,298.7887471,192,220.3089263,298.7887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2205,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,115.2,,,132.1853558,179.2732482,115.2,132.1853558,179.2732482,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2206,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,192,,,220.3089263,298.7887471,192,220.3089263,298.7887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2207,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,102.4,,,117.498094,159.3539984,102.4,117.498094,159.3539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2208,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,710.4,,,815.1430274,1105.518364,710.4,815.1430274,1105.518364,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2209,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,870.4,,,998.7337993,1354.508987,870.4,998.7337993,1354.508987,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2210,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,71.68,,,82.24866583,111.5477989,71.68,82.24866583,111.5477989,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2211,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,96,,,110.1544632,149.3943735,96,110.1544632,149.3943735,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2212,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2213,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,819.2,,,939.9847523,1274.831988,819.2,939.9847523,1274.831988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2214,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,691.2,,,793.1121348,1075.639489,691.2,793.1121348,1075.639489,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2215,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe vera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canet lo Roig,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,38.4,,,44.06178527,59.75774941,38.4,44.06178527,59.75774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2216,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,Heartleaf iceplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,38.4,,,44.06178527,59.75774941,38.4,44.06178527,59.75774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Species name in the document is a synonim; original name in the doc =  Aptenia cordifolia",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2217,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,Heartleaf iceplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Species name in the document is a synonim; original name in the doc =  Aptenia cordifolia",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2218,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Araujia,Araujia sericifera,,Cape-dandelion,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,76.8,,,88.12357053,119.5154988,76.8,88.12357053,119.5154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2219,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2220,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,19.2,,,22.03089263,29.87887471,19.2,22.03089263,29.87887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2221,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,102.4,,,117.498094,159.3539984,102.4,117.498094,159.3539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2222,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,192,,,220.3089263,298.7887471,192,220.3089263,298.7887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2223,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Llosa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2224,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,89.6,,,102.8108323,139.4347486,89.6,102.8108323,139.4347486,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2225,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,275.2,,,315.7761277,428.2638708,275.2,315.7761277,428.2638708,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2226,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2227,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1536,,,1762.471411,2390.309977,1536,1762.471411,2390.309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2228,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,307.2,,,352.4942821,478.0619953,307.2,352.4942821,478.0619953,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2229,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2230,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villanueva de Alcolea,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,102.4,,,117.498094,159.3539984,102.4,117.498094,159.3539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2231,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,819.2,,,939.9847523,1274.831988,819.2,939.9847523,1274.831988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2232,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Haworthiopsis,Haworthiopsis attenuata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,19.2,,,22.03089263,29.87887471,19.2,22.03089263,29.87887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Synonym of Aloe subulata",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2233,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,889.6,,,1020.764692,1384.387861,889.6,1020.764692,1384.387861,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2234,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2235,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,345.6,,,396.5560674,537.8197447,345.6,396.5560674,537.8197447,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2236,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chilches,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2237,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Llosa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2238,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,652.8,,,749.0503495,1015.88174,652.8,749.0503495,1015.88174,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2239,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,19.2,,,22.03089263,29.87887471,19.2,22.03089263,29.87887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Original name of the species in the document = Boussingaultia cordifolia.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2240,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Original name of the species in the document = Boussingaultia cordifolia.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2241,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,253.44,,,290.8077828,394.4011461,253.44,290.8077828,394.4011461,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2242,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Cocoyam,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almazora,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2243,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Cocoyam,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,838.4,,,962.015645,1304.710862,838.4,962.015645,1304.710862,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2244,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Cocoyam,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,896,,,1028.108323,1394.347486,896,1028.108323,1394.347486,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2245,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1107.2,,,1270.448142,1723.015108,1107.2,1270.448142,1723.015108,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2246,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2247,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,204.8,,,234.9961881,318.7079969,204.8,234.9961881,318.7079969,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2248,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chilches,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1536,,,1762.471411,2390.309977,1536,1762.471411,2390.309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2249,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pego,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,76.8,,,88.12357053,119.5154988,76.8,88.12357053,119.5154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2250,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,460.8,,,528.7414232,717.092993,460.8,528.7414232,717.092993,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2251,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3712,,,4259.305909,5776.582443,3712,4259.305909,5776.582443,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2252,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Estivella,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,640,,,734.3630878,995.9624902,640,734.3630878,995.9624902,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2253,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,192,,,220.3089263,298.7887471,192,220.3089263,298.7887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2254,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2255,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Mogente,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2256,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Moncada,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,640,,,734.3630878,995.9624902,640,734.3630878,995.9624902,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2257,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Naquera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2258,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2259,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2260,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2261,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Balsaminaceae,Impatiens,Impatiens balfourii,,Balfour's touch-me-not,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2262,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,White leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,5350.4,,,6139.275414,8326.246418,5350.4,6139.275414,8326.246418,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2263,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,White leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pego,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1305.6,,,1498.100699,2031.76348,1305.6,1498.100699,2031.76348,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2264,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,30.72,,,35.24942821,47.80619953,30.72,35.24942821,47.80619953,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2265,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sant Jordi,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,15.36,,,17.62471411,23.90309977,15.36,17.62471411,23.90309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2266,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Moraceae,Morus,Morus nigra,,Black Mulberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sant Jordi,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,10.24,,,11.7498094,15.93539984,10.24,11.7498094,15.93539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2267,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2268,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bellus,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,672,,,771.0812421,1045.760615,672,771.0812421,1045.760615,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2269,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Genoves,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2118.4,,,2430.74182,3296.635843,2118.4,2430.74182,3296.635843,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2270,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jativa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1561.6,,,1791.845934,2430.148476,1561.6,1791.845934,2430.148476,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2271,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,186.88,,,214.4340216,290.8210472,186.88,214.4340216,290.8210472,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2272,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2273,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Nymphaeaceae,Nymphaea,Nymphaea mexicana,,Mexican waterlily,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gaianes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,102.4,,,117.498094,159.3539984,102.4,117.498094,159.3539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2274,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,19.2,,,22.03089263,29.87887471,19.2,22.03089263,29.87887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2275,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Borriol,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2276,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2278,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,5.12,,,5.874904702,7.967699922,5.12,5.874904702,7.967699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2279,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2280,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,678.4,,,778.424873,1055.72024,678.4,778.424873,1055.72024,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2281,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Fuentes de Ayodar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,422.4,,,484.6796379,657.3352436,422.4,484.6796379,657.3352436,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2282,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,102.4,,,117.498094,159.3539984,102.4,117.498094,159.3539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2283,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2284,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2285,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Salicaceae,Salix,Salix babylonica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,230.4,,,264.3707116,358.5464965,230.4,264.3707116,358.5464965,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2287,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia filifera,,American cotton palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chilches,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,64,,,73.43630878,99.59624902,64,73.43630878,99.59624902,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2288,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia filifera,,American cotton palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sant Jordi,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2289,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,76.8,,,88.12357053,119.5154988,76.8,88.12357053,119.5154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2290,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2291,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2292,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1459.2,,,1674.34784,2270.794478,1459.2,1674.34784,2270.794478,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2293,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave sisalana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2294,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,128,,,146.8726176,199.192498,128,146.8726176,199.192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2295,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,537.6,,,616.8649937,836.6084918,537.6,616.8649937,836.6084918,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2296,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2297,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,140.8,,,161.5598793,219.1117479,140.8,161.5598793,219.1117479,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2298,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2299,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2300,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Nyctaginaceae,Mirabilis,Mirabilis jalapa,,Marvel of peru,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2301,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2305,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,435.2,,,499.3668997,677.2544934,435.2,499.3668997,677.2544934,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2306,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,38.4,,,44.06178527,59.75774941,38.4,44.06178527,59.75774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2307,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2308,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla de Benifasar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,128,,,146.8726176,199.192498,128,146.8726176,199.192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2309,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,Cape-Ivy,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2726.4,,,3128.386754,4242.800208,2726.4,3128.386754,4242.800208,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2310,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Jacobea,Jacobaea maritima,,Silver Ragwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Original name in document is a synomym = Senecio cineraria.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2311,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2313,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benitachell,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,307.2,,,352.4942821,478.0619953,307.2,352.4942821,478.0619953,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2314,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,204.8,,,234.9961881,318.7079969,204.8,234.9961881,318.7079969,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2315,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Javea,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2316,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Callosa de Segura,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,230.4,,,264.3707116,358.5464965,230.4,264.3707116,358.5464965,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2317,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,204.8,,,234.9961881,318.7079969,204.8,234.9961881,318.7079969,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2319,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,128,,,146.8726176,199.192498,128,146.8726176,199.192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2320,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canet lo Roig,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2321,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,102.4,,,117.498094,159.3539984,102.4,117.498094,159.3539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2323,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave tequilana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2324,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,563.2,,,646.2395172,876.4469914,563.2,646.2395172,876.4469914,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2325,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,2585.6,,,2966.826875,4023.688461,2585.6,2966.826875,4023.688461,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2326,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,230.4,,,264.3707116,358.5464965,230.4,264.3707116,358.5464965,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2327,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1728,,,1982.780337,2689.098724,1728,1982.780337,2689.098724,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2328,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2329,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benitachell,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2330,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,460.8,,,528.7414232,717.092993,460.8,528.7414232,717.092993,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2331,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,307.2,,,352.4942821,478.0619953,307.2,352.4942821,478.0619953,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2332,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Carricola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2333,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,294.4,,,337.8070204,458.1427455,294.4,337.8070204,458.1427455,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2334,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,601.6,,,690.3013025,936.2047408,601.6,690.3013025,936.2047408,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2335,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe maculata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canet lo Roig,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2336,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Haworthiopsis,Haworthiopsis attenuata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Borriol,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,128,,,146.8726176,199.192498,128,146.8726176,199.192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Synonym of Aloe subulata,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2337,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,281.6,,,323.1197586,438.2234957,281.6,323.1197586,438.2234957,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2338,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,435.2,,,499.3668997,677.2544934,435.2,499.3668997,677.2544934,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2339,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pedreguer,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1510.4,,,1733.096887,2350.471477,1510.4,1733.096887,2350.471477,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2340,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Borriol,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2341,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puig,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2342,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,537.6,,,616.8649937,836.6084918,537.6,616.8649937,836.6084918,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2343,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,358.4,,,411.2433291,557.7389945,358.4,411.2433291,557.7389945,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2344,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,294.4,,,337.8070204,458.1427455,294.4,337.8070204,458.1427455,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2345,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcora,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,76.8,,,88.12357053,119.5154988,76.8,88.12357053,119.5154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2346,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2347,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2348,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2349,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,204.8,,,234.9961881,318.7079969,204.8,234.9961881,318.7079969,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2350,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1280,,,1468.726176,1991.92498,1280,1468.726176,1991.92498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2351,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bunol,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,204.8,,,234.9961881,318.7079969,204.8,234.9961881,318.7079969,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2352,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,780.8,,,895.9229671,1215.074238,780.8,895.9229671,1215.074238,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2353,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Casinos,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,192,,,220.3089263,298.7887471,192,220.3089263,298.7887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2354,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,358.4,,,411.2433291,557.7389945,358.4,411.2433291,557.7389945,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2355,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,768,,,881.2357053,1195.154988,768,881.2357053,1195.154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2356,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalance,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,396.8,,,455.3051144,617.496744,396.8,455.3051144,617.496744,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2357,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lliria,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,192,,,220.3089263,298.7887471,192,220.3089263,298.7887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2358,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Moncada,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2359,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,409.6,,,469.9923762,637.4159938,409.6,469.9923762,637.4159938,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2360,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Olocau,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2361,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2362,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2363,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,307.2,,,352.4942821,478.0619953,307.2,352.4942821,478.0619953,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2364,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1510.4,,,1733.096887,2350.471477,1510.4,1733.096887,2350.471477,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2365,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Yatova,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,204.8,,,234.9961881,318.7079969,204.8,234.9961881,318.7079969,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2367,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Synomym. Original name in document: Cylindropuntia subulata,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2368,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Kalanchoe,Kalanchoe daigremontiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Soneja,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2369,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benitachell,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2370,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Callosa de Segura,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,96,,,110.1544632,149.3943735,96,110.1544632,149.3943735,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2371,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pedreguer,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,230.4,,,264.3707116,358.5464965,230.4,264.3707116,358.5464965,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2372,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2373,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,204.8,,,234.9961881,318.7079969,204.8,234.9961881,318.7079969,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2374,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2375,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pedreguer,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,64,,,73.43630878,99.59624902,64,73.43630878,99.59624902,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2376,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfondeguilla,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1280,,,1468.726176,1991.92498,1280,1468.726176,1991.92498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2377,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2378,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2379,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2380,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chovar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1408,,,1615.598793,2191.117479,1408,1615.598793,2191.117479,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2381,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2382,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Uxo,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,409.6,,,469.9923762,637.4159938,409.6,469.9923762,637.4159938,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2383,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2384,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2385,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2386,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,896,,,1028.108323,1394.347486,896,1028.108323,1394.347486,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2388,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1011.2,,,1160.293679,1573.620735,1011.2,1160.293679,1573.620735,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2389,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,230.4,,,264.3707116,358.5464965,230.4,264.3707116,358.5464965,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2390,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1113.6,,,1277.791773,1732.974733,1113.6,1277.791773,1732.974733,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2391,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2392,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,243.2,,,279.0579733,378.4657463,243.2,279.0579733,378.4657463,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2393,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,12.8,,,14.68726176,19.9192498,12.8,14.68726176,19.9192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2394,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,76.8,,,88.12357053,119.5154988,76.8,88.12357053,119.5154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2395,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,38.4,,,44.06178527,59.75774941,38.4,44.06178527,59.75774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2396,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,230.4,,,264.3707116,358.5464965,230.4,264.3707116,358.5464965,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2397,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,64,,,73.43630878,99.59624902,64,73.43630878,99.59624902,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2398,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Anacardiaceae,Schinus,Schinus molle,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2399,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Jacobea,Jacobaea maritima,,Silver Ragwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pedreguer,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Original name in document is a synomym = Senecio cineraria.,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2400,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,588.8,,,675.6140407,916.285491,588.8,675.6140407,916.285491,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2401,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,51.2,,,58.74904702,79.67699922,51.2,58.74904702,79.67699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2402,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,102.4,,,117.498094,159.3539984,102.4,117.498094,159.3539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2403,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,128,,,146.8726176,199.192498,128,146.8726176,199.192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2404,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,128,,,146.8726176,199.192498,128,146.8726176,199.192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2405,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Olleria,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2406,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lliria,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,256,,,293.7452351,398.3849961,256,293.7452351,398.3849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. (Cylindropuntia aurantiaca ?),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2407,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2408,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,25.6,,,29.37452351,39.83849961,25.6,29.37452351,39.83849961,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2409,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,96,,,110.1544632,149.3943735,96,110.1544632,149.3943735,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2410,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,128,,,146.8726176,199.192498,128,146.8726176,199.192498,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2411,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,537.6,,,616.8649937,836.6084918,537.6,616.8649937,836.6084918,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2412,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2413,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2414,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Moncada,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,384,,,440.6178527,597.5774941,384,440.6178527,597.5774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2415,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2416,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Juan de Alicante,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2417,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tibi,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,192,,,220.3089263,298.7887471,192,220.3089263,298.7887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2419,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Jorge,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,76.8,,,88.12357053,119.5154988,76.8,88.12357053,119.5154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2420,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Moraceae,Morus,Morus nigra,,Black Mulberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Jorge,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,38.4,,,44.06178527,59.75774941,38.4,44.06178527,59.75774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2421,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,153.6,,,176.2471411,239.0309977,153.6,176.2471411,239.0309977,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2422,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Carlet,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,38.4,,,44.06178527,59.75774941,38.4,44.06178527,59.75774941,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2423,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3660.8,,,4200.556862,5696.905444,3660.8,4200.556862,5696.905444,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2424,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Catarroja,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,115.2,,,132.1853558,179.2732482,115.2,132.1853558,179.2732482,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2425,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2426,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Foyos,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,115.2,,,132.1853558,179.2732482,115.2,132.1853558,179.2732482,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2427,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,883.2,,,1013.421061,1374.428237,883.2,1013.421061,1374.428237,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2428,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Paterna,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,192,,,220.3089263,298.7887471,192,220.3089263,298.7887471,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2429,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,307.2,,,352.4942821,478.0619953,307.2,352.4942821,478.0619953,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2430,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuart de Poblet,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,115.2,,,132.1853558,179.2732482,115.2,132.1853558,179.2732482,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2431,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,140.8,,,161.5598793,219.1117479,140.8,161.5598793,219.1117479,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2432,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Antonio de Benageber,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,460.8,,,528.7414232,717.092993,460.8,528.7414232,717.092993,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2433,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Silla,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,115.2,,,132.1853558,179.2732482,115.2,132.1853558,179.2732482,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2434,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tavernes de la Valldigna,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,512,,,587.4904702,796.7699922,512,587.4904702,796.7699922,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2435,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,768,,,881.2357053,1195.154988,768,881.2357053,1195.154988,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2436,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,140.8,,,161.5598793,219.1117479,140.8,161.5598793,219.1117479,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Baldios, Original species name in document: Pennisetum villosum is a synomym.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2437,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,115.2,,,132.1853558,179.2732482,115.2,132.1853558,179.2732482,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Baldios, Original species name in document: Pennisetum villosum is a synomym.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2438,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,115.2,,,132.1853558,179.2732482,115.2,132.1853558,179.2732482,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2439,TC,SP_30,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2015,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2016,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castro Cliff/ Eslida/ Castellon,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,1024,,,1174.98094,1593.539984,1024,1174.98094,1593.539984,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"La viña del Tíbet fue localizada en mayo de 2015 en el Barranco de Castro (Eslida, Castellón), en lo que constituyó su primera cita para la Comunitat Valenciana. First dectection date for R. japonica in the Valencia Authonomous Region",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2445,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1036.8,,,1171.253444,1616.892535,1036.8,1171.253444,1616.892535,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2446,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2745.6,,,3101.652638,4281.770971,2745.6,3101.652638,4281.770971,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2447,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,96,,,108.4493929,149.7122717,96,108.4493929,149.7122717,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2450,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,102.4,,,115.6793525,159.6930898,102.4,115.6793525,159.6930898,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2451,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar de la Safor,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,204.8,,,231.3587049,319.3861797,204.8,231.3587049,319.3861797,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. LIC Guardamar de la Safor,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2452,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2453,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3238.4,,,3658.359522,5050.293966,3238.4,3658.359522,5050.293966,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2454,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,915.2,,,1033.884213,1427.25699,915.2,1033.884213,1427.25699,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. LIC Albufera de Valencia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2456,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,25.6,,,28.91983812,39.92327246,25.6,28.91983812,39.92327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2457,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1894.4,,,2140.068021,2954.322162,1894.4,2140.068021,2954.322162,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2458,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar de la Safor,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,204.8,,,231.3587049,319.3861797,204.8,231.3587049,319.3861797,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2459,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2460,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2461,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,614.4,,,694.0761148,958.1585391,614.4,694.0761148,958.1585391,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2462,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,588.8,,,665.1562767,918.2352666,588.8,665.1562767,918.2352666,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2463,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1999.36,,,2258.639357,3118.007579,1999.36,2258.639357,3118.007579,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas LIC Guardamar del Segura,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2464,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1164.8,,,1315.852634,1816.508897,1164.8,1315.852634,1816.508897,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2465,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,15206.4,,,17178.38384,23714.42384,15206.4,17178.38384,23714.42384,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. LIC Albufera de Valencia,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2466,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,212.48,,,240.0346564,331.3631614,212.48,240.0346564,331.3631614,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2467,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,307.2,,,347.0380574,479.0792695,307.2,347.0380574,479.0792695,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2469,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Iridaceae,Freesia,Freesia refracta,,Common freesia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2472,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,5.12,,,5.783967624,7.984654492,5.12,5.783967624,7.984654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2473,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,422.4,,,477.1773289,658.7339956,422.4,477.1773289,658.7339956,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2474,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,962.56,,,1087.385913,1501.115045,962.56,1087.385913,1501.115045,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2475,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,211.2,,,238.5886645,329.3669978,211.2,238.5886645,329.3669978,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2476,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Nyctaginaceae,Mirabilis,Mirabilis jalapa,,Marvel of peru,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,57.6,,,65.06963576,89.82736304,57.6,65.06963576,89.82736304,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2477,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2478,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2479,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,51.2,,,57.83967624,79.84654492,51.2,57.83967624,79.84654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2480,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,64,,,72.29959529,99.80818115,64,72.29959529,99.80818115,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2481,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,614.4,,,694.0761148,958.1585391,614.4,694.0761148,958.1585391,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2482,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,153.6,,,173.5190287,239.5396348,153.6,173.5190287,239.5396348,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2483,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1344,,,1518.291501,2095.971804,1344,1518.291501,2095.971804,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2484,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,7.68,,,8.675951435,11.97698174,7.68,8.675951435,11.97698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2486,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2487,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Moncofora,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2488,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum linnaeanum,,Sodom-apple,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,134.4,,,151.8291501,209.5971804,134.4,151.8291501,209.5971804,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2489,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum linnaeanum,,Sodom-apple,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,57.6,,,65.06963576,89.82736304,57.6,65.06963576,89.82736304,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2490,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia filifera,,American cotton palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2491,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium spinosum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,76.8,,,86.75951435,119.7698174,76.8,86.75951435,119.7698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2495,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malvales,Malvaceae,Abutilon,Abutilon theophrasti,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2496,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,115.2,,,130.1392715,179.6547261,115.2,130.1392715,179.6547261,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2497,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,10.24,,,11.56793525,15.96930898,10.24,11.56793525,15.96930898,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2498,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,121.6,,,137.3692311,189.6355442,121.6,137.3692311,189.6355442,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2499,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,294.4,,,332.5781384,459.1176333,294.4,332.5781384,459.1176333,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2500,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,81.92,,,92.54348198,127.7544719,81.92,92.54348198,127.7544719,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2503,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,192,,,216.8987859,299.4245435,192,216.8987859,299.4245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2504,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,870.4,,,983.274496,1357.391264,870.4,983.274496,1357.391264,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2505,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,204.8,,,231.3587049,319.3861797,204.8,231.3587049,319.3861797,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2506,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,57.6,,,65.06963576,89.82736304,57.6,65.06963576,89.82736304,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2507,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,138.24,,,156.1671258,215.5856713,138.24,156.1671258,215.5856713,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2508,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4454.4,,,5032.051832,6946.649408,4454.4,5032.051832,6946.649408,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2509,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,755.2,,,853.1352245,1177.736538,755.2,853.1352245,1177.736538,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2510,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe maculata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,26.88,,,30.36583002,41.91943608,26.88,30.36583002,41.91943608,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2512,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,563.2,,,636.2364386,878.3119941,563.2,636.2364386,878.3119941,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2513,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,4716.8,,,5328.480173,7355.862951,4716.8,5328.480173,7355.862951,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2514,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,544,,,614.54656,848.3695398,544,614.54656,848.3695398,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2515,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuevas de Vinroma,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,320,,,361.4979765,499.0409058,320,361.4979765,499.0409058,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2516,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,96,,,108.4493929,149.7122717,96,108.4493929,149.7122717,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2517,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jalance,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1920,,,2168.987859,2994.245435,1920,2168.987859,2994.245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2518,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Jana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,96,,,108.4493929,149.7122717,96,108.4493929,149.7122717,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2519,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lucena del Cid,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2520,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,505.6,,,571.1668028,788.4846311,505.6,571.1668028,788.4846311,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2521,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,5094.4,,,5755.047785,7944.73122,5094.4,5755.047785,7944.73122,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2522,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,134.4,,,151.8291501,209.5971804,134.4,151.8291501,209.5971804,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2523,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1920,,,2168.987859,2994.245435,1920,2168.987859,2994.245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2524,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sant Jordi,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,172.8,,,195.2089073,269.4820891,172.8,195.2089073,269.4820891,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2525,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,211.2,,,238.5886645,329.3669978,211.2,238.5886645,329.3669978,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2526,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,224,,,253.0485835,349.328634,224,253.0485835,349.328634,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2527,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villanueva de Alcolea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,83.2,,,93.98947388,129.7506355,83.2,93.98947388,129.7506355,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2528,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vinaroz,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,57.6,,,65.06963576,89.82736304,57.6,65.06963576,89.82736304,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2529,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2675.2,,,3022.123083,4171.981972,2675.2,3022.123083,4171.981972,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2530,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2531,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2532,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2533,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chilches,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2534,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,La Llosa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,96,,,108.4493929,149.7122717,96,108.4493929,149.7122717,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2535,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,288,,,325.3481788,449.1368152,288,325.3481788,449.1368152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2536,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Cocoyam,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,704,,,795.2955482,1097.889993,704,795.2955482,1097.889993,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2537,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,435.2,,,491.637248,678.6956318,435.2,491.637248,678.6956318,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2538,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,25.6,,,28.91983812,39.92327246,25.6,28.91983812,39.92327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2539,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,89.6,,,101.2194334,139.7314536,89.6,101.2194334,139.7314536,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2540,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,44.8,,,50.60971671,69.86572681,44.8,50.60971671,69.86572681,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2541,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2542,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2543,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Mogente,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2544,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,307.2,,,347.0380574,479.0792695,307.2,347.0380574,479.0792695,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2545,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Original name in document= Cyperus alternifolius",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2546,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pego,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1920,,,2168.987859,2994.245435,1920,2168.987859,2994.245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2547,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,102.4,,,115.6793525,159.6930898,102.4,115.6793525,159.6930898,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE2548,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus camaldulensis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2549,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Gleditsia,Gleditsia triacanthos,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,358.4,,,404.8777336,558.9258145,358.4,404.8777336,558.9258145,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2550,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Helianthus,Helianthus tuberosus,,Jerusalem-artichoke,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,332.8,,,375.9578955,519.002542,332.8,375.9578955,519.002542,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2551,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,640,,,722.9959529,998.0818115,640,722.9959529,998.0818115,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2552,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Juan de Alicante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2553,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,145.92,,,164.8430773,227.562653,145.92,164.8430773,227.562653,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2554,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,102.4,,,115.6793525,159.6930898,102.4,115.6793525,159.6930898,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2555,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,White leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,768,,,867.5951435,1197.698174,768,867.5951435,1197.698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2556,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bellus,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1024,,,1156.793525,1596.930898,1024,1156.793525,1596.930898,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2557,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sueca,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2558,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2559,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jativa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,768,,,867.5951435,1197.698174,768,867.5951435,1197.698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2560,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2944,,,3325.781384,4591.176333,2944,3325.781384,4591.176333,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2561,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia repens,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,192,,,216.8987859,299.4245435,192,216.8987859,299.4245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Original name in document= Ludwigia natans",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2563,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,25.6,,,28.91983812,39.92327246,25.6,28.91983812,39.92327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2564,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villanueva de Alcolea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,76.8,,,86.75951435,119.7698174,76.8,86.75951435,119.7698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2565,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,26.88,,,30.36583002,41.91943608,26.88,30.36583002,41.91943608,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2566,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bellus,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2567,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Genoves,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1203.2,,,1359.232392,1876.393806,1203.2,1359.232392,1876.393806,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2568,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jativa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1484.8,,,1677.350611,2315.549803,1484.8,1677.350611,2315.549803,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2569,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,960,,,1084.493929,1497.122717,960,1084.493929,1497.122717,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2570,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Nymphaeaceae,Nymphaea,Nymphaea mexicana,,Mexican waterlily,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,12.8,,,14.45991906,19.96163623,12.8,14.45991906,19.96163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2571,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2572,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2573,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,524.8,,,592.8566814,818.4270854,524.8,592.8566814,818.4270854,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2574,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,102.4,,,115.6793525,159.6930898,102.4,115.6793525,159.6930898,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2575,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Ditch reed,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,268.8,,,303.6583002,419.1943608,268.8,303.6583002,419.1943608,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2576,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Ditch reed,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torreblanca,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2577,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,57.6,,,65.06963576,89.82736304,57.6,65.06963576,89.82736304,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2578,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,153.6,,,173.5190287,239.5396348,153.6,173.5190287,239.5396348,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2579,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2580,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,83.2,,,93.98947388,129.7506355,83.2,93.98947388,129.7506355,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2581,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,838.4,,,947.1246984,1307.487173,838.4,947.1246984,1307.487173,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2582,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,57.6,,,65.06963576,89.82736304,57.6,65.06963576,89.82736304,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2583,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2792.96,,,3155.154339,4355.629025,2792.96,3155.154339,4355.629025,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2584,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Fuentes de Ayodar,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,179.2,,,202.4388668,279.4629072,179.2,202.4388668,279.4629072,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2585,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,275.2,,,310.8882598,429.175179,275.2,310.8882598,429.175179,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2586,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,147.2,,,166.2890692,229.5588166,147.2,166.2890692,229.5588166,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2587,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Salicaceae,Salix,Salix babylonica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,230.4,,,260.2785431,359.3094521,230.4,260.2785431,359.3094521,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2588,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,Cape-Ivy,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,179.2,,,202.4388668,279.4629072,179.2,202.4388668,279.4629072,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2589,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Commelinaceae,Tradescantia,Tradescantia fluminensis,,Spiderwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Paterna,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2590,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia robusta,,Mexican fan palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,15.36,,,17.35190287,23.95396348,15.36,17.35190287,23.95396348,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2591,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Washingtonia,Washingtonia robusta,,Mexican fan palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torreblanca,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,76.8,,,86.75951435,119.7698174,76.8,86.75951435,119.7698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2592,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2593,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2594,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,327.68,,,370.1739279,511.0178875,327.68,370.1739279,511.0178875,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2595,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,204.8,,,231.3587049,319.3861797,204.8,231.3587049,319.3861797,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2597,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,51.2,,,57.83967624,79.84654492,51.2,57.83967624,79.84654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2598,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave sisalana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,153.6,,,173.5190287,239.5396348,153.6,173.5190287,239.5396348,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2600,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave tequilana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2602,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,Heartleaf iceplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,19.2,,,21.68987859,29.94245435,19.2,21.68987859,29.94245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Species name in the document is a synonim; original name in the doc =  Aptenia cordifolia",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2603,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,38.4,,,43.37975718,59.88490869,38.4,43.37975718,59.88490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2604,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,184.32,,,208.2228344,287.4475617,184.32,208.2228344,287.4475617,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2605,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Kalanchoe,Kalanchoe daigremontiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2606,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,261.12,,,294.9823488,407.2173791,261.12,294.9823488,407.2173791,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2607,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,20.48,,,23.13587049,31.93861797,20.48,23.13587049,31.93861797,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2608,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,White leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,345.6,,,390.4178146,538.9641782,345.6,390.4178146,538.9641782,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2609,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Nyctaginaceae,Mirabilis,Mirabilis jalapa,,Marvel of peru,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2610,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,153.6,,,173.5190287,239.5396348,153.6,173.5190287,239.5396348,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2611,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,76.8,,,86.75951435,119.7698174,76.8,86.75951435,119.7698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2615,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Finestrat,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2616,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Callosa de Segura,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2617,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2619,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2620,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,6528,,,7374.55872,10180.43448,6528,7374.55872,10180.43448,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2621,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,896,,,1012.194334,1397.314536,896,1012.194334,1397.314536,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2622,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Belgida,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,896,,,1012.194334,1397.314536,896,1012.194334,1397.314536,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2623,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1664,,,1879.789478,2595.01271,1664,1879.789478,2595.01271,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2624,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2625,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2626,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2627,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2628,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe vera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oropesa del Mar,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2629,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2304,,,2602.785431,3593.094521,2304,2602.785431,3593.094521,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2630,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benitachell,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2631,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2632,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2633,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villavieja,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2634,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2635,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Borriol,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques (Cylindropuntia aurantiaca?),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2636,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2637,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2638,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cocentaina,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2639,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcora,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2640,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2641,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2642,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2048,,,2313.587049,3193.861797,2048,2313.587049,3193.861797,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2643,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,El Campello,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2644,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Catadau,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2645,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2646,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1408,,,1590.591096,2195.779985,1408,1590.591096,2195.779985,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2647,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gatova,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2648,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3200,,,3614.979765,4990.409058,3200,3614.979765,4990.409058,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2649,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1664,,,1879.789478,2595.01271,1664,1879.789478,2595.01271,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2650,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,896,,,1012.194334,1397.314536,896,1012.194334,1397.314536,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2651,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2652,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Naquera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2653,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Olocau,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2654,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2655,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2656,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2657,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1920,,,2168.987859,2994.245435,1920,2168.987859,2994.245435,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2658,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus globulus,,Eucalyptus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2660,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puzol,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2661,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2662,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2663,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2664,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benitachell,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2665,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2666,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2667,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2668,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2669,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Quatretondeta,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2670,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Gallinera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,768,,,867.5951435,1197.698174,768,867.5951435,1197.698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2671,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2672,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex parviflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2674,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2675,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1152,,,1301.392715,1796.547261,1152,1301.392715,1796.547261,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2676,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Biar,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2677,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cocentaina,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,896,,,1012.194334,1397.314536,896,1012.194334,1397.314536,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2678,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2679,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2680,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,896,,,1012.194334,1397.314536,896,1012.194334,1397.314536,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2681,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Biar,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2682,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Crevillent,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2683,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2684,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,640,,,722.9959529,998.0818115,640,722.9959529,998.0818115,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2685,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Godella,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2176,,,2458.18624,3393.478159,2176,2458.18624,3393.478159,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2686,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Moncada,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2687,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2688,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2689,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2690,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Juan de Alicante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1408,,,1590.591096,2195.779985,1408,1590.591096,2195.779985,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2691,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tibi,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2692,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrent,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2693,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,1024,,,1156.793525,1596.930898,1024,1156.793525,1596.930898,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2694,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Useras,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2695,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ador,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2696,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gilet,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,256,,,289.1983812,399.2327246,256,289.1983812,399.2327246,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2697,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,512,,,578.3967624,798.4654492,512,578.3967624,798.4654492,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2698,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,768,,,867.5951435,1197.698174,768,867.5951435,1197.698174,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2699,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2700,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2701,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,128,,,144.5991906,199.6163623,128,144.5991906,199.6163623,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2702,TC,SP_31,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2017,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2018,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium orientale,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sinarcas,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,384,,,433.7975718,598.8490869,384,433.7975718,598.8490869,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Original species name in document is a synomym = Xanthium italicum.,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2704,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1126.4,,,1273.374212,1754.967619,1126.4,1273.374212,1754.967619,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2705,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,674.56,,,762.5775108,1050.98629,674.56,762.5775108,1050.98629,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2706,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia karroo,,Karroothorn,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,588.8,,,665.6274288,917.3694372,588.8,665.6274288,917.3694372,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7. Synonym of  Acacia karroo,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2709,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,179.2,,,202.5822609,279.1993939,179.2,202.5822609,279.1993939,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2710,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2711,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,34.56,,,39.06943604,53.8455974,34.56,39.06943604,53.8455974,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2712,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,998.4,,,1128.672597,1555.539481,998.4,1128.672597,1555.539481,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2714,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asphodelaceae,Aloe,Aloe maculata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2716,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Arctotheca,Arctotheca calendula,,Espumilla,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2717,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,6396.16,,,7230.739699,9965.424082,6396.16,7230.739699,9965.424082,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2718,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,256,,,289.4032299,398.8562771,256,289.4032299,398.8562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2719,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,188.16,,,212.711374,293.1593636,188.16,212.711374,293.1593636,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2720,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,76.8,,,86.82096897,119.6568831,76.8,86.82096897,119.6568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2721,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,30.72,,,34.72838759,47.86275325,30.72,34.72838759,47.86275325,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7. Original name of the species in the document = Boussingaultia cordifolia.,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2722,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1895.68,,,2143.030917,2953.530732,1895.68,2143.030917,2953.530732,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2723,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,53.76,,,60.77467828,83.75981818,53.76,60.77467828,83.75981818,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2724,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000.32,,,3391.805854,4674.595567,3000.32,3391.805854,4674.595567,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2725,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,34.56,,,39.06943604,53.8455974,34.56,39.06943604,53.8455974,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2726,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15439.36,,,17453.90879,24055.02207,15439.36,17453.90879,24055.02207,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2727,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,256,,,289.4032299,398.8562771,256,289.4032299,398.8562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2728,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,486.4,,,549.8661368,757.8269264,486.4,549.8661368,757.8269264,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2729,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2730,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,358.4,,,405.1645219,558.3987879,358.4,405.1645219,558.3987879,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2732,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Iridaceae,Freesia,Freesia refracta,,Common freesia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,134.4,,,151.9366957,209.3995455,134.4,151.9366957,209.3995455,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2733,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,755.2,,,853.7395282,1176.626017,755.2,853.7395282,1176.626017,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2734,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,97.28,,,109.9732274,151.5653853,97.28,109.9732274,151.5653853,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2735,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,26.88,,,30.38733914,41.87990909,26.88,30.38733914,41.87990909,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2736,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,134.4,,,151.9366957,209.3995455,134.4,151.9366957,209.3995455,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2737,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,5.12,,,5.788064598,7.977125541,5.12,5.788064598,7.977125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2738,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Myoporum,Myoporum laetum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,52.48,,,59.32766213,81.7655368,52.48,59.32766213,81.7655368,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2739,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15.36,,,17.36419379,23.93137662,15.36,17.36419379,23.93137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2740,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,358.4,,,405.1645219,558.3987879,358.4,405.1645219,558.3987879,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2741,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,435.2,,,491.9854908,678.055671,435.2,491.9854908,678.055671,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2742,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Valencia,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,230.4,,,260.4629069,358.9706494,230.4,260.4629069,358.9706494,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2743,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Oenothera,Oenothera biennis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alboraya,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,115.2,,,130.2314535,179.4853247,115.2,130.2314535,179.4853247,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2744,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Common prickly pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,25.6,,,28.94032299,39.88562771,25.6,28.94032299,39.88562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7. Original name in document is a synomym = Opuntia dillenii,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2745,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2747,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,53.76,,,60.77467828,83.75981818,53.76,60.77467828,83.75981818,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2748,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,25.6,,,28.94032299,39.88562771,25.6,28.94032299,39.88562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2749,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,81.92,,,92.60903357,127.6340087,81.92,92.60903357,127.6340087,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2750,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Anacardiaceae,Schinus,Schinus terebinthifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,358.4,,,405.1645219,558.3987879,358.4,405.1645219,558.3987879,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2751,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum linnaeanum,,Sodom-apple,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,224,,,253.2278262,348.9992424,224,253.2278262,348.9992424,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2752,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Xanthium,Xanthium orientale,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Burriana,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,38.4,,,43.41048448,59.82844156,38.4,43.41048448,59.82844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7. Original species name in document is a synomym = Xanthium italicum.,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2753,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca aloifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine dunes,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,256,,,289.4032299,398.8562771,256,289.4032299,398.8562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Dunas maritimas. Pag. 6 & 7,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2757,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,307.2,,,347.2838759,478.6275325,307.2,347.2838759,478.6275325,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2758,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,230.4,,,260.4629069,358.9706494,230.4,260.4629069,358.9706494,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2759,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,454.4,,,513.6907331,707.9698918,454.4,513.6907331,707.9698918,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2760,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2761,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,224,,,253.2278262,348.9992424,224,253.2278262,348.9992424,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2762,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,57.6,,,65.11572673,89.74266234,57.6,65.11572673,89.74266234,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2763,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,697.6,,,788.6238015,1086.883355,697.6,788.6238015,1086.883355,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2764,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,89.6,,,101.2911305,139.599697,89.6,101.2911305,139.599697,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2765,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,320,,,361.7540374,498.5703463,320,361.7540374,498.5703463,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2766,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,652.8,,,737.9782362,1017.083507,652.8,737.9782362,1017.083507,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2767,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,Heartleaf iceplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,51.2,,,57.88064598,79.77125541,51.2,57.88064598,79.77125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9. Species name in the document is a synonim; original name in the doc =  Aptenia cordifolia",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2768,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Araujia,Araujia sericifera,,Cape-dandelion,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vinaroz,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,51.2,,,57.88064598,79.77125541,51.2,57.88064598,79.77125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2769,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,358.4,,,405.1645219,558.3987879,358.4,405.1645219,558.3987879,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2770,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jeresa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3584,,,4051.645219,5583.987879,3584,4051.645219,5583.987879,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2771,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Sagunto,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2304,,,2604.629069,3589.706494,2304,2604.629069,3589.706494,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2772,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,377.6,,,426.8697641,588.3130087,377.6,426.8697641,588.3130087,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2773,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,5702.4,,,6446.456946,8884.523572,5702.4,6446.456946,8884.523572,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2774,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villanueva de Alcolea,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,646.4,,,730.7431555,1007.1121,646.4,730.7431555,1007.1121,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2775,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Altea,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,384,,,434.1048448,598.2844156,384,434.1048448,598.2844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2776,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,172.8,,,195.3471802,269.227987,172.8,195.3471802,269.227987,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2777,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,268.8,,,303.8733914,418.7990909,268.8,303.8733914,418.7990909,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2778,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuevas de Vinroma,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,243.2,,,274.9330684,378.9134632,243.2,274.9330684,378.9134632,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2779,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Llosa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,307.2,,,347.2838759,478.6275325,307.2,347.2838759,478.6275325,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2780,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3328,,,3762.241989,5185.131602,3328,3762.241989,5185.131602,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2781,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,844.8,,,955.0306587,1316.225714,844.8,955.0306587,1316.225714,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2782,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Llosa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,38.4,,,43.41048448,59.82844156,38.4,43.41048448,59.82844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2783,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,51.2,,,57.88064598,79.77125541,51.2,57.88064598,79.77125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9. Original name of the species in the document = Boussingaultia cordifolia.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2784,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Basellaceae,Anredera,Anredera cordifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,76.8,,,86.82096897,119.6568831,76.8,86.82096897,119.6568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9. Original name of the species in the document = Boussingaultia cordifolia.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2785,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,Highway ice plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,57.6,,,65.11572673,89.74266234,57.6,65.11572673,89.74266234,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2786,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Cocoyam,Aquatic,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Gandia,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,896,,,1012.911305,1395.99697,896,1012.911305,1395.99697,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2787,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Cocoyam,Aquatic,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellon de la Plana,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,345.6,,,390.6943604,538.455974,345.6,390.6943604,538.455974,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2788,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,204.8,,,231.5225839,319.0850217,204.8,231.5225839,319.0850217,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2789,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chilches,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,563.2,,,636.6871058,877.4838095,563.2,636.6871058,877.4838095,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2790,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,473.6,,,535.3959753,737.8841126,473.6,535.3959753,737.8841126,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2791,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pinet,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,51.2,,,57.88064598,79.77125541,51.2,57.88064598,79.77125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2792,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,204.8,,,231.5225839,319.0850217,204.8,231.5225839,319.0850217,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2793,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,19.2,,,21.70524224,29.91422078,19.2,21.70524224,29.91422078,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2794,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Mogente,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,384,,,434.1048448,598.2844156,384,434.1048448,598.2844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2795,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,38.4,,,43.41048448,59.82844156,38.4,43.41048448,59.82844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2796,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villajoyosa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,384,,,434.1048448,598.2844156,384,434.1048448,598.2844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2797,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,384,,,434.1048448,598.2844156,384,434.1048448,598.2844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2798,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuevas de Vinroma,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,38.4,,,43.41048448,59.82844156,38.4,43.41048448,59.82844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9. Original name in document= Cyperus alternifolius",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2799,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Pego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1792,,,2025.822609,2791.993939,1792,2025.822609,2791.993939,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2800,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Helianthus,Helianthus tuberosus,,Jerusalem-artichoke,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2801,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,White leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,896,,,1012.911305,1395.99697,896,1012.911305,1395.99697,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2803,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,89.6,,,101.2911305,139.599697,89.6,101.2911305,139.599697,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2804,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,57.6,,,65.11572673,89.74266234,57.6,65.11572673,89.74266234,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2805,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Moraceae,Morus,Morus alba,,White Mulberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,57.6,,,65.11572673,89.74266234,57.6,65.11572673,89.74266234,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2806,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Genoves,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,6476.8,,,7321.901716,10091.06381,6476.8,7321.901716,10091.06381,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2807,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Jativa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4198.4,,,4746.21297,6541.242944,4198.4,4746.21297,6541.242944,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2808,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,364.8,,,412.3996026,568.3701948,364.8,412.3996026,568.3701948,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2809,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2810,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,97.28,,,109.9732274,151.5653853,97.28,109.9732274,151.5653853,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2811,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Paulowniaceae,Paulownia,Paulownia tomentosa,,Princesstree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cotes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2812,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Paulowniaceae,Paulownia,Paulownia tomentosa,,Princesstree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Navarres,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,358.4,,,405.1645219,558.3987879,358.4,405.1645219,558.3987879,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2813,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Phoenix,Phoenix canariensis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,96,,,108.5262112,149.5711039,96,108.5262112,149.5711039,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2814,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Ditch reed,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villena,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,253.44,,,286.5091976,394.8677143,253.44,286.5091976,394.8677143,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2815,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2816,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,128,,,144.7016149,199.4281385,128,144.7016149,199.4281385,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2817,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,486.4,,,549.8661368,757.8269264,486.4,549.8661368,757.8269264,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2818,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,19.2,,,21.70524224,29.91422078,19.2,21.70524224,29.91422078,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2819,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,352,,,397.9294411,548.427381,352,397.9294411,548.427381,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2820,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,76.8,,,86.82096897,119.6568831,76.8,86.82096897,119.6568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2821,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vallibona,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,172.8,,,195.3471802,269.227987,172.8,195.3471802,269.227987,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2822,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Fuentes de Ayodar,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,537.6,,,607.7467828,837.5981818,537.6,607.7467828,837.5981818,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2823,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,652.8,,,737.9782362,1017.083507,652.8,737.9782362,1017.083507,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2824,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Salicaceae,Salix,Salix babylonica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almenara,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,115.2,,,130.2314535,179.4853247,115.2,130.2314535,179.4853247,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2825,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Typhaceae,Typha,Typha angustifolia,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,384,,,434.1048448,598.2844156,384,434.1048448,598.2844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2826,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Typhaceae,Typha,Typha angustifolia,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,25.6,,,28.94032299,39.88562771,25.6,28.94032299,39.88562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2827,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Typhaceae,Typha,Typha angustifolia,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,Marhslands -  river -  dry riverbed,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,19.2,,,21.70524224,29.91422078,19.2,21.70524224,29.91422078,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Marjales, rios, ramblas. Pag. 8 & 9",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2828,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,128,,,144.7016149,199.4281385,128,144.7016149,199.4281385,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2829,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15.36,,,17.36419379,23.93137662,15.36,17.36419379,23.93137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2832,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,276.48,,,312.5554883,430.7647792,276.48,312.5554883,430.7647792,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2833,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2834,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave sisalana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,921.6,,,1041.851628,1435.882597,921.6,1041.851628,1435.882597,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2837,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Mesembryanthemum,Mesembryanthemum cordifolium,,Heartleaf iceplant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,128,,,144.7016149,199.4281385,128,144.7016149,199.4281385,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10.Species name in the document is a synonim; original name in the doc =  Aptenia cordifolia",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2838,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,10.24,,,11.5761292,15.95425108,10.24,11.5761292,15.95425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2839,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2840,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Guardamar del Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2841,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2842,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Nyctaginaceae,Mirabilis,Mirabilis jalapa,,Marvel of peru,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Denia,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,30.72,,,34.72838759,47.86275325,30.72,34.72838759,47.86275325,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2843,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Nicotiana,Nicotiana glauca,,mustard tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Orihuela,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2844,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,126.72,,,143.2545988,197.4338571,126.72,143.2545988,197.4338571,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2845,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2847,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Australian laurel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,128,,,144.7016149,199.4281385,128,144.7016149,199.4281385,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2848,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,Cape-Ivy,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Marine and continental cliffs,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,230.4,,,260.4629069,358.9706494,230.4,260.4629069,358.9706494,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Acantilados, marinos y continentales. Pag. 10",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2851,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,76.8,,,86.82096897,119.6568831,76.8,86.82096897,119.6568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2852,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Austrocylindropuntia,Austrocylindropuntia subulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vilavella,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1024,,,1157.61292,1595.425108,1024,1157.61292,1595.425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2853,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castell de Castells,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,96,,,108.5262112,149.5711039,96,108.5262112,149.5711039,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2854,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia leptocaulis,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Algar de Palancia,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2855,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Campello,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,972.8,,,1099.732274,1515.653853,972.8,1099.732274,1515.653853,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2856,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,San Juan de Alicante,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,307.2,,,347.2838759,478.6275325,307.2,347.2838759,478.6275325,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2857,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,563.2,,,636.6871058,877.4838095,563.2,636.6871058,877.4838095,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2858,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,96,,,108.5262112,149.5711039,96,108.5262112,149.5711039,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2859,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,126.72,,,143.2545988,197.4338571,126.72,143.2545988,197.4338571,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2860,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,384,,,434.1048448,598.2844156,384,434.1048448,598.2844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2861,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Nules,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,192,,,217.0524224,299.1422078,192,217.0524224,299.1422078,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2862,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,588.8,,,665.6274288,917.3694372,588.8,665.6274288,917.3694372,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2863,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Tibi,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,115.2,,,130.2314535,179.4853247,115.2,130.2314535,179.4853247,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2864,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Crevillent,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2865,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alicante,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,409.6,,,463.0451678,638.1700433,409.6,463.0451678,638.1700433,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2866,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Villamarchante,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1536,,,1736.419379,2393.137662,1536,1736.419379,2393.137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2867,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oliva,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,256,,,289.4032299,398.8562771,256,289.4032299,398.8562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2868,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,908.8,,,1027.381466,1415.939784,908.8,1027.381466,1415.939784,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2869,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,588.8,,,665.6274288,917.3694372,588.8,665.6274288,917.3694372,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2872,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Uncultivated fields,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,128,,,144.7016149,199.4281385,128,144.7016149,199.4281385,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Baldios. Pag 13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2873,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2874,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2875,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Vachellia,Vachellia farnesiana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Callosa de Segura,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13. Synonym of  Acacia farnesiana,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2876,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,256,,,289.4032299,398.8562771,256,289.4032299,398.8562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2878,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Canet lo Roig,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,57.6,,,65.11572673,89.74266234,57.6,65.11572673,89.74266234,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2879,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,American agave,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,307.2,,,347.2838759,478.6275325,307.2,347.2838759,478.6275325,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2880,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,89.6,,,101.2911305,139.599697,89.6,101.2911305,139.599697,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2881,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,627.2,,,709.0379132,977.1978788,627.2,709.0379132,977.1978788,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2882,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcoy,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,15148.8,,,17125.43613,23602.3202,15148.8,17125.43613,23602.3202,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2883,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,307.2,,,347.2838759,478.6275325,307.2,347.2838759,478.6275325,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2884,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Beniatjar,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2816,,,3183.435529,4387.419048,2816,3183.435529,4387.419048,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2885,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Belgida,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2886,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,358.4,,,405.1645219,558.3987879,358.4,405.1645219,558.3987879,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2887,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,96,,,108.5262112,149.5711039,96,108.5262112,149.5711039,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2891,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,384,,,434.1048448,598.2844156,384,434.1048448,598.2844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2892,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benitachell,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2893,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,115.2,,,130.2314535,179.4853247,115.2,130.2314535,179.4853247,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2894,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alzira,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2895,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,25.6,,,28.94032299,39.88562771,25.6,28.94032299,39.88562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2896,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampa grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Castellonet de la Conquesta,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2897,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pinopsida,Pinales,Cupressaceae,Cupressus,Cupressus sempervirens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla de Benifasar,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,38.4,,,43.41048448,59.82844156,38.4,43.41048448,59.82844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2898,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Borriol,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,199.68,,,225.7345193,311.1078961,199.68,225.7345193,311.1078961,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13. (Cylindropuntia aurantiaca?),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2899,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Almedijar,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,556.8,,,629.452025,867.5124026,556.8,629.452025,867.5124026,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2900,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,153.6,,,173.6419379,239.3137662,153.6,173.6419379,239.3137662,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2901,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agost,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,76.8,,,86.82096897,119.6568831,76.8,86.82096897,119.6568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2902,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ludiente,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2903,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Betera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,768,,,868.2096897,1196.568831,768,868.2096897,1196.568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2904,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Onda,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,742.4,,,839.2693667,1156.683203,742.4,839.2693667,1156.683203,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2905,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alcora,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,96,,,108.5262112,149.5711039,96,108.5262112,149.5711039,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2906,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,192,,,217.0524224,299.1422078,192,217.0524224,299.1422078,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2907,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Torrevieja,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,258.56,,,292.2972622,402.8448398,258.56,292.2972622,402.8448398,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2908,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cox,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,262.4,,,296.6383106,408.827684,262.4,296.6383106,408.827684,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2909,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Segorbe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,38.4,,,43.41048448,59.82844156,38.4,43.41048448,59.82844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2910,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,409.6,,,463.0451678,638.1700433,409.6,463.0451678,638.1700433,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2911,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Santa Pola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,742.4,,,839.2693667,1156.683203,742.4,839.2693667,1156.683203,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2912,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Petrer,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,230.4,,,260.4629069,358.9706494,230.4,260.4629069,358.9706494,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2913,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Ibi,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,896,,,1012.911305,1395.99697,896,1012.911305,1395.99697,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2914,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Elche,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,128,,,144.7016149,199.4281385,128,144.7016149,199.4281385,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2915,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Campello,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,25.6,,,28.94032299,39.88562771,25.6,28.94032299,39.88562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2916,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Moncada,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,768,,,868.2096897,1196.568831,768,868.2096897,1196.568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2917,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lliria,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2918,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia pallida,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Enova,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1024,,,1157.61292,1595.425108,1024,1157.61292,1595.425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2919,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Cyperaceae,Cyperus,Cyperus alterniflorus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cuevas de Vinroma,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,966.4,,,1092.497193,1505.682446,966.4,1092.497193,1505.682446,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13.Original name in document= Cyperus alternifolius,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2920,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benitachell,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2921,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Oropesa del Mar,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,76.8,,,86.82096897,119.6568831,76.8,86.82096897,119.6568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2922,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Oleaceae,Ligustrum,Ligustrum japonicum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,60.16,,,68.00975903,93.73122511,60.16,68.00975903,93.73122511,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2923,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,38.4,,,43.41048448,59.82844156,38.4,43.41048448,59.82844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2924,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,chinaberry tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Traiguera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,38.4,,,43.41048448,59.82844156,38.4,43.41048448,59.82844156,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2925,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Segorbe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,96,,,108.5262112,149.5711039,96,108.5262112,149.5711039,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2926,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia aurantiaca,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Borriol,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,192,,,217.0524224,299.1422078,192,217.0524224,299.1422078,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2927,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Chovar,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2726.4,,,3082.144398,4247.819351,2726.4,3082.144398,4247.819351,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2928,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Alfondeguilla,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3513.6,,,3972.05933,5474.302403,3513.6,3972.05933,5474.302403,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2929,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,Indian fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Montserrat,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,102.4,,,115.761292,159.5425108,102.4,115.761292,159.5425108,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2930,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Parkinsonia,Parkinsonia aculeata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,51.2,,,57.88064598,79.77125541,51.2,57.88064598,79.77125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2931,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Lliria,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,179.2,,,202.5822609,279.1993939,179.2,202.5822609,279.1993939,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2932,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Peniscola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1075.2,,,1215.493566,1675.196364,1075.2,1215.493566,1675.196364,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2933,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benissa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,76.8,,,86.82096897,119.6568831,76.8,86.82096897,119.6568831,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2934,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,Fountaingrass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cullera,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,512,,,578.8064598,797.7125541,512,578.8064598,797.7125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2935,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus longisetus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Borriol,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,51.2,,,57.88064598,79.77125541,51.2,57.88064598,79.77125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2936,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Eslida,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,230.4,,,260.4629069,358.9706494,230.4,260.4629069,358.9706494,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2937,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor-oil-plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Calpe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,256,,,289.4032299,398.8562771,256,289.4032299,398.8562771,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2938,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Puebla Tornesa,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,345.6,,,390.6943604,538.455974,345.6,390.6943604,538.455974,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2939,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Bocairent,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,115.2,,,130.2314535,179.4853247,115.2,130.2314535,179.4853247,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2940,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Agres,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,204.8,,,231.5225839,319.0850217,204.8,231.5225839,319.0850217,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2941,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vistabella del Maestrazgo,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,243.2,,,274.9330684,378.9134632,243.2,274.9330684,378.9134632,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2942,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Benicasim,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,230.4,,,260.4629069,358.9706494,230.4,260.4629069,358.9706494,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2943,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Cabanes,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,65.28,,,73.79782362,101.7083507,65.28,73.79782362,101.7083507,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2944,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Vall de Almonacid,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,307.2,,,347.2838759,478.6275325,307.2,347.2838759,478.6275325,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2945,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,black locust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Banyeres de Mariola,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,128,,,144.7016149,199.4281385,128,144.7016149,199.4281385,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2946,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,Cape-Ivy,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,Shrubland & Forests,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Teulada,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,51.2,,,57.88064598,79.77125541,51.2,57.88064598,79.77125541,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Matorrales y bosques. Pags 11-13,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2949,TC,SP_54,Actuaciones de control de especies invasoras. Memoria Anual 2016,Generalitat Valenciana- Consellería d'Infraestructures- Territori i Medi Ambient- Dirección General el Medio Natural,NA,2017,Spanish,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Dactylopiidae,Dactylopius,Dactylopius opuntiae,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Valencia,Espadan Mountain,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,6400,,,7235.080747,9971.406927,6400,7235.080747,9971.406927,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Mitigation,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pag. 35,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE2950,TC,Mx1,"Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Producto No.1. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",Dr. Daniel A. Revollo Fernandez,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,"Parpal, J, Saad, L. & Born-Schemidt, G. Mecanismos economicos para la atencion de especies exoticas invasoras en Mexico. En: Prinpicales retos que enfrenta Mexico ante las especies exoticas invasoras. Primera edicion, 2017. Mexico, DF. ",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Cactoblastis,Cactoblastis cactorum,,Nopal moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2002 - 2009,Period,2002,2009,2002,2009,One-time,750000,650000,850000,359543.0359,,93750,44942.87949,,USD,2019,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species to Conabio in Mexico,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2954,TC,Mx1,"Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Producto No.1. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",Dr. Daniel A. Revollo Fernandez,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,"Valdez, M., Plascencia, A. y de Felipe, A. Especies exoticas invasoras que impactan ecosistemas forestales. En Principales retos que enfrenta Mexico ante las especies exoticas invasoras. Primera Edicion, 2017. Mexico, D.F.",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Maconellicoccus,Maconellicoccus hirsutus,,Pink Hibiscus mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2014 - 2016,Period,2014,2016,2014,2016,One-time,13000,12000,14000,13000,,4333.333333,4333.333333,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species to Conabio in Mexico,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2956,TC,Mx1,"Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Producto No.1. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",Dr. Daniel A. Revollo Fernandez,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,"Valdez, M., Plascencia, A. y de Felipe, A. Especies exoticas invasoras que impactan ecosistemas forestales. En Principales retos que enfrenta Mexico ante las especies exoticas invasoras. Primera Edicion, 2017. Mexico, D.F.",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Prostigmata,Tenuipalpidae,Raoiella,Raoiella indica,,Acaro rojo de las palmas,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2013 - 2016,Period,2013,2017,2013,2017,One-time,207500,200000,215000,207500,,41500,41500,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species to Conabio in Mexico,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2957,TC,Mx1,"Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Producto No.1. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",Dr. Daniel A. Revollo Fernandez,NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,"Valdez, M., Plascencia, A. y de Felipe, A. Especies exoticas invasoras que impactan ecosistemas forestales. En Principales retos que enfrenta Mexico ante las especies exoticas invasoras. Primera Edicion, 2017. Mexico, D.F.",No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Hyblaeidae,Hyblaea,Hyblaea puera,,Teak defoliator,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2011 - 2015,Period,2011,2015,2011,2015,One-time,65000,60000,70000,65000,,13000,13000,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The report is a response to our request for data on the costs on invasive species to Conabio in Mexico,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2967,TC,Mx3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Cactoblastis,Cactoblastis cactorum,,Nopal moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,24229.61,,,1229.031017,2521.308717,24229.61,1229.031017,2521.308717,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2968,TC,Mx3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Cactoblastis,Cactoblastis cactorum,,Nopal moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5934.6,,,301.0286784,617.5484754,5934.6,301.0286784,617.5484754,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2969,TC,Mx3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Cactoblastis,Cactoblastis cactorum,,Nopal moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,6.43,,,0.326157517,0.669099298,6.43,0.326157517,0.669099298,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2970,TC,Mx3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Cactoblastis,Cactoblastis cactorum,,Nopal moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4753,,,241.0927962,494.5923741,4753,241.0927962,494.5923741,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Management (Unspecified),Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2971,TC,Mx3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Cactoblastis,Cactoblastis cactorum,,Nopal moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,514995000,154940000,875050000,26122782.36,53589858.98,514995000,26122782.36,53589858.98,MXN,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2972,TC,Mx3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,64866.5,,,3290.310512,6749.942402,64866.5,3290.310512,6749.942402,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2973,TC,Mx3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4695.45,,,238.1736103,488.6037793,4695.45,238.1736103,488.6037793,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Management (Unspecified),Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2974,TC,MX3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2497243500,743041000,4251446000,131944168.3,276219091.9,2497243500,131944168.3,276219091.9,MXN,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2975,TC,MX3,"Impacto economico potencial en ecosistemas forestales de Mexico, asi como un estudio de costo-beneficio del control de cinco especies exoticas invasoras: Euwallaceae sp., Xyleborus glabratus, Cactoblastis cactorum, Agrilus planipennis y Lymantria dispar. Proyecto 00089333 - FSP- ""Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Manejo de Especies Exoticas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI","Valera, V.,  Esquivel, M.",NA,2019,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Xyleborus,Xyleborus glabratus,,Redbay ambrosia beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,Mexico,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,7653300000,2277200000,13029400000,404369178.7,846528412.8,7653300000,404369178.7,846528412.8,MXN,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2992,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,96187,,,98235.88891,,96187,98235.88891,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2993,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,9701,,,9907.641971,,9701,9907.641971,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Decrease in carbon sequestration,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2994,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,101053,,,103205.5401,,101053,103205.5401,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Reparation of road infrastructure,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2996,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European wild rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Chile,,Islands Chanaral & Choros,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,26398,,,26960.30644,,26398,26960.30644,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2997,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European wild rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Chile,,Islands Chanaral & Choros,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,239941,,,245052.0072,,239941,245052.0072,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE2998,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European wild rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Chile,,Islands Chanaral & Choros,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2982998,,,3046539.139,,2982998,3046539.139,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts on native species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3000,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,14539809,,,14849522.93,,14539809,14849522.93,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impact on meat and dairy production,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3001,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1778430,,,1816312.515,,1778430,1816312.515,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impact on plantations of C. avellana,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3002,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,16646613,,,17001204.17,,16646613,17001204.17,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impact on soil composition and structure,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3003,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1896984,,,1937391.846,,1896984,1937391.846,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Predation of Araucaria seeds,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3004,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3416888,,,3489671.473,,3416888,3489671.473,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts on biodiversity components (Predation of vertebrate and insects species),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3007,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,8135449,,,8308743.013,,8135449,8308743.013,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impact on biodiversity components,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3008,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,9526620,,,9729547.486,,9526620,9729547.486,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Historic cost without especifying the amount of years,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3011,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespula,Vespula germanica,,Yellow jacket,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3199943,,,3268105.306,,3199943,3268105.306,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impact on the biodiversity components. Original name in document was Vespa germanica,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3012,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespula,Vespula germanica,,Yellow jacket,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4736148,,,4837033.162,,4736148,4837033.162,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impact on honey production. Original name in document was Vespa germanica,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3013,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespula,Vespula germanica,,Yellow jacket,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,8691868,,,8877014.35,,8691868,8877014.35,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impact on wine production. Original name in document was Vespa germanica,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3014,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespula,Vespula germanica,,Yellow jacket,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4895464,,,4999742.768,,4895464,4999742.768,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impact on prune production. Original name in document was Vespa germanica,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3015,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespula,Vespula germanica,,Yellow jacket,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,9348,,,9547.122683,,9348,9547.122683,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,State and private budget to control the species. Original name in document was Vespa germanica,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3021,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,Gorse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chiloe,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3619667,,,3696769.889,,3619667,3696769.889,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3022,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,Gorse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,334274,,,341394.4039,,334274,341394.4039,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3023,TC,CL1,Valoracion economica del impacto de siete especies exoticas invasoras sobre los sectores productivos y la biodiversidad en chile,"Cerda, C., Skewes, O., Cruz, G., Tapia, P., Araos,A., Baeriswyl, F., Critician, P.",NA,2016,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,Gorse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Chile,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,84830,,,86636.97232,,84830,86636.97232,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3025,TC,AR1,Control de pinos invasores en el parque provincial ernesto tornquist (Buenos Aires): Areas prioritarias y analisis de costos,"Cuevas, Y.A., Zalba, S.M.",NA,2009,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pinopsida,Pinales,Pinaceae,Pinus,Pinus halepensis,,Aleppo pine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,Argentina,,Ernesto Tornquist Provincial Park,Site,2009,Year,Unspecified,2009,2009,2009,One-time,68.405,0.01,136.8,78.15623924,,68.405,78.15623924,,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs per hectare for the fuel required for cutting down the pines in areas from low, medium and high densities of trees.  ",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3026,TC,EC1,Plan piloto para la erradicacion de Cenchrus pilosus especie invasora de limitada distribucion en la isla Santa Cruz- Galapagos,"Renteria, J.L.",NA,2006,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus pilosus,,Sanburs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz Island,Site,May 01/2006 - Jun 2007,Period,2006,2007,2006,2007,One-time,103.5,,,125.8478453,,51.75,62.92392264,,USD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3029,TC,CL4,Guia para el control de Hieracium pilosella para la region de magallanes y antartica chilena,"Radic, S., Ivelic, J., Gross, P., Ruiz, R., Munoz, R.",NA,2019,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Piosella,Pilosella officinarum,,Mouseear hawkweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Magallanes & Chilean antartica,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,27300,17500,37100,40.81659041,64.6532933,27300,40.81659041,64.6532933,CLP,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Reported values are per liter of herbicide to perform chemical control of the species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3040,Gs,PAR1,Impacto Economico del dengue en el Instituto de Prevision Social: epidemia diciembre 2006 - julio 2007,"Flores L., Gimenez Caballero E., Diaz Duba S., Torales J",NA,2015,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Paraguay,,Paraguay,Site,2006-2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2015,2015,One-time,2517045.1,,,2975643.171,,2517045.1,2975643.171,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3041,Go,PER1,Impacto Economico de la malaria en el Peru,Francke P,NA,2003,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Anopheles,Anopheles darlingi,,Mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Peru,,Peru,Country,1998,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2003,One-time,119512685,,,61335877.91,138396922.4,119512685,61335877.91,138396922.4,SOL,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3042,Scielo,COL1,"Costos de un programa de control del vector Aedes aegypti en municipios de Colombia: el caso de Giron y Guadalajara de Buga, 2016","Salinas-Lopez M.A., Soto-Rojas V.E., Ocampo C.B",NA,2018,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Guiron,Site,2016,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2018,2018,One-time,146651,,,149774.8276,,146651,149774.8276,,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3043,Scielo,COL1,"Costos de un programa de control del vector Aedes aegypti en municipios de Colombia: el caso de Giron y Guadalajara de Buga, 2016","Salinas-Lopez M.A., Soto-Rojas V.E., Ocampo C.B",NA,2018,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Guadalajara de Buga,Site,2016,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2018,2018,One-time,97936,,,100022.1445,,97936,100022.1445,,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3044,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2003","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,One-time,4210830,,,6430216.354,,4210830,6430216.354,,USD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3045,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2003","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,68762.2,,,103399.3874,,68762.2,103399.3874,,USD,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3046,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2003","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,112767.2,,,165939.9614,,112767.2,165939.9614,,USD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3047,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2003","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,40400.1,,,57507.8727,,40400.1,57507.8727,,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3048,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2003","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,90567.1,,,125375.206,,90567.1,125375.206,,USD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3049,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2003","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,101153,,,137843.398,,101153,137843.398,,USD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3050,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2003","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,18493.8,,,24642.49631,,18493.8,24642.49631,,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3051,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2004","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,One-time,65973.6,,,100746.0576,,65973.6,100746.0576,,USD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Indirect costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3052,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2004","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,98264.25,,,147762.3354,,98264.25,147762.3354,,USD,1998,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Indirect costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3053,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2004","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,172333.98,,,253594.077,,172333.98,253594.077,,USD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Indirect costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3054,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2004","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,94742.06,,,134861.4069,,94742.06,134861.4069,,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Indirect costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3055,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2004","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,235436,,,325922.2942,,235436,325922.2942,,USD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Indirect costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3056,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2004","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,177765.02,,,242244.2676,,177765.02,242244.2676,,USD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Indirect costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3057,Scielo,VEN1,"Impacto economico del dengue y del dengue hemorragico en el Estado de Zulia, Venezuela - 1997-2004","Anez G., Balza R., Valero N., Larreal Y",NA,2006,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Zulia,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,29310.93,,,39056.03415,,29310.93,39056.03415,,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Indirect costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3058,Go,EC2,Proyecto de control y erradicacion de especies invasoras prioritarias para la reduccion de la vulnerabilidad de especies endemicas y nativas de las islas Galapagos,"Parque Nacional Galapagos, Ministerio del ambiente",NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,Hill raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos,Site,2013-2017,Period,2013,2017,2013,2017,One-time,757000,,,757000,,151400,151400,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3060,Go,EC2,Proyecto de control y erradicacion de especies invasoras prioritarias para la reduccion de la vulnerabilidad de especies endemicas y nativas de las islas Galapagos,"Parque Nacional Galapagos, Ministerio del ambiente",NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Capra,Capra hircus,,Goat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos,Site,2013-2018,Period,2013,2017,2013,2017,One-time,972600,,,972600,,194520,194520,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3061,Go,EC2,Proyecto de control y erradicacion de especies invasoras prioritarias para la reduccion de la vulnerabilidad de especies endemicas y nativas de las islas Galapagos,"Parque Nacional Galapagos, Ministerio del ambiente",NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Anastrepha,Anastrepha fraterculus,,Southamerican fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos,Site,2013-2018,Period,2013,2017,2013,2017,One-time,635000,,,635000,,127000,127000,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3062,Go,EC2,Proyecto de control y erradicacion de especies invasoras prioritarias para la reduccion de la vulnerabilidad de especies endemicas y nativas de las islas Galapagos,"Parque Nacional Galapagos, Ministerio del ambiente",NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Muscidae,Philornis,Philornis downsi,,Philornis avian fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos,Site,2013-2018,Period,2013,2017,2013,2017,One-time,1596899,,,1596899,,319379.8,319379.8,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3063,Go,EC2,Proyecto de control y erradicacion de especies invasoras prioritarias para la reduccion de la vulnerabilidad de especies endemicas y nativas de las islas Galapagos,"Parque Nacional Galapagos, Ministerio del ambiente",NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos,Site,2013-2018,Period,2013,2017,2013,2017,One-time,475000,,,475000,,95000,95000,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3064,Go,EC2,Proyecto de control y erradicacion de especies invasoras prioritarias para la reduccion de la vulnerabilidad de especies endemicas y nativas de las islas Galapagos,"Parque Nacional Galapagos, Ministerio del ambiente",NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis geminata,,Fire ant: Tropical/black fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos,Site,2013-2018,Period,2013,2017,2013,2017,One-time,455000,,,455000,,91000,91000,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3065,Go,EC2,Proyecto de control y erradicacion de especies invasoras prioritarias para la reduccion de la vulnerabilidad de especies endemicas y nativas de las islas Galapagos,"Parque Nacional Galapagos, Ministerio del ambiente",NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Pulmonata,Achatinidae,Achatina,Achatina fulica,,Giant African land snail,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos,Site,2013-2018,Period,2013,2017,2013,2017,One-time,625000,,,625000,,125000,125000,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3066,Go,CU4,Impacto economico de la epidemia de dengue 2 en Santiago de Cuba -1997,"Dr. Valdes L.G., Dr. Vila Mizhrahi J., Dra. Guzman M.G",NA,2002,Spanish,Journal article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,Cuba,,Santiago,Site,1997,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,One-time,10251539.8,,,15654780.38,,10251539.8,15654780.38,,USD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3067,Go,AR3,Estudio de factibilidad de erradicar el castor americano (Castor canadensis) en la Patagonia,"ParkesJ.P., Paulson J., Donlan C.J., Campbell K",NA,2008,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Argentina/Chile,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2008,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2008,2008,One-time,32631000,,,37150042.96,,32631000,37150042.96,,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3068,Go,COL2,"Analisis costo-beneficio del control del dengue en el municipio de Magangu, Bolivar",Rodriguez Arana M.P,NA,2013,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Bolivar,Site,2013,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,One-time,3494740000,,,1967693.925,3088678.326,3494740000,1967693.925,3088678.326,COL,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Benefit value= 84046772 ,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3069,Go,COL2,"Analisis costo-beneficio del control del dengue en el municipio de Magangu, Bolivar",Rodriguez Arana M.P,NA,2013,Spanish,Thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Bolivar,Site,2013,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,One-time,15196112600,,,8556086.704,13430442.21,15196112600,8556086.704,13430442.21,COL,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Benefit value= 394266772,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3071,Go,URU1,Especies exoticas invasoras. Propuestaspara la estrategia a nivel del Sistema Nacional de areas Protegidas,Martino A.L,NA,2006,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Gleditsia,Gleditsia triacanthos,,Acacia negra,Aquatic/Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,Uruguay,,Estero de Farrapos,Site,2006,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,One-time,1500,,,1823.881816,,1500,1823.881816,,USD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost estimated per Ha. ,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3072,Go,URU1,Especies exoticas invasoras. Propuestaspara la estrategia a nivel del Sistema Nacional de areas Protegidas,Martino A.L,NA,2006,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Oleaceae,Ligustrum,Ligustrum lucidum,,Glossy privet,Aquatic/Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,Uruguay,,Humedal de Santa Lucia,Site,2006,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2006,2006,One-time,1200,,,1459.105452,,1200,1459.105452,,USD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost estimated per Ha. ,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3073,Go,COL4,"Carga de enfermedad y costos directos de atencion medica del dengue en la ciudad de Cartagena de indias, 2007-2011","Eljaik Zea A.A., Molina Palencia S.P",NA,2012,Spanish,Thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Cartagena,Site,2007-2011,Period,2007,2011,2007,2011,One-time,2253536877,,,1328748.707,2113514.088,450707375.4,265749.7414,422702.8177,COL,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3075,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,white leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Floreana,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,62000,,,73296.21411,,62000,73296.21411,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3076,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Syzygium,Syzygium jambos,,rose apple,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Floreana,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,10900,,,12885.94732,,10900,12885.94732,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3077,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,white leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Isabela,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,30500,,,36057.00856,,30500,36057.00856,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3081,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Isabela,Site,2007,Year,2001,2003,2001,2003,One-time,6000,,,7093.182011,,6000,7093.182011,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3082,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,gum arabic tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,405,,,478.7897857,,405,478.7897857,,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3083,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia elegans,,legant dutchman's pipe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,190,,,224.6174303,,190,224.6174303,,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3084,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia odoratissima,,fragrant dutchman's pipe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,5950,,,7034.072161,,5950,7034.072161,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3085,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia odoratissima,,fragrant dutchman's pipe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,23355,,,27610.21098,,23355,27610.21098,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3086,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia odoratissima,,fragrant dutchman's pipe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,5095,,,6023.293724,,5095,6023.293724,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3087,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia odoratissima,,fragrant dutchman's pipe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,19595,,,23165.15025,,19595,23165.15025,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3088,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia odoratissima,,fragrant dutchman's pipe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,1675,,,1980.179978,,1675,1980.179978,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3089,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia odoratissima,,fragrant dutchman's pipe,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,3350,,,3960.359956,,3350,3960.359956,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per year,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3090,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Casuarinaceae,Casuarina,Casuarina equisetifolia ,, beach casuarina,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,18650,,,22047.97408,,18650,22047.97408,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3091,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2000-2001,Period,2000,2001,2000,2001,One-time,17150,,,20274.67858,,8575,10137.33929,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3092,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2001-2002,Period,2001,2002,2001,2002,One-time,12200,,,14422.80342,,6100,7211.401711,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3093,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2002-2003,Period,2002,2003,2002,2003,One-time,16800,,,19860.90963,,8400,9930.454815,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3094,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2003-2004,Period,2003,2004,2003,2004,One-time,17600,,,20806.66723,,8800,10403.33362,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3095,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2004-2005,Period,2004,2005,2004,2005,One-time,16225,,,19181.14635,,8112.5,9590.573177,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3096,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2005-2006,Period,2005,2006,2005,2006,One-time,31975,,,37800.74913,,15987.5,18900.37457,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3097,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2006-2007,Period,2006,2007,2006,2007,One-time,16375,,,19358.4759,,8187.5,9679.237952,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3098,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,16000,,,18915.15203,,16000,18915.15203,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per year,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3099,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,Fiddlewood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,130000,,,153685.6102,,130000,153685.6102,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3100,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,414,,,489.4295588,,414,489.4295588,,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3101,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,rubber vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2006,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,650,,,768.4280512,,650,768.4280512,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Total cost for the eradication,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3102,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana montevidensis,,trailing lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2006,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,90,,,109.4329089,,90,109.4329089,,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3103,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,River tamarind,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,130000,,,153685.6102,,130000,153685.6102,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3104,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Pueraria,Pueraria phaseoloides,, tropical kudzu,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,1996,Year,1996,1996,1996,1996,One-time,794,,,938.6644194,,794,938.6644194,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3105,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Pueraria,Pueraria phaseoloides,, tropical kudzu,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,One-time,377,,,445.6882697,,377,445.6882697,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3106,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Pueraria,Pueraria phaseoloides,, tropical kudzu,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,151,,,178.5117473,,151,178.5117473,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3107,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Pueraria,Pueraria phaseoloides,, tropical kudzu,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,151,,,178.5117473,,151,178.5117473,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3108,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Pueraria,Pueraria phaseoloides,, tropical kudzu,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,151,,,178.5117473,,151,178.5117473,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3109,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,152,,,179.6939443,,152,179.6939443,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3110,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2007,2002,One-time,2463,,,2911.751215,,2463,2911.751215,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3111,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,86,,,101.6689422,,86,101.6689422,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3112,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,2006,,,2371.487186,,2006,2371.487186,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3113,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,2100,,,2482.613704,,2100,2482.613704,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3114,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,8550,,,10107.78437,,8550,10107.78437,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3115,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,9808,,,11594.98819,,9808,11594.98819,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3116,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,4501,,,5321.068705,,4501,5321.068705,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3117,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,5870,,,6939.496401,,5870,6939.496401,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3118,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,5154,,,6093.043347,,5154,6093.043347,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3119,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,5000,,,5910.985009,,5000,5910.985009,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3120,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus megalococcus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,416,,,491.7939528,,416,491.7939528,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3121,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus megalococcus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,558,,,659.665927,,558,659.665927,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3122,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus megalococcus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,3638,,,4300.832693,,3638,4300.832693,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3123,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus megalococcus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,545,,,644.297366,,545,644.297366,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3124,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus megalococcus,,Andean raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,279,,,329.8329635,,279,329.8329635,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3125,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus ulmifolius,,elmleaf blackberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,1075,,,1270.861777,,1075,1270.861777,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3126,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus ulmifolius,,elmleaf blackberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,3220,,,3806.674346,,3220,3806.674346,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3127,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus ulmifolius,,elmleaf blackberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,1580,,,1867.871263,,1580,1867.871263,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3128,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus ulmifolius,,elmleaf blackberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,815,,,963.4905565,,815,963.4905565,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3129,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus ulmifolius,,elmleaf blackberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,815,,,963.4905565,,815,963.4905565,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3130,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus ulmifolius,,elmleaf blackberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santa Cruz,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,14500,,,17141.85653,,14500,17141.85653,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Total Cost for eradication,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3132,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Laurales,Lauraceae,Persea,Persea americana,,avocado,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santiago,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,495,,,585.1875159,,495,585.1875159,,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3133,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,Mysore raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santiago,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,77640,,,91785.77522,,77640,91785.77522,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Monitoring with helicopter 2 times per year,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3134,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,Mysore raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santiago,Site,2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,43330,,,51224.59609,,43330,51224.59609,,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Terrestrial Monitoring,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3135,TC,EC4,Estrategias para la erradicacion de 21 especies de plantas potencialmente invasoras en Galapagos,"Renteria J.L., Atkinson R & Buddenhagen C",NA,2007,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Sapindaceae,Sapindus,Sapindus saponaria,,wingleaf soapberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos- Santiago,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,1485,,,1755.562548,,1485,1755.562548,,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3141,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,27402120000,,,14506312.63,28687907.04,27402120000,14506312.63,28687907.04,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Avocado ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3142,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2379172500,,,1259501.823,2490810.182,2379172500,1259501.823,2490810.182,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Cotton,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3143,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,5.452E+11,,,288621542.6,570782403.1,5.452E+11,288621542.6,570782403.1,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Rice,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3144,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,3277723680,,,1735182.695,3431523.992,3277723680,1735182.695,3431523.992,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Arracacha,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3145,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,56695156020,,,30013650.69,59355457.36,56695156020,30013650.69,59355457.36,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Banana,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3146,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,90736416450,,,48034634.69,94994032.58,90736416450,48034634.69,94994032.58,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Cacao,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3147,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2.60486E+11,,,137897956,272709119.3,2.60486E+11,137897956,272709119.3,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Sugar cane,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3148,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,71132202000,,,37656428.05,74469931.46,71132202000,37656428.05,74469931.46,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Coconut,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3149,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,40886989650,,,21645020.69,42805525.93,40886989650,21645020.69,42805525.93,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Beans (Frijol zona ladera),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3150,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,20374002900,,,10785722.26,21330010.28,20374002900,10785722.26,21330010.28,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Beans (Frijol zona Plano),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3151,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,39939358680,,,21143357.64,41813429.36,39939358680,21143357.64,41813429.36,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Corn (Maiz zona ladera),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3152,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1.60763E+11,,,85105995.54,168306926.1,1.60763E+11,85105995.54,168306926.1,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Corn (Maiz zona plano),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3153,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,66448339200,,,35176854.28,69566288.22,66448339200,35176854.28,69566288.22,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Potato,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3154,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,9.3985E+11,,,497544132.7,983950931.5,9.3985E+11,497544132.7,983950931.5,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Plantaine,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3155,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,17779502205,,,9412228.594,18613768.07,17779502205,9412228.594,18613768.07,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Sorghum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3156,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,31732570463,,,16798794.68,33221554.81,31732570463,16798794.68,33221554.81,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Soja,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3157,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,17355890160,,,9187974.092,18170278.92,17355890160,9187974.092,18170278.92,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Tabacco,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3158,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Arecales,Arecaceae,Elaeis,Elaeis guineensis,,oil palm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1.6857E+11,,,89238921.95,176480265,1.6857E+11,89238921.95,176480265,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Mandioca,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3159,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6697575000,,,3545605.844,7011844.666,6697575000,3545605.844,7011844.666,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Avocado ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3160,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,8414988750,,,4454781.513,8809844.456,8414988750,4454781.513,8809844.456,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Cotton,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3161,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1.28424E+11,,,67986007.6,134450174.6,1.28424E+11,67986007.6,134450174.6,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Rice,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3162,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,4214216160,,,2230949.179,4411959.419,4214216160,2230949.179,4411959.419,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Arracacha,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3163,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,22301199900,,,11805954.35,23347636.95,22301199900,11805954.35,23347636.95,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Cacao,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3164,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2.29733E+11,,,121617470.4,240512580.5,2.29733E+11,121617470.4,240512580.5,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Sugar cane,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3165,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,27600966000,,,14611579.02,28896083.47,27600966000,14611579.02,28896083.47,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Coconut,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3166,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,26770189500,,,14171777.15,28026324.52,26770189500,14171777.15,28026324.52,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Beans (Frijol zona ladera),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3167,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,52472837813,,,27778412.4,54935015.73,52472837813,27778412.4,54935015.73,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Beans (Frijol zona Plano),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3168,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,87836648220,,,46499536.51,91958198.8,87836648220,46499536.51,91958198.8,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Corn (Maiz zona ladera),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3169,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,37778857920,,,19999617.69,39551551.63,37778857920,19999617.69,39551551.63,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Corn (Maiz zona plano),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3170,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2.3387E+11,,,123807693.5,244843999.3,2.3387E+11,123807693.5,244843999.3,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Potato,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3171,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,3.78006E+11,,,200111426.8,395743436.4,3.78006E+11,200111426.8,395743436.4,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Plantaine,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3172,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,5191013520,,,2748052.523,5434590.947,5191013520,2748052.523,5434590.947,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Sorghum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3173,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,4312508850,,,2282984.003,4514864.287,4312508850,2282984.003,4514864.287,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Soja,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3174,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,9148123845,,,4842893.341,9577380.379,9148123845,4842893.341,9577380.379,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Tabacco,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3175,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pteridopsida,Pteridales,Dennstaedtiaceae,Pteridium,Pteridium aquilinum,,bracken,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,28578881250,,,15129274.16,29919885.34,28578881250,15129274.16,29919885.34,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Mandioca,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3176,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,14135498550,,,7483142.222,14798777.19,14135498550,7483142.222,14798777.19,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Avocado. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3177,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,975818750,,,516585.2809,1021606.999,975818750,516585.2809,1021606.999,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Cotton. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3178,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2.51835E+11,,,133318156.8,263652038,2.51835E+11,133318156.8,263652038,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Rice. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3179,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6922594980,,,3664728.386,7247423.237,6922594980,3664728.386,7247423.237,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Arracacha. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3180,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,21710755080,,,11493380.83,22729486.75,21710755080,11493380.83,22729486.75,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Banana. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3181,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,48758769450,,,25812234.71,51046672.49,48758769450,25812234.71,51046672.49,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Cacao. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3182,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2.9581E+11,,,156598022.7,309690659,2.9581E+11,156598022.7,309690659,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Sugar cane. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3183,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,67723776000,,,35852053.31,70901572.22,67723776000,35852053.31,70901572.22,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Coconut. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3184,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,42497266050,,,22497479.29,44491361.17,42497266050,22497479.29,44491361.17,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Beans (Frijol zona ladera). Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3185,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,73956137738,,,39151381.53,77426374.46,73956137738,39151381.53,77426374.46,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Beans (Frijol zona Plano). Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3186,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,96259178880,,,50958310.61,100775939.1,96259178880,50958310.61,100775939.1,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Corn (Maiz zona ladera). Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3187,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1.60534E+11,,,84984552.37,168066758.2,1.60534E+11,84984552.37,168066758.2,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Corn (Maiz zona plano). Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3188,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,4.18526E+11,,,221562198.1,438164811.7,4.18526E+11,221562198.1,438164811.7,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Potato. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3189,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,5.9914E+11,,,317176401.6,627252931.7,5.9914E+11,317176401.6,627252931.7,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Plantaine. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3190,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,10106746020,,,5350374.987,10580983.89,10106746020,5350374.987,10580983.89,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Sorghum. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3191,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,4312508850,,,2282984.003,4514864.287,4312508850,2282984.003,4514864.287,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Soja. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3192,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,11117691585,,,5885555.93,11639365.96,11117691585,5885555.93,11639365.96,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Tabacco. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3193,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1.29053E+11,,,68318781.42,135108273.2,1.29053E+11,68318781.42,135108273.2,COL,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for affecting the value of production of Mandioca. Original name in document was a synonym Pennisetum clandestinum,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3194,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,common water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2010,Year,2010,2040,2010,2040,One-time,27579410079,,,16329369.11,27702150.28,27579410079,16329369.11,27702150.28,COL,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Hydroelectric power plant. Annual economic cost in a period of 30 years in colombian pesos of 2010,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3198,TC,COL5,Lineamientos para la evaluacion del impacto economico de las plantas invasoras en Colombia,"Mendieta J.C., Cardenas Toro J",NA,2010,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,common water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Colombia,,Colombia,Country,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,10000000,9000000,11000000,5920.85511,10044.50429,10000000,5920.85511,10044.50429,COL,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3205,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,BioBio,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3366633,,,7152.425123,10130.39563,3366633,7152.425123,10130.39563,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3206,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,BioBio,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5130161,,,10899.04733,15436.95454,5130161,10899.04733,15436.95454,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Awareness campaign,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3207,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Araucania,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3405673,,,7235.365758,10247.86927,3405673,7235.365758,10247.86927,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3208,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Araucania,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,8384185,,,17812.23419,25228.5031,8384185,17812.23419,25228.5031,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Awareness campaign,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3209,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Los Rios,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2180021,,,4631.463236,6559.810709,2180021,4631.463236,6559.810709,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3210,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Los Rios,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,8337159,,,17712.32727,25086.99911,8337159,17712.32727,25086.99911,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Awareness campaign,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3211,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Los Lagos,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2429146,,,5160.730284,7309.442406,2429146,5160.730284,7309.442406,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3212,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Los Lagos,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,9453150,,,20083.25456,28445.08131,9453150,20083.25456,28445.08131,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Awareness campaign,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3213,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Aysen,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3132626,,,6655.276326,9426.254876,3132626,6655.276326,9426.254876,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3214,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Aysen,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,4640000,,,9857.698351,13962.03142,4640000,9857.698351,13962.03142,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Awareness campaign,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3215,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Magallanes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3983404,,,8462.757552,11986.29564,3983404,8462.757552,11986.29564,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3216,TC,CL5,Prospeccion de la especie plaga Didymosphenia geminata en cuerpos de agua de la zona centro-sur austral,Subsecretaria de pesca y acuicultura fondo de investigacion pesquera,NA,2015,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Bacillariophyceae,Cymbellales,Gomphonemataceae,Didymosphenia,Didymosphenia geminata,,didymo,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Chile,,Magallanes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3411859,,,7248.507939,10266.48331,3411859,7248.507939,10266.48331,CLP,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Awareness campaign,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3217,TC,CL6,"Analisis de costos iniciales de un proyecto de restauracion ecologica de los bosques siempreverde de cordillera de la costa, Region de los Rios, Chile.",Cardenas Moll J.P,NA,2016,Spanish,Thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus globulus,,southern blue gum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,Chile,,Reserva costera Valdiviana,Unit (43.7 ha),2011-2012,Period,2011,2012,2011,2012,One-time,643739,,,677348.09,,321869.5,338674.045,,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Harvesting,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost of the first stage of the utilization plan ,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3218,TC,CL6,"Analisis de costos iniciales de un proyecto de restauracion ecologica de los bosques siempreverde de cordillera de la costa, Region de los Rios, Chile.",Cardenas Moll J.P,NA,2016,Spanish,Thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus globulus,,southern blue gum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,Chile,,Reserva costera Valdiviana,Unit (50.6 ha),2012-2013,Period,2012,2013,2012,2013,One-time,1031203,,,1085041.271,,515601.5,542520.6353,,USD,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Harvesting,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Actual cost of the second stage of the utilization plan ,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3221,TC,AR5,Especies alienigenas invasoras en Sudamerica Informes Nacionales & Directorio de Recursos," Ziller S.R.,  Reaser J.K., Neville L.E & Brand K",NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,1300000,,,1800535.763,2874729.343,1300000,1800535.763,2874729.343,ARS,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3222,TC,AR5,Especies alienigenas invasoras en Sudamerica Informes Nacionales & Directorio de Recursos," Ziller S.R.,  Reaser J.K., Neville L.E & Brand K",NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,1100000,,,1523530.261,2432463.29,1100000,1523530.261,2432463.29,ARS,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Management (Unspecified),Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,"Operative costs, investments, consultories and supplies",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3223,TC,AR5,Especies alienigenas invasoras en Sudamerica Informes Nacionales & Directorio de Recursos," Ziller S.R.,  Reaser J.K., Neville L.E & Brand K",NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Anastrepha,Anastrepha fraterculus,,fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2005,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,9970000,,,4309670.512,11626974.4,9970000,4309670.512,11626974.4,ARS,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3224,TC,AR5,Especies alienigenas invasoras en Sudamerica Informes Nacionales & Directorio de Recursos," Ziller S.R.,  Reaser J.K., Neville L.E & Brand K",NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Anastrepha,Anastrepha fraterculus,,fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,78500000,67000000,90000000,33932711.65,91546388.19,78500000,33932711.65,91546388.19,ARS,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3225,TC,AR5,Especies alienigenas invasoras en Sudamerica Informes Nacionales & Directorio de Recursos," Ziller S.R.,  Reaser J.K., Neville L.E & Brand K",NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Cydia,Cydia pomonella,,codling moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Patagonia,Site,2005,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,500000,,,216131.9214,583098.014,500000,216131.9214,583098.014,ARS,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3226,TC,AR5,Especies alienigenas invasoras en Sudamerica Informes Nacionales & Directorio de Recursos," Ziller S.R.,  Reaser J.K., Neville L.E & Brand K",NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Cydia,Cydia pomonella,,codling moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Patagonia,Site,2005,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,3500,,,1512.92345,4081.686098,3500,1512.92345,4081.686098,ARS,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Costs  per rejected truck with fruits infected with larvae,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3227,TC,AR5,Especies alienigenas invasoras en Sudamerica Informes Nacionales & Directorio de Recursos," Ziller S.R.,  Reaser J.K., Neville L.E & Brand K",NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Siricidae,Sirex,Sirex noctilio,,woodwasp,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,5 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2000,2005,One-time,3835442,,,1657922.897,4472877.226,639240.3333,276320.4829,745479.5376,ARS,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3228,Gs,GISP1,Programa Mundial sobre Especies Invasoras,Sue Matthews,NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa jacobsoni,,Varroa mite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,434.5,267,602,545.3610017,,434.5,545.3610017,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Beekeeping. Original name in document was a synonym: Varroa destructor,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3230,Gs,GISP1,Programa Mundial sobre Especies Invasoras,Sue Matthews,NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,,United States,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,19000000000,,,23847776830,23847776830,19000000000,23847776830,23847776830,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3231,Gs,GISP1,Programa Mundial sobre Especies Invasoras,Sue Matthews,NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asiatic clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,,Arkansas,Site,1980,Year,1980,1980,1980,1980,One-time,4500000,,,13385031.35,,4500000,13385031.35,,USD,1980,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Nuclear plant ,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3232,Gs,GISP1,Programa Mundial sobre Especies Invasoras,Sue Matthews,NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Pulmonata,Achatinidae,Achatina,Achatina fulica,,giant African snail,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,,Hawai,Site,1966,Year,1966,1966,1966,1966,One-time,1000000,,,6682042.254,,1000000,6682042.254,,USD,1969,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3233,Gs,GISP1,Programa Mundial sobre Especies Invasoras,Sue Matthews,NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Pipidae,Xenopus,Xenopus laevis,,African clawed frog,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Venezuela,,Venezuela,Country,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,1640,,,2185.256353,,1640,2185.256353,,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost paid to hunt 4700 individuals,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3234,Gs,GISP1,Programa Mundial sobre Especies Invasoras,Sue Matthews,NA,2005,Spanish,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Anthonomus,Anthonomus grandis,,boll weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,,United States,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,75000000,,,94135961.17,94135961.17,75000000,94135961.17,94135961.17,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3235,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,week 1 to 36 of 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1033320,,,1033320,,1033320,1033320,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Dengue,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3236,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Jan 01 2016 - Sept 11 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,4800178,,,4800178,,4800178,4800178,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Dengue,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3237,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Jan 01 2016 - Sept 11 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3685500,,,3685500,,3685500,3685500,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Dengue,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3238,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Jan 01 2016 - Sept 11 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,212277,,,212277,,212277,212277,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for diagnostic of Chikunguya,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3239,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Jan 01 2016 - Sept 11 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,77260,,,77260,,77260,77260,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of treatment of Chikunguya,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3240,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Jan 01 2016 - Sept 11 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,56110,,,56110,,56110,56110,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Chikunguya,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3241,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Jan 01 2016 - Sept 11 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,12400,,,12400,,12400,12400,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost for diagnostic of Zika,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3242,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Jan 01 2016 - Sept 11 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,6170,,,6170,,6170,6170,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of treatment of Zika,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3243,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Jan 01 2016 - Sept 11 2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3530,,,3530,,3530,3530,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Zika,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3244,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,541460,,,541460,,541460,541460,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3245,TC,AR6,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mosquito tigre (Aedes aegypti) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,13204875,,,13204875,,13204875,13204875,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3246,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3028500,,,3028500,,3028500,3028500,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Lost of value for 12114 ha.,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3247,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,30582970,,,30582970,,30582970,30582970,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Forests,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3248,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,76012,,,76012,,76012,76012,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Peatlands (1083 ha affected),Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3249,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,165976,,,165976,,165976,165976,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Livestock production,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3250,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,51946,,,51946,,51946,51946,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Peatland exploitation,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3251,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,11982,,,11982,,11982,11982,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Peatlands Production/Tax loss,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3252,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,31334375,,,31334375,,31334375,31334375,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Carbon sink,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3253,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,196126,,,196126,,196126,196126,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3254,TC,AR7,Informe Individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Castor (castor Canadensis) en Argentina.,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,North American beaver,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Tierra del Fuego,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,1109086,,,1109086,,1109086,1109086,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Information,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pilot study,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3255,TC,AR8,Evaluacion del costo potencial asociado a la expansion de tamarisco (tamarix sp) y estornino pinto (sturnus vulgaris) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Sturnidae,Sturnus,Sturnus vulgaris,,Common starling,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,131213353,,,134008341.8,,131213353,134008341.8,,USD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3262,TC,AR9,Informe individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Jabali (Sus scrofa) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,One-time,1143611284,906878765,1380343803,1143611284,,1143611284,1143611284,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Costs in scenarios with low to medium abundance of the species (Annual),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3263,TC,AR9,Informe individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Jabali (Sus scrofa) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,One-time,1149917365,910857365,1388977365,1149917365,,1149917365,1149917365,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Includes damage to production, intrusion to the explotaitions, predation and damages to crops, infrastructure and stockpiles (annual)",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3264,TC,AR9,Informe individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Jabali (Sus scrofa) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,Argentina,,El Palmar National Park,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,31360,,,31360,,31360,31360,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3265,TC,AR9,Informe individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Jabali (Sus scrofa) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,113065,,,113065,,113065,113065,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Investment made by (CONICET).,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3266,TC,AR9,Informe individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Jabali (Sus scrofa) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Wild boar,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,One-time,920,,,920,,920,920,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per imprinted puppy (for hunting),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3268,TC,AR10,Informe individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Wakame (Unduria pinnatifida) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Japanese kelp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,164000,,,164000,,164000,164000,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3269,TC,AR10,Informe individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Wakame (Unduria pinnatifida) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Japanese kelp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,One-time,4490,,,4490,,4490,4490,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual costs in aquaculture activity,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3272,TC,AR11,Informe individual sobre costos relacionados con la invasion de Mejillon Dorado (Limnoperna fortunei) en Argentina,FAO; FMAM; Estrategia Nacional sobre Especies Invasoras;Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible,NA,2017,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Mytilida,Mytilidae,Limnoperna,Limnoperna fortunei,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Argentina,,Argentina,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,343100,,,343100,,343100,343100,,USD,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra,Yes
NE3273,TC,MX7,Resultados de la implementacion del plan piloto para el control de rana toro y tilapia panza roja,"Martinez-Rodriguez, A. L., Martinez-Rodriguez, J. M. & Flores-Garcia, E.",NA,2018,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,San Ignacio/Municipio de Mulege/Baja California Sur,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,66100,,,3352.878988,6878.299165,66100,3352.878988,6878.299165,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Tecnical assistance,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3274,TC,MX7,Resultados de la implementacion del plan piloto para el control de rana toro y tilapia panza roja,"Martinez-Rodriguez, A. L., Martinez-Rodriguez, J. M. & Flores-Garcia, E.",NA,2018,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,San Ignacio/Municipio de Mulege/Baja California Sur,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,29604,,,1501.643412,3080.562307,29604,1501.643412,3080.562307,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Materials,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3275,TC,MX7,Resultados de la implementacion del plan piloto para el control de rana toro y tilapia panza roja,"Martinez-Rodriguez, A. L., Martinez-Rodriguez, J. M. & Flores-Garcia, E.",NA,2018,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Cichlidae,Coptodon,Coptodon zillii,,Redbreast tilapia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,San Ignacio/Municipio de Mulege/Baja California Sur,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,77000,,,3905.774312,8012.542143,77000,3905.774312,8012.542143,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Tecnical assistance. Original name in document was a synonym: Tilapia zillii,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3276,TC,MX7,Resultados de la implementacion del plan piloto para el control de rana toro y tilapia panza roja,"Martinez-Rodriguez, A. L., Martinez-Rodriguez, J. M. & Flores-Garcia, E.",NA,2018,Spanish,Report,NA,No,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Cichlidae,Coptodon,Coptodon zillii,,Redbreast tilapia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Mexico,,San Ignacio/Municipio de Mulege/Baja California Sur,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,32318,,,1639.309276,3362.978402,32318,1639.309276,3362.978402,MXN,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Materials. Original name in document was a synonym: Tilapia zillii,Virginia G. Duboscq-Carra/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3280,TC,URU5,Respuesta de Ernesto Brugnoli sobre costos de sus proyectos en relacion a especies invasoras,Ernesto Brugnoli,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Serpulidae,Ficopomatus,Ficopomatus enigmaticus,,Australian tubeworm,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Uruguay,,Montevideo,Site,2009-2010,Year,2009,2010,2009,2010,One-time,427103,,,23934.72015,33547.40957,427103,23934.72015,33547.40957,UYU,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"research project: Diagnostico y estrategias de control de las especies generadoras de macrofouling en el reservorio de abastecimiento de agua para refrigeracion de la Refineria ANCAP-La Teja. Montevideo. Financiacion: ANCAP (Administracion Nacional de Cemento Alcohol y Portland)- Empresa Publica, Uruguay",Elena Angulo,No
NE3282,TC,URU5,Respuesta de Ernesto Brugnoli sobre costos de sus proyectos en relacion a especies invasoras,Ernesto Brugnoli,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Mytilida,Mytilidae,Limnoperna,Limnoperna fortunei,,Mejillon dorado,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Uruguay,,Uruguay River,Site,2017-2019,Year,2017,2019,2017,2019,One-time,992965,,,34626.55703,45432.99606,992965,34626.55703,45432.99606,UYU,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Research project: Interaccion entre el mejillon invasor Limnoperna fortunei y la comunidad de peces nativos: efectos desde los individuos a los ecosistemas Financiamiento:Agencia Nacional de Investigacion e Innovacion (ANII),Elena Angulo,No
NE3283,TC,URU5,Respuesta de Ernesto Brugnoli sobre costos de sus proyectos en relacion a especies invasoras,Ernesto Brugnoli,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Mytilida,Mytilidae,Limnoperna,Limnoperna fortunei,,Mejillon dorado,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Uruguay,,Uruguay River,Site,2016-2018,Year,2016,2018,2016,2018,One-time,48000,,,46855.51502,,48000,46855.51502,,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration/Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Research project: Rol de los peces en la invasion del mejillon dorado (Limnopernafortunei) en el Rio Uruguay: consecuencias en ecologia trofica y fisiologia de peces. Financiamiento: Beca de posdoctorado nacional ANII (ANII PD NAC_2015_1_108121).,Elena Angulo,No
NE3284,TC,URU5,Respuesta de Ernesto Brugnoli sobre costos de sus proyectos en relacion a especies invasoras,Ernesto Brugnoli,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Mytilida,Mytilidae,Limnoperna,Limnoperna fortunei,,Mejillon dorado,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Uruguay,,Uruguay River,Site,2016-2018,Year,2016,2018,2016,2018,One-time,2489289,,,79085.93535,107896.0759,2489289,79085.93535,107896.0759,UYU,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Research project: Limnoperna fortunei (mejillon dorado) en las presas y embalses del Rio Negro, grado de invasion y aplicacion de metodos de control mecanico Financiamiento: Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica (UdelaR)-UTE (Empresa Publica estatal)",Elena Angulo,No
NE3285,TC,URU5,Respuesta de Ernesto Brugnoli sobre costos de sus proyectos en relacion a especies invasoras,Ernesto Brugnoli,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Mytilida,Mytilidae,Limnoperna,Limnoperna fortunei,,Mejillon dorado,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,Uruguay,,Uruguay River,Site,2016-2018,Year,2016,2018,2016,2018,One-time,48000,,,1524.983598,2080.518431,48000,1524.983598,2080.518431,UYU,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Management/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Research project: SIMPOSIO CIENTIFICO-TECNICO Ecologia y manejo del molusco invasor Limnoperna fortunei (mejillon dorado) en Uruguay Financiamiento: Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientifica (UdelaR),Elena Angulo,No
NE3286,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Sapindaceae,Acer,Acer negundo,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Bourgogne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,13000,,,18166.95404,16853.12315,13000,18166.95404,16853.12315,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Grand Chalon, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3293,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,891869,,,1223349.082,1127772.234,891869,1223349.082,1127772.234,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DASS, communes, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Monitoring, Surveillance, Communication, Education, Research, Control, Eradication",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3294,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1783737,,,2492697.545,2312426.103,1783737,2492697.545,2312426.103,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DASS, communes, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Monitoring, Surveillance, Communication, Education, Research, Control, Eradication",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3295,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,480000,,,670779.8413,622269.1626,480000,670779.8413,622269.1626,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3296,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Corsica Island,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3579550,,,5002270.794,4640507.46,3579550,5002270.794,4640507.46,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3297,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,480000,,,670779.8413,622269.1626,480000,670779.8413,622269.1626,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3298,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,60000,,,83847.48016,77783.64532,60000,83847.48016,77783.64532,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3299,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Midi-Pyrénées,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,480000,,,670779.8413,622269.1626,480000,670779.8413,622269.1626,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3300,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,480000,,,670779.8413,622269.1626,480000,670779.8413,622269.1626,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3301,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Rhône-Alpes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,480000,,,670779.8413,622269.1626,480000,670779.8413,622269.1626,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3302,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,Mayotte,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2013508,,,2813792.868,2610299.869,2013508,2813792.868,2610299.869,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3303,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,300000,,,478083.2482,397276.1208,300000,478083.2482,397276.1208,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3304,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,300000,,,447077.6251,394564.9607,300000,447077.6251,394564.9607,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3305,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,300000,,,455050.3543,388554.3769,300000,455050.3543,388554.3769,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3306,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,300000,,,411500.7076,379351.3064,300000,411500.7076,379351.3064,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3307,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5283001,,,7382772.026,6848851.267,5283001,7382772.026,6848851.267,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3308,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,10000,,,15168.34514,12951.81256,10000,15168.34514,12951.81256,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CREN Poitou Charentes, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3309,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,10000,,,13716.69025,12645.04355,10000,13716.69025,12645.04355,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CREN Poitou Charentes, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3310,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,882,,,1232.557958,1143.419586,882,1232.557958,1143.419586,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CREN Poitou Charentes, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3311,TC,FR23,Gestion de la Spartine alterniflore en rade de Brest (Finistère),"Larzillière, A.",NA,2016,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,smooth cordgrass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Brest,Unit (8076 ha),2011-2015,Period,2011,2015,2011,2015,Potentially ongoing,7430,,,8399.476555,9548.545337,1486,1679.895311,1909.709067,EUR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Manual removal of the species, the costs only cover the materiat, but does not include the human costs (118 persons for a total of 17 working days); Rade de Brest – estuaire de l’Aulne » et « Rade de Brest – Baie de Daoulas – Anse de Poulmic ». original name indocument was synonyms (Spartina alterniflora)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3312,TC,FR18,Manuel de gestion des plantes exotiques envahissant les milieux aquatiques et les berges du bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Haury J., Hudin S., Matrat R., Anras L., et al. ",NA,2010,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône-Alpes,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,60000000,,,89415525.02,78912992.14,60000000,89415525.02,78912992.14,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Direct medical cost,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Annual costs mainly from mid-August to mid-september,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3313,TC,FR20,Stratégie de lutte contre les espèces invasives menaçant la biodiversité en Basse-Normandie,"Mercier, F.",NA,2013,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Rhône-Alpes,Site,2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,122000,,,170489.8763,158160.0788,122000,170489.8763,158160.0788,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control/Eradication/Direct medical cost,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Eradication, education, pharmaceutical treatment of allergies (source: ADEFA)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3314,TC,FR27,"Diagnostic des espèces exotiques envahissantes animales et végétales du territoire du PNR des préAlpes d'Azur, et création d'outils de sensibilisation","POGGI, J.",NA,2013,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,N,Europe,France,,France,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,30000,,,41923.74008,38891.82266,30000,41923.74008,38891.82266,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The value corresponds to the yearly cost of surveillance of the plant in France (inventories,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3315,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Bourgogne,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,10000,,,14902.5875,13152.16536,10000,14902.5875,13152.16536,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DREAL Bourgogne, details of the funders available in the source excel file, costs of communication of the results",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3316,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1000,,,1516.834514,1295.181256,1000,1516.834514,1295.181256,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Syndicat mixte Gardons, details of the funders available in the source excel file, costs of communication of the results, mowing before flowering",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3317,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1000,,,1371.669025,1264.504355,1000,1371.669025,1264.504355,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Syndicat mixte Gardons, details of the funders available in the source excel file, costs of communication of the results, mowing before flowering",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3318,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1000,,,1397.458003,1296.394089,1000,1397.458003,1296.394089,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Syndicat mixte Gardons, details of the funders available in the source excel file, costs of communication of the results, mowing before flowering",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3319,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7500,,,10287.51769,9483.78266,7500,10287.51769,9483.78266,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBNA et CBNMed, details of the funders available in the source excel file, costs of communication of the results, actions 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3320,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7500,,,10287.51769,9483.78266,7500,10287.51769,9483.78266,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CBNA et CBNMed, details of the funders available in the source excel file, costs of communication of the results",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3321,TC,FR10,Animation et déclinaison du plan régional de lutte contre l’ambroisie en Auvergne,Fredon Auvergne,NA,2018,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Auvergne,Site,2014-2017,Period,2014,2017,2014,2017,One-time,19578,,,22569.44978,24668.67582,4894.5,5642.362446,6167.168955,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Education/Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,2 sites en PNR et 22 communautés de commuanes,David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3322,TC,FR10,Animation et déclinaison du plan régional de lutte contre l’ambroisie en Auvergne,Fredon Auvergne,NA,2018,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Auvergne,Site,2014-2017,Period,2014,2017,2014,2017,One-time,343877,,,396420.2004,433291.9724,85969.25,99105.05009,108322.9931,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Control/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,2 sites en PNR et 22 communautés de commuanes,David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3323,TC,FR30,"Vers un système d'information sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données sanitaires, environnementales et bilan des actions de lutte menées en 2008","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Montestrucq L, Sonko A, Dreneau M",NA,2010,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,674301,,,1129076.095,870514.8862,674301,1129076.095,870514.8862,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (237615 euros), medical consultation (243232 euros), biological tests (14010), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (33875 euros), job stopped (145570 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3324,TC,FR30,"Vers un système d'information sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données sanitaires, environnementales et bilan des actions de lutte menées en 2008","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Montestrucq L, Sonko A, Dreneau M",NA,2010,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,510185,,,854273.815,658643.0054,510185,854273.815,658643.0054,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (210943 euros), medical consultation (178129 euros), biological tests (7402 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (18966 euros), job stopped (94745 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3325,TC,FR30,"Vers un système d'information sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données sanitaires, environnementales et bilan des actions de lutte menées en 2008","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Montestrucq L, Sonko A, Dreneau M",NA,2010,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,916209,,,1534136.358,1182815.35,916209,1534136.358,1182815.35,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (387218 euros), medical consultation (333616 euros), biological tests (11853 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (34732 euros), job stopped (148790 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3326,TC,FR30,"Vers un système d'information sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données sanitaires, environnementales et bilan des actions de lutte menées en 2008","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Montestrucq L, Sonko A, Dreneau M",NA,2010,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,1854364,,,3105019.961,2393962.735,1854364,3105019.961,2393962.735,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (645621 euros), medical consultation (644406 euros), biological tests (33491), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (90171 euros), job stopped (440675 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3327,TC,FR30,"Vers un système d'information sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données sanitaires, environnementales et bilan des actions de lutte menées en 2008","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Montestrucq L, Sonko A, Dreneau M",NA,2010,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,877108,,,1468664.107,1132336.406,877108,1468664.107,1132336.406,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (325672 euros), medical consultation (317119 euros), biological tests (16054 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (60312 euros), job stopped (157951 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3328,TC,FR30,"Vers un système d'information sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données sanitaires, environnementales et bilan des actions de lutte menées en 2008","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Montestrucq L, Sonko A, Dreneau M",NA,2010,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,2767146,,,4633418.015,3572353.868,2767146,4633418.015,3572353.868,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (1028829 euros), medical consultation (1025997 euros), biological tests (49849 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (109458 euros), job stopped (553012 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3329,TC,FR30,"Vers un système d'information sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données sanitaires, environnementales et bilan des actions de lutte menées en 2008","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Montestrucq L, Sonko A, Dreneau M",NA,2010,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,340619,,,570345.8404,439735.237,340619,570345.8404,439735.237,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (127283 euros), medical consultation (122121 euros), biological tests (6094 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (13778 euros), job stopped (71344 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3330,TC,FR30,"Vers un système d'information sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données sanitaires, environnementales et bilan des actions de lutte menées en 2008","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Montestrucq L, Sonko A, Dreneau M",NA,2010,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,617854,,,1034559.02,797642.4542,617854,1034559.02,797642.4542,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (211687 euros), medical consultation (226176 euros), biological tests (15467 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (38318 euros), job stopped (126205 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3338,TC,FR31,"2ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des donnés médico-économiques, environnementales, et enquête auprès des collectivités territoriales","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Anzivino-Viricel L, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2011,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,855210,,,1362871.916,1132515.038,855210,1362871.916,1132515.038,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (252845 euros), medical consultation (302207 euros), biological tests (16039), sensitivity tests (24578 euros), drufs for decreasing sensitivity (86550 euros) job stopped (172990 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3339,TC,FR31,"2ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des donnés médico-économiques, environnementales, et enquête auprès des collectivités territoriales","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Anzivino-Viricel L, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2011,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,695083,,,1107691.795,920466.2597,695083,1107691.795,920466.2597,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (210790 euros), medical consultation (211584 euros), biological tests (7497 euros), tests for sensitivity (14095 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (145110 euros), job stopped (106009 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3340,TC,FR31,"2ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des donnés médico-économiques, environnementales, et enquête auprès des collectivités territoriales","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Anzivino-Viricel L, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2011,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1294844,,,2063477.418,1714702.005,1294844,2063477.418,1714702.005,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (414297 euros), medical consultation (416378 euros), biological tests (12964 euros), sensitivity tests (25015 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (225250 euros), job stopped (200940 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3341,TC,FR31,"2ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des donnés médico-économiques, environnementales, et enquête auprès des collectivités territoriales","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Anzivino-Viricel L, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2011,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,2559673,,,4079122.608,3389656.534,2559673,4079122.608,3389656.534,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (669024 euros), medical consultation (791705 euros), biological tests (38963 euros), sensitivity tests (80577 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (455221 euros), job stopped (524182 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3342,TC,FR31,"2ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des donnés médico-économiques, environnementales, et enquête auprès des collectivités territoriales","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Anzivino-Viricel L, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2011,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1225664,,,1953231.421,1623090.131,1225664,1953231.421,1623090.131,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (329306 euros), medical consultation (388017 euros), biological tests (16370 euros), sensitivity tests (46217 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (239794), job stopped (205960 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3343,TC,FR31,"2ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des donnés médico-économiques, environnementales, et enquête auprès des collectivités territoriales","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Anzivino-Viricel L, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2011,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,3859004,,,6149750.558,5110300.465,3859004,6149750.558,5110300.465,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (1115382 euros), medical consultation (1295523 euros), biological tests (61834 euros), sensitivity tests (97775 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (506328 euros), job stopped (782162 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3344,TC,FR31,"2ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des donnés médico-économiques, environnementales, et enquête auprès des collectivités territoriales","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Anzivino-Viricel L, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2011,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,509899,,,812580.5673,675235.6558,509899,812580.5673,675235.6558,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (128968 euros), medical consultation (160921 euros), biological tests (7178 euros), sensitivity tests (10926 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (108464 euros), job stopped (93441 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3345,TC,FR31,"2ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des donnés médico-économiques, environnementales, et enquête auprès des collectivités territoriales","ORS Rhône-Alpes, Anzivino-Viricel L, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2011,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,824061,,,1313232.532,1091265.858,824061,1313232.532,1091265.858,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care / Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Medication (210096 euros), medical consultation (274504 euros), biological tests (16983 euros), sensitivity tests (25789 euros), treatment for decreasing sensitivity (133092 euros), job stopped (163597 euros)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3346,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,273469,,,407539.5702,359670.9508,273469,407539.5702,359670.9508,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3347,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,210682,,,313970.6941,277092.4502,210682,313970.6941,277092.4502,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3348,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,408768,,,609170.0889,537618.4328,408768,609170.0889,537618.4328,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3349,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,745566,,,1111086.256,980580.7316,745566,1111086.256,980580.7316,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3350,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,381640,,,568742.3495,501939.2387,381640,568742.3495,501939.2387,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3351,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1211238,,,1805058.028,1593040.246,1211238,1805058.028,1593040.246,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3352,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,150067,,,223638.6599,197370.5999,150067,223638.6599,197370.5999,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3353,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,266447,,,397074.9733,350435.5003,266447,397074.9733,350435.5003,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3354,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,468265,,,710280.5138,606488.051,468265,710280.5138,606488.051,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3355,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,329251,,,499419.2807,426439.7238,329251,499419.2807,426439.7238,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3356,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,619380,,,939496.9615,802209.3666,619380,939496.9615,802209.3666,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3357,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1307376,,,1983073.04,1693288.89,1307376,1983073.04,1693288.89,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3358,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,659952,,,1001037.971,854757.4605,659952,1001037.971,854757.4605,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3359,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,2050689,,,3110555.853,2656013.955,2050689,3110555.853,2656013.955,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3360,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,288752,,,437988.9997,373986.1781,288752,437988.9997,373986.1781,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3361,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,484935,,,735566.1452,628078.7225,484935,735566.1452,628078.7225,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Medical consultation,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3362,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,14318,,,21337.52479,18831.27036,14318,21337.52479,18831.27036,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3363,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,7297,,,10874.4181,9597.135061,7297,10874.4181,9597.135061,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3364,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,13825,,,20602.82722,18182.86861,13825,20602.82722,18182.86861,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3365,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,38620,,,57553.79294,50793.66261,38620,57553.79294,50793.66261,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3366,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,17350,,,25855.98932,22819.00689,17350,25855.98932,22819.00689,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3367,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,56775,,,84609.44055,74671.41881,56775,84609.44055,74671.41881,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3368,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,6973,,,10391.57427,9171.004903,6973,10391.57427,9171.004903,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3369,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,17325,,,25818.73285,22786.12648,17325,25818.73285,22786.12648,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3370,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,19309,,,29288.55764,25008.65488,19309,29288.55764,25008.65488,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3371,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,8551,,,12970.45193,11075.09492,8551,12970.45193,11075.09492,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3372,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,15938,,,24175.30849,20642.59886,15938,24175.30849,20642.59886,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3373,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,49006,,,74333.99221,63471.65265,49006,74333.99221,63471.65265,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3374,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,19628,,,29772.42785,25421.8177,19628,29772.42785,25421.8177,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3375,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,72594,,,110113.0847,94022.38812,72594,110113.0847,94022.38812,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3376,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,10437,,,15831.20183,13517.80677,10437,15831.20183,13517.80677,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3377,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,21932,,,33267.21457,28405.91531,21932,33267.21457,28405.91531,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Biological tests (Ige tests),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3378,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,19314,,,28782.85751,25402.09217,19314,28782.85751,25402.09217,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3379,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,14064,,,20958.99907,18497.20536,14064,20958.99907,18497.20536,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3380,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,24959,,,37195.36815,32826.48951,24959,37195.36815,32826.48951,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3381,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,74416,,,110899.0952,97873.15372,74416,110899.0952,97873.15372,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3382,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,48928,,,72915.38014,64350.91466,48928,72915.38014,64350.91466,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3383,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,94161,,,140324.2542,123842.1042,94161,140324.2542,123842.1042,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3384,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,10356,,,15433.11962,13620.38244,10356,15433.11962,13620.38244,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3385,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,25270,,,37658.83862,33235.52186,25270,37658.83862,33235.52186,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3386,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,31073,,,47132.59886,40245.16718,31073,47132.59886,40245.16718,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3387,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,19484,,,29554.00368,25235.3116,19484,29554.00368,25235.3116,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3388,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,35385,,,53673.18929,45829.98876,35385,53673.18929,45829.98876,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3389,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,102055,,,154800.5464,132179.7231,102055,154800.5464,132179.7231,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3390,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,63927,,,96966.67999,82797.05217,63927,96966.67999,82797.05217,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3391,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,135954,,,206219.7196,176085.0725,135954,206219.7196,176085.0725,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3392,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,12904,,,19573.23257,16713.01893,12904,19573.23257,16713.01893,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3393,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,32560,,,49388.13179,42171.10171,32560,49388.13179,42171.10171,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization and allergological tests,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3394,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,144262,,,214987.7079,189735.7679,144262,214987.7079,189735.7679,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3395,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,108310,,,161409.9253,142451.103,108310,161409.9253,142451.103,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3396,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,224569,,,334665.9173,295356.8622,224569,334665.9173,295356.8622,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3397,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,492191,,,733491.9446,647337.7419,492191,733491.9446,647337.7419,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3398,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,207685,,,309504.3886,273150.7462,207685,309504.3886,273150.7462,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3399,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,752767,,,1121817.609,990051.6059,752767,1121817.609,990051.6059,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3400,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,89730,,,133720.9177,118014.3797,89730,133720.9177,118014.3797,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3401,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,141917,,,211493.0511,186651.5851,141917,211493.0511,186651.5851,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3402,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,258653,,,392333.7976,335002.5175,258653,392333.7976,335002.5175,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3403,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,145874,,,221266.7179,188933.2706,145874,221266.7179,188933.2706,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3404,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,290737,,,440999.9162,376557.1129,290737,440999.9162,376557.1129,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3405,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,772770,,,1172164.208,1000877.219,772770,1172164.208,1000877.219,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3406,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,308478,,,467910.0773,399534.9236,308478,467910.0773,399534.9236,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3407,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1033068,,,1566993.198,1338010.31,1033068,1566993.198,1338010.31,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3408,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,133825,,,202990.3789,173327.6316,133825,202990.3789,173327.6316,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3409,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,257899,,,391190.1044,334025.9508,257899,391190.1044,334025.9508,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,work stoppage,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3410,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,159389,,,237530.852,209631.0484,159389,237530.852,209631.0484,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3411,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,317781,,,473575.916,417950.8259,317781,473575.916,417950.8259,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3412,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,378063,,,563411.694,497234.7091,378063,563411.694,497234.7091,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3413,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,810809,,,1208315.207,1066389.404,810809,1208315.207,1066389.404,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3414,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,460554,,,686344.6285,605728.2364,460554,686344.6285,605728.2364,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3415,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1015045,,,1512679.693,1335003.968,1015045,1512679.693,1335003.968,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3416,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,167620,,,249797.1717,220456.5957,167620,249797.1717,220456.5957,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3417,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,224341,,,334326.1383,295056.9928,224341,334326.1383,295056.9928,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3418,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,178283,,,270425.8077,230908.7999,178283,270425.8077,230908.7999,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3419,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,267252,,,405377.0576,346139.7811,267252,405377.0576,346139.7811,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3420,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,425283,,,645083.9327,550818.5702,425283,645083.9327,550818.5702,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3421,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,963243,,,1461080.228,1247574.279,963243,1461080.228,1247574.279,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3422,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,496748,,,753484.5113,643378.6987,496748,753484.5113,643378.6987,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3423,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1145805,,,1737996.571,1484025.159,1145805,1737996.571,1484025.159,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3424,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,201973,,,306359.6174,261591.6439,201973,306359.6174,261591.6439,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3425,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,287796,,,436538.9059,372747.9849,287796,436538.9059,372747.9849,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Desensitization treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3426,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,23761,,,35410.03817,31250.8601,23761,35410.03817,31250.8601,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3427,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,11930,,,17778.78689,15690.53327,11930,17778.78689,15690.53327,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3428,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,26650,,,39715.3957,35050.52068,26650,39715.3957,35050.52068,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3429,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,60456,,,90095.08302,79512.73088,60456,90095.08302,79512.73088,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3430,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,29879,,,44527.4412,39297.35487,29879,44527.4412,39297.35487,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3431,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,94372,,,140638.6988,124119.6149,94372,140638.6988,124119.6149,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3432,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,11000,,,16392.84625,14467.38189,11000,16392.84625,14467.38189,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3433,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,18113,,,26993.05675,23822.51711,18113,26993.05675,23822.51711,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3434,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ain,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,36474,,,55325.02207,47240.44114,36474,55325.02207,47240.44114,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3435,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ardèche,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,19354,,,29356.81519,25066.93804,19354,29356.81519,25066.93804,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3436,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Drôme,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,38412,,,58264.64736,49750.50242,38412,58264.64736,49750.50242,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3437,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Isère,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,94784,,,143771.6426,122762.4602,94784,143771.6426,122762.4602,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3438,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,48308,,,73275.24172,62567.61613,48308,73275.24172,62567.61613,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3439,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Rhône,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,152236,,,230916.8191,197173.2137,152236,230916.8191,197173.2137,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3440,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,17594,,,26687.18644,22787.41902,17594,26687.18644,22787.41902,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3441,TC,FR32,3ème rapport sur l'Ambroisie en région Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,"ORS Rhône-Alpes, Fontaine D, Sonko A",NA,2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia polystachya,,Ambroisie annuelle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Haute-Savoie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,31394,,,47619.50274,40660.92036,31394,47619.50274,40660.92036,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Asthme treatments (drugs),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3442,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Apidae,Apis,Apis mellifera,,Honey bee,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,3352,,,5341.783494,4438.898524,3352,5341.783494,4438.898524,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,ASBO,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3443,TC,FR25,L'impact sanitaire de l'ambroisie en Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes : analyse des données médico-économiques 2017,Observatoire régional de la santé Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes,NA,2017,French,Official report,"Réalisation d'un recueil d'expériences de gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes en milieux aquatiques en France métropolitaine, Rapport de stage de fin d'étude (Université Toulouse Paul Sabatier), Sandra Fernandez, 2012/2013.",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,Potentially ongoing,40600000,,,45865055.76,52348325.24,40600000,45865055.76,52348325.24,EUR,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Global health cost suported by households due to Ambrosia allergy,Tasnime Adamjy/David Renault,Yes
NE3444,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Giant reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2012-2015,Period,2012,2015,2012,2015,One-time,3200,,,3688.948785,4032.064696,800,922.2371961,1008.016174,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Cost of grinding on a large area to be treated (between 100 and 1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3445,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Giant reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2015-2016,Period,2015,2016,2015,2016,One-time,4500,,,5187.584228,5670.090979,2250,2593.792114,2835.04549,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3446,TC,FR16,Evaluation économique de la gestion des espèces invasives: valoriser le bénévolat,Dutartre A.,NA,2016,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Etel Estuary,Unit (River),2010-2016,Period,2010,2016,2010,2016,Potentially ongoing,222104,,,251084.4335,285433.3935,31729.14286,35869.20478,40776.19907,EUR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"eradication (manual), 218 persons, 13.5 days in total",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3447,TC,FR2,Gestion du baccharis sur les marais de l’île de Noirmoutier,"Communauté de communes de l’île de Noirmoutier (CCN),  et Syndicat mixte d’aménagement des marais de Noirmoutier (SMAM)",NA,2017,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,8,Y,Europe,France,,Noirmoutier,Unit (232 ha),2009 - 2013,Period,2009,2013,2009,2013,One-time,108915,,,123039.2253,140431.474,21783,24607.84507,28086.2948,EUR,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment,Control/Eradication/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"The reported cost is the total value of the whole campaing. Arrachage manuel, coupe, salage et brûlage. Suivi et entretien des opérations
antérieures. Natura 2000",David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3448,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,500,,,576.3982476,630.0101088,500,576.3982476,630.0101088,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Reported costs are per day of work on a extensive area to be treated (Manual uprooting; between 100 and 1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3449,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2011-2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,7.62,,,8.784309293,9.601354058,2.54,2.928103098,3.200451353,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs per hectare on scattered feet of surface to be treated (between 0 - 1m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3450,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,600,,,691.6778971,756.0121305,600,691.6778971,756.0121305,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Reported value is a flat rate for the job.,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3451,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2011-2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,11.94,8.36,15.52,13.76439015,15.0446414,3.98,4.588130051,5.014880466,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs per hectare on scattered feet of surface to be treated (between 0 - 1m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3452,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2010-2012,Period,2010,2012,2010,2012,One-time,175,100,250,201.7393867,220.5035381,58.33333333,67.24646222,73.50117936,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Annual costs for sheep care on pastures invaded,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3453,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Réservoirs de Piraillan,Site,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,991,,,1659.369348,1279.369676,991,1659.369348,1279.369676,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Removal of the species (manual control) BUT, doesn't include human costs (89 hours)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3454,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Réservoirs de Piraillan,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,191,,,261.9887839,241.5203317,191,261.9887839,241.5203317,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Removal of the species (manual control) BUT, doesn't include human costs (18 hours)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3455,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Prés Salés d'Arès - Lège - Cap Ferret,Unit (13ha),2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,92550.93,,,126949.244,117031.054,92550.93,126949.244,117031.054,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Removal of the species (manual and mechanical eradication),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3456,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Basque Country,Basque Country,Unit (1ha),2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,8621,,,11825.15867,13243.58218,8621,11825.15867,13243.58218,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Removal of the species (manual and mechanical eradication, chemical treatment)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3457,TC,FR3,La gestion du baccharis à feuille d’arroche sur les marais de Guérande et du Mès,Communauté d’agglomération Cap Atlantique (CDACA),NA,2017,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Marais de Guèrande et du Mès,Unit (2500 ha),2004 - 2012,Year,2004,2012,2004,2012,Potentially ongoing,15000,,,16945.21765,19340.51425,15000,16945.21765,19340.51425,EUR,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment/Public and social welfare,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The reported value is the cost per year of the control and eradication actions. The eradication actios are: Arrachage manuel, Arrachage mécanique, gyrobroyage, coupe, salage, dévitalisation de la souche. Marais salais de guerade",David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3463,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,15989,,,25480.24352,21173.49299,15989,25480.24352,21173.49299,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3464,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,36459,,,54333.34378,47951.47967,36459,54333.34378,47951.47967,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3465,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,34280.57,,,51997.95175,44399.55172,34280.57,51997.95175,44399.55172,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3466,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15054.37,,,20649.61303,19036.31642,15054.37,20649.61303,19036.31642,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3467,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Pallas'e Squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,100000,,,159361.0827,132425.3736,100000,159361.0827,132425.3736,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3468,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Pallas'e Squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,110000,,,163928.4625,144673.8189,110000,163928.4625,144673.8189,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN/Ministère de l'Ecologie,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3469,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Pallas'e Squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,121500,,,184295.3935,157364.5226,121500,184295.3935,157364.5226,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN/Ministère de l'Ecologie,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3470,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Pallas'e Squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,125000,,,171458.6282,158063.0443,125000,171458.6282,158063.0443,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN/Ministère de l'Ecologie,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3471,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Pallas'e Squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,125000,,,174682.2503,162049.2611,125000,174682.2503,162049.2611,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN/Ministère de l'Ecologie,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3472,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,American beaver,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1539,,,2334.408317,1993.283954,1539,2334.408317,1993.283954,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3473,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Castoridae,Castor,Castor canadensis,,American beaver,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3709,,,5087.520415,4690.046651,3709,5087.520415,4690.046651,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3474,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asparagales,Iridaceae,Chasmanthe,Chasmanthe bicolor,,Red-and-green cobra lily,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1250,,,1714.586282,1580.630443,1250,1714.586282,1580.630443,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3475,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas-grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,416.67,,,571.5333328,526.8810294,416.67,571.5333328,526.8810294,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Syndicat mixte pour la gestion du domaine de la palissade. Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3476,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,225,,,259.3792114,283.504549,225,259.3792114,283.504549,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Costs per day/man of work on a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3477,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,225,,,259.3792114,283.504549,225,259.3792114,283.504549,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs per day/man of work for administrate a thermic treatment on a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3478,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,16.17,,,18.64071933,20.37452692,16.17,18.64071933,20.37452692,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs per m3 of mechanical eradication in a very large area to be treated (>1000m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3479,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,20,,,23.0559299,25.20040435,20,23.0559299,25.20040435,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per kg of the chemical Dyofix for eradication in a very large area to be treated (>1000m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3480,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,50,,,57.63982476,63.00101088,50,57.63982476,63.00101088,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per m3 of mechanical eradication in a large area to be treated (between 100 - 1000 m3),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3481,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Australian swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,Netherlands,,Breda,Site,2012-2013,Period,2012,2013,2012,2013,Potentially ongoing,84200,,,117665.9638,110999.4833,42100,58832.98191,55499.74164,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Removal of the species (mechanical and chemical removal, surveillance)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3482,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Cygnus,Cygnus atratus,,Black swan,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Midi-Pyrénées,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,592,,,882.2331802,778.6081891,592,882.2331802,778.6081891,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3483,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,90000,,,125771.2202,116675.468,90000,125771.2202,116675.468,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3484,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,23333,,,34772.20742,30687.94743,23333,34772.20742,30687.94743,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Dreal,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3485,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,16666,,,25279.56402,21585.49082,16666,25279.56402,21585.49082,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Dreal,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3491,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Lorraine,Site,2009-  2013,Period,2009,2014,2009,2014,One-time,24000,,,33013.11126,30771.39266,4000,5502.18521,5128.565443,EUR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs are per year in the 5 year period,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3492,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,130000,,,197188.4869,168373.5633,130000,197188.4869,168373.5633,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3493,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,200000,,,274333.8051,252900.8709,200000,274333.8051,252900.8709,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3494,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,110000,,,153720.3803,142603.3498,110000,153720.3803,142603.3498,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3495,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,29000,,,43988.20091,37560.25643,29000,43988.20091,37560.25643,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3496,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,29000,,,39778.40174,36670.62628,29000,39778.40174,36670.62628,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3497,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pondweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,29000,,,40526.28208,37595.42857,29000,40526.28208,37595.42857,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3498,TC,FR7,Gestion de l’Elodée de Nuttall sur le plan d’eau de l’île Charlemagne,Mairie d'Orléans,NA,2016,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea nuttallii,,Nuttall's Waterweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Orléans,Unit (15 ha),40725,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,17700,,,20009.52019,22746.87113,17700,20009.52019,22746.87113,EUR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment/Public and social welfare,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Unesco, Natura2000",David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3499,TC,FR7,Gestion de l’Elodée de Nuttall sur le plan d’eau de l’île Charlemagne,Mairie d'Orléans,NA,2016,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea nuttallii,,Nuttall's Waterweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Orléans,Unit (15 ha),41091,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,31351,,,35441.72133,40290.23484,31351,35441.72133,40290.23484,EUR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment/Public and social welfare,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3500,TC,FR7,Gestion de l’Elodée de Nuttall sur le plan d’eau de l’île Charlemagne,Mairie d'Orléans,NA,2016,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea nuttallii,,Nuttall's Waterweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Orléans,Unit (15 ha),41456,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,17047,,,19271.31586,21907.67865,17047,19271.31586,21907.67865,EUR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment/Public and social welfare,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3501,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1223.49,,,1410.434984,1541.622136,1223.49,1410.434984,1541.622136,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Harvesting,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per km a long the water body in a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3502,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,843.9,,,972.8449623,1063.331062,843.9,972.8449623,1063.331062,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Harvesting,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per km a long the water body in a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3503,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1938.87,,,2235.122541,2443.015399,1938.87,2235.122541,2443.015399,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Harvesting,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per km a long the water body in a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3504,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2368.36,,,2730.237107,2984.181482,2368.36,2730.237107,2984.181482,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Harvesting,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per km a long the water body in a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3505,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2013-2015,Period,2013,2015,2013,2015,One-time,16.965,14.7,19.23,19.55719254,21.37624299,5.655,6.51906418,7.12541433,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per m2 in a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3506,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2012-2014,Period,2012,2014,2012,2014,One-time,59000,,,68014.99321,74341.19284,19666.66667,22671.6644,24780.39761,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,In a large area to be treated (between 100 - 1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3507,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2011-2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,37.75,,,43.51806769,47.56576321,12.58333333,14.50602256,15.8552544,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per ml of laying of nets for mechanical uprooting on a large area to be treated. (between 100 - 1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3508,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Egeria,Egeria densa,,Brazilian elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,19.99,,,23.04440194,25.18780415,19.99,23.04440194,25.18780415,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per ml of laying of nets  in a large area to be treated (100 -1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3509,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,French Polynesia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,5000,,,7451.293752,6576.082678,5000,7451.293752,6576.082678,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Information/Prevention/Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PF-Société d'Ornithologie de Polynésie, details of the funders available in the Excel sheet",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3510,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,French Polynesia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,5000,,,7584.172571,6475.906282,5000,7584.172571,6475.906282,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Information/Prevention/Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PF-Société d'Ornithologie de Polynésie, details of the funders available in the Excel sheet",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3511,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,French Polynesia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,25000,,,34291.72564,31612.60887,25000,34291.72564,31612.60887,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Information/Prevention/Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PF-Société d'Ornithologie de Polynésie, details of the funders available in the Excel sheet",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3512,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,French Polynesia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25000,,,34936.45007,32409.85222,25000,34936.45007,32409.85222,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Information/Prevention/Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PF-Société d'Ornithologie de Polynésie, details of the funders available in the Excel sheet",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3513,TC,FR19,Atlas des especes invasives presentes sur le perimetre du Parc Naturel regional de Camargue,"Costa, C.",NA,2005,French,Atlas,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Serpulidae,Ficopomatus,Ficopomatus enigmaticus,,Tube worm,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Camargue Regional Natural Park,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,250,,,390.3787786,342.3905266,250,390.3787786,342.3905266,EUR,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Annual cost ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3514,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Iridaceae,Freesia,Freesia alba,,white freesia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1250,,,1714.586282,1580.630443,1250,1714.586282,1580.630443,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3515,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Cannabaceae,Humulopsis,Humulopsis scandens,,Japanese hop,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,10.57,,,12.18505895,13.3184137,10.57,12.18505895,13.3184137,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per m2 in an area between 10-100m2. Original name was a synonym: Humulus japonicus,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3516,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Cannabaceae,Humulopsis,Humulopsis scandens,,Japanese hop,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,4000,,,5589.832011,5185.576355,4000,5589.832011,5185.576355,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Syndicat mixte des Gardons . Original name was a synonym: Humulus japonicus,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3517,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Cousturet river,Unit (7km),2012-2013,Period,2012,2013,2012,2013,Potentially ongoing,12825,,,17922.39888,16626.25419,6412.5,8961.199442,8313.127094,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Removal of the species, manual removal for a total of 67,5 human.month",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3518,TC,FR6,Un plan de lutte contre l’Hydrocotyle fausse renoncule sur le Dhuy,Syndicat Intercommunal du Bassin du Loiret (SIBL),NA,2015,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Water pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Dhuy River (Loiret),Unit (14 km),2012-2015,Period,2012,2015,2012,2015,One-time,202310,,,232139.0567,258790.0988,50577.5,58034.76417,64697.52471,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Education,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,The total value of of the whole campaing was 64545 Euros but 44237 was allocated to eradication. Therefore this is the total value for Control and education. ,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3519,TC,FR6,Un plan de lutte contre l’Hydrocotyle fausse renoncule sur le Dhuy,Syndicat Intercommunal du Bassin du Loiret (SIBL),NA,2015,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Water pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Dhuy River (Loiret),Unit (14 km),2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,4515,,,6193.08565,5709.237161,4515,6193.08565,5709.237161,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Manual eradication (total of 116 days over the 3 years of project),David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3520,TC,FR6,Un plan de lutte contre l’Hydrocotyle fausse renoncule sur le Dhuy,Syndicat Intercommunal du Bassin du Loiret (SIBL),NA,2015,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Water pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Dhuy River (Loiret),Unit (14 km),2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,8360,,,11682.7489,10837.85458,8360,11682.7489,10837.85458,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Manual eradication (total of 116 days over the 3 years of project),David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3521,TC,FR6,Un plan de lutte contre l’Hydrocotyle fausse renoncule sur le Dhuy,Syndicat Intercommunal du Bassin du Loiret (SIBL),NA,2015,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Water pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Dhuy River (Loiret),Unit (14 km),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,10400,,,14305.68155,13334.27015,10400,14305.68155,13334.27015,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Manual eradication (total of 116 days over the 3 years of project),David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3522,TC,FR6,Un plan de lutte contre l’Hydrocotyle fausse renoncule sur le Dhuy,Syndicat Intercommunal du Bassin du Loiret (SIBL),NA,2015,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Water pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Dhuy River (Loiret),Unit (14 km),May-Oct 2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,20960,,,28750.18277,26504.01127,20960,28750.18277,26504.01127,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Mechanical eradication.,David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3523,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Iguanidae,Iguana,Iguana iguana,,Green Iguana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Guadeloupe,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,30000,,,47808.32482,39727.61208,30000,47808.32482,39727.61208,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, Association Ti-Tè, DéAL. Destruction of the removed species",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3524,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Iguanidae,Iguana,Iguana iguana,,Green Iguana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Saint-Martin,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,2000,,,3033.669029,2590.362513,2000,3033.669029,2590.362513,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3525,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Iguanidae,Iguana,Iguana iguana,,Green Iguana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Saint-Martin,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1000,,,1371.669025,1264.504355,1000,1371.669025,1264.504355,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3526,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Iguanidae,Iguana,Iguana iguana,,Green Iguana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Saint-Martin,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3000,,,4192.374008,3889.182266,3000,4192.374008,3889.182266,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONCFS,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3530,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,African elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,500,,,576.3982476,630.0101088,500,576.3982476,630.0101088,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per day of manual uprooting on a large area to be treated (100 - 1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3531,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,African elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,350,,,403.4787733,441.0070761,350,403.4787733,441.0070761,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Pilot plan for drain a pond,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3532,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,African elodea,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,566,,,652.4828163,713.1714431,566,652.4828163,713.1714431,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Draining the pond,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3533,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,Oxygen weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Etang Blanc,Unit (183ha),1998-2013,Period,1998,2013,1998,2013,Potentially ongoing,1148000,,,1604281.787,1488260.414,71750,100267.6117,93016.27586,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Removal of the species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3534,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,Oxygen weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,Ireland,,Lac Corrib,Unit (17800ha),2005-2008,Period,2005,2008,2005,2008,Potentially ongoing,400000,,,669775.7206,482182.3807,100000,167443.9301,120545.5952,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Removal of the species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3535,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,Oxygen weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,Ireland,,Lac Corrib,Unit (17800ha),2009-2012,Period,2009,2012,2009,2012,Potentially ongoing,1500000,,,2057503.538,1945678.43,375000,514375.8845,486419.6075,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Removal of the species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3536,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,Oxygen weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,Ireland,,Lac Corrib,Unit (17800ha),2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,300000,,,419237.4008,389117.1855,300000,419237.4008,389117.1855,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Removal of the species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3537,TC,FR26,Manuel de gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes du bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Varray S., Haury J., Hudin, S. et al",NA,2018,French,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,La Sologne,Site,2009-2017,Period,2009,2017,2009,2017,One-time,600000,,,691677.8971,756012.1305,66666.66667,76853.09968,84001.34784,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The project started in 2002 but only got funded from 2009. Pag. 114,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE3538,TC,FR26,Manuel de gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes du bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Varray S., Haury J., Hudin, S. et al",NA,2018,French,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,La Sologne,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2018,2018,One-time,55000,50000,60000,63403.80723,69301.11197,55000,63403.80723,69301.11197,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per year for about 30-35 persons managing the eradication actions. Pag 117,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE3539,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,La Sologne,Site,2009-2012,Period,2009,2012,2009,2012,One-time,326795,,,374978.4145,418028.3246,81698.75,93744.60362,104507.0811,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Total cost of the program minus the cost for the environmental DNA analysis that is related in the line below. Pag. 160,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3540,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,La Sologne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,15850,,,22149.70934,20547.84631,15850,22149.70934,20547.84631,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Fishery,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Costs of the environmental DNA analysis with 85 kits analyzed. Pag160.,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3541,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Amy Pound. Vancouver Island/British Columbia,Unit (0.4 km),2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,2200,,,3564.385064,2143.989894,2200,3564.385064,2143.989894,EUR,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pag. 163,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3542,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Amy Pound. Vancouver Island/British Columbia,Unit (0.4 km),2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,2700,,,4520.986114,2490.234849,2700,4520.986114,2490.234849,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pag. 163,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3543,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Amy Pound. Vancouver Island/British Columbia,Unit (0.4 km),2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1400,,,2231.055158,1331.523237,1400,2231.055158,1331.523237,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pag. 163,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3544,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Glen Lake,Unit (2 km),2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,4400,,,7128.770128,4287.979787,4400,7128.770128,4287.979787,EUR,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pag. 163,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3545,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Glen Lake,Unit (2 km),2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,4400,,,7367.532926,4058.160494,4400,7367.532926,4058.160494,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pag. 163,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3546,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Glen Lake,Unit (2 km),2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2000,,,3187.221655,1902.176052,2000,3187.221655,1902.176052,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Pag. 163,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3547,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,13500,,,21513.74617,17877.42544,13500,21513.74617,17877.42544,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Syndicat d'entretien du bassin du Beuvron, ONCFS et Comité départemental de protection de la nature et de l'environnement",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3548,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,97000,,,144555.0988,127576.004,97000,144555.0988,127576.004,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Syndicat d'entretien du bassin du Beuvron, ONCFS et Comité départemental de protection de la nature et de l'environnement",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3549,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,79500,,,120588.3439,102966.9099,79500,120588.3439,102966.9099,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Syndicat d'entretien du bassin du Beuvron, ONCFS et Comité départemental de protection de la nature et de l'environnement",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3550,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,59500,,,81614.30701,75238.0091,59500,81614.30701,75238.0091,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Syndicat d'entretien du bassin du Beuvron, ONCFS et Comité départemental de protection de la nature et de l'environnement",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3551,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,American bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,52700,,,73646.03674,68319.96847,52700,73646.03674,68319.96847,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Syndicat d'entretien du bassin du Beuvron, ONCFS et Comité départemental de protection de la nature et de l'environnement",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3553,TC,FR12,Réaction rapide suite à la découverte de la Jussie à petites fleurs (Ludwigia peploides) dans un plan d’eau de Guirande,"Syndicat mixte du bassin Célé Lot-médian, CBN Pyrénées Midi Pyrénées",NA,2019,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia peploides,,Water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Felzins,Unit (280 m²),2014-2018,Period,2014,2018,2014,2018,One-time,10300,,,11662.4557,12747.1857,2060,2332.491141,2549.437141,EUR,2019,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Manual eradication (total of 47 days over the 5 years of project, including the work of the volunteers)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3645,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Lycium,Lycium barbarum,,Barbary matrimony-vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,625,,,857.2931409,790.3152216,625,857.2931409,790.3152216,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Centre Régional de la Propriété Forestière de PACA.Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3646,TC,FR8,Arrachage de la Berce du Caucase dans un jardin,Fredon Bretagne,NA,2018,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,La Prénessaye,Unit (215m²),2017-2018,Period,2017,2018,2017,2018,One-time,1600,,,1844.474392,2016.032348,800,922.2371961,1008.016174,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,The total costs are split as: 600 Eur initially and then 500 EUR per each year,David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3647,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Atlantique,Site,2004 - 2010,Period,2004,2010,2004,2010,One-time,900,,,1032.698092,1151.25841,128.5714286,147.5282989,164.4654872,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Cost per km cover in a navigable area to conduct control activities. Pag. 214,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3648,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Nutria,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Gironde,Site,2006-2013,Period,2006,2013,2006,2013,One-time,80000,,,91795.38597,102334.0809,10000,11474.42325,12791.76011,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs since 2006 broken down as: 50000 en material and 30000 for compensation for trappers and operations. Pag. 216,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3649,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Ragodin,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,500,,,796.8054137,662.1268681,500,796.8054137,662.1268681,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Collectivité locale. Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3650,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Ragodin,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,500,,,745.1293752,657.6082678,500,745.1293752,657.6082678,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Collectivité locale. Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3651,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Ragodin,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,500,,,758.4172571,647.5906282,500,758.4172571,647.5906282,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Collectivité locale. Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3652,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Ragodin,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,500,,,685.8345127,632.2521773,500,685.8345127,632.2521773,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Collectivité locale.Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3653,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Ragodin,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5000,,,6987.290014,6481.970443,5000,6987.290014,6481.970443,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Collectivité locale.Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3684,TC,FR22,Bilan économique de la gestion des plantes envahissantes dans le Bassin Loire – Bretagne. Propositions pour 2007-2012,Agence de l'eau Loire-Bretagne,"On ne s’étonnera pas que dans la lignée des précédentes tentatives, il soit fort difficile de procéder à un bilan économique fiable de la gestion des plantes envahissantes. Même si la situation s’est améliorée en 2006 par rapport aux années précédentes, les retours d’informations financiers demeurent fragmentaires; qui plus est, la globalisation de différentes tâches au sein d’un même prix, n’aide pas à la bonne identification des coûts. Au demeurant, nous avons pu, même si elle est sujette à concertation, élaborer cette mercuriale de prix qui devrait aider les gestionnaires et bailleurs de fonds, à budgétiser leurs actions. Mais surtout, il va s’agir désormais de profiter des enseignements passés, pour mener à bien la gestion des envahissantes, au cours des années à venir. Sur le principe, il va falloir continuer d’inscrire cette gestion dans la durée, année après année mais souvent aussi par des interventions répétées au cours de l’année.",2007,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian water-milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Hyrôme River/ Maine-et-Loire,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,3000,,,4860.525087,3986.58658,3000,4860.525087,3986.58658,EUR,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 18. les deux seules données chiffrées émanent du Maine-et-Loire, sur la rivière Hyrôme : (…) Dans la mesure où la seconde donnée est aberrante, un coût de 750 € TTC le mètre cube s’apparente aux évaluations financières faites pour la jussie.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3685,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian water-milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3.48,,,4.011731803,4.384870357,3.48,4.011731803,4.384870357,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per ml of uprooting manual and mechanical on a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3686,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,Brazilian water-milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,10,,,11.52796495,12.60020218,10,11.52796495,12.60020218,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per ml of uprooting manual and mechanical on a very large area to be treated (>1000 m2),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3687,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,parrot feather,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Marais du Jaunay et du Gué-Gorand,Unit (570ha),2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,30654.87,,,42048.33566,38763.2166,30654.87,42048.33566,38763.2166,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Removal of the species (manual and mechanical removal),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3688,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,parrot feather,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Marais de Chicheboville-Bellengreville,Unit (150ha),2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,70000,,,97822.06019,90747.58621,70000,97822.06019,90747.58621,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Removal of the species (mechanical removal),David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3689,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Country,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,17000,,,23756.78605,22038.69951,17000,23756.78605,22038.69951,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Ecosystem restoration/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Métropole, pas de données sur le site, ni la région, geotextile Installation",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3690,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,16667,,,24838.14259,21920.714,16667,24838.14259,21920.714,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3691,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,16667,,,25281.08085,21586.786,16667,25281.08085,21586.786,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3692,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,16667,,,22861.60765,21075.49408,16667,22861.60765,21075.49408,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3693,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Midi-Pyrénées,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,16667,,,24838.14259,21920.714,16667,24838.14259,21920.714,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3694,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Midi-Pyrénées,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,16667,,,25281.08085,21586.786,16667,25281.08085,21586.786,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3695,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Midi-Pyrénées,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,16667,,,22861.60765,21075.49408,16667,22861.60765,21075.49408,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3696,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,16667,,,24838.14259,21920.714,16667,24838.14259,21920.714,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3697,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,16667,,,25281.08085,21586.786,16667,25281.08085,21586.786,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3698,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,16667,,,22861.60765,21075.49408,16667,22861.60765,21075.49408,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,VNF,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3699,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,3500,,,5577.637896,4634.888077,3500,5577.637896,4634.888077,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/ Control/Eradication/ Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, CPIE, PNR, communes, privés",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3700,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,3500,,,5215.905626,4603.257875,3500,5215.905626,4603.257875,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/ Control/Eradication/ Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, CPIE, PNR, communes, privés",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3701,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,10100,,,15320.02859,13081.33069,10100,15320.02859,13081.33069,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/ Control/Eradication/ Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, CPIE, PNR, communes, privés",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3702,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,8000,,,10973.3522,10116.03484,8000,10973.3522,10116.03484,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/ Control/Eradication/ Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, CPIE, PNR, communes, privés",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3703,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,95560,,,133541.0867,123883.4191,95560,133541.0867,123883.4191,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/ Control/Eradication/ Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, CPIE, PNR, communes, privés",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3704,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,Mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Midi-Pyrénées,Site,2011 - 2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,44849,,,51461.64082,57369.76493,14949.66667,17153.88027,19123.25498,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,NE3704/NE3706/NE3707,no,Total budget for the two trapping campaings in the three year period of project. Pag 230,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3705,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,19114,,,26711.01226,24779.27661,19114,26711.01226,24779.27661,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"FREDON, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3706,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Midi-Pyrénées,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,20000,,,27433.38051,25290.08709,20000,27433.38051,25290.08709,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,NE3704/NE3706/NE3707,no,"FREDON, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3707,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Midi-Pyrénées,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25000,,,34936.45007,32409.85222,25000,34936.45007,32409.85222,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,NE3704/NE3706/NE3707,no,"FREDON, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3708,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6819,,,10866.83223,9030.086227,6819,10866.83223,9030.086227,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"FREDON, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3709,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,6819,,,10162.07442,8968.461557,6819,10162.07442,8968.461557,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"FREDON, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3710,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,20554.44,,,28193.88868,25991.17889,20554.44,28193.88868,25991.17889,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"FREDON, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3711,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,5000,,,7968.054137,6621.268681,5000,7968.054137,6621.268681,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"DIREN, DREAL, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3712,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,5000,,,7451.293752,6576.082678,5000,7451.293752,6576.082678,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"DIREN, DREAL, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3713,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,5000,,,7584.172571,6475.906282,5000,7584.172571,6475.906282,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"DIREN, DREAL, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3714,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,5000,,,6858.345127,6322.521773,5000,6858.345127,6322.521773,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"DIREN, DREAL, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3715,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5000,,,6987.290014,6481.970443,5000,6987.290014,6481.970443,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"DIREN, DREAL, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3716,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Marais Audomarois,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,11991,,,16756.91891,15545.06152,11991,16756.91891,15545.06152,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Financing of traps and tail premiums for the year 2013. Pag. 225,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE3717,TC,FR27,"Diagnostic des espèces exotiques envahissantes animales et végétales du territoire du PNR des préAlpes d'Azur, et création d'outils de sensibilisation","POGGI, J.",NA,2013,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Europe,France,,Salses-Leucate,Unit (1ha),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,30830,1660,60000,43083.63022,39967.82975,30830,43083.63022,39967.82975,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Removal of the species, site Natura2000",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3718,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1875,,,2571.879423,2370.945665,1875,2571.879423,2370.945665,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3719,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,4522,,,7206.308162,5988.275395,4522,7206.308162,5988.275395,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/Unspecified,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,RNN du Mas Larrieu ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3720,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,4236,,,6312.736067,5571.257245,4236,6312.736067,5571.257245,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/Unspecified,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,RNN du Mas Larrieu ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3721,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,5321,,,8071.07645,6891.659465,5321,8071.07645,6891.659465,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/Unspecified,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,RNN du Mas Larrieu ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3722,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,5515,,,7564.754675,6973.741516,5515,7564.754675,6973.741516,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/Unspecified,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,RNN du Mas Larrieu ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3723,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5738,,,8018.614019,7438.709281,5738,8018.614019,7438.709281,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance/Unspecified,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,RNN du Mas Larrieu ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3724,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,37000,,,58963.60062,48997.38824,37000,58963.60062,48997.38824,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3725,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,4150,,,6184.573814,5458.148623,4150,6184.573814,5458.148623,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3726,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly-pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,17325,,,23764.16587,21907.53794,17325,23764.16587,21907.53794,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3727,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal Crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Vosges department,Unit (30 ha),40848,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,25761.84,,,39076.44806,33366.2523,25761.84,39076.44806,33366.2523,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs are related to the draining of a small pond and using the appropiate machinery. Pag 147,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3728,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Paspalum,Paspalum dilatatum,,Dallas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1250,,,1714.586282,1580.630443,1250,1714.586282,1580.630443,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3729,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Paspalum,Paspalum distichum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,9,Y,Europe,France,,Le Pland d'Eau du Mas,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,2400,,,3640.402834,3108.435015,2400,3640.402834,3108.435015,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Removal of the species (manual eradication, legislation/communication)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3730,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Periploca,Periploca graeca,,Grecian silkvine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2500,,,3429.172564,3161.260887,2500,3429.172564,3161.260887,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3733,TC,FR26,Manuel de gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes du bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Varray S., Haury J., Hudin, S. et al",NA,2018,French,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,Red Swamp Crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Brenne Regional Natural Park,Site,2013-2015,Period,2013,2015,2013,2015,One-time,245000,,,282435.1413,308704.9533,81666.66667,94145.04711,102901.6511,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Reported value is the total cost of the project for the whole time including: Employees, travelling, purchase of equipment, communications, events, meetings etc. Pag. 121 ",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3734,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,Red swamp crawfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Commune de Bellefontaine,Site,Autum 2009 - 2013,Period,2009,2013,2009,2013,One-time,5000,,,6987.290014,6481.970443,1000,1397.458003,1296.394089,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs are related to liming and purchase of material. Pag. 136 ,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3735,TC,FR9,Mise au point de dispositifs de pêche sélectifs pour les écrevisses de Louisiane sur le Lac de Grand Lieu,Association Des Pêcheurs Professionnels Maritimes Et Fluviaux Eau Douce De Loire Atlantique (A.A.D.P.P.M.F.E.D.L.A),NA,2017,French,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,Red Swamp Crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,France,,Grand Lieu/ Pays de la Loire,Unit (3350 ha),2014 - 2015,Period,2014,2015,2014,2015,One-time,64910,,,73327.60516,83692.852,32455,36663.80258,41846.426,EUR,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control/Education,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"The three actions during the project: Pêche, étude de la biologie des populations, sensibilitation. RNN and RNR",David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3737,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Auvergne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2500,,,3493.645007,3240.985222,2500,3493.645007,3240.985222,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE3738,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,625,,,857.2931409,790.3152216,625,857.2931409,790.3152216,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Centre Régional de la Propriété Forestière de PACA. Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3739,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,10800,,,17210.99694,14301.94035,10800,17210.99694,14301.94035,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONF,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3740,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,5528,,,8238.150372,7270.517009,5528,8238.150372,7270.517009,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,ONF,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3741,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Picardie,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,10800,,,17210.99694,14301.94035,10800,17210.99694,14301.94035,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONF,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3742,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Picardie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,5528,,,8238.150372,7270.517009,5528,8238.150372,7270.517009,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,ONF,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3743,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,False acacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Bourgogne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,5000,,,6858.345127,6322.521773,5000,6858.345127,6322.521773,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money spent on controlling fake acacia in a wildlife reserve of the French region Bourgogne,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3757,TC,FR11,Gestion de la Renouée du Japon à la confluence de la Luye et de la Durance,Syndicat mixte d’aménagement de la vallée de la Durance (SMAVD),NA,2017,French,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Durance river basin,Unit (river basin),2011 - 2017,Period,2011,2017,2011,2017,One-time,138000,,,155896.0024,177932.7311,19714.28571,22270.85748,25418.96159,EUR,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Travaux préparatoires, Terrassement et broyage des matériaux, Bâchage, ensemencement et plantation, Gestion et traitement des éventuels déchets découverts lors des travaux, suivi et reprise",David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3795,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Saururaceae,Saururus,Saururus cernuus,,dragon's tail,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,100,,,151.6834514,129.5181256,100,151.6834514,129.5181256,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,PNR Loire-Anjou-Touraine,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3796,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Saururaceae,Saururus,Saururus cernuus,,dragon's tail,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,102.5,,,140.5960751,129.6116963,102.5,140.5960751,129.6116963,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,PNR Loire-Anjou-Touraine,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3797,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Saururaceae,Saururus,Saururus cernuus,,dragon's tail,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,110,,,153.7203803,142.6033498,110,153.7203803,142.6033498,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PNR Loire-Anjou-Touraine,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3798,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Saururaceae,Saururus,Saururus cernuus,,dragon's tail,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,100,,,151.6834514,129.5181256,100,151.6834514,129.5181256,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PNR Loire-Anjou-Touraine,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3799,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Saururaceae,Saururus,Saururus cernuus,,dragon's tail,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,102.5,,,140.5960751,129.6116963,102.5,140.5960751,129.6116963,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PNR Loire-Anjou-Touraine,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3800,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Saururaceae,Saururus,Saururus cernuus,,dragon's tail,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,110,,,153.7203803,142.6033498,110,153.7203803,142.6033498,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PNR Loire-Anjou-Touraine,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3801,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio angulatus,,Climbing groundsel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1250,,,1714.586282,1580.630443,1250,1714.586282,1580.630443,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Destruction of the removed species,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3802,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sorghum,Sorghum halepense,,Allepo grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1250,,,1714.586282,1580.630443,1250,1714.586282,1580.630443,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3803,TC,FR24,Étude sur les coûts et l'efficacité de la gestion des espèces exotiques envahissantes sur le bassin Loire-Bretagne,"Brégea R., Varray S. & Piola F. ",NA,2018,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,Salt-water cordgrass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Loire-Bretagne,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,0.375,0.25,0.5,0.432298686,0.472507582,0.375,0.432298686,0.472507582,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per m2 of tarpuilins in a small area to be treated (1 -10m2). original name indocument was synonyms (Spartina alterniflora),Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3804,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,26146,,,36537.93694,33895.51984,26146,36537.93694,33895.51984,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PN-DDEE,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3805,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,4926,,,6756.841619,6228.948451,4926,6756.841619,6228.948451,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,PN-DDEE,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3806,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,4926,,,6883.878121,6386.037281,4926,6883.878121,6386.037281,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,PN-DDEE,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3807,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1592,,,2537.028437,2108.211948,1592,2537.028437,2108.211948,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PS-DENV,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3808,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1592,,,2372.491931,2093.824725,1592,2372.491931,2093.824725,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PS-DENV,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3809,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,28178,,,38650.8898,35631.2037,28178,38650.8898,35631.2037,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PS-DENV/CEN-PEE,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3810,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,29762,,,41591.14508,38583.28087,29762,41591.14508,38583.28087,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PS-DENV/CEN-PEE,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3811,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,13525,,,20515.18681,17517.32649,13525,20515.18681,17517.32649,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Dayu biik,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3812,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,10426,,,15814.51665,13503.55978,10426,15814.51665,13503.55978,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PN-DDEE/PS-DENV,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3813,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Tamias,Tamias sibiricus,,Siberian chipmunk,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,100000,,,159361.0827,132425.3736,100000,159361.0827,132425.3736,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3814,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Tamias,Tamias sibiricus,,Siberian chipmunk,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,100000,,,149025.875,131521.6536,100000,149025.875,131521.6536,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3815,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Tamias,Tamias sibiricus,,Siberian chipmunk,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,100000,,,151683.4514,129518.1256,100000,151683.4514,129518.1256,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3816,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Tamias,Tamias sibiricus,,Siberian chipmunk,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,100000,,,137166.9025,126450.4355,100000,137166.9025,126450.4355,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3817,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Tamias,Tamias sibiricus,,Siberian chipmunk,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,100000,,,139745.8003,129639.4089,100000,139745.8003,129639.4089,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3818,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,Sacred Ibis,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Saint-Jean-Cap-Ferrat Zoological Park,Site,2007 - 2008,Period,2007,2008,2007,2008,One-time,39,,,44.75025066,49.88786444,19.5,22.37512533,24.94393222,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per Ibis captured . In total 36 were captured. Pag. 194,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3819,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,Sacred Ibis,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Aude department,Site,2007-2009,Period,2007,2009,2007,2009,One-time,38,,,43.60280834,48.60868843,12.66666667,14.53426945,16.20289614,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per Ibis captured . In total 87 were captured. Pag. 194,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3820,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,Sacred Ibis,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Camargue,Site,2007 -2013,Period,2007,2013,2007,2013,One-time,711,,,815.8314928,909.494144,101.5714286,116.5473561,129.9277349,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per Ibis captured. In total 40 were captured. Pag. 194,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3821,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,Sacred Ibis,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Camargue,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1303,,,1495.117349,1666.766343,1303,1495.117349,1666.766343,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per Ibis captured during the last 8 months of interventions. Less than 10 were captured. Pag. 194,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3822,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Yellowbellied slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Auvergne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2500,,,3493.645007,3240.985222,2500,3493.645007,3240.985222,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3823,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Yellowbellied slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,400,,,637.444331,529.7014945,400,637.444331,529.7014945,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3824,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Yellowbellied slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,10000,,,15936.10827,13242.53736,10000,15936.10827,13242.53736,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3825,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Yellowbellied slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,17000,,,25334.39876,22358.68111,17000,25334.39876,22358.68111,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3826,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Yellowbellied slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,14000,,,21235.6832,18132.53759,14000,21235.6832,18132.53759,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3827,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Yellowbellied slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,400,,,548.6676102,505.8017418,400,548.6676102,505.8017418,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3828,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Yellowbellied slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Languedoc-Roussillon,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5400,,,7546.273215,7000.528079,5400,7546.273215,7000.528079,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3829,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,Trachemys scripta elegans,Red-eared slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Corsica Island,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,34500,,,54979.57355,45686.7539,34500,54979.57355,45686.7539,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pag. 174,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3830,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,Trachemys scripta elegans,Red-eared slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Corsica Island,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,25000,,,37256.46876,32880.41339,25000,37256.46876,32880.41339,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pag. 174,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3831,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,Trachemys scripta elegans,Red-eared slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Corsica Island,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,20000,,,30336.69029,25903.62513,20000,30336.69029,25903.62513,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pag. 174,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3832,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,Trachemys scripta elegans,Red-eared slider,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Étang de Mauguio,Site,2010 - 2013,Period,2010,2013,2010,2013,One-time,184,,,211.1293877,235.3683861,46,52.78234693,58.84209652,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost per individual captured (cummulative costs, equipment, travel cost and working time of the technician devoted to the project). Pag.177",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3936,TC,FR17,Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) : impacts écologiques et socio-économiques d’une espèce invasive en France,Godart,"Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrthorax) est une espèce invasive retrouvée pour la première fois en 2004 en Europe, plus particulièrement dans le sud-ouest de la France. Il a depuis colonisé presque les trois quarts de la France et quelques départements d’Espagne et du Portugal. Le problème est que cet insecte est un grand prédateur d’abeilles et de nombreux autres insectes. Beaucoup de témoignages d’apiculteurs retrouvant leurs ruches dévastées par les attaques du frelon asiatique ont créé un désarroi dans le milieu apicole, à tel point que beaucoup d’entre eux cessent leur activité. Le frelon asiatique est apparu dans un contexte apicole déjà fortement touché par l’affaiblissement des colonies. De plus, les attaques de cet insecte envers les pollinisateurs créent un risque non négligeable pour la biodiversité végétale. Il semblerait que cet insecte ne soit pas plus agressif que son cousin le frelon européen mais les piqures sont douloureuses et dangereuses pour les personnes allergiques. Les moyens de contrôle ne sont pas suffisants et les piégeages non sélectifs, pourtant non recommandés, sont majoritairement utilisés. Les modélisations écologiques ont montré que la plupart des pays d’Europe ont de forts risques d’être envahis. Les menaces écologiques et socio-économiques pour l’Europe sont bien réelles.",2014,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,France,Country,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,100000,,,159361.0827,132425.3736,100000,159361.0827,132425.3736,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,pg. 44. 2007-2009 : L’ADAAQ (Association de Développement de l’Apiculture en Aquitaine) financée par FranceAgriMer et la Région Aquitaine a réalisé une étude sur l’évaluation de l’incidence du frelon asiatique sur les ruches d’Aquitaine. Ce financement était d'environ 100 000 € par an.,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3937,TC,FR17,Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) : impacts écologiques et socio-économiques d’une espèce invasive en France,Godart,"Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrthorax) est une espèce invasive retrouvée pour la première fois en 2004 en Europe, plus particulièrement dans le sud-ouest de la France. Il a depuis colonisé presque les trois quarts de la France et quelques départements d’Espagne et du Portugal. Le problème est que cet insecte est un grand prédateur d’abeilles et de nombreux autres insectes. Beaucoup de témoignages d’apiculteurs retrouvant leurs ruches dévastées par les attaques du frelon asiatique ont créé un désarroi dans le milieu apicole, à tel point que beaucoup d’entre eux cessent leur activité. Le frelon asiatique est apparu dans un contexte apicole déjà fortement touché par l’affaiblissement des colonies. De plus, les attaques de cet insecte envers les pollinisateurs créent un risque non négligeable pour la biodiversité végétale. Il semblerait que cet insecte ne soit pas plus agressif que son cousin le frelon européen mais les piqures sont douloureuses et dangereuses pour les personnes allergiques. Les moyens de contrôle ne sont pas suffisants et les piégeages non sélectifs, pourtant non recommandés, sont majoritairement utilisés. Les modélisations écologiques ont montré que la plupart des pays d’Europe ont de forts risques d’être envahis. Les menaces écologiques et socio-économiques pour l’Europe sont bien réelles.",2014,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,France,Country,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,100000,,,159361.0827,132425.3736,100000,159361.0827,132425.3736,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,pg. 44. 2007-2009 : L’ADAAQ (Association de Développement de l’Apiculture en Aquitaine) financée par FranceAgriMer et la Région Aquitaine a réalisé une étude sur l’évaluation de l’incidence du frelon asiatique sur les ruches d’Aquitaine. Ce financement était d'environ 100 000 € par an.,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3938,TC,FR17,Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) : impacts écologiques et socio-économiques d’une espèce invasive en France,Godart,"Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrthorax) est une espèce invasive retrouvée pour la première fois en 2004 en Europe, plus particulièrement dans le sud-ouest de la France. Il a depuis colonisé presque les trois quarts de la France et quelques départements d’Espagne et du Portugal. Le problème est que cet insecte est un grand prédateur d’abeilles et de nombreux autres insectes. Beaucoup de témoignages d’apiculteurs retrouvant leurs ruches dévastées par les attaques du frelon asiatique ont créé un désarroi dans le milieu apicole, à tel point que beaucoup d’entre eux cessent leur activité. Le frelon asiatique est apparu dans un contexte apicole déjà fortement touché par l’affaiblissement des colonies. De plus, les attaques de cet insecte envers les pollinisateurs créent un risque non négligeable pour la biodiversité végétale. Il semblerait que cet insecte ne soit pas plus agressif que son cousin le frelon européen mais les piqures sont douloureuses et dangereuses pour les personnes allergiques. Les moyens de contrôle ne sont pas suffisants et les piégeages non sélectifs, pourtant non recommandés, sont majoritairement utilisés. Les modélisations écologiques ont montré que la plupart des pays d’Europe ont de forts risques d’être envahis. Les menaces écologiques et socio-économiques pour l’Europe sont bien réelles.",2014,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,France,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,100000,,,159361.0827,132425.3736,100000,159361.0827,132425.3736,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,pg. 44. 2007-2009 : L’ADAAQ (Association de Développement de l’Apiculture en Aquitaine) financée par FranceAgriMer et la Région Aquitaine a réalisé une étude sur l’évaluation de l’incidence du frelon asiatique sur les ruches d’Aquitaine. Ce financement était d'environ 100 000 € par an.,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3939,TC,FR17,Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) : impacts écologiques et socio-économiques d’une espèce invasive en France,Godart,"Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrthorax) est une espèce invasive retrouvée pour la première fois en 2004 en Europe, plus particulièrement dans le sud-ouest de la France. Il a depuis colonisé presque les trois quarts de la France et quelques départements d’Espagne et du Portugal. Le problème est que cet insecte est un grand prédateur d’abeilles et de nombreux autres insectes. Beaucoup de témoignages d’apiculteurs retrouvant leurs ruches dévastées par les attaques du frelon asiatique ont créé un désarroi dans le milieu apicole, à tel point que beaucoup d’entre eux cessent leur activité. Le frelon asiatique est apparu dans un contexte apicole déjà fortement touché par l’affaiblissement des colonies. De plus, les attaques de cet insecte envers les pollinisateurs créent un risque non négligeable pour la biodiversité végétale. Il semblerait que cet insecte ne soit pas plus agressif que son cousin le frelon européen mais les piqures sont douloureuses et dangereuses pour les personnes allergiques. Les moyens de contrôle ne sont pas suffisants et les piégeages non sélectifs, pourtant non recommandés, sont majoritairement utilisés. Les modélisations écologiques ont montré que la plupart des pays d’Europe ont de forts risques d’être envahis. Les menaces écologiques et socio-économiques pour l’Europe sont bien réelles.",2014,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,France,Country,2008-2011,Period,2008,2011,2008,2011,One-time,400000,,,606733.8057,518072.5025,100000,151683.4514,129518.1256,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"pg. 44. 2008-2011 : Le MNHN financé par FranceAgriMer a étudié la biologie, le comportement et l’impact de Vespa velutina sur les abeilles en vue d’un contrôle spécifique. Environ 400 000 € sur 4 ans ont été attribués au MNHN, à l’IRD, au CNRS de Gif-sur-Yvette et à l’INRA de Bordeaux, montant réparti de la façon suivante : 350 000 € pour engager des CDD (contrat à durée déterminée) et des vacataires et 50 000 € sur 4 ans pour le matériel, les expériences et les missions des quatre équipes de recherche.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3940,TC,FR17,Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) : impacts écologiques et socio-économiques d’une espèce invasive en France,Godart,"Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrthorax) est une espèce invasive retrouvée pour la première fois en 2004 en Europe, plus particulièrement dans le sud-ouest de la France. Il a depuis colonisé presque les trois quarts de la France et quelques départements d’Espagne et du Portugal. Le problème est que cet insecte est un grand prédateur d’abeilles et de nombreux autres insectes. Beaucoup de témoignages d’apiculteurs retrouvant leurs ruches dévastées par les attaques du frelon asiatique ont créé un désarroi dans le milieu apicole, à tel point que beaucoup d’entre eux cessent leur activité. Le frelon asiatique est apparu dans un contexte apicole déjà fortement touché par l’affaiblissement des colonies. De plus, les attaques de cet insecte envers les pollinisateurs créent un risque non négligeable pour la biodiversité végétale. Il semblerait que cet insecte ne soit pas plus agressif que son cousin le frelon européen mais les piqures sont douloureuses et dangereuses pour les personnes allergiques. Les moyens de contrôle ne sont pas suffisants et les piégeages non sélectifs, pourtant non recommandés, sont majoritairement utilisés. Les modélisations écologiques ont montré que la plupart des pays d’Europe ont de forts risques d’être envahis. Les menaces écologiques et socio-économiques pour l’Europe sont bien réelles.",2014,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,France,Country,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,25000,,,37256.46876,32880.41339,25000,37256.46876,32880.41339,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 44 2010 : Projet FRB WASPREY porté par le MNHN, ayant pour but de déterminer le régime alimentaire de Vespa velutina et d’estimer son impact sur la biodiversité. Environ 25 000 € ont été répartis entre l’IRD de Gif-sur-Yvette, l’IRCGN et le MNHN pour étudier la génétique du frelon asiatique.",Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3941,TC,FR17,Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) : impacts écologiques et socio-économiques d’une espèce invasive en France,Godart,"Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrthorax) est une espèce invasive retrouvée pour la première fois en 2004 en Europe, plus particulièrement dans le sud-ouest de la France. Il a depuis colonisé presque les trois quarts de la France et quelques départements d’Espagne et du Portugal. Le problème est que cet insecte est un grand prédateur d’abeilles et de nombreux autres insectes. Beaucoup de témoignages d’apiculteurs retrouvant leurs ruches dévastées par les attaques du frelon asiatique ont créé un désarroi dans le milieu apicole, à tel point que beaucoup d’entre eux cessent leur activité. Le frelon asiatique est apparu dans un contexte apicole déjà fortement touché par l’affaiblissement des colonies. De plus, les attaques de cet insecte envers les pollinisateurs créent un risque non négligeable pour la biodiversité végétale. Il semblerait que cet insecte ne soit pas plus agressif que son cousin le frelon européen mais les piqures sont douloureuses et dangereuses pour les personnes allergiques. Les moyens de contrôle ne sont pas suffisants et les piégeages non sélectifs, pourtant non recommandés, sont majoritairement utilisés. Les modélisations écologiques ont montré que la plupart des pays d’Europe ont de forts risques d’être envahis. Les menaces écologiques et socio-économiques pour l’Europe sont bien réelles.",2014,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,France,Country,2011-2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,200000,,,279491.6005,259278.8177,66666.66667,93163.86685,86426.27258,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Pg 44. 2011-2013 : Projet financé par la région Centre porté par l’IRBI de Tours qui a pour but la recherche d’un appât et la modélisation de la dispersion du frelon. Une somme de 200 000 € a été répartie entre l’IRBI et l’URZF (dont 100 000 € pour un CDD à l’IRBI).,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3942,TC,FR17,Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) : impacts écologiques et socio-économiques d’une espèce invasive en France,Godart,"Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrthorax) est une espèce invasive retrouvée pour la première fois en 2004 en Europe, plus particulièrement dans le sud-ouest de la France. Il a depuis colonisé presque les trois quarts de la France et quelques départements d’Espagne et du Portugal. Le problème est que cet insecte est un grand prédateur d’abeilles et de nombreux autres insectes. Beaucoup de témoignages d’apiculteurs retrouvant leurs ruches dévastées par les attaques du frelon asiatique ont créé un désarroi dans le milieu apicole, à tel point que beaucoup d’entre eux cessent leur activité. Le frelon asiatique est apparu dans un contexte apicole déjà fortement touché par l’affaiblissement des colonies. De plus, les attaques de cet insecte envers les pollinisateurs créent un risque non négligeable pour la biodiversité végétale. Il semblerait que cet insecte ne soit pas plus agressif que son cousin le frelon européen mais les piqures sont douloureuses et dangereuses pour les personnes allergiques. Les moyens de contrôle ne sont pas suffisants et les piégeages non sélectifs, pourtant non recommandés, sont majoritairement utilisés. Les modélisations écologiques ont montré que la plupart des pays d’Europe ont de forts risques d’être envahis. Les menaces écologiques et socio-économiques pour l’Europe sont bien réelles.",2014,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,France,Country,2013-2014,Period,2013,2014,2013,2014,One-time,20000,,,27510.92605,25642.82722,10000,13755.46302,12821.41361,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Pg 45. 2013-2014 : Convention NAAS-RDA (laboratoire de recherche apicole de Corée du Sud où Vespa velutina est aussi invasif) avec le MNHN. Environ 20 000 € ont permis l’échange de connaissances. Le MNHN espère une vraie collaboration pour la mise au point de méthodes de lutte pour la fin 2014 et après.,Elena Angulo/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3943,TC,FR17,Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrithorax) : impacts écologiques et socio-économiques d’une espèce invasive en France,Godart,"Le frelon asiatique (Vespa velutina nigrthorax) est une espèce invasive retrouvée pour la première fois en 2004 en Europe, plus particulièrement dans le sud-ouest de la France. Il a depuis colonisé presque les trois quarts de la France et quelques départements d’Espagne et du Portugal. Le problème est que cet insecte est un grand prédateur d’abeilles et de nombreux autres insectes. Beaucoup de témoignages d’apiculteurs retrouvant leurs ruches dévastées par les attaques du frelon asiatique ont créé un désarroi dans le milieu apicole, à tel point que beaucoup d’entre eux cessent leur activité. Le frelon asiatique est apparu dans un contexte apicole déjà fortement touché par l’affaiblissement des colonies. De plus, les attaques de cet insecte envers les pollinisateurs créent un risque non négligeable pour la biodiversité végétale. Il semblerait que cet insecte ne soit pas plus agressif que son cousin le frelon européen mais les piqures sont douloureuses et dangereuses pour les personnes allergiques. Les moyens de contrôle ne sont pas suffisants et les piégeages non sélectifs, pourtant non recommandés, sont majoritairement utilisés. Les modélisations écologiques ont montré que la plupart des pays d’Europe ont de forts risques d’être envahis. Les menaces écologiques et socio-économiques pour l’Europe sont bien réelles.",2014,French,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Yellow-legged hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,France,Country,2013-2015,Period,2013,2015,2013,2015,One-time,20000,,,22948.84649,25583.52022,6666.666667,7649.615497,8527.840075,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Pg. 45. 2013-2015 : Projet FranceAgriMer RISQAPI porté par l’INRA d’Avignon. Le but est d’évaluer l’impact de différents éléments sur l’affaiblissement des colonies d’abeilles. C’est un gros projet de 8 organismes, dont 20 000 € sont alloués au MNHN pour l’étude de la composante frelon asiatique dans l’affaiblissement des colonies d’abeilles. C’est le premier projet qui ne se contente pas d’une enquête et qui aura ainsi des résultats scientifiques sur l’impact réel du frelon et non pas du ressenti d’apiculteurs",Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
NE3944,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Limousin,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1000,,,1371.669025,1264.504355,1000,1371.669025,1264.504355,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,CG Corrèze,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3945,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,67100,,,99996.36215,88251.02954,67100,99996.36215,88251.02954,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3946,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,83600,,,126807.3654,108277.153,83600,126807.3654,108277.153,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3947,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,83600,,,114671.5305,105712.564,83600,114671.5305,105712.564,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3948,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,51625,,,72143.76939,66926.34483,51625,72143.76939,66926.34483,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3949,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,101773,,,162186.5547,134773.2755,101773,162186.5547,134773.2755,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3950,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,181809,,,270942.4532,239118.2031,181809,270942.4532,239118.2031,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN/Etat - agriculture,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3951,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,181808.56,,,275773.4988,235475.0392,181808.56,275773.4988,235475.0392,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN/Etat - agriculture,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3952,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,9031.67,,,12388.46199,11420.58604,9031.67,12388.46199,11420.58604,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,MNHN/Etat-ecologie et agriculture,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3953,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Pipidae,Xenopus,Xenopus laevis,,African clowed frog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Argentonnais,Site,June 2011 - June 2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,49250,,,56511.53449,62999.41855,16416.66667,18837.17816,20999.80618,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,Position for managing the work for the 3 years. Pag 168,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3954,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Pipidae,Xenopus,Xenopus laevis,,African clowed frog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Argentonnais,Site,June 2011 - June 2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,8300,,,9523.771294,10617.16089,2766.666667,3174.590431,3539.053631,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,Costs related to the position. Pag. 168,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3955,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Pipidae,Xenopus,Xenopus laevis,,African clowed frog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Argentonnais,Site,June 2011 - June 2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,4000,,,4589.769298,5116.704045,1333.333333,1529.923099,1705.568015,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs related to tramps material. Pag. 168,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3956,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Pipidae,Xenopus,Xenopus laevis,,African clowed frog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Argentonnais,Site,June 2011 - June 2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,2000,,,2294.884649,2558.352022,666.6666667,764.9615497,852.7840075,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Pag. 168,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3957,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Pipidae,Xenopus,Xenopus laevis,,African clowed frog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Argentonnais,Site,June 2011 - June 2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,360,,,413.0792369,460.503364,120,137.693079,153.5011213,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Management (Unspecified),Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,Cost refers to storage material. Pag. 168,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3958,TC,FR28,"Les espèces exotiques envahissantes dans les milieux aquatiques, Connaissances pratiques et expériences de gestion, vol2","Sarat E., Mazaubert E., Dutartre A., Poulet N., Soubeyran Y.",NA,2015,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Pipidae,Xenopus,Xenopus laevis,,African clowed frog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,France,,Argentonnais,Site,June 2011 - June 2013,Period,2011,2013,2011,2013,One-time,390,,,447.5025066,498.8786444,130,149.1675022,166.2928815,EUR,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,Cost refers to cartography. Pag. 168,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/David Renault,Yes
NE3959,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Solidago,Solidago gigantea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Bourgogne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,10000,,,13716.69025,12645.04355,10000,13716.69025,12645.04355,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"DREAL Bourgogne, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3960,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Bourgogne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,20000,,,27433.38051,25290.08709,20000,27433.38051,25290.08709,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Damage repair/Management/Monitoring/Prevention/Research/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DREAL Bourgogne, details of the funders available in the source excel file, development of the database ASTABASE",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3961,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,10000,,,15168.34514,12951.81256,10000,15168.34514,12951.81256,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CEN Basse Normandie,  Fédération de Pêche de la Manche, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3962,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,12500,,,17145.86282,15806.30443,12500,17145.86282,15806.30443,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CEN Basse Normandie,  Fédération de Pêche de la Manche, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3963,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,10000,,,13974.58003,12963.94089,10000,13974.58003,12963.94089,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CEN Basse Normandie,  Fédération de Pêche de la Manche, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3964,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1800,,,2868.499489,2383.656725,1800,2868.499489,2383.656725,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"LPO, RNN du Marais d'Yves, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3965,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,600,,,910.1007086,777.1087538,600,910.1007086,777.1087538,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"LPO, RNN du Marais d'Yves, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3966,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1800,,,2515.424405,2333.50936,1800,2515.424405,2333.50936,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO, RNN du Marais d'Yves, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3967,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,100000,,,159361.0827,132425.3736,100000,159361.0827,132425.3736,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Parc naturel régional de la Brenne, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Actions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3968,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,100000,,,149025.875,131521.6536,100000,149025.875,131521.6536,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Parc naturel régional de la Brenne, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Actions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3969,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,150000,,,227525.1771,194277.1885,150000,227525.1771,194277.1885,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Parc naturel régional de la Brenne, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Actions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3970,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,150000,,,205750.3538,189675.6532,150000,205750.3538,189675.6532,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Parc naturel régional de la Brenne, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Actions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3971,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Centre,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,150000,,,209618.7004,194459.1133,150000,209618.7004,194459.1133,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Parc naturel régional de la Brenne, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Actions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3972,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bourgogne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,10000,,,13974.58003,12963.94089,10000,13974.58003,12963.94089,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Damage repair/Monitoring/Prevention/Research/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DREAL Bourgogne, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3973,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,150,,,239.0416241,198.6380604,150,239.0416241,198.6380604,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"RNN de Saint Quentin en Yvelines et RN Géologique de l’Essonne, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3974,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,150,,,223.5388126,197.2824803,150,223.5388126,197.2824803,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"RNN de Saint Quentin en Yvelines et RN Géologique de l’Essonne, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3975,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,150,,,227.5251771,194.2771885,150,227.5251771,194.2771885,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"RNN de Saint Quentin en Yvelines et RN Géologique de l’Essonne, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3976,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,150,,,205.7503538,189.6756532,150,205.7503538,189.6756532,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"RNN de Saint Quentin en Yvelines et RN Géologique de l’Essonne, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3977,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada Goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Ile-de-France,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,150,,,209.6187004,194.4591133,150,209.6187004,194.4591133,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"RNN de Saint Quentin en Yvelines et RN Géologique de l’Essonne, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE3978,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,25590,,,40780.50107,33887.65311,25590,40780.50107,33887.65311,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CdC Pays d'Honfleur, Syndicat Mixte Bassin Versant Touques, Syndicat Mixte Calvados Littoral Espaces Naturels, Syndicat Intercommunal d'Aménagement et d'Entretien de la Sienne, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3979,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,30220,,,45035.61944,39745.84371,30220,45035.61944,39745.84371,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CdC Pays d'Honfleur, Syndicat Mixte Bassin Versant Touques, Syndicat Mixte Calvados Littoral Espaces Naturels, Syndicat Intercommunal d'Aménagement et d'Entretien de la Sienne, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3980,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,35450,,,53771.78353,45914.17554,35450,53771.78353,45914.17554,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CdC Pays d'Honfleur, Syndicat Mixte Bassin Versant Touques, Syndicat Mixte Calvados Littoral Espaces Naturels, Syndicat Intercommunal d'Aménagement et d'Entretien de la Sienne, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3981,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,31040,,,42576.60655,39250.21517,31040,42576.60655,39250.21517,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CdC Pays d'Honfleur, Syndicat Mixte Bassin Versant Touques, Syndicat Mixte Calvados Littoral Espaces Naturels, Syndicat Intercommunal d'Aménagement et d'Entretien de la Sienne, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3982,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,37900,,,52963.6583,49133.33596,37900,52963.6583,49133.33596,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CdC Pays d'Honfleur, Syndicat Mixte Bassin Versant Touques, Syndicat Mixte Calvados Littoral Espaces Naturels, Syndicat Intercommunal d'Aménagement et d'Entretien de la Sienne, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3983,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,25000,,,37920.86286,32379.53141,25000,37920.86286,32379.53141,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DREAL PACA, CG06,  details of the funders available in the source excel file, Actions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3984,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,25000,,,34291.72564,31612.60887,25000,34291.72564,31612.60887,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DREAL PACA, CG06,  details of the funders available in the source excel file, Actions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3985,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,38000,,,53103.4041,49262.97537,38000,53103.4041,49262.97537,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DREAL PACA, CG06,  details of the funders available in the source excel file, Actions 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3986,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1250,,,1714.586282,1580.630443,1250,1714.586282,1580.630443,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"DREAL PACA, Station Alpine Joseph Fourier - Jardin Alpin du Lautaret,  details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3987,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,43200,,,64379.17802,56817.35434,43200,64379.17802,56817.35434,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Fédération de Pêche du Calavdos, PNR Normandie-Maine, CPIE Collines Normandes",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3988,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,48200,,,73111.42359,62427.73656,48200,73111.42359,62427.73656,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Fédération de Pêche du Calavdos, PNR Normandie-Maine, CPIE Collines Normandes",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3989,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,40000,,,54866.76102,50580.17418,40000,54866.76102,50580.17418,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Fédération de Pêche du Calavdos, PNR Normandie-Maine, CPIE Collines Normandes",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3990,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1800,,,2868.499489,2383.656725,1800,2868.499489,2383.656725,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3991,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,600,,,910.1007086,777.1087538,600,910.1007086,777.1087538,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3992,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1800,,,2515.424405,2333.50936,1800,2515.424405,2333.50936,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3993,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,15803,,,25183.83191,20927.18179,15803,25183.83191,20927.18179,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Parc Naturel des Cévennes et sarl saules et eaux,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3994,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,10674,,,14916.46672,13837.7105,10674,14916.46672,13837.7105,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Parc Naturel des Cévennes et sarl saules et eaux,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3995,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Rhône-Alpes,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,15803,,,25183.83191,20927.18179,15803,25183.83191,20927.18179,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Parc Naturel des Cévennes et sarl saules et eaux,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3996,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Rhône-Alpes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,10674,,,14916.46672,13837.7105,10674,14916.46672,13837.7105,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Parc Naturel des Cévennes et sarl saules et eaux,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3997,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Elaeagnaceae,Elaegnus,Elaeagnus angustifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,180,,,286.8499489,238.3656725,180,286.8499489,238.3656725,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3998,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Elaeagnaceae,Elaegnus,Elaeagnus angustifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,360,,,493.8008492,455.2215677,360,493.8008492,455.2215677,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE3999,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Elaeagnaceae,Elaegnus,Elaeagnus angustifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,90,,,125.7712202,116.675468,90,125.7712202,116.675468,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4000,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca filamentosa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,70,,,96.01683178,88.51530482,70,96.01683178,88.51530482,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4001,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Yucca,Yucca filamentosa,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,540,,,754.6273215,700.0528079,540,754.6273215,700.0528079,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4002,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,90,,,125.7712202,116.675468,90,125.7712202,116.675468,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4003,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus anglicus,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4500,,,6825.755314,5828.315654,4500,6825.755314,5828.315654,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Baie de l'Aiguillon,  details of the funders available in the source excel file. Original name in document was a synonym: Spartina anglica",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4004,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus anglicus,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4500,,,6825.755314,5828.315654,4500,6825.755314,5828.315654,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Baie de l'Aiguillon,  details of the funders available in the source excel file. Original name in document was a synonym: Spartina anglica",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4005,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,180,,,286.8499489,238.3656725,180,286.8499489,238.3656725,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4006,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,5400,,,8190.906377,6993.978784,5400,8190.906377,6993.978784,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4007,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2700,,,3703.506369,3414.161757,2700,3703.506369,3414.161757,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4008,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5400,,,7546.273215,7000.528079,5400,7546.273215,7000.528079,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4009,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7500,,,10287.51769,9483.78266,7500,10287.51769,9483.78266,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBNA et CBNMed, Conservatoire du littoral, Actions 1, 2, 4 and 5 have been conducted",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4010,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,416.67,,,571.5333328,526.8810294,416.67,571.5333328,526.8810294,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBNA et CBNMed, Conservatoire du littoral. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4011,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,40000,,,63744.4331,52970.14945,40000,63744.4331,52970.14945,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, DREAL Bordeaux Aquitaine, RNN du Courant d'Huchet, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4012,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,40000,,,59610.35002,52608.66143,40000,59610.35002,52608.66143,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, DREAL Bordeaux Aquitaine, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4013,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,40000,,,60673.38057,51807.25025,40000,60673.38057,51807.25025,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, DREAL Bordeaux Aquitaine, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4014,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,40000,,,54866.76102,50580.17418,40000,54866.76102,50580.17418,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, DREAL Bordeaux Aquitaine, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4015,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,40000,,,55898.32011,51855.76355,40000,55898.32011,51855.76355,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, DREAL Bordeaux Aquitaine, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4016,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,5000,,,7968.054137,6621.268681,5000,7968.054137,6621.268681,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4017,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,5000,,,7451.293752,6576.082678,5000,7451.293752,6576.082678,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4018,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,25000,,,37920.86286,32379.53141,25000,37920.86286,32379.53141,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4019,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,25000,,,34291.72564,31612.60887,25000,34291.72564,31612.60887,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4020,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Baccharis,Baccharis halimifolia,,Eastern baccharis,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25000,,,34936.45007,32409.85222,25000,34936.45007,32409.85222,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4021,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,2800,,,4462.110317,3707.910461,2800,4462.110317,3707.910461,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, Syndicat pour le Développement du Saint-Lois, communes, privé, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4022,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1400,,,2086.362251,1841.30315,1400,2086.362251,1841.30315,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, Syndicat pour le Développement du Saint-Lois, communes, privé, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4023,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1400,,,2123.56832,1813.253759,1400,2123.56832,1813.253759,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, Syndicat pour le Développement du Saint-Lois, communes, privé, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4024,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1750,,,2400.420795,2212.882621,1750,2400.420795,2212.882621,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, Syndicat pour le Développement du Saint-Lois, communes, privé, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4025,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,6300,,,8803.985417,8167.282759,6300,8803.985417,8167.282759,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CEN-BN, Syndicat pour le Développement du Saint-Lois, communes, privé, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4026,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,15000,,,23904.16241,19863.80604,15000,23904.16241,19863.80604,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Conservatoire du Littoral, SYMEL, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4027,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,15000,,,22353.88126,19728.24803,15000,22353.88126,19728.24803,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Conservatoire du Littoral, SYMEL, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4028,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,15000,,,22752.51771,19427.71885,15000,22752.51771,19427.71885,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Conservatoire du Littoral, SYMEL, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4029,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Basse-Normandie,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15000,,,20575.03538,18967.56532,15000,20575.03538,18967.56532,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Conservatoire du Littoral, SYMEL, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4030,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Orconectes,Orconectes limosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1800,,,2868.499489,2383.656725,1800,2868.499489,2383.656725,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4031,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Orconectes,Orconectes limosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,600,,,910.1007086,777.1087538,600,910.1007086,777.1087538,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4032,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Orconectes,Orconectes limosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Poitou-Charentes,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1800,,,2515.424405,2333.50936,1800,2515.424405,2333.50936,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"LPO RNN Marais d'Yves,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4038,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1875,,,2571.879423,2370.945665,1875,2571.879423,2370.945665,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBNA et CBNMed,  details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4039,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,7500,,,11376.25886,9713.859423,7500,11376.25886,9713.859423,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONF,  details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4040,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1000,,,1593.610827,1324.253736,1000,1593.610827,1324.253736,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/,Yes
NE4041,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Country,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,500,,,745.1293752,657.6082678,500,745.1293752,657.6082678,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4042,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Country,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1000,,,1516.834514,1295.181256,1000,1516.834514,1295.181256,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4043,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Country,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1000,,,1371.669025,1264.504355,1000,1371.669025,1264.504355,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4044,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,Metropolitan France,Country,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2000,,,2794.916005,2592.788177,2000,2794.916005,2592.788177,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species,David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4045,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Serpulidae,Ficopomatus,Ficopomatus enigmaticus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,176,,,280.4755056,233.0686576,176,280.4755056,233.0686576,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4046,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Serpulidae,Ficopomatus,Ficopomatus enigmaticus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,177,,,263.7757988,232.7933268,177,263.7757988,232.7933268,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4047,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Serpulidae,Ficopomatus,Ficopomatus enigmaticus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,180,,,273.0302126,233.1326261,180,273.0302126,233.1326261,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4048,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Serpulidae,Ficopomatus,Ficopomatus enigmaticus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,184,,,252.3871007,232.6688012,184,252.3871007,232.6688012,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4049,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Annelida,Polychaeta,Sabellida,Serpulidae,Ficopomatus,Ficopomatus enigmaticus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,189,,,264.1195625,245.0184828,189,264.1195625,245.0184828,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CdC Noirmoutier, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4050,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia ficus-indica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,7500,,,11376.25886,9713.859423,7500,11376.25886,9713.859423,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONF, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4051,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Nord-Pas-de-Calais,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,7500,,,10480.93502,9722.955665,7500,10480.93502,9722.955665,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CPIE Val d'Authie, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4052,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Balsaminaceae,Impatiens,Impatiens glandulifera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Nord-Pas-de-Calais,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,7500,,,10480.93502,9722.955665,7500,10480.93502,9722.955665,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"CPIE Val d'Authie, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4053,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Caulerpaceae,Caulerpa,Caulerpa taxifolia,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,47558,,,72137.61583,61596.23019,47558,72137.61583,61596.23019,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PNPC (Port Cros) , details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4054,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Caulerpaceae,Caulerpa,Caulerpa taxifolia,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,47558,,,65233.83551,60137.2981,47558,65233.83551,60137.2981,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PNPC (Port Cros) , details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4055,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Caulerpaceae,Caulerpa,Caulerpa taxifolia,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,PACA,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,47558,,,66460.30769,61653.91007,47558,66460.30769,61653.91007,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PNPC (Port Cros) , details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4060,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6160,,,9816.642697,8157.403015,6160,9816.642697,8157.403015,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Communication/Damage repair/Education/Eradication/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBN, Conseil général de l'Hérault, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Original name in document was a synonym (Opuntia rosea)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4061,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,800,,,1192.207,1052.173229,800,1192.207,1052.173229,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Communication/Damage repair/Education/Eradication/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBN, Conseil général de l'Hérault, details of the funders available in the source excel file Original name in document was a synonym (Opuntia rosea)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4062,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,560,,,849.427328,725.3015036,560,849.427328,725.3015036,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Communication/Damage repair/Education/Eradication/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBN, Conseil général de l'Hérault, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Original name in document was a synonym (Opuntia rosea)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4063,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,480,,,658.4011322,606.9620902,480,658.4011322,606.9620902,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Communication/Damage repair/Education/Eradication/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBN, Conseil général de l'Hérault, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Original name in document was a synonym (Opuntia rosea)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4064,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia rosea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Occitanie (Languedoc-Roussillon),Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1520,,,2124.136164,1970.519015,1520,2124.136164,1970.519015,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Communication/Damage repair/Education/Eradication/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"CBN, Conseil général de l'Hérault, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Original name in document was a synonym (Opuntia rosea)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4065,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6990,,,11139.33968,9256.533616,6990,11139.33968,9256.533616,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4066,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,7215,,,10752.21688,9489.287305,7215,10752.21688,9489.287305,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4067,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,7677,,,11644.73857,9943.106505,7677,11644.73857,9943.106505,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4068,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7742,,,10619.46159,9789.792713,7742,10619.46159,9789.792713,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4069,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,8261,,,11544.40056,10709.51157,8261,11544.40056,10709.51157,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4070,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6990,,,11139.33968,9256.533616,6990,11139.33968,9256.533616,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4071,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,7215,,,10752.21688,9489.287305,7215,10752.21688,9489.287305,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4072,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,7677,,,11644.73857,9943.106505,7677,11644.73857,9943.106505,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4073,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7742,,,10619.46159,9789.792713,7742,10619.46159,9789.792713,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4074,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Pelecaniformes,Threskiornithidae,Threskiornis,Threskiornis aethiopicus,,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,8261,,,11544.40056,10709.51157,8261,11544.40056,10709.51157,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4075,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,14378,,,22912.93648,19040.12022,14378,22912.93648,19040.12022,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4076,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,9969,,,14856.38948,13111.39364,9969,14856.38948,13111.39364,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4077,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,8469,,,12846.0715,10968.89006,8469,12846.0715,10968.89006,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4078,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,12011,,,16475.11666,15187.9618,12011,16475.11666,15187.9618,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4079,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Bretagne,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,14843,,,20742.46913,19242.37746,14843,20742.46913,19242.37746,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4080,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,14378,,,22912.93648,19040.12022,14378,22912.93648,19040.12022,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4081,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,9969,,,14856.38948,13111.39364,9969,14856.38948,13111.39364,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4082,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,8469,,,12846.0715,10968.89006,8469,12846.0715,10968.89006,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4083,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,12011,,,16475.11666,15187.9618,12011,16475.11666,15187.9618,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4084,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,Ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,,Pays de la Loire,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,14843,,,20742.46913,19242.37746,14843,20742.46913,19242.37746,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Education/Eradication/Management/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"ONCFS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4085,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Siluriformes,Ictaluridae,Ameiurus,Ameiurus nebulosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,320,,,509.9554648,423.7611956,320,509.9554648,423.7611956,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"SEPANLANDES, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4086,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Siluriformes,Ictaluridae,Ameiurus,Ameiurus nebulosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,50,,,74.51293752,65.76082678,50,74.51293752,65.76082678,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"SEPANLANDES, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4087,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Siluriformes,Ictaluridae,Ameiurus,Ameiurus nebulosus,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,France,,Aquitaine,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,600,,,910.1007086,777.1087538,600,910.1007086,777.1087538,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"SEPANLANDES, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4128,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,74200,,,110577.1993,97589.06695,74200,110577.1993,97589.06695,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4129,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,26844,,,40717.9057,34767.84565,26844,40717.9057,34767.84565,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4130,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,57724,,,79178.22282,72992.24937,57724,79178.22282,72992.24937,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4131,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,54000,,,75462.73215,70005.28079,54000,75462.73215,70005.28079,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4136,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Lacertidae,Lacerta,Lacerta bilineata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,28728,,,40146.1735,37242.80938,28728,40146.1735,37242.80938,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4138,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus alceifolius,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,92937,,,138500.1775,122232.2792,92937,138500.1775,122232.2792,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4139,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus alceifolius,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,78819,,,119555.3796,102084.8914,78819,119555.3796,102084.8914,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4140,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus alceifolius,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,95589,,,131116.4705,120872.7068,95589,131116.4705,120872.7068,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4141,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus alceifolius,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,89192,,,124642.0742,115627.9816,89192,124642.0742,115627.9816,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4142,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,11539,,,15827.68888,14591.11575,11539,15827.68888,14591.11575,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4143,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Africa,France,,La Réunion (Outre Mer),Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,25036,,,34986.75856,32456.5224,25036,34986.75856,32456.5224,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL La Réunion, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4174,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Diverse/Unspecified,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Antarctic-Subantarctic,France,,TAAF,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,136099,,,216888.84,180229.6092,136099,216888.84,180229.6092,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"IPEV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4175,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Diverse/Unspecified,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Antarctic-Subantarctic,France,,TAAF,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,106849,,,159232.6572,140529.5716,106849,159232.6572,140529.5716,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"IPEV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4176,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Diverse/Unspecified,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Antarctic-Subantarctic,France,,TAAF,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,103639,,,157203.2122,134231.2902,103639,157203.2122,134231.2902,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"IPEV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4177,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Diverse/Unspecified,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Antarctic-Subantarctic,France,,TAAF,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,108282,,,148527.0654,136923.0605,108282,148527.0654,136923.0605,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"IPEV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4178,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Diverse/Unspecified,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Antarctic-Subantarctic,France,,TAAF,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,122183,,,170745.6111,158397.3189,122183,170745.6111,158397.3189,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"IPEV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4179,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rangifer,Rangifer tarandus,,Reindeer/Caribou,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Antarctic-Subantarctic,France,,TAAF,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,18997,,,28815.30527,24604.55833,18997,28815.30527,24604.55833,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"IPEV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4180,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rangifer,Rangifer tarandus,,Reindeer/Caribou,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Antarctic-Subantarctic,France,,TAAF,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,24644,,,33803.41146,31162.44531,24644,33803.41146,31162.44531,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"IPEV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4181,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rangifer,Rangifer tarandus,,Reindeer/Caribou,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Antarctic-Subantarctic,France,,TAAF,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,33701,,,47095.73215,43689.77718,33701,47095.73215,43689.77718,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"IPEV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4202,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Guadeloupe,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1549195,,,2164934.95,2008367.24,1549195,2164934.95,2008367.24,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Ministère de la santé, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Surveillance, monitoring, information, education, prevention, research, control, eradication",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4206,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,4657961,,,6509304.876,6038553.106,4657961,6509304.876,6038553.106,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Ministère de la santé, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Surveillance, monitoring, information, education, prevention, research, control, eradication",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4207,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mangium,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,16681,,,22880.81101,21093.19714,16681,22880.81101,21093.19714,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"GEOPOG association, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4208,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mangium,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,28623,,,39999.44041,37106.688,28623,39999.44041,37106.688,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"GEOPOG association, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4209,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mangium,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,127346,,,177960.6868,165090.6016,127346,177960.6868,165090.6016,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"SOLICAZ Génie Ecologique, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4213,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,NA,N,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,200000,,,303366.9029,259036.2513,200000,303366.9029,259036.2513,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL Martinique, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4214,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Bignoniaceae,Spathodea,Spathodea campanulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,17360,,,24259.87093,22505.40138,17360,24259.87093,22505.40138,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL Martinique, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4215,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,Trachemys scripta elegans,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,N,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12480,,,17440.27587,16178.99823,12480,17440.27587,16178.99823,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DEAL Martinique, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4216,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,25280,,,34675.79296,31966.67008,25280,34675.79296,31966.67008,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONF Martinique, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Original name was a synonym (Herpestes auropunctatus)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4218,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,11250,,,15721.40253,14584.4335,11250,15721.40253,14584.4335,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PNR Martinique, DEAL Martinique, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Original name was a synonym (Herpestes auropunctatus)",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4219,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Tiger mosquito,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,1637851,,,2288827.987,2123300.355,1637851,2288827.987,2123300.355,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Ministère de la santé, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Surveillance, monitoring, information, education, prevention, research, control, eradication",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4220,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cymbopogon,Cymbopogon citratus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,47830,,,66840.41627,62006.52926,47830,66840.41627,62006.52926,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Unspecified,Unspecified,NA,High,,,,,no,"DEAL, Martinique, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4263,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,264548,,,421586.5572,350328.6774,264548,421586.5572,350328.6774,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"APICAN, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4264,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,358329,,,534002.9278,471280.226,358329,534002.9278,471280.226,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"APICAN, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4265,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,401096,,,608396.2563,519492.0212,401096,608396.2563,519492.0212,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"APICAN, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4266,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,499037,,,684513.5954,631034.4596,499037,684513.5954,631034.4596,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"APICAN, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4267,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,535954,,,748973.2064,694807.5974,535954,748973.2064,694807.5974,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"APICAN, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4268,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,1592,,,2537.028437,2108.211948,1592,2537.028437,2108.211948,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4269,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1592,,,2372.491931,2093.824725,1592,2372.491931,2093.824725,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4270,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,1592,,,2414.800547,2061.92856,1592,2414.800547,2061.92856,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4271,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1592,,,2183.697089,2013.090933,1592,2183.697089,2013.090933,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4272,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,59622,,,83319.24104,77293.60835,59622,83319.24104,77293.60835,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4273,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,10056,,,16025.35048,13316.69557,10056,16025.35048,13316.69557,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education/Information/Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"KNS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4274,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,10056,,,14986.04199,13225.81748,10056,14986.04199,13225.81748,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education/Information/Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"KNS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4275,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,10056,,,15253.28788,13024.34271,10056,15253.28788,13024.34271,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education/Information/Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"KNS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4276,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,10056,,,13793.50372,12715.85579,10056,13793.50372,12715.85579,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education/Information/Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"KNS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4277,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,10056,,,14052.83768,13036.53896,10056,14052.83768,13036.53896,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education/Information/Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"KNS, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4278,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,14166,,,21487.47773,18347.53768,14166,21487.47773,18347.53768,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education/Information/Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"AICA-CREG, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4279,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,163244,,,260147.4059,216176.4769,163244,260147.4059,216176.4769,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DDR, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4280,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,31200,,,46496.07301,41034.75591,31200,46496.07301,41034.75591,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DDR, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4281,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,31724,,,48120.05813,41088.33018,31724,48120.05813,41088.33018,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DDR, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4282,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,16629,,,22809.48422,21027.44291,16629,22809.48422,21027.44291,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DDR, PN, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4283,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,132855,,,185659.2829,172232.4367,132855,185659.2829,172232.4367,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DDR, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4312,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,235674,,,375572.6382,312092.175,235674,375572.6382,312092.175,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, CEN PEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4313,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,1752518,,,2611705.285,2304940.653,1752518,2611705.285,2304940.653,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, CEN PEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4314,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,477040,,,723590.7367,617853.2665,477040,723590.7367,617853.2665,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, CEN PEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4315,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,333886,,,457981.0842,422200.3009,333886,457981.0842,422200.3009,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, CEN PEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4316,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Cervidae,Rusa,Rusa timorensis,Rusa timorensis russa,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,273652,,,382417.1774,354760.8352,273652,382417.1774,354760.8352,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, CEN PEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4317,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,11916,,,16344.80811,15067.83389,11916,16344.80811,15067.83389,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV; PN-DDEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4318,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pinopsida,Pinales,Pinaceae,Pinus,Pinus caribaea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,46090,,,64408.83934,59750.80355,46090,64408.83934,59750.80355,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"PN-DDEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4319,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pinopsida,Pinales,Pinaceae,Pinus,Pinus caribaea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,16760,,,26708.91747,22194.49262,16760,26708.91747,22194.49262,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"PN-DDEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4320,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pinopsida,Pinales,Pinaceae,Pinus,Pinus caribaea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,46090,,,64408.83934,59750.80355,46090,64408.83934,59750.80355,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"PN-DDEE, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4321,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,14078,,,22434.85323,18642.8441,14078,22434.85323,18642.8441,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4322,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,39068,,,58221.42886,51382.87961,39068,58221.42886,51382.87961,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4323,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,32521,,,49328.97524,42120.58964,32521,49328.97524,42120.58964,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4324,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,33520,,,45978.34573,42386.18597,33520,45978.34573,42386.18597,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4325,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,29330,,,40987.44322,38023.23862,29330,40987.44322,38023.23862,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4326,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Pycnonotidae,Pycnonotus,Pycnonotus cafer,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,838,,,1171.069806,1086.378246,838,1171.069806,1086.378246,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"LAC, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4327,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Fungi,Basidiomycota,Pucciniomycetes,Pucciniales,Sphaerophragmiaceae,Austropuccinia,Austropuccinia psidii,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,122678,,,171437.3529,159039.034,122678,171437.3529,159039.034,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"DAVAR, CANC, details of the funders available in the source excel file, Original name in document was a synonym: Puccinia psidii",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4330,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,3278,,,5223.856292,4340.903747,3278,5223.856292,4340.903747,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-ENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Synonym of Canis familiaris",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4331,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,3278,,,4885.068184,4311.279804,3278,4885.068184,4311.279804,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PS-ENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Synonym of Canis familiaris",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4332,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,3278,,,4972.183538,4245.604158,3278,4972.183538,4245.604158,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-ENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Synonym of Canis familiaris",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4333,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3278,,,4496.331065,4145.045274,3278,4496.331065,4145.045274,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-ENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Synonym of Canis familiaris",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4334,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3278,,,4580.867333,4249.579823,3278,4580.867333,4249.579823,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-ENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file. Synonym of Canis familiaris",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4345,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,Trachemys scripta elegans,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,7039,,,10676.99815,9116.780863,7039,10676.99815,9116.780863,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4346,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,Trachemys scripta elegans,,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,7039,,,9655.17827,8900.846152,7039,9655.17827,8900.846152,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4347,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Flemingia,Flemingia strobilifera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,5182,,,7107.98889,6552.661566,5182,7107.98889,6552.661566,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"WWF, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4348,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Flemingia,Flemingia strobilifera,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5182,,,7241.62737,6717.914168,5182,7241.62737,6717.914168,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"WWF, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4350,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,2715,,,4046.052507,3570.812894,2715,4046.052507,3570.812894,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4351,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,2715,,,4118.205706,3516.417111,2715,4118.205706,3516.417111,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4352,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2715,,,3724.081404,3433.129323,2715,3724.081404,3433.129323,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4353,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2715,,,3794.098477,3519.709951,2715,3794.098477,3519.709951,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4354,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Wasmannia,Wasmannia auropunctata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,16006,,,22367.71279,20750.08378,16006,22367.71279,20750.08378,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4355,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pinopsida,Pinales,Pinaceae,Pinus,Pinus caribaea,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15084,,,20690.25558,19073.78368,15084,20690.25558,19073.78368,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PN, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4359,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Anoplolepis,Anoplolepis gracilipes,,Yellow crazy ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,30000,,,41923.74008,38891.82266,30000,41923.74008,38891.82266,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"PS-DENV, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4365,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Viruses,Cressdnaviricota,Arfiviricetes,Mulpavirales,Nanoviridae,Babuvirus,Banana bunchy top virus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,15084,,,24038.02572,19975.04336,15084,24038.02572,19975.04336,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CANC, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4366,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Viruses,Cressdnaviricota,Arfiviricetes,Mulpavirales,Nanoviridae,Babuvirus,Banana bunchy top virus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,15084,,,22479.06299,19838.72622,15084,22479.06299,19838.72622,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CANC, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4367,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Viruses,Cressdnaviricota,Arfiviricetes,Mulpavirales,Nanoviridae,Babuvirus,Banana bunchy top virus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,15084,,,22879.93181,19536.51407,15084,22879.93181,19536.51407,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CANC, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4368,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Viruses,Cressdnaviricota,Arfiviricetes,Mulpavirales,Nanoviridae,Babuvirus,Banana bunchy top virus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,15084,,,20690.25558,19073.78368,15084,20690.25558,19073.78368,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CANC, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4369,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Viruses,Cressdnaviricota,Arfiviricetes,Mulpavirales,Nanoviridae,Babuvirus,Banana bunchy top virus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,France,,New Caledonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,15084,,,21079.25651,19554.80843,15084,21079.25651,19554.80843,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"CANC, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4373,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Scorpaeniformes,Scorpaenidae,Pterois,Pterois volitans,,,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Saint-Martin,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,8000,,,10973.3522,10116.03484,8000,10973.3522,10116.03484,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"AGRNNSM, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4374,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Scorpaeniformes,Scorpaenidae,Pterois,Pterois volitans,,,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Saint-Martin,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,7000,,,9782.206019,9074.758621,7000,9782.206019,9074.758621,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication/Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"AGRNNSM, details of the funders available in the source excel file,",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4376,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,4736,,,7547.340879,6271.665694,4736,7547.340879,6271.665694,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Réserve du Grand Connetable (GEPOG), details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4377,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,4736,,,7057.865442,6228.865513,4736,7057.865442,6228.865513,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Réserve du Grand Connetable (GEPOG), details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4378,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4736,,,7183.72826,6133.97843,4736,7183.72826,6133.97843,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Réserve du Grand Connetable (GEPOG), details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4379,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,4736,,,6496.224504,5988.692623,4736,6496.224504,5988.692623,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Réserve du Grand Connetable (GEPOG), details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4380,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,South America,France,,French Guiana,Site,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,4736,,,6618.361101,6139.722404,4736,6618.361101,6139.722404,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Réserve du Grand Connetable (GEPOG), details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4383,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Bignoniaceae,Spathodea,Spathodea campanulata,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,58100,,,79693.97038,73467.703,58100,79693.97038,73467.703,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONF, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4384,TC,FR33,"Analyse économique des espèces exotiques envahissantes en France, Première enquête nationale (2009-2013)","Annelaure Wittmann, Aheli FLores-Ferrer",NA,2015,French,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Rutaceae,Triphasia,Triphasia trifolia,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Central America,France,,Martinique,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,58100,,,79693.97038,73467.703,58100,79693.97038,73467.703,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"ONF, details of the funders available in the source excel file",David Renault/Tasnime Adamjy,Yes
NE4395,TC,FR39,Gestion des jussies en cours d'eau: modalités et coûts des travaux,"LAMBERT E., GENILLON A.,  DUTARTRE A., HAURY J.",NA,2009,French,Conference paper,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,NA,Europe,France,,Landes/ Le Boudigau,Unit (12 650m),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,One-time,289276,,,460993.3657,383074.8238,289276,460993.3657,383074.8238,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Mechanical removal of the species, management of the wastes from the removed species, price without VAT. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4397,TC,FR39,Gestion des jussies en cours d'eau: modalités et coûts des travaux,"LAMBERT E., GENILLON A.,  DUTARTRE A., HAURY J.",NA,2009,French,Conference paper,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia peploides,,,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,NA,Europe,France,,Poitou Charentes/ Marais Poitevin,Unit (96000 ha),2008,Year,2001,2008,2001,2008,One-time,1520000,,,2422288.458,2012865.679,1520000,2422288.458,2012865.679,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Mechanical removal of the species, management of the wastes from the removed species. Destruction of the removed species",David Renault/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
NE4400,GS,AFR_21,Evaluation de la prolifération de la jacinthe d'eau du lac Ravelobe Ankarafantsika et plan de restauration,"Hery Lisy Tiana Ranarijaona, Félicie Zainabo, Andriamanentena Ainazo Herilala, Andrianasetra Georges Simon","The floating water hyacinth or Eicchornia crassipes invades Madagascar waters lotics and lentics. It's the case of the lake Ravelobe, inside the national park of Ankarafantsika Mahajanga Madagascar, which, besides crocodiles, is very renowned by its wealth endemic fishes, amphibians, aquatic turtle, and birds. In spite of the measures taken by the persons in charge of the park in 2007, by manual eradicated of the hyacinth by the villagers, the hyacinth proliferates in important scale. Regulation's methods of the invasive species, besides quadrat and transects are applied to the plant, with the aim of estimating their ecology and the proliferation. Stable, the hyacinth invades almost half of the lake in wet season : it's monospecific in many aquatic zones, or retained by the stalks of helophytes ; forms a nursery in the river which feds the lake. Entailes by the wind, it invades in a scattered way the entire free surface's water. Ten plant groups were listed, all associated with Eichhornia crassipes. Three ecological factors are responsible in their distribution. Both maps of vegetations in wet and dry season present the distribution of hyacinth with their species associate. The biomass as well as the density of hyacinth are important. The lake is filled because of the degraded basin hillside's erosion. The lake takes a convex aspect. The river which feds the lake searches an outcome deviant to feed the lake. The fragmentation of the ecosystem Ravelobe is felt. Human and birds have difficulties to fish within the water hyacinth proliferated. Recommandations are advances to regulate water hyacinth and maintain the biodiversity. ",2013,French,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Liliales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,Aquatic,11,Y,Africa,Madagascar,,Lac Ravelobe/ National Park of Ankarafantsika/ Mahajanga,Site,1 year,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,2491000,,,1187.6552,3627.65913,2491000,1187.6552,3627.65913,MGA,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Original source : personal communication,Tasnime Adamjy/Gauthier Dobigny/CheikhAbdouKhadreMbacke DIA,Yes
NE4408,GS,AFR_29,La maîtrise de l'enherbement des cultures de céréales en Côte d'Ivoire,"P. Verner, T.H. Gbaka, K.E. Tehia, P. Marnotte","In forest areas of Côte d'Ivoire, rainfed rice is widely grown following slash-and-burn, and is sometimes intercropped with maize. However, smallholders are often forced to abandon their fields, even before soil fertility problems arise, because of the invasion weed Chromolaena odorata. From 1989 to 1991, IDESSA (Institut des savanes) conducted a herbicide control research programme using 2,4-D in smallholders' fields. The number, dosages, treatment dates and toxicity on maize were monitored. The results indicated that two 2,4-D treatments should be recommended at 770-1440 g a.i./ha/treatment, depending on weed densities: the first at the C. odorata 3-4 leaf stage, the second 8 days later. There was no toxicity noted on maize plants. Nozzles on conventional spraying equipment were adapted for low-volume spraying to minimize water transport and working time. This technique is faster, cheamer and as efficient as manual weeding. ",1995,French,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Siam weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural Habitat: rice culture,12b,N,Africa,Ivory Coast,,Ivory Coast,Country,10-15 days,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1995,1995,Potentially ongoing,15000,,,95.69847385,239.8304363,15000,95.69847385,239.8304363,XOF,1991,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Coût par hectare de 10 à 15 jours de travail pour un desherbage main d'auvres salariée C. odorata,Tasnime Adamjy/Gauthier Dobigny/CheikhAbdouKhadreMbacke DIA,Yes
NE4418,Go,AFR_34,"Gestion durable de la chenille légionnaire d'automne en Afrique, Programme d'action de la FAO",FAO,NA,2017,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Grass worm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural Habitat: corn culture,12b,N,Africa,Zambia,,Zambia,Country,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,3000000,,,3000000,,3000000,3000000,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Allocation du gouvernement zambien aux petits producteurs familiaux de maïs en 2017 pour lutter contre la chenille légionnaire, pour acheter des pesticides et replanter 90000 hectares touchés",Tasnime Adamjy/Gauthier Dobigny/CheikhAbdouKhadreMbacke DIA,Yes
NE4419,Go,AFR_34,"Gestion durable de la chenille légionnaire d'automne en Afrique, Programme d'action de la FAO",FAO,NA,2017,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Grass worm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural Habitat: corn culture,12b,N,Africa,Ghana,,Ghana,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,One-time,4000000,,,4000000,,4000000,4000000,,USD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Argent distribué par le gouvernement ghanéen dans le cadre de mesures d'urgence contre la chenille légionnaire, visant à fournir des produits phytosanitaires",Tasnime Adamjy/Gauthier Dobigny/CheikhAbdouKhadreMbacke DIA,Yes
NE4431,TC,PRA report,Pest risk assessment of Cydalima perspectalis Walker. for the territory of Russian Federation,"Gninenko Yu.I., Fedosov S.A.",not applicable (no permission to retrieve from PRA report),2014,Russian,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Cydalima,Cydalima perspectalis,,Box tree moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forest,1,Y,Europe,Russia,,Krasnodar Krai,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,35000000,,,944271.2356,,35000000,944271.2356,,RUB,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,direct & indirect loss (environment),Natalia Kirichenko/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE4432,TC,PRA report,Pest risk assessment of Cydalima perspectalis Walker. for the territory of Russian Federation,"Gninenko Yu.I., Fedosov S.A.",not applicable (no permission to retrieve from PRA report),2015,Russian,Unpublished material,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Cydalima,Cydalima perspectalis,,Box tree moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forest,1,Y,Europe,Russia,,Krasnodar Krai,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,40000000,,,1079167.126,,40000000,1079167.126,,RUB,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,indirect loss (tourism),Natalia Kirichenko/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE4433,Go,RUS2,Emerald ash borer: catastrophe postponed?,"Gninenko Y.I., Kliukin M.S., Khegai I.V. ","After emergence in the European Russia the emerald ash borer acclimatized ash greeneries in inhabited localities, shelterbelts and forests in a number of regions in the central part of the country and caused significant
damage. However, from 2013 onwards apparent reduction of borers and improvement of ash condition were registered.n The article reports information about pest parasitoids and shows ashes recovery after cessation of borer attacks.
",2016,Russian,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Buprestidae,Agrilus,Agrilus planipennis,,Emeral ash borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agriculture,12b,N,Europe,Russia,,Moscow Oblast,Site,2010-2016,Period,2010,2016,2010,2016,Potentially ongoing,17000000000,,,258919946.9,,17000000000,258919946.9,,RUB,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Natalia Kirichenko/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE4521,TC,PT2,Gestão do jacinto-aquático (Eichhornia crassipes) na Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de Xira.,"Monteiro, A., Moreira, I., Santos, A. C., & Serrasqueiro, P. M.","O impacto ambiental da aplicação de herbicidas (glifosato – sal de isopropilamónio e sal de sódio)
foi revisto, conduzindo à decisão da sua utilização no controlo do jacinto-aquático [Eichhornia
crassipes (C. F. Mart) Solms], efectuada desde 2000 nos canais da Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de
Xira, na bacia do rio Tejo. Os custos da remoção mecânica do jacinto-aquático nestes canais bem como da aplicação de herbicidas, durante o período 1999/2002, foram estimados. Uma redução substancial nos custos, de
cerca de 74%, verificou-se com a introdução da luta química.
O nível de infestação do jacinto-aquático e do caniço foi avaliado durante a Primavera de 2003.",2003,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Common water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Water stream,10,N,Europe,Portugal,,Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de Xira,Site,1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,158876,,,196982.6149,327886.7916,158876,196982.6149,327886.7916,EUR,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,1696(NE4521),no,,Cesar Capinha,No
NE4522,TC,PT2,Gestão do jacinto-aquático (Eichhornia crassipes) na Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de Xira.,"Monteiro, A., Moreira, I., Santos, A. C., & Serrasqueiro, P. M.","O impacto ambiental da aplicação de herbicidas (glifosato – sal de isopropilamónio e sal de sódio)
foi revisto, conduzindo à decisão da sua utilização no controlo do jacinto-aquático [Eichhornia
crassipes (C. F. Mart) Solms], efectuada desde 2000 nos canais da Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de
Xira, na bacia do rio Tejo. Os custos da remoção mecânica do jacinto-aquático nestes canais bem como da aplicação de herbicidas, durante o período 1999/2002, foram estimados. Uma redução substancial nos custos, de
cerca de 74%, verificou-se com a introdução da luta química.
O nível de infestação do jacinto-aquático e do caniço foi avaliado durante a Primavera de 2003.",2003,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Common water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Water stream,10,N,Europe,Portugal,,Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de Xira,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,167319,,,207450.6794,345311.3754,167319,207450.6794,345311.3754,EUR,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Cesar Capinha,No
NE4523,TC,PT2,Gestão do jacinto-aquático (Eichhornia crassipes) na Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de Xira.,"Monteiro, A., Moreira, I., Santos, A. C., & Serrasqueiro, P. M.","O impacto ambiental da aplicação de herbicidas (glifosato – sal de isopropilamónio e sal de sódio)
foi revisto, conduzindo à decisão da sua utilização no controlo do jacinto-aquático [Eichhornia
crassipes (C. F. Mart) Solms], efectuada desde 2000 nos canais da Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de
Xira, na bacia do rio Tejo. Os custos da remoção mecânica do jacinto-aquático nestes canais bem como da aplicação de herbicidas, durante o período 1999/2002, foram estimados. Uma redução substancial nos custos, de
cerca de 74%, verificou-se com a introdução da luta química.
O nível de infestação do jacinto-aquático e do caniço foi avaliado durante a Primavera de 2003.",2003,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Common water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Water stream,10,N,Europe,Portugal,,Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de Xira,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,98526,,,122157.5891,203337.0303,98526,122157.5891,203337.0303,EUR,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Cesar Capinha,No
NE4524,TC,PT2,Gestão do jacinto-aquático (Eichhornia crassipes) na Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de Xira.,"Monteiro, A., Moreira, I., Santos, A. C., & Serrasqueiro, P. M.","O impacto ambiental da aplicação de herbicidas (glifosato – sal de isopropilamónio e sal de sódio)
foi revisto, conduzindo à decisão da sua utilização no controlo do jacinto-aquático [Eichhornia
crassipes (C. F. Mart) Solms], efectuada desde 2000 nos canais da Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de
Xira, na bacia do rio Tejo. Os custos da remoção mecânica do jacinto-aquático nestes canais bem como da aplicação de herbicidas, durante o período 1999/2002, foram estimados. Uma redução substancial nos custos, de
cerca de 74%, verificou-se com a introdução da luta química.
O nível de infestação do jacinto-aquático e do caniço foi avaliado durante a Primavera de 2003.",2003,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Common water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Water stream,10,N,Europe,Portugal,,Lezíria Grande de Vila Franca de Xira,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,26055,,,32304.32559,53772.06347,26055,32304.32559,53772.06347,EUR,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control/Maintenance,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Cesar Capinha,No
NE4530,WoS,BZ1,Roçagem e aplicação de herbicida para controle de Megathyrsus maximus: danos sobre a vegetação preexistente em um reflorestamento de 20 anos,"Mantoani, M.C., Dias, J., Torezan, J.M.D.","The need to control exotic grasses in areas of ecological restoration for long periods is followed by high economical costs of application, collateral damage on regeneration and other less obvious environmental harms. Thus, it is necessary estimate such drawbacks in order to evaluate the cost/benefit rate of the application of these techniques. This study aimed to assess the damage caused by two control techniques of Guinea-grass (Megathyrsus maximus (Jacq.) B. K Simon & S. W. L. Jacobs), on pre-existing regeneration (environmental costs) in a 20-year reforestation site and estimate the economic costs of employing such techniques. Thirty 10 x 20m plots were divided into three groups: (CON) control, (ROC) mowing (using gas-powered brush cutters) and (HERB) mowing followed by the application of a glyphosate-based herbicide. We did a permanent inventory of all tree and shrub individuals, who were followed over a period of one year. No differences were found in mortality imposed by the initial mowing, neither in the mortality imposed exclusively by mowing nor in the mortality imposed exclusively by herbicide in HERB. After one year, there were no differences between mortality and species richness of the three groups. However, when the three groups were compared with themselves after one year, for plants > 1 m, we found a reduction on abundance in CON and reduction in species richness in HERB; whereas for plants < 1 m, ROC showed a reduction in abundance and HERB showed reduced abundance and species richness. Therefore, both techniques seem to affect more plants < 1 m (i.e., regeneration). The final economic cost of ROC was 34.1% bigger than the cost of HERB, and in spite of a likely reduction in costs to perform new interventions, proportional costs increased for scattered interventions over small areas. Both techniques were efficient to control Guinea-grass, but the use of glyphosate-based herbicide should be restricted to areas with low canopy cover, more maintenance-demanding sites, once the technique is more damaging on regeneration, since there was high mortality (73%) of individuals < 1 m in areas with dense grass infestation (100%). ",2016,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Panicum,Panicum maximum,,Guinea grass or green panic grass,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Forest,1,Y,South America,Brazil,,Parque Estadual “Mata dos Godoy”/ Londrina/ Paraná state,Unit (ha),2011-2012,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,One-time,2176,,,1189.485148,1491.065762,2176,1189.485148,1491.065762,REA,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Thirty 10 x 20m plots were divided into three groups: (CON) control, (ROC) mowing (using gas-powered brush cutters) and (HERB) mowing followed by the application of a glyphosate-based herbicide. Original name in document was a synonym (Megathyrsus maximus)",Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4531,WoS,BZ1,Roçagem e aplicação de herbicida para controle de Megathyrsus maximus: danos sobre a vegetação preexistente em um reflorestamento de 20 anos,"Mantoani, M.C., Dias, J., Torezan, J.M.D.","The need to control exotic grasses in areas of ecological restoration for long periods is followed by high economical costs of application, collateral damage on regeneration and other less obvious environmental harms. Thus, it is necessary estimate such drawbacks in order to evaluate the cost/benefit rate of the application of these techniques. This study aimed to assess the damage caused by two control techniques of Guinea-grass (Megathyrsus maximus (Jacq.) B. K Simon & S. W. L. Jacobs), on pre-existing regeneration (environmental costs) in a 20-year reforestation site and estimate the economic costs of employing such techniques. Thirty 10 x 20m plots were divided into three groups: (CON) control, (ROC) mowing (using gas-powered brush cutters) and (HERB) mowing followed by the application of a glyphosate-based herbicide. We did a permanent inventory of all tree and shrub individuals, who were followed over a period of one year. No differences were found in mortality imposed by the initial mowing, neither in the mortality imposed exclusively by mowing nor in the mortality imposed exclusively by herbicide in HERB. After one year, there were no differences between mortality and species richness of the three groups. However, when the three groups were compared with themselves after one year, for plants > 1 m, we found a reduction on abundance in CON and reduction in species richness in HERB; whereas for plants < 1 m, ROC showed a reduction in abundance and HERB showed reduced abundance and species richness. Therefore, both techniques seem to affect more plants < 1 m (i.e., regeneration). The final economic cost of ROC was 34.1% bigger than the cost of HERB, and in spite of a likely reduction in costs to perform new interventions, proportional costs increased for scattered interventions over small areas. Both techniques were efficient to control Guinea-grass, but the use of glyphosate-based herbicide should be restricted to areas with low canopy cover, more maintenance-demanding sites, once the technique is more damaging on regeneration, since there was high mortality (73%) of individuals < 1 m in areas with dense grass infestation (100%). ",2016,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Panicum,Panicum maximum,,Guinea grass or green panic grass,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Forest,1,Y,South America,Brazil,,Parque Estadual “Mata dos Godoy”/ Londrina/ Paraná state,Unit (ha),2011-2012,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,One-time,1435,,,784.426097,983.3085331,1435,784.426097,983.3085331,REA,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Thirty 10 x 20m plots were divided into three groups: (CON) control, (ROC) mowing (using gas-powered brush cutters) and (HERB) mowing followed by the application of a glyphosate-based herbicide. Original name in document was a synonym (Megathyrsus maximus)",Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4532,TC,BZ2,Invasão e manejo de Pinus taeda em Campos de Altitude do Parque Estadual do Pico Paraná -Brasil,"Falleiros, R.M. et al.","Invasion and managment of Pinus taeda in mountain top grasslands of Pico Paraná State Park, Paraná, Brazil. Invasive alien species are introduced from other ecosystems and establish, producing viable descendency that spread for significant distances from the mother plants, potentially cause damage to the environment. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the first responses of the invasion process and the results of Pinus taeda control on three mountain areas in the Pico Paraná State Park, Southern Brazil. The control was conducted mechanically by felling adult trees and pulling out seedlings. The first responses were measured ten months after felling, measuring plant coverage and species richness. Results indicate that the population of invasive pines in these areas is around 36 years old, growing at a slower rate when compared to the average growth in other habitats, that the pine trees impact the native vegetation by producing lower coverage and finally, that after felling the pine trees the native vegetation showed lower richness. The control method had a cost of R$ 199,00 (about US$ 100) per hectare. Conclusions are that high mountain grasslands are susceptible habitats for biological invasion by pine trees and that recurrent work needs to be done for more consistent elucidations.",2010,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Pinopsida,Pinales,Pinaceae,Pinus,Pinus taeda,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Altitude Grasslands (Campos de Altitude),4a,Y,South America,Brazil,,Pico do Panará State Park/ Paraná,Unit (ha),20 days,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,100,,,112.4115573,,100,112.4115573,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Total cost of R$ 33000.00 (640 hours or 20 days of work). The same reference found in the GS search,Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4533,TC,BZ3,Aedes aegypti e sociedade: o impacto econômico das arboviroses no Brasil,"Teich, V., Arinelli, R., Fahham, L.","Objective: Arboviruses are a cause of concern for public health, with negative clinical and econo­mic impacts. The objective of this study was to evaluate costs of vector control, direct medical costs and indirect costs associated with classical dengue fever, dengue hemorrhagic fever, chikungunya and Zika virus infection in Brazil for the year 2016. Methods: The analyzes quantified costs related to vector control, such as federal resource transfers and acquisition of pesticides, direct medical costs related to diseases treatment through outpatient and hospital management, and indirect costs re­lated to absenteeism, calculated from published studies or estimates of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Results: The investment for vector combat was R$ 1.5 billion in Brazil and the cost reported by federal government for the acquisition of insecticides and larvicides was R$ 78.6 million. Direct medical costs generated total expenses of R$ 374 million. Fever chikungunya presented the highest number of DALYs lost per episode of disease (0.036 DALYs), followed by Zika virus infection (0.005 DALYs). Total indirect cost was estimated at R$ 431 million. Total costs with the management of ar­boviroses reached an impact of R$ 2.3 billion in Brazil for 2016. Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Bahia and Rio de Janeiro presented the highest costs. Conclusions: Arboviroses generate considerable economic and social impact to Brazil. Vector combat costs, direct medical costs and indirect costs account for about 2% of the health budget expected for the country in 2016.",2017,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,NA,NA,N,South America,Brazil,,Brazil,Country,2016,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,One-time,1470990760,,,430303527.6,757681551.7,1470990760,430303527.6,757681551.7,REA,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Dengue, chikungunya, and zika",Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4534,TC,BZ3,Aedes aegypti e sociedade: o impacto econômico das arboviroses no Brasil,"Teich, V., Arinelli, R., Fahham, L.","Objective: Arboviruses are a cause of concern for public health, with negative clinical and econo­mic impacts. The objective of this study was to evaluate costs of vector control, direct medical costs and indirect costs associated with classical dengue fever, dengue hemorrhagic fever, chikungunya and Zika virus infection in Brazil for the year 2016. Methods: The analyzes quantified costs related to vector control, such as federal resource transfers and acquisition of pesticides, direct medical costs related to diseases treatment through outpatient and hospital management, and indirect costs re­lated to absenteeism, calculated from published studies or estimates of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Results: The investment for vector combat was R$ 1.5 billion in Brazil and the cost reported by federal government for the acquisition of insecticides and larvicides was R$ 78.6 million. Direct medical costs generated total expenses of R$ 374 million. Fever chikungunya presented the highest number of DALYs lost per episode of disease (0.036 DALYs), followed by Zika virus infection (0.005 DALYs). Total indirect cost was estimated at R$ 431 million. Total costs with the management of ar­boviroses reached an impact of R$ 2.3 billion in Brazil for 2016. Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Bahia and Rio de Janeiro presented the highest costs. Conclusions: Arboviroses generate considerable economic and social impact to Brazil. Vector combat costs, direct medical costs and indirect costs account for about 2% of the health budget expected for the country in 2016.",2017,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,NA,NA,N,South America,Brazil,,Brazil,Country,2016,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,One-time,373930532,,,109384526,192605061.4,373930532,109384526,192605061.4,REA,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Dengue, chikungunya, and zika",Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4535,TC,BZ3,Aedes aegypti e sociedade: o impacto econômico das arboviroses no Brasil,"Teich, V., Arinelli, R., Fahham, L.","Objective: Arboviruses are a cause of concern for public health, with negative clinical and econo­mic impacts. The objective of this study was to evaluate costs of vector control, direct medical costs and indirect costs associated with classical dengue fever, dengue hemorrhagic fever, chikungunya and Zika virus infection in Brazil for the year 2016. Methods: The analyzes quantified costs related to vector control, such as federal resource transfers and acquisition of pesticides, direct medical costs related to diseases treatment through outpatient and hospital management, and indirect costs re­lated to absenteeism, calculated from published studies or estimates of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Results: The investment for vector combat was R$ 1.5 billion in Brazil and the cost reported by federal government for the acquisition of insecticides and larvicides was R$ 78.6 million. Direct medical costs generated total expenses of R$ 374 million. Fever chikungunya presented the highest number of DALYs lost per episode of disease (0.036 DALYs), followed by Zika virus infection (0.005 DALYs). Total indirect cost was estimated at R$ 431 million. Total costs with the management of ar­boviroses reached an impact of R$ 2.3 billion in Brazil for 2016. Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Bahia and Rio de Janeiro presented the highest costs. Conclusions: Arboviroses generate considerable economic and social impact to Brazil. Vector combat costs, direct medical costs and indirect costs account for about 2% of the health budget expected for the country in 2016.",2017,Portuguese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,NA,NA,NA,N,South America,Brazil,,Brazil,Country,2016,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2017,2017,One-time,431272105,,,126158445.9,222140700.4,431272105,126158445.9,222140700.4,REA,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Indirect costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Dengue, chikungunya, and zika",Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4536,TC,BZ4,Invasão do campo cerrado por braquiária (Urochloa decumbens): perdas de diversidade e técnicas de restauração,"Assis, G.B.","A invasão por gramíneas exóticas em ecossistemas tropicais tem levado a perdas de diversidade e a modificação na estrutura de comunidades de plantas. Dentre essas espécies, Urochloa decumbens representa uma das principais ameaças à conservação de ecossistemas savânicos no Brasil e forte obstáculo para ações de restauração. Realizamos um experimento testando diferentes estratégias de manejo para a erradicação de U. decumbens em campo cerrado, na Estação Ecológica de Santa Bárbara, sudeste do Brasil. Testamos seis tratamentos (com cinco réplicas), que incluíram a aplicação isolada de fogo, herbicidas, capina manual e a combinação desses tratamentos. Avaliamos comparativamente as técnicas pelos seus custos e pela recuperação da riqueza e estrutura da comunidade vegetal. Todos os tratamentos foram eficazes no controle da invasão, exceto a aplicação isolada de fogo. Porém, o fogo otimizou as técnicas baseadas na capina e em herbicidas, reduzindo o seu custo e estimulando a regeneração natural, que ocorreu predominantemente por rebrota de estruturas subterrâneas. A germinação de U.decumbens também foi reduzida no banco de sementes de tratamentos com uso de fogo. Os tratamentos com glifosato apresentaram maior viabilidade econômica, porém, exerceram grande impacto sobre as plantas nativas. Técnicas baseadas na capina foram as menos impactantes sobre a vegetação nativa, mas tiveram os maiores custos. Se precedida pelo fogo, a capina teve o custo reduzido em 42%. Verificamos um trade-off entre custos e benefícios nas ações de manejo, uma vez que as técnicas mais viáveis economicamente não facilitam a recuperação das espécies nativas em curto prazo, o que deve ser levado em consideração nas decisões de manejo.",2017,Portuguese,Thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Brachiaria,Brachiaria eminii,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Savanna (Cerrado), Scrub and Grasslands",3\4,Y,South America,Brazil,,Santa Bárbara Ecological Station/ municipality of Águas de Santa Bárbara,Unit (ha),2013-2015,Period,2013,2015,2013,2015,One-time,1767.5,,,517.0402872,910.4082629,589.1666667,172.3467624,303.469421,REA,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Per hectare. Herbicide (glyphosate). Original name in document was a synonym (Urochloa decumbens),Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4537,TC,BZ4,Invasão do campo cerrado por braquiária (Urochloa decumbens): perdas de diversidade e técnicas de restauração,"Assis, G.B.","A invasão por gramíneas exóticas em ecossistemas tropicais tem levado a perdas de diversidade e a modificação na estrutura de comunidades de plantas. Dentre essas espécies, Urochloa decumbens representa uma das principais ameaças à conservação de ecossistemas savânicos no Brasil e forte obstáculo para ações de restauração. Realizamos um experimento testando diferentes estratégias de manejo para a erradicação de U. decumbens em campo cerrado, na Estação Ecológica de Santa Bárbara, sudeste do Brasil. Testamos seis tratamentos (com cinco réplicas), que incluíram a aplicação isolada de fogo, herbicidas, capina manual e a combinação desses tratamentos. Avaliamos comparativamente as técnicas pelos seus custos e pela recuperação da riqueza e estrutura da comunidade vegetal. Todos os tratamentos foram eficazes no controle da invasão, exceto a aplicação isolada de fogo. Porém, o fogo otimizou as técnicas baseadas na capina e em herbicidas, reduzindo o seu custo e estimulando a regeneração natural, que ocorreu predominantemente por rebrota de estruturas subterrâneas. A germinação de U.decumbens também foi reduzida no banco de sementes de tratamentos com uso de fogo. Os tratamentos com glifosato apresentaram maior viabilidade econômica, porém, exerceram grande impacto sobre as plantas nativas. Técnicas baseadas na capina foram as menos impactantes sobre a vegetação nativa, mas tiveram os maiores custos. Se precedida pelo fogo, a capina teve o custo reduzido em 42%. Verificamos um trade-off entre custos e benefícios nas ações de manejo, uma vez que as técnicas mais viáveis economicamente não facilitam a recuperação das espécies nativas em curto prazo, o que deve ser levado em consideração nas decisões de manejo.",2017,Portuguese,Thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Brachiaria,Brachiaria eminii,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Savanna (Cerrado), Scrub and Grasslands",3\4,Y,South America,Brazil,,Santa Bárbara Ecological Station/ municipality of Águas de Santa Bárbara,Unit (ha),2013-2015,Period,2013,2015,2013,2015,One-time,16075,,,4702.360745,8279.95068,5358.333333,1567.453582,2759.98356,REA,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Per hectare. Mowing Original name in document was a synonym (Urochloa decumbens),Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4538,TC,BZ4,Invasão do campo cerrado por braquiária (Urochloa decumbens): perdas de diversidade e técnicas de restauração,"Assis, G.B.","A invasão por gramíneas exóticas em ecossistemas tropicais tem levado a perdas de diversidade e a modificação na estrutura de comunidades de plantas. Dentre essas espécies, Urochloa decumbens representa uma das principais ameaças à conservação de ecossistemas savânicos no Brasil e forte obstáculo para ações de restauração. Realizamos um experimento testando diferentes estratégias de manejo para a erradicação de U. decumbens em campo cerrado, na Estação Ecológica de Santa Bárbara, sudeste do Brasil. Testamos seis tratamentos (com cinco réplicas), que incluíram a aplicação isolada de fogo, herbicidas, capina manual e a combinação desses tratamentos. Avaliamos comparativamente as técnicas pelos seus custos e pela recuperação da riqueza e estrutura da comunidade vegetal. Todos os tratamentos foram eficazes no controle da invasão, exceto a aplicação isolada de fogo. Porém, o fogo otimizou as técnicas baseadas na capina e em herbicidas, reduzindo o seu custo e estimulando a regeneração natural, que ocorreu predominantemente por rebrota de estruturas subterrâneas. A germinação de U.decumbens também foi reduzida no banco de sementes de tratamentos com uso de fogo. Os tratamentos com glifosato apresentaram maior viabilidade econômica, porém, exerceram grande impacto sobre as plantas nativas. Técnicas baseadas na capina foram as menos impactantes sobre a vegetação nativa, mas tiveram os maiores custos. Se precedida pelo fogo, a capina teve o custo reduzido em 42%. Verificamos um trade-off entre custos e benefícios nas ações de manejo, uma vez que as técnicas mais viáveis economicamente não facilitam a recuperação das espécies nativas em curto prazo, o que deve ser levado em consideração nas decisões de manejo.",2017,Portuguese,Thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Brachiaria,Brachiaria eminii,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Savanna (Cerrado), Scrub and Grasslands",3\4,Y,South America,Brazil,,Santa Bárbara Ecological Station/ municipality of Águas de Santa Bárbara,Unit (ha),2013-2015,Period,2013,2015,2013,2015,One-time,1702.5,,,498.0260758,876.9279025,567.5,166.0086919,292.3093008,REA,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Per hectare. Fire and glyphosate. Original name in document was a synonym (Urochloa decumbens),Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4539,TC,BZ4,Invasão do campo cerrado por braquiária (Urochloa decumbens): perdas de diversidade e técnicas de restauração,"Assis, G.B.","A invasão por gramíneas exóticas em ecossistemas tropicais tem levado a perdas de diversidade e a modificação na estrutura de comunidades de plantas. Dentre essas espécies, Urochloa decumbens representa uma das principais ameaças à conservação de ecossistemas savânicos no Brasil e forte obstáculo para ações de restauração. Realizamos um experimento testando diferentes estratégias de manejo para a erradicação de U. decumbens em campo cerrado, na Estação Ecológica de Santa Bárbara, sudeste do Brasil. Testamos seis tratamentos (com cinco réplicas), que incluíram a aplicação isolada de fogo, herbicidas, capina manual e a combinação desses tratamentos. Avaliamos comparativamente as técnicas pelos seus custos e pela recuperação da riqueza e estrutura da comunidade vegetal. Todos os tratamentos foram eficazes no controle da invasão, exceto a aplicação isolada de fogo. Porém, o fogo otimizou as técnicas baseadas na capina e em herbicidas, reduzindo o seu custo e estimulando a regeneração natural, que ocorreu predominantemente por rebrota de estruturas subterrâneas. A germinação de U.decumbens também foi reduzida no banco de sementes de tratamentos com uso de fogo. Os tratamentos com glifosato apresentaram maior viabilidade econômica, porém, exerceram grande impacto sobre as plantas nativas. Técnicas baseadas na capina foram as menos impactantes sobre a vegetação nativa, mas tiveram os maiores custos. Se precedida pelo fogo, a capina teve o custo reduzido em 42%. Verificamos um trade-off entre custos e benefícios nas ações de manejo, uma vez que as técnicas mais viáveis economicamente não facilitam a recuperação das espécies nativas em curto prazo, o que deve ser levado em consideração nas decisões de manejo.",2017,Portuguese,Thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Brachiaria,Brachiaria eminii,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Savanna (Cerrado), Scrub and Grasslands",3\4,Y,South America,Brazil,,Santa Bárbara Ecological Station/ municipality of Águas de Santa Bárbara,Unit (ha),2013-2015,Period,2013,2015,2013,2015,One-time,6795,,,1987.716408,3499.985373,2265,662.5721361,1166.661791,REA,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Per hectare. Fire, mowing and selective herbicide (Haloxyfop-R methyl ester). Original name in document was a synonym (Urochloa decumbens)",Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4545,GS,BZ8,"Controle de gramíneas exóticas invasoras em área de restauração ecológica com plantio total, Floresta Estacional Semidecidual - Itu - SP","Martins, A.F.","The activity of forest restoration is often performed in areas covered by exotic grasses. In this way, the weed control of these plants is a determining factor in the success of restoration. This project aims to test different interventions for Urochloa decumbens Stapf. control in an area of forest restoration with seedlings planting in total area. The design adopted was split plot treatments divided in blocks, with each plot with different kind of soil tillage systems: 1. Tillage (no soil movement) and 2. Harrowing (ground motion); and subplots with: 1. Herbicide application in the installation and during maintenance (H); 2. herbicide application and planting of bean (Canavalia ensiformis DC.) in the installation and maintenance on mowing (FP + H); 3. herbicide application and planting beans (Cajanus cajan L.) in the installation and maintenance on mowing (H + FG); 4. planting bean (Canavalia ensiformis DC.) in the installation and maintenance on mowing (FP), 5. planting bean (Cajanus cajan L.) in the installation and maintenance on mowing (FG); and 6. no herbicide application nor planting green manure in the installation and the maintenance on mowing (s / Hs / AV). The grass height and percentage of occupation in of the soil was measured, as well the height, canopy area and mortality of seedlings, all of them analyzed by the SAS statistical package. In the period between planting and first maintenance (3 months), the living roofs in the interaction R (H + FP) and R (H + FG) controlled the percentage of invasive exotic grasses in the soil, and the treatments (H + FP) and (H + FG) controlled the height of grasses in the first month. After the first maintenance, only the treatment (H) controlled the grasses in percentage of occupancy in the soil and height. Regarding the variables referred to the seedlings, only the canopy area showed a significant difference between treatments (H) and (s / Hs / AV) 7 months after planting and the (H) treatment showed a difference among all others, 9 months after planting,, as well it’s showed the biggest area. In this experiment the use of green manure in the area of forest restoration did not improve seedling growth. The (H) treatment was the one that promotes the Urochloa decumbens Stapf. control for a longer time and the seedlings with the largest canopy area.",2011,Portuguese,M.Sc. Dissertation,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Brachiaria,Brachiaria eminii,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Semideciduous Forest,1,N,South America,Brazil,,Itu/ São Paulo,Unit (ha),2009,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,One-time,4253.06,,,4859.340324,,4253.06,4859.340324,,USD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Avaliar a efetividade de diferentes técnicas de controle de Urochloa decumbens Stapf. No desenvolvimento de mudas plantadas de espécies arbóreas nativas em projeto de restauração ecológica Original name in document was a synonym (Urochloa decumbens),Gustavo Heringer/Chritophe Diagne,Yes
NE4553,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,1,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1400000,830000,2500000,1803975.498,2089018.224,1400000,1803975.498,2089018.224,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Conservative estimates of the expenses associated with hindering normal forestry practices within current problem areas (228 km2, of which 88 % falls within timber stands, and 11 % in conservation areas or wildlife refuges)",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4554,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12a,N,Europe,Germany,,Berlin,Site,1997-1999,Period,1997,1999,1997,1999,One-time,58000,,,74736.12776,86545.04073,19333.33333,24912.04259,28848.34691,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"In Berlin, for example, contracts for removal of black cherry costing € 58,000 per annum have been issued for 1997, 1998, and 1999. Data are for the City (spatial scale)",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4555,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,1,Y,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,3400000,1500000,3700000,4381083.351,5073329.974,3400000,4381083.351,5073329.974,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculations are based on current average problem areas (228 km2, of which 88 % falls within timber stands, and 11 % in conservation areas or wildlife refuges) within conservation areas",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4556,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,1,N,Europe,Germany,,Berlin,Unit (7.5 km2),Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,One-time,130000,,,167512.0105,193980.2637,130000,167512.0105,193980.2637,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Eradication efforts against black chery in a Berlin forest were undertaken across a 7.5 square kilometer region.,Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4559,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12a,N,Europe,Germany,,Cottbus municipality,Unit (2.5 ha),1996-1997,Year,1996,1997,1996,1997,One-time,270000,,,347909.5603,402882.0861,270000,347909.5603,402882.0861,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"…. the municipality of Cottbus cleared an area of 2.5 hectares in years 1996 and 1997, at a cost of € 270,000. Efforts were successful on approximately on hectare (Buchan (2002). Umweltamt Cottbus, Personal communication).",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE4561,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,Common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12a,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,32100000,17000000,47000000,41362581.05,47898203.57,32100000,41362581.05,47898203.57,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,".... costs occasioned by the presence of this new resident were assigned by calculating the proportion of allergic disease attributable to ragweed. Calculations are based upon information from 2 sources, both of which are expert opinion regarding the proportion of allergies (hay fever and asthma) due to ragweed in Germany (Fenner, D. (2002). Allergologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Fenner, Fachärzte für Laboratoriumsmedizin und Infektionsepidemiologie) , Personal communication; Bergmann, P.D. (2002). Allergologische Klinik Bad Lippspringe. Personal Communication.)KQ",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4562,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Ophiostomatales,Ophiostomataceae,Ophiostoma,Ophiostoma ulmi,,Dutch elm disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12a,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,3200000,2200000,8400000,4123372.566,4774898.799,3200000,4123372.566,4774898.799,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Lost value is equivalent to € 3.2 million.,Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4563,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Ophiostomatales,Ophiostomataceae,Ophiostoma,Ophiostoma ulmi,,Dutch elm disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1700000,1200000,4600000,2190541.676,2536664.987,1700000,2190541.676,2536664.987,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Costs of € 1.7 million per year are incurred for tree removal and replanting.,Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4564,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Ophiostomatales,Ophiostomataceae,Ophiostoma,Ophiostoma ulmi,,Dutch elm disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,160000,110000,420000,206168.6283,238744.9399,160000,206168.6283,238744.9399,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Were dead elm trees to be replaced with resistant varieties, the value of these would increase some € 160,000, to ca. € 1.9 million.",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4565,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Ephestia,Ephestia kuehniella,,Flourmoth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,204000,20000,200000,262865.0011,304399.7984,204000,262865.0011,304399.7984,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of pheromone traps. Projections based upon information from exterminators, and data from the Federal Biological Research Centre (BBA- Berlin) on grain production. Note that the lower and upper limit numbers don't look right",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4566,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Ephestia,Ephestia kuehniella,,Flourmoth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1300000,1300000,2000000,1675120.105,1939802.637,1300000,1675120.105,1939802.637,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of pheromone traps. Projections based upon information from exterminators, and data from the Federal Biological Research Centre (BBA- Berlin) on grain production. Note that the lower and upper limit numbers don't look right",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4567,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Ephestia,Ephestia kuehniella,,Flourmoth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1800000,1800000,2300000,2319397.068,2685880.574,1800000,2319397.068,2685880.574,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of gas treatment. Projections based upon information from exterminators, and data from the Federal Biological Research Centre (BBA- Berlin) on grain production.",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4568,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Pyralidae,Ephestia,Ephestia kuehniella,,Flourmoth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12a,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,700000,700000,7000000,901987.7488,1044509.112,700000,901987.7488,1044509.112,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of insect traps in private households. Projections based upon information from exterminators, and data from the Federal Biological Research Centre (BBA- Berlin) on grain production",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4569,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1050000,309000,1960000,1352981.623,1566763.668,1050000,1352981.623,1566763.668,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Dermatology clinics were queried (not reported how many). ""... calculations are based upon average values. However, published estimates would seem to corroborate these casualty estimates (25 cases/100,000 inhabitants) (Schempp, D. (2002). Uniklinik Berlin. Personal communication.)",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4570,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12a,N,Europe,Germany,,Darmstadt,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,40400,,,52057.57865,60283.09733,40400,52057.57865,60283.09733,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Within the Darmstadt regional jurisdiction (ONB South Hesse), protection of existing conservation areas from hogweed infestation resulted in a total of € 40,400 in expenditures for calender year 2001 (Kuprian, M. (2002)., Mulf Wiesbaden. Personal communication). Data are for the Distric (spatial scale)",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4571,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,1170000,1170000,,1507608.094,1745822.373,1170000,1507608.094,1745822.373,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolation of the costs observed in conservation areas within one regional jurisdiction in 2001 (Kuprian, M. (2002)., Mulf Wiesbaden. Personal communication).",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4572,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12,N,Europe,Germany,,Hesse,Site,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,195000,,,251268.0157,290970.3955,195000,251268.0157,290970.3955,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Expenditures to control hagweed on roadways in Hesse,Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4574,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12a,N,Europe,Germany,,"Cologne, Frankfurt, Darmstadt, Munich, and Berlin",Site,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,19,,,24.48252461,28.35096162,19,24.48252461,28.35096162,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Average expenditures to control hagweed in 5 cities (Cologne, Frankfurt, Darmstadt, Munich, and Berlin). ",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4575,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12a,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,2100000,1200000,3700000,2705963.247,3133527.337,2100000,2705963.247,3133527.337,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Extrapolation (based on % built-up areas in Germany) of the expenditures to control hagweed in 5 cities,Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4576,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,One-time,53000,,,68293.35813,79084.26135,53000,68293.35813,79084.26135,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Data from German Railway,Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE4578,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,Giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12,N,Europe,Germany,,Mainz-Bingen District,Site,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,One-time,71000,42000,100000,91487.32881,105943.0671,71000,91487.32881,105943.0671,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"260,000 m2 are overgrown by hogweed. ""Eradication efforts, which according to Bitz, were very successful, cost from € 42,000 to € 100,000 annually (Bitz, A. (2002). Gesellschaft Mensch und Natur, Mainz. Personal Communication; Bitz, 2002; Krings (2002). Untere Naturschutzbehörde Landkreis Mainz-Bingen. Personal communication).e"" ""… in these cost statements, only the net labor costs are included, and not preparation or disposal costs."" Data are for the Distric (spatial scale)",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4586,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,"Monreal, F. (1998) Arbeitsweisen der Gewasserunterhaltung. Geographisches Institut der Universität Bonn",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,NA,NA,11,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,1996-1997,Period,1996,1997,1996,1997,One-time,225600000,,,290697765.9,336630365.3,112800000,145348883,168315182.7,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Nationwide expenditures for maintenance of waterways averaged € 225.6 million, for the years 1996 and 1997 (Monreal, 1998).",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4587,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,"Monreal, F. (1998) Arbeitsweisen der Gewasserunterhaltung. Geographisches Institut der Universität Bonn",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,NA,NA,11,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,2300000,2000000,2500000,2963674.032,3431958.512,2300000,2963674.032,3431958.512,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,617 (NE4587/NE4588/NE4589/685),no,"...according to Karreis (2002. Wasserneubauamt, Aschaffenburg. Personal communication), about 1 % of maintenance costs can be attributed to muskrat. This translates into an annual increased expenditure of € 2.3 million.",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4588,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,"Monreal, F. (1998) Arbeitsweisen der Gewasserunterhaltung. Geographisches Institut der Universität Bonn",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,NA,NA,11,N,Europe,Germany,,Unspecified,Unit (Three commercial fish hatcheries),Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,15000,,,19328.3089,22382.33812,15000,19328.3089,22382.33812,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,617 (NE4587/NE4588/NE4589/685),no,"For the three businesses that provided data on damage to ponds and dams, the average added expense came to € 15,000 annually. ",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4589,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,NA,NA,11,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1600000,1000000,2700000,2061686.283,2387449.399,1600000,2061686.283,2387449.399,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,617 (NE4587/NE4588/NE4589/685),no,"For the three businesses that provided data on damage to ponds and dams, the average added expense came to € 15,000 annually. These businesses among them possess 1.68 % of the total space devoted to carp production in Germany. Extrapolating to the total carp production yields annual costs of € 2.9 million. Acquisition costs of € 250,000 for muskrat traps were factored in. Given that these traps have a useful life of approximately five years, this predicts costs of € 50,000 per year for traps. Because, according to a decidedly unrepresentative sampling, approximately 60 % of these businesses were affected, this adds an additional € 1.6 million annually.",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4590,GS,GER1,Economic Impact of the Spread of Alien Species in Germany (R+D Project 201 86 211 (UFOPLAN)),Reinhardt et al,"In dem Entwurf einer European Strategy on Invasive Alien Species T-PVS (2002) 8 werden verstärkte Forschungsaktivitäten der Mitgliedstaaten angeregt, die nicht nur auf
den biologischen Bereich oder Bekämpfung invasiver Arten beschränkt bleiben, sondern auch die Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf Gesundheitswesen und
Volkswirtschaft untersuchen sollen. Derartige Studien wurden bisher nur für die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika oder mit eher regionalen Charakter durchgeführt. Aus
diesem Grunde wurden 20 Tiere und Pflanzen aus verschiedenen Problemgebieten (Gesundheitsgefährdende Arten, Schäden in Forst-, Land-, und Fischereiwirtschaft, im
kommunalen Bereich, an aquatischen und terrestrischen Verkehrswegen sowie Kosten von Arten, die einheimische Spezies gefährden oder in der Empfehlung 77 der Berner
Konvention aufgeführt sind) ausgewählt und beispielhaft für das Gebiet Deutschlands bearbeitet. Die entstehenden Kosten wurden in drei Kategorien aufgeschlüsselt: a)
direkte ökonomische Schäden, beispielsweise durch Vorratsschädlinge, b) ökologische Schäden, verursacht durch Pflege und Schutz gefährdeter heimischer Arten, Biozönosen
oder Ökosysteme und c) Kosten für Maßnahmen zur Bekämpfung invasiver Arten. Es zeigte sich, dass auf Grund der Datenlage sowie der unterschiedlichen Biologie und
Ökologie der invasiven Arten jeweils individuelle Ansätze notwendig waren. Die hier ermittelten Kosten unterscheiden sich stark von Art zu Art. Nicht alle untersuchten
Arten verursachen ökonomische Schäden. Eine differenzierte Betrachtung von Neobiota ist nach dem Prinzip der Einzelfallbewertung erforderlich. Die Monetisierung von
ökologischen Schäden gelang hierbei nur in wenigen Fällen. Weitergehende, mehrjährige Studien sollten willingness to pay-Analysen einbeziehen, um offen gebliebene Fragen zu beantworten.",2003,German,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,NA,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,Germany,Country,Unspecified,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,47000,8600,85800,60562.03456,70131.3261,47000,60562.03456,70131.3261,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost of traps. ""In addition, at 10 traps per trapper, at least € 240,000 needs to be included for provision of muskrat traps. This comes to annual expenditures of € 47,000 (see above).""",Phillip Haubrock/Marina Golivets,Yes
NE4593,GS,GER3,"Die Bekämpfung des Kartoffelkäfers im ökologischen Landbau. Amt für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten Bamberg",ALF,"Zur Bekämpfung des Kartoffelkäfers sind an vorbeugende Maßnahmen dieWahlfrühreifer Sorten und Maßnahmenfüreinschnelles Auflaufen, sowieinGebietenmit wenig oder sonst keinem Kartoffelbaudie Lage der Kartoffelflächen zu nennen. Es sollten alle Kartoffelflächenmöglichst weit von den Flächen des Vorjahresentfernt , zusammengelegt werden. jedochist damit kein Freisein vonKäfern gewährleistet. Durch heißte und trockene Sommer bedingt, könnensich neuerdnigs 2 bis sogar 3 Generatonen je Jahr entwiceln, entgegen der früher üblichen einen Generation. ",2008,German,Report,"Arndt, E. (2009). Neobiota in Sachsen-Anhalt. Landesamt für Umweltschutz Sachsen-Anhalt.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Leptinotarsa,Leptinotarsa decemlineata,,Kartoffelkäfer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,12b,N,Europe,Germany,,Sachsonia,Unit (1 ha),2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,89,,,149.0250978,123.5073384,89,149.0250978,123.5073384,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control of potatopugs using pesticides,Phillip Haubrock,Yes
NE4603,Go,UKR_11,"Ecological passport of Lviv region, 2017",Lviv Regional State Administration,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Lviv region,Site,Unspecified,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,217700,,,10306.49274,38673.35867,217700,10306.49274,38673.35867,UAH,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from the local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4604,Go,UKR_10,"Ecological passport of Lviv region, 2016",Lviv Regional State Administration,NA,2016,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Lviv region,Site,Unspecified,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,99000,,,8623.603379,24195.18807,99000,8623.603379,24195.18807,UAH,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from the local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4605,Go,UKR_13,"Ecological passport of Khmelnytskyi region, 2017",Khmelnytskyi Regional State Administration,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Khmelnytskyi region,Site,Unspecified,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,320,,,42.12522707,90.4030466,320,42.12522707,90.4030466,UAH,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from the local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4608,Go,UKR_16,"Measures for eradication of Sosnovsky's hogweed, which were implemented in Volyn region in 2018",DEPARTMENT OF STATE FOOD AND CONSUMER SERVICE IN THE VOLYN REGION,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Tulychiv vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2000,,,71.77491869,214.4885217,2000,71.77491869,214.4885217,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from the local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4609,Go,UKR_17,"Measures for eradication of Sosnovsky's hogweed, which were implemented in Volyn region in 2019",DEPARTMENT OF STATE FOOD AND CONSUMER SERVICE IN THE VOLYN REGION,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kniahynynok vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,21882.8,,,785.3180954,2346.804711,21882.8,785.3180954,2346.804711,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from the local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4610,Go,UKR_18,Report on the implementation of the passport of the budget program of the local budget as of 01.01.2019,Kolomyia city council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kolomyia,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,25000,,,897.1864837,2681.106521,25000,897.1864837,2681.106521,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from the local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4611,Go,UKR_19,"Measures for eradication of Sosnovsky's hogweed, which were implemented in Volyn region in 2018 as of 10.08.2018",DEPARTMENT OF STATE FOOD AND CONSUMER SERVICE IN THE VOLYN REGION,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Zhydychyn territorial community,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,11000,,,394.7620528,1179.686869,11000,394.7620528,1179.686869,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from the local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4613,Go,UKR_20,Public procurement (UA-2019-11-13-000112-b): Mowing of Sosnowsky's hogweed,"Municipal enterprise ""Zelenosvit""",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowskyi's hogweed and other species,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kolomyia,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,10992,,,387.4534821,1157.846308,10992,387.4534821,1157.846308,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,800 m2 within city,Marina Golivets,No
NE4614,Go,UKR_21,Public procurement (UA-2017-05-15-001212-b): Elimination of Sosnowsky's hogweed,Onokivtsi village council,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Onokivtsi vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,119975,,,4510.91386,14850.93865,119975,4510.91386,14850.93865,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4622,Go,UKR_29,Public procurement (UA-2019-09-13-002330-b): Control of common ragweed in Shatsk village council,"Department of Housing and Communal Services, Architecture and Urban Planning of Shyshaky Settlement council",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Shyshaky vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,685000,,,24145.34527,72154.7235,685000,24145.34527,72154.7235,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4623,Go,UKR_3,Public procurements (UA-2019-07-08-001820-b and other): Mowing of Sosnowsky's hogweed in the city,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Khmelnytsky city council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Khmelnytskyi city,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,526160.23,,,18546.45317,55423.2787,526160.23,18546.45317,55423.2787,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Money allocated from local budget
",Marina Golivets,No
NE4624,Go,UKR_30,Public procurement (UA-2018-04-20-001235-a): Elimination of Sosnowsky's hogweed,Onokivtsi village council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Onokivtsi vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,170000,,,6100.868089,18231.52434,170000,6100.868089,18231.52434,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4625,Go,UKR_31,Public procurement (UA-2017-05-19-000539-c): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed thickets in Bolshiv vill.,Bovshiv village council,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Bovshiv vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,160000,,,6015.805107,19805.37765,160000,6015.805107,19805.37765,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,800 m2 within a village,Marina Golivets,No
NE4626,Go,UKR_32,Public procurement (UA-2017-08-07-000692-c): Elimination of Sosnowsky's hogweed in Dobrotvir vill.,Dobrotvir village council,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Dobrotvir vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,120000,,,4511.85383,14854.03324,120000,4511.85383,14854.03324,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4627,Go,UKR_33,Public procurement (UA-2017-05-16-000153-b): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed in Chernivtsi city,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Chernivtsi city council,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Chernivtsi,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,199889,,,7515.582919,24742.98209,199889,7515.582919,24742.98209,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,85 ha within a city,Marina Golivets,No
NE4628,Go,UKR_34,Public procurement (UA-2019-05-29-001126-c): Elimination of Sosnowsky's hogweed in Dobrotvir vill.,Dobrotvir village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Dobrotvir vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,50000,,,1762.433962,5266.768139,50000,1762.433962,5266.768139,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4629,Go,UKR_35,Public procurement (UA-2018-04-10-000730-a): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed in Chernivtsi city,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Chernivtsi city council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Chernivtsi,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,199447,,,7157.646104,21389.54609,199447,7157.646104,21389.54609,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,85 ha within a city,Marina Golivets,No
NE4630,Go,UKR_36,Public procurement (UA-2016-10-13-000001-b): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed thickets in Bolshiv vill.,Bovshiv village council,NA,2016,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Bovshiv vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,91580,,,3660.503765,13870.32109,91580,3660.503765,13870.32109,UAH,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4631,Go,UKR_37,Public procurement (UA-2019-06-24-000202-b): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed in Dubno city,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Dubno city council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Dubno,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,70000,,,2467.407546,7373.475394,70000,2467.407546,7373.475394,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4632,Go,UKR_38,Public procurement (UA-2019-06-25-002505-c): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed in Chernivtsi city,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Chernivtsi city council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Chernivtsi,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,199900,,,7046.210978,21056.53902,199900,7046.210978,21056.53902,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4633,Go,UKR_39,Public procurement (UA-2019-06-13-003019-b): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed thickets in Bolshiv vill.,Bovshiv village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Bovshiv vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,199104,,,7018.15303,20972.69207,199104,7018.15303,20972.69207,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4635,Go,UKR_40,Public procurement (UA-2019-05-20-000476-c): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed thickets,"Department of Housing, Utilities and Ecology of Ternopil city council",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Ternopil,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,146327.99,,,5157.868382,15413.51191,146327.99,5157.868382,15413.51191,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4636,Go,UKR_41,Public procurement (UA-2018-05-15-000590-c): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed thickets,"Department of Housing, Utilities and Ecology of Ternopil city council",NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Ternopil,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,194941.2,,,6995.94439,20906.3249,194941.2,6995.94439,20906.3249,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4637,Go,UKR_42,Public procurement (UA-2017-05-19-000196-a): Mowing of Sosnovwsky's hogweed in the city,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Khmelnytsky city council,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Khmelnytskyi,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,56757.11,,,2133.998201,7025.599988,56757.11,2133.998201,7025.599988,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4639,Go,UKR_44,Public procurement (UA-2017-05-03-000143-a): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed thickets,"Department of Housing, Utilities and Ecology of Ternopil city council",NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Ternopil,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,194963.24,,,7330.380343,24133.25373,194963.24,7330.380343,24133.25373,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4640,Go,UKR_45,Public procurement (UA-2018-05-10-000889-c): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed thickets in Bolshiv vill.,Bovshiv village council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Bovshiv vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,101000,,,3624.633394,10831.67034,101000,3624.633394,10831.67034,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4641,Go,UKR_46,Public procurement (UA-2019-05-11-001155-a and other): Removal of Sosnowsky's hogweed in Onokivtsi vill.,Onokivtsi village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Onokivtsi vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,150000,,,5287.301885,15800.30442,150000,5287.301885,15800.30442,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4642,Go,UKR_47,Public procurement (UA-2018-12-21-000887-a): Monitoring of common ragweed areas in Chernivtsi city,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Chernivtsi city council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Chernivtsi,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,50000,,,1794.372967,5362.213042,50000,1794.372967,5362.213042,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4644,Go,UKR_49,Public procurement (UA-2018-04-19-000065-a): Spraying of common ragweed in Velyka Olesksandrivka vill.,Velyka Oleksandrivka village council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Velyka Oleksandrivka vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,197763.43,,,7097.227055,21208.99287,197763.43,7097.227055,21208.99287,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4646,Go,UKR_50,Public procurement (UA-2019-09-06-000522-b and other): Removal of common ragweed in Hannivka vill.,Hannivka village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Hannivka vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,133846.76,,,4717.921509,14098.79702,133846.76,4717.921509,14098.79702,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,222 m2 within village,Marina Golivets,No
NE4647,Go,UKR_51,"Public procurement (UA-2017-01-03-000125-a): Calculation of the costs of carrying out measures for localization and elimination of common ragweed by mechanical, chemical and agrotechnical methods in the territory and in the conditions of the Kirovograd region",The Main Department of the State Consumer Service in Kirovohrad (Kropyvnytskyi) Region,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kropyvnytskyi region,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,49000,,,1842.340314,6065.396907,49000,1842.340314,6065.396907,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4648,Go,UKR_52,"Public procurement (UA-2019-07-31-002286-b and other): Elimination of common ragweed (phytocoenotic, chemical method)",Regional administration of Zaporizhia city council in Khortytsia district,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Zaporizhia,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,760120.37,,,26793.2391,80067.55493,760120.37,26793.2391,80067.55493,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,1865 m2 (phytocoenotic method); 80000 m2 (herbicides),Marina Golivets,No
NE4649,Go,UKR_53,"public procurement (UA-2018-08-08-000548-b) Spraying of common ragweed in Buryn city, Sumy region",Buryn city council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Buryn,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,5000,,,179.4372967,536.2213042,5000,179.4372967,536.2213042,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of spraying,Marina Golivets,No
NE4650,Go,UKR_54,Public procurement (UA-2019-04-12-000870-c) Spraying of common ragweed and Chemicals to eliminate common ragweed,"Poltavateploenergo Enterprise; Municipal Enterprise ""Dekoratyvni Kultury"" of Poltava city council",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Poltava,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,2836830.6,,,99994.53185,298818.5804,2836830.6,99994.53185,298818.5804,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4651,Go,UKR_55,"Public procurement (UA-2019-06-26-001077-c): Mowing of common ragweed in Fontanka vill., Odesa region",Fontanka village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Fontanka vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,99990,,,3524.515436,10532.48292,99990,3524.515436,10532.48292,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4652,Go,UKR_56,Public procurement (UA-2017-07-06-001415-b): Elimination of common ragweed (chemical method),Regional administration of Zaporizhia city council in Khortytsia district,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Zaporizhia,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,218019,,,8197.248835,26987.17894,218019,8197.248835,26987.17894,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4653,Go,UKR_57,"Public procurement (UA-2019-08-09-000272-a): Spraying (""Bishofitova Sil"") of common ragweed in Khlibodar vill.",Khlibodarske village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Khlibodarske vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,69900,,,2463.882678,7362.941858,69900,2463.882678,7362.941858,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4654,Go,UKR_58,"Public procurement (UA-2018-05-14-000468-a): Elimination of common ragweed (phytocoenotic, chemical method)",Regional administration of Zaporizhia city council in Khortytsia district,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Zaporizhia,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,330179.1,,,11849.28903,35409.81352,330179.1,11849.28903,35409.81352,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,40428 m2; 1276 m2,Marina Golivets,No
NE4655,Go,UKR_59,Public procurement (UA-2016-11-08-000753-c): Elimination of common ragweed in Komunarskyi district of Zaporizhia city using the phytocoenotic method,The district administration of the Zaporizhia city council on the Komunarskyi district,NA,2016,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Zaporizhia,Site,Unspecified,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,199595,,,7977.923663,30229.81806,199595,7977.923663,30229.81806,UAH,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4656,Go,UKR_6,Public procurement (UA-2017-12-14-001833-a): Mowing of hogweed in Domazhyr vill.,Domazhyr village council,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Domazhyr vill./ Lviv region,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,52125.26,,,1959.846283,6452.252873,52125.26,1959.846283,6452.252873,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4657,Go,UKR_60,Public procurement (UA-2019-07-25-000340-b): Spraying of common ragweed in Velyka Olesksandrivka village council,Velyka Oleksandrivka village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Velyka Oleksandrivka vill./ Mala Oleksandrivka vill./ Chubynske vill./ Bezuhlivka vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,186913.82,,,6588.465285,19688.63504,186913.82,6588.465285,19688.63504,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4658,Go,UKR_61,Public procurement (UA-2019-07-10-002841-b): Measures to prevent the introduction and spread of alien plant species that threaten natural ecosystems (common ragweed),Department of Agroindustrial Development of Lugansk Regional State Administration,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Luhansk region,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,9276240,,,326975.2082,977116.1056,9276240,326975.2082,977116.1056,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4659,Go,UKR_62,Public procurement (UA-2019-08-02-001016-b): Elimination of common ragweed,"Municipal Enterprise ""Management Of Housing And Communal Economy"" Irpin"" of Irpin city council",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Irpin,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,50000,,,1762.433962,5266.768139,50000,1762.433962,5266.768139,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4660,Go,UKR_63,Public procurement (UA-2019-08-23-000577-b and other): Measures to prevent the introduction and spread of alien plant species that threaten natural ecosystems (40000 m2 chemical treatment of ragweed); Monitoring and elimination of allergenic vegetation (ragweed) in the Korabelnyi district of Mykolaiv city,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Mykolaiv city council; Administration of Korabelnyi district of Mykolaiv city council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Mykolaiv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,156699.65,,,5523.455698,16506.01448,156699.65,5523.455698,16506.01448,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,40000 m2 within city; 45000 m2 within city,Marina Golivets,No
NE4661,Go,UKR_64,"Public procurement (UA-2019-08-13-000596-c and other): Preparation of project documentation for the object ""Repairing of lawns in the green zones of Slobozhanske village with the implementation of measures to prevent the introduction and spread of alien plant species (ragweed and other quarantine plants)",Komsomolska village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Slobozhanske vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,943405.2,,,33253.78728,99373.92899,943405.2,33253.78728,99373.92899,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of planning (i.e. administrative cost),Marina Golivets,No
NE4662,Go,UKR_65,Public procurement (UA-2019-08-13-000859-a and other): Measures to Prevent the Introduction and Proliferation of Alien Plants (Elimination of ragweed),Kreminna city council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kreminna,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,80249.5,,,2828.688884,8453.110195,80249.5,2828.688884,8453.110195,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4663,Go,UKR_66,"Public procurement (UA-2018-08-20-001384-c): Chemicals (""Stop Ambrosia"") for common ragweed elimination","Municipal Enterprise ""Zenele Budivnytsvo"" of Sumy city council",NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Sumy,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,72200.08,,,2591.077436,7743.044212,72200.08,2591.077436,7743.044212,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4664,Go,UKR_67,Public procurement (UA-2019-10-09-000446-c): Environmental security services through localization and elimination of ragweed and other quarantine organisms,Novooleksandrivka village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Novooleksandrivka vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,30000,,,1057.460377,3160.060883,30000,1057.460377,3160.060883,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4665,Go,UKR_68,public procurement (UA-2018-10-02-000517-c): Mowing of common ragweed in Vynohradiv city,Vynohradiv city council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Vynohradiv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,3138,,,112.6148474,336.5324905,3138,112.6148474,336.5324905,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of physical removal,Marina Golivets,No
NE4666,Go,UKR_69,Public procurement (UA-2018-08-29-000778-a): Control of quarantine objects (ragweed),Department of Housing and Communal Services of Slovyansk city council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Slovyansk,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,195000,,,6998.054573,20912.63086,195000,6998.054573,20912.63086,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4667,Go,UKR_7,Department of Ecology of the RSA initiates listing of Sosnowsky's hogweed in the list of quarantine weeds,Drohobych District State Administration,NA,2015,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Starosambir district,Site,Unspecified,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,99000,,,8623.603379,24195.18807,99000,8623.603379,24195.18807,UAH,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money allocated from local budget,Marina Golivets,No
NE4668,Go,UKR_70,Public procurement (UA-2018-06-04-000339-c): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,The Executive Committee Of Hlobyne city council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Hlobyne,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,18984,,,681.2875283,2035.925048,18984,681.2875283,2035.925048,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4669,Go,UKR_71,Public procurement (UA-2018-11-26-001734-b): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,"Municipal Enterprise ""SpetsEko""",NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Horishni Plavni,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,199999.25,,,7177.464954,21448.77173,199999.25,7177.464954,21448.77173,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4670,Go,UKR_72,"Public procurement (UA-2016-06-01-000025-a): Spraying of common ragweed in the territory of the Bortnitskaya aeration station of the Department of operation of sewage facilities of PJSC ""AK"" Kyivodokanal"" (40000 m2)",Kyivvodokanal,NA,2016,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kyiv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,49205.03,,,1966.75254,7452.386606,49205.03,1966.75254,7452.386606,UAH,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Chemical cotrol (cost of spraying); 40000 m2 within city,Marina Golivets,No
NE4671,Go,UKR_73,Public procurement (UA-2019-07-10-000163-c): Planting perrenial grasses to control common ragweed,Department of Urban Infrastructure Development,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kryvyi Rih,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,189993.16,,,6818.371806,20375.67601,189993.16,6818.371806,20375.67601,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4672,Go,UKR_74,Public procurement (UA-2018-10-04-000459-a): Mowing of common ragweed in Khodosivka vill.,Khodosivka village council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Khodosivka vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,59998.59,,,2153.19696,6434.504435,59998.59,2153.19696,6434.504435,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Physical removal,Marina Golivets,No
NE4673,Go,UKR_75,"Public procurement (UA-2018-07-18-000377-c): Chemicals (""Stop Ambrosia"") for common ragweed elimination","Municipal Enterprise ""Miskzelentrest""",NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Odesa,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,21000,,,753.6366463,2252.129477,21000,753.6366463,2252.129477,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4674,Go,UKR_76,Public procurement (UA-2016-09-20-000361-a): Elimination of the hotspots of common ragweed,Department of Housing and Communal Services and Construction of Nizhyn city council,NA,2016,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Nizhyn,Site,Unspecified,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,64798,,,2590.012262,9814.032169,64798,2590.012262,9814.032169,UAH,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,93100 m2 within city,Marina Golivets,No
NE4675,Go,UKR_77,Public procurement (UA-2018-08-31-000297-b): Monitoring and elimination of common ragweed in Korabelnyi district of Mykolaiv city,Administration of Korabelnyi district of Mykolaiv city council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Mykolaiv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,188700,,,6771.963579,20236.99202,188700,6771.963579,20236.99202,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,133000 m2 within city,Marina Golivets,No
NE4676,Go,UKR_78,Public procurement (UA-2017-05-25-000210-a): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,"Municipal Enterprise ""Tekhkomunbud""",NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Shyshaky vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,153516,,,5772.014605,19002.76472,153516,5772.014605,19002.76472,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Chemical cotrol (cost of spraying),Marina Golivets,No
NE4677,Go,UKR_79,"Public procurement (UA-2019-05-30-001012-b): Spraying of common ragweed in the territory of the Bortnitskaya aeration station of the Department of operation of sewage facilities of PJSC ""AK"" Kyivodokanal"" (33 000 m2)",Kyivvodokanal,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kyiv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,53622.82,,,1890.133582,5648.379198,53622.82,1890.133582,5648.379198,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Chemical cotrol (cost of spraying); 33000 m2 within city,Marina Golivets,No
NE4678,Go,UKR_8,Information on the status of implementation of the Program of maintenance and development of housing and communal services and improvement of Khmelnytsky for 2017-2020 for 2018,Department of Housing and Communal Services of Khmelnytsky city council,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Khmelnytskyi,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,261000,,,9366.62689,27990.75208,261000,9366.62689,27990.75208,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money spent for eradication; this includes 50633.04 UAH for 1-time service (delivered between 17 October  – 31 October),Marina Golivets,No
NE4679,Go,UKR_80,Public procurement (UA-2017-05-13-000337-c): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,"Municipal Enterprise ""Blagoustrij mista Kharkiv""",NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kharkiv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,59700,,,2244.64728,7389.881537,59700,2244.64728,7389.881537,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4680,Go,UKR_81,Public procurement (UA-2017-01-27-002563-b): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,"Municipal Enterprise ""Kharkivzelenbud"" of Kharkiv city council",NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kharkiv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,597000,,,22446.4728,73898.81537,597000,22446.4728,73898.81537,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4681,Go,UKR_82,Public procurement (UA-2019-09-16-001553-a and other): Mowing of the hotspots of common ragweed,Department of Housing and Communal Services and Construction of Nizhyn city council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Nizhyn,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,85880.94,,,3027.189706,9046.29997,85880.94,3027.189706,9046.29997,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of physical removal,Marina Golivets,No
NE4682,Go,UKR_83,Public procurement (UA-2019-04-26-000088-c): Mowing of common ragweed in Khodosivka vill.,Khodosivka village council,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Khodosivka vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,189997.56,,,6697.163047,20013.46191,189997.56,6697.163047,20013.46191,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of physical removal,Marina Golivets,No
NE4683,Go,UKR_84,Public procurement (UA-2018-10-12-000531-b): Mowing of common ragweed in the streets of Boyarka city,Boyarka city council (Municipal Enterprise),NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Boyarka,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,4375,,,157.0076346,469.1936411,4375,157.0076346,469.1936411,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of physical removal,Marina Golivets,No
NE4684,Go,UKR_85,Public procurement (UA-2017-07-07-002073-b): Services of weeding common ragweed,Department of Infrastructure of Sumy city council,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Sumy,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,189995.36,,,7143.594106,23518.31161,189995.36,7143.594106,23518.31161,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of physical removal,Marina Golivets,No
NE4685,Go,UKR_86,Public procurement (UA-2018-07-26-000221-a and other): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,"Municipal Enterprise ""Misto""",NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kaniv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,18000,,,645.9742683,1930.396695,18000,645.9742683,1930.396695,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4686,Go,UKR_87,Public procurement (UA-2016-09-23-000212-c): Mechenical mowing of common ragweed in Oleshky city,Executive Committee of Oleshky city council,NA,2016,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Oleshky,Site,Unspecified,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,120000.39,,,4796.482632,18174.75366,120000.39,4796.482632,18174.75366,UAH,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Physical removal,Marina Golivets,No
NE4687,Go,UKR_88,Public procurement (UA-2019-08-01-001559-b and other): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,"Municipal Enterprise ""Vodokanal""",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Zaporizhia,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,12600,,,444.1333583,1327.225571,12600,444.1333583,1327.225571,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4688,Go,UKR_89,Public procurement (UA-2018-07-05-001938-a): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,"Municipal Enterprise ""Horianyn"" of Hora village council",NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Hora vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,13200,,,473.7144634,1415.624243,13200,473.7144634,1415.624243,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4689,Go,UKR_9,PUBLIC REPORT OF THE HEAD OF VOLODYMYR-VOLYNSKYI REGIONAL STATE ADMINISTRATION FOR 2017,VOLODYMYR-VOLYNSKYI REGIONAL STATE ADMINISTRATION,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Volodymyr-Volynskyi district,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,7079,,,266.1617772,876.2641776,7079,266.1617772,876.2641776,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4690,Go,UKR_90,"Public procurement (UA-2017-06-02-001033-b): Research and justification of methods for combating ragweed and other quarantine plants, allergenic plants",Department of ecology of the executive committee of the Kryvyi Rih city council,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kryvyi Rih,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,180000,,,6767.780745,22281.04986,180000,6767.780745,22281.04986,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4691,Go,UKR_91,"Public procurement (UA-2019-09-13-002202-b): Chemicals (""Ambrostop"") for common ragweed elimination","Municipal Enterprise ""Horianyn"" of Hora village council",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Hora vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,7200,,,253.7904905,758.414612,7200,253.7904905,758.414612,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4692,Go,UKR_92,Public procurement (UA-2019-06-20-000243-c): Services to eliminate quarantine plants (ragweed),"Municipal Enterprise ""Molodizhne-2""",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Molodizhne vill.,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,128078.4,,,4514.594438,13491.18473,128078.4,4514.594438,13491.18473,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4693,Go,UKR_93,Public procurement (UA-2019-05-03-001097-a): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,"Municipal Enterprise ""Zatyshne Misto"" of Pavlograd city council",NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Pavlograd,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,74160,,,2614.042052,7811.670503,74160,2614.042052,7811.670503,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4694,Go,UKR_94,Public procurement (UA-2019-06-05-000916-b): Chemicals for common ragweed elimination,Municipal Enterprise for the maintenance of green spaces in the Dniprovskyi district of Kyiv,NA,2019,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Kyiv,Site,Unspecified,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,72000,,,2537.904905,7584.14612,72000,2537.904905,7584.14612,UAH,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of chemicals,Marina Golivets,No
NE4695,Go,UKR_95,Information on providing financial support for the development of agricultural enterprises at the expense of local budgets in the context of programs for the first quarter of 2018: Sosnowsky's Hagweed Control Program,Ministry of Agricultural Policy of Ukraine,NA,2018,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Volyn region,Site,Unspecified,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,18900,,,678.2729817,2026.91653,18900,678.2729817,2026.91653,UAH,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spent out of the planned 83,500 UAH",Marina Golivets,No
NE4696,Go,UKR_98,Structure of program expenditures of local budgets of mountain areas of Lviv region in 2017 - Turkiv district. In: STRATEGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOUNTAIN TERRITORIES OF THE LVIV REGION FOR 2018 - 2022,Lviv Regional State Administration,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Turkiv district,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,25000,,,939.9695479,3094.590258,25000,939.9695479,3094.590258,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4697,Go,UKR_99,Structure of program expenditures of local budgets of mountain areas of Lviv region in 2017 - Drohobych district. In: STRATEGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOUNTAIN TERRITORIES OF THE LVIV REGION FOR 2018 - 2022,Lviv Regional State Administration,NA,2017,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Sosnowsky's hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Drohobych district,Site,Unspecified,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,100000,,,3759.878192,12378.36103,100000,3759.878192,12378.36103,UAH,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,No
NE4698,Go,UKR_100,"Report on the Implementation of the Program for Combating Quarantine Objects (American white butterfly, ragweed) in the territory of Novoselytskyi District, Chernivtsi Region, 2007-2010",Novoselytsia District State Administration,NA,2008,Ukrainian,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,Novoselytsia district,Site,Unspecified,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,20000,,,4322.921584,9367.862547,20000,4322.921584,9367.862547,UAH,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Money spent for eradication,Marina Golivets,No
NE4729,Go,NL11,Technisch Vademecum: Beheer van Invasieve Uitheemse Planten,Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos,NA,2014,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Prunus,Prunus serotina,,Black cherry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Belgium,,Vlaanderen,Site,1994-2010,Period,1994,2010,1994,2010,One-time,4600000,,,6327512.991,5952029.638,270588.2353,372206.6465,350119.3905,EUR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Between 1994 and 2010, 4.6 million euros were spent on the eradication of Black cherry in 7.253 ha of forests and nature reserves in Flanders, Belgium.",Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
NE4735,Go,NL14,"Eindrapport van de Invexo-casus
„Grote waternavel en andere invasieve (water)planten?
Eindrapport van de Invexo-casus Grote waternavel en andere invasieve (water)planten
",INVEXO,NA,2013,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Balsaminaceae,Impatiens,Impatiens glandulifera,,Himalayan balsam,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,park with trees,3,N,Europe,Belgium,,Bellebeek and de Zwalm in Vlaanderen,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,65000,,,90834.77018,84838.10676,65000,90834.77018,84838.10676,EUR,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Yearly costs for eradication at two sites (of 6km and 9km) in the first year of eradication.,Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
NE4736,Gs,NL15,"Pallas’ eekhoorn
uitgeroeid in Dadizele
(West-Vlaanderen)",Adriaens et al ,"In 2005, bark stripping and cable gnawing were observed in a suburban park in western Flanders (northern Belgium). The damage was linked to the occurrence of Pallas’s squirrels (Callosciurus erythraeus), a tree squirrel native to Asia. The population most
probably originated from escaped animals of an abandoned zoo in the nearby amusement park. Pallas’s squirrel can reach high
densities and outcompete native red squirrels. To avoid further damage to ornamental trees in the Flanders park, the park manager
decided to start trapping. Low-tech mesh wire live traps were placed near the trunks of large trees, baited with peanuts, walnuts or hazelnuts. Traps were checked daily in order to minimize detention time and impact on bycatch. Digital photo traps were installed to check for remaining squirrels. During five successive capture campaigns, the number of animals removed increased to 248 in total, and by 2011, the last known animal was removed. Although the control started relatively quickly and the extent of the invasion was limited, the campaign still took over five years and required an investment of over € 200,000 including 18 months of post-eradication surveying.",2017,Dutch,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Pallas squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,park with trees,3,N,Europe,Belgium,,"Dadizele
(West-Vlaanderen)",Site,2005-2011,Period,2005,2011,2005,2011,One-time,200000,,,225936.2353,255965.5982,28571.42857,32276.60504,36566.51403,EUR,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Although the control started relatively quickly and the extent of the invasion was limited, the campaign still took over five years and required an investment of over € 200,000 including 18 months of post-eradication surveying. See also English publication: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10530-015-0898-z/tables/2 ",Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
NE4737,Gs,NL17,Beheer van de stierkikker in Vlaanderen en Nederland,Devisscher et al,NA,2012,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Belgium,,Vlaanderen,Site,2010-2012,Period,2010,2012,2010,2012,One-time,390500,,,535636.7544,507101.012,130166.6667,178545.5848,169033.6707,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,See Table 6 in report. Total expenditure in project. (the cost is for a region in Belgium),Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE4738,Gs,NL17,Beheer van de stierkikker in Vlaanderen en Nederland,Devisscher et al,NA,2012,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Belgium,,Vlaanderen,Site,2010-2012,Period,2010,2012,2010,2012,One-time,85000,,,116591.8672,110380.502,28333.33333,38863.95572,36793.50065,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,See Table 6 in report; Eradication at 6 sites. (the cost is for a region in Belgium),Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE4739,Gs,NL17,Beheer van de stierkikker in Vlaanderen en Nederland,Devisscher et al,NA,2012,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bullfrog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Netherlands,,Unspecified,Site,2011-2012,Period,2011,2012,2011,2012,One-time,50000,,,68583.45127,64750.84492,25000,34291.72564,32375.42246,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,See Table 6 in report,Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE4740,TC,NL18,Grootschalige eliminatie van watercrassula op Terschelling,van de Loo et al.,"The eradication of the aquatic invasive species Crassula helmsii fails mostly when the species is abundant, widespread and not isolated at the infested location or when re-contamination can easily occur. In 2018 an eradication of 4,5 ha has been attempted in three moist dune systems on the Wadden Island Terschelling, the Netherlands, in and near the protected habitats of the Natura-2000 area. A six step method has been carried out: 1. marking of the infestation, 2. the construction of a thoroughfare to and from the infected areas, 3. the excavation of the entire topsoil, 4. transport of extracted soils to the storage laid out in a dry dune system, 5. A check whether the excavation is clean and 6. replenishing the excavation with clean sand to create an additional security of C. helmsii removal and restoring the hydrology of the ecosystem. Aftercare consisted of increasing the resistance of the ecosystem against invasions of C. helmsii by manipulating succession and a monitoring program whereby the effectiveness of the measures was assessed every 6 weeks. Afterwards, the fast growing plant has not been observed for one year on site.",2020,Dutch,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Swamp Stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,moist dune systems on the Wadden Island Terschelling,5,Y,Europe,Netherlands,,Terschelling,Unit (4.5 ha),2016-2018,Period,2016,2018,2016,2018,Potentially ongoing,1400000,,,1585188.154,1683163.153,466666.6667,528396.0513,561054.3844,EUR,2020,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Multiple,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"In 2018 an eradication of 4,5 ha has been attempted in three moist dune systems on the Wadden Island Terschelling. Preparations started in 2016. Project is still ongoing and in total 4 million euros has been spent (personal communication with Janneke van der Loop).",Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
NE4741,Go,NL2,Risicoanalyse van de plaagmier Lasius neglectus ,van Loon,NA,2009,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Lasius,Lasius neglectus,,Ants,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,city of Leiden,12a,N,Europe,Netherlands,,Leiden,Site,25 years,Period,1985,2009,1985,2009,Potentially ongoing,15000,,,23904.16241,20206.17724,600,956.1664965,808.2470897,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Based on sales of pesticides from local store, costs of 25 years were extrapolated from sales in 2008 and 2009.",Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
NE4743,Go,NL4,Factsheet Muskusrat (Ondatra zibethicus),NA,NA,2018,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Cricetidae,Ondatra,Ondatra zibethicus,,Muskrat,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Netherlands,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,35000000,,,40347877.33,42841747.58,35000000,40347877.33,42841747.58,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Yearly costs of muskrat control are 35 million euros and shared among the regional water authorities. Estimate from government factsheet, and repeated often in other documentation.",Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE4744,Go,NL5,Landbouwschade door halsbandparkieten: Schade-inventarisatie en risicoschatting,Koen et al,NA,2014,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,Ring-necked parakeets,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,orchard with fruit trees,12b,N,Europe,Netherlands,,Unspecified,Country,Unspecified,Year,2011,2014,2011,2014,Potentially ongoing,300,100,500,412.6638907,384.0560269,300,412.6638907,384.0560269,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Based on answers to a survey (7 farmers),Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
NE4745,Go,NL7,"Gewasschade door nijlganzen, nu en in de toekomst: Een schatting op basis van voedselopname en schadecijfers ",Lensink,NA,2010,Dutch,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Alopochen,Alopochen aegyptiaca,,Egyptian goose,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,grasslands and crops,12b,N,Europe,Netherlands,,Unspecified,Country,2002-2009,Period,2002,2009,2002,2009,Potentially ongoing,400000,,,637444.331,538831.3931,50000,79680.54137,67353.92414,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Based on calculations taking into account the consumption rates and the value of grasslands and crops. Costs were extrapolated using species distribution maps. ,Laura Verbrugge/Phillip Haubrock/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne,Yes
NE4760,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29??????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????33??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2000.April-2001.March,Year,2000,2001,2000,2001,Potentially ongoing,45000000,,,594398.4043,414015.8348,45000000,594398.4043,414015.8348,JPY,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4761,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29??????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????32???????????????2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/?2?'?'?)?*?'?'?,?-?'?'?/?1?#?#?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2001.April-2002.March,Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,Potentially ongoing,86000000,,,979625.1192,795143.8135,86000000,979625.1192,795143.8135,JPY,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4762,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29??????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????31???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?)?""?""?)",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2002.April-2003.March,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,70000000,,,760762.6826,663474.5491,70000000,760762.6826,663474.5491,JPY,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4763,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29??????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????30???????????????2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2?
?
?)?*?
?
?,?-?
?
?/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?1?????,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2003.April-2004.March,Year,2003,2004,2003,2004,Potentially ongoing,163000000,,,1873429.415,1556760.66,163000000,1873429.415,1556760.66,JPY,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4764,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29??????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????29???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2004.April-2005.March,Year,2004,2005,2004,2005,Potentially ongoing,175000000,,,2099060.645,1690217.204,175000000,2099060.645,1690217.204,JPY,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4765,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29??????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????28???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?,??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2005.April-2006.March,Year,2005,2006,2005,2006,Potentially ongoing,183000000,,,2083972.71,1772970.12,183000000,2083972.71,1772970.12,JPY,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4766,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29??????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????27???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2006.April-2007.March,Year,2006,2007,2006,2007,Potentially ongoing,230000000,,,2404673.548,2245615.86,230000000,2404673.548,2245615.86,JPY,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4767,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????26???????????????2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/?2?'?'?)?*?'?'?,?-?'?'?/?1??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2007.April-2008.March,Year,2007,2008,2007,2008,Potentially ongoing,251000000,,,2519936.766,2464665.615,251000000,2519936.766,2464665.615,JPY,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4768,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????25???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2008.April-2009.March,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,Potentially ongoing,319000000,,,3513736.95,3108182.148,319000000,3513736.95,3108182.148,JPY,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4769,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????24???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?	?	?)?*?	?	?,?-?	?	?/?2?
?
?)?*?
?
?,?-?
?
?/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2009.April-2010.March,Year,2009,2010,2009,2010,Potentially ongoing,319000000,,,3895197.174,3165208.29,319000000,3895197.174,3165208.29,JPY,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4770,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????23???????????????-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/?2?'?'?)?*?'?'?,?-?'?'?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2010.April-2011.March,Year,2010,2011,2010,2011,Potentially ongoing,377000000,,,4827889.89,3795151.105,377000000,4827889.89,3795151.105,JPY,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4771,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????22??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2011.April-2012.March,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,338000000,,,4615178.837,3427724.476,338000000,4615178.837,3427724.476,JPY,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4772,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????21???????????????2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2?
?
?)?*?
?
?,?-?
?
?/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?1?????,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2012.April-2013.March,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,Potentially ongoing,433000000,,,5793681.082,4433325.433,433000000,5793681.082,4433325.433,JPY,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4773,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????20???????????????2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/?2?'?'?)?*?'?'?,?-?'?'?/?1?#?#?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2013.April-2014.March,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,439000000,,,4732995.723,4559799.061,439000000,4732995.723,4559799.061,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4774,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????19??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,461000000,,,4505414.541,4631882.981,461000000,4505414.541,4631882.981,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4775,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????18???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,435000000,,,3716587.919,4348689.207,435000000,3716587.919,4348689.207,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4776,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????17???????????????-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/?2?'?'?)?*?'?'?,?-?'?'?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,428000000,,,4017880.492,4258548.082,428000000,4017880.492,4258548.082,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4777,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????16???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,417000000,,,3717699.441,4069469.216,417000000,3717699.441,4069469.216,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4778,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????15??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2000.April-2001.March,Year,2000,2001,2000,2001,Potentially ongoing,36000000,,,475518.7234,331212.6679,36000000,475518.7234,331212.6679,JPY,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4779,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????14???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?	?	?)?*?	?	?,?-?	?	?/?2?
?
?)?*?
?
?,?-?
?
?/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2001.April-2002.March,Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,Potentially ongoing,36000000,,,410075.6313,332850.8987,36000000,410075.6313,332850.8987,JPY,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4780,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????13???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2002.April-2003.March,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,78000000,,,847706.9892,739300.2118,78000000,847706.9892,739300.2118,JPY,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4781,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????12???????????????-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*?""?""?,?-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2003.April-2004.March,Year,2003,2004,2003,2004,Potentially ongoing,79000000,,,907981.1275,754503.6329,79000000,907981.1275,754503.6329,JPY,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4782,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????11??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2004.April-2005.March,Year,2004,2005,2004,2005,Potentially ongoing,129000000,,,1547307.561,1245931.539,129000000,1547307.561,1245931.539,JPY,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4783,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????10???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2005.April-2006.March,Year,2005,2006,2005,2006,Potentially ongoing,155000000,,,1765113.497,1501696.004,155000000,1765113.497,1501696.004,JPY,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4784,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
9???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2006.April-2007.March,Year,2006,2007,2006,2007,Potentially ongoing,164000000,,,1714636.791,1601221.744,164000000,1714636.791,1601221.744,JPY,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4785,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
8???????????????-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/?2?'?'?)?*?'?'?,?-?'?'?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2007.April-2008.March,Year,2007,2008,2007,2008,Potentially ongoing,211000000,,,2118353.218,2071890.218,211000000,2118353.218,2071890.218,JPY,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4786,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
7???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2008.April-2009.March,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,Potentially ongoing,196000000,,,2158910.477,1909729.47,196000000,2158910.477,1909729.47,JPY,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4787,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
6???????????????2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2?
?
?)?*?
?
?,?-?
?
?/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?1?????,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2009.April-2010.March,Year,2009,2010,2009,2010,Potentially ongoing,279000000,,,3406771.196,2768316.968,279000000,3406771.196,2768316.968,JPY,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4788,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
5???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2010.April-2011.March,Year,2010,2011,2010,2011,Potentially ongoing,352000000,,,4507738.04,3543483.26,352000000,4507738.04,3543483.26,JPY,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4789,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
4???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2011.April-2012.March,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,383000000,,,5229625.724,3884078.326,383000000,5229625.724,3884078.326,JPY,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4790,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
3???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2012.April-2013.March,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,Potentially ongoing,333000000,,,4455648.499,3409462.746,333000000,4455648.499,3409462.746,JPY,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4791,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
2???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2013.April-2014.March,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,339000000,,,3654864.579,3521120.459,339000000,3654864.579,3521120.459,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4792,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
1???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,334000000,,,3264226.587,3355854.481,334000000,3264226.587,3355854.481,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4793,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
0???????????????-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*?""?""?,?-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,344000000,,,2939094.814,3438963.419,344000000,2939094.814,3438963.419,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4794,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
1???????????????-?""?""?/?2?#?#?)?*?#?#?,?-?#?#?/?2?$?$?)?*?$?$?,?-?$?$?/?2?%?%?)?*?%?%?,?-?%?%?/?2?&?&?)?*?&?&?,?-?&?&?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,336000000,,,3154223.938,3343159.242,336000000,3154223.938,3343159.242,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4795,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
2??????????????????????55??????????1????????2??????????48??????????3????????6????????9??????????1?3?????????12?????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,327000000,,,2915318.267,3191166.508,327000000,2915318.267,3191166.508,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4796,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
3??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2000.April-2001.March,Year,2000,2001,2000,2001,Potentially ongoing,85000000,,,1122752.541,782029.9102,85000000,1122752.541,782029.9102,JPY,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4797,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
4???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*?""?""?,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2001.April-2002.March,Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,Potentially ongoing,71000000,,,808760.2728,656455.9391,71000000,808760.2728,656455.9391,JPY,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4798,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
5??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2002.April-2003.March,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,76000000,,,825970.9125,720343.7961,76000000,825970.9125,720343.7961,JPY,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4799,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
6???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*?""?""?,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2003.April-2004.March,Year,2003,2004,2003,2004,Potentially ongoing,90000000,,,1034408.879,859561.1008,90000000,1034408.879,859561.1008,JPY,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4800,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
7???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?)??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2004.April-2005.March,Year,2004,2005,2004,2005,Potentially ongoing,97000000,,,1163479.329,936863.2502,97000000,1163479.329,936863.2502,JPY,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4801,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
8???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?)??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2005.April-2006.March,Year,2005,2006,2005,2006,Potentially ongoing,97000000,,,1104619.415,939771.0474,97000000,1104619.415,939771.0474,JPY,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4802,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????
9??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2006.April-2007.March,Year,2006,2007,2006,2007,Potentially ongoing,111000000,,,1160516.364,1083753.741,111000000,1160516.364,1083753.741,JPY,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4803,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????10???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2007.April-2008.March,Year,2007,2008,2007,2008,Potentially ongoing,124000000,,,1244909,1217603.73,124000000,1244909,1217603.73,JPY,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4804,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????11???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2008.April-2009.March,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,Potentially ongoing,124000000,,,1365841.322,1208196.195,124000000,1365841.322,1208196.195,JPY,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4805,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????12??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2009.April-2010.March,Year,2009,2010,2009,2010,Potentially ongoing,113000000,,,1379803.388,1121217.983,113000000,1379803.388,1121217.983,JPY,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4806,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????13??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2010.April-2011.March,Year,2010,2011,2010,2011,Potentially ongoing,99000000,,,1267801.324,996604.6668,99000000,1267801.324,996604.6668,JPY,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4807,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????14??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2011.April-2012.March,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,112000000,,,1529290.029,1135814.027,112000000,1529290.029,1135814.027,JPY,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4808,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????15???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*?""?""?,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2012.April-2013.March,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,Potentially ongoing,99000000,,,1324652.257,1013624.06,99000000,1324652.257,1013624.06,JPY,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4809,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????16???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*?""?""?,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2013.April-2014.March,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,85000000,,,916411.4726,882876.8114,85000000,916411.4726,882876.8114,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4810,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????17???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*?""?""?,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,62000000,,,605934.2766,622943.0473,62000000,605934.2766,622943.0473,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4811,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????18???????????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????)?*?????,?-?????/?2? ? ?)?*? ? ?,?-? ? ?/?2?!?!?)?*?!?!?,?-?!?!?/?2?""?""?)?*?""?""?,",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,57000000,,,487001.1756,569828.241,57000000,487001.1756,569828.241,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4812,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????19??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,65000000,,,610192.1309,646742.1153,65000000,610192.1309,646742.1153,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4813,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????20??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,Coypu,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,58000000,,,517090.0901,566017.301,58000000,517090.0901,566017.301,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4814,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????21???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?/??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2000.April-2001.March,Year,2000,2001,2000,2001,Potentially ongoing,8000000,,,105670.8274,73602.81508,8000000,105670.8274,73602.81508,JPY,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4815,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????22??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2001.April-2002.March,Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,34172.96927,27737.57489,3000000,34172.96927,27737.57489,JPY,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4816,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????23???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?2??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2002.April-2003.March,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,10868.03832,9478.207844,1000000,10868.03832,9478.207844,JPY,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4817,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????24?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????#?#?/",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2003.April-2004.March,Year,2003,2004,2003,2004,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,11493.43199,9550.678898,1000000,11493.43199,9550.678898,JPY,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4818,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????29???????????????*?6?6?,?-?6?6?/?2?7?7?)?*?7?7?,?-?7?7?/?2?8?8?)?*?8?8?,?-?8?8?/?2?9?9?)?*?9?9?,?-?9?9?/?2?9?9?/?2??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2008.April-2009.March,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,11014.84937,9743.517704,1000000,11014.84937,9743.517704,JPY,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4819,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????31???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?2??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2010.April-2011.March,Year,2010,2011,2010,2011,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,25612.14796,20133.42761,2000000,25612.14796,20133.42761,JPY,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4820,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????32???????????????2?6?6?)?*?6?6?,?-?6?6?/?2?7?7?)?*?7?7?,?-?7?7?/?2?8?8?)?*?8?8?,?-?8?8?/?2?9?9?)?*?9?9?,?-?9?9?/?2??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2011.April-2012.March,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,27308.75052,20282.39335,2000000,27308.75052,20282.39335,JPY,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4821,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????37???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?/??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4822,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4823,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2001.April-2002.March,Year,2001,2002,2001,2002,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,22781.97952,18491.71659,2000000,22781.97952,18491.71659,JPY,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4824,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2002.April-2003.March,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,10868.03832,9478.207844,1000000,10868.03832,9478.207844,JPY,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4825,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2003.April-2004.March,Year,2003,2004,2003,2004,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,11493.43199,9550.678898,1000000,11493.43199,9550.678898,JPY,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4826,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2005.April-2006.March,Year,2005,2006,2005,2006,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,22775.65803,19376.72263,2000000,22775.65803,19376.72263,JPY,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4827,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2006.April-2007.March,Year,2006,2007,2006,2007,Potentially ongoing,14000000,,,146371.4333,136689.6611,14000000,146371.4333,136689.6611,JPY,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4828,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2007.April-2008.March,Year,2007,2008,2007,2008,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,60237.53225,58916.30952,6000000,60237.53225,58916.30952,JPY,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4829,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2008.April-2009.March,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,66089.09624,58461.10622,6000000,66089.09624,58461.10622,JPY,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4830,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2009.April-2010.March,Year,2009,2010,2009,2010,Potentially ongoing,8000000,,,97685.19559,79378.26431,8000000,97685.19559,79378.26431,JPY,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4831,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2010.April-2011.March,Year,2010,2011,2010,2011,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,76836.44387,60400.28284,6000000,76836.44387,60400.28284,JPY,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4832,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2011.April-2012.March,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,9000000,,,122889.3773,91270.77006,9000000,122889.3773,91270.77006,JPY,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4833,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2012.April-2013.March,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,Potentially ongoing,7000000,,,93662.28077,71670.38806,7000000,93662.28077,71670.38806,JPY,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4834,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2013.April-2014.March,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,43125.24577,41547.14406,4000000,43125.24577,41547.14406,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4835,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,58638.80096,60284.81103,6000000,58638.80096,60284.81103,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4836,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,12000000,,,102526.5633,119963.8402,12000000,102526.5633,119963.8402,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4837,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,37550.28498,39799.51479,4000000,37550.28498,39799.51479,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4838,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????38???????????????2?.?.?)?*?.?.?,?-?.?.?/?2?/?/?)?*?/?/?,?-?/?/?/?2?0?0?)?*?0?0?,?-?0?0?/?2?1?1?)?*?1?1?,?-?1?1?/?0??????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17830.69276,19517.83797,2000000,17830.69276,19517.83797,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4839,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????44??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2005.April-2006.March,Year,2005,2006,2005,2006,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,11387.82902,9688.361314,1000000,11387.82902,9688.361314,JPY,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4840,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????45??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2006.April-2007.March,Year,2006,2007,2006,2007,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,10455.10238,9763.547218,1000000,10455.10238,9763.547218,JPY,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4841,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29???????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????46??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2007.April-2008.March,Year,2007,2008,2007,2008,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,10039.58871,9819.384921,1000000,10039.58871,9819.384921,JPY,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4842,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????47??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2008.April-2009.March,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,22029.69875,19487.03541,2000000,22029.69875,19487.03541,JPY,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4843,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????48??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2009.April-2010.March,Year,2009,2010,2009,2010,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,12210.64945,9922.283039,1000000,12210.64945,9922.283039,JPY,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4844,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????49??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2010.April-2011.March,Year,2010,2011,2010,2011,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,25612.14796,20133.42761,2000000,25612.14796,20133.42761,JPY,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4845,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????50??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2011.April-2012.March,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,13654.37526,10141.19667,1000000,13654.37526,10141.19667,JPY,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4846,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????51??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2012.April-2013.March,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,13380.32582,10238.62687,1000000,13380.32582,10238.62687,JPY,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4847,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????52??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2013.April-2014.March,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,43125.24577,41547.14406,4000000,43125.24577,41547.14406,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4848,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????53??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,48865.66747,50237.34253,5000000,48865.66747,50237.34253,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4849,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????54??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,42719.40136,49984.93342,5000000,42719.40136,49984.93342,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4850,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),"?????????29???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????
1????????29????????????????????164??????????8????????5??????????5?3?ha????????1?2?ha??????18?????????47?4?t???????1?3?t??????3?????????55??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,28162.71373,29849.63609,3000000,28162.71373,29849.63609,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4851,TC,JP_1,????????????????????????29????????????????????????????,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Cetartiodactyla,Cervidae,Muntiacus,Muntiacus reevesi,,Reeves's muntjac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17830.69276,19517.83797,2000000,17830.69276,19517.83797,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4852,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Pycnonotidae,Pycnonotus,Pycnonotus sinensis,,Light-vented Bulbul,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2013.April-2014.March,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,3294000,,,35513.63989,34214.07314,3294000,35513.63989,34214.07314,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4853,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Pycnonotidae,Pycnonotus,Pycnonotus sinensis,,Light-vented Bulbul,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,7774000,,,75976.33978,78109.02016,7774000,75976.33978,78109.02016,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4854,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Pycnonotidae,Pycnonotus,Pycnonotus sinensis,,Light-vented Bulbul,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,8229000,,,70307.59077,82265.20342,8229000,70307.59077,82265.20342,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4855,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Pycnonotidae,Pycnonotus,Pycnonotus sinensis,,Light-vented Bulbul,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,6992000,,,65637.89814,69569.55185,6992000,65637.89814,69569.55185,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4856,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Pycnonotidae,Pycnonotus,Pycnonotus sinensis,,Light-vented Bulbul,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,16192000,,,144357.2886,158016.4162,16192000,144357.2886,158016.4162,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4857,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Galliformes,Phasianidae,Phasianus,Phasianus colchicus,,Common pheasant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2013.April-2014.March,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,7218000,,,77819.50599,74971.82146,7218000,77819.50599,74971.82146,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4858,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Galliformes,Phasianidae,Phasianus,Phasianus colchicus,,Common pheasant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,2265000,,,22136.14736,22757.51616,2265000,22136.14736,22757.51616,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4859,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Galliformes,Phasianidae,Phasianus,Phasianus colchicus,,Common pheasant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,2167000,,,18514.58855,21663.47014,2167000,18514.58855,21663.47014,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4860,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Galliformes,Phasianidae,Phasianus,Phasianus colchicus,,Common pheasant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2749000,,,25806.43335,27352.21654,2749000,25806.43335,27352.21654,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4861,TC,JP_2,?????????????????????????????????,Okinawa Prefecture,NA,2018,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Galliformes,Phasianidae,Phasianus,Phasianus colchicus,,Common pheasant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1610000,,,14353.70767,15711.85956,1610000,14353.70767,15711.85956,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4862,TC,JP_3,??25??????????????????????????????????????? ,Ministry of Agriculture - Forestry and Fisheries (Japan),NA,2013,Japanese,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Delphacidae,Nilaparvata,Nilaparvata lugens,,brown planthopper,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Rice field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,10500000000,,,113203770.1,109061253.2,10500000000,113203770.1,109061253.2,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4867,TC,JP_5,??53?????????????????????,"????, ???, ???, ????, ???, ????, ????, ????",NA,1978,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Brachyceridae,Lissorhoptrus,Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus,,Rice water weevil,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Rice field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Aichi/ Mie/ Gifu/ Shizuoka,Site,1978,Year,1978,1978,1978,1978,Potentially ongoing,192143000,,,3430846.387,,192143000,3430846.387,,JPY,1978,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4868,TC,JP_6,????????????????????????????,???,NA,1993,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Bactrocera,Bactrocera cucurbitae,,Melon fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami Islands,Site,1979-1989,Period,1979,1989,1979,1989,One-time,3410000000,,,44733359.94,,310000000,4066669.085,,JPY,1980,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4869,TC,JP_6,????????????????????????????,???,NA,1993,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Bactrocera,Bactrocera cucurbitae,,Melon fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,1980-1993,Period,1980,1993,1980,1993,One-time,17000000000,,,223010885.3,,1214285714,15929348.95,,JPY,1980,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4870,TC,JP_6,????????????????????????????,???,NA,1993,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Bactrocera,Bactrocera dorsalis,,Oriental fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami Islands,Site,1968-1980,Period,1968,1980,1968,1980,One-time,950000000,,,12462373,,73076923.08,958644.0772,,JPY,1980,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4871,TC,JP_6,????????????????????????????,???,NA,1993,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Bactrocera,Bactrocera dorsalis,,Oriental fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa,Site,1977-1986,Period,1977,1986,1977,1986,One-time,2580000000,,,33845181.42,,258000000,3384518.142,,JPY,1980,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4872,TC,JP_6,????????????????????????????,???,NA,1993,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Tephritidae,Bactrocera,Bactrocera dorsalis,,Oriental fruit fly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Ogasawara Islands,Site,1975-1985,Period,1975,1985,1975,1985,One-time,1430000000,,,18759150.94,,130000000,1705377.358,,JPY,1980,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4873,TC,JP_7,????????????????????,????,NA,2016,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Brenthidae,Cylas,Cylas formicarius,,Sweet potato weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Kume Island,Site,1994-2012,Period,1994,2012,1994,2012,One-time,4500000000,,,60211466.21,46073820.89,236842105.3,3169024.537,2424937.942,JPY,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4874,GS,JP_8,??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,????,NA,2018,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Stylommatophora,Achatinidae,Achatina,Achatina fulica,,Giant African snail,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Ogasawara Islands,Site,1985,Year,1985,1985,1985,1985,Potentially ongoing,16998000,,,162384.4711,,16998000,162384.4711,,JPY,1985,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4875,GS,JP_8,??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,????,?????????????????????????????????????????2011???????????????? 1930????????????????????????????????????1980????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 1990??~2000????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1960????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,2018,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Stylommatophora,Achatinidae,Achatina,Achatina fulica,,Giant African snail,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Ogasawara Islands,Site,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,Potentially ongoing,12183000,,,163012.5095,124737.1911,12183000,163012.5095,124737.1911,JPY,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4876,GS,JP_9,????????? ???????,????,"When was the masked palm civet (Paguma larvata) introduced into Japan and how has its habitat been extended? These problems have so far been discussed but no definite conclusion has been reached yet.
The writer sent out questionaries to the game rangers in Shizuoka Prefecture asking them whether the animal lives or not in the area under their charge. Their answers seem to indicate that its habitat extends from four source areas. Therefore it is supposed that the civet was imported several times into several areas in the Prefecture from several places of origin.

???? (4)",1973,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Viverridae,Paguma,Paguma larvata,,Masked palm civet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Shizuoka Prefecture,Site,1965.Oct-1966.Aug,Year,1965,1966,1965,1966,Potentially ongoing,44836000,,,968895.4974,,44836000,968895.4974,,JPY,1965,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4877,GS,JP_10,???????????????????,????; ???; ???; ????; ????; ????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????20?????????????????????????????????30?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????21???????????????????????????200??????130??????????????????70???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????,2006,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,poultry farm,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawajima Island,Unit (Farmer),1999,Year,1998,1999,1998,1999,Potentially ongoing,7960000,211200,2916000,102832.782,72288.70399,7960000,102832.782,72288.70399,JPY,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4878,GS,JP_11,?????????????????????????????????????????????????,????; ????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2001 ? 8 ??? 2006 ? 7 ?? 5 ?????????????1 ??? 2 ???????????????????????? 3 ??????????5 ?????????? 3 ??????????????? 83.3%?84.3%?68.9%?18.6%???? 15.5%??????????????????????????????????? 3.9%?4.5%?16.2%?68.9%????78.1%????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2 ???????????????????????????????????,2008,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis macrochirus,,Bluegill,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,satellite lake Katata Naiko of Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Unit (7.1Ha),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,609,,,6.999500084,5.816363449,609,6.999500084,5.816363449,JPY,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4879,GS,JP_11,?????????????????????????????????????????????????,????; ????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2001 ? 8 ??? 2006 ? 7 ?? 5 ?????????????1 ??? 2 ???????????????????????? 3 ??????????5 ?????????? 3 ??????????????? 83.3%?84.3%?68.9%?18.6%???? 15.5%??????????????????????????????????? 3.9%?4.5%?16.2%?68.9%????78.1%????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2 ???????????????????????????????????,2008,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis macrochirus,,Bluegill,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,satellite lake Katata Naiko of Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Unit (7.1Ha),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,3070,,,34.96063508,29.74326923,3070,34.96063508,29.74326923,JPY,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4880,GS,JP_11,?????????????????????????????????????????????????,????; ????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2001 ? 8 ??? 2006 ? 7 ?? 5 ?????????????1 ??? 2 ???????????????????????? 3 ??????????5 ?????????? 3 ??????????????? 83.3%?84.3%?68.9%?18.6%???? 15.5%??????????????????????????????????? 3.9%?4.5%?16.2%?68.9%????78.1%????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2 ???????????????????????????????????,2008,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,satellite lake Katata Naiko of Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Unit (7.1Ha),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,2508,,,28.82552744,23.95310268,2508,28.82552744,23.95310268,JPY,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4881,GS,JP_11,?????????????????????????????????????????????????,????; ????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2001 ? 8 ??? 2006 ? 7 ?? 5 ?????????????1 ??? 2 ???????????????????????? 3 ??????????5 ?????????? 3 ??????????????? 83.3%?84.3%?68.9%?18.6%???? 15.5%??????????????????????????????????? 3.9%?4.5%?16.2%?68.9%????78.1%????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2 ???????????????????????????????????,2008,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,satellite lake Katata Naiko of Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Unit (7.1Ha),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,4678,,,53.27226414,45.32215422,4678,53.27226414,45.32215422,JPY,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4883,GS,JP_13,????????????????????????????????????????,????; ?????,"???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????CVM(?????)?????????????????????????????1??????????????????????(WTP)???2,969?????????????????????????(TWTP)?14?675.7??????2003?????????????????4?1798.1?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2004,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,Shiga Prefecture (Official Report),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Unit (Lake),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,417981000,,,4804036.198,3992002.316,417981000,4804036.198,3992002.316,JPY,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4884,GS,JP_14,??????????????????????,???,NA,1999,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,Hokkaido Prefecture (Official Report),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Ishikari and Sorachi in Hokkaido Prefecture,Site,1995.Apr-1996.Mar,Year,1995,1996,1995,1996,Potentially ongoing,126000,,,2154.805394,1161.205821,126000,2154.805394,1161.205821,JPY,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4885,GS,JP_14,??????????????????????,???,NA,1999,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,Hokkaido Prefecture (Official Report),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Ishikari and Sorachi in Hokkaido Prefecture,Site,1996.Apr-1997.Mar,Year,1996,1997,1996,1997,Potentially ongoing,6690000,,,96111.27004,61299.85533,6690000,96111.27004,61299.85533,JPY,1996,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4886,GS,JP_14,??????????????????????,???,NA,1999,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,Hokkaido Prefecture (Official Report),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Ishikari and Sorachi in Hokkaido Prefecture,Site,1997.Apr-1998.Mar,Year,1997,1998,1997,1998,Potentially ongoing,17420000,,,219863.661,157865.8649,17420000,219863.661,157865.8649,JPY,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4887,GS,JP_15,?????????????????????????????,????,"??????????????1960?????1970??????????????????.????????????????????????????????????????,?????????????????????????????.??????????????????????????????,???????????????????????.???????.?????????????????????????????????????9??????,?????12??????.??????????????????????????????????????????,??????????????????????????,?????????????????????????????????",2013,Japanese,Peer-reviewed article,Okinawa prefecture (2012) (Official Report),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Sugar cane field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Miyako Island,Site,2011.April-2012.March,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,9637000,,,131587.2144,97730.71234,9637000,131587.2144,97730.71234,JPY,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4888,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami-oshima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,170000000,,,1515608.885,1659016.227,170000000,1515608.885,1659016.227,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4889,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami-oshima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,166000000,,,1558336.827,1651679.864,166000000,1558336.827,1651679.864,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4890,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami-oshima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,164000000,,,1401196.365,1639505.816,164000000,1401196.365,1639505.816,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4891,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami-oshima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,160000000,,,1563701.359,1607594.961,160000000,1563701.359,1607594.961,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4892,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,114000000,,,1016349.487,1112516.764,114000000,1016349.487,1112516.764,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4893,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,111000000,,,1042020.408,1104436.535,111000000,1042020.408,1104436.535,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4894,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,110000000,,,939826.83,1099668.535,110000000,939826.83,1099668.535,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4895,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,106000000,,,1035952.15,1065031.662,106000000,1035952.15,1065031.662,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4896,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami-oshima Island,Unit (Private Forest),2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,31000000,,,302967.1383,311471.5237,31000000,302967.1383,311471.5237,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4897,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami-oshima Island,Unit (Private Forest),2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,31000000,,,264860.2885,309906.5872,31000000,264860.2885,309906.5872,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4898,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami-oshima Island,Unit (Private Forest),2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,31000000,,,291014.7086,308446.2396,31000000,291014.7086,308446.2396,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4899,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2006????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Evergreen broad-leaved forst,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Amami-oshima Island,Unit (Private Forest),2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,31000000,,,276375.7378,302526.4885,31000000,276375.7378,302526.4885,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4900,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2007????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????-?‡?‡?/?1?ˆ?ˆ?&?*?ˆ?ˆ?,?-?ˆ?ˆ?/?1?‰?‰?&?*?‰?‰?,?2?Š?Š?&?*?Š?Š?,?2?‹?‹?&?*?‹?‹?,?2?Œ?Œ?&?*?Œ?Œ?,?2?�?�?&?*?�?�?,?2?Ž?Ž?&?*?Ž?Ž?,?2?�?�?&?*?�?�?,?2?�?�?&?*?�?�?,?2?‘?‘?&?*?‘?‘?,?2?’?’?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Tsushima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,26000000,,,231799.0059,253731.8936,26000000,231799.0059,253731.8936,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4902,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????-?‡?‡?/?1?ˆ?ˆ?&?*?ˆ?ˆ?,?-?ˆ?ˆ?/?1?‰?‰?&?*?‰?‰?,?2?Š?Š?&?*?Š?Š?,?2?‹?‹?&?*?‹?‹?,?2?Œ?Œ?&?*?Œ?Œ?,?2?�?�?&?*?�?�?,?2?Ž?Ž?&?*?Ž?Ž?,?2?�?�?&?*?�?�?,?2?�?�?&?*?�?�?,?2?‘?‘?&?*?‘?‘?,?2?’?’?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Tsushima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,23000000,,,215914.1386,228847.21,23000000,215914.1386,228847.21,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4903,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2009????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,Water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,20000000,,,187751.4249,198997.5739,20000000,187751.4249,198997.5739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4904,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2010????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????„?„?????…?…?????†?†?????‡?‡?????ˆ?ˆ?????‰?‰?????Š?Š?????‹?‹?????Œ?Œ?????�?�?????Ž?Ž?????�?�?????�?�?????‘?‘?????’?’?????“?“?????”?”?????•?•?????–?–?????—?—?????˜?˜?????™?™?????™?™???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,Water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,16000000,,,136702.0844,159951.7869,16000000,136702.0844,159951.7869,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4905,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2010????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????„?„?????…?…?????†?†?????‡?‡?????ˆ?ˆ?????‰?‰?????Š?Š?????‹?‹?????Œ?Œ?????�?�?????Ž?Ž?????�?�?????�?�?????‘?‘?????’?’?????“?“?????”?”?????•?•?????–?–?????—?—?????˜?˜?????™?™?????™?™???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,Water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,15000000,,,146597.0024,150712.0276,15000000,146597.0024,150712.0276,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4906,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2011????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????‘???????‘?????????????????????????????????
???????????????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?$?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Primates,Cercopithecidae,Macaca,Macaca mulatta,,Rhesus macaque,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Chiba prefecture,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,12000000,,,102526.5633,119963.8402,12000000,102526.5633,119963.8402,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4907,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2011????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????‘???????‘?????????????????????????????????
???????????????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?$?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Primates,Cercopithecidae,Macaca,Macaca mulatta,,Rhesus macaque,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Chiba prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,12000000,,,117277.6019,120569.6221,12000000,117277.6019,120569.6221,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4908,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2012????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,9000000,,,84488.1412,89548.90828,9000000,84488.1412,89548.90828,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4909,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2013????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????—?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,7000000,,,65712.99871,69649.15088,7000000,65712.99871,69649.15088,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4910,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2014????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????—?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Primates,Cercopithecidae,Macaca,Macaca mulatta,,Rhesus macaque,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Chiba prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,56325.42746,59699.27218,6000000,56325.42746,59699.27218,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4911,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2015????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????ž?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Park/ road site vegetation,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,51263.28164,59981.9201,6000000,51263.28164,59981.9201,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4912,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2016????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????Ÿ?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Crustacea,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Shikaribetsu in Hokkaido prefecture,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,53492.07829,58553.5139,6000000,53492.07829,58553.5139,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4913,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Kyushu,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,53492.07829,58553.5139,6000000,53492.07829,58553.5139,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4914,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2018????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????r???f???h???H??????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Park/ road site vegetation,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,51263.28164,59981.9201,6000000,51263.28164,59981.9201,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4915,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Ikinoshima-Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,42719.40136,49984.93342,5000000,42719.40136,49984.93342,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4916,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2012????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,42719.40136,49984.93342,5000000,42719.40136,49984.93342,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4917,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Kyushu region,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,46937.85622,49749.39349,5000000,46937.85622,49749.39349,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4918,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2013????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????—?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,42719.40136,49984.93342,5000000,42719.40136,49984.93342,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4919,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Tsushima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,39092.53398,40189.87402,4000000,39092.53398,40189.87402,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4920,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,37550.28498,39799.51479,4000000,37550.28498,39799.51479,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4921,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ebrima?ic?????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Kameoka City in Kyoto prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,37550.28498,39799.51479,4000000,37550.28498,39799.51479,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4922,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ebrima?ic?????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Kameoka City in Kyoto prefecture,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,35661.38553,39035.67593,4000000,35661.38553,39035.67593,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4923,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ebrima?ic?????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Kameoka City in Kyoto prefecture,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,34175.52109,39987.94673,4000000,34175.52109,39987.94673,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4924,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2012????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,35661.38553,39035.67593,4000000,35661.38553,39035.67593,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4925,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Chugoku region,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,39092.53398,40189.87402,4000000,39092.53398,40189.87402,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4926,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ebrima?ic?????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Kameoka City in Kyoto prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,34175.52109,39987.94673,4000000,34175.52109,39987.94673,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4927,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2022????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Calibri?c???????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????w? ?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,29319.40048,30142.40552,3000000,29319.40048,30142.40552,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4928,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2023????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????°???????°?????????????????????????????????
???????????????	?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Amamidae,Diploderma,Diploderma swinhonis,,Taiwan japalure,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Miyazaki Prefecture,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,26746.03914,29276.75695,3000000,26746.03914,29276.75695,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4929,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2024????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????²???????¯?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus vulgaris,,Eurasian squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Sayama hill in Tokyo,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,29319.40048,30142.40552,3000000,29319.40048,30142.40552,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4930,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2025????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Nirmala UI????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei??????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Orthriophis,Orthriophis taeniurus,,Taiwan beauty snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawajima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,28162.71373,29849.63609,3000000,28162.71373,29849.63609,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Original name is a synonym (Elaphe taeniura friesei),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4931,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2026????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????*?¬?¬?,?-?¬?¬?/?2?­?­?&?*?­?­?,?2?®?®?&?*?®?®?,?-?®?®?/?2?¯?¯?&?*?¯?¯?,?-?¯?¯?/?2?°?°?&?*?°?°?,?-?°?°?/?2?±?±?&?*?±?±?,?-?±?±?/?2?²?²?&?*?²?²?,?-?²?²?/?2?³?³?&?*?³?³?,?2?´?´?&?*?´?´?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,28162.71373,29849.63609,3000000,28162.71373,29849.63609,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4932,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2016????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????Ÿ?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Crustacea,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Shikaribetsu in Hokkaido prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,28162.71373,29849.63609,3000000,28162.71373,29849.63609,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4933,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei??????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Amagasaki City in Hyougo Prefecture,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,26746.03914,29276.75695,3000000,26746.03914,29276.75695,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Information,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4934,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2013????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????—?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,29319.40048,30142.40552,3000000,29319.40048,30142.40552,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4935,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,25631.64082,29990.96005,3000000,25631.64082,29990.96005,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4936,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2024????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????²???????¯?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus vulgaris,,Eurasian squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Sayama hill in Tokyo,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,25631.64082,29990.96005,3000000,25631.64082,29990.96005,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4937,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,29319.40048,30142.40552,3000000,29319.40048,30142.40552,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4938,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2018????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????r???f???h???H??????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Park/ road site vegetation,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,26746.03914,29276.75695,3000000,26746.03914,29276.75695,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4939,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2025????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Nirmala UI????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei??????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Orthriophis,Orthriophis taeniurus,,Taiwan beauty snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawajima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,29319.40048,30142.40552,3000000,29319.40048,30142.40552,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Original name is a synonym (Elaphe taeniura friesei),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4940,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2026????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Calibri?c???????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic???????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Callosciurus,Callosciurus erythraeus,,Taiwan squirrels,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Kyushu region,Site,2014.april-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,29319.40048,30142.40552,3000000,29319.40048,30142.40552,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4941,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Kyushu,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,29319.40048,30142.40552,3000000,29319.40048,30142.40552,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4943,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Kanto Region,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,25631.64082,29990.96005,3000000,25631.64082,29990.96005,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4945,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2022????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Calibri?c???????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????w? ?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17087.76055,19993.97337,2000000,17087.76055,19993.97337,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4946,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2026????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????*?¬?¬?,?-?¬?¬?/?2?­?­?&?*?­?­?,?2?®?®?&?*?®?®?,?-?®?®?/?2?¯?¯?&?*?¯?¯?,?-?¯?¯?/?2?°?°?&?*?°?°?,?-?°?°?/?2?±?±?&?*?±?±?,?-?±?±?/?2?²?²?&?*?²?²?,?-?²?²?/?2?³?³?&?*?³?³?,?2?´?´?&?*?´?´?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,18775.14249,19899.75739,2000000,18775.14249,19899.75739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4947,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,18775.14249,19899.75739,2000000,18775.14249,19899.75739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4948,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2018????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????%?¿?¿?%?%?À?À?%?%?Á?Á?%?%?Â?Â?%?%?Ã?Ã?%?%?Ä?Ä?%?%?Å?Å?%?%?À?À?/?2?Á?Á?&?*?Á?Á?,?-?Á?Á?/?2?Â?Â?&?*?Â?Â?,?-?Â?Â?/?2?Ã?Ã?&?*?Ã?Ã?,?2?Ä?Ä?&?*?Ä?Ä?,?-?Ä?Ä?/?2?Å?Å?&?*?Å?Å?,?-?Å?Å?/?0???????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Chelidridae,Chelydra,Chelydra serpentina,,Snapping turtle,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Chubu region,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,18775.14249,19899.75739,2000000,18775.14249,19899.75739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4949,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Kanto Region,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,18775.14249,19899.75739,2000000,18775.14249,19899.75739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4950,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2024????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????²???????¯?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus vulgaris,,Eurasian squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Sayama hill in Tokyo,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,18775.14249,19899.75739,2000000,18775.14249,19899.75739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4951,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2025????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????i???s??? ???n???i??????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Apinae,Bombus,Bombus terrestris,,Buff-tailed bumblebee,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Alpine belt,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Mt. taisetsuzan in Hokkaido Prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,18775.14249,19899.75739,2000000,18775.14249,19899.75739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,yes,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4952,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2026????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Á???????Á?????????????????????????????????
???????????????,?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?'?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Mikania,Mikania micrantha,,Bitter vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural field,12b,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17830.69276,19517.83797,2000000,17830.69276,19517.83797,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4953,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17830.69276,19517.83797,2000000,17830.69276,19517.83797,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4954,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ebrima?ic?????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Reclaimed ground/ US base,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Urasoe City on OkinawajimaIsland,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,19546.26699,20094.93701,2000000,19546.26699,20094.93701,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4955,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2016????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????Ÿ?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Crustacea,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Shikaribetsu in Hokkaido prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,19546.26699,20094.93701,2000000,19546.26699,20094.93701,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4956,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2025????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Nirmala UI????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei??????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Orthriophis,Orthriophis taeniurus,,Taiwan beauty snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawajima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17087.76055,19993.97337,2000000,17087.76055,19993.97337,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Original name is a synonym (Elaphe taeniura friesei),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4957,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2024????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????²???????¯?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus vulgaris,,Eurasian squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Sayama hill in Tokyo,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17830.69276,19517.83797,2000000,17830.69276,19517.83797,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4958,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Kitakyusyu City in Kyushu region,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17830.69276,19517.83797,2000000,17830.69276,19517.83797,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4959,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ê???????Ë?????????????????????????????????
???????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Rudbeckia,Rudbeckia laciniata,,Golden Glow,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Marshland,10,Y,Asia,Japan,,Kushiro Marsh in Hokkaido Prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,19546.26699,20094.93701,2000000,19546.26699,20094.93701,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4960,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????u???l??? ???p??????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bull frog,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Kume Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4961,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2016????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????Ÿ?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Crustacea,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4962,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ebrima?ic?????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Reclaimed ground/ US base,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Urasoe City on OkinawajimaIsland,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4963,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Kanto Region,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4964,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4965,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2026????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????*?¬?¬?,?-?¬?¬?/?2?­?­?&?*?­?­?,?2?®?®?&?*?®?®?,?-?®?®?/?2?¯?¯?&?*?¯?¯?,?-?¯?¯?/?2?°?°?&?*?°?°?,?-?°?°?/?2?±?±?&?*?±?±?,?-?±?±?/?2?²?²?&?*?²?²?,?-?²?²?/?2?³?³?&?*?³?³?,?2?´?´?&?*?´?´?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4966,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????u???l??? ???p??????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Ranidae,Lithobates,Lithobates catesbeianus,,Bull frog,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Kume Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4967,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2025????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Nirmala UI????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei??????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Orthriophis,Orthriophis taeniurus,,Taiwan beauty snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawajima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Original name is a synonym (Elaphe taeniura friesei),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4969,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2022????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Calibri?c???????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????w? ?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Pond,11,Y,Asia,Japan,,Imuta pond in Kagoshima Prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4970,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4971,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2022????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Calibri?c???????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????w? ?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Pond,11,Y,Asia,Japan,,Imuta pond in Kagoshima Prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4972,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Okayama City in Okayama Prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4973,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2010????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????„?„?????…?…?????†?†?????‡?‡?????ˆ?ˆ?????‰?‰?????Š?Š?????‹?‹?????Œ?Œ?????�?�?????Ž?Ž?????�?�?????�?�?????‘?‘?????’?’?????“?“?????”?”?????•?•?????–?–?????—?—?????˜?˜?????™?™?????™?™???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,Water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4974,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4975,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2018????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????%?¿?¿?%?%?À?À?%?%?Á?Á?%?%?Â?Â?%?%?Ã?Ã?%?%?Ä?Ä?%?%?Å?Å?%?%?À?À?/?2?Á?Á?&?*?Á?Á?,?-?Á?Á?/?2?Â?Â?&?*?Â?Â?,?-?Â?Â?/?2?Ã?Ã?&?*?Ã?Ã?,?2?Ä?Ä?&?*?Ä?Ä?,?-?Ä?Ä?/?2?Å?Å?&?*?Å?Å?,?-?Å?Å?/?0???????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Chelidridae,Chelydra,Chelydra serpentina,,Snapping turtle,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4976,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4977,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2016????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????Ÿ?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Crustacea,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Touya in Hokkaido prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4979,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Gymnocoronis,Gymnocoronis spilanthoides,,Senegal tea plant,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Riparian,9,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4980,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????å?????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis macrochirus,,Bluegill,Aquatic,aquatic,N,pond,11,Y,Asia,Japan,,Izu-numa/ uchi-numa pond in Miyagi Prefecture ,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4981,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4982,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2025????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????i???s??? ???n???i??????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Apinae,Bombus,Bombus terrestris,,Buff-tailed bumblebee,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Alpine belt,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Mt. taisetsuzan in Hokkaido Prefecture,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,yes,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4983,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ebrima?ic?????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Reclaimed ground/ US base,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Urasoe City on OkinawajimaIsland,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4984,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Nichinan City in Miyazaki Prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4985,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,Y,Asia,Japan,,Toyooka City in Hyogo Prefecture or Kyoutango City in Kyoto prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4986,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2022????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Calibri?c???????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????w? ?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Pond,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Himi City in Toyama Prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4987,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????å?????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis macrochirus,,Bluegill,Aquatic,aquatic,N,pond,11,Y,Asia,Japan,,Izu-numa/ uchi-numa pond in Miyagi Prefecture ,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4988,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2016????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????Ÿ?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Crustacea,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4989,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4990,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????å?????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis macrochirus,,Bluegill,Aquatic,aquatic,N,pond,11,Y,Asia,Japan,,Izu-numa/ uchi-numa pond in Miyagi Prefecture ,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4991,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2018????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????r???f???h???H??????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Park/ road site vegetation,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4992,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2016????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????Ÿ?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Crustacea,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4993,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei??????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4994,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2026????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????*?¬?¬?,?-?¬?¬?/?2?­?­?&?*?­?­?,?2?®?®?&?*?®?®?,?-?®?®?/?2?¯?¯?&?*?¯?¯?,?-?¯?¯?/?2?°?°?&?*?°?°?,?-?°?°?/?2?±?±?&?*?±?±?,?-?±?±?/?2?²?²?&?*?²?²?,?-?²?²?/?2?³?³?&?*?³?³?,?2?´?´?&?*?´?´?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Small Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Okinawa-jima Island/ Amami-Oshima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original namein document is a synonym (Urva auropunctata),Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4995,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Gymnocoronis,Gymnocoronis spilanthoides,,Senegal tea plant,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Riparian,9,N,Asia,Japan,,Chubu region,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4996,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2022????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Calibri?c???????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????w? ?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Pond,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Himi City in Toyama Prefecture,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4997,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE4998,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????å?????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis macrochirus,,Bluegill,Aquatic,aquatic,N,pond,11,Y,Asia,Japan,,Izu-numa/ uchi-numa pond in Miyagi Prefecture ,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5000,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5001,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Okayama City in Okayama Prefecture,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5002,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2018????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????%?¿?¿?%?%?À?À?%?%?Á?Á?%?%?Â?Â?%?%?Ã?Ã?%?%?Ä?Ä?%?%?Å?Å?%?%?À?À?/?2?Á?Á?&?*?Á?Á?,?-?Á?Á?/?2?Â?Â?&?*?Â?Â?,?-?Â?Â?/?2?Ã?Ã?&?*?Ã?Ã?,?2?Ä?Ä?&?*?Ä?Ä?,?-?Ä?Ä?/?2?Å?Å?&?*?Å?Å?,?-?Å?Å?/?0???????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Chelidridae,Chelydra,Chelydra serpentina,,Snapping turtle,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5003,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Okayama City in Okayama Prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5004,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2022????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Calibri?c???????????????????????????????????????Malgun Gothic?????????????????????????w? ?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,Large mouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Lake Biwa in Shiga prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5005,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2010????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????„?„?????…?…?????†?†?????‡?‡?????ˆ?ˆ?????‰?‰?????Š?Š?????‹?‹?????Œ?Œ?????�?�?????Ž?Ž?????�?�?????�?�?????‘?‘?????’?’?????“?“?????”?”?????•?•?????–?–?????—?—?????˜?˜?????™?™?????™?™???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,Water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,lake,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5006,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5007,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5008,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,Y,Asia,Japan,,Toyooka City in Hyogo Prefecture or Kyoutango City in Kyoto prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5009,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Nichinan City in Miyazaki Prefecture,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5010,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5011,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2017????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?*?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Common racoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Kyoutango City in Kyoto prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5012,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5013,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,beach park,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Tokyo,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5014,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2021????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ebrima?ic?????????????????????????????????????????????hic???????????????????????????????????????Microsoft JhengHei??????????????????????",2020,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Coreopsis,Coreopsis lanceolata,,Lanceleaf tickseed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,grass land,4,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5015,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Ê???????Ë?????????????????????????????????
???????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Rudbeckia,Rudbeckia laciniata,,Golden Glow,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Marshland,10,Y,Asia,Japan,,Kushiro Marsh in Hokkaido Prefecture,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5016,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2016????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????ž???????Ÿ?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w???",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Crustacea,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,Signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5017,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5018,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2019????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????#?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?,?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5019,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Okayama City in Okayama Prefecture,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5020,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2020????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????¦???????§?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????w?&?",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5021,TC,JP_16,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0230

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2018????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????%?¿?¿?%?%?À?À?%?%?Á?Á?%?%?Â?Â?%?%?Ã?Ã?%?%?Ä?Ä?%?%?Å?Å?%?%?À?À?/?2?Á?Á?&?*?Á?Á?,?-?Á?Á?/?2?Â?Â?&?*?Â?Â?,?-?Â?Â?/?2?Ã?Ã?&?*?Ã?Ã?,?2?Ä?Ä?&?*?Ä?Ä?,?-?Ä?Ä?/?2?Å?Å?&?*?Å?Å?,?-?Å?Å?/?0???????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Chelidridae,Chelydra,Chelydra serpentina,,Snapping turtle,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Chubu region,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9387.571244,9949.878697,1000000,9387.571244,9949.878697,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5022,TC,JP_17,????????????????????????,JUDGIT!,"????????????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0218

????: ????? ?????

????: 2013??2014?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??25?3????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2013.April-2014.March,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,102000000,,,1099693.767,1059452.174,102000000,1099693.767,1059452.174,JPY,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5023,TC,JP_18,?????????????????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0226

????: ????? ?????

????: 2016??2017?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,79000000,,,704312.3641,770954.5997,79000000,704312.3641,770954.5997,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5024,TC,JP_18,?????????????????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0226

????: ????? ?????

????: 2016??2017?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,65000000,,,579497.5148,634329.7339,65000000,579497.5148,634329.7339,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5025,TC,JP_18,?????????????????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0226

????: ????? ?????

????: 2016??2017?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,25000000,,,222883.6595,243972.9746,25000000,222883.6595,243972.9746,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5026,TC,JP_18,?????????????????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0226

????: ????? ?????

????: 2016??2017?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,53492.07829,58553.5139,6000000,53492.07829,58553.5139,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5027,TC,JP_18,?????????????????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0226

????: ????? ?????

????: 2016??2017?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,37550.28498,39799.51479,4000000,37550.28498,39799.51479,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5028,TC,JP_18,?????????????????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0226

????: ????? ?????

????: 2016??2017?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,37550.28498,39799.51479,4000000,37550.28498,39799.51479,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5029,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?10???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,174000000,,,1486635.167,1739475.683,174000000,1486635.167,1739475.683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5030,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?11??????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?þ???????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,68000000,,,580983.8586,679795.0945,68000000,580983.8586,679795.0945,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5031,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?10???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,14000000,,,119614.3238,139957.8136,14000000,119614.3238,139957.8136,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5032,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?11??????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?þ???????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,11000000,,,93982.683,109966.8535,11000000,93982.683,109966.8535,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5033,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?11??????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?þ???????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,85438.80273,99969.86683,10000000,85438.80273,99969.86683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5034,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?10???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,85438.80273,99969.86683,10000000,85438.80273,99969.86683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5035,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?11??????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?þ???????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,34175.52109,39987.94673,4000000,34175.52109,39987.94673,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5036,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?11??????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?þ???????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17087.76055,19993.97337,2000000,17087.76055,19993.97337,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5037,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?10???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5038,TC,JP_19,??????????????????,JUDGIT!,"??????????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0207

????: ????? ????? ?????

????: 2014??2015?

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??23?4??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????24?11??????????*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?-?????/?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?????'?*?????,?2?þ???????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5039,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,75000000,,,668650.9786,731918.9238,75000000,668650.9786,731918.9238,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5040,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,46000000,,,410105.9335,448910.2732,46000000,410105.9335,448910.2732,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5041,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,40000000,,,356613.8553,390356.7593,40000000,356613.8553,390356.7593,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5042,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2016.April-2017.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,35000000,,,328564.9935,348245.7544,35000000,328564.9935,348245.7544,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5043,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,31000000,,,276375.7378,302526.4885,31000000,276375.7378,302526.4885,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5044,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,15000000,,,133730.1957,146383.7848,15000000,133730.1957,146383.7848,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5045,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,14000000,,,119614.3238,139957.8136,14000000,119614.3238,139957.8136,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5046,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,97731.33494,100474.6851,10000000,97731.33494,100474.6851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5047,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,7000000,,,62407.42467,68312.43288,7000000,62407.42467,68312.43288,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5048,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,7000000,,,62407.42467,68312.43288,7000000,62407.42467,68312.43288,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5049,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,port,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,35661.38553,39035.67593,4000000,35661.38553,39035.67593,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5050,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,19546.26699,20094.93701,2000000,19546.26699,20094.93701,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5051,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5052,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5053,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5054,TC,JP_20,???????,JUDGIT!,"???????
???
???: ???

????: 0222

????: ????? ????????????

????: 2004????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Japan,Country,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5055,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2016.April-2016.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,46000000,,,431828.2772,457694.4201,46000000,431828.2772,457694.4201,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5056,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ogasawara Islands,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,22000000,,,187965.366,219933.707,22000000,187965.366,219933.707,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Risk assessment,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5057,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,14000000,,,124814.8493,136624.8658,14000000,124814.8493,136624.8658,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5058,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,11000000,,,107504.4684,110522.1536,11000000,107504.4684,110522.1536,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5059,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Agricultural field,12b,Y,Asia,Japan,,Iriomote-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,89153.46381,97589.18983,10000000,89153.46381,97589.18983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5060,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus rattus,,Black rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2019.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,89153.46381,97589.18983,10000000,89153.46381,97589.18983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5061,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Agricultural field,12b,Y,Asia,Japan,,Iriomote-jima Island,Site,2016.April-2016.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,9000000,,,84488.1412,89548.90828,9000000,84488.1412,89548.90828,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5062,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Agricultural field,12b,Y,Asia,Japan,,Iriomote-jima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,8000000,,,68351.04218,79975.89347,8000000,68351.04218,79975.89347,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5064,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,7000000,,,68411.93446,70332.27954,7000000,68411.93446,70332.27954,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5065,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Rhacophoridae,Polypedates,Polypedates leucomystax,,White-lipped Tree Frog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Agricultural field,12b,Y,Asia,Japan,,Iriomote-jima Island,Site,2016.April-2016.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,6000000,,,56325.42746,59699.27218,6000000,56325.42746,59699.27218,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Education,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5066,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,48865.66747,50237.34253,5000000,48865.66747,50237.34253,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5068,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,26746.03914,29276.75695,3000000,26746.03914,29276.75695,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5070,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Rhacophoridae,Polypedates,Polypedates leucomystax,,White-lipped Tree Frog,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Agricultural field,12b,Y,Asia,Japan,,Iriomote-jima Island,Site,2016.April-2016.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,18775.14249,19899.75739,2000000,18775.14249,19899.75739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Risk assessment,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5071,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Agricultural field,12b,Y,Asia,Japan,,Iriomote-jima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17087.76055,19993.97337,2000000,17087.76055,19993.97337,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5072,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,9773.133494,10047.46851,1000000,9773.133494,10047.46851,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection/Eradication,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5073,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Bufonidae,Rhinella,Rhinella marina,,Cane toad,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,Agricultural field,12b,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ishigaki-jima Island,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8543.880273,9996.986683,1000000,8543.880273,9996.986683,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Education,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Iriomote-Ishigaki National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5074,TC,JP_21,???????????????,JUDGIT!,"???????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0214

????: ????? ?????

????: 2003????????

????: ????

????: ?????

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25?3?????????????????????????????????????27?10??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Dactyloidae,Anolis,Anolis carolinensis,,Green anole,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Island forest,2,Y,Asia,Japan,,Ani-jima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,8915.346381,9758.918983,1000000,8915.346381,9758.918983,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Ogasawara National Park,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5079,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Tsushima Island,Site,2016.April-2016.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,28162.71373,29849.63609,3000000,28162.71373,29849.63609,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5080,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Akashi City/ Koube City in Hyougo Prefecture,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,26746.03914,29276.75695,3000000,26746.03914,29276.75695,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5081,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,,Asian black hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,Japan,,Tsushima Island,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,26746.03914,29276.75695,3000000,26746.03914,29276.75695,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5082,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Akashi City in Hyougo Prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,19546.26699,20094.93701,2000000,19546.26699,20094.93701,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5083,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Kakamigahara City in Gifu Prefecture,Site,2014.April-2015.March,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,19546.26699,20094.93701,2000000,19546.26699,20094.93701,JPY,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5084,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Common slider,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Pond/ river,11,N,Asia,Japan,,Akashi City in Hyougo Prefecture,Site,2015.April-2016.March,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17087.76055,19993.97337,2000000,17087.76055,19993.97337,JPY,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5085,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Kyoto City,Site,2016.April-2016.March,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,18775.14249,19899.75739,2000000,18775.14249,19899.75739,JPY,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5086,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Naruto City/ Aizumi City in Tokushima Prefecture,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17830.69276,19517.83797,2000000,17830.69276,19517.83797,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5087,TC,JP_22,?????????????,JUDGIT!,"?????????????
???
???: ???

????: 0202

????: ????? ?????????

????: 2008????????

????: ????

????: ??

?????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1/2??????",2019,Japanese,Web page,Ministry of the Environment (badget databese),Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,residential-agricultural area,12,N,Asia,Japan,,Kyoto City,Site,2017.April-2018.March,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,17830.69276,19517.83797,2000000,17830.69276,19517.83797,JPY,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Yuya Watari,Yes
NE5088,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????????Xanthomonas oryzae)???????????????????????????????20??60????????????????????????????????????????20??80?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????11??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????10%????????50%-60%??????2001????????????????????????????????????107?hm2???????????????????????2001??????2000??????100?hm2??????????????6272kg/hm2?????????????2001???????5%???????????????????????1.08?/kg?????http://www.cpic.gov.cn???????120?/hm2??????150%??????????????51869???,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xanthomonas,Xanthomonas oryzae,,????????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (1000000 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,518690000,,,89186858.37,272971738.2,518690000,89186858.37,272971738.2,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5089,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus?????????????????????????????????????20%-30%?????????50%????????2000???????????????????37.6?hm2????????????????????????????????????????2000???????2002???5.67?hm2??????????2002????2000??5?hm2??????????????????????????????????????????????????15???????????????3.33?hm2????2000?????????440hm2????????1998??????????2002????3.37?hm2????20??90?????????????????????3.33?hm2???????1999???????????????2003???1000hm2???????????????????2003????2000??200hm2??????49.32?hm2?????????1.5?hm2????????????50.82?hm2????????????????7701kg/hm2?????????????2001???????10%??????1.08?/kg??????120?/hm2??????250%??????????57513??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Brachyceridae,Lissorhoptrus,Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus,,????,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (508200 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,575130000,,,98891511.03,302674498.8,575130000,98891511.03,302674498.8,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5090,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,????Pomacea canaliculata???????30???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????7%-15%??????64%???????????????????????37??????????13?hm2?????2000????????????????????????????????????????1994????????????????????4?????????10200hm2????????19667hm2?51.8%?1995?????????????????????1998-2001??????????????????????2001???????????6667hm2?????????2002??????2000??????5500hm2?2001?????????????2300hm2????????????????????????????2001??????2000???????????1?hm2????????????????2.5?hm2???0.5?hm2??????????16.5?hm2????6272kg/hm2??????6%????1.08?/kg??????120?/hm2??????200%?????????10666??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Architaenioglossa,Ampullariidae,Pomacea,Pomacea canaliculata,,???,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (165000 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,106660000,,,18339798.94,56132112.81,106660000,18339798.94,56132112.81,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5091,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????Phytophthora megasperma???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????25%-50%???????90%???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????1991??????????????????????????????????????1995??1996?????????1997????????8?hm2????29????4??????1998?????31.5?hm2????34????5??????1999?????9.2?hm2????1998??????????????????????????????2000??????????2001??????????1999?????2001?????Schmitthenner A. F.?1998????????2000???????10?hm2??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????3.01%??????????2002????2000?????????53?hm2?????????2001?????????1.60?hm2???????????11.60?hm2?????????????????1569kg/hm2?????????????2001???????7%??????1.82?/kg?????http://www.cpic.gov.cn???????120?/hm2??????150%??????????4407??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Chromista,Oomycota,Peronosporea,Peronosporales,Peronosporaceae,Phytophthora,Phytophthora megasperma,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (116000 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,44070000,,,7577676.162,23192782.78,44070000,7577676.162,23192782.78,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5092,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,???????Synchytrium endobioticum????????????????????????3???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????50????????????????????????????17????????13????????4666.67hm2?????1995?????????2000hm2????????????????????13???????5099.67hm2??????2100m????????????????20%-30%????????1995????????????????5?????48?????644hm2?????1998???????1991?1996????????10410.34hm2?????????????????????????????45%????1991?1996????????4685 hm2???????????????????4???????616 hm2?1993???????13???????2000hm2???????154 hm2??4???616 hm2???????????????50%?????2000???????7952hm2??????14036kg/hm2??????15%??????10%??????0.5?/kg??????120?/hm2??????150%????????????1538??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Fungi,Chytridiomycota,Chytridiomycetes,Chytridiales,Synchytriaceae,Synchytrium,Synchytrium endobioticum,,??????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (7952 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,15380000,,,2644535.044,8094054.895,15380000,2644535.044,8094054.895,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5093,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????????Xanthomonas canpestris????????????????????????2001??????????????????????????????????????????153.33hm2??????98%???????????????????????????2001?????????????????????????????333hm2????????1000hm2????14074kg/hm2??????5%????0.35?/kg??????120?/hm2??????150%??????????????43??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xanthomonas,Xanthomonas campestris,,????????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (1000 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,430000,,,73936.93555,226296.7233,430000,73936.93555,226296.7233,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5095,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,??????Verticillium dahliae????20??80??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????18??????????478??????1993?????????????????????????????????????????????????????267?hm2????133?hm2?????10?t?1995????????????????????????????????160?hm2????100?hm2?????7.5?t?2000??????????????????100?hm2?????????1995?????1996??????????2003??????????????42kg/hm2?1993??????????37kg/hm2?1995??????????47kg/hm2?????????????2000?12???????????????????????9.93?/kg?????http://www.cpic.gov.cn???????120?/hm2??????150%???????????59706??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Glomerellales,Plectosphaerellaceae,Verticillium,Verticillium dahliae,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,1993-2000,Period,1993,2000,1993,2000,Potentially ongoing,597060000,,,102662294.7,314215631.7,74632500,12832786.84,39276953.96,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5096,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????Pectinophora gossypiella?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????2000????????????????????????????????????????100?hm2??????????2000????????????????1093kg/hm2?????????????2001???????4%???????9.93?/kg??????120?/hm2??????150%??????????61414??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Pectinophora,Pectinophora gossypiella,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (1000000 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,614140000,,,105599138.6,323204348.1,614140000,105599138.6,323204348.1,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5097,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,????????Tobacco ring-spot virus??1991-1993????16?????(?)??????????????????????68??????????????????????????????????????????1997??????????????????????????????????????????1??????????5?????????????2??????????3???????????????????1997??2002?????????????????????????3.92?hm2?7943???0.16?hm2?453?????8???16.84?hm2?35588???????????2002?????????????????????3?1?????????????????????????????12.5%?11.1%?????1%??????????????????0.67?hm2?1399?????????????????3%???2000????????????2002??90%?1998???????????2002??80%???????150?/hm2?????150%??????????????1395??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Viruses,Pisuviricota,Pisoniviricetes,Picornavirales,Secoviridae,Nepovirus,Tobacco ringspot virus,,???????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,13950000,,,2398651.746,7341486.722,13950000,2398651.746,7341486.722,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5100,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,??????Liriomyza sativae????1994?????????1995??????21?????????????????????????????148.8?hm2?????????30%???????100%?????30%-40%???????????????2000???????200?hm2?????????????????29661kg/hm2?????????????2001?????????2%??????????1%??????1.58?/kg??????120?/hm2??????150%????????????317186??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Agromyzidae,Liriomyza,Liriomyza sativae,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (2000000 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,3171860000,,,545389786.9,1669259360,3171860000,545389786.9,1669259360,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5101,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,??????Achatina fulica???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????140-160?hm2?????????????????????????????????????????????2001????????????????????????????????????1997?????????????????????????2003???????????????????????????????????????10?hm2?????????800???????120?/hm2?????150%??????????????9800??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Stylommatophora,Achatinidae,Achatina,Achatina fulica,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (100000 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,98000000,,,16850743.45,51574602.06,98000000,16850743.45,51574602.06,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5102,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????Eriosoma lanigerum???????????????????????????????1914??????????1929??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????20??80???????????????1/3??????????2000?kg???1985?????8000hm2???86???????????????????10%???????4%-25%?????1997a????????2002??1994??????????????11???68???602???????3728.3hm2?????1997b??1999??????????????????????1333hm2??????200?kg?2000?????????358.4 hm2??????????2002??????????669hm2????????2002????????3.3hm2????????2001??1986???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????2001?????7594.8hm2?????2001???????????????????????466.67hm2????????2001????????14154hm2?????????????????50%?????????21231hm2??????????????9064kg/hm2??????????????2001????????????????????????1500kg/hm2?200?kg/1333hm2?????????????10%??????2000?12??36??????????????3.04?/kg????????????4.24?/kg??????????http://www.cpic.gov.cn???3.64?/kg??????120?/hm2??????250%??????????19234??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aphididae,Eriosoma,Eriosoma lanigerum,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (21231 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,192340000,,,33072163.22,101223050.6,192340000,33072163.22,101223050.6,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5103,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????Laspeyresia pomonella?????????????????????????????????????????????1990????????????????????????????????????1282.7hm2?????2002??20??90???????????????????????????????1.05?hm2?????????????????1999??????3509hm2?????2.77????????1267hm2???????????????????????20%????????????6335hm2?????7618hm2????????????8661kg/hm2??????????????2001??????15%????????????10%??????3.64?/kg??????90?/hm2??????350%??????????6244??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Cydia,Cydia pomonella,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (7618 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,62440000,,,10736330.83,32860389.31,62440000,10736330.83,32860389.31,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original name if a synonym (Laspeyresia pomonella),Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5104,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,????Bruchus pisorum??1991??????7???????460hm2??????????1994????????????????6667hm2???????????????265.0?kg?????397.5??????1996????????????20??80?90????2.46?hm2?????273.06?kg?????327.7?????????2460 hm2???32.8???????1994???????????????3.3hm2???????????9590.3hm2????????452???????????????????????????36???????????????????????9590.3hm2??????452????????????????????19181hm2????????904??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Bruchus,Bruchus pisorum,,???,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (19181 ha),1991-2000,Period,1991,2000,1991,2000,Potentially ongoing,9040000,,,1554395.11,4757493.904,904000,155439.511,475749.3904,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5105,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,??????Viteus vitifoliae??????????????????200??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Phylloxeridae,Daktulosphaira,Daktulosphaira vitifoliae,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,343892.7235,1052542.899,2000000,343892.7235,1052542.899,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Original name in document was a synonym: Viteus vitifoliae,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5109,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,???????????202.4?hm2??????????????1954kg/hm2·?????????7.33???/375160hm2???????1400kg??/???????????350???1996?????????????6??????????2100????????????????98872??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Eupatorium,Eupatorium adenophorum,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Grasslands,4,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,988720000,,,170006806.8,520335107.6,988720000,170006806.8,520335107.6,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5112,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????????????????????????????????????1999????????????1000???500???????????2003??2001?????????????????6000??????????300?????????????????????1???????????2003???????????????10000??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,_,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Aquatic,11,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,1999-2001,Period,1999,2001,1999,2001,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,17194636.17,52627144.96,33333333.33,5731545.391,17542381.65,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5114,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,????????????????????????????????????2%??????1.9?/kg?????????1786??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Chrysomelidae,Bruchus,Bruchus pisorum,,???,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Ruderal habitats (= urban),12a,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,17860000,,,3070962.021,9399208.09,17860000,3070962.021,9399208.09,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cause the cost of food saving,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5115,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,????????????2000???7??????????????2607????????0.5?/kg????????????????????0.5%??????????????6518??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Phthorimaea,Phthorimaea operculella,,??????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Ruderal habitats (= urban),12a,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,65180000,,,11207463.86,34302373.08,65180000,11207463.86,34302373.08,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cause the cost of food saving,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5116,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,?????????????????????2.6%????????????61??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Amaranthaceae,Alternanthera,Alternanthera philoxeroides,,?????,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Human-maintained grasslands,4b,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (143115 ha),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,610000,,,104887.2807,321025.5843,610000,104887.2807,321025.5843,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5117,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,2000?????????????????????8589??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Nematoda,Secernentea,Aphelenchida,Aphelenchidae,Bursaphelenchus,Bursaphelenchus mucronatus,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,Y,Asia,China,,Site  (Natural reserve),Country,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,126340000,,,21723703.34,66489134.94,126340000,21723703.34,66489134.94,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Synonym of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5118,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,????????17???????78911???????????????????????????????????????????????????10?-50??????2003??????30%????????????23673?????????????????????????????????8.3%-28.0%??2-4????????18.2%????????????????????4308?????????????50?????????215400??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,??,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Ruderal habitats (= urban),12a,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (43080000 sufferer),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,2154000000,,,370372463.2,1133588702,2154000000,370372463.2,1133588702,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5119,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,????????????????????????2???????????1%?????????1996????17??????789????????????????????????????0.9%-11.5%??2-4??????6.2%????????????????????49????????????????636??????????2000??????30?????20%?2000??????????7062?/?•????????31164???????5688?????36852??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,??,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Ruderal habitats (= urban),12a,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (490000 sufferer),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,368520000,,,63365673.23,193941554.6,368520000,63365673.23,193941554.6,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5120,TC,CH1,The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Xu et al,2000??????126583?????????2.89/10??????????????????36582??????0.74%??????270????????????????????????????????50%?????????????5000?????????1???10??????2????????90?????100%?2000????????7062?/?•???????3000?/????????36582???????3185???????41?????39808??,2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,Xu et al. (2006) The distribution and economic losses of alien species invasion to China,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Ruderal habitats (= urban),12a,N,Asia,China,,China,Unit (18291 sufferer),2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,398080000,,,68448407.68,209498138.7,398080000,68448407.68,209498138.7,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5121,TC,CH2,Invasive Weed Mikania micrantha Monitoring and Risk Analysis in Dehong,Zhang et al,"????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????31991.87 hm2???????R??68?
???????????????304985.4 hm2????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????
?????",2015,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Mikania,Mikania micrantha,,???,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Open forests,2,N,Asia,China,,Dehong State,Unit (31991 ha),2012-2014,Period,2012,2014,2012,2014,Potentially ongoing,260000000,7670000,11500000,43820319.83,77009637.25,86666666.67,14606773.28,25669879.08,RMB,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"There are two estimate of invacost, with different areas but similar costs. I used the second cost which was adpoted by the author in Result section.",Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5122,TC,CH3,"Invasion, impact and countermeasures of forestry alien pests in Yuhang District, Hangzhou",Zheng and Huang,"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????",2018,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Margarodidae,Matsucoccus,Matsucoccus matsumurae,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Open forests,2,N,Asia,China,,Yuhang District,Unit (6551 ha),1981-1985,Year,1981,1985,1981,1985,Potentially ongoing,40000000,,,31038939.12,,40000000,31038939.12,,RMB,1985,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct loss of wood,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5123,TC,CH3,"Invasion, impact and countermeasures of forestry alien pests in Yuhang District, Hangzhou",Zheng and Huang,"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????",2018,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Margarodidae,Matsucoccus,Matsucoccus matsumurae,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Open forests,2,N,Asia,China,,Yuhang District,Unit (6551 ha),1981-1985,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,11251800,,,1843529.924,4047638.854,11251800,1843529.924,4047638.854,RMB,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Indirect costs (not detailed),Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Indirect loss of ecosystem service,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5124,TC,CH3,"Invasion, impact and countermeasures of forestry alien pests in Yuhang District, Hangzhou",Zheng and Huang,"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????",2018,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Margarodidae,Matsucoccus,Corythucha ciliata,,???????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Open forests,2,N,Asia,China,,Yuhang District,Unit (6551 ha),Unspecified,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,500000,,,81921.55585,179866.2816,500000,81921.55585,179866.2816,RMB,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5125,TC,CH3,"Invasion, impact and countermeasures of forestry alien pests in Yuhang District, Hangzhou",Zheng and Huang,"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????",2018,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Nematoda,Secernentea,Aphelenchida,Aphelenchidae,Bursaphelenchus,Bursaphelenchus mucronatus,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Open forests,2,N,Asia,China,,Yuhang District,Unit (1086 m3),1999-2000,Period,1999,2000,1999,2000,Potentially ongoing,1304400,,,224286.8343,686468.4788,652200,112143.4171,343234.2394,RMB,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct loss of wood,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5126,TC,CH3,"Invasion, impact and countermeasures of forestry alien pests in Yuhang District, Hangzhou",Zheng and Huang,"?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????",2018,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Nematoda,Secernentea,Aphelenchida,Aphelenchidae,Bursaphelenchus,Bursaphelenchus mucronatus,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Open forests,2,N,Asia,China,,Yuhang District,Unit (1086 m3),1999-2000,Period,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,1009600,,,165416.0056,363185.9958,1009600,165416.0056,363185.9958,RMB,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Money used for contolling species,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5130,TC,CH7,Assessment of Economic Loss Caused by Invasive Pest Coconut Weaver Moth to Hainan Coconut,Yan et al.,"??????????????????????????—???????????????????
????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????",2015,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Oecophoridae,Opisina,Opisina arenosella,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Hainan Province,Site,2012-2014,Period,2012,2014,2012,2014,Potentially ongoing,940000000,180000000,1700000000,156103780.3,280887181.1,313333333.3,52034593.42,93629060.38,RMB,2015,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The overall estimated cost is between 180000000 - 1700000000,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5133,TC,CH10,Research Progress of the Invasive Plant—Cenchrus pauciflorus,An et al,"??: ?????( Cenchrus pauciflorus Benth? ) ??????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????",2015,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus spinifex,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Zhangwu County,Unit (65000 km2),Unspecified,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,25480000,,,4231408.852,7613835.506,25480000,4231408.852,7613835.506,RMB,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Synomym of Cenchrus pauciflorus,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5134,TC,CH11,Evaluation of the Impact of Alien Invasive Plant Eupatorium indica on the National Economy of Sichuan Province,Xian et al,"??: ???????????????????????( E uP at o ir um ad en oP ho ~
S p er gn ) ?????????, ??????????????, ??????, ?????
?
?
????????????????????, ????????, ???????; ?
?????, ???????, ????????; ????, ??????, ??????
????, ?????????",2008,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Eupatorium,Eupatorium adenophorum,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Sichuan Province,Site,1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,119000000,,,21920977.31,63974355.7,119000000,21920977.31,63974355.7,RMB,1997,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture/Forestry ,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5150,TC,CH15,"ECO-ECONOMY AND ECO-SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL WETLAND INVASIVE PLANTS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA LOIS IN FUJIAN, CHINA",Hong,"?????????????????,?????????????
????,??????????????????????,?????
???
??????????????
????????????????,???????????
??,??????????????????????
????????????
??????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
???
???????????,??????,?????
????????,?????????,??????
,
?????????????????????????
???????,??????,?????,????,
?????,???,??????????????????
??????????,??????????????????????,
???????????????,?????????????????
?????????????,?????????????????,?
?????,??????????????",2005,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,????,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Wetland,10,N,Asia,China,,Erdu Village,Unit (66 ha),Unspecified,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,19800000,,,3032820.766,8788516.991,19800000,3032820.766,8788516.991,RMB,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The influence on clam. original name indocument was synonyms (Spartina alterniflora),Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5151,TC,CH15,"ECO-ECONOMY AND ECO-SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL WETLAND INVASIVE PLANTS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA LOIS IN FUJIAN, CHINA",Hong,"?????????????????,?????????????
????,??????????????????????,?????
???
??????????????
????????????????,???????????
??,??????????????????????
????????????
??????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
???
???????????,??????,?????
????????,?????????,??????
,
?????????????????????????
???????,??????,?????,????,
?????,???,??????????????????
??????????,??????????????????????,
???????????????,?????????????????
?????????????,?????????????????,?
?????,??????????????",2005,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,????,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Wetland,10,N,Asia,China,,Biejiang Village,Unit (200 ha),1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,588972.8724,1641015.579,2000000,588972.8724,1641015.579,RMB,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The influence on alga. original name indocument was synonyms (Spartina alterniflora),Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5152,TC,CH15,"ECO-ECONOMY AND ECO-SAFETY MANAGEMENT OF COASTAL WETLAND INVASIVE PLANTS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA LOIS IN FUJIAN, CHINA",Hong,"?????????????????,?????????????
????,??????????????????????,?????
???
??????????????
????????????????,???????????
??,??????????????????????
????????????
??????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????
???
???????????,??????,?????
????????,?????????,??????
,
?????????????????????????
???????,??????,?????,????,
?????,???,??????????????????
??????????,??????????????????????,
???????????????,?????????????????
?????????????,?????????????????,?
?????,??????????????",2005,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,????,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Wetland,10,N,Asia,China,,Xiamen City,Unit (1 ha),2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,78000,,,12841.95312,39737.70915,78000,12841.95312,39737.70915,RMB,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,original name indocument was synonyms (Spartina alterniflora),Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5159,TC,CH17,Damage Analysis and Loss Evaluation after Hyphantria cunea (Drury)'s Invading China,Zhao,"???????????????,????????????????
????????????????
?????????????,??????????????????
??,???????????????????
???????????,????????????????????
????????????????,????????????????????
??,???????????,?????“??????”??,??????
???????????????
??????????????,???????????????
????,????????,????????
??????????,??????????????????,???????
???
",2005,Chinese,Thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Hyphantria,Hyphantria cunea,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,23300000,,,3653236.496,10774605.53,23300000,3653236.496,10774605.53,RMB,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control/Damage-Loss/Monitoring,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5166,TC,CH19,CURRENT STATUS OF INVASIVE ALIENPESTS IN SHAANXI FORESTRY AND CONTROL STRATEGIES,Liu,"?????????????????????????????????
,
???
????????????????????????????
,
??????????
??????
,
????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????
,
?????????
??????????????????????????????????????
???????????????
:
???????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????
,  
??????
??????????????????????????????????????
?
,  
????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????
,  
??????????????????",2007,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Hyphantria,Hyphantria cunea,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Zhouzhi County,Site,1986,Year,1986,1986,1986,1986,Potentially ongoing,70000000,,,45337973.14,,70000000,45337973.14,,RMB,1986,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5167,TC,CH19,CURRENT STATUS OF INVASIVE ALIENPESTS IN SHAANXI FORESTRY AND CONTROL STRATEGIES,Liu,"?????????????????????????????????
,
???
????????????????????????????
,
??????????
??????
,
????????????????????????????????
????????????????????????????
,
?????????
??????????????????????????????????????
???????????????
:
???????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????
,  
??????
??????????????????????????????????????
?
,  
????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????
,  
??????????????????",2007,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Prostigmata,Tetranychidae,Oligonychus,Oligonychus metasequoia,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,China,,Hanzhong City,Unit (183304 m3),1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,54991200,,,17420017.51,52275763.81,54991200,17420017.51,52275763.81,RMB,1992,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5170,TC,CH21,"The Damage Risk and Loss Assessment of Adventive Organism Red Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren, in Fujian",Hu,"????????????????????????????????????
????????????????,??????????????????,??
?????????????????,????????????
???????????????????????
???????????
",2008,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,???,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Asia,China,,Longyan City,Site,2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,2306039,,,353222.372,1023568.835,2306039,353222.372,1023568.835,RMB,2005,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture/Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss/Indirect costs (not detailed),Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5172,TC,CH23,Risk Assessment of Damage and Economics Loss Evaluation by Fusarium oysporum f. cubense in Fujian Province,Liu,"????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????? 
2006 
???????
????????????????????????? 
363 
???????????
???? 
183 
?????????????? 
180 
???
 
????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????? 
76700 
????????????????
???????? 
165 
??",2009,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Hypocreales,Nectriaceae,Fusarium,Fusarium oxysporum,Fusarium oxysporum cubense,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Fujian Province,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,1830000,,,279068.5426,780060.2298,1830000,279068.5426,780060.2298,RMB,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5173,TC,CH23,Risk Assessment of Damage and Economics Loss Evaluation by Fusarium oysporum f. cubense in Fujian Province,Liu,"????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????? 
2006 
???????
????????????????????????? 
363 
???????????
???? 
183 
?????????????? 
180 
???
 
????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????? 
76700 
????????????????
???????? 
165 
??",2009,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Hypocreales,Nectriaceae,Fusarium,Fusarium oxysporum,Fusarium oxysporum cubense,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Fujian Province,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,1800000,,,274493.6484,767272.3572,1800000,274493.6484,767272.3572,RMB,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5174,TC,CH23,Risk Assessment of Damage and Economics Loss Evaluation by Fusarium oysporum f. cubense in Fujian Province,Liu,"????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????? 
2006 
???????
????????????????????????? 
363 
???????????
???? 
183 
?????????????? 
180 
???
 
????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????? 
76700 
????????????????
???????? 
165 
??",2009,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Hypocreales,Nectriaceae,Fusarium,Fusarium oxysporum,Fusarium oxysporum cubense,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Fujian Province,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,1650000,,,251619.1777,703332.9941,1650000,251619.1777,703332.9941,RMB,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5176,TC,CH25,Study the Environmental Impact Eco-assessment and Management of Pine Wood Nematode in Zhejiang Province,Li,"(1)
?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
???????
 
(2)
?????????????????????????????????
?????? 
2004 
??????????????????????
2004 
????
????? 
6.21 
??????????? 
GDP 
? 
0.055%
???????????
0.634%
??????????????????????
 
(3)
????
i
c
=10%
???????? 
2000-2005 
???????????? 
2004
????????????? 
2005 
???? 
6653.35 
??????????
IRR
??
33.63%
??????
i
c
=10%
?????????????????????????",2006,Chinese,Thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Nematoda,Secernentea,Aphelenchida,Aphelenchidae,Bursaphelenchus,Bursaphelenchus mucronatus,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,China,,Zhoushan City,Site,1992-1994,Period,1992,1994,1992,1994,Potentially ongoing,8260000,2753333,4130000,1552581.377,4539812.755,2753333.333,517527.1256,1513270.918,RMB,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Synonym of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5177,TC,CH25,Study the Environmental Impact Eco-assessment and Management of Pine Wood Nematode in Zhejiang Province,Li,"(1)
?????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
???????
 
(2)
?????????????????????????????????
?????? 
2004 
??????????????????????
2004 
????
????? 
6.21 
??????????? 
GDP 
? 
0.055%
???????????
0.634%
??????????????????????
 
(3)
????
i
c
=10%
???????? 
2000-2005 
???????????? 
2004
????????????? 
2005 
???? 
6653.35 
??????????
IRR
??
33.63%
??????
i
c
=10%
?????????????????????????",2006,Chinese,Thesis,NA,Yes,Animalia,Nematoda,Secernentea,Aphelenchida,Aphelenchidae,Bursaphelenchus,Bursaphelenchus mucronatus,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,China,,Zhejiang Province,Unit (2107 ha),1991-2004,Period,1991,2004,1991,2004,Potentially ongoing,800000000,,,150371077.7,439691308,57142857.14,10740791.26,31406522,RMB,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Synonym of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5182,TC,CH28,Status and Measures to Management and Cure of the Forest Invasive Alien Pests of Guangdong Province,Ye,"??????????????????????????????????????????????
?????????????57?3?????????3?509 2?in3????????????????
?????????????????900?????200????20??80?????????????
?????????????????????????????(?)????????????????
???????????????????????????",2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Diaspididae,Hemiberlesia,Hemiberlesia pitysophila,,???????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forests,1,N,Asia,China,,Guangdong Province,Site,1991,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,580000000,,,196095238.4,600935763.9,580000000,196095238.4,600935763.9,RMB,1991,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5185,TC,CH30,Harm of Laspeyresia pomonella in Northwest China,Qin,"????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????",2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Cydia,Cydia pomonella,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Northwest China,Site,Unspecified,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,3225000000,,,491801120.1,1374696307,3225000000,491801120.1,1374696307,RMB,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original name if a synonym (Laspeyresia pomonella),Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5186,TC,CH30,Harm of Laspeyresia pomonella in Northwest China,Qin,"????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????",2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Cydia,Cydia pomonella,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Jiuquan City,Unit (0.54 ha),1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,40000000,,,12671131.02,38024821.28,40000000,12671131.02,38024821.28,RMB,1992,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original name if a synonym (Laspeyresia pomonella),Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5187,TC,CH30,Harm of Laspeyresia pomonella in Northwest China,Qin,"????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????????????",2006,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Cydia,Cydia pomonella,,????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,Unspecified,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,2600000000,,,396490825.5,1108282294,2600000000,396490825.5,1108282294,RMB,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,original name if a synonym (Laspeyresia pomonella),Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5188,TC,CH31,"Distribution status, existing problems and control suggestions of Cenchrus pauciflorus in Liaoning Province",Qiu,"???????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????",2009,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus spinifex,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Liaoning Province,Site,Unspecified,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,836247.9668,1822679.103,5000000,836247.9668,1822679.103,RMB,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Synomym of Cenchrus pauciflorus,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5189,TC,CH31,"Distribution status, existing problems and control suggestions of Cenchrus pauciflorus in Liaoning Province",Qiu,"???????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????????????",2009,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus spinifex,,?????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Agricultural habitats,12b,N,Asia,China,,Liaoning Province,Site,Unspecified,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,7000000,,,1170747.154,2551750.744,7000000,1170747.154,2551750.744,RMB,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Synomym of Cenchrus pauciflorus,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5192,TC,CH32,The evaluation about economic and environmental effects of alien plant invasion,Liu,"???????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
???????????????????????????
?????????50????5????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
???????????????20??80?????????????????
??????????????????}?El??????????????????
??????????????????????????????????????
????????
???????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
?????????????????????????????????????
??",2007,Chinese,Master thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Solidago,Solidago canadensis,,???????,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Wetland,10,N,Asia,China,,Jiangsu Province,Site,Unspecified,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,12000000,,,1864778.629,4739594.157,12000000,1864778.629,4739594.157,RMB,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
NE5205,WoS,SP_1_MX,"Reconversión de cultivos como resultado de la presencia de huanglongbing en Colima, México. Crop reconversion as a result of the presence of huanglongbing in Colima, Mexico","Granados-Ramírez, G. R., & Hernández-Hernández, R","The state of Colima is known as the main producer of lemon. In 2010 the presence of citrus greening or Huanglonbing (HLB), a disease affecting, was detected in this region and has since translated into multiplying losses. Up to this date, no cure for it is known and the low profitability of the production forces growers to withdraw their crops. Therefore, the productive reconversion modifies the produc- tion pattern by establishing alternate crops with a higher agronomic and social feasibility, as well as a better economic profitability. The main goal of this research was to quantify the changes in the crops and to assess the potential of introducing new ones. In order to monitor, identify and quantify such changes, satellite imagery analysis, building and analysis of agricultural databases, on site measure- ments and interviews were conducted. An increasing number of crops were substituted, close to 5,000 ha of citrus have been replaced, which amounts to a reduction of 84,721 tons in the production of Mexican lemon and a loss of $302, 636,729 MXN, approximately. The area of emergent crops such as papaya and pineapple keeps increasing and has represented a higher income for producers.",2018,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Alphaproteobacteria,Rhizobiales,Rhizobiaceae,Candidatus,Candidatus liberibacter,,Huanglongbing disease (HLB),Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,citric cultures,12b,N,North America,Mexico,,Colima,Site,2010-2014,Period,2010,2014,2010,2014,One-time,454198260,,,23997984.84,50238685.55,90839652,4799596.968,10047737.11,MXN,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Martin Nuñez/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE5206,WoS,SP_2_AR,"Control mecánico del árbol no nativo Ligustrum lucidum (Oleaceae): supervivencia, regeneración y costos. Mechanical control of the non-native tree ligustrum lucidum: Survival regeneration and cost","Tatiana Alejandra Valfré-Giorello, Romina Cecilia Torre, Fernando Rafael Barri & Daniel Renison","Background and Aims: There is an increasing demand of cost-benefit studies for the control of invasive non-native species. We assessed the efficiency of the application of mechanical control treatments on the non-native species Ligustrum lucidum, through resprouting and seedling regeneration, integrating cost and effort.M&M: The study involved 120 trees, to which we applied the following treatments: 1) control group, uncut trees, 2) felling, 3) felling and covering the stump with black polyethylene. Additionally, a half of the trees were selected in forest physiognomy and a half in shrubland physiognomy. We removed all seedlings smaller than 50 cm tall around each treated tree.Results: After 12 months, and two treatment applications, survival for the control group, felling, and felling with polyethylene cover was 100%, 95% and 68%, respectively. Resprout height was 78% and 95% lower under felling and felling with polyethylene cover treatments, respectively, than in the control group. Vegetation physiognomy had no effect on survival and resprout growth, while seedling regeneration was 300% higher in forest than in shrubland. The cost of application of felling with polyethylene cover was 150% higher than the cost of applying of felling only. Conclusions: To control L. lucidum, we recommend felling with polyethylene cover because the higher cost and effort is compensated by its greater efficacy in the reduction of survival and height. We recommend the manual removal of seedlings mainly in sites with a shrubland physiognomy and a low cover of adults of L. lucidum.",2019,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Oleaceae,Ligustrum,Ligustrum lucidum,,Privet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Chaco Serrano,2,Y,South America,Argentina,,Reserva Natural Vaquerías ,Site,2014,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,One-time,28,,,13.42294001,,28,13.42294001,,USD,2019,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no," costes 0,7 y 1,74 USD por  árbol para la tala y la tala+polietileno respectivamente. Son 120 árboles en 3 tratamientos.
Dos datos: para solo tala: 0,7 * 40 árboles = 28 USD y  para tala+polietileno 1,74 * 40 árboles = 69,6 USD",Martin Nuñez/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE5207,WoS,SP_2_AR,"Control mecánico del árbol no nativo Ligustrum lucidum (Oleaceae): supervivencia, regeneración y costos. Mechanical control of the non-native tree ligustrum lucidum: Survival regeneration and cost","Tatiana Alejandra Valfré-Giorello, Romina Cecilia Torre, Fernando Rafael Barri & Daniel Renison","Background and Aims: There is an increasing demand of cost-benefit studies for the control of invasive non-native species. We assessed the efficiency of the application of mechanical control treatments on the non-native species Ligustrum lucidum, through resprouting and seedling regeneration, integrating cost and effort.M&M: The study involved 120 trees, to which we applied the following treatments: 1) control group, uncut trees, 2) felling, 3) felling and covering the stump with black polyethylene. Additionally, a half of the trees were selected in forest physiognomy and a half in shrubland physiognomy. We removed all seedlings smaller than 50 cm tall around each treated tree.Results: After 12 months, and two treatment applications, survival for the control group, felling, and felling with polyethylene cover was 100%, 95% and 68%, respectively. Resprout height was 78% and 95% lower under felling and felling with polyethylene cover treatments, respectively, than in the control group. Vegetation physiognomy had no effect on survival and resprout growth, while seedling regeneration was 300% higher in forest than in shrubland. The cost of application of felling with polyethylene cover was 150% higher than the cost of applying of felling only. Conclusions: To control L. lucidum, we recommend felling with polyethylene cover because the higher cost and effort is compensated by its greater efficacy in the reduction of survival and height. We recommend the manual removal of seedlings mainly in sites with a shrubland physiognomy and a low cover of adults of L. lucidum.",2019,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Oleaceae,Ligustrum,Ligustrum lucidum,,Privet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Chaco Serrano,2,Y,South America,Argentina,,Reserva Natural Vaquerías ,Site,2014,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,One-time,69.6,,,33.36559374,,69.6,33.36559374,,USD,2019,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no," costes 0,7 y 1,74 USD por  árbol para la tala y la tala+polietileno respectivamente. Son 120 árboles en 3 tratamientos.
Dos datos: para solo tala: 0,7 * 40 árboles = 28 USD y  para tala+polietileno 1,74 * 40 árboles = 69,6 USD",Martin Nuñez/Elena Angulo,Yes
NE5209,WoS,SP_4_AR,Analisis costo-beneficio del control de vectores en la transmisión potencial de dengue,"Pablo Wenceslao Orellano, Elena Pedroni","Objetivos. Evaluar el costo-beneficio de una intervención de control de mosquitos adultos con fumigación, junto con actividades de control de formas inmaduras de Aedes aegypti, para evitar la transmisión en una situación de alto riesgo. Métodos. Se realizó un análisis de costo-beneficio desde una perspectiva social. Se comparó una intervención para el control de mosquitos adultos y formas inmaduras contra una hipóte- sis de no-intervención, de enero a abril de 2007, en la ciudad de Clorinda, Argentina. Se con- sideraron los costos directos y los beneficios indirectos e intangibles, estandarizados a dólares internacionales (I$) utilizando la paridad de poder adquisitivo. Se asumió una incidencia de 50 casos de dengue por 1 000 habitantes en la hipótesis de no-intervención. Resultados. De enero a abril de 2007 se presentaron 176 casos de dengue en Clorinda, pero sólo cinco fueron autóctonos. El valor presente neto fue de I$ 196 879 en la estrategia de apli- cación de control, mientras que en la de no aplicación se calculó en I$ –106 724, lo que signi- ficaría un ahorro de I$ 303 602 (I$ 6,46 por habitante) con la intervención. El análisis de sen- sibilidad evidenció que, con más de 1 363 casos de dengue (incidencia total de 29 por 1 000 habitantes) y un caso de dengue hemorrágico, la intervención es costo-benéfica. Conclusiones. Los resultados sugieren que el control vectorial, incluyendo la fumigación para mosquitos adultos, debe evaluarse en situaciones de alto riesgo de transmisión como una alternativa costo-benéfica en países no endémicos.",2008,Spanish,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes aegypti,,Yellow fever mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,City,12,N,South America,Argentina,,Clorinda,Site,jan-april 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,378372,,,491024.7259,,378372,491024.7259,,USD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/David Roiz,Yes
SC2,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Don˜ ana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Fundulidae,Fundulus,Fundulus heteroclitus,,Mummichog,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,0.968,,,1.144366698,1.138988259,0.968,1.144366698,1.138988259,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates. 40% protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC3,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Don˜ ana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Lepomis,Lepomis gibbosus,,pumpkinseed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,0.968,,,1.144366698,1.138988259,0.968,1.144366698,1.138988259,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates. 40% protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC4,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Don˜ ana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Centrarchidae,Micropterus,Micropterus salmoides,,largemouth bass,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,0.968,,,1.144366698,1.138988259,0.968,1.144366698,1.138988259,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates. 40% protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC5,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Asia,China,,Kunming Lake,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,1.25,,,1.519901513,4.248471406,1.25,1.519901513,4.248471406,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per day for 35 women paid to remove the weed using pitchforks (mechanical control),Desika Moodley,
SC6,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Don˜ ana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Testudines,Emydidae,Trachemys,Trachemys scripta,,Yellow-bellied Slider Turtle,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2019,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1.254,,,1.48247504,1.475507518,1.254,1.48247504,1.475507518,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates. 40% protected areas,Melina Kouranditou/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
SC11,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Donana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Red water fern,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,3.267,,,3.862237605,3.844085376,3.267,3.862237605,3.844085376,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates; 40%protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC12,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Donana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arales,Araceae,Pistia,Pistia stratiotes,,water lettuce,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,3.267,,,3.862237605,3.844085376,3.267,3.862237605,3.844085376,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates; 40%protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC13,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Don˜ ana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Aizoaceae,Carpobrotus,Carpobrotus edulis,,hottentot fig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,4.026,,,4.759525129,4.737155716,4.026,4.759525129,4.737155716,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates. 40% protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC14,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Don˜ ana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,5.0952,,,6.023530164,5.99522002,5.0952,6.023530164,5.99522002,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates. 40% protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC16,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Donana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,5.8344,,,6.897410187,6.864992873,5.8344,6.897410187,6.864992873,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates; 40%protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC17,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Donana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Cyprinus,Cyprinus carpio,,common carp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,6.0192,,,7.115880193,7.082436086,6.0192,7.115880193,7.082436086,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates; 40%protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC19,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Donana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cyprinodontiformes,Poeciliidae,Gambusia,Gambusia holbrooki,,Eastern mosquitofish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,6.3492,,,7.506005204,7.470727538,6.3492,7.506005204,7.470727538,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates; 40%protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC20,GS,GarciaLlorente2008,Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management,"García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., González, J. A., Alcorlo, P., & Montes, C.","Research on biological invasions has traditionally focused on the ecological component of
invasive alien species, either without considering or by considering in a restricted way, the
knowledge of the social component. An understanding of the human dimension of invasions
is critical to effectively tackle the problems associated with invasive alien species.
We distributed questionnaires to evaluate the social perceptions and attitudes of different
stakeholder groups affected by invasive alien species in the Donana social–ecological system
(SW Spain). Our analysis served to characterize respondents based on their knowledge
and perceptions of the impacts of invasive alien species, and the attitudes toward their
introduction and eradication. Hierarchical cluster and principal component analyses identified
five categories of respondents, and potential support of eradication programs was
assessed using a contingent valuation approach. The five stakeholder groups differed in
their degree of knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to pay for eradication.
The fact that different stakeholders have remarkably different perceptions about the
impacts and benefits caused by invasive alien species, and different attitudes toward their
introduction or eradication should be considered in any decision-making process regarding
their management, particularly when developing appropriate educational and informative
programs. Consultation with different stakeholders should also be encouraged from the
onset of any decision-making process. In this way, trade-offs involved in IAS management
are directly addressed and successful implementation of management practices is
facilitated.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Linepithema,Linepithema humile,,Argentine ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Unit (Household) for site,June 2006–September 2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,7.4184,,,8.770010238,8.728791843,7.4184,8.770010238,8.728791843,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,WTP estimates; 40%protected areas,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC22,,Tumber2014,Pierce’s disease costs California $104 million per year.,Tumber et al.,"Pierce’s disease of grapevines, caused by a strain of the bacteria Xylella fastidiosa, threatens an industry with a farm value of production exceeding $3 billion per year. The grape industry incurs substantial costs from losses of vines to the disease and efforts to mitigate damage. Additional costs are borne by the public in providing programs that aim to contain the disease and develop longer-term solutions, and by the citrus, nursery and grape industries in complying with those programs. Aggregating the costs of vine losses, industry assessments, compliance costs, and expenditures by government entities, we estimate the cost of Pierce’s disease in California is approximately $104.4 million per year. Of that, $48.3 million funds Pierce’s disease activities undertaken by various government agencies, the nursery and citrus industries and the UC system, and $56.1 million is the cost of lost production and vine replacement borne by grape growers",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xylella,Xylella fastidiosa,,Pierce’s disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,vineyards,NA,NA,North America,USA,California,Napa County,Unit (1 acre),1 year,Year,2010,2011,2010,2011,One-time,8.22,,,9.24023001,9.24023001,8.22,9.24023001,9.24023001,USD,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"yearly assessment cost for PD The funds are applied to inspection, detection, and prevention of and education about PD and GWSS,",,
SC27,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Senegal,,Lower Senegal Delta,Unit (Delta),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,12,,,15.06175379,36.21718081,12,15.06175379,36.21718081,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Cost per ha of Salvinia infestation on fishing,Desika Moodley,
SC30,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Senegal,,Lower Senegal Delta,Unit (Delta),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,19,,,23.84777683,57.34386961,19,23.84777683,57.34386961,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Cost per ha of Salvinia infestation on rice production,Desika Moodley,
SC33,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,35,,,42.55724236,79.95171637,35,42.55724236,79.95171637,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for initial clearing of light abundance stands (integrated control),Desika Moodley,
SC34,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,35,,,42.55724236,79.95171637,35,42.55724236,79.95171637,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for follow-up clearing (integrated control),Desika Moodley,
SC35,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nseleni River,Unit (100 ha),2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,36,,,43.77316357,82.23605112,36,43.77316357,82.23605112,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for hand-spray application (chemical control),Desika Moodley,
SC38,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Unit (1670 ha),2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,40,,,48.63684841,91.37339014,40,48.63684841,91.37339014,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare using herbicides (chemical control),Desika Moodley,
SC41,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,45,,,54.71645447,102.7950639,45,54.71645447,102.7950639,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare over ten days for hand-weeding and ploughing (mechanical control),Desika Moodley,
SC49,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nseleni River,Unit (410 ha),2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,64,,,77.81895746,146.1974242,64,77.81895746,146.1974242,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs per hectare for follow up spraying and manual clearing used with bio-control (i.e. Integrated approach),Desika Moodley,
SC50,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Triplet et al., 2000",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Africa,Senegal,,Senegal,Unit (200 ha),2000,Period,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,67,,,84.09479198,202.2125928,67,84.09479198,202.2125928,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Societal costs of mechanical/manual management (6000 hours) per hectare (excludes renting/buying equipment),Desika Moodley,
SC51,,3,The management of alien species in India,Fatik Baran Modal,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Asia,India,,Unspecified,Country,One-time,Year,1996,1996,1996,1996,One-time,70,,,109.3935023,475.3105744,70,109.3935023,475.3105744,USD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs for manual removal,Achyut Kumar,
SC52,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,70,,,85.11448473,159.9034327,70,85.11448473,159.9034327,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of aerial or hand-spraying per cropping season using three litres per hectare (chemical control),Desika Moodley,
SC53,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Asia,India,,India,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,70,,,85.11448473,351.9380009,70,85.11448473,351.9380009,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of aerial or hand-spraying per cropping season using three litres per hectare (chemical control),Desika Moodley,
SC54,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Triplet et al., 2000",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Africa,Senegal,,Senegal,Unit (200 ha),2000,Period,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,71,,,89.11537657,214.2849864,71,89.11537657,214.2849864,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Financial costs of mechanical/manual management (6000 hours) per hectare (excludes renting/buying equipment),Desika Moodley,
SC57,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,83,,,100.9214605,189.5997845,83,100.9214605,189.5997845,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for initial clearing of medium abundance stands (integrated control),Desika Moodley,
SC60,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus pilosus,,Sanburs,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,2005,2006,2005,2006,One-time,100,,,118.2197002,275.5681804,50,59.10985009,137.7840902,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. This species was successfully  eradicated. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC62,,Buddenhagen2005,"The cost of quinine Cinchona pubescens control on Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos","Buddenhagen, C. and Yánez, P.","We analyse the cost of controlling the invasive quinine tree Cinchona pubescens Vahl in the highlands of Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos. Control costs in ten 400 m2 plots formed the basis for estimating the cost of control over the whole island. In the plots, densities were 2100–24,000 stems/ha (stems >150 cm tall) and 55,000–138,000 stems/ha (all size classes combined). Control involved uprooting small plants, and applying of a mix of metsulfuron methyl and picloram to cut stumps or to machete cuts in the bark of larger trees. These methods are presently used by Galapagos National Park field crews to control quinine. Costs (in man hours, herbicide and US$) were related to stem density; the density of stems summed across four height classes was a better predictor of costs than density of any one size class. Regressions (on all size classes combined) formed the basis for predictive models of costs. Costs ranged from $14 to $2225 per ha depending on stem density. The amount of herbicide (active ingredient/ha) that must be applied to high density stands of quinine is higher than typical rates of application in an agricultural setting. The cost of treating all existing plants once across quinine’s known range on Santa Cruz Island (c. 11,000 ha) was estimated at c. US$1.65 million.",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Rubiaceae,Cinchona,Cinchona pubescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Miconia and Fern-Sedge Zones,3,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos",Unit (ha),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,103,,,133.6661983,354.4190051,103,133.6661983,354.4190051,USD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimative of control in plots of 20 x 20 m with high, medium and low density quinine on Santa Cruz, using cutting, herbicide, and uprooted",Gustavo Heringer,
SC70,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,125,,,151.9901513,285.5418442,125,151.9901513,285.5418442,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for initial clearing of dense stands (integrated control),Desika Moodley,
SC77,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,140,,,170.2289695,319.8068655,140,170.2289695,319.8068655,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for labour and equipment (mechanical control),Desika Moodley,
SC83,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Benin,,Benin,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,151,,,183.6041028,471.6548891,151,183.6041028,471.6548891,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs per farmer for inital establishment of Mud Silos to protect crops from the larger grain borer,Desika Moodley,
SC84,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Chikwenhere and Keswani, 1997",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Zimbabwe,,Zimbabwe,Unit (16 ha),1989,Period,1989,1989,1989,1989,One-time,156,,,195.8027992,722.8693656,156,195.8027992,722.8693656,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Societal costs of mechanical/manual management (3200 hours) per hectare (excludes renting/buying equipment),Desika Moodley,
SC93,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Unit (1670 ha),2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,185,,,224.9454239,422.6019294,185,224.9454239,422.6019294,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for follow-up clearing (mechanical control),Desika Moodley,
SC99,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Dipsacales,Caprifoliaceae,Lonicera,Lonicera japonica,,Japanese honeysuckle/Chinese honeysuckle/Golden-and-silver honeysuckle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,200,,,318.7221655,318.0234051,18.18181818,28.97474232,28.91121865,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa,No
SC103,,Bailey2008,"Comparison of Three Physical Management Techniques for Controlling Variable-leaf Milfoil in Maine Lakes benthic barrier, exotic species, hand removal, invasive aquatic plants, milfoil, Myriophyllum heterophyllum, nuisance species EURASIAN WATERMILFO",Bailey JE Calhoun AJK,"Variable-leaf watermilfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) is a nuisance aquatic plant in the northeastern United States. It grows in thick mats, often out-competing native vegetation, clogging boat motors, and deterring people from swimming and other water-related activities. We implemented three physical management techniques—hand removal, cutting, and benthic mats—on eight infested lakes in Maine to deter-mine the most effective method to control this aquatic inva-sive. All three treatments resulted in significantly lower plant regrowth than the control. No significant differences were found among the three treatments in plant regrowth or among lakes in percent regrowth of variable-leaf watermil-foil. The costs of hand removal and cutting were roughly one-third the cost of installing benthic mats, although mat installation required less time to implement than the other two methods. Cutting was found to be unrealistic in practice because of difficulties in implementation. In conclusion, de-termining the most effective management technique for an area depends on the extent and density of the infestation. Our results suggest benthic mats provide a cost-effective op-tion for thick, extensive infestations, whereas hand removal is more efficient in areas with small, high-density infestations or for selective removal in sparsely infested stands of mostly native macrophytes. Hand removal would also be useful dur-ing management surveys when individual plants or small clusters of variable-leaf watermilfoil are detected. Based on our study we suggest that benthic barrier and hand-removal methods are the most effective nonmechanical management techniques for lake associations and governmental agencies to incorporate into their management plans.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum heterophyllum,,Variable-leaf milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"We selected eight lakes (Table 1) in Maine, USA, from the MDEP list of lakes with confirmed invasions of variable-leaf watermilfoil",11,NA,North America,USA,,Maine,Site,Unspecified,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,208,208,208,261.070399,261.070399,208,261.070399,261.070399,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"Start/end year: ""implemented the three management techniques in spring and early summer 2005""; cost = $97 per hour x 2 hrs 10 mins. Potentially ongoing but not necessarily every year",Nigel Taylor,
SC104,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Maryland,Washington,Site,2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,215.5,,,2148418.601,2148418.601,1711688,2148418.601,2148418.601,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"anti-fouling paint ranges for 136,935 square feet",Elena Manfrini/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
SC108,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Unit (1670 ha),2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,224,,,272.3663511,511.6909848,224,272.3663511,511.6909848,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for inital clearing (mechanical control),Desika Moodley,
SC112,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Chikwenhere and Keswani, 1997",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Zimbabwe,North Dakota,Zimbabwe,Unit (16 ha),1989,Period,1989,1989,1989,1989,One-time,247,,,310.0210988,1144.543162,247,310.0210988,1144.543162,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Financial costs of mechanical/manual management (3200 hours) per hectare (excludes renting/buying equipment),Desika Moodley,
SC116,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Senegal,,Lower Senegal Delta,Unit(Delta),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,268,,,336.3791679,808.8503714,268,336.3791679,808.8503714,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Cost per ha of Salvinia infestation on tourism,Desika Moodley,
SC117,,Bailey2008,"Comparison of Three Physical Management Techniques for Controlling Variable-leaf Milfoil in Maine Lakes benthic barrier, exotic species, hand removal, invasive aquatic plants, milfoil, Myriophyllum heterophyllum, nuisance species EURASIAN WATERMILFO",Bailey JE Calhoun AJK,"Variable-leaf watermilfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) is a nuisance aquatic plant in the northeastern United States. It grows in thick mats, often out-competing native vegetation, clogging boat motors, and deterring people from swimming and other water-related activities. We implemented three physical management techniques—hand removal, cutting, and benthic mats—on eight infested lakes in Maine to deter-mine the most effective method to control this aquatic inva-sive. All three treatments resulted in significantly lower plant regrowth than the control. No significant differences were found among the three treatments in plant regrowth or among lakes in percent regrowth of variable-leaf watermil-foil. The costs of hand removal and cutting were roughly one-third the cost of installing benthic mats, although mat installation required less time to implement than the other two methods. Cutting was found to be unrealistic in practice because of difficulties in implementation. In conclusion, de-termining the most effective management technique for an area depends on the extent and density of the infestation. Our results suggest benthic mats provide a cost-effective op-tion for thick, extensive infestations, whereas hand removal is more efficient in areas with small, high-density infestations or for selective removal in sparsely infested stands of mostly native macrophytes. Hand removal would also be useful dur-ing management surveys when individual plants or small clusters of variable-leaf watermilfoil are detected. Based on our study we suggest that benthic barrier and hand-removal methods are the most effective nonmechanical management techniques for lake associations and governmental agencies to incorporate into their management plans.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum heterophyllum,,Variable-leaf milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"We selected eight lakes (Table 1) in Maine, USA, from the MDEP list of lakes with confirmed invasions of variable-leaf watermilfoil",11,NA,North America,USA,,Maine,Site,Unspecified,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,272,272,272,341.3997525,341.3997525,272,341.3997525,341.3997525,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"Start/end year: ""implemented the three management techniques in spring and early summer 2005""; cost = $96 per hour x 2 hrs 50 mins.Potentially ongoing but not necessarily every year",Nigel Taylor,
SC121,,Borrel2011,Chemical control of invasive Psidium guajava in Swaziland: A preliminary assessment of costs and efficacy,"Borrel, A.J., Brown, L.R., Slater, K.","Psidium guajava (guava) is recognised as the third most important invasive alien plant species in the
moist savanna biome of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. The cost of initial clearing of alien plants
reaches up to R3 000-00 per ha, therefore the application of correct control methods is essential for
cost-effective reduction of the spread. The aim of this study was to test the cost effectiveness of
applying various herbicides to guava in the Swaziland Sour Bushveld. Four plots were selected for
standing plant treatments, five for cut stump treatments and two for controls. Within each of these
plots, five sub-plots were randomly located and the number of plant stems, base diameter, maximum
height, and crown diameter was recorded before application of the herbicides. Picloram, fluroxypyr,
bromacil, tebuthiuron and imazapyr were used either alone or in combinations. Eleven months after
herbicide application, the treated plants were measured again. Bromacil/tebuthiuron liquid soil
application gave the best results in terms of cost (0.09 c/stem) for standing plant treatments. The
picloram/fluroxypyr cut stump treatment (4.5% concentration) cost the least to apply (0.05 c/stem), and
no resprouting was observed. Results from this study can be used as baseline figures for managers
planning to control guava.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Psidium,Psidium guajava,,Guava,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,Swaziland,,Upper Middleveld,Unit (1 ha),2008-2009,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,One-time,299,,,41.20555446,100.074066,299,41.20555446,100.074066,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Picloram/fluroxypyr (2%) + adjuvant (0.5%) - cut stump. Cost per hectare, combining herbicide and labour costs.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC128,,Bailey2008,"Comparison of Three Physical Management Techniques for Controlling Variable-leaf Milfoil in Maine Lakes benthic barrier, exotic species, hand removal, invasive aquatic plants, milfoil, Myriophyllum heterophyllum, nuisance species EURASIAN WATERMILFO",Bailey JE Calhoun AJK,"Variable-leaf watermilfoil (Myriophyllum heterophyllum) is a nuisance aquatic plant in the northeastern United States. It grows in thick mats, often out-competing native vegetation, clogging boat motors, and deterring people from swimming and other water-related activities. We implemented three physical management techniques—hand removal, cutting, and benthic mats—on eight infested lakes in Maine to deter-mine the most effective method to control this aquatic inva-sive. All three treatments resulted in significantly lower plant regrowth than the control. No significant differences were found among the three treatments in plant regrowth or among lakes in percent regrowth of variable-leaf watermil-foil. The costs of hand removal and cutting were roughly one-third the cost of installing benthic mats, although mat installation required less time to implement than the other two methods. Cutting was found to be unrealistic in practice because of difficulties in implementation. In conclusion, de-termining the most effective management technique for an area depends on the extent and density of the infestation. Our results suggest benthic mats provide a cost-effective op-tion for thick, extensive infestations, whereas hand removal is more efficient in areas with small, high-density infestations or for selective removal in sparsely infested stands of mostly native macrophytes. Hand removal would also be useful dur-ing management surveys when individual plants or small clusters of variable-leaf watermilfoil are detected. Based on our study we suggest that benthic barrier and hand-removal methods are the most effective nonmechanical management techniques for lake associations and governmental agencies to incorporate into their management plans.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum heterophyllum,,Variable-leaf milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"We selected eight lakes (Table 1) in Maine, USA, from the MDEP list of lakes with confirmed invasions of variable-leaf watermilfoil",11,NA,North America,USA,,Maine,Site,Unspecified,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,314,314,314,394.1158908,394.1158908,314,394.1158908,394.1158908,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,No,"Start/end year: ""implemented the three management techniques in spring and early summer 2005""; cost = $314. Sentence containing this cost is not clear - is this a per hour cost, or overall cost? Installation only takes 20 mins. Assume it's total cost, since Table 2 states this method is expensive; if it were per hour cost, the total cost would be about $100, which is actually cheaper than other methods. Potentially ongoing but not necessarily every year.",Nigel Taylor,
SC132,,Borrel2011,Chemical control of invasive Psidium guajava in Swaziland: A preliminary assessment of costs and efficacy,"Borrel, A.J., Brown, L.R., Slater, K.","Psidium guajava (guava) is recognised as the third most important invasive alien plant species in the
moist savanna biome of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. The cost of initial clearing of alien plants
reaches up to R3 000-00 per ha, therefore the application of correct control methods is essential for
cost-effective reduction of the spread. The aim of this study was to test the cost effectiveness of
applying various herbicides to guava in the Swaziland Sour Bushveld. Four plots were selected for
standing plant treatments, five for cut stump treatments and two for controls. Within each of these
plots, five sub-plots were randomly located and the number of plant stems, base diameter, maximum
height, and crown diameter was recorded before application of the herbicides. Picloram, fluroxypyr,
bromacil, tebuthiuron and imazapyr were used either alone or in combinations. Eleven months after
herbicide application, the treated plants were measured again. Bromacil/tebuthiuron liquid soil
application gave the best results in terms of cost (0.09 c/stem) for standing plant treatments. The
picloram/fluroxypyr cut stump treatment (4.5% concentration) cost the least to apply (0.05 c/stem), and
no resprouting was observed. Results from this study can be used as baseline figures for managers
planning to control guava.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Psidium,Psidium guajava,,Guava,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,Swaziland,,Upper Middleveld,Unit (1 ha),2008-2009,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,One-time,342,,,47.13143687,114.4659885,342,47.13143687,114.4659885,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Picloram/fluroxypyr (4.5%) + Adjuvant (0.5%) - cut stump. Cost per hectare, combining herbicide and labour costs.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC139,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,400,,,486.3684841,913.7339014,400,486.3684841,913.7339014,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for aerial application (chemical control),Desika Moodley,
SC140,,Cacho2012,Valuing community engagement in biosecurity surveillance.,"Cacho OJ, Reeve I, Tramell J et al","Although there is evidence that passive surveillance services provided by the public can be very valuable (in terms of both reduced program costs and increased probability of success in managing pests) little is known about the return on investment for this type of expenditure. Enabling passive surveillance requires community information campaigns and incentive schemes. This takes funds away from other activities, so it is important to estimate the value of these campaigns relative to other alternatives, such as increasing active (structured) surveillance. This project contributes towards an understanding of the value of passive surveillance provided by members of the community using a case study: the red imported fire ant (RIFA) eradication program in Brisbane. The RIFA program, managed by Biosecurity Queensland Control Centre (BQCC), is well documented. BQCC has an intense public awareness program with multiple activities, including broad and targeted coverage of distinct community groups and zones within the Brisbane area. We have combined data on community engagement events, reports from the public and nest detections recorded by BQCC, with census data to estimate relationships between demographic characteristics of an area and the likelihood that residents from that area will report encounters with RIFA. In this report we present background information and hypotheses regarding the role of community surveillance in the management of biological invasions. This is followed by details of the datasets used and results of a number of analyses. We show the importance of the data clean-up process and identify the limitations that arise when a database designed primarily to track public reports is used for spatio-temporal analyses where accurate dating of events is important. We also estimate the return on investment in community engagement in terms of the savings in structured-search costs it brings. This estimate uses probability maps to calculate the amount of active search that would have been required to detect all the known ant colonies in the period 2006-2010 if passive surveillance would not have been available. Assuming active search costs $400/ha we obtain a value of $52 million return per $1 million invested in community engagement.",2012,English,Official report,Hester2017,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,urban,12a,N,Oceania,Australia,Queensland,Brisbane,Unit (ha),2006-2010,Period,2006,2010,2006,2010,Potentially ongoing,400,,,442.1706986,277.2837849,80,88.43413972,55.45675699,AUD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"cost of a one-time active search per hectare, calculated from four years of control efforts",Jennifer Bufford,
SC142,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Pilosella,Hieracium pilosella nigrescens,,Mouseear hawkweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,roadside,12a,N,Oceania,Australia,Tasmania,"Roadside, Midlands Highway",Unit (<1 ha),1 year,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2009,2009,One-time,402,,,457.6726815,368.898259,402,457.6726815,368.898259,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Rudman & Goninon 2002",Jennifer Bufford,
SC146,,Hedge2003,"A review of Spartina management in Washington State, US",Hedge P Kriwoken LK Patten K,"Management of non-native Spartinaplants including Spar-tina  alterniflora  Lois.,Spartina  anglica  C.  HubbandSpartinapatens (Ait.) Muhl. in Washington State, U.S. evolved duringthe 1990s from small-scale field trials to a large-scale integrat-ed pest management program. The development and imple-mentation  of  the  program  were  significantly  hindered  bystakeholder conflict, particularly regarding the use of herbi-cide  in  estuarine  environments.  In  1995,  Washington  StateDepartment  of  Agriculture  was  appointed  to  manage  theseinvasive  species.  Agency  coordination  and  strategy  reviewswere  undertaken.  A  wide  range  of  control  techniques,  in-cluding physical removal, mowing and herbicide, were estab-lished,   with   all   techniques   demonstrating   considerablelimitations. The combination of mowing and herbicide pro-vided  the  greatest  efficacy  but  was  expensive.  Developmentof biological control options is in progress but will take yearsto  prove  effectiveness  for  Spartinamanagement.  Programprogress based on existing mapping and efficacy data is diffi-cult  to  gauge.  This  program  demonstrates  that  Spartinaplants are difficult and expensive to eradicate. Between 1995and  2000,  infestations  increased  in  area  by  250%,  affectingmore than 8,093 ha of intertidal land. During this period, ap-proximately 15% of the infestation was treated annually. Al-though  the  program  has  evolved  considerably,  substantiallyincreasing knowledge on the management of Spartina, infes-tations  in  Washington  State  continue  to  present  a  range  ofmanagement  challenges,  including  the  development  of  astandardized and integrated mapping procedures, cost-effec-tive  control  techniques  and  improvements  to  stakeholdermanagement.",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus cynosuroides,,Spartina,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,12a,N,North America,USA,,Washington,Unit (Ha),1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,420,,,559.6388222,559.6388222,420,559.6388222,559.6388222,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,herbicide use,Phillip Haubrock,
SC150,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Tennessee,Tennessee Valley,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,431,,,282407.8835,282407.8835,225000,282407.8835,282407.8835,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"TVA currently spends about $225,000 annually on zebra mussel control
(Brodie, 2005).",Elena Manfrini/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
SC156,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,jan 2020 june 2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,500,,,566.1386264,739.9672065,500,566.1386264,739.9672065,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC167,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Tennessee,Nashville,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,574,,,720.4538895,720.4538895,574,720.4538895,720.4538895,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,thermal treatment,Elena Manfrini/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
SC172,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,Gum arabic tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,2006,2010,2006,2010,One-time,600,,,709.3182011,1653.409083,120,141.8636402,330.6818165,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""unfinished and abandoned"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC173,,Hedge2003,"A review of Spartina management in Washington State, US",Hedge P Kriwoken LK Patten K,"Management of non-native Spartinaplants including Spar-tina  alterniflora  Lois.,Spartina  anglica  C.  HubbandSpartinapatens (Ait.) Muhl. in Washington State, U.S. evolved duringthe 1990s from small-scale field trials to a large-scale integrat-ed pest management program. The development and imple-mentation  of  the  program  were  significantly  hindered  bystakeholder conflict, particularly regarding the use of herbi-cide  in  estuarine  environments.  In  1995,  Washington  StateDepartment  of  Agriculture  was  appointed  to  manage  theseinvasive  species.  Agency  coordination  and  strategy  reviewswere  undertaken.  A  wide  range  of  control  techniques,  in-cluding physical removal, mowing and herbicide, were estab-lished,   with   all   techniques   demonstrating   considerablelimitations. The combination of mowing and herbicide pro-vided  the  greatest  efficacy  but  was  expensive.  Developmentof biological control options is in progress but will take yearsto  prove  effectiveness  for  Spartinamanagement.  Programprogress based on existing mapping and efficacy data is diffi-cult  to  gauge.  This  program  demonstrates  that  Spartinaplants are difficult and expensive to eradicate. Between 1995and  2000,  infestations  increased  in  area  by  250%,  affectingmore than 8,093 ha of intertidal land. During this period, ap-proximately 15% of the infestation was treated annually. Al-though  the  program  has  evolved  considerably,  substantiallyincreasing knowledge on the management of Spartina, infes-tations  in  Washington  State  continue  to  present  a  range  ofmanagement  challenges,  including  the  development  of  astandardized and integrated mapping procedures, cost-effec-tive  control  techniques  and  improvements  to  stakeholdermanagement.",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus cynosuroides,,Spartina,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,12a,N,North America,USA,,Washington,Unit (Ha),2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,600,,,799.4840317,799.4840317,600,799.4840317,799.4840317,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,lternative herbicides for Spartinacontrol in Washington,Phillip Haubrock,
SC177,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,Palay rubbervine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,2006,2010,2006,2010,Potentially ongoing,650,,,768.4280512,1791.193173,130,153.6856102,358.2386345,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""Almost eradicated"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC183,,Critchley1986,"An account of the attempted control of an introduced marine alga, Sargassum muticum, in Southern England","Critchley, A. T., Farnham, W. F., Morrell, S. L.","This paper details the attempted eradication and clearance programme for the introduced brown seaweed Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt. Since the introduction of this alga to British coastal waters in the early 1970s, populations have increased rapidly, causing a number of recreational and ecological problems. Various methods including handpicking, herbicides and biological control to combat the spread of the weed have been unsuccessful. Mechanical clearance, a costly alternative, has proved to be a viable proposition; the stages in the development of a working system are presented here.",1986,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Fucales,Sargassaceae,Sargassum,Sargassum muticum,,Japanese wireweed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Aquatic,11,Y,Europe,United Kingdom,England,South Coast Of England,Unit (3000m^2),1976 - 1981 over 5 months April - June,Period,1976,1981,1976,1981,Potentially ongoing,720,720,867,5572.65039,7950.742289,120,928.775065,1325.123715,GBP,1976,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost claculated based on cost per area and weight. Additionally contains numbers of volounteers not included in costs.,Angela Bartlett,No
SC186,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,770,,,936.259332,1758.93776,770,936.259332,1758.93776,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for the physical removal of weeds in dense stands over 85 man days (mechanical control),Desika Moodley,
SC194,,Borrel2011,Chemical control of invasive Psidium guajava in Swaziland: A preliminary assessment of costs and efficacy,"Borrel, A.J., Brown, L.R., Slater, K.","Psidium guajava (guava) is recognised as the third most important invasive alien plant species in the
moist savanna biome of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. The cost of initial clearing of alien plants
reaches up to R3 000-00 per ha, therefore the application of correct control methods is essential for
cost-effective reduction of the spread. The aim of this study was to test the cost effectiveness of
applying various herbicides to guava in the Swaziland Sour Bushveld. Four plots were selected for
standing plant treatments, five for cut stump treatments and two for controls. Within each of these
plots, five sub-plots were randomly located and the number of plant stems, base diameter, maximum
height, and crown diameter was recorded before application of the herbicides. Picloram, fluroxypyr,
bromacil, tebuthiuron and imazapyr were used either alone or in combinations. Eleven months after
herbicide application, the treated plants were measured again. Bromacil/tebuthiuron liquid soil
application gave the best results in terms of cost (0.09 c/stem) for standing plant treatments. The
picloram/fluroxypyr cut stump treatment (4.5% concentration) cost the least to apply (0.05 c/stem), and
no resprouting was observed. Results from this study can be used as baseline figures for managers
planning to control guava.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Psidium,Psidium guajava,,Guava,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,Swaziland,,Upper Middleveld,Unit (1 ha),2008-2009,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,One-time,897,,,123.6166634,300.222198,897,123.6166634,300.222198,ZAR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Bromacil/tebuthiuron liquid soil (18%) - standing plants. Cost per hectare, combining herbicide and labour costs.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC198,,Borrel2011,Chemical control of invasive Psidium guajava in Swaziland: A preliminary assessment of costs and efficacy,"Borrel, A.J., Brown, L.R., Slater, K.","Psidium guajava (guava) is recognised as the third most important invasive alien plant species in the
moist savanna biome of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. The cost of initial clearing of alien plants
reaches up to R3 000-00 per ha, therefore the application of correct control methods is essential for
cost-effective reduction of the spread. The aim of this study was to test the cost effectiveness of
applying various herbicides to guava in the Swaziland Sour Bushveld. Four plots were selected for
standing plant treatments, five for cut stump treatments and two for controls. Within each of these
plots, five sub-plots were randomly located and the number of plant stems, base diameter, maximum
height, and crown diameter was recorded before application of the herbicides. Picloram, fluroxypyr,
bromacil, tebuthiuron and imazapyr were used either alone or in combinations. Eleven months after
herbicide application, the treated plants were measured again. Bromacil/tebuthiuron liquid soil
application gave the best results in terms of cost (0.09 c/stem) for standing plant treatments. The
picloram/fluroxypyr cut stump treatment (4.5% concentration) cost the least to apply (0.05 c/stem), and
no resprouting was observed. Results from this study can be used as baseline figures for managers
planning to control guava.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Psidium,Psidium guajava,,Guava,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,Swaziland,,Upper Middleveld,Unit (1 ha),2008-2009,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,One-time,978,,,134.7793721,327.3325637,978,134.7793721,327.3325637,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Imazapyr (12.5%) - cut stump. Cost per hectare, combining herbicide and labour costs.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC208,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Panicum,Panicum repens,,Torpedograss,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1593.610827,1590.117026,90.90909091,144.8737116,144.5560932,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa,No
SC209,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,Pieterse et al. 2003,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Senegal,,Senegal,Country,2000,Period,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,1000,,,1423.458672,4529.381528,1000,1423.458672,4529.381528,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of manual labour,Desika Moodley,
SC210,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,Pieterse et al. 2003,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Senegal/Mauritania,,Senegal/Mauritania,Unit (70km),2000,Period,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,1000,,,1423.458672,,1000,1423.458672,,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs of biological management of Salvinia,Desika Moodley,
SC211,,Vogele1991,Biological control of the fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams in Togo: A preliminary sociological and economic evaluation,"Vögele, J.M., Agounke, D., Moore, D.","The fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams, accidentally introduced into the West African region in the early 1980s, has been the subject of a successful biological control programme in Togo and elsewhere in West Africa. It is now kept at low population densities by the introduced specific parasitoid Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes. The sociological and economic impact of this successful biological control programme is evaluated. The economic assessment strongly suggests that the programme was very cost?effective. In addition, substantial non?quantifiable social and cultural benefits can be recorded.",1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Rastrococcus,Rastrococcus invadens,,Fruit tree mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Togo,,Togo,Country,1990,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,1000,,,1799.813376,3667.285447,1000,1799.813376,3667.285447,USD,1991,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"After 1990, only marginal monitoring costs occur per annum.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC216,,McConnachie2003,Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa,"McConnachie, A.J., de Wit, M.T., Hill, M.P., Byrne, M.J.","Azolla filiculoides (red waterfern) is a floating fern native to South America which has invaded aquatic ecosystems in South
Africa. Thick mats of A. filiculoides on dams and slow-moving water bodies cause economic losses to water-users. Affected waterusers
were surveyed using a questionnaire to assess the importance of the weed. Among those most seriously affected were farming
(71%), recreational (24%), and municipal (5%) users. The average water area covered by A. filiculoides (per water-user) was 2.17 ha,
with an expansion rate of 1.33 ha per year. The frond-feeding weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was released as a biological control agent
at the end of 1997. Within 3 years, the weevil had reduced the weed population to the point that it was no longer considered a
problem in South Africa. Based on year 2000 data, the cost savings (per user per hectare) resulting from the biological control
program included a reduction of on-site damages caused bythe weed to the value of US$589 per hectare per year. The average cost
per hectare per year for the biological control program for the period 1995–2000 amounted to US$278, excluding investment costs of
USD$7700 in 1995. These historic costs and benefits were adjusted to constant year 2000 values. The predicted spread of the weed
was calculated on the basis of a sigmoid-curve rate of spread model. The net present value (NPV) of the program was calculated
from 1995 onwards and discounted at 8%. This resulted in a NPV of US$1093 per hectare and US$206 million for South Africa as a
whole. For the year 2000, the benefit–cost ratio was calculated at 2.5:1, increasing rapidly to 13:1 in 2005, and 15:1 in 2010 as the
costs of the biological control program are expected to decrease. These indicators reinforce the overall economic viabilityof biological
control, but do not necessarilyconfirm the viabilityof biological control on each management unit itself. The results reflect
the dynamics of biological control on site-specific survey information, and place higher benefit–cost ratios achieved in other national
level studies in a better context. It also raises the important policyquestion of who is responsible to finance such control programs in
future, because on-site benefits of control are enough to justifythe program in its own right. The paper concludes with recommendations
on a financial mechanism to address biological control of invasive species in a sustainable manner.",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Red water fern,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2000,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,1038,,,1477.550102,3761.20741,1038,1477.550102,3761.20741,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"Summaryof costs of Azolla filiculoides accruing to water-users, as determined by questionnaire. Includes labour and herbicide costs per respondent (mean).",Ross Cuthbert,
SC223,,2,"The development of a biocontrol strategy for the management of the alien perennial weed, Mikania micrantha H.B.K (Asteraceae) in tree crop based farming systems in India","KFRI (India), CABI (UK)",,1999,English,Official report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Mikania,Mikania micrantha,,mile-a-minute weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Asia,India,,South India,Site,One-time,Period,1997,1999,1997,1999,One-time,1400,,,41.07260594,204.335804,466.6666667,13.69086865,68.11193465,INR,2001,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs for manual removal,Achyut Kumar,
SC225,,FLDEP2006,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report Fiscal Year 2005-2006,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2006,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Brachiaria,Brachiaria mutica,,Paragrass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,1404,,,1707.153379,1707.153379,1404,1707.153379,1707.153379,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC226,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea trichocephala,,featherhead knapweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,abandoned pasture,4,N,North America,USA,Washington,Abandoned Pasture,Unit (<1 ha),5 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2009,One-time,1408,,,1602.992874,1602.992874,281.6,320.5985749,320.5985749,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, citing Mack & Lonsdale 2002; used gross area (area treated + area searched)",Jennifer Bufford,
SC232,,Gaertner2012,"Plant invasions, restoration, and economics: Perspectives from South African fynbos","Gaertner, M., Nottebrock, H., Fourie, H., Privett, S.D., and Richardson, D.M.","Restoration is gaining importance in the management of plant invasions. As the success of restoration projects is frequently determined by factors other than ecological ones, we explored the ecological and financial feasibility of active restoration on three different invaded sites in South Africa’s Cape Floristic Region. The aim of our study was to identify cost-effective ways of restoring functional native ecosystems following invasion by alien plants. Over three years we evaluated different restoration approaches using field trials and experimental manipulations (i.e. mechanical clearing, burning, different soil restoration techniques and sowing of native species) to reduce elevated soil nutrient levels and to re-establish native fynbos communities. Furthermore we investigated the possibility of introducing native fynbos species that can be used for sustainable harvesting to create an incentive for restoration on private land. Diversity and evenness of native plant species increased significantly after restoration at all three sites, whereas cover of alien plants decreased significantly, confirming that active restoration was successful. However, sowing of native fynbos species had no significant effect on native cover, species richness, diversity or evenness in the Acacia thicket and Kikuyu field, implying that the ecosystem was sufficiently resilient to allow autogenic recovery following clearing and burning of the invasive species. Soil restoration treatments resulted in an increase of available nitrogen in the Acacia thicket, but had no significant effects in the Eucalyptus plantation. However, despite elevated available soil nitrogen levels, native species germinated irrespective whether sown or unsown (i.e. regeneration from the soil seed bank). Without active introduction of native species, native grasses, forbs and other shrubs would have dominated, and proteoids and ericoids (the major fynbos growth forms) would have been under-represented. The financial analysis shows that income from flower harvesting following active restoration consistently outweighs income following passive restoration, but that the associated increase in income does not always justify the higher costs. We conclude that active restoration can be effective and financially feasible when compared to passive restoration, depending on the density of invasion. Active restoration of densely invaded sites may therefore only be justifiable if the target area is in a region of high conservation priority.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,Kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Agulhas Plain,Unit (840 m2),2007-2010,Period,2007,2010,2007,2010,One-time,1578,,,205.20273,341.6180235,394.5,51.3006825,85.40450587,ZAR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Clearing and passive restoration costs per ha,Desika Moodley,
SC233,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Pueraria,Pueraria phaseoloides,,Tropical kudzu,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,1996,2001,1996,2001,One-time,1600,,,1891.515203,4409.090887,266.6666667,315.2525338,734.8484811,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome was successfully eradicated. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC234,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Alopochen,Alopochen aegyptiaca,,Egyptian goose,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,arable fields,12b,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1613,,,2801.693892,2581.804074,1613,2801.693892,2581.804074,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp80: cost of controlling (harassing) Egyptian geese in arable fields. Cost given for England only, but all resident barancle geese in GB are in England, so this estimate also reflects cost for whole GB (England/Scotland/Wales).",Nigel Taylor,No
SC236,,FLDEP2006,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report Fiscal Year 2005-2006,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2006,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum tampicense,,Aquatic nightshade,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,1661,,,2019.64513,2019.64513,1661,2019.64513,2019.64513,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC238,,Back2008,"Long-term Spread and Control of Invasive, Common Reed (Phragmites australis) in Sheldon Marsh, Lake Erie NORTH-AMERICA, TYPHA-ANGUSTIFOLIA, FRESH-WATER, HERBICIDE, TEMPERATE, ABUNDANCE, SPARTINA, WETLANDS, GROWTH, STANDS In 2001 the Ohio Departm",Back CL Holomuzki JR,"In 2001 the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) initiated a long-term, herbicide-spraying control program of Phragmites australis (common reed), a highly invasive perennial grass, in Sheldon Marsh on Lake Erie’s south shoreline. Controlling reed is a priority of many wetland managers because habitat homogenization from reed expansion may adversely aff ect wildlife habitat and waterfowl. Reed has historically been a minor part of wetland plant communities of the Laurentian Great Lakes but has spread rapidly since 2000 when lake water levels dropped. Here we examined ODNR records and aerial photographs using ArcGIS so— ware and planimetry from 2000 to 2007 to (1) track annual changes in reed localities and areal coverage, (2) compare short-term eff ectiveness of glyphosate (Glypro® and AquaNeat®) and imazapyr (Habitat®) herbicides, and (3) estimate control costs. Reed › rst appeared in a small, isolated patch in 1998 but expanded to comprise approximately 18 percent of the marsh’s emergent vegetation by 2001. Annual change in areal cover was not related to minor changes in already low Lake Erie water levels. However, reed amount decreased from 6.7 ha (= 14.8 percent of emergent vegetation) in 2004 to 2.5 ha in 2007 a— er a two- to three-fold annual increase in amount of herbicide used.  Short-term, post-spraying necrosis (browning) was slower for Phragmites treated with a › ve percent Habitat® solution than with a 30 percent AquaNeat® solution. Slowed necrosis presumably prolongs photosynthesis and plant nutrient uptake and delays habitat deterioration for some wildlife, but provides time for vegetative spread. Seven years of herbiciding have contained reed to approximately six percent of the emergent plant cover. Estimated control expenditures from 2003 to 2007 were $8475 USD (average approximately $1700/year); a small cost to maintain system ecological diversity.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,Common reed,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,10,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Unit (Lake),2008,Period,2003,2008,2003,2008,Potentially ongoing,1700,,,1935.431738,1935.431738,283.3333333,322.5719563,322.5719563,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control costs,Phillip Haubrock,
SC239,,FLDEP2007,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2007,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Giant salvinia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,1730,,,2045.200813,2045.200813,1730,2045.200813,2045.200813,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC241,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Pueraria,Pueraria phaseoloides,,tropical kudzu,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,sown in pasture,4b,Y,South America,Ireland,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz Island,Unit (0.04 ha),6 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2004,2009,One-time,1770,,,2015.125986,4206.15335,295,335.8543309,701.0255584,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Tye 2007",Jennifer Bufford,
SC243,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,1800,,,2038.099055,2663.881943,1800,2038.099055,2663.881943,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC250,,2,"The development of a biocontrol strategy for the management of the alien perennial weed, Mikania micrantha H.B.K (Asteraceae) in tree crop based farming systems in India","KFRI (India), CABI (UK)",,1999,English,Official report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Mikania,Mikania micrantha,,mile-a-minute weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Asia,India,,South India,Site,One-time,Period,1997,1999,1997,1999,One-time,1938.5,,,66.25308095,307.9486448,646.1666667,22.08436032,102.6495483,INR,1999,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Health/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Costs for manual removal,Achyut Kumar,
SC253,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Proteales,Proteaceae,Hakea,Hakea sericea,,Silky hakea/Needlebush,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,2000,,,3187.221655,3180.234051,181.8181818,289.7474232,289.1121865,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa,No
SC254,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Sapindaceae,Sapindus,Sapindus saponaria,,Wingleaf soapberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santiago,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2002,2007,2002,2007,One-time,2000,,,2364.394004,5511.363608,333.3333333,394.0656673,918.5606014,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered successfully  eradicated and the costs include the total eradicated costs. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC255,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Laurales,Lauraceae,Persea,Persea americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santiago,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,2000,,,2364.394004,5511.363608,285.7142857,337.7705719,787.3376583,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""Eradicated 2008, confirmed 2013"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC256,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2000,,,2264.554505,2959.868826,2000,2264.554505,2959.868826,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC264,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2200,,,2491.009956,3255.855709,2200,2491.009956,3255.855709,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC265,,FLDEP2007,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2007,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Wild taro,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,2202,,,2603.197798,2603.197798,2202,2603.197798,2603.197798,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC266,,Borrel2011,Chemical control of invasive Psidium guajava in Swaziland: A preliminary assessment of costs and efficacy,"Borrel, A.J., Brown, L.R., Slater, K.","Psidium guajava (guava) is recognised as the third most important invasive alien plant species in the
moist savanna biome of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. The cost of initial clearing of alien plants
reaches up to R3 000-00 per ha, therefore the application of correct control methods is essential for
cost-effective reduction of the spread. The aim of this study was to test the cost effectiveness of
applying various herbicides to guava in the Swaziland Sour Bushveld. Four plots were selected for
standing plant treatments, five for cut stump treatments and two for controls. Within each of these
plots, five sub-plots were randomly located and the number of plant stems, base diameter, maximum
height, and crown diameter was recorded before application of the herbicides. Picloram, fluroxypyr,
bromacil, tebuthiuron and imazapyr were used either alone or in combinations. Eleven months after
herbicide application, the treated plants were measured again. Bromacil/tebuthiuron liquid soil
application gave the best results in terms of cost (0.09 c/stem) for standing plant treatments. The
picloram/fluroxypyr cut stump treatment (4.5% concentration) cost the least to apply (0.05 c/stem), and
no resprouting was observed. Results from this study can be used as baseline figures for managers
planning to control guava.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Psidium,Psidium guajava,,Guava,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,Swaziland,,Upper Middleveld,Unit (1 ha),2008-2009,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,One-time,2302,,,317.241426,770.4698994,2302,317.241426,770.4698994,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Tebuthiuron granular soil - standing plants. Cost per hectare, combining herbicide and labour costs.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC268,,Borrel2011,Chemical control of invasive Psidium guajava in Swaziland: A preliminary assessment of costs and efficacy,"Borrel, A.J., Brown, L.R., Slater, K.","Psidium guajava (guava) is recognised as the third most important invasive alien plant species in the
moist savanna biome of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. The cost of initial clearing of alien plants
reaches up to R3 000-00 per ha, therefore the application of correct control methods is essential for
cost-effective reduction of the spread. The aim of this study was to test the cost effectiveness of
applying various herbicides to guava in the Swaziland Sour Bushveld. Four plots were selected for
standing plant treatments, five for cut stump treatments and two for controls. Within each of these
plots, five sub-plots were randomly located and the number of plant stems, base diameter, maximum
height, and crown diameter was recorded before application of the herbicides. Picloram, fluroxypyr,
bromacil, tebuthiuron and imazapyr were used either alone or in combinations. Eleven months after
herbicide application, the treated plants were measured again. Bromacil/tebuthiuron liquid soil
application gave the best results in terms of cost (0.09 c/stem) for standing plant treatments. The
picloram/fluroxypyr cut stump treatment (4.5% concentration) cost the least to apply (0.05 c/stem), and
no resprouting was observed. Results from this study can be used as baseline figures for managers
planning to control guava.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Psidium,Psidium guajava,,Guava,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,Swaziland,,Upper Middleveld,Unit (1 ha),2008-2009,Year,2008,2009,2008,2009,One-time,2322,,,319.9976503,777.1638168,2322,319.9976503,777.1638168,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Picloram/fluroxypyr foliar spray (1.5%) + Adjuvant (0.5%) - standing plants. Cost per hectare, combining herbicide and labour costs.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC271,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2500,,,2830.693132,3699.836032,2500,2830.693132,3699.836032,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC272,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,1999,2004,1999,2004,One-time,2549,,,3013.420158,7024.232919,424.8333333,502.2366929,1170.705486,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome was succesful eradication in 2004. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC273,,Gaertner2012,"Plant invasions, restoration, and economics: Perspectives from South African fynbos","Gaertner, M., Nottebrock, H., Fourie, H., Privett, S.D., and Richardson, D.M.","Restoration is gaining importance in the management of plant invasions. As the success of restoration projects is frequently determined by factors other than ecological ones, we explored the ecological and financial feasibility of active restoration on three different invaded sites in South Africa’s Cape Floristic Region. The aim of our study was to identify cost-effective ways of restoring functional native ecosystems following invasion by alien plants. Over three years we evaluated different restoration approaches using field trials and experimental manipulations (i.e. mechanical clearing, burning, different soil restoration techniques and sowing of native species) to reduce elevated soil nutrient levels and to re-establish native fynbos communities. Furthermore we investigated the possibility of introducing native fynbos species that can be used for sustainable harvesting to create an incentive for restoration on private land. Diversity and evenness of native plant species increased significantly after restoration at all three sites, whereas cover of alien plants decreased significantly, confirming that active restoration was successful. However, sowing of native fynbos species had no significant effect on native cover, species richness, diversity or evenness in the Acacia thicket and Kikuyu field, implying that the ecosystem was sufficiently resilient to allow autogenic recovery following clearing and burning of the invasive species. Soil restoration treatments resulted in an increase of available nitrogen in the Acacia thicket, but had no significant effects in the Eucalyptus plantation. However, despite elevated available soil nitrogen levels, native species germinated irrespective whether sown or unsown (i.e. regeneration from the soil seed bank). Without active introduction of native species, native grasses, forbs and other shrubs would have dominated, and proteoids and ericoids (the major fynbos growth forms) would have been under-represented. The financial analysis shows that income from flower harvesting following active restoration consistently outweighs income following passive restoration, but that the associated increase in income does not always justify the higher costs. We conclude that active restoration can be effective and financially feasible when compared to passive restoration, depending on the density of invasion. Active restoration of densely invaded sites may therefore only be justifiable if the target area is in a region of high conservation priority.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus clandestinus,,Kikuyu grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Agulhas Plain,Unit (840 m2),2007-2010,Period,2007,2010,2007,2010,One-time,2558,,,332.6416878,553.7762383,639.5,83.16042195,138.4440596,ZAR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Clearing and active restoration costs per ha,Desika Moodley,
SC278,TC,SP_57,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Comunidad Autonoma de la region de Murcia. Direccion General del Medio Natural. Servicio de Biodiversidad Caza y Pesca Fluvial,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Ammotragus,Ammotragus lervia,,Arrui,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Sierra Espuña And Surroundings,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,2994.95,,,3452.567863,4512.652693,2994.95,3452.567863,4512.652693,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection/Monitoring,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Seguimiento poblaciones arrui. The costs refers to a public tender,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC279,TC,SP_57,Respuesta a la solicitud de informacion de Elena Angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biologicas INVACOST,Comunidad Autonoma de la region de Murcia. Direccion General del Medio Natural. Servicio de Biodiversidad Caza y Pesca Fluvial,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Ammotragus,Ammotragus lervia,,Arrui,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Sierra Espuña And Surroundings,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,2994.95,,,3385.735169,4666.228934,2994.95,3385.735169,4666.228934,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection/Monitoring,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs corresponds to poopulation census,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC280,TC,SP_57,Respuesta a la solicitud de informacion de Elena Angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biologicas INVACOST,Comunidad Autonoma de la region de Murcia. Direccion General del Medio Natural. Servicio de Biodiversidad Caza y Pesca Fluvial,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Ammotragus,Ammotragus lervia,,Arrui,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Sierra Espuña And Surroundings,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,2994.95,,,3383.338639,4670.633002,2994.95,3383.338639,4670.633002,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection/Monitoring,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs corresponds to poopulation census,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC281,TC,SP_57,Respuesta a la solicitud de informacion de Elena Angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biologicas INVACOST,Comunidad Autonoma de la region de Murcia. Direccion General del Medio Natural. Servicio de Biodiversidad Caza y Pesca Fluvial,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Ammotragus,Ammotragus lervia,,Arrui,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Sierra Espuña And Surroundings,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,2994.95,,,3391.113758,4432.32957,2994.95,3391.113758,4432.32957,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection/Monitoring,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs corresponds to poopulation census,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC282,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Chikwenhere and Keswani, 
1997",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Zimbabwe,,Zimbabwe,Unit (16 ha),1989,Period,1989,1989,1989,1989,One-time,3000,,,2796301.504,,3000,2796301.504,,ZWL,1989,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of 400 man-days of manual labour,Desika Moodley,
SC283,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,3000,,,3396.831758,4439.803239,3000,3396.831758,4439.803239,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC286,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Tennessee,Cheatham,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,2005,2005,One-time,3075,,,72777.13915,72777.13915,57983,72777.13915,72777.13915,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,unit for chlorine injection to control zebraas in cheatham dam,Elena Manfrini,
SC288,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Vitoria,Country,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,3200,,,4401.748168,5002.302319,3200,4401.748168,5002.302319,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC292,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,3425,,,1518.949666,2720.443797,3425,1518.949666,2720.443797,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC293,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,3500,,,3962.970384,5179.770445,3500,3962.970384,5179.770445,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC295,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Alava,Country,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,3540,,,4855.70835,5438.148814,3540,4855.70835,5438.148814,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC296,,Oregon2000,"Economic Analysis of Containment Programs,
Damages, and Production Losses From Noxious Weeds in Oregon","Oregon Department of Agriculture, Plant Division, Noxious Weed Control Program",,2000,English,Official report,Oregon2014,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea calcitrapa,,purple starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Oregon,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,3558,,,5064.665955,5064.665955,3558,5064.665955,5064.665955,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC297,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,One-time,3575.19,,,1585.557272,2839.738237,3575.19,1585.557272,2839.738237,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC301,,FLDEP2006,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report Fiscal Year 2005-2006,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2006,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Panicum,Panicum repens,,Torpedograss,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,3709,,,4509.851769,4509.851769,3709,4509.851769,4509.851769,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC306,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1989,Year,1989,1989,1989,1989,One-time,3945,,,1749.563922,3133.474681,3945,1749.563922,3133.474681,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC307,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Vitoria,Country,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,3990,,,5946.132414,6169.645378,3990,5946.132414,6169.645378,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC311,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,4000,,,4529.109011,5919.737652,4000,4529.109011,5919.737652,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC312,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,4000,,,4529.109011,5919.737652,4000,4529.109011,5919.737652,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC317,,Yanez2002,"Plan para la erradicación de la ""zaragoza"" Aristolochia odoratissima L. (Aristolochiaceae) en la Isla Santa Cruz, Galápagos","Yánez, P. and Buddenhagen, C.","La erradicación de especies invasivas de islas individuales o del archipiélago entero es un componente clave de cualquier estrategia efectiva que busque mitigar los impactos de especies invasivas em Galápagos. La erradicación de tales especies debería ser intentada cada vez que sea factible hacerlo. Aristolochia odoratissima es una especie trepadora invasiva y potencialmente peligrosa que fue introducida a Galápagos probablemente hacia mediados o finales del Siglo XX, y cuyo primer registro sistemático data de 1999 (Base de Datos del Herbario CDRS 2002). Un Plan de Manejo para esta especie se describe en el presente documento, el cual incluye métodos de control y la frecuencia deseable de efectuar tal control al igual que búsquedas posteriores de infestaciones, así como técnicas de monitorear la efectividad de los métodos de control a lo largo de un lapso determinado. Sobre la base de la distribución conocida de A. odoratissima y sus características en Galápagos pareciera ser efectivamente erradicable dentro de un período de 8-9 años por un costo total de entre US$190.000,oo a US$200.000,oo (incluyendo búsquedas posterradicación).",2002,English,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia odoratissima,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Areas agricolas,12b,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos",Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,4126,,,5622.590137,16434.49737,4126,5622.590137,16434.49737,USD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"There is a estimation for costs between 2003 and 2014, but its not clear in the file. Therefore, I did not added in the database.",Gustavo Heringer,
SC321,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Jatropha,Jatropha curcas,,Physic nut,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,planted,12,N,Oceania,Australia,Northern Territory,Mt Wells Battery,Unit (0.25 ha),5 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2005,2009,One-time,4418,,,5029.845539,4054.210219,883.6,1005.969108,810.8420439,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Miller pers comm",Jennifer Bufford,
SC322,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,4464,,,1979.734689,3545.711273,4464,1979.734689,3545.711273,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC323,TC,SP_63,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Navarra,Navarra Autonomous Region,Unit (1km river),2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,Potentially ongoing,4476.66,,,5068.820286,6625.163189,4476.66,5068.820286,6625.163189,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Extracción de visón americano mediante la colocación de plataformas trampa (1 trampa por km de río) (i) 1 trampa por Km de río  (ii) revisión anual de estas plataformas durante 4 meses al año con una periodicidad de 1 vez por semana (340€/jord). Esta estimación puede variar bastante al alza si al empezar el control  y ver los resultados se ve que hay que hacer muchas más visitas a las plataformas.,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC325,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Chikwenhere and Keswani, 
1997",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Zimbabwe,,Zimbabwe,Unit (16 ha),1990,Period,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,4565,,,3489115.887,18610.50179,4565,3489115.887,18610.50179,ZWL,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of control (floating barriers were erected + dry biomass was burnt),Desika Moodley,
SC330,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Alava,Country,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,4786.08,,,7259.691332,7303.250747,4786.08,7259.691332,7303.250747,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC331,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,4800,,,2128.746978,3812.592767,4800,2128.746978,3812.592767,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC336,,Frid2009,Economic impacts of invasive plants in British Columbia,"Frid, L, Knowler, D, Murray, C, Myers, J, Scott, L",NA,2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,mesotrophic lakes,11,N,North America,Canada,British Columbia,British Columbia,Unit (ha),one-time repeat annually,Year,1980,2009,1980,2009,Potentially ongoing,5000,,,5359.575368,5042.575241,5000,5359.575368,5042.575241,CAD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"average yearly cost of managing milfoil in the Okanagan lakes through rototilling and manual harvesting; budget was known from recent years, but area treated had to be estimated",Jennifer Bufford,
SC339,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1987,Year,1987,1987,1987,1987,One-time,5089,,,2256.915285,4042.142623,5089,2256.915285,4042.142623,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC344,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Central African Republic,,Mossapoula River,Unit (100 ha),2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,5430,,,6602.452172,14743.35848,5430,6602.452172,14743.35848,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs for biological control (i.e. rearing of beetles; equipment; labour for implementing and monitoring),Desika Moodley,
SC345,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus megalococcus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,2000,2005,2000,2005,One-time,5436,,,6426.422902,14979.88629,906,1071.070484,2496.647715,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome was succesful eradication in 2005. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC350,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,pasture,4b,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz Island,Unit (41 ha),6 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2004,2009,One-time,5725,,,6517.850998,13604.64855,954.1666667,1086.3085,2267.441425,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Buddenhagen 2006",Jennifer Bufford,
SC351,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,One-time,5743.19,,,2547.041324,4561.759303,5743.19,2547.041324,4561.759303,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC353,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Onopordum,Onopordum acanthium,,Scotch thistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,6000,,,6405.733747,6405.733747,6000,6405.733747,6405.733747,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC354,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Fallopia,Fallopia baldschuanica,,Silver lace vine/Bukhara fleeceflower/Russian vine/Silver lace vine/Chinese fleece vine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,6000,,,9561.664965,9540.702154,545.4545455,869.2422695,867.3365594,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa,No
SC355,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Pittosporaceae,Pittosporum,Pittosporum tobira,,Austrian laurel/Japanese Pittosporum/Mockorange/Mock Orange/Pittosporum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,6000,,,9561.664965,9540.702154,545.4545455,869.2422695,867.3365594,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa,No
SC356,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Isabela,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2001,2010,2001,2010,Potentially ongoing,6000,,,7093.182011,16534.09083,600,709.3182011,1653.409083,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""Single site, no seed production; eradication recommendations not implemented"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC360,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Fucales,Sargassaceae,Sargassum,Sargassum muticum,,wireweed,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Wales,Site,4 years,Period,2010,Unspecified,2010,2013,One-time,6000,,,10421.67598,9603.734931,1500,2605.418994,2400.933733,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.8 Countryside Council for Wales Funding: Sargassum muticum,Nigel Taylor,No
SC361,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1995,Year,1995,1995,1995,1995,One-time,6045.92,,,2681.298735,4802.214763,6045.92,2681.298735,4802.214763,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC363,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,6054,,,10515.47106,9690.168545,6054,10515.47106,9690.168545,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Brown rats impact on Manx shearwater.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC364,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1986,Year,1986,1986,1986,1986,One-time,6079,,,2695.96935,4828.489882,6079,2695.96935,4828.489882,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC365,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,6200.44,,,2749.826648,4924.948479,6200.44,2749.826648,4924.948479,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC366,,2,"The development of a biocontrol strategy for the management of the alien perennial weed, Mikania micrantha H.B.K (Asteraceae) in tree crop based farming systems in India","KFRI (India), CABI (UK)",,1999,English,Official report,NA,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Mikania,Mikania micrantha,,mile-a-minute weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Asia,India,,South India,Site,One-time,Period,1997,1999,1997,1999,One-time,6274,,,198.7196432,951.0143428,2091.333333,66.23988105,317.0047809,INR,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Health/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Costs for manual removal,Achyut Kumar,
SC367,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Chikwenhere and Keswani, 1997",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Zimbabwe,,Zimbabwe,Unit (16 ha),1992,Year,1992,1993,1992,1993,One-time,6385,,,2185225.735,32016.3027,6385,2185225.735,32016.3027,ZWL,1992,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs of biological management of Salvinia,Desika Moodley,
SC369,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Cantabria,Cantabria Autonomous Region,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,6394.85,,,7371.960667,9635.465392,6394.85,7371.960667,9635.465392,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink in CANTABRIA,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC370,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrografica Del Tajo,Unit (River Basin),2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,6437.2,,,10258.39162,10235.90132,6437.2,10258.39162,10235.90132,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation. These costs relate to the instalation of posters with information about the risks of the invader. Project Life INVASEP",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC371,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrografica Del Tajo,Unit (River Basin),2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,6437.2,,,8995.716655,10037.46441,6437.2,8995.716655,10037.46441,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation. These costs relate to the instalation of posters with information about the risks of the invader. Project Life INVASEP",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC372,,FLDEP2007,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2007,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Hymenachne,Hymenachne amplexicaulis,,West Indian marsh grass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,6470,,,7648.814602,7648.814602,6470,7648.814602,7648.814602,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC374,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus megalococcus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,pasture,4b,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz Island,Unit (103 ha),6 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2004,2009,One-time,6616,,,7532.244927,15721.98337,1102.666667,1255.374154,2620.330562,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Buddenhagen 2006",Jennifer Bufford,
SC375,TC,SP_63,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Carex strigosa,,Carex strigosa,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Navarra,Zec Bidasoa River/natural Reserve San Juan Xar,Site,12 years,Period,2008,2020,2008,2020,One-time,6788.1,,,7686.011219,10045.94279,522.1615385,591.2316322,772.7648299,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC379,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1985,Year,1985,1985,1985,1985,One-time,7117,,,3156.310884,5652.963068,7117,3156.310884,5652.963068,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC382,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,Beach-dune,5,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Parque Natural Complexo Dunar De Corrubedo E Lagoas De Carregal E Vixan,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,7260,,,8207.294723,11311.31473,7260,8207.294723,11311.31473,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 20 % Autonomous region, 80% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC385,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Ascidiacea,Aplousobranchia,Didemnidae,Didemnum,Didemnum vexillum,,compound sea squirt,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,1 year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,7469,,,12973.24964,11955.04937,7469,12973.24964,11955.04937,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Didemnum vexillum survey.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC386,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1984,Year,1984,1984,1984,1984,One-time,7692,,,3411.317032,6109.679909,7692,3411.317032,6109.679909,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC387,,McConnachie2003,Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa,"McConnachie, A.J., de Wit, M.T., Hill, M.P., Byrne, M.J.","Azolla filiculoides (red waterfern) is a floating fern native to South America which has invaded aquatic ecosystems in South
Africa. Thick mats of A. filiculoides on dams and slow-moving water bodies cause economic losses to water-users. Affected waterusers
were surveyed using a questionnaire to assess the importance of the weed. Among those most seriously affected were farming
(71%), recreational (24%), and municipal (5%) users. The average water area covered by A. filiculoides (per water-user) was 2.17 ha,
with an expansion rate of 1.33 ha per year. The frond-feeding weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was released as a biological control agent
at the end of 1997. Within 3 years, the weevil had reduced the weed population to the point that it was no longer considered a
problem in South Africa. Based on year 2000 data, the cost savings (per user per hectare) resulting from the biological control
program included a reduction of on-site damages caused bythe weed to the value of US$589 per hectare per year. The average cost
per hectare per year for the biological control program for the period 1995–2000 amounted to US$278, excluding investment costs of
USD$7700 in 1995. These historic costs and benefits were adjusted to constant year 2000 values. The predicted spread of the weed
was calculated on the basis of a sigmoid-curve rate of spread model. The net present value (NPV) of the program was calculated
from 1995 onwards and discounted at 8%. This resulted in a NPV of US$1093 per hectare and US$206 million for South Africa as a
whole. For the year 2000, the benefit–cost ratio was calculated at 2.5:1, increasing rapidly to 13:1 in 2005, and 15:1 in 2010 as the
costs of the biological control program are expected to decrease. These indicators reinforce the overall economic viabilityof biological
control, but do not necessarilyconfirm the viabilityof biological control on each management unit itself. The results reflect
the dynamics of biological control on site-specific survey information, and place higher benefit–cost ratios achieved in other national
level studies in a better context. It also raises the important policyquestion of who is responsible to finance such control programs in
future, because on-site benefits of control are enough to justifythe program in its own right. The paper concludes with recommendations
on a financial mechanism to address biological control of invasive species in a sustainable manner.",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Red water fern,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2000,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,7940,,,11302.26186,28770.70023,7940,11302.26186,28770.70023,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,"Summaryof costs of Azolla filiculoides accruing to water-users, as determined by questionnaire. Includes damages to livestock, pumps and construction of new water facilities per respondent (mean).",Ross Cuthbert,
SC388,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Onopordum,Onopordum acanthium,,Scotch thistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,8000,,,8540.978329,8540.978329,8000,8540.978329,8540.978329,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC391,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,8280.62,,,3672.3635,6577.214983,8280.62,3672.3635,6577.214983,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC393,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1983,Year,1983,1983,1983,1983,One-time,8511,,,3774.534485,6760.20355,8511,3774.534485,6760.20355,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC396,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,waterhyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,aquatic,11,N,Oceania,Australia,Northern Territory,"Regional, Nt",Unit (2.354 ha),7 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2003,2009,One-time,8976,,,10219.07957,8236.892469,1282.285714,1459.868511,1176.698924,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Miller pers comm",Jennifer Bufford,
SC397,,1,"Management of Lantana, an invasive alien weed, in forest ecosystems of India","Love A, Babu S, Babu C R",,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,1,N,Asia,India,,Unspecified,Country,One-time,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,9000,,,212.4348179,791.9330234,9000,212.4348179,791.9330234,INR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control/Damage repair,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Removal by cut rootstock method; estimate per hectare,Achyut Kumar,
SC398,TC,SP_60,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Aitor, Uriarte Bautista, Servicio de Patrimonio Natural /Diputación Foral de Bizkaia",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River estuary,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Zec Ria De Barbadun,Site,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,9000,,,10190.49527,13319.40972,9000,10190.49527,13319.40972,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimation obtained from cost of daily individual work (jornal/persona) = 216€/day. Daily indiv work is defined by: Jornal= jornada de trabajo diaria de un operario dedicado a labores de localización, y eliminación manual, o con herramienta manual, de plantas invasoras. It includes an economic estimation of work made by voluntary people that is free , but should be valorised.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC399,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Pais Vasco,Vitoria,Country,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,9000,,,12345.02123,13825.80207,9000,12345.02123,13825.80207,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC401,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,9317.99,,,4132.425636,7401.187766,9317.99,4132.425636,7401.187766,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC402,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja Autonomous Region,Country,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,9468.4,,,13231.69135,14763.98558,9468.4,13231.69135,14763.98558,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink in LA RIOJA 2013,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC403,,5,Biocontrol holds back an unwelcome guest: tackling the menace of Rugose Spiralling Whitefly in Coconut,"Selvaraj K, Sumalatha B V, Ramanujam B, Pornesha B, Venkatesan T, Shylesha A N, Gupta A, Ramya R S, Ballal C R",,2020,English,Official report,NA,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Aleurodicus,Aleurodicus rugioperculatus,,Rugose Spiralling Whitefly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Asia,India,,Unspecified,Country,One-time,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,9500,,,133.1845965,503.1011029,9500,133.1845965,503.1011029,INR,2020,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Health/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Benefit from biological control; benefits of crop protection cost,Achyut Kumar,
SC404,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Viruses,NA,NA,NA,Poxviridae,NA,Squirrelpox virus,,Squirrelpox virus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,9552,,,16591.30815,15289.14601,9552,16591.30815,15289.14601,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Squirrelpox virus surveillance.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC407,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Parque Nacional Maritimo-terrestre Das Illas Atlanticas De Galicia,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,10000,,,11527.96495,15067.53934,10000,11527.96495,15067.53934,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 20 % Autonomous region, 80% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC412,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,10000,,,17369.45996,16006.22488,10000,17369.45996,16006.22488,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Medical,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp168: annual cost of Weil's disease (virtually all cases are due to Norway rat),Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC413,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Eupatorium,Eupatorium serotinum,,late boneset,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,disturbed area,12a,N,Oceania,Australia,Queensland,Local/National Qld,Unit (<5 ha),18 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,1992,2009,One-time,10039,,,11429.29365,9212.362243,557.7222222,634.9607586,511.7979024,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Tomley & Panetta 2002",Jennifer Bufford,
SC414,,Vogele1991,Biological control of the fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams in Togo: A preliminary sociological and economic evaluation,"Vögele, J.M., Agounke, D., Moore, D.","The fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams, accidentally introduced into the West African region in the early 1980s, has been the subject of a successful biological control programme in Togo and elsewhere in West Africa. It is now kept at low population densities by the introduced specific parasitoid Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes. The sociological and economic impact of this successful biological control programme is evaluated. The economic assessment strongly suggests that the programme was very cost?effective. In addition, substantial non?quantifiable social and cultural benefits can be recorded.",1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Rastrococcus,Rastrococcus invadens,,Fruit tree mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Togo,,Togo,Country,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,10040,,,18835.38963,36785.26468,10040,18835.38963,36785.26468,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Mass rearing and release costs (Table 1),Ross Cuthbert,
SC415,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1991,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,One-time,10089.45,,,4474.559624,8013.950853,10089.45,4474.559624,8013.950853,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC416,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Bonova River/Guadalajara,Country,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,10207.12,,,14040.36617,15955.96876,10207.12,14040.36617,15955.96876,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink in River Bornova GUADALAJARA,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC417,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Parque Nacional Maritimo-terrestre Das Illas Atlanticas De Galicia,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,10481.63,,,11849.28741,16330.71844,10481.63,11849.28741,16330.71844,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 20 % Autonomous region, 80% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC419,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River Basin,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,"Zec Es1120003 Parga-landra-támoga, Zec Es1110003 Fragas Do Eume, Zec Es1110016 Río Tambre, Zec Es1140001 Sistema Fluvial Ulla-deza",Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,10630,,,12008.51091,16577.51509,10630,12008.51091,16577.51509,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC420,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,10703.36,,,4746.821928,8501.573525,10703.36,4746.821928,8501.573525,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC421,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River Basin,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,"Zec Es1120003 Parga-landra-támoga, Zec Es1110003 Fragas Do Eume, Zec Es1110016 Río Tambre, Zec Es1140001 Sistema Fluvial Ulla-deza",Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,10870,,,12530.8979,16378.41526,10870,12530.8979,16378.41526,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC422,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Cuenca Hidrografica Del Tajo,Unit (River Basin),2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,10958.75,,,12408.34334,16218.23125,10958.75,12408.34334,16218.23125,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation. This cost related to control the larvae of the invader.First kms of the location Trasvase between Rivers Tajo-Segura, in Guadalajara?",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
SC423,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Syzygium,Syzygium jambos,,Malabar plum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Floreana,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2007,2011,2007,2011,Potentially ongoing,11000,,,13004.16702,30312.49985,2200,2600.833404,6062.499969,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""Still in progress"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC424,,Brown2014,Cost-benefit analysis of managing the invasive African tulip tree (Spathodea campanulata) in the Pacific,"Brown, P, Daigneault, A","Invasive alien species such as Spathodea campanulata (African tulip tree) threaten biodiversity in the Pacific islands as well as the economic, social, and cultural wellbeing of Pacific peoples. Despite the potential magnitude of these threats, our scientific understanding of the ecology and management of the African tulip tree is nascent. In this paper, we use data from novel surveys of households and communities to document the direct and direct impacts of African tulip tree in Fiji, focusing on those impacts which may be monetised. We use the same data to describe current management approaches and then describe a stateof-the-science, ‘‘integrated’’ management approach that employs different strategies for trees of different ages and sizes. These two approaches are then compared in a comprehensive cost–benefit analysis. We find strong arguments for pursuing the integrated management approach, which derives monetised benefits of $3.7 for each $1 spent. However, the less costly current approach is also strictly preferred to the baseline, ‘‘do nothing’’ approach, with monetised benefits of $2.7 for each $1 spent. Results of this analysis clearly show that managing African tulip tree is cost effective, even without explicitly considering biodiversity, culture, and other non-monetised benefits of control.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Bignoniaceae,Spathodea,Spathodea campanulata,,African tulip tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,tropical wet forest,1,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Fiji,,Viti Levu,Unit (1 ha),2012,Period,2012,2062,2012,2062,Potentially ongoing,11201,,,11958.43728,20205.75637,219.627451,234.4791624,396.1913014,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Forestry ,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"costs of damage in lost productivity as a result of impacts on crops, livestock and forestry, assuming an estimate of 20% of cropland impacted currently.  Used costs under current management scenarios based on village surveys, scaled up over 50 years (into the future) - note that this is specified in the paper as the cost avoided if current management continues, but current management is estimated to reduce invasion by 50% so it should also be the cost of the invasion remaining following management?",Jennifer Bufford,
SC425,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1985,Year,1985,1985,1985,1985,One-time,11360.71,,,5038.349391,9023.700162,11360.71,5038.349391,9023.700162,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC426,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1982,Year,1982,1982,1982,1982,One-time,11650,,,5166.646311,9253.480362,11650,5166.646311,9253.480362,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC428,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1989,Year,1989,1989,1989,1989,One-time,11986.3,,,5315.791646,9520.600143,11986.3,5315.791646,9520.600143,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC429,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Lythraceae,Lythrum,Lythrum salicaria,,Purple loosestrife,Semi-Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,12000,,,12811.46749,12811.46749,12000,12811.46749,12811.46749,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC430,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Littorinomorpha,Calyptraeidae,Crepidula,Crepidula porcellana,,slipper limpet,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Wales,Unit (Menai Strait),Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,12000,,,20843.35195,19207.46986,12000,20843.35195,19207.46986,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"pp106: ""The four mussel companies fund a PhD project to examine the ecological requirements for slipper limpet establishment at an annual cost of £12,000""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC432,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,12519.58,,,5552.295435,9944.179199,12519.58,5552.295435,9944.179199,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC433,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,12519.58,,,5552.295435,9944.179199,12519.58,5552.295435,9944.179199,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC434,,FLDEP2006,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report Fiscal Year 2005-2006,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2006,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Arales,Araceae,Colocasia,Colocasia esculenta,,Wild taro,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,12617,,,15341.27791,15341.27791,12617,15341.27791,15341.27791,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC435,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Parque Nacional Maritimo-terrestre Das Illas Atlanticas De Galicia,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,12892.5,,,14597.88448,19080.05442,12892.5,14597.88448,19080.05442,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 20 % Autonomous region, 80% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC439,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,13806.71,,,6123.123372,10966.53389,13806.71,6123.123372,10966.53389,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC441,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Country,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,14000,,,19257.64823,21885.07265,14000,19257.64823,21885.07265,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink 2014,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC443,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Chikwenhere and Keswani, 1997",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Zimbabwe,,Zimbabwe,Unit (16 ha),1990,Period,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,14038,,,10729509.05,57229.841,14038,10729509.05,57229.841,ZWL,1990,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs of chemical management of Salvinia,Desika Moodley,
SC444,TC,SP_57,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST/Medidas para control de arrui en el parque regional de Sierra Espuña y en otros enclaves (2017-2018),Comunidad Autonoma de la region de Murcia. Direccion General del Medio Natural. Servicio de Biodiversidad Caza y Pesca Fluvial,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Ammotragus,Ammotragus lervia,,Arrui,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Sierra Espuña And Surroundings,Site,2017-2018,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,One-time,14103.38,,,16258.32703,21250.32329,14103.38,16258.32703,21250.32329,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration/Control,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Medidas para control de arrui en el parque regional de Sierra Espuña y en otros enclaves (2017-2018). The cost refers to a public tender,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC445,TC,SP_57,Respuesta a la solicitud de informacion de Elena Angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biologicas INVACOST,Comunidad Autonoma de la region de Murcia. Direccion General del Medio Natural. Servicio de Biodiversidad Caza y Pesca Fluvial,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Ammotragus,Ammotragus lervia,,Arrui,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Sierra Espuña And Surroundings,Site,2016-2017,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,One-time,14103.38,,,15932.32291,21994.26103,14103.38,15932.32291,21994.26103,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration/Control,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Medidas para control de arrui en el parque regional de Sierra Espuña y en otros enclaves (2017-2018). The cost refers to a public tender,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC446,TC,SP_57,Respuesta a la solicitud de informacion de Elena Angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biologicas INVACOST,Comunidad Autonoma de la region de Murcia. Direccion General del Medio Natural. Servicio de Biodiversidad Caza y Pesca Fluvial,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Ammotragus,Ammotragus lervia,,Arrui,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Sierra Espuña And Surroundings,Site,2018-2019,Year,2018,2019,2018,2019,One-time,14103.38,,,15968.93636,20872.0774,14103.38,15968.93636,20872.0774,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration/Control,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Medidas para control de arrui en el parque regional de Sierra Espuña y en otros enclaves (2017-2018). The cost refers to a public tender,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC447,TC,SP_57,Respuesta a la solicitud de informacion de Elena Angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biologicas INVACOST,Comunidad Autonoma de la region de Murcia. Direccion General del Medio Natural. Servicio de Biodiversidad Caza y Pesca Fluvial,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Bovidae,Ammotragus,Ammotragus lervia,,Arrui,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Murcia,Sierra Espuña And Surroundings,Site,2019-2020,Year,2019,2020,2019,2020,One-time,14103.38,,,15968.93636,20872.0774,14103.38,15968.93636,20872.0774,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration/Control,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Medidas para control de arrui en el parque regional de Sierra Espuña y en otros enclaves (2017-2018). The cost refers to a public tender,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC449,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus ulmifolius,,elmleaf blackberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,2002,2011,2002,2011,Potentially ongoing,14500,,,17141.85653,39957.38616,1450,1714.185653,3995.738616,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper the eradication attempt was considered ""unfinished and abandoned"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons, we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC450,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Nymphaeaceae,Nymphaea,Nymphaea mexicana,,Mexican nenuphar,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,14640.55,,,16577.16173,21667.05377,14640.55,16577.16173,21667.05377,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC451,,Oregon2000,"Economic Analysis of Containment Programs,
Damages, and Production Losses From Noxious Weeds in Oregon","Oregon Department of Agriculture, Plant Division, Noxious Weed Control Program",,2000,English,Official report,Oregon2014,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio jacobaea,,tansy ragwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Oregon,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,14668,,,20879.2918,20879.2918,14668,20879.2918,20879.2918,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Public and social welfare,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC453,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Arcotheca,Arctotheca calendula,,Cape weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,15000,,,23904.16241,23851.75538,1363.636364,2173.105674,2168.341399,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa,No
SC455,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Fucales,Sargassaceae,Sargassum,Sargassum muticum,,wireweed,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,beaches,5,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,15000,,,26054.18994,24009.33733,15000,26054.18994,24009.33733,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp108: ""Currently there is limited control of wireweed within Great Britain, with an estimated 15 beach clearance events taking place in England per annum at an estimated cost of £15,000 in total.""",Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC456,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,rhododendron,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,15000,,,26054.18994,24009.33733,15000,26054.18994,24009.33733,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Rhododendron ponticum.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC457,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Country,2016,Year,2016,2017,2016,2017,One-time,15068.808,,,17035.00666,23477.69007,15068.808,17035.00666,23477.69007,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC458,TC,EMTC_12,"Policies for the management of weeds in natural ecosystems: the case of scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius, L.) in an Australian national park",Odom et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,Satyal et al 2006 Economic and social impacts of restoration: a case study of the Great Basin Region,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Cytisus,Cytisus scoparius,,Scotch broom,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4a,N,Oceania,Australia,,Barrington Tops National Park,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,One-time,15453,,,11441.14364,15756.30191,15453,11441.14364,15756.30191,AUD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The reported cost is per year with an constrained model,Elena Manfrini,
SC459,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1987,Year,1987,1987,1987,1987,One-time,15625,,,6929.514902,12410.78375,15625,6929.514902,12410.78375,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC460,,Julien1980,Control of aquatic Alternanthera philoxeroides in Australia; another success for Agasicles hygrophila,"Julien, M.H.","Alternanthera philoxeroides (Martius) Grisebach, a native of South America, has become a weed in various countries including Australia where it has a very serious potential to spread widely throughout Australian waterways. Two natural enemies of A. philoxeroides, Agasicles hygrophila Selman and Vogt an Vogtia malloi Pastrana, were introduced into Australia in 1976 and release in 1977. The effects of V. malloi have been overshadowed by damage caused by A. hygrophila that has destroyed most of the floating A. philoxeroides. Where A. philoxeroides grows in swamps, pastures and drainage canals, the insects have not caused significant damage. A terrestrially orientated insect, Disonycha argentinensis Jacoby, was first released in Australia in Februry 1980.",1980,English,Peer-reviewed article,McConnachie2003,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Amaranthaceae,Alternanthera,Alternanthera philoxeroides,,Alligator-weed,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Aquatic species,11,N,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Site,1977-1979,Period,1977,1979,1977,1979,One-time,16000,,,54039.45344,49602.74034,5333.333333,18013.15115,16534.24678,USD,1979,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Avoided costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Biological control of aquatic weed reduced the original management costs. There is a reference to a paper from 1979 but I cannot find this one. Quote: ""Within the first two summers of release A. hygrophila effected substantial control of aquatic mats of A. philoxeroides. During this period a local government authority was able to cease their chemical control program, the costs of which was approximately $8000 annually (Julien et al 1979).",Laura Verbrugge,
SC461,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Littorinomorpha,Calyptraeidae,Crepidula,Crepidula porcellana,,slipper limpet,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Wales,Site,4 years,Period,2010,Unspecified,2010,2013,One-time,16000,,,27791.13594,25609.95982,4000,6947.783984,6402.489954,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.8 Countryside Council for Wales Funding: Slipper limpet,Nigel Taylor,No
SC464,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,16300,,,28312.21974,26090.14656,16300,28312.21974,26090.14656,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Mink PhD.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC465,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,1 year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,16368,,,28430.33206,26198.98889,16368,28430.33206,26198.98889,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Grey squirrel opinion poll.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC466,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Parque Nacional Maritimo-terrestre Das Illas Atlanticas De Galicia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,16500.41,,,18640.20258,25732.4361,16500.41,18640.20258,25732.4361,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 20 % Autonomous region, 80% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC467,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Fucales,Sargassaceae,Sargassum,Sargassum muticum,,wireweed,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,16598,,,28829.82964,26567.13206,16598,28829.82964,26567.13206,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Wireweed.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC468,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,17000,,,18149.57895,18149.57895,17000,18149.57895,18149.57895,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC470,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,17466.71,,,7746.292943,13873.63588,17466.71,7746.292943,13873.63588,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC471,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,ring-necked parakeet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Heathrow airport,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Heathrow Airport,Unit (airport),Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,17500,,,30396.55493,28010.89355,17500,30396.55493,28010.89355,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp134: cost of ring-necked parakeet strikes to aircraft at Heathrow Airport.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC472,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1986,Year,1986,1986,1986,1986,One-time,17811.7,,,7899.292197,14147.65804,17811.7,7899.292197,14147.65804,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC473,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,One-time,17956.91,,,7963.691228,14262.99691,17956.91,7963.691228,14262.99691,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC475,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,18163,,,20565.55174,26880.04874,18163,20565.55174,26880.04874,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES). It happened inland and in island. Founds: 25 % Autonomous region, 75% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC476,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,18312.5,,,20734.82719,27101.29894,18312.5,20734.82719,27101.29894,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Outreach,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES). It happened inland and in island. Founds: 25 % Autonomous region, 75% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC479,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,19000,,,32239.55293,32239.55293,19000,32239.55293,32239.55293,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Wildlife-recreation costs (i.e direct costs) from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC483,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,19281.3,,,21831.77739,28535.0594,19281.3,21831.77739,28535.0594,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,SC483(NE66),no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC484,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,19334.14,,,8574.47752,15356.91715,19334.14,8574.47752,15356.91715,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC485,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1996,Year,1996,1996,1996,1996,One-time,19564.7,,,8676.728333,15540.04869,19564.7,8676.728333,15540.04869,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC486,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,19987.92474,,,33468.56673,31350.36355,19987.92474,33468.56673,31350.36355,EUR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Survey of European mink. Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC487,TC,Tricarico2010,"The killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus (Sowinsky, 1894), is spreading
in Italy",Tricarico et al.,"In 2008, the killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus, native to the Ponto-Caspian region, was found for the first time in Central
Italy, in Bilancino, an artificial lake situated in the watershed of the River Arno (Tuscany). This new record shows that this
species’ range is expanding in Italy. It is thus imperative to identify the pathways and vectors of spread of this species in order to
halt this invasion process.",2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Amphipoda,Gammaridae,Dikerogammarus,Dikerogammarus villosus,,killer shrimp,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"Lake Bilancino is an artificial lake built in
1995 (but opened in 2002) to provide Florence
with water and energy; it is located in an
agricultural area, near a busy highway, and is an
oligotrophic lake (total nitrogen TN: 0.83 mg/l; nitric nitrogen NO3-: 0.5 mg/l; chlorophyll a: 2.3
mg/m3), with low dissolved oxygen saturation
during summer in the hypolimnion stratum
(<20%) and poor water transparency (on average
3.3 m) (data from the Regional Agency for the
protection on the environment, ARPAT 2009).
The lake has six influent rivers (Lora, Calecchia,
Tavaiano, Sieve, Sorcella, and Stura) and only
one effluent (Sieve).",11,N,Europe,Italy,Tuscany,Lake Bilancino,Unit (lake),since 2005,Year,2005,2010,2005,2010,Potentially ongoing,20000,,,29805.17501,29077.34381,20000,29805.17501,29077.34381,EUR,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Among the other alien species in the lake, D. polymorpha, recorded in Bilancino since 2005 (Lori and Cianfanelli 2006), is causing the strongest economic impact amounting to 20,000 Euro per year to clean pipes and tanks of the water treatment plant managed by the company Publiacqua (P. Grossi, pers. comm.).",Nigel Taylor,No
SC489,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Lythraceae,Lythrum,Lythrum salicaria,,Purple loosestrife,Semi-Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,20000,,,21352.44582,21352.44582,20000,21352.44582,21352.44582,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC490,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Lythraceae,Lythrum,Lythrum salicaria,,purple loosestrife,Semi-Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,10,N,North America,Canada,,Alberta,Site,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,20000,,,17355.72345,22170.10033,20000,17355.72345,22170.10033,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The data originate from a pers. Com whih cannot be checked.,Andrew Kramer,
SC493,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cylindropuntia,Cylindropuntia imbricata,,Tree cholla,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,20000,,,1388.617426,3473.244957,1000,69.43087128,173.6622478,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC495,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,20003.6474,,,27515.94322,31270.09118,20003.6474,27515.94322,31270.09118,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Fauna species conservation and IAS control. European mink survey and other sp in ARAGON 2010. Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC497,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,20364,,,35371.16826,32595.07636,20364,35371.16826,32595.07636,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: North American signal crayfish.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC498,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Procyonidae,Procyon,Procyon lotor,,Raccoon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Parque Natural De Baixa Limia-serra Do Xures E Zona De Influencia,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,20518.58,,,23179.45359,31998.78359,20518.58,23179.45359,31998.78359,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 25 % Autonomous region, 75% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC500,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2014,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,One-time,21565,,,29663.65601,33710.82797,21565,29663.65601,33710.82797,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC501,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,21586,,,9573.152555,17145.54739,21586,9573.152555,17145.54739,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC502,TC,Horvath2008,"Economically viable strategy for prevention of invasive species introduction: Case study of Otsego Lake, New York",Horvath,"The literature is full of examples detailing ecological impacts of invasive species and predictions of which and where species will
invade next. Many fewer examples of effective prevention strategies are known. Prevention of aquatic invasive species (AIS) to
inland lakes should be easily established because most AIS are initially introduced into watersheds by recreational boating activities,
especially in North America. The Watershed Management Plan for Otsego Lake, a central New York glacial lake, provides for
prevention of AIS via a stringent boat inspection and washing program (BIP). All boats entering Otsego Lake at the public launch
are visually inspected and those deemed likely to harbor AIS are required to power wash before launching. However, other sites are
available to launch boats. BIP expenses average $30,000 per year, much of which has been covered by collecting a launch fee. After
implementation of the BIP, only one boat was refused access, and less than 1% required washing before allowed access, however,
zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and water chestnut (Trapa natans) have since been found in the lake. The BIP continues to be
supported because other AIS may have been prevented or may be prevented in the future.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"The lake is of glacial origins… It is a dimictic lake that stratifies
from May to November. See Table 2 for detailed
limnological descriptions.
The shoreline is populated with private
residences, commercial establishments, and a
state park. On any given day, the lake is used by
recreational boaters, especially by anglers.
Annual boat counts reveal about 1300 resident
boats, and a conservative estimate of annual
public launches is 1300-1400. Its use is
moderate, relative to other highly populated
lakes in the area.",11,NA,North America,USA,New York,Otsego Lake,Unit (lake),2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,21706,,,24712.04782,24712.04782,21706,24712.04782,24712.04782,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Table 3: total expenses row,Nigel Taylor,
SC503,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,21763,,,37801.15571,34834.34722,21763,37801.15571,34834.34722,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Brown rats monitoring on Rum.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC504,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,21800,,,36990.64494,36990.64494,21800,36990.64494,36990.64494,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Soil and water conservation costs (i.e direct costs) from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC508,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,22461,,,9961.205389,17840.55128,22461,9961.205389,17840.55128,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC509,TC,Horvath2008,"Economically viable strategy for prevention of invasive species introduction: Case study of Otsego Lake, New York",Horvath,"The literature is full of examples detailing ecological impacts of invasive species and predictions of which and where species will
invade next. Many fewer examples of effective prevention strategies are known. Prevention of aquatic invasive species (AIS) to
inland lakes should be easily established because most AIS are initially introduced into watersheds by recreational boating activities,
especially in North America. The Watershed Management Plan for Otsego Lake, a central New York glacial lake, provides for
prevention of AIS via a stringent boat inspection and washing program (BIP). All boats entering Otsego Lake at the public launch
are visually inspected and those deemed likely to harbor AIS are required to power wash before launching. However, other sites are
available to launch boats. BIP expenses average $30,000 per year, much of which has been covered by collecting a launch fee. After
implementation of the BIP, only one boat was refused access, and less than 1% required washing before allowed access, however,
zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and water chestnut (Trapa natans) have since been found in the lake. The BIP continues to be
supported because other AIS may have been prevented or may be prevented in the future.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"The lake is of glacial origins… It is a dimictic lake that stratifies
from May to November. See Table 2 for detailed
limnological descriptions.
The shoreline is populated with private
residences, commercial establishments, and a
state park. On any given day, the lake is used by
recreational boaters, especially by anglers.
Annual boat counts reveal about 1300 resident
boats, and a conservative estimate of annual
public launches is 1300-1400. Its use is
moderate, relative to other highly populated
lakes in the area.",11,NA,North America,USA,New York,Otsego Lake,Unit (lake),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,22658,,,25795.88959,25795.88959,22658,25795.88959,25795.88959,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Table 3: total expenses row,Nigel Taylor,
SC510,TC,EMTC_12,"Policies for the management of weeds in natural ecosystems: the case of scotch broom (Cytisus scoparius, L.) in an Australian national park",Odom et al,,2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,Satyal et al 2006 Economic and social impacts of restoration: a case study of the Great Basin Region,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Cytisus,Cytisus scoparius,,Scotch broom,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4a,N,Oceania,Australia,,Barrington Tops National Park,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,One-time,22836,,,16907.39378,23284.21086,22836,16907.39378,23284.21086,AUD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The reported cost is per year with an unconstrained model,Elena Manfrini,
SC511,,Schaffelke2007,Impacts of introduced seaweeds,"Schaffelke, B., Hewitt, C.L.","We analyzed 69 publications on the impacts of introduced
seaweeds. The predominant impacts were
changed competitive relationships in the recipient habitat,
indicated by high abundances of invaders, resultant
space monopolization, and reduced abundances/biomass
of native macrophytes. Changes in biodiversity,
effects on fish and invertebrate fauna, toxic effects on
other biota, and habitat change were also identified. The
mechanisms underlying the manifestation of impacts are
uncertain and inferences about common patterns were
hampered because impact studies were available for only
a few introduced seaweeds, covered only a fraction of
their introduced distribution and generally were conducted
over short time scales. There was no information
about evolutionary effects or changes of ecosystem
processes. Knowledge of socio-economic impacts of
invasive seaweeds is poor. We collated costs associated
with control/eradication activities and for national spending
on marine biosecurity in Australia, New Zealand and
the United States. Prevention of impacts is the driving
force for costly surveillance, eradication and control programs.
Until we are able to understand, predict and
measure impacts of introduced seaweeds, the management
of species incursions needs to remain focused on
early detection, rapid response and control to reduce the
likelihood of negative impact effects.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Japanese kelp,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,marine,11,Y,Oceania,Australia,Tasmania,Tinderbox Marine Reserve,"Unit(""experimental scale"")",1997-1999,Period,1997,1999,1997,1999,Potentially ongoing,23000,,,27190.53104,19054.65196,7666.666667,9063.510347,6351.550655,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Table 2: ""manual removal at experimental scale' >US$23,000 over 3 years (5 person days/800 m2/month). See Hewitt 2005 ""Efficacy of physical removal of a marine pest: the introduced kelp Undaria pinnatifida in a Tasmanian Marine Reserve"" for further details e.g. dates of control 1997-1999, and fact that it's control rather than eradication (inferred from pp261).",Nigel Taylor,
SC514,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,23442.51,,,26501.32075,36524.18853,23442.51,26501.32075,36524.18853,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC515,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1995,Year,1995,1995,1995,1995,One-time,23779.54,,,10545.96331,18887.85463,23779.54,10545.96331,18887.85463,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC516,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,24199.87,,,27400.96232,35814.2204,24199.87,27400.96232,35814.2204,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,SC516(NE65),no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC517,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1991,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,One-time,24485.9,,,10859.22617,19448.90942,24485.9,10859.22617,19448.90942,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC520,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1998,Year,1998,1998,1998,1998,One-time,24632.63,,,10924.29931,19565.45562,24632.63,10924.29931,19565.45562,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC521,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Australian swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,24689,,,42883.4597,39517.76862,24689,42883.4597,39517.76862,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: New Zealand pigmyweed.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC522,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1996,Year,1996,1996,1996,1996,One-time,24779.19,,,10989.29705,19681.86679,24779.19,10989.29705,19681.86679,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC523,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Dam,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Extremadura,Reservoir Of Alcantara/caceres/cuenca Hidrografica Del Tajo,Unit (Dam),2017-2018,Period,2017,2018,2017,2018,One-time,24956.98,,,28770.31907,37604.02778,12478.49,14385.15954,18802.01389,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation. This cost related to buying platforms for cleaning boats.Project Life INVASEP",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC529,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,One-time,25827.47,,,11454.19765,20514.50527,25827.47,11454.19765,20514.50527,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC530,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1981,Year,1981,1981,1981,1981,One-time,26519,,,11760.88356,21063.78075,26519,11760.88356,21063.78075,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC531,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2015,Year,2015,2016,2015,2016,One-time,27500,,,31554.66393,42795.26325,27500,31554.66393,42795.26325,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC535,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,29000,,,30961.04644,30961.04644,29000,30961.04644,30961.04644,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC536,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aleyrodidae,Bemisia,Bemisia tabaci,,Tobacco whitefly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,12b,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,2005-2006,Period,2005,2006,2005,2006,One-time,29443,,,51140.90096,47127.12793,14721.5,25570.45048,23563.56396,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Bemisia tabaci on poinsettia cuttings. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC537,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon Autonomous Region,Country,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,29877.9776,,,40982.69642,45898.55606,29877.9776,40982.69642,45898.55606,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink in ARAGON 2012,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC539,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Ascidiacea,Aplousobranchia,Didemnidae,Didemnum,Didemnum vexillum,,compound sea squirt,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,1 year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,30000,,,52108.37988,48018.67465,30000,52108.37988,48018.67465,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Didemnum vexillum survey work. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC541,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Balsaminaceae,Impatiens,Impatiens glandulifera,,Himalayan balsam,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,3 years,Period,2010,Unspecified,2010,2012,One-time,30000,,,52108.37988,48018.67465,10000,17369.45996,16006.22488,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.5 Scottish Government Funding: Himalayan balsam biocontrol. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC542,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Wales,Site,2008-2010,Period,2008,2010,2008,2010,One-time,30000,,,52108.37988,48018.67465,10000,17369.45996,16006.22488,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.8 Countryside Council for Wales Funding: Neovison vison,Nigel Taylor,No
SC543,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,30019.05,,,41176.20106,46115.27152,30019.05,41176.20106,46115.27152,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink 2013,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC545,,Vogele1991,Biological control of the fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams in Togo: A preliminary sociological and economic evaluation,"Vögele, J.M., Agounke, D., Moore, D.","The fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams, accidentally introduced into the West African region in the early 1980s, has been the subject of a successful biological control programme in Togo and elsewhere in West Africa. It is now kept at low population densities by the introduced specific parasitoid Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes. The sociological and economic impact of this successful biological control programme is evaluated. The economic assessment strongly suggests that the programme was very cost?effective. In addition, substantial non?quantifiable social and cultural benefits can be recorded.",1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Rastrococcus,Rastrococcus invadens,,Fruit tree mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Togo,,Togo,Country,1989,Year,1989,1989,1989,1989,One-time,30150,,,59615.66634,,30150,59615.66634,,USD,1989,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Mass rearing and release costs (Table 1),Ross Cuthbert,
SC546,,Brown2014,Cost-benefit analysis of managing the invasive African tulip tree (Spathodea campanulata) in the Pacific,"Brown, P, Daigneault, A","Invasive alien species such as Spathodea campanulata (African tulip tree) threaten biodiversity in the Pacific islands as well as the economic, social, and cultural wellbeing of Pacific peoples. Despite the potential magnitude of these threats, our scientific understanding of the ecology and management of the African tulip tree is nascent. In this paper, we use data from novel surveys of households and communities to document the direct and direct impacts of African tulip tree in Fiji, focusing on those impacts which may be monetised. We use the same data to describe current management approaches and then describe a stateof-the-science, ‘‘integrated’’ management approach that employs different strategies for trees of different ages and sizes. These two approaches are then compared in a comprehensive cost–benefit analysis. We find strong arguments for pursuing the integrated management approach, which derives monetised benefits of $3.7 for each $1 spent. However, the less costly current approach is also strictly preferred to the baseline, ‘‘do nothing’’ approach, with monetised benefits of $2.7 for each $1 spent. Results of this analysis clearly show that managing African tulip tree is cost effective, even without explicitly considering biodiversity, culture, and other non-monetised benefits of control.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Bignoniaceae,Spathodea,Spathodea campanulata,,African tulip tree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,tropical wet forest,1,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,Fiji,,Viti Levu,Unit (1 ha),2012,Period,2012,2062,2012,2062,Potentially ongoing,30305,,,32354.29353,54667.92669,594.2156863,634.3979124,1071.920131,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Forestry ,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,"costs of management (mostly time/labor, some materials) for using current management practices (mostly manual removal, some herbicide) based on village surveys, scaled up over 50 years (into the future)",Jennifer Bufford,
SC547,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Cygnus,Cygnus olor,,mute swan,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,arable fields,12b,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,30647,,,53232.18394,49054.2774,30647,53232.18394,49054.2774,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp80: cost of controlling (harassing) mute swans in arable fields. Considered an alien species by Williams et al. Report also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC548,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,31000,,,33096.29102,33096.29102,31000,33096.29102,33096.29102,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC549,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Giant salvinia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,aquatic,11,N,Oceania,Australia,Northern Territory,Adelaide River,Unit (<10 ha),10 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2000,2009,One-time,31069,,,35371.72274,28510.69654,3106.9,3537.172274,2851.069654,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Miller & Pickering 1988, Miller pers comm",Jennifer Bufford,
SC550,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,New Year’s Dam,Site,1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,31134,,,13807.58508,24729.42984,31134,13807.58508,24729.42984,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC551,,Oregon2000,"Economic Analysis of Containment Programs,
Damages, and Production Losses From Noxious Weeds in Oregon","Oregon Department of Agriculture, Plant Division, Noxious Weed Control Program",,2000,English,Official report,Oregon2014,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Oregon,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,31372,,,44656.74546,44656.74546,31372,44656.74546,44656.74546,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Public and social welfare,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC554,TC,Horvath2008,"Economically viable strategy for prevention of invasive species introduction: Case study of Otsego Lake, New York",Horvath,"The literature is full of examples detailing ecological impacts of invasive species and predictions of which and where species will
invade next. Many fewer examples of effective prevention strategies are known. Prevention of aquatic invasive species (AIS) to
inland lakes should be easily established because most AIS are initially introduced into watersheds by recreational boating activities,
especially in North America. The Watershed Management Plan for Otsego Lake, a central New York glacial lake, provides for
prevention of AIS via a stringent boat inspection and washing program (BIP). All boats entering Otsego Lake at the public launch
are visually inspected and those deemed likely to harbor AIS are required to power wash before launching. However, other sites are
available to launch boats. BIP expenses average $30,000 per year, much of which has been covered by collecting a launch fee. After
implementation of the BIP, only one boat was refused access, and less than 1% required washing before allowed access, however,
zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and water chestnut (Trapa natans) have since been found in the lake. The BIP continues to be
supported because other AIS may have been prevented or may be prevented in the future.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"The lake is of glacial origins… It is a dimictic lake that stratifies
from May to November. See Table 2 for detailed
limnological descriptions.
The shoreline is populated with private
residences, commercial establishments, and a
state park. On any given day, the lake is used by
recreational boaters, especially by anglers.
Annual boat counts reveal about 1300 resident
boats, and a conservative estimate of annual
public launches is 1300-1400. Its use is
moderate, relative to other highly populated
lakes in the area.",11,NA,North America,USA,New York,Otsego Lake,Unit (lake),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,32053,,,36491.99617,36491.99617,32053,36491.99617,36491.99617,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Table 3: total expenses row,Nigel Taylor,
SC555,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea affinis,,Knapweeds -Spotted,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,33000,,,35231.53561,35231.53561,33000,35231.53561,35231.53561,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC558,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,33079,,,57785.79901,57785.79901,33079,57785.79901,57785.79901,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct economic impacts (reduced expenditures) from wildlife-associated recreation due to leafy spurge infestations on wildland. Were allocated to the Tourism and Recreation sector.,Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC559,,Riddin2016,The rise and fall of an invasive estuarine grass,"Riddin, T., van Wyk, E. and Adams, J.","Spartina alterniflora Loisel. is the only known halophyte that is invasive in intertidal salt marsh habitats in South Africa and it poses a considerable threat to the biodiversity of nearby estuaries. First detected in 2004, regular chemical treatment during the growing period from 2013 and adjustments to the recommended herbicide mix has almost completely removed the plant from the Great Brak Estuary. Part of the success of this treatment was due to the small area of infestation (~1 ha), which was not difficult to access. In 2009 there were 429 stems per m2 but following herbicide treatment between 2013 and 2015, by November 2015 there were only 149 stems in the entire estuary (mean = 8 stems per m2). Above-ground biomass had been reduced by 74% and below-ground biomass by 90%. Native salt marsh vegetation began to grow between the dead S. alterniflora shoots by October 2014 and increased to 95% cover by November 2015. Themaximumtotal invaded area of 10,221 m2 in 2011 was reduced to 10 m2 by November 2015. Average annual costs for the control of S. alterniflora were ~ZAR 34, 349), or $ 2414. This study is important as it is one of a few examples of a national prospect of eradication of an invasive alien plant. However continuous monitoring is necessary, as this plant has been shown in other countries to regrow after chemical treatment.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,Smooth cordgrass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Wyoming,Unit (10.221 m2),2013–2014,Year,2013,2014,2013,2014,Potentially ongoing,33502,,,2326.07305,5818.032627,33502,2326.07305,5818.032627,ZAR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost/year= Contractor cost+Researcher cost+Accommodation and travel+Herbicide,Desika Moodley,
SC562,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,South Dakota,Unit (River Basin),2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,34043.07,,,38546.19377,50381.51082,34043.07,38546.19377,50381.51082,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC564,,Riddin2016,The rise and fall of an invasive estuarine grass,"Riddin, T., van Wyk, E. and Adams, J.","Spartina alterniflora Loisel. is the only known halophyte that is invasive in intertidal salt marsh habitats in South Africa and it poses a considerable threat to the biodiversity of nearby estuaries. First detected in 2004, regular chemical treatment during the growing period from 2013 and adjustments to the recommended herbicide mix has almost completely removed the plant from the Great Brak Estuary. Part of the success of this treatment was due to the small area of infestation (~1 ha), which was not difficult to access. In 2009 there were 429 stems per m2 but following herbicide treatment between 2013 and 2015, by November 2015 there were only 149 stems in the entire estuary (mean = 8 stems per m2). Above-ground biomass had been reduced by 74% and below-ground biomass by 90%. Native salt marsh vegetation began to grow between the dead S. alterniflora shoots by October 2014 and increased to 95% cover by November 2015. Themaximumtotal invaded area of 10,221 m2 in 2011 was reduced to 10 m2 by November 2015. Average annual costs for the control of S. alterniflora were ~ZAR 34, 349), or $ 2414. This study is important as it is one of a few examples of a national prospect of eradication of an invasive alien plant. However continuous monitoring is necessary, as this plant has been shown in other countries to regrow after chemical treatment.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,Smooth cordgrass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Dakota,Unit (10.221 m2),2013–2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,Potentially ongoing,34592,,,2401.752699,6007.324477,34592,2401.752699,6007.324477,ZAR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost/year= Contractor cost+Researcher cost+Accommodation and travel+Herbicide,Desika Moodley,
SC566,,Riddin2016,The rise and fall of an invasive estuarine grass,"Riddin, T., van Wyk, E. and Adams, J.","Spartina alterniflora Loisel. is the only known halophyte that is invasive in intertidal salt marsh habitats in South Africa and it poses a considerable threat to the biodiversity of nearby estuaries. First detected in 2004, regular chemical treatment during the growing period from 2013 and adjustments to the recommended herbicide mix has almost completely removed the plant from the Great Brak Estuary. Part of the success of this treatment was due to the small area of infestation (~1 ha), which was not difficult to access. In 2009 there were 429 stems per m2 but following herbicide treatment between 2013 and 2015, by November 2015 there were only 149 stems in the entire estuary (mean = 8 stems per m2). Above-ground biomass had been reduced by 74% and below-ground biomass by 90%. Native salt marsh vegetation began to grow between the dead S. alterniflora shoots by October 2014 and increased to 95% cover by November 2015. Themaximumtotal invaded area of 10,221 m2 in 2011 was reduced to 10 m2 by November 2015. Average annual costs for the control of S. alterniflora were ~ZAR 34, 349), or $ 2414. This study is important as it is one of a few examples of a national prospect of eradication of an invasive alien plant. However continuous monitoring is necessary, as this plant has been shown in other countries to regrow after chemical treatment.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus alterniflorus,,Smooth cordgrass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Great Brak Estuary,Unit (10.221 m2),2014–2015,Year,2014,2015,2014,2015,Potentially ongoing,34953,,,2426.817244,6070.016549,34953,2426.817244,6070.016549,ZAR,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost/year= Contractor cost+Researcher cost+Accommodation and travel+Herbicide,Desika Moodley,
SC568,WoS,Witt2020,"A preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the biological control agent Dactylopius opuntiae on Opuntia stricta in Laikipia County, Kenya Arne",Witt et al.,"Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw (Cactaceae) is invasive in Laikipia County, Kenya, impacting negatively on biodiversity and livelihoods. To control this invasive plant the biocontrol agent Dactylopius opuntiae (Cockerell) (Hemiptera; Dactylopiidae) ‘stricta’ biotype was released in 2014. A preliminary once-off survey to determine the impact of the cochineal revealed that it had contributed to a significant reduction in the number of cladodes, flowers and fruit of plants with cochineal. Fruits that were produced on plants with the cochineal were also smaller and had fewer seeds. Although still preliminary, an analysis of the costs of implementing this biocontrol programme indicates that it is the most cost-effective management intervention compared to physical and/or chemical control. Although the impact of the cochineal is still fairly localized we are confident that it will establish in much of the invaded range and reduce the impacts of the invasive cactus, consequently improving rangeland condition and livelihoods.",2020,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"A mix of grasslands, savannah woodland, and forest lying between the Aberdare Mountains to the south and southwest, Mount Kenya to the east and southeast, Eastern (Gregory) Rift Valley to the west, Karisia Hills to the north-west, Mathews Range to the north, and Samburu National Reserve to the northeast",1\2\4,N,Africa,Kenya,,Laikipia,Site,During 3 years,Period,2014,Unspecified,2014,2016,One-time,35000,,,36239.43708,78965.00658,11666.66667,12079.81236,26321.66886,USD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost for biological control programme. Cost is underestimated as the article indicated that many activites are being undertaken at no or reduced costs, and some of the costs are unknown.",Justice Tambo,
SC572,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1994,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,One-time,35414.82,,,15706.08147,28129.64304,35414.82,15706.08147,28129.64304,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC573,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Alopochen,Alopochen aegyptiaca,,Egyptian goose,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,agriculture,12b,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,35924,,,62398.04796,57500.76228,35924,62398.04796,57500.76228,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp79: cost of agricultural damage caused by Egyptian geese. Cost given for England only, but all resident barancle geese in GB are in England, so this estimate also reflects cost for whole GB (England/Scotland/Wales).",Nigel Taylor,No
SC574,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea diffusa,,Knapweeds - Diffuse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,36000,,,38434.40248,38434.40248,36000,38434.40248,38434.40248,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC576,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"Nseleni System, Kwazulu-natal",Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,36002.65,,,15966.77758,28596.55062,36002.65,15966.77758,28596.55062,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC579,,Vogele1991,Biological control of the fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams in Togo: A preliminary sociological and economic evaluation,"Vögele, J.M., Agounke, D., Moore, D.","The fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams, accidentally introduced into the West African region in the early 1980s, has been the subject of a successful biological control programme in Togo and elsewhere in West Africa. It is now kept at low population densities by the introduced specific parasitoid Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes. The sociological and economic impact of this successful biological control programme is evaluated. The economic assessment strongly suggests that the programme was very cost?effective. In addition, substantial non?quantifiable social and cultural benefits can be recorded.",1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Rastrococcus,Rastrococcus invadens,,Fruit tree mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Togo,,Togo,Country,1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,37450,,,77624.36809,,37450,77624.36809,,USD,1988,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Mass rearing and release costs (Table 1),Ross Cuthbert,
SC580,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,One-time,37572,,,16662.76697,29843.06989,37572,16662.76697,29843.06989,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC581,,Brown2015,Managing the Invasive Small Indian Mongoose in Fiji,"Brown, P., & Daigneault, A.","Hence, the NPV of using kill traps for the typical village is FJ$37,581.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes javanicus,,Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Man-made,12,N,Asia,Fiji,,,Unit (1.47 ha),2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,37581,,,22416.02858,37875.58539,37581,22416.02858,37875.58539,FJD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,They provided the benefit values in a Table but not decribed the benift in Results section.,Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
SC582,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,37943.15,,,66282.99645,66282.99645,37943.15,66282.99645,66282.99645,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Reductions in soil and water conservation benefits from leafy spurge-infested wildland. Direct economic impacts from soil and water conservation represent changes in expenditures to prevent or counteract damage from pollutants. Direct economic impacts from reduced soil and water conservation benefits were allocated to the Government, Agriculture-Crops, and Electricity Generation sectors.",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC584,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Littorinomorpha,Calyptraeidae,Crepidula,Crepidula porcellana,,slipper limpet,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Wales,Unit (Menai Strait),Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,38000,,,66003.94785,60823.65456,38000,66003.94785,60823.65456,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Administration/Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp105-106: ""The development of a Standard Operating Procedure for checking that shipments of mussel seeds are free of slipper limpet for the Menai Strait cost ca. £5,000 and each inspection costs approximately £2,000 (Andy Woolmer, pers. comm.). In 2009, the number of formal inspections was 4 (James Wilson, pers. comm.). The total cost of implementing a code of good conduct in the Menai Strait was estimated at £20,000 (Gabrielle Wyn, pers. comm.).... authorisation to export mussels to the Netherlands costs approximately £5,000 per year (James Wilson, pers. comm.).""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC585,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Myiopsitta,Myiopsitta monachus,,monk parakeet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,38000,,,66003.94785,60823.65456,38000,66003.94785,60823.65456,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Monk parakeets control feasibility study. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC586,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1991,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,One-time,38226,,,16952.80874,30362.53565,38226,16952.80874,30362.53565,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC587,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,"Concellos De Vedra, Boqueixón, Aranga, Oleiros, Santiago De Compostela, Trazo, Frades, Toques, Santiso E Cambre",Site,2017-2018,Year,2017,2018,2017,2018,One-time,38571.02,,,44464.53667,58117.0361,38571.02,44464.53667,58117.0361,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 25 % Autonomous region, 75% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC590,TC,Flacio2015,Strategies of a thirteen year surveillance programme on Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) in southern Switzerland,Flacio et al.,"Background
In Ticino, a canton located south of the Alps in Switzerland, a surveillance programme on Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) started in 2000 seeing that the region was considered at high risk of introduction based on the rapid spread of this mosquito in neighbouring Italy.

Methods
The surveillance programme, which is still ongoing, was adapted continuously to handle preventive measures of arrival, dispersal and establishment of this invasive species. The monitoring was based on ovitraps supported by reports from the population. The integrated control measures included removal of breeding sites, larvicide applications with Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis or diflubenzuron and, in some circumstances, adulticide applications with permethrin. These measures involved citizens, municipalities and Civil Protection Units.

Results
Ae. albopictus was first observed in 2003 in Ticino. We describe the strategies adopted and their adaptations to the evolving problem since year 2000. The approach used allowed keeping the mosquito densities at tolerable levels and below the threshold of autochthonous Ae. albopictus borne disease transmission. During the surveillance period, new typologies of breeding sites for Ae. albopictus have been discovered.

Conclusions
It was worth tackling the arrival of Ae. albopictus and adopting immediate control measures, followed by regular control measures after its establishment. Early intervention and prevention of the possible spread of the tiger mosquito over the territory avoided facing a crisis situation. This also reduced the difficulty of managing the situation and probably also reduced the overall cost if this had not been put in place.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11\12,NA,Europe,Switzerland,Ticino,Ticino,Unit (canton),1st period (2000-2004),Period,2000,2004,2000,2004,One-time,40000,,,42984.44424,33483.52878,8000,8596.888847,6696.705755,CHF,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cost for first period. ""Cost factors may affect strategies applied for the surveillance and the control of the tiger mosquito [35,36]. In our case, the limited budget resources for salaries and materials, which reached at the beginning around 10,000 CHF/year and rose up to 8 folds in the 2nd period to 20 folds in the 3rd one, as well as the increasing amount of work, due to the spread of the tiger mosquito, prompted us to constantly rationalize the system and to outsource part of the work to the concerned municipalities during the 3rd period."" Additional info on Type_of_cost throughout paper.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC591,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Furcraea,Furcraea hexapetala,,Cuban hemp,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Floreana,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2007,2010,2007,2010,Potentially ongoing,40000,,,47287.88007,110227.2722,10000,11821.97002,27556.81804,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""Feasibility not fully determined; not
selected as eradication target.
Control still in
progress"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC592,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja Autonomous Region,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,40000,,,45219.25467,62321.29329,40000,45219.25467,62321.29329,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink in LA RIOJA,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC596,Go,,"Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of Risk Assessments: Final Report (year 2). Risk assessment template developed under the ""Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of risk assessments to tackle priority species and enhance prevention"" Contract No 07.0202/2017/763379/ETU/ENV.D.2","Marika Galanidi, Argyro Zenetos, Daniel S. Chapman",-,2018,English,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Tetraodontiformes,Tetraodontidae,Lagocephalus,Lagocephalus sceleratus,,silver-cheeked toadfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,Cyprus,,Mediterranean,Country,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,41235,,,46615.39916,65327.59551,41235,46615.39916,65327.59551,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"population control campaigns with intensive targeted fishery of the breeding population of the species in the summer months have taken place in Cyprus in 2012-2016. 
The amount paid to beneficiaries was €3/kg and it amounted to €600K in 5 years through a management plan partly covered by European fisheries funds [€102480 (34160 kg) in 2012, €43.800 in 2013, €164.940 (54.980 kg) in 2014, €249.465 (83.155 kg) in 2015, €41.235 (13.745 kg) in 2016] (DFMR Cyprus 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016).",Melina Kouranditou,No
SC597,TC,SP_63,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fagales,Fagaceae,Quercus,Quercus rubra,,Roble americano,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Quercus forests currentrly invaded by Quercus rubra,1,Y,Europe,Spain,Navarra,Zec Sierra De Aralar/natural Reserve Of Putxerri,Site,12 years,Period,2008,2020,2008,2020,One-time,41340.64,,,46809.06628,61181.43579,3180.049231,3600.697407,4706.264292,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC598,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,41552.7,,,56996.55151,63833.2673,41552.7,56996.55151,63833.2673,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control american mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC600,,Oregon2000,"Economic Analysis of Containment Programs,
Damages, and Production Losses From Noxious Weeds in Oregon","Oregon Department of Agriculture, Plant Division, Noxious Weed Control Program",,2000,English,Official report,Oregon2014,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Carthamus,Carthamus lanatus,,distaff thistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Oregon,Site,2000,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,41584,,,59193.10542,59193.10542,41584,59193.10542,59193.10542,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Public and social welfare,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC603,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrografica Del Tajo,Unit (River Basin),2017-2018,Period,2017,2018,2017,2018,One-time,41868.14,,,48265.44505,63084.98463,20934.07,24132.72253,31542.49232,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation. This cost related to buying platforms for cleaning boats. It refers to the reservoirs of San Juan (San Martín de Valdeiglesias, Madrid ) and Entrepeñas (Sacedón, Guadalajara). Project Life INVASEP",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC605,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,42000,,,44840.13623,44840.13623,42000,44840.13623,44840.13623,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC606,TC,Horvath2008,"Economically viable strategy for prevention of invasive species introduction: Case study of Otsego Lake, New York",Horvath,"The literature is full of examples detailing ecological impacts of invasive species and predictions of which and where species will
invade next. Many fewer examples of effective prevention strategies are known. Prevention of aquatic invasive species (AIS) to
inland lakes should be easily established because most AIS are initially introduced into watersheds by recreational boating activities,
especially in North America. The Watershed Management Plan for Otsego Lake, a central New York glacial lake, provides for
prevention of AIS via a stringent boat inspection and washing program (BIP). All boats entering Otsego Lake at the public launch
are visually inspected and those deemed likely to harbor AIS are required to power wash before launching. However, other sites are
available to launch boats. BIP expenses average $30,000 per year, much of which has been covered by collecting a launch fee. After
implementation of the BIP, only one boat was refused access, and less than 1% required washing before allowed access, however,
zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) and water chestnut (Trapa natans) have since been found in the lake. The BIP continues to be
supported because other AIS may have been prevented or may be prevented in the future.",2008,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"The lake is of glacial origins… It is a dimictic lake that stratifies
from May to November. See Table 2 for detailed
limnological descriptions.
The shoreline is populated with private
residences, commercial establishments, and a
state park. On any given day, the lake is used by
recreational boaters, especially by anglers.
Annual boat counts reveal about 1300 resident
boats, and a conservative estimate of annual
public launches is 1300-1400. Its use is
moderate, relative to other highly populated
lakes in the area.",11,NA,North America,USA,New York,Otsego Lake,Unit (lake),2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,42613,,,48514.44272,48514.44272,42613,48514.44272,48514.44272,USD,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Table 3: total expenses row,Nigel Taylor,
SC607,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Nerium,Nerium oleander,,Oleander,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,43000,,,2985.527465,7467.476657,2150,149.2763733,373.3738329,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC608,,FLDEP2006,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report Fiscal Year 2005-2006,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2006,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Hymenachne,Hymenachne amplexicaulis,,West Indian marsh grass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,43259,,,52599.53564,52599.53564,43259,52599.53564,52599.53564,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC610,Go,,"Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of Risk Assessments: Final Report (year 2). Risk assessment template developed under the ""Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of risk assessments to tackle priority species and enhance prevention"" Contract No 07.0202/2017/763379/ETU/ENV.D.2","Marika Galanidi, Argyro Zenetos, Daniel S. Chapman",-,2018,English,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Tetraodontiformes,Tetraodontidae,Lagocephalus,Lagocephalus sceleratus,,silver-cheeked toadfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,Cyprus,,Mediterranean,Country,2013,Year,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,43800,,,61208.66052,67053.44089,43800,61208.66052,67053.44089,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"population control campaigns with intensive targeted fishery of the breeding population of the species in the summer months have taken place in Cyprus in 2012-2016. 
The amount paid to beneficiaries was €3/kg and it amounted to €600K in 5 years through a management plan partly covered by European fisheries funds [€102480 (34160 kg) in 2012, €43.800 in 2013, €164.940 (54.980 kg) in 2014, €249.465 (83.155 kg) in 2015, €41.235 (13.745 kg) in 2016] (DFMR Cyprus 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016).",Melina Kouranditou,No
SC612,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Hyacinthoides,Hyacinthoides hispanica,,Spanish bluebell,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,2006-2007,Period,2006,2007,2006,2007,One-time,44000,,,76425.62383,70427.38949,22000,38212.81191,35213.69475,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.5 Scottish Government Funding: Variation within bluebell and hybrid population. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC614,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon Autonomous Region,Country,2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,44052.23299,,,70202.11547,70048.2057,44052.23299,70202.11547,70048.2057,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,European mink survey and other sp in ARAGON 2009. Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC618,,Vogele1991,Biological control of the fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams in Togo: A preliminary sociological and economic evaluation,"Vögele, J.M., Agounke, D., Moore, D.","The fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams, accidentally introduced into the West African region in the early 1980s, has been the subject of a successful biological control programme in Togo and elsewhere in West Africa. It is now kept at low population densities by the introduced specific parasitoid Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes. The sociological and economic impact of this successful biological control programme is evaluated. The economic assessment strongly suggests that the programme was very cost?effective. In addition, substantial non?quantifiable social and cultural benefits can be recorded.",1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Rastrococcus,Rastrococcus invadens,,Fruit tree mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Togo,,Togo,Country,1987,Year,1987,1987,1987,1987,One-time,45000,,,97077.06271,,45000,97077.06271,,USD,1987,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Development costs (Table 1).,Ross Cuthbert,
SC619,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum quitoense,,naranjilla,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santiago,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2006,2010,2006,2010,Potentially ongoing,45960,,,54333.7742,126651.1357,9192,10866.75484,25330.22714,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""Distribution not fully determined and cost high, so not selected as eradication target"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC624,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,48132.91,,,54499.7991,71233.54991,48132.91,54499.7991,71233.54991,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC625,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,48294.97,,,54683.29595,71473.38808,48294.97,54683.29595,71473.38808,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC627,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea affinis,,Knapweeds -Spotted,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,49000,,,52313.49226,52313.49226,49000,52313.49226,52313.49226,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC630,TC,Galil2007,Seeing Red: Alien species along the Mediterranean coast of Israel,"Galil, B.S.","An overview is presented of the metazoan alien biota recorded from the Mediterranean coast of Israel. Of the 296 alien species,
284 have been introduced from the Red Sea/Indo West-Pacific through the Suez Canal. A brief history of the research on
introduced species along the Israeli coast is presented along with the list of species, and their ecological and economic impacts
are discussed.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Cnidaria,Scyphozoa,Rhizostomeae,Rhizostomatidae,Rhopilema,Rhopilema nomadica,,nomad jellyfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,seawater intake pipes,11,NA,Asia,Israel,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Unit (two power plants),2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,50000,,,59109.85009,65189.13725,50000,59109.85009,65189.13725,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Jellyfish-blocked water intake pipes pose a threat to cooling systems of port-bound vessels and coastal power plants: in the summer of 2001 Israel Electric removed tons of jellyfish from its seawater intake pipes at its two largest power plants, at estimated costs of 50,000 US$ (M. Cohen, pers. comm.).""",Nigel Taylor,
SC632,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Galicia Autonomous Region,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,50000,,,56484.05882,77975.14152,50000,56484.05882,77975.14152,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax.(SUBSPECIES) It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC633,,Vogele1991,Biological control of the fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams in Togo: A preliminary sociological and economic evaluation,"Vögele, J.M., Agounke, D., Moore, D.","The fruit tree mealybug Rastrococcus invadens Williams, accidentally introduced into the West African region in the early 1980s, has been the subject of a successful biological control programme in Togo and elsewhere in West Africa. It is now kept at low population densities by the introduced specific parasitoid Gyranusoidea tebygi Noyes. The sociological and economic impact of this successful biological control programme is evaluated. The economic assessment strongly suggests that the programme was very cost?effective. In addition, substantial non?quantifiable social and cultural benefits can be recorded.",1991,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Rastrococcus,Rastrococcus invadens,,Fruit tree mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Togo,,Togo,Country,1986,Year,1986,1986,1986,1986,One-time,50000,,,111816.1256,,50000,111816.1256,,USD,1986,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Development costs (Table 1).,Ross Cuthbert,
SC635,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Pseudorasbora,Pseudorasbora parva,,topmouth gudgeon,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,50000,,,86847.2998,80031.12442,50000,86847.2998,80031.12442,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment/Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp106: cost based on Britton et al. (2010).,Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC640,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Castilla-La Mancha,Las Herencias/Toledo/Rio Tajo,Unit (River),1/8/2019-31/5/2020,Year,2019,2020,2019,2020,One-time,50744.18,,,57456.48072,75098.05824,50744.18,57456.48072,75098.05824,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation.",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
SC644,,Hester2010,Applying a simulation model to the management of an infestation of Miconia calvescens in the wet tropics of Australia,"Hester SM, Brooks SJ, Cacho OJ, Panetta FD","A simulation model that combines biological, search and economic components is applied to the eradication of a Miconia calvescens infestation at El Arish in tropical Queensland, Australia. Information on the year M.?calvescens was introduced to the site, the number of plants controlled and the timing of control, is used to show that currently there could be M.?calvescens plants remaining undetected at the site, including some mature plants. Modelling results indicate that the eradication programme has had a significant impact on the population of M.?calvescens, as shown by simulated results for uncontrolled and controlled populations. The model was also used to investigate the effect of changing search effort on the cost of and time to eradication. Control costs were found to be negligible over all levels of search effort tested. Importantly, results suggest eradication may be achieved within several decades, if resources are increased slightly from their current levels and if there is a long?term commitment to funding the eradication programme.",2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,"miconia, velvet tree, bush currant",Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,tropical rainforest (coastal wet tropical lowlands of north Queensland (NE Australia) extending into rainforest and the Japoon National Park),1,Y,Oceania,Australia,Queensland,"El Arish (17'48""s, 145'59""e) And Japoon National Park, North Queensland",Site,2006-2007,Year,2006,2007,2006,2007,Potentially ongoing,52479,,,48050.90769,45472.49837,52479,48050.90769,45472.49837,AUD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"in-kind costs were also noted but no monetary value was given to these, so they are excluded from cost estimate. ""Staff representing Queensland Parks and Wildlife and Cassowary Coast regional council provided additional in-kind assistance with search and control activities at El Arish, between 2004 and 2008."" (p. 271).",Jane Catford,
SC645,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Thevetia,Thevetia peruviana,,Yellow oleander,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,53000,,,3679.836178,9204.099136,2650,183.9918089,460.2049568,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC646,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,La Rioja,La Rioja Autonomous Region,Country,2001-2002,Period,2001,2002,2001,2002,One-time,53700.82099,,,69196.40377,98582.913,26850.4105,34598.20188,49291.4565,EUR,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink in LA RIOJA LIFE,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC648,,McConnachie2003,Economic evaluation of the successful biological control of Azolla filiculoides in South Africa,"McConnachie, A.J., de Wit, M.T., Hill, M.P., Byrne, M.J.","Azolla filiculoides (red waterfern) is a floating fern native to South America which has invaded aquatic ecosystems in South
Africa. Thick mats of A. filiculoides on dams and slow-moving water bodies cause economic losses to water-users. Affected waterusers
were surveyed using a questionnaire to assess the importance of the weed. Among those most seriously affected were farming
(71%), recreational (24%), and municipal (5%) users. The average water area covered by A. filiculoides (per water-user) was 2.17 ha,
with an expansion rate of 1.33 ha per year. The frond-feeding weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was released as a biological control agent
at the end of 1997. Within 3 years, the weevil had reduced the weed population to the point that it was no longer considered a
problem in South Africa. Based on year 2000 data, the cost savings (per user per hectare) resulting from the biological control
program included a reduction of on-site damages caused bythe weed to the value of US$589 per hectare per year. The average cost
per hectare per year for the biological control program for the period 1995–2000 amounted to US$278, excluding investment costs of
USD$7700 in 1995. These historic costs and benefits were adjusted to constant year 2000 values. The predicted spread of the weed
was calculated on the basis of a sigmoid-curve rate of spread model. The net present value (NPV) of the program was calculated
from 1995 onwards and discounted at 8%. This resulted in a NPV of US$1093 per hectare and US$206 million for South Africa as a
whole. For the year 2000, the benefit–cost ratio was calculated at 2.5:1, increasing rapidly to 13:1 in 2005, and 15:1 in 2010 as the
costs of the biological control program are expected to decrease. These indicators reinforce the overall economic viabilityof biological
control, but do not necessarilyconfirm the viabilityof biological control on each management unit itself. The results reflect
the dynamics of biological control on site-specific survey information, and place higher benefit–cost ratios achieved in other national
level studies in a better context. It also raises the important policyquestion of who is responsible to finance such control programs in
future, because on-site benefits of control are enough to justifythe program in its own right. The paper concludes with recommendations
on a financial mechanism to address biological control of invasive species in a sustainable manner.",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Red water fern,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,1995-2000,Period,1995,2000,1995,2000,One-time,54662,,,77809.09793,198068.5159,9110.333333,12968.18299,33011.41931,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"The total cost of developing and releasing Stenopelmus rufinasus, plus start-up costs.
against Azolla filiculoides in constant 2000 prices (1995–2000)",Ross Cuthbert,
SC649,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2020,Year,2020,2020,2020,2020,One-time,54937.5,,,62204.48157,81303.89681,54937.5,62204.48157,81303.89681,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES). It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC650,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,54995,,,95523.34505,88026.23375,54995,95523.34505,88026.23375,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Mink.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC651,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea diffusa,,Knapweeds - Diffuse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,55000,,,58719.22601,58719.22601,55000,58719.22601,58719.22601,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC652,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1996,Year,1996,1996,1996,1996,One-time,55777,,,24736.48337,44303.12224,55777,24736.48337,44303.12224,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC653,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,56806,,,25192.8335,45120.44682,56806,25192.8335,45120.44682,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC654,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,One-time,56839,,,25207.46864,45146.65839,56839,25207.46864,45146.65839,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC657,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River Basin,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Zec Es1140011 Gandaras De Budiño,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,58180.8,,,65876.79638,86103.76809,58180.8,65876.79638,86103.76809,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 20 % Autonomous region, 80% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC662,,Dahlsten2000,Biological control of the blue gum psyllid proves economically beneficial,"Dahlsten, D.L., Hansen, E.P., Zuparko, R.L., Norgaard, R.B.","In 1992 a parasitoid native to Australia was introduced into California in a biological control program
directed against the blue gum
psyllid from Australia. Interviews
with baby blue gum eucalyptus
growers indicate that this program has had a benefit-cost ratio
ranging from at least 9: 1 to 24: 1,
based solely on the reduction of
insecticide treatments. Additional
economic benefits, including
greater foliage yield, possible reduced environmental and health
effects, and avoided pesticide resistance, were not calculated, but
would further increase this ratio. ",2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Eucalyptus,Eucalyptus pulverulenta,,blue gum,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,California,,Site,60 days,Period,1992,1992,1992,1992,One-time,62000,,,108307.976,108307.976,62000,108307.976,108307.976,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,cost of a 60 biocontrol programme,,
SC663,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,white leadtree,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Floreana,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2007,2011,2007,2011,Potentially ongoing,62000,,,73296.21411,170852.2719,12400,14659.24282,34170.45437,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""Evaluated as further survey needed
before selection as eradication
target, but started and continuing"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC664,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrografica Del Tajo,Unit (River Basin),2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,62189.16,,,71691.44569,93703.76145,62189.16,71691.44569,93703.76145,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation. This cost related to buying mobile instalations for cleaning boats. Project Life INVASEP",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC666,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,63000,,,106899.5702,106899.5702,63000,106899.5702,106899.5702,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Secondary costs from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC668,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1980,Year,1980,1980,1980,1980,One-time,64103,,,28428.9724,50916.38212,64103,28428.9724,50916.38212,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC672,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,65034.71,,,73637.32277,96247.10537,65034.71,73637.32277,96247.10537,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC673,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrografica Del Tajo,Unit (River Basin),2006-2020,Period,2006,2020,2006,2020,Potentially ongoing,66288.16,,,75056.57569,98102.12916,4419.210667,5003.771713,6540.141944,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Early detection,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation. The costs relate to the control of larvae of the invader. It refers to the reservoirs within the location, where detection is carried out each year together with other task related to the ecological potential of the water bodies.",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC674,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Aragon,Aragon Autonomous Region,Country,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,66359.611,,,98892.99096,102610.3427,66359.611,98892.99096,102610.3427,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,European mink survey and other sp in ARAGON 2010. Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC679,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1994,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,One-time,70071,,,31075.71448,55656.70579,70071,31075.71448,55656.70579,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC680,GS,,"Economic appraisal of the public control and prevention strategy against the 2010 West Nile Virus outbreak in Central Macedonia, Greece","A. Kolimenakis, K. Bithas, C. Richardson, D. Latinopoulos, A. Baka, A. Vakali, C. Hadjichristodoulou, S. Mourelatos, S. Kalaitzopoulou, S. Gewehr, A. Michaelakis, G. Koliopoulous","Objectives
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of the public control and prevention strategies to tackle the 2010 West Nile Virus (WNV) outbreak in the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Efficiency is examined on the basis of the public prevention costs incurred and their potential in justifying the costs arising from health and nuisance impacts in the succeeding years.

Study design
Economic appraisal of public health management interventions.

Methods
Prevention and control cost categories including control programmes, contingency planning and blood safety testing, are analyzed based on market prices. A separate cost of illness approach is conducted for the estimation of medical costs and productivity losses from 2010 to 2013 and for the calculation of averted health impacts. The averted mosquito nuisance costs to households are estimated on the basis of a contingent valuation study. Based on these findings, a limited cost-benefit analysis is employed in order to evaluate the economic efficiency of these strategies in 2010–2013.

Results
Results indicate that cost of illness and prevention costs fell significantly in the years following the 2010 outbreak, also as a result of the epidemic coming under control. According to the contingent valuation survey, the annual average willingness to pay to eliminate the mosquito problem in the study area ranged between 22 and 27 € per household. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that the aggregate benefit of implementing the previous 3-year strategy creates a net socio-economic benefit in 2013. However the spread of the WNV epidemic and the overall socio-economic consequences, had the various costs not been employed, remain unpredictable and extremely difficult to calculate.

Conclusions
The application of a post epidemic strategy appears to be of utmost importance for public health safety. An updated well designed survey is needed for a more precise definition of the optimum prevention policies and levels and for the establishment of the various cost/benefit parameters.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Greece,Macedonia,Region Of Central Macedonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,One-time,71025,,,97422.79253,110752.112,71025,97422.79253,110752.112,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC684,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1995,Year,1995,1995,1995,1995,One-time,72967,,,32360.05849,57956.97009,72967,32360.05849,57956.97009,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC686,,Leavold2007,Development of case studies on the economic impacts of invasive species in Africa: Salvinia molesta,"Leavold, V. Lloyd, L. and Lepetit, J.","This report details the results of an extensive desktop study to quantify the economic impacts of an invasive weed species in Africa. Salvinia molesta (Salvinia) is a floating water weed found in the lower Senegal River delta in Senegal. Salvinia reproduces vegetatively, is easily spread by flowing water as well as by stock, vehicles and water craft. The plant forms a thick mat on the water’s surface, making transport by water difficult, interfering with fishing activities as well as limiting biodiversity by blocking sunlight and impeding oxygen exchange. Salvinia infestation of the Djoudj National Park and other areas may lead to a reduction in tourist numbers. This report examines the economic impact of this invasive weed species, including impacts on fishing yields, agricultural production and tourism. The impacts were valued using market prices (where available) and published data on yields and productivity. A risk assessment was carried out for the species, on the basis of both natural and structural (political) risks. This identified a number of countries at significant risk of invasion by the species considered, including invasion of Salvinia into Mali and Nigeria. Further spread within the Senegal was also noted to be a significant risk. A number of potential management methods are investigated, including chemical, mechanical and biological control. Cost-benefit analyses of management methods are presented. The effectiveness of management measures is expected to increase if a variety of methods are used in conjunction as part of an integrated weed management plan. Management costs per hectare varied from approximately US$11 to US$4000. Low management costs may be partly due to the assumption that labour has a very low opportunity cost in regions where unemployment is high. However, this disguises the fact that labour availability for other domestic chores is reduced when labour is required for weed management activities. Prevention measures to avoid weed infestation are examined, including legislative measures,
quarantine controls, education and community participation, monitoring and early detection and contingency planning. Although little evidence of the cost and effectiveness of these measures was available in the literature, it was generally acknowledged that prevention of invasion was more cost effective than management of established weed populations. Annual prevention costs of less than US$2 per hectare are estimated for capital-intensive methods of monitoring and early detection to avoid establishment of weed infestations.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Doeleman, 1990",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Kariba weed,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,,N,Asia,Sri Lanka,,Sri Lanka,Unit (4 ha),1980,Period,1980,1980,1980,1980,One-time,75000,,,13492.09109,,75000,13492.09109,,LKR,1980,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of 80 people for one month to control Salvina and follow up maintenance with two people,Desika Moodley,
SC687,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,River Basin,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Zec Es1140011 Gandaras De Budiño,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,75000,,,86459.73714,113006.545,75000,86459.73714,113006.545,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Founds: 20 % Autonomous region, 80% FEDER",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC689,GS,,"Economic appraisal of the public control and prevention strategy against the 2010 West Nile Virus outbreak in Central Macedonia, Greece","A. Kolimenakis, K. Bithas, C. Richardson, D. Latinopoulos, A. Baka, A. Vakali, C. Hadjichristodoulou, S. Mourelatos, S. Kalaitzopoulou, S. Gewehr, A. Michaelakis, G. Koliopoulous","Objectives
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of the public control and prevention strategies to tackle the 2010 West Nile Virus (WNV) outbreak in the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Efficiency is examined on the basis of the public prevention costs incurred and their potential in justifying the costs arising from health and nuisance impacts in the succeeding years.

Study design
Economic appraisal of public health management interventions.

Methods
Prevention and control cost categories including control programmes, contingency planning and blood safety testing, are analyzed based on market prices. A separate cost of illness approach is conducted for the estimation of medical costs and productivity losses from 2010 to 2013 and for the calculation of averted health impacts. The averted mosquito nuisance costs to households are estimated on the basis of a contingent valuation study. Based on these findings, a limited cost-benefit analysis is employed in order to evaluate the economic efficiency of these strategies in 2010–2013.

Results
Results indicate that cost of illness and prevention costs fell significantly in the years following the 2010 outbreak, also as a result of the epidemic coming under control. According to the contingent valuation survey, the annual average willingness to pay to eliminate the mosquito problem in the study area ranged between 22 and 27 € per household. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that the aggregate benefit of implementing the previous 3-year strategy creates a net socio-economic benefit in 2013. However the spread of the WNV epidemic and the overall socio-economic consequences, had the various costs not been employed, remain unpredictable and extremely difficult to calculate.

Conclusions
The application of a post epidemic strategy appears to be of utmost importance for public health safety. An updated well designed survey is needed for a more precise definition of the optimum prevention policies and levels and for the establishment of the various cost/benefit parameters.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Greece,Macedonia,Region Of Central Macedonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,One-time,76811,,,107340.1466,128026.346,76811,107340.1466,128026.346,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC693,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,77600,,,87864.71481,114842.9104,77600,87864.71481,114842.9104,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC703,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Venerida,Cyrenidae,Corbicula,Corbicula fluminea,,Asian clam,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,83576.63,,,94631.91701,123687.9309,83576.63,94631.91701,123687.9309,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,SC703(NE67),no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC708,TC,SP_63,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,Ailanthus altissima,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Navarra,Zec Sierra De Codes/natural Reserve Peñalabeja,Site,12 years,Period,2008,2020,2008,2020,One-time,84000,,,95111.28923,124314.4907,6461.538462,7316.253018,9562.65313,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC711,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,arable fields,12b,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,85489,,,148489.7763,136835.6159,85489,148489.7763,136835.6159,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp80: cost of controlling (harassing) Canada geese in arable fields. Cost given for England only, but ""most agricultural damage and cost occurs in England"" so this estimate also reflects cost for whole GB (England/Scotland/Wales).",Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC716,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Lythraceae,Lythrum,Lythrum salicaria,,purple loosestrife,Semi-Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,10,N,North America,Canada,,Ontario,Site,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,90000,,,78100.75552,99765.45149,90000,78100.75552,99765.45149,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The data originate from a pers. Com whih cannot be checked.,Andrew Kramer,
SC718,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,River tamarid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,90000,,,6248.778416,15629.60231,4500,312.4389208,781.4801153,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC721,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,90052,,,156415.4608,144139.2563,90052,156415.4608,144139.2563,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Mink and water vole.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC723,,Hushack1995,Water user expenditures on zebra mussel monitoring and control,"Hushak, Deng, Bielen","[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The zebra mussel infestation has imposed large costs on facilities that draw water from the Great Lakes, such as electric generating plants, municipal water systems, and industrial water users. In 1989, for example, the largest fossil-fueled plant in the world, Detroit Edison’s power plant in Monroe, Michigan, had to shut down because this pinky-sized animal had literally plugged up the water system. Many of these facilities, therefore, along with research organizations, universities, and federal and state agencies have undertaken research to control zebra mussels. Policymakers, resource managers, researchers, and others need to be aware of these research efforts and of the monetary costs of effective mussel control.
To date there has been little systematic information to identify the infested facilities, the costs of monitoring the infestations, and whether the best methods are being used to minimize these costs. Several early estimates of damages were large but were made with limited knowledge about the animal causing the damage and without consideration of the effects that new research and outreach knowledge would have in reducing costs. There were several major facility shut downs and there were many reports of boat damages. These damages would have been incurred by more facilities or boaters if word had not been spread by Sea Grant and others. Ohio Sea Grant is supporting this research project to investigate these costs. Data for this project is being obtained-through two-surveys: one of Great Lakes water users, the other of zebra mussel research investigators. These surveys document the cost of controlling zebra mussels to water intake facilities and document research to mitigate these costs. The long term goal of this study is to estimate the economic outlays and returns for zebra mussel mitigation strategies and technologies.
This progress report contains preliminary results of the water users survey. Three mailings went to 1,500 facility addresses in November and December 1994 from which 398 usable responses were received. Another 165 questionnaires were received from facilities who did not use raw surface water, using either well-water or purchasing water from a municipal water system. Eighty-two were returned as not deliverable. We are conducting a follow-up survey of about 100 of the remaining 854 facilities to estimate the number of raw water users by type, location, and zebra mussel infestation. In addition, few large water users that have been heavily impacted by zebra mussels as reported at earlier conferences and workshops have responded to this survey. We are making an additional attempt to obtain data from more of these facilities.
All results reported are limited to respondents only; Great Lakes estimates will be the subject of a later report. In most cases, the total respondents do not add to 398 because some respondents omitted the information being discussed.
Table 1 shows responding facilities by type of facility and source of water. For example, 108 respondents are municipal water systems, 61 of which draw water from one of the Great Lakes. There are two features of this sample that add to the original objectives of the re- search. First, 74 of the respondents (19%) are located on inland lakes or streams giving us a reading on inland water facility behavior. Second, 177 (45% of respondents) are industrial facilities with surface water intakes, which expands our investigation beyond the proposed electric utility and municipal water system targets.
About 37 percent of respondents (145) have detected zebra mussels at their facilities, but only 119 of these are incurring monitoring or
",1995,English,Report,"Dextrase2002 (Preventing the introduction and spread of alien aquatic species in the Great Lakes; chapter in Claudi et al. 2002 Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests)",Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Great Lakes,11,NA,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Great Lakes,Regional,1989,Year,1989,1989,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,91200,51800,118400,146701.7784,,91200,146701.7784,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Based on up to 398 respondents to a survey. Ranges given for each year across Tables 3, 4 and 6 - which group results by water source, type of facility and size of facility respectively. Different number of respondents in each table, so estimates slightly differ.",Nigel Taylor,
SC727,,Olden2014,Incentivizing the Public to Support Invasive Species Management: Eurasian Milfoil Reduces Lakefront Property Values,Olden  JD  Tamayo  M,"Economic evaluations of invasive species are essential for providing comprehensive assessments of the benefits and costs of publicly-funded management activities, yet many previous investigations have focused narrowly on expenditures to control spread and infestation. We use hedonic modeling to evaluate the economic effects of Eurasian milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) invasions on lakefront property values of single-family homes in an urban-suburban landscape. Milfoil often forms dense canopies at the water surface, diminishing the value of ecosystem services (e.g., recreation, fishing) and necessitating expensive control and management efforts. We compare 1,258 lakeshore property sale transactions (1995–2006) in 17 lakes with milfoil and 24 un-invaded lakes in King County, Washington (USA). After accounting for structural (e.g., house size), locational (e.g., boat launch), and environmental characteristics (e.g., water clarity) of lakes, we found that milfoil has a significant negative effect on property sales price ($94,385 USD lower price), corresponding to a 19% decline in mean property values. The aggregate cost of milfoil invading one additional lake in the study area is, on average, $377,542 USD per year. Our study illustrates that invasive aquatic plants can significantly impact property values (and associated losses in property taxes that reduce local government revenue), justifying the need for management strategies that prevent and control invasions. We recommend coordinated efforts across Lake Management Districts to focus institutional support, funding, and outreach to prevent the introduction and spread of milfoil. This effort will limit opportunities for re-introduction from neighboring lakes and incentivize private landowners and natural resource agencies to commit time and funding to invasive species management.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,North America,USA,Washington,"King County, Washington (17 Invaded Lakes, 24 Uninvaded Lakes)",Unit (lakeside property values),1995 - 2006,Year,1995,2006,1995,2006,Potentially ongoing,94385,92558,94670,114764.7234,114764.7234,94385,114764.7234,114764.7234,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The hedonic model comprised of lakefront property sales price as the dependent variable, which was deflated to 2006 property values (USD) using the house price index (purchase only) from the US Federal Housing Finance Agency."" Period of the costs is noted as 12 years.
The presence of Eurasian milfoil had a significant negative effect on property values; mean reduction in property values was $94,385 USD, ranging from 2$92,558 to 2$94,670 USD according to the top three competitive models (Table 2). Based on an average sale price of $502,313 across all study lakes, the negative effect of milfoil presence corresponds to a 19% decline in mean property values.",Jane Catford,
SC729,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Nymphaeales,Nymphaeaceae,Nymphaea,Nymphaea mexicana,,Mexican nenuphar,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,96027.72,,,108730.003,142114.7274,96027.72,108730.003,142114.7274,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC731,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Albania,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,151683.4514,2484.657609,100000,151683.4514,2484.657609,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC732,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Denmark,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,151683.4514,14594.73869,100000,151683.4514,14594.73869,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC733,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Finland,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,151683.4514,121339.9205,100000,151683.4514,121339.9205,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC734,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Macedonia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,151683.4514,5649.262093,100000,151683.4514,5649.262093,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC735,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Norway,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,151683.4514,11997.65134,100000,151683.4514,11997.65134,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC736,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,151683.4514,152593.5786,100000,151683.4514,152593.5786,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC737,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Asia,Turkey,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,151683.4514,,100000,151683.4514,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,
SC738,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Lythraceae,Lythrum,Lythrum salicaria,,purple loosestrife,Semi-Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,10,N,North America,Canada,,Saskatchewan,Site,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,86778.61725,110850.5017,100000,86778.61725,110850.5017,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The data originate from a pers. Com whih cannot be checked.,Andrew Kramer,
SC739,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,Andes berry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,2000,2011,2000,2011,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,118219.7002,275568.1804,8333.333333,9851.641682,22964.01503,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper it was considered ""Small distribution but not fully delimited; treatment effective"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons,
we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC741,,Eiswerth2000,"Potential environmental impacts and economic damages of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in western Nevada and northeastern California aquatic weeds, economic impacts, invasive species, recreation, MYPSP LAKE, MACROPHYTES, QUALITY Euras",Eiswerth ME Donaldson SG Johnson WS,"Eurasian watermilfoil, an aquatic invasive weed, has been identified recently at a number
of sites in western Nevada and northeastern California, including Lake Tahoe. Because Eurasian
watermilfoil is easily spread by fragments, transport on boats and boating equipment plays a key
role in contaminating new water bodies. This is an important means of the potential spread of this
weed throughout key recreational and agricultural areas surrounding Lake Tahoe. Unless the weed
is controlled, significant alterations of aquatic ecosystems, with associated degradation of natural
resources and economic damages to human uses of those resources, may occur. This research uses
the economic valuation approach known as benefits transfer to estimate the value of a portion of the
recreational service flows that society currently enjoys in the Truckee River watershed below Lake
Tahoe. The lower-bound estimates of baseline water-based recreation value at a subset of sites in the
watershed range from $30 to $45 million/yr. Impacts from the continued spread of Eurasian watermilfoil
in the watershed could be significant; for example, even a 1% decrease in recreation values
would correspond to roughly $500,000/yr as a lower bound.",2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian Watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,,Lake Tahoe,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,142345.8672,142345.8672,100000,142345.8672,142345.8672,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,control costs by property owners,Phillip Haubrock,
SC742,,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,,Washington,Site,1987,Year,1987,1987,1987,1987,One-time,100000,,,125514.6149,125514.6149,100000,125514.6149,125514.6149,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,annual  operating  costs  for  mitigation,Phillip Haubrock,
SC743,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales,Site,5 years,Period,2010,Unspecified,2010,2014,One-time,100000,,,173694.5996,160062.2488,20000,34738.91992,32012.44977,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.3 Environment Agency funding: Japanese knotweed biocontrol project,Nigel Taylor,No
SC744,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,5 years,Period,2004,2008,2004,2008,One-time,100000,,,173694.5996,160062.2488,20000,34738.91992,32012.44977,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.10: Other Funding Sources: Hebridean mink contribution. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database. (Location = England, as funder is based in England https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esm%C3%A9e_Fairbairn_Foundation).",Nigel Taylor,No
SC745,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Ascidiacea,Aplousobranchia,Didemnidae,Didemnum,Didemnum vexillum,,compound sea squirt,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,100000,,,173694.5996,160062.2488,100000,173694.5996,160062.2488,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp158: ""All current costs of carpet sea squirt (Didemnum vexillum) control are assumed to ultimately be for conservation, as the main motivation for the control measures appears to be to protect native ecosystems (£100,000; case study).""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC746,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,101974.2,,,115463.067,150915.1278,101974.2,115463.067,150915.1278,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES). It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC747,Go,,"Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of Risk Assessments: Final Report (year 2). Risk assessment template developed under the ""Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of risk assessments to tackle priority species and enhance prevention"" Contract No 07.0202/2017/763379/ETU/ENV.D.2","Marika Galanidi, Argyro Zenetos, Daniel S. Chapman",-,2018,English,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Tetraodontiformes,Tetraodontidae,Lagocephalus,Lagocephalus sceleratus,,silver-cheeked toadfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,Cyprus,,Mediterranean,Country,2012,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,102480,,,140568.6417,154784.4234,102480,140568.6417,154784.4234,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"population control campaigns with intensive targeted fishery of the breeding population of the species in the summer months have taken place in Cyprus in 2012-2016. 
The amount paid to beneficiaries was €3/kg and it amounted to €600K in 5 years through a management plan partly covered by European fisheries funds [€102480 (34160 kg) in 2012, €43.800 in 2013, €164.940 (54.980 kg) in 2014, €249.465 (83.155 kg) in 2015, €41.235 (13.745 kg) in 2016] (DFMR Cyprus 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016).",Melina Kouranditou,No
SC748,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,102900,,,174602.6314,174602.6314,102900,174602.6314,174602.6314,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Soil and water conservation costs (i.e direct costs) from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC749,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,102914.91,,,179782.3484,179782.3484,102914.91,179782.3484,179782.3484,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Reductions in soil and water conservation benefits from leafy spurge-infested wildland. Direct economic impacts from soil and water conservation represent changes in expenditures to prevent or counteract damage from pollutants. Direct economic impacts from reduced soil and water conservation benefits were allocated to the Government, Agriculture-Crops, and Electricity Generation sectors.",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC751,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2011-2014,Period,2011,2014,2011,2014,One-time,103201.3669,,,141958.2586,161326.3865,25800.34172,35489.56465,40331.59663,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink. Founds: MITECO. They work at the national level, in various Autonomous Communities, in the distribution area of the European mink:  Ebro Basin from Burgos to Zaragoza. Cantabric River Basins in the Basque Country.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC752,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,105000,,,183424.7981,183424.7981,105000,183424.7981,183424.7981,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The total annual indirect costs of leafy spurge, which included $33,000 in lost income in the Households sector, $23,000 in lost retail activity in the Retail Trade sector, and $18,000 in the Agricultural Processing and Miscellaneous Manufacturing sector.""",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC753,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Brassicales,Brassicaceae,Lepidium,Lepidium latifolium,,Perennial pepperweed,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,110000,,,117438.452,117438.452,110000,117438.452,117438.452,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC755,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Gliridae,Glis,Glis glis,,edible dormouse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,114000,,,198011.8436,182470.9637,114000,198011.8436,182470.9637,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp125. Dormouse only occurs in England (not Scotland or Wales).,Nigel Taylor,No
SC756,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio jacobaea,,Tansy ragwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,115000,,,122776.5635,122776.5635,115000,122776.5635,122776.5635,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC758,GS,,"Economic appraisal of the public control and prevention strategy against the 2010 West Nile Virus outbreak in Central Macedonia, Greece","A. Kolimenakis, K. Bithas, C. Richardson, D. Latinopoulos, A. Baka, A. Vakali, C. Hadjichristodoulou, S. Mourelatos, S. Kalaitzopoulou, S. Gewehr, A. Michaelakis, G. Koliopoulous","Objectives
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of the public control and prevention strategies to tackle the 2010 West Nile Virus (WNV) outbreak in the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Efficiency is examined on the basis of the public prevention costs incurred and their potential in justifying the costs arising from health and nuisance impacts in the succeeding years.

Study design
Economic appraisal of public health management interventions.

Methods
Prevention and control cost categories including control programmes, contingency planning and blood safety testing, are analyzed based on market prices. A separate cost of illness approach is conducted for the estimation of medical costs and productivity losses from 2010 to 2013 and for the calculation of averted health impacts. The averted mosquito nuisance costs to households are estimated on the basis of a contingent valuation study. Based on these findings, a limited cost-benefit analysis is employed in order to evaluate the economic efficiency of these strategies in 2010–2013.

Results
Results indicate that cost of illness and prevention costs fell significantly in the years following the 2010 outbreak, also as a result of the epidemic coming under control. According to the contingent valuation survey, the annual average willingness to pay to eliminate the mosquito problem in the study area ranged between 22 and 27 € per household. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that the aggregate benefit of implementing the previous 3-year strategy creates a net socio-economic benefit in 2013. However the spread of the WNV epidemic and the overall socio-economic consequences, had the various costs not been employed, remain unpredictable and extremely difficult to calculate.

Conclusions
The application of a post epidemic strategy appears to be of utmost importance for public health safety. An updated well designed survey is needed for a more precise definition of the optimum prevention policies and levels and for the establishment of the various cost/benefit parameters.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Greece,Macedonia,Region Of Central Macedonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,One-time,118906,,,180360.7248,181688.6903,118906,180360.7248,181688.6903,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC759,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,119463.58,,,135265.8942,176798.2631,119463.58,135265.8942,176798.2631,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES). It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC767,,Brundu2014,"Plant invaders in European and Mediterranean inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats","Brundu, G.","The present brief and selective review
focuses on a set of invasive alien aquatic plant species
(notably the 21 listed by the European and Mediterranean
Plant ProtectionOrganisation, i.e., five A2 species,
11 invasive, 2 in the Observation List, 1 in the Alert List,
2 noteworthy), on definitions in use, on introduction
pathways, and ecological effects, although the social
and economic effects of freshwater invaders can be
diverse and substantial. Legislation, literature, and
scientific research dealing with plant invasions in inland
waters often merge different types of invasive plant
species and invaded habitats, as there are some
overlappings between the concepts of macrophyte,
aquatic plants, inland waters, wetlands, and riparian
habitats. Freshwater ecosystems may well be the most
endangered ecosystems in the world. Countless aquatic
plants have been introduced in Europe and in the
Mediterranean region, either deliberately because they
were thought to be ornamental or otherwise desirable, or
accidentally as releases from aquaria, dumping from
water gardens, or contaminants. The escape of alien
plants from managed environments is also frequent.
Aquatic invaders have strong negative impacts on native
biodiversity and many different impacts are reported in
the literature for Europe and worldwide. Plant invasions
in inlandwatersmay be considered as one of a syndrome
of factors that characterize degraded aquatic ecosystems.
There are a number of risk analysis, impact
assessment, ranking systems, decision trees, and prioritization
methods available throughout Europe and the
EPPO region, but the lack of a common framework for
assessing the risks posed by invasive alien aquatic
species is seen as a key gap. Successful management
should include prevention, habitat restoration, dedicated
risk assessment, prioritization, awareness raising, dedicated
legislation, collaboration between different
stakeholders, development of codes of conduct with
the horticultural sector, and prohibiting the sale,
purchase, and intentional release of some species in
the wild. Actions to protect the European and Mediterranean
inland waters from plants invasions are urgently
needed and could provide overarching benefits.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,Belgium,,Belgium,Unit (25 ha),2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,126000,,,192365.3644,175057.2427,126000,192365.3644,175057.2427,EUR,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"In Belgium, sums
of 140,000 and 126,000 euros were, respectively,
spent in 2005 and 2006 to clear 25 ha invaded with L.
grandiflora (De Bruyn et al., 2007).",Ross Cuthbert,No
SC769,TC,SP_63,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Robinia,Robinia pseudoacacia,,Robinia pseudoacacia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Quercus forests,1,Y,Europe,Spain,Navarra,Zec Sierra De Aralar/natural Reserve Of Putxerri,Site,12 years,Period,2008,2020,2008,2020,One-time,126471.54,,,143200.8479,187169.5843,9728.58,11015.44984,14397.66033,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC771,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,129999.99,,,147196.0315,192391.4589,129999.99,147196.0315,192391.4589,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,European mink conservation. Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC773,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Dendroctonus,Dendroctonus micans,,great spruce bark beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,1\2,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,130840,,,227262.0141,209425.4464,130840,227262.0141,209425.4464,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp93. Yield loss. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC778,,Stoneman2005,"The eradication of brown rats from Handa Island, Sutherland","Stoneman, J., Zonfrillo, B.","Burrow nesting seabirds declined after Brown Rats arrived on Handa Island some time after 1848. The eradication of Brown Rats in 1997 led to a rapid rise in numbers of some breeding seabirds while others increased their breeding areas or bred for the first time in living memory. The methods are based on modern commercial poisons and make the complete eradication of Brown Rats possible from the Scottish islands they have colonised, usually through the agency of man.",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Ratcliffe, N., Mitchell, I., Varnham, K., Verboven, N., & Higson, P. (2009). How to prioritize rat management for the benefit of petrels: A case study of the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man. Ibis, 151(4), 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2009.00949.x",Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,Brown Rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Rocky,6,Y,Europe,United Kingdom,Scotland,Handa Island,Unit (Island),23 - 29 March 1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,One-time,135960,,,241995.0896,218812.7664,135960,241995.0896,218812.7664,GBP,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"Costs provided per ha in Ratcliffe et al., 2009 and caluculate for Handa Island which is within a table in the report.",Angela Bartlett,No
SC779,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,137395,,,240015.7155,240015.7155,137395,240015.7155,240015.7155,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct economic impacts (reduced expenditures) from wildlife-associated recreation due to leafy spurge infestations on wildland. Were allocated to the Tourism and Recreation sector.,Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC780,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,137400,,,233142.8722,233142.8722,137400,233142.8722,233142.8722,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Wildlife-recreation costs (i.e direct costs) from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC781,TC,SP_58,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Área de Calidad de las Aguas, Comisaría de Aguas, Confederación Hidrográfica del Tajo",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Cuenca Hidrografica Del Tajo,Unit (River Basin),2018-2020,Period,2018,2020,2018,2020,One-time,137846.66,,,156080.6375,204004.0158,45948.88667,52026.87916,68001.33862,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This information was directly provided by the authorities, after consultation. This cost related to cleaning boats.",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC784,,Brundu2014,"Plant invaders in European and Mediterranean inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats","Brundu, G.","The present brief and selective review
focuses on a set of invasive alien aquatic plant species
(notably the 21 listed by the European and Mediterranean
Plant ProtectionOrganisation, i.e., five A2 species,
11 invasive, 2 in the Observation List, 1 in the Alert List,
2 noteworthy), on definitions in use, on introduction
pathways, and ecological effects, although the social
and economic effects of freshwater invaders can be
diverse and substantial. Legislation, literature, and
scientific research dealing with plant invasions in inland
waters often merge different types of invasive plant
species and invaded habitats, as there are some
overlappings between the concepts of macrophyte,
aquatic plants, inland waters, wetlands, and riparian
habitats. Freshwater ecosystems may well be the most
endangered ecosystems in the world. Countless aquatic
plants have been introduced in Europe and in the
Mediterranean region, either deliberately because they
were thought to be ornamental or otherwise desirable, or
accidentally as releases from aquaria, dumping from
water gardens, or contaminants. The escape of alien
plants from managed environments is also frequent.
Aquatic invaders have strong negative impacts on native
biodiversity and many different impacts are reported in
the literature for Europe and worldwide. Plant invasions
in inlandwatersmay be considered as one of a syndrome
of factors that characterize degraded aquatic ecosystems.
There are a number of risk analysis, impact
assessment, ranking systems, decision trees, and prioritization
methods available throughout Europe and the
EPPO region, but the lack of a common framework for
assessing the risks posed by invasive alien aquatic
species is seen as a key gap. Successful management
should include prevention, habitat restoration, dedicated
risk assessment, prioritization, awareness raising, dedicated
legislation, collaboration between different
stakeholders, development of codes of conduct with
the horticultural sector, and prohibiting the sale,
purchase, and intentional release of some species in
the wild. Actions to protect the European and Mediterranean
inland waters from plants invasions are urgently
needed and could provide overarching benefits.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Onagraceae,Ludwigia,Ludwigia grandiflora,,water primrose,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,Belgium,,Belgium,Unit (25 ha),2005,Year,2005,2005,2005,2005,One-time,140000,,,218612.116,197042.8632,140000,218612.116,197042.8632,EUR,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"In Belgium, sums
of 140,000 and 126,000 euros were, respectively,
spent in 2005 and 2006 to clear 25 ha invaded with L.
grandiflora (De Bruyn et al., 2007).",Ross Cuthbert,No
SC785,,18,Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for invasive alien species management under two different strategies: eradication and prevention,Garcia-Llorente et al 2011,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Pacific azolla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Site,10 years,Period,2004,2011,2004,2011,Potentially ongoing,140200,,,212660.1989,213936.1972,17525,26582.52486,26742.02465,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,,,No
SC786,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Aleyrodidae,Bemisia,Bemisia tabaci,,Tobacco whitefly,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,12b,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,1999-2003,Period,1999,2003,1999,2003,One-time,142164,,,246931.1906,227550.8954,28432.8,49386.23812,45510.17909,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Bemisia tabaci. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC790,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea moncktonii,,Knapweeds - Meadow,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,146000,,,155872.8545,155872.8545,146000,155872.8545,155872.8545,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC792,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Thysanoptera,Thripidae,Thrips,Thrips palmi,,melon thrips,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,2000-2003,Period,2000,2003,2000,2003,One-time,147630,,,256425.3374,236299.898,36907.5,64106.33435,59074.97449,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Thrips palmi. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC793,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1979,Year,1979,1979,1979,1979,One-time,148148,,,65702.00151,117672.4986,148148,65702.00151,117672.4986,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC795,,Eiswerth2000,"Potential environmental impacts and economic damages of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in western Nevada and northeastern California aquatic weeds, economic impacts, invasive species, recreation, MYPSP LAKE, MACROPHYTES, QUALITY Euras",Eiswerth ME Donaldson SG Johnson WS,"Eurasian watermilfoil, an aquatic invasive weed, has been identified recently at a number
of sites in western Nevada and northeastern California, including Lake Tahoe. Because Eurasian
watermilfoil is easily spread by fragments, transport on boats and boating equipment plays a key
role in contaminating new water bodies. This is an important means of the potential spread of this
weed throughout key recreational and agricultural areas surrounding Lake Tahoe. Unless the weed
is controlled, significant alterations of aquatic ecosystems, with associated degradation of natural
resources and economic damages to human uses of those resources, may occur. This research uses
the economic valuation approach known as benefits transfer to estimate the value of a portion of the
recreational service flows that society currently enjoys in the Truckee River watershed below Lake
Tahoe. The lower-bound estimates of baseline water-based recreation value at a subset of sites in the
watershed range from $30 to $45 million/yr. Impacts from the continued spread of Eurasian watermilfoil
in the watershed could be significant; for example, even a 1% decrease in recreation values
would correspond to roughly $500,000/yr as a lower bound.",2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian Watermilfoil,Aquatic,Aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,,Tahoe Keys Marina,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,150000,,,213518.8008,213518.8008,150000,213518.8008,213518.8008,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,costs of control machinery and work,Phillip Haubrock,No
SC798,TC,AR12,"Management of the invasive hill raspberry (Rubus niveus) on Santiago Island, Galapagos: Eradication or Indefinite Control?","Renteria, JL., Gardener, MR., Panetta, D., Crawley, MJ.",,2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,Hill raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Galapagos: Santiago Island,Unit (360 km),2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,One-time,154000,,,173113.7982,340517.3104,154000,173113.7982,340517.3104,USD,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC801,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,163790,,,286125.216,286125.216,163790,286125.216,286125.216,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct economic impacts (reduced expenditures) from wildlife-associated recreation due to leafy spurge infestations on wildland. Were allocated to the Tourism and Recreation sector.,Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC802,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,163800,,,277938.8826,277938.8826,163800,277938.8826,277938.8826,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Wildlife-recreation costs (i.e direct costs) from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC803,Go,,"Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of Risk Assessments: Final Report (year 2). Risk assessment template developed under the ""Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of risk assessments to tackle priority species and enhance prevention"" Contract No 07.0202/2017/763379/ETU/ENV.D.2","Marika Galanidi, Argyro Zenetos, Daniel S. Chapman",-,2018,English,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Tetraodontiformes,Tetraodontidae,Lagocephalus,Lagocephalus sceleratus,,silver-cheeked toadfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,Cyprus,,Mediterranean,Country,2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,164940,,,226882.6071,251254.7362,164940,226882.6071,251254.7362,EUR,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"population control campaigns with intensive targeted fishery of the breeding population of the species in the summer months have taken place in Cyprus in 2012-2016. 
The amount paid to beneficiaries was €3/kg and it amounted to €600K in 5 years through a management plan partly covered by European fisheries funds [€102480 (34160 kg) in 2012, €43.800 in 2013, €164.940 (54.980 kg) in 2014, €249.465 (83.155 kg) in 2015, €41.235 (13.745 kg) in 2016] (DFMR Cyprus 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016).",Melina Kouranditou,No
SC804,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Psittaciformes,Psittacidae,Psittacula,Psittacula krameri,,ring-necked parakeet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,2009-2010,Period,2009,2010,2009,2010,One-time,167000,,,290069.9813,267303.9556,83500,145034.9907,133651.9778,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Rose-ringed parakeets. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC806,TC,MarylandDNR2004,Potential Economic Losses Associated With Uncontrolled Nutria Populations in Maryland's Portion of the Chesapeake Bay,Maryland Department of Natural Resources,"Nutria (Myocaster coypus) are non-native aquatic mammals that are having an
unprecedented negative effect on the marshes and ecology of the Chesapeake Bay. Since
their introduction in the 1930's, nutria populations have continued to expand. With their
high reproductive rate and voracious appetite for marsh grasses and root mats, they are
now damaging hundreds of acres of valuable wetlands each year and turning oncevegetated
areas into mudflats and open-water. These denuded areas no longer provide
rich spawning and nursery grounds and habitat for the many species of shellfish, fish and
wildlife that this region is known for. Although the effects of nutria cannot be easily
separated from other detrimental factors, they are widely believed to be a large
contributing cause of the decline in the quality and extent of Chesapeake Bay wetlands.
As more and more acres of Chesapeake Bay marshes are lost, the resulting declines in
commercially and recreationally-valuable species takes a measurable economic toll on
the State ofMaiyland and its citizens. Commercial harvesting of shellfish and finfish,
sport hunting and fishing, and wildlife viewing in Maryland all have strong connections
to the wetlands of the Chesapeake and these sectors suffer as the marshes deteriorate. In
order to assess the economic effects this decline represents, this report analyzed scientific
literature, expert opinions and economic indices for commercial and recreational uses of
marshland and marsh-associated species in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay.
If marshes continue to be lost at the current rate, the financial losses to the State of
Maryland and its citizens are summarized in Table E-1 and E-2, below. In Table E-1, it
is clear that the direct losses due to declines in commercially and recreationally-valued
species alone are considerable annually and over the next 50 years. In Table E-2, it is
demonstrated that the losses in environmental services provided by wetlands, and the
associated social losses add another layer to the costs.   Taken together, the figures represented in Tables E-1 and E-2 present a challenge to the
State of Maryland and its citizens. These losses can be mitigated and lessened
considerably if marsh loss is slowed by removal of nutria. Otherwise, the economic
ramifications of damage to Chesapeake Bay marshes in the past and into the future are
costly and will continue to increase unless the necessary actions are taken. The costs of
nutria removal are potentially minor compared to the costs to the State if the loss of
marsh habitats continues unabated.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,nutria,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Maryland's portion of the Chesapeake Bay; emergent wetlands,11,NA,North America,USA,Maryland,Chesapeake Bay,Unit (part of bay),"""current"" + ""2001"" ",Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,168709,,,218938.7441,218938.7441,168709,218938.7441,218938.7441,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Environmental services loss in Table E2. Lost value, not necessarily cost of replacing lost services (see Conclusions).",Nigel Taylor,
SC815,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Brassicales,Brassicaceae,Lepidium,Lepidium latifolium,,Perennial pepperweed,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,182000,,,194307.257,194307.257,182000,194307.257,194307.257,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC816,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,2009-2013,Period,2009,2013,2009,2013,One-time,182682,,,317308.7685,292404.9174,36536.4,63461.75369,58480.98349,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.9 National Research Councils Funding: Expansion of grey squirrel populations. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC817,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,183067,,,317977.4927,293021.1571,183067,317977.4927,293021.1571,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Red squirrel (plus grey).,Nigel Taylor,No
SC818,TC,SP_63,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,River,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Navarra,Navarra Autonomous Region,Site,2005-2018,Period,2005,2018,2005,2018,One-time,184878,,,209333.1539,273607.3144,13205.57143,14952.36814,19543.3796,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Minimum cost, cost of administration personal have not been considered",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC819,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio jacobaea,,Tansy ragwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,185000,,,197510.1239,197510.1239,185000,197510.1239,197510.1239,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC821,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,187000,,,324808.9013,299316.4053,187000,324808.9013,299316.4053,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research cost for GB from Table 4.7, pp45. Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC823,,Horsch2009,The Effects of Aquatic Invasive Species on Property Values: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment,"Horsch EJJ, Lewis DJ","This study uses hedonic analysis to estimate the effects of a common aquatic invasive species – Eurasian Watermilfoil (milfoil) – on property values across an extensive system of over 170 lakes in the northern forest region of Wisconsin. Since milfoil is inadvertently spread by recreational boaters, and since boaters are more likely to visit attractive lakes, variables indicating the presence of milfoil are endogenous in a hedonic model. Using an identification strategy based on a spatial difference-in-differences specification, results indicate that lakes invaded with milfoil experienced an average 13% decrease in land values after invasion.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,Olden2014,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,"Eurasian milfoil, Eurasian watermilfoil",Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,North America,USA,Wisconsin,Northern Forest Region Of Wisconsin (>1800 Lakeshore Property Value Transactions Across 172 Lakes In A Single County); 17 Of The Lakes Were Invaded By Milfoil,Unit (lake),1997 to 2006,Year,1997,2006,1997,2006,Potentially ongoing,187600,,,228106.8191,228106.8191,187600,228106.8191,228106.8191,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The purpose of this study is to estimate a hedonic model of lakeshore property values to quantify the effects of a common aquatic invasive species—Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum, hereafter, milfoil)— on property values across an extensive system of over 170 lakes in the northern forest region of Wisconsin.The data used forestimation cover more than 1,800 lakeshoreproperty transactions across 172 lakeswithin a single county in the northern forestregion of Wisconsin. the dataset covers a period (1997–2006) thatcoincides with multiple lakes becominginvaded with milfoil.
The results from Tables 4 and 5 indicate
that lakefront property owners are willing to
pay, on average, more than $28,000 for a
property on a lake free of milfoil, all else
equal (depending on specification, results
range from $28,000 to $32,087). (p 407)
With thenonlinear model, the estimated marginal
willingness-to-pay depends on the value of
the other exogenous variables, and the
average varies across milfoil lakes from a
low of approximately $13,700 to a high of
$48,400.29 (p 407)
This amounts to approximately 8% of
total property value, or 13% of total land
value, net of the value of any structure. 
we can calculate theaverage annual marginal willingness to pay
as approximately $1,400 (assuming a 5% discount
rate). Multiplying the average marginal
willingness to pay by the number of affected
parcels on the average lake, we arrive at an
aggregate cost of milfoil of about $187,600/
year, on average, for one additional infested
lake. (p 407)
Results from the spatial difference-in-differences analysis indicate that a milfoil invasion reduces average property values by approximately 8%, and reduces average land values net of the value of any structure by approximately 13%. (Page 393)
The results from Tables 4 and 5 indicate
that lakefront property owners are willing to
pay, on average, more than $28,000 for a
property on a lake free of milfoil, all else
equal (depending on specification, results
range from $28,000 to $32,087). (p 407)",Jane Catford,
SC829,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Belarus,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,200000,,,303366.9029,1153560.109,200000,303366.9029,1153560.109,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC830,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Finland,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,200000,,,303366.9029,242679.841,200000,303366.9029,242679.841,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC831,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Greece,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,200000,,,303366.9029,305600.5421,200000,303366.9029,305600.5421,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC832,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,2000,2011,2000,2011,Potentially ongoing,200000,,,236439.4004,551136.3608,16666.66667,19703.28336,45928.03007,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper the eradication attempt was considered ""Permission obtained, all adults
killed, then permission withdrawn
by one landowner when density
fell to point where he considered
it not a problem compared with
damage caused by control team"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons, we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC834,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,200000,,,347389.1992,320124.4977,200000,347389.1992,320124.4977,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"River bank restoration cost for GB from Table 4.7, pp45. Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC840,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea moncktonii,,Knapweeds - Meadow,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,205000,,,218862.5697,218862.5697,205000,218862.5697,218862.5697,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC846,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,poultry farms,12b,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,England,England,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,77506,,,134623.7364,124057.8466,77506,134623.7364,124057.8466,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Table 5.14: cost of mink to poultry farms associated with killing of birds. Includes estimate for cost to Western Isles based on MacDonald et al. (2000) (pp77 in Williams et al.). Report also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC851,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Thysanoptera,Thripidae,Thrips,Thrips palmi,,melon thrips,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,2005-2009,Period,2005,2009,2005,2009,One-time,226007,,,392561.9537,361751.8867,45201.4,78512.39075,72350.37735,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Thrips palmi. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC853,,,"Meeting the requirements of the Biosecurity Act 1993: Economic evaluation of regional pest management strategy
for plant pests – prepared for Environment Canterbury.
Christchurch: Harris Consulting",Harris S,,2010,English,Official report,Saunders et al 2017,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella neesiana,,chilean needle grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4b\12b,N,Oceania,New Zealand,Canterbury District,South Island,Site,2010,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,232000,,,187915.0138,174311.8874,232000,187915.0138,174311.8874,NZD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Also estimated cost of doing no control and so net benefit (which might outstrip cost),,
SC854,,Hushack1995,Water user expenditures on zebra mussel monitoring and control,"Hushak, Deng, Bielen","[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The zebra mussel infestation has imposed large costs on facilities that draw water from the Great Lakes, such as electric generating plants, municipal water systems, and industrial water users. In 1989, for example, the largest fossil-fueled plant in the world, Detroit Edison’s power plant in Monroe, Michigan, had to shut down because this pinky-sized animal had literally plugged up the water system. Many of these facilities, therefore, along with research organizations, universities, and federal and state agencies have undertaken research to control zebra mussels. Policymakers, resource managers, researchers, and others need to be aware of these research efforts and of the monetary costs of effective mussel control.
To date there has been little systematic information to identify the infested facilities, the costs of monitoring the infestations, and whether the best methods are being used to minimize these costs. Several early estimates of damages were large but were made with limited knowledge about the animal causing the damage and without consideration of the effects that new research and outreach knowledge would have in reducing costs. There were several major facility shut downs and there were many reports of boat damages. These damages would have been incurred by more facilities or boaters if word had not been spread by Sea Grant and others. Ohio Sea Grant is supporting this research project to investigate these costs. Data for this project is being obtained-through two-surveys: one of Great Lakes water users, the other of zebra mussel research investigators. These surveys document the cost of controlling zebra mussels to water intake facilities and document research to mitigate these costs. The long term goal of this study is to estimate the economic outlays and returns for zebra mussel mitigation strategies and technologies.
This progress report contains preliminary results of the water users survey. Three mailings went to 1,500 facility addresses in November and December 1994 from which 398 usable responses were received. Another 165 questionnaires were received from facilities who did not use raw surface water, using either well-water or purchasing water from a municipal water system. Eighty-two were returned as not deliverable. We are conducting a follow-up survey of about 100 of the remaining 854 facilities to estimate the number of raw water users by type, location, and zebra mussel infestation. In addition, few large water users that have been heavily impacted by zebra mussels as reported at earlier conferences and workshops have responded to this survey. We are making an additional attempt to obtain data from more of these facilities.
All results reported are limited to respondents only; Great Lakes estimates will be the subject of a later report. In most cases, the total respondents do not add to 398 because some respondents omitted the information being discussed.
Table 1 shows responding facilities by type of facility and source of water. For example, 108 respondents are municipal water systems, 61 of which draw water from one of the Great Lakes. There are two features of this sample that add to the original objectives of the re- search. First, 74 of the respondents (19%) are located on inland lakes or streams giving us a reading on inland water facility behavior. Second, 177 (45% of respondents) are industrial facilities with surface water intakes, which expands our investigation beyond the proposed electric utility and municipal water system targets.
About 37 percent of respondents (145) have detected zebra mussels at their facilities, but only 119 of these are incurring monitoring or
",1995,English,Report,"Dextrase2002 (Preventing the introduction and spread of alien aquatic species in the Great Lakes; chapter in Claudi et al. 2002 Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests)",Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Great Lakes,11,NA,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Great Lakes,Regional,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,234866.6667,140300,364600,377799.9747,,234866.6667,377799.9747,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Based on up to 398 respondents to a survey. Ranges given for each year across Tables 3, 4 and 6 - which group results by water source, type of facility and size of facility respectively. Different number of respondents in each table, so estimates slightly differ.",Nigel Taylor,
SC857,TC,MX1,Optimal management of a potential Invader: The case of zebra mussels in Florida.,"Lee, DJ, Adams, D.C.; Rossi, F.",,2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Revollo Fernandez, D. 2019. Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",No,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Mejillon cebra,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Florida,"Okeechobee Lake, Florida",Site,2007,Period,2007,Unspecified,2007,2007,One-time,240000,,,283727.2804,283727.2804,240000,283727.2804,283727.2804,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC861,,Ciruna2004,The ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species on inland water ecosystems,"Ciruna, K. A., Meyerson, L. A., & Gutierrez, A.","Invasive  alien  species  (IAS)  and  their  effects  on  the  environment,  economy,  and  human  health  have   captured   the   attention   of   scientists,   natural   resource   managers,   and   policy   makers   worldwide.  Article  8(h)  of  the  Convention  on  Biological  Diversity  (CBD)  calls  on  member  governments  to  “as  far  as  is  appropriate:  Prevent  the  introduction  of,  control  or  eradicate  those  alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats, or species,” and calls for particular attention to be directed to geographically and evolutionarily isolated ecosystems, including islands. On behalf of  the  CBD  and  United  States  Agency  for  International  Development  (USAID),  the  GlobalInvasive Species Programme (GISP) convened a workshop in October 2002 to review the socio-economic and biological impacts of IAS on island systems.  Experts from 10 countries, as well as GISP,  the  World  Conservation  Union  (IUCN),  and  the  World  Conservation  Monitoring  Centre  (WCMC) participated.   Participants in the Experts Consultation reached the following major conclusions: For biological and  socio-economic  reasons,  islands  are  particularly  vulnerable  to  bioinvasions.    IAS  can  influence island environments at all levels of biological organization and also impact agriculture, fisheries,  tourism,  energy,  water,  and  human  health.    Lack  of  access  to  extant  technologies,  particularly in small island developing States (SIDS) has resulted in IAS impacts that might have otherwise been avoided.  While foreign aid can support IAS prevention and control efforts, it canalso facilitate IAS introductions.  Political pressure may exist to introduce IAS that will provide short-term  economic  benefits  regardless  of  the  longer-term  biological  costs.  Although  ballast  water  is  a  well-recognized  pathway  for  marine  bioinvasions,  ship  hull  fouling  by  marineorganisms is an often overlooked but significant pathway.   The  following  actions  were  recommended  by  the  workshop  participants:  Develop  informaticscapacities  to  increase  knowledge  of  and  access  to  successful  and  cost-effective  IAS  prevention  and  management  tools.    Establish  comprehensive  IAS  surveillance  programs  to  enable  earlydetection  and  rapid  response.    Undertake  further  assessments  of  IAS  pathways  and  impacts,  making  the  results  widely  available  to  resource  managers  and  policy  makers.    Implement  legal  frameworks  to  minimize  the  risk  of  bioinvasion  and  develop  alternatives  to  toxic  anti-fouling  agents. ",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Anoplolepis,Anoplolepis gracilipes,,Yellow crazy ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,11,N,Oceania,Australia,,Christmas Island,Unit (Island),2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,247000,,,235733.5837,234730.8761,247000,235733.5837,234730.8761,AUD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Expenditure aerial campaign of poisoned fishmeal granular bait (0.01% Fipronil),Phillip Haubrock,
SC863,Go,,"Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of Risk Assessments: Final Report (year 2). Risk assessment template developed under the ""Study on Invasive Alien Species – Development of risk assessments to tackle priority species and enhance prevention"" Contract No 07.0202/2017/763379/ETU/ENV.D.2","Marika Galanidi, Argyro Zenetos, Daniel S. Chapman",-,2018,English,Report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Tetraodontiformes,Tetraodontidae,Lagocephalus,Lagocephalus sceleratus,,silver-cheeked toadfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,Cyprus,,Mediterranean,Country,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,249465,,,286246.6995,389153.0652,249465,286246.6995,389153.0652,EUR,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"population control campaigns with intensive targeted fishery of the breeding population of the species in the summer months have taken place in Cyprus in 2012-2016. 
The amount paid to beneficiaries was €3/kg and it amounted to €600K in 5 years through a management plan partly covered by European fisheries funds [€102480 (34160 kg) in 2012, €43.800 in 2013, €164.940 (54.980 kg) in 2014, €249.465 (83.155 kg) in 2015, €41.235 (13.745 kg) in 2016] (DFMR Cyprus 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016).",Melina Kouranditou,No
SC864,,Nealis2002,"Gypsy moth in Canada: case study of an invasive insect. Pages 151-159 in Claudi et al. (2002) Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests",Nealis V.G.,"[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) is a native insect of Eurasia where it feeds on the leaves of broadleaf trees, especially oaks (Quercus spp.). Populations of gypsy moth increase periodically to very high local densities and severely defoliate preferred host trees (Elkinton and Liebhold 1990). In its native range, gypsy moth displays highly variable biological characteristics. The most significant life-history variations relevant to invasiveness are the geographic differences in flight capability of adult females and host food range of the larvae. Female moths from western (European) populations are flightless, while those from eastern (Asian) populations are capable of strong, directed flight. Gypsy moth larvae feed on a wide variety of mostly broadleaf tree hosts throughout their geographic range, but Asian populations also feed on coniferous tree species and therefore are of even greater concern to Canada than the European populations.
A European strain of the gypsy moth escaped from a laboratory near Boston, MA, in 1869. Since then, gypsy moth has spread and become established in the temperate forests of eastern North America, approximately between latitudes 36° and 47°N, and from the Atlantic coast to the Great Lakes basin as far as 90°W. During this same period, there have been repeated interceptions of both European and Asian strains of gypsy moth in western North America but, as yet (2000), neither strain is regarded as established there.
The North American experience with gypsy moth is an instructive case study of an invasive spe cies. There has been a well-documented public and scientific response to the problems caused by gypsy moth that can serve as a historical lesson for managing local and national environments in the global village. Scientific information on gypsy moth is probably as thorough as that on any invasive forest insect. Public policy on managing gypsy moth has ranged from neglect to aggressive mitigative action at considerable public cost and sometimes with dire environmental conse quences.
We can compare actions in the United States and Canada from distinct historical and legislative perspectives. As a case study in Canada, we can examine the impacts of establishment and spread of this alien species in eastern Canada and analyze the feasibility and benefits of maintaining gypsy moth-free regions by coordinating national and regional management activities. Discussion here emphasizes history and status of the European strain of gypsy moth now widely established in eastern North America and threatening to extend its range. Regulatory agencies now refer to this European strain as the North American gypsy moth, although it remains an alien species. Issues discussed here, however, pertain equally to the Asian strain of gypsy moth.
Attributes of an Invader
The gypsy moth has several biological and ecological attributes that favor its success as an invasive
species. Gypsy moth has a broad native geographic range that presents many potential sources of introduction. Also, the insect tolerates a wide range of climatic conditions and feeds on many different tree species. Thus gypsy moth has a high probability of persistence in temperate forests worldwide. The reproductive biology of gypsy moth also favors colonization. Adult females may produce more than 1000 offspring in a single egg mass, so even one female can contribute a sizable founding population.
The greatest limitation of gypsy moth as an invasive species is that it is a poor disperser over long distances. The female adult moth of the European strain is flightless. Natural dispersal is restricted to relatively short distance ballooning of newly hatched larvae (Elkinton and Liebhold 1990), making gypsy moth’s surreptitious association with humans significant. Many of the host plants that gypsy moth favors flourish in habitats associated with human settlement. Further, gypsy moths frequently leave their host plants to lay eggs in sheltered locations and these are often structures associated with humans, such as firewood and outdoor household goods. When these goods are moved, the gypsy moth moves with them. Thus, although some spread of gypsy moth along the margins of its range in North America can be accounted for by natural dispersal of small larvae, inadvertent movement of egg masses, by a mobile human population, is the source of most new infestations in areas remote from the established populations, particularly those in western North America.

",2002,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,trees,NA,NA,North America,Canada,British Columbia,Unspecified,Unit (Province),Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,250000,,,216946.5431,277126.2541,250000,216946.5431,277126.2541,CAD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp154 ""In British Columbia, the CFIA maintains its most extensive pheromone trap network usually of between 8000 and 10 000 traps per year. The cost of deploying these traps and collecting and recording their contents is approximately Can$250 000 (J. Bell, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, personal communication).""",Nigel Taylor,
SC865,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Gliridae,Glis,Glis glis,,edible dormouse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,forest/woodland,1\2,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,250000,,,434236.499,400155.6221,250000,434236.499,400155.6221,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Forestry,Communication/Damage-Loss/Research,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp90. All dormice in UK are in a small area within England.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC866,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Wales,Site,5 years,Period,2010,Unspecified,2010,2014,One-time,250000,,,434236.499,400155.6221,50000,86847.2998,80031.12442,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,Table 13.7 Welsh Assembly Government Funding: Japanese knotweed.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC867,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Plantaginaceae,Linaria,Linaria dalmatica,,Dalmatian toadflax,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,254000,,,271176.0619,271176.0619,254000,271176.0619,271176.0619,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC877,,Brundu2014,"Plant invaders in European and Mediterranean inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats","Brundu, G.","The present brief and selective review
focuses on a set of invasive alien aquatic plant species
(notably the 21 listed by the European and Mediterranean
Plant ProtectionOrganisation, i.e., five A2 species,
11 invasive, 2 in the Observation List, 1 in the Alert List,
2 noteworthy), on definitions in use, on introduction
pathways, and ecological effects, although the social
and economic effects of freshwater invaders can be
diverse and substantial. Legislation, literature, and
scientific research dealing with plant invasions in inland
waters often merge different types of invasive plant
species and invaded habitats, as there are some
overlappings between the concepts of macrophyte,
aquatic plants, inland waters, wetlands, and riparian
habitats. Freshwater ecosystems may well be the most
endangered ecosystems in the world. Countless aquatic
plants have been introduced in Europe and in the
Mediterranean region, either deliberately because they
were thought to be ornamental or otherwise desirable, or
accidentally as releases from aquaria, dumping from
water gardens, or contaminants. The escape of alien
plants from managed environments is also frequent.
Aquatic invaders have strong negative impacts on native
biodiversity and many different impacts are reported in
the literature for Europe and worldwide. Plant invasions
in inlandwatersmay be considered as one of a syndrome
of factors that characterize degraded aquatic ecosystems.
There are a number of risk analysis, impact
assessment, ranking systems, decision trees, and prioritization
methods available throughout Europe and the
EPPO region, but the lack of a common framework for
assessing the risks posed by invasive alien aquatic
species is seen as a key gap. Successful management
should include prevention, habitat restoration, dedicated
risk assessment, prioritization, awareness raising, dedicated
legislation, collaboration between different
stakeholders, development of codes of conduct with
the horticultural sector, and prohibiting the sale,
purchase, and intentional release of some species in
the wild. Actions to protect the European and Mediterranean
inland waters from plants invasions are urgently
needed and could provide overarching benefits.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,United Kingdom,,United Kingdom,Country,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,275000,250000,300000,561653.7606,543210.5931,275000,561653.7606,543210.5931,GBP,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"In the UK, the estimate for control of the total area infested by H.
ranunculoides by herbicides was between £250,000 and £300,000
per year (Harper, 2002). Based on cited EPPO PRA - could not access Harper (2002).",Ross Cuthbert,No
SC878,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Bignoniaceae,Dolichandra,Dolichandra unguis-cati,,Cats claw creeper,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,280000,,,19440.64396,48625.4294,14000,972.032198,2431.27147,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC879,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Viruses,NA,NA,NA,Poxviridae,NA,Squirrelpox virus,,Squirrelpox virus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,2007-2011,Period,2007,2011,2007,2011,One-time,281893,,,489632.9177,451204.2751,56378.6,97926.58354,90240.85503,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.5 Scottish Government Funding: Squirrel pox transmission. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC880,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,282317.8,,,318929.1044,440275.4082,282317.8,318929.1044,440275.4082,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax.(SUBSPECIES)  It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC885,TC,SP_62,Respuesta por email a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,Nicolás Cifuentes y de la Cerra- Jefe de Servicio de Aplicaciones Forestales. Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadiana- Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca- Alimentación y Medio Ambiente- Gobierno de España,NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Guadiana River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Guadiana Bassin,Unit (River Basin),2009,Year,2009,2009,2009,2009,One-time,298941.87,,,338485.0793,442414.3609,298941.87,338485.0793,442414.3609,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC886,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Montenegro,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,300000,,,455050.3543,898606.2964,300000,455050.3543,898606.2964,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC887,,Doeleman1989,Biological Control of Salvinia molesta in Sri Lanka. An Assessment of Costs and Benefits,"Doeleman, J.A.","In the mid 1980s the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) committed itself to a program of biological control of the aquatic weed Salvinia molesto in SriLanka. Salvinia in Sri Lanka interferes with irrigation and drainage of rice paddies, it reducesthe fish catch in water reservoirs and it also poses a health risk in providing additional breeding opportunities for mosquitos. The agent of biological control is a Brazilian weevil called Cyrtobagous solvinioe. Spectacular results with this beetle have already been achieved in Australia, Papua New Guinea and other countries following entomological work during the 1970s in whichthe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) played a pioneering role.This study estimates the economic benefits from the Sri Lankan program. A feasible rangeof net present values were determined over a forward-looking 25-year time horizon. At the midpointof the likely feasible range, the present value of salvinia control is A$16 million (433 million rupees) at 1987 prices. Considering both the Australian and Sri Lankan contribution to theprogram, the estimate represents a return of A$53 (or rupees) per dollar (or rupee) invested. When the same calculation is cast in terms of the value of Sri Lankan labour the ratio is boosted from 53 to a dramatic 1673.The research demonstrates: (a) an effective case of foreign aid; (b) the value of biological controlmethods; and (c) the role of publicly funded research in biological control.",1989,English,Official report,McConnachie2003,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Salvinia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,reservoirs and drainage systems,11,N,Asia,Sri Lanka,,,Country,1984-1989,Period,1984,1989,1984,1989,Potentially ongoing,302001,,,456172.9694,,50333.5,76028.82823,,AUD,1987,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,costs of biological control measures,Jane Catford,
SC890,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,305922.6,,,352666.5011,460950.0809,305922.6,352666.5011,460950.0809,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES). It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC892,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,310632.2,,,351163.914,483975.011,310632.2,351163.914,483975.011,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES)  It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC893,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,snowpeaks raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Floreana,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2007,2011,2007,2011,Potentially ongoing,312000,,,368845.4646,859772.7229,62400,73769.09291,171954.5446,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper the eradication attempt was considered ""Survey incomplete; control in progress. ""To facilitate comparisons, we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC894,TC,Flacio2015,Strategies of a thirteen year surveillance programme on Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) in southern Switzerland,Flacio et al.,"Background
In Ticino, a canton located south of the Alps in Switzerland, a surveillance programme on Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) started in 2000 seeing that the region was considered at high risk of introduction based on the rapid spread of this mosquito in neighbouring Italy.

Methods
The surveillance programme, which is still ongoing, was adapted continuously to handle preventive measures of arrival, dispersal and establishment of this invasive species. The monitoring was based on ovitraps supported by reports from the population. The integrated control measures included removal of breeding sites, larvicide applications with Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis or diflubenzuron and, in some circumstances, adulticide applications with permethrin. These measures involved citizens, municipalities and Civil Protection Units.

Results
Ae. albopictus was first observed in 2003 in Ticino. We describe the strategies adopted and their adaptations to the evolving problem since year 2000. The approach used allowed keeping the mosquito densities at tolerable levels and below the threshold of autochthonous Ae. albopictus borne disease transmission. During the surveillance period, new typologies of breeding sites for Ae. albopictus have been discovered.

Conclusions
It was worth tackling the arrival of Ae. albopictus and adopting immediate control measures, followed by regular control measures after its establishment. Early intervention and prevention of the possible spread of the tiger mosquito over the territory avoided facing a crisis situation. This also reduced the difficulty of managing the situation and probably also reduced the overall cost if this had not been put in place.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11\12,NA,Europe,Switzerland,Ticino,Ticino,Unit (canton),2nd period (2005-2008),Period,2005,2008,2005,2008,One-time,320000,,,343875.5539,267868.2302,80000,85968.88847,66967.05755,CHF,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Cost for second period. ""Cost factors may affect strategies applied for the surveillance and the control of the tiger mosquito [35,36]. In our case, the limited budget resources for salaries and materials, which reached at the beginning around 10,000 CHF/year and rose up to 8 folds in the 2nd period to 20 folds in the 3rd one, as well as the increasing amount of work, due to the spread of the tiger mosquito, prompted us to constantly rationalize the system and to outsource part of the work to the concerned municipalities during the 3rd period."" Additional info on Type_of_cost throughout paper.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC895,GS,Burnett2007a,Economic lessons from control efforts for an invasive species: Miconia calvescens in Hawaii,Burnett  K  Kaiser  B  Roumasset  J,"Once established, invasive species can rapidly and irreversibly alter ecosystems and degrade the value of ecosystem services. Optimal control of an unwanted species solves for a trajectory of removals that minimizes the present value of removal costs and residual damages from the remaining population. The shrubby tree, Miconia calvescens, is used to illustrate dynamic policy options for a forest invader. Potential damages to Hawaii's forest ecosystems are related to decreased aquifer recharge, biodiversity, and other ecosystem values. We find that population reduction is the optimal management policy for the islands of Oahu, Maui, and Hawaii. On the island of Kauai, where tree density is lower and search costs higher, optimal policy calls for deferring removal expenditures until the steady state population is reached.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Kaiser, B. A., Burnett, K. M., & Roumasset, J. A. (2006). Control of invasive species: lessons from miconia in Hawaii (No. 379-2016-21585).",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,miconia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,1,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Oahu,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,321000,,,402901.9138,402901.9138,321000,402901.9138,402901.9138,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Oahu Invasive Species
Committee allocated $321,000 to Miconia control in 2005",Melina Kouranditou,
SC896,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,322809,,,519038.922,488187.45,322809,519038.922,488187.45,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC898,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1978,Year,1978,1978,1978,1978,One-time,325203,,,144223.9382,258305.5428,325203,144223.9382,258305.5428,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC901,TC,,Quantification of the cross-sectoral impacts of waterweeds and their control in Ghana,Akpabey,"The Akosombo Dam on the Volta River in Ghana was built in 1963 to provide cheap energy to fuel industry and to accelerate the economic growth of the country. It provides hydroelectric power, enhanced fishing and water transportation upstream, and improved opportunities for irrigated farming, especially in the lower reaches, and their attendant economic multiplier effects. A few years after the construction of this major dam, a rapid expansion of industrialization took place in Ghana. This brought about an exponential increase in demand for more electrical power. This led to the construction of a smaller dam at Akuse, downstream of the Akosomho Dam in 1981 and the formation of a headpond at Kpong. The impoundment of the river at the two sites (Akosombo and Kpong) caused an alteration in the existing ecological and biophysical processes in the river basin, including a slowing of the flow of the river, upstream and downstream. Changes in the natural processes, such as a reduction in the flow of the river and an increase in nutrient status of the water, resulted in an invasion of aquatic weeds, increasing the density of aquatic snails (intermediate hosts of schistosomiasis), silting and closure of the estuary, as well as other more subtle effects. The invasion of the river's main course and the dams by aquatic plants led to a corresponding reduction of navigable water both upstream and downstream. The aim of this thesis was to quantify the impact and control of waterweeds, especially water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Mart) Solms-Laubach (Pontederiaceae), in Ghana. A floral survey on the Kpong Headpond recorded 49 emergent, 12 free floating and I submerged aquatic plant species, many of which were indigenous, but the exotic or introduced water hyacinth was recorded at most of the sampling sites, and was the most abundant and had the biggest impact on the utilization of the water resource. Mats of water hyacinth served as substrates for other, indigenous species to grow out into the main channel of the headpond, including the intake point of the Kpong head works of the Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL) and landing sites for boats. These mats resulted in a reduction of the fish (fin and shell) harvest, reducing the annual production to far below demand. Water hyacinth was also shown to have severe health implications. A survey of the Ministry of Health records showed that the prevalence of both urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis had risen significantly over time as the abundance of waterweeds, most notably water hyacinth, increased, and ranged between 70% and 75% but up to 100% in some lakeside communities. Based on the work done by an NGO on board the medical boat (""Onipa Nua ""), losses in III terms of money due to the effect on health of the aquatic weed infestations on the Volta River in 2006 amounted to US$ 620,000. Economic losses due to invasive alien aquatic weeds were also calculated on the Oti River Arm of Lake Volta. It was estimated that about US$2.3 million per annum would be lost to the Volta Lake Transport Company and individual boat transport operators if this section of the river were 100% covered by aquatic weeds (water hyacinth and Salvinia molesta D.S. Mitchell (Salviniaceae)). It was also estimated that US$327,038 was spent annually in monitoring and managing the weeds in the Oti River. Control interventions for aquatic weeds have been implemented in river systems in Ghana. The biological control agents Neochetina bruchi Hustache (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Neochetina eichhorniae Warner (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) have been used on water hyacinth infestations in the Oti River Arm of Lake Volta, the Tano River and the Lagoon complex in the south-western part of the country. Cyrtobagous salviniae Calder and Sands (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) has been used to control salvinia, and Neohydronomous affinis Hustache (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to control water lettuce, Pistia stratiotes Lilmaeus (Araceae) in the Tano River and Lagoon complex. Although these projects have been regarded as successful, they have relied on research from elsewhere in the world and no postrelease quantification has been conducted. In evaluating the impact of the biological control agents Neochetina bruchi and Neochetina eichhorniae weevils on water hyacinth infestations in the Tano River, fresh adult feeding scars were recorded as well as the numbers of adult weevils on each water hyacinth plant sampled at six sites. Despite being released in 1994, weevil numbers and resultant damage to plants in the Tano Lagoon was low in comparison to other regions of the world where these agents have been used. The main reason for this is that this lagoon floods seasonally, washing weevil-infested plants out to sea. Water hyacinth then re-infests the lagoon from seed and the weevil populations are low. To resolve this situation, two courses of action are proposed. The first is to mass rear the weevils along the shore of the lagoon and release them when the first seedlings recruit. The second proposal is that additional agents that have shorter lifecycies and are more mobile than the weevils should be released. To this end, the water hyacinth mirid, Eccritotarsus catarinensis (Carvalho) (Hemiptera: Miridae) was imported from South Africa and released onto the Tano Lagoon in 2009. IV Retrospective laboratory host specificity trials were conducted on Neachetina eichharniae and Neachetina bruchi weevils 15 years after their release into Ghana to see if any variation in their host ranges had occurred. Considerable damage was inflicted on the E. crassipes leaves by the Neachetina weevils, while little feeding damage was recorded on both Heteranthera callifalia Kunth. (Pontederiaceae) and Eichharnia natans (P.Beauv.) Solms (Pontederiaceae). All the weevils introduced on H callifalia and E. natans died after the first week. This study served to confirm the host specificity and thereby the safety of these agents. Invasive alien aquatic macrophytes have negative impacts on the environment and economy of Ghana. The control of these weeds is essential to socioeconomic development and improved human health standards in riparian communities. Biological control offers a safe and sustainable control option, but requires diligent implementation. However, aquatic weed invasion is more typically a result of the anthropogenically induced eutrophication of water bodies, and this is the main issue that has to be addressed.",2012,English,PhD thesis,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"Oti River Arm of Lake Volta, Ghana",11,N,Africa,Ghana,,Oti River,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2012,2012,One-time,327036,,,349150.9236,793107.8179,327036,349150.9236,793107.8179,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimates of baseline control and management costs of water hyacinth in the Oti River Arm of Lake Volta, Ghana.",Justice Tambo,
SC902,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,328069.7,,,573105.8903,573105.8903,328069.7,573105.8903,573105.8903,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Reductions in soil and water conservation benefits from leafy spurge-infested wildland. Direct economic impacts from soil and water conservation represent changes in expenditures to prevent or counteract damage from pollutants. Direct economic impacts from reduced soil and water conservation benefits were allocated to the Government, Agriculture-Crops, and Electricity Generation sectors.",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC903,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,328100,,,556726.1745,556726.1745,328100,556726.1745,556726.1745,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Soil and water conservation costs (i.e direct costs) from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC904,TC,SP_63,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink/other alien animal species,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,River habitats,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Navarra,Zec Rio Ebro (es2200040)/reservas Naturales Soto Del Ramalete (rn-32)/soto La Remonta (rn-33) Y Sotos Del Quebrado/el Ramillo Y La Mejana (rn-38) Y Los Enclaves Naturales De Sotos De Murillo De Las Limas (en-10)/sotos Del Traslapuente (en-11)/Soto De La Mejana De Santa Isabel (en-12)/soto Alto (en-24)/soto Giraldelli (en-25)/soto De La Mora (en-26) Y Soto De Los Tetones (en-28),Site,12 years,Period,2008,2020,2008,2020,One-time,331506.1,,,375356.8162,490607.2855,25500.46923,28873.60124,37739.02196,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC905,TC,SP_63,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Departamento de Desarrollo Rural y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Navarra",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink/others alien animal species,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,River habitats,11,Y,Europe,Spain,Navarra,Zec Ega And Urederra River/natural Reserves Nacedero Del Urederra And Barranco De Lasia,Site,12 years,Period,2008,2020,2008,2020,One-time,331506.12,,,375356.8388,490607.3151,25500.47077,28873.60299,37739.02424,EUR,2020,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa,Yes
SC908,,Hushack1995,Water user expenditures on zebra mussel monitoring and control,"Hushak, Deng, Bielen","[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The zebra mussel infestation has imposed large costs on facilities that draw water from the Great Lakes, such as electric generating plants, municipal water systems, and industrial water users. In 1989, for example, the largest fossil-fueled plant in the world, Detroit Edison’s power plant in Monroe, Michigan, had to shut down because this pinky-sized animal had literally plugged up the water system. Many of these facilities, therefore, along with research organizations, universities, and federal and state agencies have undertaken research to control zebra mussels. Policymakers, resource managers, researchers, and others need to be aware of these research efforts and of the monetary costs of effective mussel control.
To date there has been little systematic information to identify the infested facilities, the costs of monitoring the infestations, and whether the best methods are being used to minimize these costs. Several early estimates of damages were large but were made with limited knowledge about the animal causing the damage and without consideration of the effects that new research and outreach knowledge would have in reducing costs. There were several major facility shut downs and there were many reports of boat damages. These damages would have been incurred by more facilities or boaters if word had not been spread by Sea Grant and others. Ohio Sea Grant is supporting this research project to investigate these costs. Data for this project is being obtained-through two-surveys: one of Great Lakes water users, the other of zebra mussel research investigators. These surveys document the cost of controlling zebra mussels to water intake facilities and document research to mitigate these costs. The long term goal of this study is to estimate the economic outlays and returns for zebra mussel mitigation strategies and technologies.
This progress report contains preliminary results of the water users survey. Three mailings went to 1,500 facility addresses in November and December 1994 from which 398 usable responses were received. Another 165 questionnaires were received from facilities who did not use raw surface water, using either well-water or purchasing water from a municipal water system. Eighty-two were returned as not deliverable. We are conducting a follow-up survey of about 100 of the remaining 854 facilities to estimate the number of raw water users by type, location, and zebra mussel infestation. In addition, few large water users that have been heavily impacted by zebra mussels as reported at earlier conferences and workshops have responded to this survey. We are making an additional attempt to obtain data from more of these facilities.
All results reported are limited to respondents only; Great Lakes estimates will be the subject of a later report. In most cases, the total respondents do not add to 398 because some respondents omitted the information being discussed.
Table 1 shows responding facilities by type of facility and source of water. For example, 108 respondents are municipal water systems, 61 of which draw water from one of the Great Lakes. There are two features of this sample that add to the original objectives of the re- search. First, 74 of the respondents (19%) are located on inland lakes or streams giving us a reading on inland water facility behavior. Second, 177 (45% of respondents) are industrial facilities with surface water intakes, which expands our investigation beyond the proposed electric utility and municipal water system targets.
About 37 percent of respondents (145) have detected zebra mussels at their facilities, but only 119 of these are incurring monitoring or
",1995,English,Report,"Dextrase2002 (Preventing the introduction and spread of alien aquatic species in the Great Lakes; chapter in Claudi et al. 2002 Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests)",Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Great Lakes,11,NA,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Great Lakes,Regional,1991,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,339466.6667,219000,459300,546056.6196,,339466.6667,546056.6196,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Based on up to 398 respondents to a survey. Ranges given for each year across Tables 3, 4 and 6 - which group results by water source, type of facility and size of facility respectively. Different number of respondents in each table, so estimates slightly differ.",Nigel Taylor,
SC909,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Plantaginaceae,Linaria,Linaria dalmatica,,Dalmatian toadflax,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,341000,,,364059.2013,364059.2013,341000,364059.2013,364059.2013,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC912,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Buddleja,Buddleja davidii,,buddleia/buddleja,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,residential properties,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,348700,,,605673.0688,558137.0617,348700,605673.0688,558137.0617,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp127: Cost for control on residential properties. ""A residential property tribunal services report details a £375 bill for buddleia removal. Taking a conservative figure that of the properties, under disrepair in England, Wales and Scotland only one in 1,000 have a buddleia issue which is treated at a cost of £100, then the cost to England is £157,900, and to Wales is £9,800 and £181,000 for Scotland giving a total of £348,700 for Great Britain.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC913,,Doeleman1989,Biological Control of Salvinia molesta in Sri Lanka. An Assessment of Costs and Benefits,"Doeleman, J.A.","In the mid 1980s the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) committed itself to a program of biological control of the aquatic weed Salvinia molesto in SriLanka. Salvinia in Sri Lanka interferes with irrigation and drainage of rice paddies, it reducesthe fish catch in water reservoirs and it also poses a health risk in providing additional breeding opportunities for mosquitos. The agent of biological control is a Brazilian weevil called Cyrtobagous solvinioe. Spectacular results with this beetle have already been achieved in Australia, Papua New Guinea and other countries following entomological work during the 1970s in whichthe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) played a pioneering role.This study estimates the economic benefits from the Sri Lankan program. A feasible rangeof net present values were determined over a forward-looking 25-year time horizon. At the midpointof the likely feasible range, the present value of salvinia control is A$16 million (433 million rupees) at 1987 prices. Considering both the Australian and Sri Lankan contribution to theprogram, the estimate represents a return of A$53 (or rupees) per dollar (or rupee) invested. When the same calculation is cast in terms of the value of Sri Lankan labour the ratio is boosted from 53 to a dramatic 1673.The research demonstrates: (a) an effective case of foreign aid; (b) the value of biological controlmethods; and (c) the role of publicly funded research in biological control.",1989,English,Official report,McConnachie2003,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Salvinia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,reservoirs and drainage systems,11,N,Asia,Sri Lanka,,,Country,1987-2011,Period,1987,2011,1987,2011,Potentially ongoing,350000,200000,500000,25642.73159,,14000,1025.709264,,LKR,1987,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,"reported as ""other"", activities include power generation, transport, and washing and bathing.",Jane Catford,
SC915,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Scotland,Site,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,359107,,,623749.4658,574794.74,359107,623749.4658,574794.74,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,Table 13.6 Scottish Natural Heritage Funding: Mink eradication in Western Isles.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC916,,LSSG1999,Leafy Spurge Impact Assessment,Leafy Spurge Stakeholders Group (LSSG),[contains a lengthy executive summary],1999,English,Official report,Rempel2010,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,roadsides and railways,12,N,North America,Canada,Manitoba,,Site,1999-2009,Year,1999,2009,1999,2009,One-time,365000,,,361516.83,451043.6564,365000,361516.83,451043.6564,CAD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Economic impact of infestation on right-of-ways due to increased control costs; I put 2009 here because a new, updated report was published in 2010, so it makes sense to assume that those costs occurred until then",Marina Golivets,
SC918,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,370000,,,642670.0186,592230.3207,370000,642670.0186,592230.3207,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Research cost for GB from Table 4.3, pp41. Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC919,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,371237,,,644818.6208,594210.2907,371237,644818.6208,594210.2907,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp124: cost of ""non domestic, surface infestation control of rats"". England/Wales: £328,528 + Scotland: £42,709. Value repeated in Table 10.2 but rounded.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC920,,Olden2014,Incentivizing the Public to Support Invasive Species Management: Eurasian Milfoil Reduces Lakefront Property Values,Olden  JD  Tamayo  M,"Economic evaluations of invasive species are essential for providing comprehensive assessments of the benefits and costs of publicly-funded management activities, yet many previous investigations have focused narrowly on expenditures to control spread and infestation. We use hedonic modeling to evaluate the economic effects of Eurasian milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) invasions on lakefront property values of single-family homes in an urban-suburban landscape. Milfoil often forms dense canopies at the water surface, diminishing the value of ecosystem services (e.g., recreation, fishing) and necessitating expensive control and management efforts. We compare 1,258 lakeshore property sale transactions (1995–2006) in 17 lakes with milfoil and 24 un-invaded lakes in King County, Washington (USA). After accounting for structural (e.g., house size), locational (e.g., boat launch), and environmental characteristics (e.g., water clarity) of lakes, we found that milfoil has a significant negative effect on property sales price ($94,385 USD lower price), corresponding to a 19% decline in mean property values. The aggregate cost of milfoil invading one additional lake in the study area is, on average, $377,542 USD per year. Our study illustrates that invasive aquatic plants can significantly impact property values (and associated losses in property taxes that reduce local government revenue), justifying the need for management strategies that prevent and control invasions. We recommend coordinated efforts across Lake Management Districts to focus institutional support, funding, and outreach to prevent the introduction and spread of milfoil. This effort will limit opportunities for re-introduction from neighboring lakes and incentivize private landowners and natural resource agencies to commit time and funding to invasive species management.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian milfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,lake,11,N,North America,USA,Washington,"King County, Washington (17 Invaded Lakes, 24 Uninvaded Lakes)",Unit (lake),1995 - 2006,Year,1995,2006,1995,2006,Potentially ongoing,377542,,,459061.3256,459061.3256,377542,459061.3256,459061.3256,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The hedonic model comprised of lakefront property sales price as the dependent variable, which was deflated to 2006 property values (USD) using the house price index (purchase only) from the US Federal Housing Finance Agency."" Period of the costs is noted as 12 years.",Jane Catford,
SC921,,Wotton2004,Eradication success Down Under: heat treatment of a sunken trawler to kill the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida.,"Wotton, D.M., C. O’Brien, M.D. Stuart and D.J. Fergus.","Eradication of invasive species is difficult in the marine environment, and there have only been a few successes. We report the successful eradication of the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida from a sunken trawler in the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. New heat-treatment methods were developed as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable option to kill Undaria. Monitoring of the trawler for three years after it sank found no Undaria after the vessel was treated. Key factors in the success of the eradication programme included: early detection, a rapid response, pre-existing knowledge of Undaria, an adaptive management approach, targeting of multiple life history stages, and the cooperation of the vessel's insurer.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,Schaffelke2007,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Wakame,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,"21 m of water in sandy habitat, about 2.2
km from the nearest rocky reef.",11,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,"Hanson Bay, Chatham Island",Unit (sunken trawler),2000-2003,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,380000,,,221144.3465,356849.572,380000,221144.3465,356849.572,NZD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,treatment; insurance comparny for sunken trawler paid for all costs,Jane Catford,
SC924,,,Eradication of exotic Newcastle disease in southern California 1971-197,Anonymous,"The use of sentinel chickens in establishing the negative status of commercial poultry flocks depopulated due to exotic Newcastle disease (END) is considered to be an economically beneficial process. However, the costs and benefits of using sentinel chickens in noncommercial operations are in question. The objective of this study was to use sentinel chickens to evaluate whether adequate cleaning and disinfection coupled with an appropriate time period without susceptible poultry species on the premises would eliminate END virus from a noncommercial poultry operation and preclude the need for placement of sentinels in previously infected operations before declaring them free of virus. Noncommercial poultry operations were selected from the 2002 to 2003 END outbreak database. Operations included in the study had one or more isolations of END virus (ENDV) from cloacal or oropharyngeal swabs of birds on the premises. A total of 546 birds were placed on 53 premises. All sentinel birds sampled after placements were negative by virus detection methods and serologic tests. Results of this study indicate that time and the application of appropriate cleaning and disinfection procedures will adequately mitigate the risk of viable virus persisting in noncommercial poultry operations. In the future, this information may eliminate the need for sentinel bird placement to ensure virus free status of premises before repopulation, thereby decreasing the costs of END eradication.",1978,English,Official report,"McCluskey, B. J., Burgess, B., Glover, J., Kinde, H., & Hietala, S. (2006). Use of sentinel chickens to evaluate the effectiveness of cleaning and disinfection procedures in noncommercial poultry operations infected with exotic Newcastle disease virus. Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation, 18(3), 296-299.",No,Viruses,Negarnaviricota,Monjiviricetes,Mononegavirales,Paramyxoviridae,Orthoavulavirus,Avian orthoavulavirus 1,,Exotic Newcastle Diseases,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,Southern California,Site,1970s,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,1978,1978,One-time,385149,none,none,513200.7922,513200.7922,385149,513200.7922,513200.7922,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Camille Bernery,
SC926,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,Annual cost since 1991,Year,1991,2010,1991,2010,Potentially ongoing,395000,,,686093.6685,632245.8829,395000,686093.6685,632245.8829,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp157: ""Since 1991, various parties in the UK have funded eradication efforts, with a current annual cost of approximately £395,000.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC927,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,400000,,,606733.8057,610374.3145,400000,606733.8057,610374.3145,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC928,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Sweden,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,400000,,,606733.8057,49285.83546,400000,606733.8057,49285.83546,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC930,,18,Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for invasive alien species management under two different strategies: eradication and prevention,Garcia-Llorente et al 2011,,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,red swamp crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10,Y,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Donana,Site,10 years,Period,2004,2011,2004,2011,Potentially ongoing,400000,,,606733.8057,610374.3145,50000,75841.72571,76296.78931,EUR,2011,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,,No
SC932,,Fraser2016,"Economic evaluation of water loss saving due to
the biological control of water hyacinth at New
Year’s Dam, Eastern Cape province, South Africa","Fraser, G.C.G., Hill, M.P., Martin, J.A.","Water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes is considered the most damaging aquatic weed in the world. However, few
studies have quantified the impact of this weed economically and ecologically, and even fewer studies have
quantified the benefits of its control. This paper focuses on water loss saving as the benefit derived from biological
control of this plant between 1990 and 2013 at New Year’s Dam, Alicedale, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Estimates
of water loss due to evapotranspiration from water hyacinth vary significantly; therefore, the study used three
different rates, high, medium and low. A conservative raw agriculture value of R 0.26 per m3 was used to calculate
the benefits derived by the water saved. The present benefit and cost values were determined using 10% and 5%
discount rates. The benefit/cost ratio at the low evapotranspiration rate was less than one, implying that biological
control was not economically viable but, at the higher evapotranspiration rates, the return justified the costs
of biological control. However, at the marginal value product of water, the inclusion of the costs of damage to
infrastructure, or the adverse effects of water hyacinth on biodiversity, would justify the use of biological control,
even at the low transpiration rate.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,"New Year's Dam, Ec",Site,1990-2012,Period,1990,2012,1990,2012,One-time,402385,,,54255.75725,105646.1432,17495,2358.945968,4593.310575,ZAR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"Thus, the total cost of the control programme over
the 23-year period was an estimated R 402 385",Ross Cuthbert,
SC937,,Hushack1995,Water user expenditures on zebra mussel monitoring and control,"Hushak, Deng, Bielen","[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The zebra mussel infestation has imposed large costs on facilities that draw water from the Great Lakes, such as electric generating plants, municipal water systems, and industrial water users. In 1989, for example, the largest fossil-fueled plant in the world, Detroit Edison’s power plant in Monroe, Michigan, had to shut down because this pinky-sized animal had literally plugged up the water system. Many of these facilities, therefore, along with research organizations, universities, and federal and state agencies have undertaken research to control zebra mussels. Policymakers, resource managers, researchers, and others need to be aware of these research efforts and of the monetary costs of effective mussel control.
To date there has been little systematic information to identify the infested facilities, the costs of monitoring the infestations, and whether the best methods are being used to minimize these costs. Several early estimates of damages were large but were made with limited knowledge about the animal causing the damage and without consideration of the effects that new research and outreach knowledge would have in reducing costs. There were several major facility shut downs and there were many reports of boat damages. These damages would have been incurred by more facilities or boaters if word had not been spread by Sea Grant and others. Ohio Sea Grant is supporting this research project to investigate these costs. Data for this project is being obtained-through two-surveys: one of Great Lakes water users, the other of zebra mussel research investigators. These surveys document the cost of controlling zebra mussels to water intake facilities and document research to mitigate these costs. The long term goal of this study is to estimate the economic outlays and returns for zebra mussel mitigation strategies and technologies.
This progress report contains preliminary results of the water users survey. Three mailings went to 1,500 facility addresses in November and December 1994 from which 398 usable responses were received. Another 165 questionnaires were received from facilities who did not use raw surface water, using either well-water or purchasing water from a municipal water system. Eighty-two were returned as not deliverable. We are conducting a follow-up survey of about 100 of the remaining 854 facilities to estimate the number of raw water users by type, location, and zebra mussel infestation. In addition, few large water users that have been heavily impacted by zebra mussels as reported at earlier conferences and workshops have responded to this survey. We are making an additional attempt to obtain data from more of these facilities.
All results reported are limited to respondents only; Great Lakes estimates will be the subject of a later report. In most cases, the total respondents do not add to 398 because some respondents omitted the information being discussed.
Table 1 shows responding facilities by type of facility and source of water. For example, 108 respondents are municipal water systems, 61 of which draw water from one of the Great Lakes. There are two features of this sample that add to the original objectives of the re- search. First, 74 of the respondents (19%) are located on inland lakes or streams giving us a reading on inland water facility behavior. Second, 177 (45% of respondents) are industrial facilities with surface water intakes, which expands our investigation beyond the proposed electric utility and municipal water system targets.
About 37 percent of respondents (145) have detected zebra mussels at their facilities, but only 119 of these are incurring monitoring or
",1995,English,Report,"Dextrase2002 (Preventing the introduction and spread of alien aquatic species in the Great Lakes; chapter in Claudi et al. 2002 Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests)",Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Great Lakes,11,NA,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Great Lakes,Regional,1994,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,Potentially ongoing,420733.3333,262300,564500,676779.9149,,420733.3333,676779.9149,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Based on up to 398 respondents to a survey. Ranges given for each year across Tables 3, 4 and 6 - which group results by water source, type of facility and size of facility respectively. Different number of respondents in each table, so estimates slightly differ.",Nigel Taylor,
SC942,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Cygnus,Cygnus olor,,mute swan,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,1998-2008,Period,1998,2008,1998,2008,One-time,430000,,,746886.7783,688267.67,39090.90909,67898.79803,62569.78819,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Mute swan control research. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC943,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,432000,,,750360.6703,691468.915,432000,750360.6703,691468.915,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Local authorities cost for GB from Table 4.3, pp41 (repeated in Chapter 10). Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC944,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,Gorse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,441000,,,470821.4304,470821.4304,441000,470821.4304,470821.4304,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC945,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,houses/gardens,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,448000,,,778151.8062,717078.8748,448000,778151.8062,717078.8748,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Householder cost for GB from Table 4.3, pp41 (repeated in Chapter 10). Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC949,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,461000,,,805322.2087,805322.2087,461000,805322.2087,805322.2087,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The total annual indirect costs of leafy spurge, which included $140,000 in lost income in the Households sector, $95,000 in lost retail activity in the Retail Trade sector, and $88,000 in the Agricultural Processing and Miscellaneous Manufacturing sector.""",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC950,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,461000,,,782233.3631,782233.3631,461000,782233.3631,782233.3631,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Secondary costs from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC952,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea affinis,,Spotted knapweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4b,N,North America,Canada,,British Columbia,Site,1996,Year,1996,Unspecified,1996,1996,Potentially ongoing,470000,,,538678.0894,608096.618,470000,538678.0894,608096.618,CAD,1996,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Davies S, Gow T and Pidwirny M (1996) Living Landscapes. Knapweed. Royal British Columbia Museum and Okanagan University College, British Columbia;",Andrew Kramer,
SC953,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cereus,Cereus jamacaru,,Queen of the night,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,480000,,,33326.81822,83357.87896,24000,1666.340911,4167.893948,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC956,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2019,Year,2019,2019,2019,2019,One-time,497364.26,,,563154.2379,736066.4842,497364.26,563154.2379,736066.4842,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES). It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC957,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Moldova,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,500000,,,758417.2571,98439.44421,500000,758417.2571,98439.44421,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC960,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Littorinomorpha,Calyptraeidae,Crepidula,Crepidula porcellana,,slipper limpet,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,Menai Strait,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Wales,Unit (Menai Strait),Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,500000,,,868472.998,800311.2442,500000,868472.998,800311.2442,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp106: ""the Environment and Heritage Service are very careful about mussel movements from the Menai Strait, which costs one of the mussel companies, Deepdock Ltd, in excess of £500,000 per year, as they cannot move mussels to their finishing grounds in Northern Ireland (James Wilson, pers. comm.).""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC961,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,golf courses,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,500000,,,868472.998,800311.2442,500000,868472.998,800311.2442,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp109. Cost of management on golf courses. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC962,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,2003-2015,Period,2003,2015,2003,2015,One-time,500000,,,868472.998,800311.2442,38461.53846,66805.61523,61562.4034,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Japanese knotweed biocontrol. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC965,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Chenopodiaceae,Bassia,Bassia scoparia,,Kochia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"salt-affected lands, wheatbelt",8,N,Oceania,Australia,Western Australia,Western Australia,Unit (2480 ha),8 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2009,One-time,504472,,,574335.9526,462932.444,63059,71791.99408,57866.5555,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, table cites Dodd 2004 and Dodd & Randall 2002 and pers comm for source; used gross area for unit (area treated + area searched)",Jennifer Bufford,
SC967,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,514100,,,872334.4295,872334.4295,514100,872334.4295,872334.4295,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Soil and water conservation costs (i.e direct costs) from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC970,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,golf courses,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,528400,,,917802.2643,845768.9229,528400,917802.2643,845768.9229,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp109. Cost of management on golf courses. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC971,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,Gorse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,531000,,,566907.4366,566907.4366,531000,566907.4366,566907.4366,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC979,TC,MarylandDNR2004,Potential Economic Losses Associated With Uncontrolled Nutria Populations in Maryland's Portion of the Chesapeake Bay,Maryland Department of Natural Resources,"Nutria (Myocaster coypus) are non-native aquatic mammals that are having an
unprecedented negative effect on the marshes and ecology of the Chesapeake Bay. Since
their introduction in the 1930's, nutria populations have continued to expand. With their
high reproductive rate and voracious appetite for marsh grasses and root mats, they are
now damaging hundreds of acres of valuable wetlands each year and turning oncevegetated
areas into mudflats and open-water. These denuded areas no longer provide
rich spawning and nursery grounds and habitat for the many species of shellfish, fish and
wildlife that this region is known for. Although the effects of nutria cannot be easily
separated from other detrimental factors, they are widely believed to be a large
contributing cause of the decline in the quality and extent of Chesapeake Bay wetlands.
As more and more acres of Chesapeake Bay marshes are lost, the resulting declines in
commercially and recreationally-valuable species takes a measurable economic toll on
the State ofMaiyland and its citizens. Commercial harvesting of shellfish and finfish,
sport hunting and fishing, and wildlife viewing in Maryland all have strong connections
to the wetlands of the Chesapeake and these sectors suffer as the marshes deteriorate. In
order to assess the economic effects this decline represents, this report analyzed scientific
literature, expert opinions and economic indices for commercial and recreational uses of
marshland and marsh-associated species in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay.
If marshes continue to be lost at the current rate, the financial losses to the State of
Maryland and its citizens are summarized in Table E-1 and E-2, below. In Table E-1, it
is clear that the direct losses due to declines in commercially and recreationally-valued
species alone are considerable annually and over the next 50 years. In Table E-2, it is
demonstrated that the losses in environmental services provided by wetlands, and the
associated social losses add another layer to the costs.   Taken together, the figures represented in Tables E-1 and E-2 present a challenge to the
State of Maryland and its citizens. These losses can be mitigated and lessened
considerably if marsh loss is slowed by removal of nutria. Otherwise, the economic
ramifications of damage to Chesapeake Bay marshes in the past and into the future are
costly and will continue to increase unless the necessary actions are taken. The costs of
nutria removal are potentially minor compared to the costs to the State if the loss of
marsh habitats continues unabated.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,nutria,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Maryland's portion of the Chesapeake Bay; emergent wetlands,11,NA,North America,USA,Maryland,Chesapeake Bay,Unit (part of bay),"""current"" + ""2001"" ",Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,541079,,,702174.4941,702174.4941,541079,702174.4941,702174.4941,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Social losses in Table E2. Lost value, not necessarily cost of replacing lost services (see Conclusions).",Nigel Taylor,
SC981,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1990,Year,1990,1991,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,556000,,,1457679.058,1457679.058,777000,1457679.058,1457679.058,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct costs,Marina Golivets,
SC983,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Brassicales,Brassicaceae,Lepidium,Lepidium draba,,White top (hoary cress),Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,559000,,,596800.8607,596800.8607,559000,596800.8607,596800.8607,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC988,,Bangsund1993,"Economic Impacts of Leafy Spurge on Wildlands in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund et al,,1993,English,Official report,Stutzman2004,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,576000,,,1006216.035,1006216.035,576000,1006216.035,1006216.035,USD,1992,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""The total annual indirect costs of leafy spurge, which included $185,000 in lost income in the Households sector, $137,000 in lost retail activity in the Retail Trade sector, and $85,000 in the Agricultural Processing and Miscellaneous Manufacturing sector.""",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC989,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,576000,,,977367.4993,977367.4993,576000,977367.4993,977367.4993,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Secondary costs from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC991,,Coombs1996,"Economic and Regional Benefits from the Biological Control of Tansy Ragwort, Senecio Jacobaea, (Asteraceae) in Oregon","Coombs, E.M., H. Radtke, D.L. Isaacson, and S.P. Snyder.","Successful biological control of tansy ragwort in Oregon provides an estimated annual benefit of more than US$5 million, with a minimum benefit-to-cost ratio of 13:1. Losses of livestock have been reduced by $3.7 million/year. Additional savings have accrued through increased productivity of pastures ($1.27 million/year) and by reducing herbicide use ($0.85 million/year). Control of ragwort was achieved at a cost of about $5/ha. Non-market benefits include return of desirable flora in habitats once dominated by ragwort and a reduction in herbicide in the environment. Several correlative observations substantiate evidence used in estimating benefits of the regional control of ragwort. In western Oregon, control of ragwort reduced propagule production, which correlated with a decline in the number of new infestations in eastern Oregon, despite increased detection efforts. The number of releases of the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae, the ragwort flea beetle, Longitarsus jacobaeae, and the number of cattle deaths attributed to pyrrolizidine poisoning both decreased by more than 90% in relation to declining ragwort densities.",1996,English,Conference proceedings,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio jacobaea,,ragwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,Western Oregeon,Site,1 year,Year,1974,1974,1974,1974,One-time,592833,,,2947067.324,2947067.324,592833,2947067.324,2947067.324,USD,1974,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,total ragwort realted losses on agricultural lands,,
SC992,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2006-2009,Period,2006,2009,2006,2009,One-time,594513.92,,,947423.82,945346.7062,148628.48,236855.955,236336.6765,EUR,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Eradication plan of the american mink and recovery of european mink.  Founds: MITECO. They work at the national level, in various Autonomous Communities, in the distribution area of the European mink:  Ebro Basin from Burgos to Zaragoza. Cantabric River Basins in the Basque Country.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC993,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Bosnia and Herzegovina,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,600000,,,910100.7086,910422.1236,600000,910100.7086,910422.1236,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC994,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Greece,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,600000,,,910100.7086,916801.6263,600000,910100.7086,916801.6263,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC995,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Poland,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,600000,,,910100.7086,362951.1976,600000,910100.7086,362951.1976,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC996,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Asia,Turkey,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,600000,,,910100.7086,,600000,910100.7086,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,
SC997,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,rhododendron,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,1\2,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,600000,,,1042167.598,960373.4931,600000,1042167.598,960373.4931,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp95: £500,000 funding from Forestry Commission England + £100,000 from Forestry Commission Wales for rhododendron clearance to combat Phytophthora.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1001,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Scrophulariaceae,Buddleja,Buddleja davidii,,buddleia/buddleja,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,listed buildings,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,611730,,,1062541.974,979148.7949,611730,1062541.974,979148.7949,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Damage repair/Eradication/Monitoring,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp127: Cost for survey, removal and repair for listed buildings. ""Estimating conservatively that 5 in every 1000 vulnerable heritage building has buddleia and an average survey, removal, repair cost of £18,000 then the total spend in England is £146,790, Wales is £259,380 and Scotland is £205,560.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1002,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,One-time,611845.2,,,705333.0021,921900.1618,611845.2,705333.0021,921900.1618,EUR,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax (SUBSPECIES). It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC1005,,Hushack1995,Water user expenditures on zebra mussel monitoring and control,"Hushak, Deng, Bielen","[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The zebra mussel infestation has imposed large costs on facilities that draw water from the Great Lakes, such as electric generating plants, municipal water systems, and industrial water users. In 1989, for example, the largest fossil-fueled plant in the world, Detroit Edison’s power plant in Monroe, Michigan, had to shut down because this pinky-sized animal had literally plugged up the water system. Many of these facilities, therefore, along with research organizations, universities, and federal and state agencies have undertaken research to control zebra mussels. Policymakers, resource managers, researchers, and others need to be aware of these research efforts and of the monetary costs of effective mussel control.
To date there has been little systematic information to identify the infested facilities, the costs of monitoring the infestations, and whether the best methods are being used to minimize these costs. Several early estimates of damages were large but were made with limited knowledge about the animal causing the damage and without consideration of the effects that new research and outreach knowledge would have in reducing costs. There were several major facility shut downs and there were many reports of boat damages. These damages would have been incurred by more facilities or boaters if word had not been spread by Sea Grant and others. Ohio Sea Grant is supporting this research project to investigate these costs. Data for this project is being obtained-through two-surveys: one of Great Lakes water users, the other of zebra mussel research investigators. These surveys document the cost of controlling zebra mussels to water intake facilities and document research to mitigate these costs. The long term goal of this study is to estimate the economic outlays and returns for zebra mussel mitigation strategies and technologies.
This progress report contains preliminary results of the water users survey. Three mailings went to 1,500 facility addresses in November and December 1994 from which 398 usable responses were received. Another 165 questionnaires were received from facilities who did not use raw surface water, using either well-water or purchasing water from a municipal water system. Eighty-two were returned as not deliverable. We are conducting a follow-up survey of about 100 of the remaining 854 facilities to estimate the number of raw water users by type, location, and zebra mussel infestation. In addition, few large water users that have been heavily impacted by zebra mussels as reported at earlier conferences and workshops have responded to this survey. We are making an additional attempt to obtain data from more of these facilities.
All results reported are limited to respondents only; Great Lakes estimates will be the subject of a later report. In most cases, the total respondents do not add to 398 because some respondents omitted the information being discussed.
Table 1 shows responding facilities by type of facility and source of water. For example, 108 respondents are municipal water systems, 61 of which draw water from one of the Great Lakes. There are two features of this sample that add to the original objectives of the re- search. First, 74 of the respondents (19%) are located on inland lakes or streams giving us a reading on inland water facility behavior. Second, 177 (45% of respondents) are industrial facilities with surface water intakes, which expands our investigation beyond the proposed electric utility and municipal water system targets.
About 37 percent of respondents (145) have detected zebra mussels at their facilities, but only 119 of these are incurring monitoring or
",1995,English,Report,"Dextrase2002 (Preventing the introduction and spread of alien aquatic species in the Great Lakes; chapter in Claudi et al. 2002 Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests)",Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Great Lakes,11,NA,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Great Lakes,Regional,1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,Potentially ongoing,632533.3333,403600,867200,1017475.492,,632533.3333,1017475.492,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Based on up to 398 respondents to a survey. Ranges given for each year across Tables 3, 4 and 6 - which group results by water source, type of facility and size of facility respectively. Different number of respondents in each table, so estimates slightly differ.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1008,,Hushack1995,Water user expenditures on zebra mussel monitoring and control,"Hushak, Deng, Bielen","[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The zebra mussel infestation has imposed large costs on facilities that draw water from the Great Lakes, such as electric generating plants, municipal water systems, and industrial water users. In 1989, for example, the largest fossil-fueled plant in the world, Detroit Edison’s power plant in Monroe, Michigan, had to shut down because this pinky-sized animal had literally plugged up the water system. Many of these facilities, therefore, along with research organizations, universities, and federal and state agencies have undertaken research to control zebra mussels. Policymakers, resource managers, researchers, and others need to be aware of these research efforts and of the monetary costs of effective mussel control.
To date there has been little systematic information to identify the infested facilities, the costs of monitoring the infestations, and whether the best methods are being used to minimize these costs. Several early estimates of damages were large but were made with limited knowledge about the animal causing the damage and without consideration of the effects that new research and outreach knowledge would have in reducing costs. There were several major facility shut downs and there were many reports of boat damages. These damages would have been incurred by more facilities or boaters if word had not been spread by Sea Grant and others. Ohio Sea Grant is supporting this research project to investigate these costs. Data for this project is being obtained-through two-surveys: one of Great Lakes water users, the other of zebra mussel research investigators. These surveys document the cost of controlling zebra mussels to water intake facilities and document research to mitigate these costs. The long term goal of this study is to estimate the economic outlays and returns for zebra mussel mitigation strategies and technologies.
This progress report contains preliminary results of the water users survey. Three mailings went to 1,500 facility addresses in November and December 1994 from which 398 usable responses were received. Another 165 questionnaires were received from facilities who did not use raw surface water, using either well-water or purchasing water from a municipal water system. Eighty-two were returned as not deliverable. We are conducting a follow-up survey of about 100 of the remaining 854 facilities to estimate the number of raw water users by type, location, and zebra mussel infestation. In addition, few large water users that have been heavily impacted by zebra mussels as reported at earlier conferences and workshops have responded to this survey. We are making an additional attempt to obtain data from more of these facilities.
All results reported are limited to respondents only; Great Lakes estimates will be the subject of a later report. In most cases, the total respondents do not add to 398 because some respondents omitted the information being discussed.
Table 1 shows responding facilities by type of facility and source of water. For example, 108 respondents are municipal water systems, 61 of which draw water from one of the Great Lakes. There are two features of this sample that add to the original objectives of the re- search. First, 74 of the respondents (19%) are located on inland lakes or streams giving us a reading on inland water facility behavior. Second, 177 (45% of respondents) are industrial facilities with surface water intakes, which expands our investigation beyond the proposed electric utility and municipal water system targets.
About 37 percent of respondents (145) have detected zebra mussels at their facilities, but only 119 of these are incurring monitoring or
",1995,English,Report,"Dextrase2002 (Preventing the introduction and spread of alien aquatic species in the Great Lakes; chapter in Claudi et al. 2002 Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests)",Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Great Lakes,11,NA,North America,Diverse/Unspecified,Diverse/Unspecified,Great Lakes,Regional,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,649800,562700,801900,1045250.171,,649800,1045250.171,,USD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Based on up to 398 respondents to a survey. Ranges given for each year across Tables 3, 4 and 6 - which group results by water source, type of facility and size of facility respectively. Different number of respondents in each table, so estimates slightly differ.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1015,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,661600,,,1149163.471,1058971.838,661600,1149163.471,1058971.838,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp155: Control linked to red squirrel conservation. ""The annual cost of grey squirrel control as part of the red squirrel protection therefore is estimated at £611,600 (estimated division: £140,800 in Wales, and £235,400 each in England and Scotland).""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1018,,Wallace1992,Economic impact of leafy spurge on North Dakota wildland,Wallace et al,,1992,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,687954.12,,,1238189.027,1238189.027,687954.12,1238189.027,1238189.027,USD,1991,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Reductions in soil and water conservation benefits; wildland area 4899000 acres of which 467996 are invaded by leafy spurge,Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1019,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,"Isle Of Canna, Scotland",Site,3 years,Year,Unspecified,2010,2008,2010,Potentially ongoing,689184,,,1197075.389,1103123.409,689184,1197075.389,1103123.409,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management/Surveillance/Administration/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"pp157: ""In Scotland, on the Isle of Canna, rats predate seabirds. They are now controlled by baiting and quarantine procedures have been set up. A rat-proof waste management strategy was installed, long-term rat surveillance was introduced and a contingency plan was formulated to come into action in the event of a rat being accidentally introduced. The cost was £689,184 (including labour) over 3 years (Anon. 2008). The total annual cost therefore is approximately £230,000.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1020,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Sweden,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,700000,,,1061784.16,86250.21205,700000,1061784.16,86250.21205,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1025,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2017,Year,2017,2017,2017,2017,One-time,714635.6,,,807310.3854,1114476.241,714635.6,807310.3854,1114476.241,EUR,2017,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax.(SUBSPECIES) It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC1027,TC,SP_59,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Servizo de Conservación da Biodiversidade, Dirección Xeral de Patrimonio Natural, Consellería de Medio Ambiente, Territorio e Vivenda, Santiago de Compostela",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Vespidae,Vespa,Vespa velutina,Vespa velutina nigrithorax,Asian hornet,Terrestrial,terrestrial,NA,NA,NA,Y,Europe,Spain,Galicia,Espazos Rede Natura 2000,Site,2016,Year,2016,2016,2016,2016,One-time,723238.6,,,817607.761,1126829.123,723238.6,817607.761,1126829.123,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Monitoring,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The target species was reported as Vespa velutina nigrithorax. (SUBSPECIES) It happened inland and in island,Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC1034,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Dothideomycetes,Mycoshaerellales,Mycosphaerellaceae,Dothistroma,Dothistroma septosporum,,red band needle blight,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,1\2,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,756000,,,1313131.173,1210070.601,756000,1313131.173,1210070.601,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp96: yield loss. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1038,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea solstitialis,,Yellow starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,774000,,,826339.6533,826339.6533,774000,826339.6533,826339.6533,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC1041,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,786240,,,1365656.42,1258473.425,786240,1365656.42,1258473.425,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp156: Control linked to water vole/bird conservation. ""Therefore, using an average cost per mink of £514, the costs were estimated at £436,900 in England, £218,450 in Scotland and £131,070 in Wales, giving an annual cost for Great Britain of £786,420 on control measures alone.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1047,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Switzerland,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,800000,,,1213467.611,,800000,1213467.611,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1048,TC,Sandodden2010,Eradication of introduced signal crayfish Pasifastacus leniusculus using the pharmaceutical BETAMAX VET.®,"Sandodden, Johnsen","Signal crayfish Pasifastacus leniusculus were first discovered in Norway in the Dammane area of Telemark County in October
2006. This introduced population was found to be infected with the oomycete Aphanomyces astaci, the causative agent of
crayfish plague. The Dammane watershed consists of 5 small ponds, the largest with a surface area of approximately 2000 m2
.
The Norwegian National Veterinary Institute conducted a feasibility study for the eradication of the Dammane signal crayfish
population at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority and Directorate for Nature Management. This study
recommended the use of the pharmaceutical BETAMAX VET.®
, followed by pond drainage as a feasible course of action.
BETAMAX VET.®
is a cypermethrin-based pharmaceutical developed for treatment of salmon louse (Lepeophtherius salmonis)
infestations of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Cypermethrin is a synthetic pyrethroid and a common agent in many
insecticides licensed throughout Europe. Following a comprehensive mapping of the Dammane watershed, the ponds were treated
with BETAMAX VET.®
on the 14 and 28 May, 2008. Subsequently, the ponds were drained by pumping out the water in two
separate stages on 2-4 June, 2008 and 22-24 December 2008. During the first treatment with BETAMAX VET.®
, signal crayfish
were captured in the two upper ponds. During and following the second treatment and draining of the ponds, no signal crayfish
were found. The ponds were gradually re-filled with water during the spring of 2009. It is too early to conclude whether the
treatment has led to the complete eradication of the signal crayfish, but the results so far are promising. We believe that
BETAMAX VET.®
can be a useful tool in managing alien crayfish populations.",2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"The watercourse consists of
a creek with five small ponds, the largest
measuring approximately 2000 m2
surface area.
The outlet runs into the Frierfjord near the town
of Trosvik. The relatively warm coastal climate
and the limestone bedrock have led to a rich
flora and fauna. The watercourse includes five
artificial ponds, originally constructed for the
production of ice during the eighteenth century.
The small reservoirs were used, until 1970 as a
source of water for the city of Brevik. The
uppermost dam is situated 70 meters above sealevel,
whereas the lowermost pond is at an
elevation of 40 meters. Prior to the chemical
treatments, signal crayfish were only recorded in
the uppermost pond (pond 5, see Figure 1).",11,N,Europe,Norway,Telemark,Dammane Watershed,Unit (5 ponds),2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,800000,,,145355.0881,100642.6132,800000,145355.0881,100642.6132,NOK,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""Total cost for this project [including biocide application and setting crayfish traps] was 800 000 Norwegian kroner or approximately (95 000 Euro; October 2009 values). This does not include estimates of total water volume, and draining of the ponds.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1050,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,snowpeaks raspberry,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santiago,Unit (Island),2010,Period,2005,2011,2005,2011,Potentially ongoing,800000,,,945757.6015,2204545.443,114285.7143,135108.2288,314935.0633,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper the eradication attempt was considered ""Managers did not apply
recommended visit frequency; by
default became control program;
known distribution expanding;
control continues"" and the costs include the survey and/or control costs thus far. ""To facilitate comparisons, we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC1053,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Agavaceae,Agave,Agave americana,,Sentry plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,820000,,,56933.31445,142403.0432,41000,2846.665723,7120.152161,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1056,,7477,Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing: A case study from South Africa,"McConnachie, M. M., Cowling, R. M. van Wilgen, B. W.  McConnachie, D. A.","Conservation projects spend billions of dollars clearing invasive alien plants, yet few studies have measured the cost-effectiveness of doing this, especially over larger spatial and temporal scales, relevant to operational contexts. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of South Africa’s national invasive alien plant control programme, Working for Water, in reducing invasive alien plant cover in the Krom and Kouga river catchments over 7 years. We assessed change in invasive alien plant cover by comparing post-treatment cover with the first recorded pre-treatment cover across all 740 of the two project’s treatment sites (ranging from 0.03 to 227.6 ha in size). We also used regression analysis to estimate the effect of predictor variables on the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing. We found – by dividing the total costs by the change in invasive alien plant cover – that it cost 2.4 times more (1.5 times for the Krom, and 8.6 times for the Kouga project) to clear invaded land than the highest equivalent estimate made elsewhere. At current rates of clearing, it would take 54 and 695 years to clear the catchments, in the Krom and Kouga, respectively, assuming no further spread. If spread is considered, current control efforts are inadequate, and invasions are likely to continue to spread in the catchments. Pre-treatment invasive alien plant cover and treatment costs per hectare had the greatest positive and negative influence, respectively on cost-effectiveness. Our assessment suggests that invasive alien plant control projects urgently need to monitor their cost-effectiveness so that management practices can be adapted to use scarce conservation funds more effectively.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Kouga River Catchment,Unit (2426 km2),6 years (2002-2008),Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,850000,,,130510.7593,208860.1449,121428.5714,18644.39418,29837.16356,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Implementing agent levy costs,Desika Moodley,
SC1057,,Cacho2012,Valuing community engagement in biosecurity surveillance.,"Cacho OJ, Reeve I, Tramell J et al","Although there is evidence that passive surveillance services provided by the public can be very valuable (in terms of both reduced program costs and increased probability of success in managing pests) little is known about the return on investment for this type of expenditure. Enabling passive surveillance requires community information campaigns and incentive schemes. This takes funds away from other activities, so it is important to estimate the value of these campaigns relative to other alternatives, such as increasing active (structured) surveillance. This project contributes towards an understanding of the value of passive surveillance provided by members of the community using a case study: the red imported fire ant (RIFA) eradication program in Brisbane. The RIFA program, managed by Biosecurity Queensland Control Centre (BQCC), is well documented. BQCC has an intense public awareness program with multiple activities, including broad and targeted coverage of distinct community groups and zones within the Brisbane area. We have combined data on community engagement events, reports from the public and nest detections recorded by BQCC, with census data to estimate relationships between demographic characteristics of an area and the likelihood that residents from that area will report encounters with RIFA. In this report we present background information and hypotheses regarding the role of community surveillance in the management of biological invasions. This is followed by details of the datasets used and results of a number of analyses. We show the importance of the data clean-up process and identify the limitations that arise when a database designed primarily to track public reports is used for spatio-temporal analyses where accurate dating of events is important. We also estimate the return on investment in community engagement in terms of the savings in structured-search costs it brings. This estimate uses probability maps to calculate the amount of active search that would have been required to detect all the known ant colonies in the period 2006-2010 if passive surveillance would not have been available. Assuming active search costs $400/ha we obtain a value of $52 million return per $1 million invested in community engagement.",2012,English,Official report,Hester2017,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red imported fire ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"intensive use/developed areas, grazing and timber harvesting areas",4b\12,N,Oceania,Australia,Queensland,Brisbane,Site,2006-2010,Period,2007,2010,2007,2010,Potentially ongoing,861000,,,951772.4287,596853.3471,215250,237943.1072,149213.3368,AUD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"annual budget for community engagement activities, calculated from four years of control efforts; the focus of the paper is on calculating the benefit of community engagement, which they find every $1 spent in community engagement saves $60 in active surveillance",Jennifer Bufford,
SC1062,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,network of trunk roads and motorways,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,876286,,,1522061.459,1402603.078,876286,1522061.459,1402603.078,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Administration/Control/Prevention,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"pp132: Cost includes ""direct control using specialist contractors, vegetation management (e.g. removal of harbouring shrubs), litigation charges and vegetation protection (i.e. cost of installing and removing plastic shelter for trees, etc.) (D. Griffiths, pers. comm.)"". Cost for highways only, not minor roads. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1063,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Brassicales,Brassicaceae,Lepidium,Lepidium draba,,White top (hoary cress),Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,882000,,,941642.8607,941642.8607,882000,941642.8607,941642.8607,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC1067,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Serbia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,900000,,,1365151.063,27000.12073,900000,1365151.063,27000.12073,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1068,,7477,Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing: A case study from South Africa,"McConnachie, M. M., Cowling, R. M. van Wilgen, B. W.  McConnachie, D. A.","Conservation projects spend billions of dollars clearing invasive alien plants, yet few studies have measured the cost-effectiveness of doing this, especially over larger spatial and temporal scales, relevant to operational contexts. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of South Africa’s national invasive alien plant control programme, Working for Water, in reducing invasive alien plant cover in the Krom and Kouga river catchments over 7 years. We assessed change in invasive alien plant cover by comparing post-treatment cover with the first recorded pre-treatment cover across all 740 of the two project’s treatment sites (ranging from 0.03 to 227.6 ha in size). We also used regression analysis to estimate the effect of predictor variables on the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing. We found – by dividing the total costs by the change in invasive alien plant cover – that it cost 2.4 times more (1.5 times for the Krom, and 8.6 times for the Kouga project) to clear invaded land than the highest equivalent estimate made elsewhere. At current rates of clearing, it would take 54 and 695 years to clear the catchments, in the Krom and Kouga, respectively, assuming no further spread. If spread is considered, current control efforts are inadequate, and invasions are likely to continue to spread in the catchments. Pre-treatment invasive alien plant cover and treatment costs per hectare had the greatest positive and negative influence, respectively on cost-effectiveness. Our assessment suggests that invasive alien plant control projects urgently need to monitor their cost-effectiveness so that management practices can be adapted to use scarce conservation funds more effectively.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Krom River Catchment,Unit (1556 km2),6 years (2002-2008),Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,900000,,,138187.8628,221146.0358,128571.4286,19741.12325,31592.29082,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Implementing agent levy costs,Desika Moodley,
SC1071,GS,,"Economic appraisal of the public control and prevention strategy against the 2010 West Nile Virus outbreak in Central Macedonia, Greece","A. Kolimenakis, K. Bithas, C. Richardson, D. Latinopoulos, A. Baka, A. Vakali, C. Hadjichristodoulou, S. Mourelatos, S. Kalaitzopoulou, S. Gewehr, A. Michaelakis, G. Koliopoulous","Objectives
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of the public control and prevention strategies to tackle the 2010 West Nile Virus (WNV) outbreak in the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Efficiency is examined on the basis of the public prevention costs incurred and their potential in justifying the costs arising from health and nuisance impacts in the succeeding years.

Study design
Economic appraisal of public health management interventions.

Methods
Prevention and control cost categories including control programmes, contingency planning and blood safety testing, are analyzed based on market prices. A separate cost of illness approach is conducted for the estimation of medical costs and productivity losses from 2010 to 2013 and for the calculation of averted health impacts. The averted mosquito nuisance costs to households are estimated on the basis of a contingent valuation study. Based on these findings, a limited cost-benefit analysis is employed in order to evaluate the economic efficiency of these strategies in 2010–2013.

Results
Results indicate that cost of illness and prevention costs fell significantly in the years following the 2010 outbreak, also as a result of the epidemic coming under control. According to the contingent valuation survey, the annual average willingness to pay to eliminate the mosquito problem in the study area ranged between 22 and 27 € per household. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that the aggregate benefit of implementing the previous 3-year strategy creates a net socio-economic benefit in 2013. However the spread of the WNV epidemic and the overall socio-economic consequences, had the various costs not been employed, remain unpredictable and extremely difficult to calculate.

Conclusions
The application of a post epidemic strategy appears to be of utmost importance for public health safety. An updated well designed survey is needed for a more precise definition of the optimum prevention policies and levels and for the establishment of the various cost/benefit parameters.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Greece,Macedonia,Region Of Central Macedonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,916429,,,1365716.336,1426763.99,916429,1365716.336,1426763.99,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health/Public and social welfare,Medical care,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC1072,,Greer1990,An Economic Evaluation of the Benefits of Research Into Biological Control of Clematis Vitalba,"Greer, Glen and R.L. Sheppard.","Clematisvitalba,orOldMan'sBeardisaweedwhichisinvadingNewZealand'snativebush.Introducedasagardenspecies,ithasnowspreadintonativebushinmanyareasoftheco~ntryandisregardedasaveryseriousthreattonative'forests.Theplant,adeciduousvine,climbsexistingvegetation,smotheringandeventuallykillingthetreesbelowit.Presentcontrolmeasuresincludechemicalapplicationandhand~cuttingorpulling,buttheweedisstillspreadinginmanyareas.ConsequentlyscientistsareconsideringimplementationofaresearchprogramwiththeaimofidentifyingandintroducingbiologicalagentswhichwouldcontrolClematisvitalba.Aneconomicevaluation,undertakentodeterminewhethersuchresearchisjustified,isthesubjectofthisreport.Thestudycomprisedtwoparts.ThefirstinvolvedtheestimationofthebenefitsofsuchresearchtoNewZealandsociety.Thereisnomarketvalueforscenicresourcessuchasnativebush.Consequentlyanon-marketvaluationtechniqueknownascontingentvaluatiopwasusedtoelicitthecommunity~swillingnesstopayfortheresearch,asaproxyforthebenefitstheyexpecttoreceivefromit.Apostalsurveyof3,000randomlyselectedadultNewZealanderswas.conductedandvalidresponseswerereceivedfrom46percentofthem.Thesecondpartofthestudyconsistedofcollectionandcompilationofdataonexistingcontrolexpen.diturefromlocalauthoritiesandDepartmentofConservationofficers.Threemajorconclusionsemergedfromthestudy.ThefirstwasthatNewZealandersarepreparedtopaysignificantamountsofmoneyforachanceofcontrollingClematisvitalba.Upperandlowerboundestimatesof$111millionand$44millionwereestimated.ThesecondconclusionwasthattheproblemofdamagetonativebushbyClematisvitalbashouldbedealtwithfroman<,tionalperspective.AlthoughtheweedisnotfoundinallregionsofthecountrythestudyfoundthatindividualsfromalloverNewZealandwerepreparedtopaysimilaramountsforresearchintobiologicalcontrol.FinallythestudyconcludesthattheresourcescurrentlydevotedtothecontrolofClematisvitalbaareconsiderablylessthanthevaluetoNewZealandersofpreventingitsfurtherdestructionofnativebush,andthatfundingofresearchintobiologicalcontrolisfullyjustified.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Ranunculaceae,Clematis,Clematis vitalba,,old man's beard,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,1,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1990,Period,1985,1990,1985,1990,One-time,923253,,,1732054.779,1887521.434,153875.5,288675.7965,314586.9057,USD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Expenditure,Phillip Haubrock,
SC1074,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Ebro and Cantabric River Basin,11,NA,Europe,Spain,Diverse/Unspecified,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2003-2006,Period,2003,2006,2003,2006,One-time,928927.7467,,,1418202.575,1533065.608,232231.9367,354550.6438,383266.4019,EUR,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"American mink eradication. Founds: MITECO. They work at the national level, in various Autonomous Communities, in the distribution area of the European mink:  Ebro Basin from Burgos to Zaragoza. Cantabric River Basins in the Basque Country.",Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC1078,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,964995,,,1676144.201,1544592.698,964995,1676144.201,1544592.698,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp117. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1080,,DeRos2015,"The economic impact of invasive pest Drosophila suzukii on berry production in the Province of Trento, Italy","De Ros, G., Conci, S., Pantezzi, T., Gianluca, S.","BACKGROUND:
The fly Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) is an endemic pest, native to Southern Asia which has recently invaded western countries. Since its detection in 2008 in California and Spain, it is now established in North America and in many European countries.

OBJECTIVE:
This paper aims to evaluate the pest’s economic impact on the soft fruit industry in the Province of Trento, a region in the North East of Italy, which is one of the most productive soft fruit areas in Europe.

METHODS:
The evaluation takes into account both the growers’ potential revenue losses and the costs of pest control and uses a partial budgeting approach. Two scenarios are evaluated: the one before and the one after the implementation of an integrated control strategy for D. suzukii.

RESULTS:
Before the adoption of an integrated pest control strategy, the estimated revenue losses amounted to about 13% of the industry’s output. After the implementation of an integrated strategy this loss decreased to about 7% of the industry’s output.

CONCLUSIONS:
The adopted strategy seems effective in mitigating the pest’s economic impact. The knowledge about D. suzukii’s impact and its management would benefit from further analysis encompassing a larger geographical scope and longer time series.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Drosophilidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Europe,Italy,,Trento,Site,2012-2013,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,One-time,985668,,,1377429.635,1406659.883,985668,1377429.635,1406659.883,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Cumulative mass trapping, sanitation, insecticide and application costs.",Ross Cuthbert,No
SC1081,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1986,Year,1986,1986,1986,1986,One-time,995474,NA,NA,1600605.162,1505465.813,995474,1600605.162,1505465.813,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"*Chemical cost missing for this row (1986) - used cost for 1985 as a conservative estimate.* Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1082,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Belarus,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1516834.514,5767800.546,1000000,1516834.514,5767800.546,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1083,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Montenegro,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1516834.514,2995354.321,1000000,1516834.514,2995354.321,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1084,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Portugal,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1516834.514,1748908.247,1000000,1516834.514,1748908.247,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1085,,Thompson1990b,Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge on North Dakota Grazing Land,Thompson,,1990,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Diverse/Unspecified,NA,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,1987-1987,Year,1985,1987,1985,1987,One-time,1000000,,,1876034.824,1876034.824,1000000,1876034.824,1876034.824,USD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""During the period 1985-87, North Dakota real property owners were assessed a total of about $770,000 per year for leafy spurge control, while the state legislature appropriated about another $181,000 per year. When the landowners’ cost share of 20 percent is also considered, the total cost of leafy spurge control appears to have exceeded $1 million per year during this period.""",Marina Golivets,
SC1087,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,Water fern,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1593610.827,1590117.026,90909.09091,144873.7116,144556.0932,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
SC1089,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,Uganda,,Owen Falls Dam,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,1000000,,,1215921.21,4340432.766,1000000,1215921.21,4340432.766,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost for harvesting water hyacinth (mechanical control),Desika Moodley,
SC1090,GS,Burnett2007a,Economic lessons from control efforts for an invasive species: Miconia calvescens in Hawaii,Burnett  K  Kaiser  B  Roumasset  J,"Once established, invasive species can rapidly and irreversibly alter ecosystems and degrade the value of ecosystem services. Optimal control of an unwanted species solves for a trajectory of removals that minimizes the present value of removal costs and residual damages from the remaining population. The shrubby tree, Miconia calvescens, is used to illustrate dynamic policy options for a forest invader. Potential damages to Hawaii's forest ecosystems are related to decreased aquifer recharge, biodiversity, and other ecosystem values. We find that population reduction is the optimal management policy for the islands of Oahu, Maui, and Hawaii. On the island of Kauai, where tree density is lower and search costs higher, optimal policy calls for deferring removal expenditures until the steady state population is reached.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Kaiser, B. A., Burnett, K. M., & Roumasset, J. A. (2006). Control of invasive species: lessons from miconia in Hawaii (No. 379-2016-21585).",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,miconia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,1,NA,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Maui,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1182197.002,1182197.002,1000000,1182197.002,1182197.002,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Maui expends approximately $1 million per year on Miconia
related activities (control)",Melina Kouranditou,
SC1093,,Ciruna2004,The ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive alien species on inland water ecosystems,"Ciruna, K. A., Meyerson, L. A., & Gutierrez, A.","Invasive  alien  species  (IAS)  and  their  effects  on  the  environment,  economy,  and  human  health  have   captured   the   attention   of   scientists,   natural   resource   managers,   and   policy   makers   worldwide.  Article  8(h)  of  the  Convention  on  Biological  Diversity  (CBD)  calls  on  member  governments  to  “as  far  as  is  appropriate:  Prevent  the  introduction  of,  control  or  eradicate  those  alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats, or species,” and calls for particular attention to be directed to geographically and evolutionarily isolated ecosystems, including islands. On behalf of  the  CBD  and  United  States  Agency  for  International  Development  (USAID),  the  GlobalInvasive Species Programme (GISP) convened a workshop in October 2002 to review the socio-economic and biological impacts of IAS on island systems.  Experts from 10 countries, as well as GISP,  the  World  Conservation  Union  (IUCN),  and  the  World  Conservation  Monitoring  Centre  (WCMC) participated.   Participants in the Experts Consultation reached the following major conclusions: For biological and  socio-economic  reasons,  islands  are  particularly  vulnerable  to  bioinvasions.    IAS  can  influence island environments at all levels of biological organization and also impact agriculture, fisheries,  tourism,  energy,  water,  and  human  health.    Lack  of  access  to  extant  technologies,  particularly in small island developing States (SIDS) has resulted in IAS impacts that might have otherwise been avoided.  While foreign aid can support IAS prevention and control efforts, it canalso facilitate IAS introductions.  Political pressure may exist to introduce IAS that will provide short-term  economic  benefits  regardless  of  the  longer-term  biological  costs.  Although  ballast  water  is  a  well-recognized  pathway  for  marine  bioinvasions,  ship  hull  fouling  by  marineorganisms is an often overlooked but significant pathway.   The  following  actions  were  recommended  by  the  workshop  participants:  Develop  informaticscapacities  to  increase  knowledge  of  and  access  to  successful  and  cost-effective  IAS  prevention  and  management  tools.    Establish  comprehensive  IAS  surveillance  programs  to  enable  earlydetection  and  rapid  response.    Undertake  further  assessments  of  IAS  pathways  and  impacts,  making  the  results  widely  available  to  resource  managers  and  policy  makers.    Implement  legal  frameworks  to  minimize  the  risk  of  bioinvasion  and  develop  alternatives  to  toxic  anti-fouling  agents. ",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Maconellicoccus,Maconellicoccus hirsutus,,Hibiscus mealy bug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,11,N,Central America,Grenada,,Grenada,Country,2004,Year,2004,Unspecified,2004,2004,One-time,1000000,,,1297730.08,2023190.542,1000000,1297730.08,2023190.542,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,control costs,Phillip Haubrock,
SC1095,,Kriwoken2000,"Exotic species and estuaries: managing Spartina anglica in Tasmania, Australia","Kriwoken, L.K., Hedge, P.","The spread of exotic Spartina anglica (rice grass) occurs in temperate estuaries of the USA,
UK, Netherlands, France, China, New Zealand and Australia. In Australia S. anglica infestations are found in the southern States of Tasmania and Victoria. The ecological, social and
economic costs associated with its continued spread in Tasmania have resulted in the development of a management program supporting eradication and control. The paper begins by
outlining the suite of problems associated with the management of exotic S. anglica infestations.
The legislative framework for S. anglica is then critically evaluated. Recent developments that
facilitate integrated coastal zone management are presented and assessed with respect to S.
anglica. The paper makes recommendations on resolving legislative and institutional responsibility, promoting sustainable development practices in the coastal zone and raising the pro""le
of environmental and aquatic weeds such as S. anglica.",2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus anglicus,,Common cordgrass,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,8,N,Oceania,Australia,,Tasmania,Site,1998,Period,1998,2001,1998,2001,One-time,1000000,,,954965.5664,769731.6207,250000,238741.3916,192432.9052,AUD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"In 1998 the DPIWE received
a Commonwealth of Australia Natural Heritage Trust grant of AUD$660,000 (plus in kind contributions of $440,000) to fund a state-wide Spartina management program",Ross Cuthbert,
SC1097,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1736945.996,1600622.488,1000000,1736945.996,1600622.488,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Fishery,Control/Damage-Loss/Prevention,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Angling cost for GB from Table 4.7, pp45. Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1099,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Balsaminaceae,Impatiens,Impatiens glandulifera,,Himalayan balsam,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Unspecified,Country,Annual,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1736945.996,1600622.488,1000000,1736945.996,1600622.488,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp158: ""An estimated £1 million per year is spent on control, mainly carried out by Wildlife Trusts and volunteers (Rob Tanner, pers. comm.).""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1103,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,1033100,,,1752983.27,1752983.27,1033100,1752983.27,1752983.27,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct costs from leafy spurge infestations on grazing land,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1105,TC,SP_61,Respuesta a la solicitud de información de elena angulo para el proyecto sobre los costes de las invasiones biológicas INVACOST,"Miren Karmele Ferrer Javares, TragsaTec",NA,2020,Spanish,Unpublished material,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,"Ebro, Segura and Cantabric River Basin",11,NA,Europe,Spain,Wyoming,Ebro Basin From Burgos To Zaragoza/cantabric Basin Rivers/valencia Basin Rivers,Unit (River Basin),2014-2019,Period,2014,2019,2014,2019,One-time,1041205.45,,,1178933.246,1540915.776,173534.2417,196488.8744,256819.2961,EUR,2019,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,European mink conservation. Activities with american mink within recovery plan of european mink,Elena Angulo/Ana Novoa/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros,Yes
SC1108,TC,,The red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii in Europe: impacts on aquatic ecosystems and human well-being.,"Souty-Grosset, C., Anastacio, P. M., Aquiloni, L., Banha, F., Choquer, J., Chucholl, C., & Tricarico, E.","Procambarus clarkii is currently recorded from 16 European territories. On top of being a vector of crayfish plague, which is responsible for large-scale disappearance of native crayfish species, it causes severe impacts on diverse aquatic ecosystems, due to its rapid life cycle, dispersal capacities, burrowing activities and high population densities. The species has even been recently discovered in caves. This invasive crayfish is a polytrophic keystone species that can exert multiple pressures on ecosystems. Most studies deal with the decline of macrophytes and predation on several species (amphibians, molluscs, and macroinvertebrates), highlighting how this biodiversity loss leads to unbalanced food chains. At a management level, the species is considered as (a) a devastating digger of the water drainage systems in southern and central Europe, (b) an agricultural pest in Mediterranean territories, consuming, for example, young rice plants, and (c) a threat to the restoration of water bodies in north-western Europe. Indeed, among the high-risk species, P. clarkii consistently attained the highest risk rating. Its negative impacts on ecosystem services were evaluated. These may include the loss of provisioning services such as reductions in valued edible native species of regulatory and supporting services, inducing wide changes in ecological communities and increased costs to agriculture and water management. Finally, cultural services may be lost. The species fulfils the criteria of the Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament (species widely spread in Europe and impossible to eradicate in a cost-effective manner) and has been included in the “Union List”. Particularly, awareness of the ornamental trade through the internet must be reinforced within the European Community and import and trade regulations should be imposed to reduce the availability of this high-risk species.

",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Cambaridae,Procambarus,Procambarus clarkii,,Red Swamp Crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Rice fields,12b,N,Europe,Portugal,South Dakota,Portugal,Country,2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,Potentially ongoing,1075000,,,1215267.469,1887069.088,1075000,1215267.469,1887069.088,EUR,2016,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Cesar Capinha/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC1113,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Switzerland,Wyoming,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1100000,,,1668517.966,,1100000,1668517.966,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1116,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,houses/gardens,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,Montana,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1116000,,,1938431.732,1786294.697,1116000,1938431.732,1786294.697,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"House devaluation cost for GB from Table 4.3, pp41 (repeated in Chapter 10). Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1117,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Oceania,Australia,South Dakota,Australia,Unit (17 542 km²),2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,1121000,,,1363047.677,1289906.606,1121000,1363047.677,1289906.606,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of aerial spraying (chemical control),Desika Moodley,
SC1119,,Buddenhagen2005,"The cost of quinine Cinchona pubescens control on Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos","Buddenhagen, C. and Yánez, P.","We analyse the cost of controlling the invasive quinine tree Cinchona pubescens Vahl in the highlands of Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos. Control costs in ten 400 m2 plots formed the basis for estimating the cost of control over the whole island. In the plots, densities were 2100–24,000 stems/ha (stems >150 cm tall) and 55,000–138,000 stems/ha (all size classes combined). Control involved uprooting small plants, and applying of a mix of metsulfuron methyl and picloram to cut stumps or to machete cuts in the bark of larger trees. These methods are presently used by Galapagos National Park field crews to control quinine. Costs (in man hours, herbicide and US$) were related to stem density; the density of stems summed across four height classes was a better predictor of costs than density of any one size class. Regressions (on all size classes combined) formed the basis for predictive models of costs. Costs ranged from $14 to $2225 per ha depending on stem density. The amount of herbicide (active ingredient/ha) that must be applied to high density stands of quinine is higher than typical rates of application in an agricultural setting. The cost of treating all existing plants once across quinine’s known range on Santa Cruz Island (c. 11,000 ha) was estimated at c. US$1.65 million.",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Rubiaceae,Cinchona,Cinchona pubescens,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Miconia and Fern-Sedge Zones,3,Y,South America,Ecuador,South Dakota,"Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos",Site,2004,Year,2004,2004,2004,2004,One-time,1137170,,,1475739.715,3912957.865,1137170,1475739.715,3912957.865,USD,2004,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimative of control in plots of 20 x 20 m with high, medium and low density quinine on Santa Cruz, using cutting, herbicide, and uprooted",Gustavo Heringer,
SC1124,,7477,Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing: A case study from South Africa,"McConnachie, M. M., Cowling, R. M. van Wilgen, B. W.  McConnachie, D. A.","Conservation projects spend billions of dollars clearing invasive alien plants, yet few studies have measured the cost-effectiveness of doing this, especially over larger spatial and temporal scales, relevant to operational contexts. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of South Africa’s national invasive alien plant control programme, Working for Water, in reducing invasive alien plant cover in the Krom and Kouga river catchments over 7 years. We assessed change in invasive alien plant cover by comparing post-treatment cover with the first recorded pre-treatment cover across all 740 of the two project’s treatment sites (ranging from 0.03 to 227.6 ha in size). We also used regression analysis to estimate the effect of predictor variables on the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing. We found – by dividing the total costs by the change in invasive alien plant cover – that it cost 2.4 times more (1.5 times for the Krom, and 8.6 times for the Kouga project) to clear invaded land than the highest equivalent estimate made elsewhere. At current rates of clearing, it would take 54 and 695 years to clear the catchments, in the Krom and Kouga, respectively, assuming no further spread. If spread is considered, current control efforts are inadequate, and invasions are likely to continue to spread in the catchments. Pre-treatment invasive alien plant cover and treatment costs per hectare had the greatest positive and negative influence, respectively on cost-effectiveness. Our assessment suggests that invasive alien plant control projects urgently need to monitor their cost-effectiveness so that management practices can be adapted to use scarce conservation funds more effectively.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Kouga River Catchment,Unit (2426 km2),6 years (2002-2008),Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,1180000,,,181179.6423,289947.0247,168571.4286,25882.80604,41421.00352,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Management costs,Desika Moodley,
SC1125,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Slovenia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1200000,,,1820201.417,2095706.519,1200000,1820201.417,2095706.519,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1129,,7477,Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing: A case study from South Africa,"McConnachie, M. M., Cowling, R. M. van Wilgen, B. W.  McConnachie, D. A.","Conservation projects spend billions of dollars clearing invasive alien plants, yet few studies have measured the cost-effectiveness of doing this, especially over larger spatial and temporal scales, relevant to operational contexts. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of South Africa’s national invasive alien plant control programme, Working for Water, in reducing invasive alien plant cover in the Krom and Kouga river catchments over 7 years. We assessed change in invasive alien plant cover by comparing post-treatment cover with the first recorded pre-treatment cover across all 740 of the two project’s treatment sites (ranging from 0.03 to 227.6 ha in size). We also used regression analysis to estimate the effect of predictor variables on the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing. We found – by dividing the total costs by the change in invasive alien plant cover – that it cost 2.4 times more (1.5 times for the Krom, and 8.6 times for the Kouga project) to clear invaded land than the highest equivalent estimate made elsewhere. At current rates of clearing, it would take 54 and 695 years to clear the catchments, in the Krom and Kouga, respectively, assuming no further spread. If spread is considered, current control efforts are inadequate, and invasions are likely to continue to spread in the catchments. Pre-treatment invasive alien plant cover and treatment costs per hectare had the greatest positive and negative influence, respectively on cost-effectiveness. Our assessment suggests that invasive alien plant control projects urgently need to monitor their cost-effectiveness so that management practices can be adapted to use scarce conservation funds more effectively.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Krom River Catchment,Unit (1556 km2),6 years (2002-2008),Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,1240000,,,190392.1665,304690.0937,177142.8571,27198.88093,43527.15625,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Management costs,Desika Moodley,
SC1139,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Robust reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,1300000,,,90260.13267,225760.9222,65000,4513.006633,11288.04611,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1141,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Astacidae,Pacifastacus,Pacifastacus leniusculus,,signal crayfish,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1302000,,,2261503.687,2084010.48,1302000,2261503.687,2084010.48,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage repair,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Management cost for GB from Table 4.7, pp45. Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost. White-clawed crayfish conservation costs classified as Damage repair.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1142,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea solstitialis,,Yellow starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1320000,,,1409261.424,1409261.424,1320000,1409261.424,1409261.424,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC1144,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,6 years,Period,2010,Unspecified,2010,2015,One-time,1350000,,,2344877.095,2160840.359,225000,390812.8491,360140.0599,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Ruddy duck control research. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1146,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa destructor,,varroa mite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1370642,,,2380731.134,2193880.409,1370642,2380731.134,2193880.409,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Mitigation/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,pp66: research and delivery of bee health issues associated with invasive species (description of this cost in report is not very clear). Report also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1153,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chondrilla,Chondrilla juncea,,Rush skeletonweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,1397000,,,1491468.341,1491468.341,1397000,1491468.341,1491468.341,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC1156,,Edwards2009,"Re-evaluating eradication of nuisance species: invasion of the tunicate, Ciona intestinalis.","Edwards PK, Leung B","Eradication is an important concept in the management of biological invasions, but it is rarely considered
in practice. This may be because managers commonly work with incomplete data and little or no practical
guidance. Past eradication frameworks provide some useful criteria, but do not provide quantitative guidelines.
Here, we argue that eradication is not always adequately considered, and we develop a framework for
rapid assessment of its feasibility, despite limited data. This quantitative model offers criteria to rapidly
assess the potential for eradication and provide estimates of the necessary effort and timing, and of the size
of the target area. This framework is applied to a recent tunicate (Ciona intestinalis) invasion around Prince
Edward Island, Canada, which is causing considerable economic damage to harvesters of blue mussels
(Mytilus edulis). Our framework suggests that eradication may be feasible and, based on a cost–benefit
analysis, could require only a > 16% chance of success to constitute a worthwhile risk.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,Locke2009 pp257 https://www.reabic.net/aquaticinvasions/2009/AI_2009_4_1_Locke_etal2.pdf,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Ascidiacea,Phlebobranchia,Cionidae,Ciona,Ciona intestinalis,,sea vase,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,bays,11,NA,North America,Canada,Prince Edward Island,Prince Edward Island,Unit (Province),Year,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1400000,NA,NA,1401246.226,1331523.237,1400000,1401246.226,1331523.237,CAD,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage repair,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"In supplementary material/Web Panel 1: ""A case study that incorporates additional fuel, disposal, labor, and processing fees to eradicate tunicates estimates a current $0.242 additional cost per kilogram of mussels (McDonald 2003). Based on production weight in the infested bays of 5575 metric tons, annual spending to control Ciona in the infested bays totals approximately $1.4 million.""",Nigel Taylor,
SC1157,TC,Flacio2015,Strategies of a thirteen year surveillance programme on Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) in southern Switzerland,Flacio et al.,"Background
In Ticino, a canton located south of the Alps in Switzerland, a surveillance programme on Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) started in 2000 seeing that the region was considered at high risk of introduction based on the rapid spread of this mosquito in neighbouring Italy.

Methods
The surveillance programme, which is still ongoing, was adapted continuously to handle preventive measures of arrival, dispersal and establishment of this invasive species. The monitoring was based on ovitraps supported by reports from the population. The integrated control measures included removal of breeding sites, larvicide applications with Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis or diflubenzuron and, in some circumstances, adulticide applications with permethrin. These measures involved citizens, municipalities and Civil Protection Units.

Results
Ae. albopictus was first observed in 2003 in Ticino. We describe the strategies adopted and their adaptations to the evolving problem since year 2000. The approach used allowed keeping the mosquito densities at tolerable levels and below the threshold of autochthonous Ae. albopictus borne disease transmission. During the surveillance period, new typologies of breeding sites for Ae. albopictus have been discovered.

Conclusions
It was worth tackling the arrival of Ae. albopictus and adopting immediate control measures, followed by regular control measures after its establishment. Early intervention and prevention of the possible spread of the tiger mosquito over the territory avoided facing a crisis situation. This also reduced the difficulty of managing the situation and probably also reduced the overall cost if this had not been put in place.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11\12,NA,Europe,Switzerland,Ticino,Ticino,Unit (canton),3rd period (2009-up to now),Period,2009,2015,2009,2015,Potentially ongoing,1400000,,,1504455.548,1171923.507,200000,214922.2212,167417.6439,CHF,2015,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"Cost for third period. ""Cost factors may affect strategies applied for the surveillance and the control of the tiger mosquito [35,36]. In our case, the limited budget resources for salaries and materials, which reached at the beginning around 10,000 CHF/year and rose up to 8 folds in the 2nd period to 20 folds in the 3rd one, as well as the increasing amount of work, due to the spread of the tiger mosquito, prompted us to constantly rationalize the system and to outsource part of the work to the concerned municipalities during the 3rd period."" Additional info on Type_of_cost throughout paper. Not entirely clear if 20-fold increase for 3rd period is from 1st period or 2nd period: assumed from 1st period to give a conservative estimate.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1162,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Bulgaria,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1500000,,,2275251.771,2331528.542,1500000,2275251.771,2331528.542,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1163,,Buddenhagen2006,Classical biological control for the management of alien invasive plants in Ireland,"Baars, J-R.","As a consequence of the sustained interest in exotic plants we now face the challenge of dealing with the economic and ecological impacts of many environmental weeds. Exotic ornamental plants can often flourish as they have been imported without their natural enemies that suppress the plant's growth and reproduction in the native range. The aim of classical biological control is to re-establish the natural regulation provided by host-specific primary consumers from the native range of the weed. In contrast to the long history of arthropod biological control in Europe, environmental weed biological control is only now gaining some momentum. Ireland stands to benefit from developments made in other EU member states and other parts of the world as it shares many of the same environmental weed problems. Both terrestrial and aquatic weeds are good targets for biological control, and developments relevant to Ireland are described in this paper to illustrate the potential benefits of this management option.",2011,English,Official report,"Djeddour, D. H., & Shaw, R. H. (2010). The biological control of fallopia japonica in great britain: Review and current status. Outlooks on Pest Management, 21(1), 15–18; Defra (2003). Review of non-native species policy – Report of the working group. PB8072: 1–90.",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese Knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,England,United Kingdom,Country,2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,1500000,,>1500000,3263346.647,2869030.473,1500000,3263346.647,2869030.473,GBP,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Angela Bartlett,No
SC1164,,Coombs1996,"Economic and Regional Benefits from the Biological Control of Tansy Ragwort, Senecio Jacobaea, (Asteraceae) in Oregon","Coombs, E.M., H. Radtke, D.L. Isaacson, and S.P. Snyder.","Successful biological control of tansy ragwort in Oregon provides an estimated annual benefit of more than US$5 million, with a minimum benefit-to-cost ratio of 13:1. Losses of livestock have been reduced by $3.7 million/year. Additional savings have accrued through increased productivity of pastures ($1.27 million/year) and by reducing herbicide use ($0.85 million/year). Control of ragwort was achieved at a cost of about $5/ha. Non-market benefits include return of desirable flora in habitats once dominated by ragwort and a reduction in herbicide in the environment. Several correlative observations substantiate evidence used in estimating benefits of the regional control of ragwort. In western Oregon, control of ragwort reduced propagule production, which correlated with a decline in the number of new infestations in eastern Oregon, despite increased detection efforts. The number of releases of the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae, the ragwort flea beetle, Longitarsus jacobaeae, and the number of cattle deaths attributed to pyrrolizidine poisoning both decreased by more than 90% in relation to declining ragwort densities.",1996,English,Conference proceedings,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio jacobaea,,ragwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,Western Oregeon,Site,18 years,Period,1974,1992,1974,1992,One-time,1500000,,,7456739.057,7456739.057,78947.36842,392459.9504,392459.9504,USD,1974,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Amount of money spent on a biologicval control programme,,
SC1165,,Denne1998,Economics of nassella tussock (Nassella trichotoma) control in New Zealand,"Denne, T.","his paper questions whether current control of the pasture weed nassella tussock (NasseUa trichotoma (Nees) Hack. ex Arech) is worthwhile, and how management can be improved. A computer model is developed to simulate nassella tussock population growth, and to provide a basis for calculating economic effects. The existing policy objective of eradication is shown to be inappropriate for economic and practical reasons. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that current government control programmes yield positive net benefits at a 10% discount rate, under realistic population growth-rate assumptions. An economic threshold model confirms that control should be undertaken at current levels of infestation. An optimization model suggests that greater net benefits would be obtained with less frequent control operations than currently practiced. ",1998,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Nassella,Nassella trichotoma,,pasture weed nassella tussock,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,pastureland,12b,NA,Oceania,New Zealand,,,Country,1 year,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,1500000,,,2036896.305,2025312.639,1500000,2036896.305,2025312.639,NZD,1988,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,total cost of contro,,
SC1166,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Codiaceae,Codium,Codium fragile,,osyter thief,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Prince Edward Island,Site,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,1500000,,,1301679.259,1662757.525,1500000,1301679.259,1662757.525,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The data originate from a pers. Com whih cannot be checked.,Andrew Kramer,
SC1167,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,1500000,,,104146.3069,260493.3718,75000,5207.315346,13024.66859,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1177,,Chan2010,"Hawaiian Residents' Preferences for Miconia Control Program Attributes Using Conjoint Choice Experiment and Latent Class Analysis Miconia,  Hawaii,  Conjoint choice experiment,  Valuation,  Latent class analysis,  Control program MODELS,  LOGIT Invasive s",Chan Halbrendt  C  Lin  T  Yang  F  Sisior  G,"Invasive species control or eradication is an important issue. On the islands of Hawaii, this problem is exceedingly evident when it comes to Miconia calvescens (Miconia).Adequate fundingis neededtocontroloreradicate this invasive plant, but with the limited amount of funding available for the ?ght againstMiconia,itis importanttomake sure that the fund is being spent in a way that addresses the needs or preferences of the Hawaiian residents. Using the conjointchoiceexperimentmethod,wedesignedasurveythat wouldmeasuretheHawaiianresidents’willingnesstosupport Miconiacontrol program attributes. Theattributesfocused on were cost, biodiversity loss, extent of spread and soil erosion. Latent class approach was used to assess the surveyed population to see the different preferences by individual classes. The results show three different classes or groups of individuals with varying preferences for a control program of which cost and erosion were the top preferred attributes among the classes. These groups were de?ned by their socio-demographics of income, the length of residency and exposure to farming/gardeningactivities.Evenwithapreferenceforlower cost, a group showed willingness to pay more ($2.40) for a program that reduces erosion from high to low. Finally, the biodiversity attribute had very low consideration from a
majority of the respondents showing the need for educating the public regarding its importance in preserving the unique environment in Hawaii.
",2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Kaiser B (2006) Economic impacts of non-indigenous species: Miconia and the Hawaiian economy. Euphytica 148:135–150,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Melastomataceae,Miconia,Miconia calvescens,,Miconia,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Hawaii,Unspecified,Site,1 year,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,1700000,,,2419879.743,2419879.743,1700000,2419879.743,2419879.743,USD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,A described cost of control which is linkedback to the Kaiser paper,,
SC1185,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1987,Year,1987,1987,1987,1987,One-time,1782252,NA,NA,2865651.691,2695318.467,1782252,2865651.691,2695318.467,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1186,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,1790000,,,3358102.334,3358102.334,1790000,3358102.334,3358102.334,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""… estimated using the North Dakota Input-Output Model (Coon et al. 1985)""",Marina Golivets,
SC1187,,Cusack2009,The Economics of Invasive Species,"Cusack, Chris, Michael Harte, and Samuel Chan","The prevention, eradication, and control of invasive species is an economic and policy issue and has less to do with biology and ecology than many people involved in managing natural resources realize. Invasive species were introduced into the United States as a result of trade, commerce, and the fulfillment of cultural needs. Decisions about agricultural production, conversion of land from forest to fields to towns, the growth of trade and tourism, and the choice of introduced species for food production, garden ornamentals, and for hunting and fishing are among the fundamental economic drivers of the invasive species problem. Economics provides us with many of the tools we need to understand the drivers of the invasive species problem and inform managers and policymakers about the costs of invasive species and the costs and benefits of different prevention, eradication, and control measures. Studies have been carried out to estimate the economic effects of invasive species and their management on natural resources. These have been particularly focused on forest or agricultural production losses and control costs, but the economic impacts on ecosystem functioning and human health have been less well studied at both state and national levels. Examples of estimates of the annual cost of invasive species in the U.S. and Oregon (in 2008 dollars) are shown in the chart below. Although these studies provide policymakers with important information with which to make decisions, inconsistency in study methodologies limits the usability and comparability of these studies in making policy decisions. A much wider role for economics is needed that goes beyond financial analyses of agricultural or timber production losses and control costs and embraces measures of the impact of invasive species on total economic value and the consequences of the loss or impairment of ecosystem services for the economic well-being of Oregon. Early detection and rapid response (EDRR) and prevention are among the most cost-efficient and -effective ways of reducing the costs of invasive species. Education is a primary process driving EDRR and prevention. Enhanced education of the public, government agencies, industry, and nongovernmental organizations is needed to strengthen all links in the invasive species management chain.",2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Oomycota,Peronosporea,Peronosporales,Peronosporaceae,Phytophthora,Phytophthora ramorum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,Southwest Oregon,Site,Year,Year,Unspecified,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1800000,NA,NA,2049280.663,2049280.663,1800000,2049280.663,2049280.663,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"pp10: ""The current management program of early detection and eradication has cost approximately $1.8 million per year."" Spatial scale is unclear, but assume Southwest Oregon because of title of case study.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1193,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,1999-2004,Period,1999,2004,1999,2004,One-time,1876000,,,3258510.689,3002767.788,312666.6667,543085.1148,500461.2981,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Rabbit. Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1195,,FLDEP2007,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,,2007,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Cyperales,Poaceae,Panicum,Panicum repens,,Torpedograss,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,1900610,,,2246895.444,2246895.444,1900610,2246895.444,2246895.444,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1197,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,properties,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,1914555,,,3325478.642,3064479.788,1914555,3325478.642,3064479.788,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp126: ""the annual control cost can be estimated at £1,754,514, £44,067 and £115,974 for England, Scotland and Wales respectively, giving a total of £1,914,555.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1205,TC,NME2007,Strategy on Invasive Alien Species,Norwegian Ministry of the Environment,"[First page of text] CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The introduction of invasive alien species is considered to be one of the most serious threats to global biodiversity. Alien species can also have substantial economic and social impacts.
People have moved plant and animal species to new areas throughout history: often, this has been for our own benefit, to use them as agricultural crops or livestock. In many cases, the consequences of such introductions have been mainly positive or neutral.
More recently, there has been a considerable rise in introductions of alien species, particularly as a result of changes in international patterns of transport and trade. This has resulted in growing awareness of the negative impacts certain species can have when they are introduced outside their natural distribution ranges.
In Norway, too, the introduction and spread of invasive alien species is a serious and growing threat to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and has already inflicted heavy costs on society.
Dealing with alien species involves a complex set of challenges. Most introduced species are not able to survive and spread in the wild. Others become established without harming the ecosystems where they are introduced. But some species both become established and cause significant damage to ecosystems, for example by displacing native species or spreading disease. These are known as invasive alien species, and they can have very serious negative impacts, both on ecosystems and biodiversity and on industries such as agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture that are based on the use of these ecosystems.
Measures to address the problem of invasive alien species in Norway will also be important in efforts to achieve the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010. Under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Norway has undertaken as far as possible and as appropriate to prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.
Many different bodies in a range of administrative sectors are responsible for action to address the problem of alien species and for administration and enforcement of legislation relating to the introduction, spread, and management and control of alien species. Effective action to reduce the threat from alien species therefore requires targeted and coordinated cross-sectoral efforts. The decision to draw up a cross-sectoral national strategy on alien species was taken in the 2005 white paper on the government’s environmental policy and the state of the environment in Norway (Report No. 21 (2004–2005) to the Storting) and the subsequent debate in the Storting.
This document describes Norway’s goals and principles for dealing with alien species and specific measures that will be implemented in all relevant administrative sectors. The strategy is intended to ensure that there is a common understanding and",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Phoxinus,Phoxinus phoxinus,,common minnow,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,NA,Europe,Norway,Unspecified,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,403365.4826,264723.2238,2000000,403365.4826,264723.2238,NOK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Control/Eradication/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"pp11: ""In 2005, NOK 2 million was allocated to measures to prevent the spread of minnows and certain other freshwater organisms. This has been used to map the occurrence of minnows in the Namsen river system. Some of the tributaries of the Namsen were treated with rotenone to prevent minnows from become established in the main river. Funding was also provided for information activities to prevent the spread of minnows and for trap fishing to remove them from certain localities.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1207,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,railways,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,3473891.992,3201244.977,2000000,3473891.992,3201244.977,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Railways cost for GB from Table 4.3, pp41. Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1209,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus echinatus,,Southern sandbur,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,native grassland (atoll),4a,Y,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Laysan Island,Unit (441 ha),23 years,Period,1985,2008,1985,2008,One-time,2041410,,,2324123.355,2324123.355,85058.75,96838.47312,96838.47312,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, citing Flint & Rehkemper 2002 and pers comm; note this is currently a protected area, but might not have been when eradication first started; used gross area (area treated + area searched)",Jennifer Bufford,
SC1210,GS,,"Silver-cheeked toadfish, Lagocephalus scleratus (Actinopterygii: tetraodontiformes: tetraodontidae), causes a substantial economic losses in the Turkish mediterranean coast: A call for decision makers","Ünal, V., GÖNCÜO?LU, H., Durgun, D., TOSUNO?LU, Z., Deval, M. C., & Turan, C.","Background. While some Lessepsian species provide economic benefi ts for Mediterranean fi sheries, others cause
economic losses. Lagocephalus sceleratus known as silver-cheeked toadfi sh poses a great risk to human health if
consumed economic losses for fi shers by damaging their fi shing gears. This study aims to determine the socio-economic
impact of silver-cheeked toadfi sh, with regards to its impact on biodiversity and socio-economic factors
for small-scale fi sheries.
Materials and methods. Face-to-face interviews were completed with a total of 261 fi shers from Izmir in the
Middle Aegean region to Hatay in the Eastern Mediterranean region, to determine the problems arising from the
presence of silver-cheeked toadfi sh species in the ecosystem and the resulting associated economic losses for a
1-year from 1 January to 30 December 2011. The elements, which should be taken into account in calculating
silver-cheeked toadfi sh related economic losses, are related to fi shing gear, labour and the associated losses in
catches. However, losses associated with silver-cheeked toadfi sh predation were beyond the scope of this study.
Results. Almost all fi shers (91%) agree that silver-cheeked toadfi sh is a major problem, 82% believe that silver
-cheeked toadfi sh negatively affects biodiversity, and 89% believe it lowers effi ciency of their catches. Calculated
silver-cheeked toadfi sh related losses were: 1300 TRY**?(?442 EUR) per year, per fi sherman; 263 296 TRY (?89
521 EUR) per year, in total, for the interviewed fi shers (261), and 204 fi shers suffered economic losses relating to
this species; which caused total losses of 6 033 577 TRY (?2 051 416 EUR) per year in total for the 4719 fi shers,
which were 78% of all fi shers (6051) in the study area. Two-thirds of the study respondents think that the most
effective way to battle this problem would be to try to eliminate this species from Turkish waters. Among them,
32% of the fi shers believe the most suitable gear to eliminate L. sceleratus from the marine ecosystem is the purse
seine and 61% consent to fi sh L. sceleratus for 4 TRY each as a target species.
Conclusion. To start a bounty system and a premium payment for each pufferfi sh caught will both help to reduce
negative impact of the species on the ecosystem and provide an extra income for the fi shers.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Tetraodontiformes,Tetraodontidae,Lagocephalus,Lagocephalus sceleratus,,silver-cheeked toadfish,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,NA,Asia,Turkey,,"Mediterranean Coast
Of Turkey",Site,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,2051416,,,3111658.592,,2051416,3111658.592,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou/Elena Angulo/Nigel Taylor/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
SC1214,WoS,DeGrotte2003,Economic impact of biological control of water hyacinth in Southern Benin,De Groote et al.,"A biological control program of water hyacinth was undertaken in Southern Benin between 1991 and 1993. It consisted of the release of three natural enemies, two weevil species and one moth, that feed exclusively on water hyacinth. In 1999, a survey of 365 men and women from 192 households in 24 villages in the target area, using participatory and quantitative methods, revealed that water hyacinth, although not eliminated, was perceived by the villagers as having been reduced from a serious pest to one of minor or moderate importance. According to their estimates of the impacts they perceived, at the peak of the infestation water hyacinth had reduced the yearly income of this population of about 200 000 by approximately US$84 million. Lost revenues for men were mostly in fishing, while women experienced lost revenues in trade, primarily food crops and fish. The reduction of water hyacinth cover through biological control was credited with an increase in income of US$30.5 million per year. The total cost of the control program is estimated at a present value of US$2.09 million. Assuming the benefits are to stay constant over the next 20 years, a most conservative assumption, the accumulated present value would be US$260 million, yielding a respectable benefit cost ratio of 124:1. This ratio is calculated for direct economic effects on the people of Southern Benin only, and does not take into account indirect benefits or the benefits of the project to other countries were the biological control agents were successfully introduced. Other effects mentioned, but not measured, included an increase of water quality and of human health",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Wetlands,10,N,Africa,Benin,,Southern Benin,Site,20 years (since 1999),Period,1999,2019,1999,2019,One-time,2090000,,,3075491.095,9615620.925,99523.80952,146451.9569,457886.7107,USD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of biological control vs. estimated benefits. For a period of 20 years, benefit-cost ratio = 124:1. The 2,090000 USD is the present value of the cost of a biological control program over a 20 year period. 
The yearly income loss due to water hyacinth is 84000000 USD. The benefit from the biological control program is estimated as 260,000000 over  20 year period.",Justice Tambo,
SC1215,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1980,Year,1980,1980,1980,1980,One-time,2091648,NA,NA,3363124.086,3163221.296,2091648,3363124.086,3163221.296,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1217,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,2111600,,,3583002.103,3583002.103,2111600,3583002.103,3583002.103,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Wildlife-recreation costs (i.e direct costs) from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1218,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Branta,Branta canadensis,,Canada goose,Aquatic/Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,Y,golf courses,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,2113600,,,3671209.057,3383075.692,2113600,3671209.057,3383075.692,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp109. Cost of management on golf courses. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC1219,,DeRos2015,"The economic impact of invasive pest Drosophila suzukii on berry production in the Province of Trento, Italy","De Ros, G., Conci, S., Pantezzi, T., Gianluca, S.","BACKGROUND:
The fly Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) is an endemic pest, native to Southern Asia which has recently invaded western countries. Since its detection in 2008 in California and Spain, it is now established in North America and in many European countries.

OBJECTIVE:
This paper aims to evaluate the pest’s economic impact on the soft fruit industry in the Province of Trento, a region in the North East of Italy, which is one of the most productive soft fruit areas in Europe.

METHODS:
The evaluation takes into account both the growers’ potential revenue losses and the costs of pest control and uses a partial budgeting approach. Two scenarios are evaluated: the one before and the one after the implementation of an integrated control strategy for D. suzukii.

RESULTS:
Before the adoption of an integrated pest control strategy, the estimated revenue losses amounted to about 13% of the industry’s output. After the implementation of an integrated strategy this loss decreased to about 7% of the industry’s output.

CONCLUSIONS:
The adopted strategy seems effective in mitigating the pest’s economic impact. The knowledge about D. suzukii’s impact and its management would benefit from further analysis encompassing a larger geographical scope and longer time series.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Drosophilidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Europe,Italy,,Trento,Site,2012-2013,Year,2012,2013,2012,2013,One-time,2115032,,,2955668.394,3018390.235,2115032,2955668.394,3018390.235,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Potential revenue losses after the implementation of an integrated control strategy,Ross Cuthbert,No
SC1222,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chondrilla,Chondrilla juncea,,Rush skeletonweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,2177000,,,2324213.728,2324213.728,2177000,2324213.728,2324213.728,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC1223,,Barz2009,"Cost/Benefit Considerations for Recent Saltcedar Control, Middle Pecos River, New Mexico Environmental Management, 43: 282-298","Barz, Dave, Richard P. Watson, Joseph F. Kanney, Jesse D. Roberts, and David P. Groeneveld","Major bene?ts were weighed against major costs associated with recent saltcedar control efforts along the Middle Pecos River, New Mexico. The area of study was restricted to both sides of the channel and excluded tributaries along the 370 km between Sumner and Brantley dams. Direct costs (helicopter spraying, dead tree removal, and revegetation) within the study area were estimated to be $2.2 million but possibly rising to $6.4 million with the adoption of an aggressive revegetation program. Indirect costs associated with increased potential for erosion and reservoir sedimentation would raise the costs due to increased evaporation from more extensive shallows in the Pecos River as it enters Brantley Reservoir. Actions such as dredging are unlikely given the conservative amount of sediment calculated (about 1% of the reservoir pool). The potential for water salvage was identi?ed as the only tangible bene?t likely to be realized under the current control strategy. Estimates of evapotranspiration (ET) using Landsat TM data allowed estimation of potential water salvage as the difference in ET before and after treatment, an amount totaling 7.41 million m3 (6010 acre-ft) per year. Previous saltcedar control efforts of roughly the same magnitude found that salvaged ET recharged groundwater and no additional ?ows were realized within the river. Thus, the value of this recharge is probably less than the lowest value quoted for actual in-channel ?ow, and estimated to be\$63,000 per year. Though couched in terms of costs and bene?ts, this paper is focused on what can be considered the key trade-off under a complete eradication strategy: water salvage vs. erosion and sedimentation. It differs from previous efforts by focusing on evaluating the impacts of actual control efforts within a speci?c system. Total costs (direct plus potential indirect) far outweighed bene?ts in this simple comparison and are expected to be ongoing. Problems induced by saltcedar control may permanently reduce reservoir capacity and increase reservoir evaporation rates, which could further deplete supplies on this water short system. These potential negative consequences highlight that such costs and bene?ts need to be considered before initiating extensive saltcedar control programs on river systems of the western United States.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Tamaricaceae,Tamarix,Tamarix aphylla,,Saltcedar,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,study area that comprises 370 km (230 mi) of the riparian corridor between Sumner and Brantley dams,9,NA,North America,USA,New Mexico,Pecos River,Unit (2416 ha ),3 years,Period,2002,2004,2002,2004,Potentially ongoing,2200000,,6400000,2997987.955,2997987.955,733333.3333,999329.3182,999329.3182,USD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Direct costs of Arial Herbicide spraying, root extraction and mulching, seedling and planning costs,  along a river",,
SC1226,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,2269000,,,3850081.347,3850081.347,2269000,3850081.347,3850081.347,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Secondary costs from leafy spurge infestations on grazing land,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1233,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,2389000,,,7168329.061,7168329.061,3821000,7168329.061,7168329.061,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct costs,Marina Golivets,
SC1236,TC,Linc2012,"Efektivita likvidace invazních druh? v ?eské republice na p?íkladu bolševníku velkolepého [The
efficiency of eradication of invasive species in the Czech Republic exemplified by Heracleum mantegazzianum].",Linc,"The aim of this work is to estimate the damage to environment caused by invasive plant Giant Hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) in Czech Republic. Using the replacement costs method I found that the damages reach about 2.5 millions CZK each year. That equals amount of money annualy spent on eradication of Giant Hogweed by government. Model of elimination of the plant in CR subsequently revealed that the costs of its total eradication equals about 170 millions CZK a year in a five year project. Such project would be uneconomical at present, but postponing the solution causes nearly exponential increase of its future costs. //Cílem této práce je odhadnout, jaké ekonomické škody v ?eské republice zp?sobuje kv?li znehodnocení ?ivotního prost?edí invazní druh bolševník velkolepý (Heracleum mantegazzianum). Metodou náklad? na obnovu bylo zjišt?no, ?e škody ro?n? dosahují výše zhruba 2,5 milionu korun. To odpovídá sum?, kterou stát v sou?asné dob? na likvidaci bolševníku velkolepého vynakládá. Model celkové likvidace následn? ukázal, ?e náklady na kompletní vymýcení rostliny z území ?R, by se m?ly rovnat ?ástce odhadem 170 milion? korun ro?n? po dobu p?ti let. V sou?asnosti by sice byl takový projekt ekonomicky nevýhodný, odkládání komplexn?jšího zásahu ale zp?sobuje tém?? exponenciální r?st náklad? takového opat?ení v budoucnosti.",2012,Czech,Bc. thesis,"Pysek et al. (2012) Plant invasions in the Czech Republic: current state, introduction dynamics, invasive species and invaded habitats. Preslia 84: 575–629",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Czech Republic,NA,NA,Country,2001-2010 ,Year,2001,2010,2001,2010,Potentially ongoing,2490643,,,135822.5507,199964.3687,2490643,135822.5507,199964.3687,CZK,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"Abstract: ""Using the replacement costs method I found that the damages reach about 2.5 millions CZK each year. That equals amount of money annualy spent on eradication of Giant Hogweed by government."" Precise cost estimate, and further description in Czech, on pp29.",Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC1237,,Wotton2004,Eradication success Down Under: heat treatment of a sunken trawler to kill the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida.,"Wotton, D.M., C. O’Brien, M.D. Stuart and D.J. Fergus.","Eradication of invasive species is difficult in the marine environment, and there have only been a few successes. We report the successful eradication of the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida from a sunken trawler in the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. New heat-treatment methods were developed as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable option to kill Undaria. Monitoring of the trawler for three years after it sank found no Undaria after the vessel was treated. Key factors in the success of the eradication programme included: early detection, a rapid response, pre-existing knowledge of Undaria, an adaptive management approach, targeting of multiple life history stages, and the cooperation of the vessel's insurer.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,Schaffelke2007,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Wakame,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,"20 m of water in sandy habitat, about 2.2 km from the nearest rocky reef.",11,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,"Hanson Bay, Chatham Island",Unit (sunken trawler),2000-2003,Year,2000,2000,2000,2000,One-time,2500000,,,1616722.18,2465425.32,2500000,1616722.18,2465425.32,NZD,2000,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,salvage attempts; insurance comparny for sunken trawler paid for all costs,Jane Catford,
SC1241,,LSSG1999,Leafy Spurge Impact Assessment,Leafy Spurge Stakeholders Group (LSSG),[contains a lengthy executive summary],1999,English,Official report,Rempel2010,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,Canada,Manitoba,,Site,1999-2009,Year,1999,2009,1999,2009,One-time,2505000,,,2481094.956,3095518.793,2505000,2481094.956,3095518.793,CAD,1999,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Direct and indirect economic impact on recreation and water conservation on public lands; I put 2009 here because a new, updated report was published in 2010, so it makes sense to assume that those costs occurred until then",Marina Golivets,
SC1242,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,mink,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Site,Year,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,2544295,,,4419303.013,4072455.794,2544295,4419303.013,4072455.794,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp162: Value of loss of water voles between 1990 and 1998, based on willingness to pay. Considered as an ongoing annual cost, ""as people are not able to gain enjoyment from the water vole that no longer exist.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1243,,Bangsund1991a,"Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1991b,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,,Site,1990,Year,1990,1991,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,2567000,,,4815781.392,4815781.392,2567000,4815781.392,4815781.392,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare/Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS TO WYOMING'S ECONOMY ASSOCIATED WITH LEAFY SPURGE INFESTATIONS ON GRAZING LANDS, 1990",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk ,Yes
SC1246,,Holland2007,"Assessing the economic impact of invasive species: The case of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solsitialis L.) in the rangelands of Idaho, USA invasive species,  yellow starthistle (Centaurea solsitialis L.),  economic impact,  Idaho rangelands  Yellow star",Julia  R  Holland  DW  Guenthner  J,"Yellow starthistle (Centaurea solsitialis L.) is an invasive weed that creates problems for the management of Idaho's rangelands. A bioeconomic approach combined with an input–output economic model is used to estimate direct and secondary economic costs of the weed in relation to its interference with agricultural and non-agricultural benefits that rangelands provide. Direct economic costs of the infestations were estimated to be of 8.2 million ‘05 dollars per year, and secondary costs of 4.5 million ‘05 dollars per year, for a total of 12.7 million ‘05 dollars; agricultural related economic impacts accounted for 79% of this total cost, and non-agricultural for 21%.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea solstitialis,,Yellow starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,Idaho,Site,Between 1980 and 2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1980,2007,Potentially ongoing,2612000,none,none,3278441.741,3278441.741,2612000,3278441.741,3278441.741,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment/Fishery/Forestry/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Camille Bernery,
SC1248,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Macedonia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,2700000,,,4095453.189,152530.0765,2700000,4095453.189,152530.0765,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1253,,DeRos2015,"The economic impact of invasive pest Drosophila suzukii on berry production in the Province of Trento, Italy","De Ros, G., Conci, S., Pantezzi, T., Gianluca, S.","BACKGROUND:
The fly Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) is an endemic pest, native to Southern Asia which has recently invaded western countries. Since its detection in 2008 in California and Spain, it is now established in North America and in many European countries.

OBJECTIVE:
This paper aims to evaluate the pest’s economic impact on the soft fruit industry in the Province of Trento, a region in the North East of Italy, which is one of the most productive soft fruit areas in Europe.

METHODS:
The evaluation takes into account both the growers’ potential revenue losses and the costs of pest control and uses a partial budgeting approach. Two scenarios are evaluated: the one before and the one after the implementation of an integrated control strategy for D. suzukii.

RESULTS:
Before the adoption of an integrated pest control strategy, the estimated revenue losses amounted to about 13% of the industry’s output. After the implementation of an integrated strategy this loss decreased to about 7% of the industry’s output.

CONCLUSIONS:
The adopted strategy seems effective in mitigating the pest’s economic impact. The knowledge about D. suzukii’s impact and its management would benefit from further analysis encompassing a larger geographical scope and longer time series.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Drosophilidae,Drosophila,Drosophila suzukii,,Spotted Wing Drosophila,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Europe,Italy,,Trento,Site,2011,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,One-time,2862656,,,4342175.423,4111681.332,2862656,4342175.423,4111681.332,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,1092/SC1253,no,Potential revenue losses before the implementation of an integrated control strategy,Ross Cuthbert,No
SC1258,,Wallace1992,Economic impact of leafy spurge on North Dakota wildland,Wallace et al,,1992,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,2953795,,,5316279.75,5316279.75,2953795,5316279.75,5316279.75,USD,1991,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Direct economic impact (reduced expenditures) of reduced wildlife-associated recreation due to the current leafy spurge infestation on wildland""; wildland area 4899000 acres of which 467996 are invaded by leafy spurge",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1259,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Czech Republic,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,4550503.543,244965.9255,3000000,4550503.543,244965.9255,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1260,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Switzerland,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,4550503.543,,3000000,4550503.543,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1262,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Crassulaceae,Crassula,Crassula helmsii,,Australian swamp stonecrop,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,freshwater,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,5210837.988,4801867.465,3000000,5210837.988,4801867.465,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp115. Potential duplication with Reference 9015 (Oreska and Aldridge) - both studies report potentially ongoing costs post-2009.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1263,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Azolla,Azolla filiculoides,,water fern,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,freshwater,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,5210837.988,4801867.465,3000000,5210837.988,4801867.465,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp115. Potential duplication with Reference 9015 (Oreska and Aldridge) - both studies report potentially ongoing costs post-2009.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1264,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum aquaticum,,parrot's feather,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,freshwater,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,5210837.988,4801867.465,3000000,5210837.988,4801867.465,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp115. Potential duplication with Reference 9015 (Oreska and Aldridge) - both studies report potentially ongoing costs post-2009.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1265,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Lagarosiphon,Lagarosiphon major,,curly water weed,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,freshwater,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,3000000,,,5210837.988,4801867.465,3000000,5210837.988,4801867.465,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp115. Potential duplication with Reference 9015 (Oreska and Aldridge) - both studies report potentially ongoing costs post-2009.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1269,GS,,"Economic appraisal of the public control and prevention strategy against the 2010 West Nile Virus outbreak in Central Macedonia, Greece","A. Kolimenakis, K. Bithas, C. Richardson, D. Latinopoulos, A. Baka, A. Vakali, C. Hadjichristodoulou, S. Mourelatos, S. Kalaitzopoulou, S. Gewehr, A. Michaelakis, G. Koliopoulous","Objectives
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of the public control and prevention strategies to tackle the 2010 West Nile Virus (WNV) outbreak in the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Efficiency is examined on the basis of the public prevention costs incurred and their potential in justifying the costs arising from health and nuisance impacts in the succeeding years.

Study design
Economic appraisal of public health management interventions.

Methods
Prevention and control cost categories including control programmes, contingency planning and blood safety testing, are analyzed based on market prices. A separate cost of illness approach is conducted for the estimation of medical costs and productivity losses from 2010 to 2013 and for the calculation of averted health impacts. The averted mosquito nuisance costs to households are estimated on the basis of a contingent valuation study. Based on these findings, a limited cost-benefit analysis is employed in order to evaluate the economic efficiency of these strategies in 2010–2013.

Results
Results indicate that cost of illness and prevention costs fell significantly in the years following the 2010 outbreak, also as a result of the epidemic coming under control. According to the contingent valuation survey, the annual average willingness to pay to eliminate the mosquito problem in the study area ranged between 22 and 27 € per household. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that the aggregate benefit of implementing the previous 3-year strategy creates a net socio-economic benefit in 2013. However the spread of the WNV epidemic and the overall socio-economic consequences, had the various costs not been employed, remain unpredictable and extremely difficult to calculate.

Conclusions
The application of a post epidemic strategy appears to be of utmost importance for public health safety. An updated well designed survey is needed for a more precise definition of the optimum prevention policies and levels and for the establishment of the various cost/benefit parameters.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Greece,Macedonia,Region Of Central Macedonia,Site,2013,Year,2013,Unspecified,2013,2013,One-time,3052000,,,4265041.824,5086985.043,3052000,4265041.824,5086985.043,EUR,2013,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC1271,GS,VanWyk2002,The cost of water hyacinth control in South Africa: a case study of three options,"Van Wyk,E., Van Wilgen, B.W.","The aquatic plant water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) was first recorded in South Africa during the early part of the 20th century.
The plant has since spread across the country and is found in water bodies in both sub-tropical and temperate areas. The biology,
ecology and impacts of water hyacinth are well studied, but sound and cost-effective management of it remains an enormous challenge
in South Africa. Since the 1970s, control programmes have focused on the use of herbicides, with some success, while biological
and integrated control have historically received less effort and investment, despite the successes of the latter control
approaches in other parts of Africa and elsewhere in the world. The reasons for the relative successes and challenges associated
with the various control approaches vary substantially. Herbicidal control has been an effective short-term solution with highly visible
results. However, the cases used in this study show that herbicidal control is approximately five times (R1 481/ha) less costeffective
than either biological or integrated control, mainly because it requires resource-intensive follow-up procedures.
The effectiveness of large-scale herbicidal control has mainly been influenced by inappropriate field application, plus management
and institutional inconsistencies. Biological control offers a longer term, cheaper (R309/ha and potentially R3.60/ha) and less
resource-intensive solution compared to herbicidal treatment, but the effectiveness of this approach relies heavily on the successful
release of control agents, the ability of biocontrol agents to thrive under a range of climatic conditions and the extent to
which affected water bodies are nutrient-enriched. Based on the analysis here, integrated control was the most cost-effective control
option at an average cost of R277/ha. This approach enables managers to integrate selected aspects of herbicidal and biological
control and it is also more likely to facilitate the development of partnerships in water hyacinth control programs. Discussion
of a possible ‘no control’ option suggests that the economic and environmental costs of no control may be far greater than any
control.
Recommendations include: the selection of appropriate management option/s should be based on management needs across
different time scales and on objective cost-benefit information — this will help to determine how the costs and benefits of different
control approaches could be distributed amongst those who pay for and benefit from the management of water hyacinth.
Successful management will also rely on selecting appropriate and sound ecological approaches suited to local conditions; management
will also need to facilitate the integration of control efforts at the catchment level as well as institutional and partnership
integration to ensure continuity in the ownership of water hyacinth control.",2002,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Africa,South Africa,,Hartbeespoort Dam,Site,1977,Year,1977,1977,1977,1977,One-time,3129248,,,1387786.921,2485530.894,3129248,1387786.921,2485530.894,ZAR,1995,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,
SC1279,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,sewer systems,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,3243758,,,5634232.47,5192032.002,3243758,5634232.47,5192032.002,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp141: cost of baiting to control rats in sewer systems. Report also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC1282,,,Predicting the economic benefits and costs of introducing new biological control agents for Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius into New Zealand,"Jarvis PJ, Fowler SV, Paynter Q, Syrett P",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Cytisus,Cytisus scoparius,,Scotch broom,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4b\12b,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1985,Year,1985,1985,1985,1985,Potentially ongoing,3308000,,,2576087.521,3393006.556,3308000,2576087.521,3393006.556,NZD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Chemical control only. Benefits from farming production on land currently covered by broom directly attributable to broom control 4968000 NZD annually (then add costs incurred on top equals 8.366millionNZD. Also gives costs to beekeepers of broom control i.e. an estimation of ontribution of broom as a benefit nealry 2.5 million,,
SC1286,,Grundy1990,An economic evaluation of biological control of sweet brier,Grundy TP,,1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rosa,Rosa rubiginosa,,sweet brier,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4b\12b,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,Potentially ongoing,3350000,2100000,4600000,4549068.414,4523198.227,3350000,4549068.414,4523198.227,NZD,1988,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,"Costs in Table 12, pg 33. Benefits as shelter & fodder plant. Official report from 1989, converted in peer review article 1990",,
SC1288,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Caesalpinia,Caesalpinia decapetala,,Thorny poinciana/Mysore thorn/Mubage/Mauritius thorn/Cat's claw,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Indian Ocean Coastal Belt biome,5,N,Africa,South Africa,,Indian Ocean Coastal Belt Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,3400000,,,468558.1443,949013.416,226666.6667,31237.20962,63267.56106,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1293,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Asia,Russia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,3500000,,,5308920.8,,3500000,5308920.8,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,
SC1294,TC,Rochat2006,Dossier: Le charançon rouge du palmier dans le bassin méditerranéen,Rochat et al.,"Si tous deux sont des ravageurs des palmiers récemment introduits en France, le charançon rouge du palmier Rhynchophorus ferrugineus est sans doute bien plus problématique que Paysandisia archon voir Phytoma-LDV n° s 594 et Reynaud & al., 2002). Son explosion récente dans le bassin méditerranéen constitue une menace pour tous les pays riverains, France comprise. Qui est-il ? Quel danger représente-t-il ? Quels moyens avons-nous de nous en prémunir, de le détecter et de le combattre ? Réponse dans cet article destiné à sensibiliser sur le risque grave que cet insecte représente pour la France et le Maghreb.",2006,French,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Dryophthoridae,Rhynchophorus,Rhynchophorus ferrugineus,,red palm weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,NA,Country,10 years,Period,1997,2006,1997,2006,Potentially ongoing,3500000,2000000,5000000,5343482.344,5776261.551,350000,534348.2344,577626.1551,EUR,2006,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"L’Espagne a engagé entre 2 et 5 millions d’euros depuis 10 ans sans juguler le foyer initial. Not completely clear, but assume this is the total cost over the 10 years.",Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC1295,TC,MX1,The impact of invasive alien species on ecosystem services and human well-being.,"Pejchar, L. Mooney, H.",,2010,English,Book chapter,"Revollo Fernandez, D. 2019. Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",No,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Mejillon cebra,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,Canada/USA,,Big Lakes Of Usa And Canada,Site,2010,Period,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,3500000,,,3934404.506,,3500000,3934404.506,,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC1297,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Gastropoda,Littorinomorpha,Calyptraeidae,Crepidula,Crepidula porcellana,,slipper limpet,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,3530000,,,6131419.366,5650197.384,3530000,6131419.366,5650197.384,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp105: cost to scallop industry. Reduced catch + increased time to sort and clean catch. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1298,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,3553000,,,10729043.16,10729043.16,5719000,10729043.16,10729043.16,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct costs,Marina Golivets,
SC1301,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Slovakia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,3600000,,,5460604.251,7746681.995,3600000,5460604.251,7746681.995,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1303,,Nealis2002,"Gypsy moth in Canada: case study of an invasive insect. Pages 151-159 in Claudi et al. (2002) Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests",Nealis V.G.,"[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) is a native insect of Eurasia where it feeds on the leaves of broadleaf trees, especially oaks (Quercus spp.). Populations of gypsy moth increase periodically to very high local densities and severely defoliate preferred host trees (Elkinton and Liebhold 1990). In its native range, gypsy moth displays highly variable biological characteristics. The most significant life-history variations relevant to invasiveness are the geographic differences in flight capability of adult females and host food range of the larvae. Female moths from western (European) populations are flightless, while those from eastern (Asian) populations are capable of strong, directed flight. Gypsy moth larvae feed on a wide variety of mostly broadleaf tree hosts throughout their geographic range, but Asian populations also feed on coniferous tree species and therefore are of even greater concern to Canada than the European populations.
A European strain of the gypsy moth escaped from a laboratory near Boston, MA, in 1869. Since then, gypsy moth has spread and become established in the temperate forests of eastern North America, approximately between latitudes 36° and 47°N, and from the Atlantic coast to the Great Lakes basin as far as 90°W. During this same period, there have been repeated interceptions of both European and Asian strains of gypsy moth in western North America but, as yet (2000), neither strain is regarded as established there.
The North American experience with gypsy moth is an instructive case study of an invasive spe cies. There has been a well-documented public and scientific response to the problems caused by gypsy moth that can serve as a historical lesson for managing local and national environments in the global village. Scientific information on gypsy moth is probably as thorough as that on any invasive forest insect. Public policy on managing gypsy moth has ranged from neglect to aggressive mitigative action at considerable public cost and sometimes with dire environmental conse quences.
We can compare actions in the United States and Canada from distinct historical and legislative perspectives. As a case study in Canada, we can examine the impacts of establishment and spread of this alien species in eastern Canada and analyze the feasibility and benefits of maintaining gypsy moth-free regions by coordinating national and regional management activities. Discussion here emphasizes history and status of the European strain of gypsy moth now widely established in eastern North America and threatening to extend its range. Regulatory agencies now refer to this European strain as the North American gypsy moth, although it remains an alien species. Issues discussed here, however, pertain equally to the Asian strain of gypsy moth.
Attributes of an Invader
The gypsy moth has several biological and ecological attributes that favor its success as an invasive
species. Gypsy moth has a broad native geographic range that presents many potential sources of introduction. Also, the insect tolerates a wide range of climatic conditions and feeds on many different tree species. Thus gypsy moth has a high probability of persistence in temperate forests worldwide. The reproductive biology of gypsy moth also favors colonization. Adult females may produce more than 1000 offspring in a single egg mass, so even one female can contribute a sizable founding population.
The greatest limitation of gypsy moth as an invasive species is that it is a poor disperser over long distances. The female adult moth of the European strain is flightless. Natural dispersal is restricted to relatively short distance ballooning of newly hatched larvae (Elkinton and Liebhold 1990), making gypsy moth’s surreptitious association with humans significant. Many of the host plants that gypsy moth favors flourish in habitats associated with human settlement. Further, gypsy moths frequently leave their host plants to lay eggs in sheltered locations and these are often structures associated with humans, such as firewood and outdoor household goods. When these goods are moved, the gypsy moth moves with them. Thus, although some spread of gypsy moth along the margins of its range in North America can be accounted for by natural dispersal of small larvae, inadvertent movement of egg masses, by a mobile human population, is the source of most new infestations in areas remote from the established populations, particularly those in western North America.

",2002,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,south Vancouver Island,NA,NA,North America,Canada,British Columbia,Vancouver Island,"Unit (13,000 ha)",1999,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,3700000,NA,NA,3210808.838,4101468.561,3700000,3210808.838,4101468.561,CAD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp154 ""In 1999, 13 000 ha of south Vancouver Island were treated at a cost of Can$3.7 million (P. Hall, British Columbia Ministry of Forests, personal communication)."" Reflects ""operational costs for the local spray and public relations programs only. The cost of research and monitoring including salaries are extra and difficult to obtain reliably from the accounting methods used.""",Nigel Taylor,
SC1304,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Ethiopia,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,3700000,,,3611779.283,9935220.404,3700000,3611779.283,9935220.404,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1305,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Anseriformes,Anatidae,Oxyura,Oxyura jamaicensis,,ruddy duck,Semi-aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,NA,Country,5 years,Period,2010,Unspecified,2010,2014,One-time,3700000,,,6426700.186,5922303.207,740000,1285340.037,1184460.641,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,SC1305/1882 ,no,"Table 13.1 Defra Research funding: Ruddy duck research and policy (including LIFE funding). Annual cost estimate taken from report, not calculated within this database. Partial double counting with LIFE funding on pp150.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1306,,Coombs1996,"Economic and Regional Benefits from the Biological Control of Tansy Ragwort, Senecio Jacobaea, (Asteraceae) in Oregon","Coombs, E.M., H. Radtke, D.L. Isaacson, and S.P. Snyder.","Successful biological control of tansy ragwort in Oregon provides an estimated annual benefit of more than US$5 million, with a minimum benefit-to-cost ratio of 13:1. Losses of livestock have been reduced by $3.7 million/year. Additional savings have accrued through increased productivity of pastures ($1.27 million/year) and by reducing herbicide use ($0.85 million/year). Control of ragwort was achieved at a cost of about $5/ha. Non-market benefits include return of desirable flora in habitats once dominated by ragwort and a reduction in herbicide in the environment. Several correlative observations substantiate evidence used in estimating benefits of the regional control of ragwort. In western Oregon, control of ragwort reduced propagule production, which correlated with a decline in the number of new infestations in eastern Oregon, despite increased detection efforts. The number of releases of the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae, the ragwort flea beetle, Longitarsus jacobaeae, and the number of cattle deaths attributed to pyrrolizidine poisoning both decreased by more than 90% in relation to declining ragwort densities.",1996,English,Conference proceedings,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio jacobaea,,ragwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,Western Oregeon,Site,1 year,Year,1974,1974,1974,1974,One-time,3726219,,,18523628.5,18523628.5,3726219,18523628.5,18523628.5,USD,1974,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Estimated cattle revenue losses in western oregon due to ragwort poisening,,
SC1307,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,3800000,,,5763971.154,,3800000,5763971.154,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1308,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Croatia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,3800000,,,5763971.154,1103471.93,3800000,5763971.154,1103471.93,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1311,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum mauritianum,,Bugweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,3900000,,,270780.398,677282.7666,195000,13539.0199,33864.13833,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1313,TC,NME2007,Strategy on Invasive Alien Species,Norwegian Ministry of the Environment,"[First page of text] CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The introduction of invasive alien species is considered to be one of the most serious threats to global biodiversity. Alien species can also have substantial economic and social impacts.
People have moved plant and animal species to new areas throughout history: often, this has been for our own benefit, to use them as agricultural crops or livestock. In many cases, the consequences of such introductions have been mainly positive or neutral.
More recently, there has been a considerable rise in introductions of alien species, particularly as a result of changes in international patterns of transport and trade. This has resulted in growing awareness of the negative impacts certain species can have when they are introduced outside their natural distribution ranges.
In Norway, too, the introduction and spread of invasive alien species is a serious and growing threat to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and has already inflicted heavy costs on society.
Dealing with alien species involves a complex set of challenges. Most introduced species are not able to survive and spread in the wild. Others become established without harming the ecosystems where they are introduced. But some species both become established and cause significant damage to ecosystems, for example by displacing native species or spreading disease. These are known as invasive alien species, and they can have very serious negative impacts, both on ecosystems and biodiversity and on industries such as agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture that are based on the use of these ecosystems.
Measures to address the problem of invasive alien species in Norway will also be important in efforts to achieve the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010. Under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Norway has undertaken as far as possible and as appropriate to prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.
Many different bodies in a range of administrative sectors are responsible for action to address the problem of alien species and for administration and enforcement of legislation relating to the introduction, spread, and management and control of alien species. Effective action to reduce the threat from alien species therefore requires targeted and coordinated cross-sectoral efforts. The decision to draw up a cross-sectoral national strategy on alien species was taken in the 2005 white paper on the government’s environmental policy and the state of the environment in Norway (Report No. 21 (2004–2005) to the Storting) and the subsequent debate in the Storting.
This document describes Norway’s goals and principles for dealing with alien species and specific measures that will be implemented in all relevant administrative sectors. The strategy is intended to ensure that there is a common understanding and",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Cypriniformes,Cyprinidae,Phoxinus,Phoxinus phoxinus,,common minnow,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,Y,Europe,Norway,Diverse/Unspecified,Hardangervidda,Site,1999 and 2000,Period,1999,2000,1999,2000,One-time,4000000,,,806730.9651,529446.4475,2000000,403365.4826,264723.2238,NOK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp11: ""In 1999 and 2000, rotenone treatment was carried out to eradicate minnows from the Hardangervidda and prevent their spread to rivers in the central part of the plateau. The treatment cost about NOK 4 million, and has so far been successful."" Recorded as one-time and eradication cost, because it was a successful eradication.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1316,,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,,Washington,Site,1987,Year,1987,1987,1987,1987,One-time,4000000,,,5020584.596,5020584.596,4000000,5020584.596,5020584.596,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Other mitigation capital costs,Phillip Haubrock,
SC1317,,Olson2012,"Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 8. Eleutherodactylus planirostris, the Greenhouse Frog (Anura: Eleutherodactylidae)","Olson, CA; Beard, KH; Pitt, WC","The greenhouse frog, Eleutherodactylus planirostris, is a directdeveloping(i.e., no aquatic stage) frog native to Cuba and the Bahamas. It wasintroduced to Hawai‘i via nursery plants in the early 1990s and then subse quentlyfrom Hawai‘i to Guam in 2003. The greenhouse frog is now widespread on fiveHawaiian Islands and Guam. Infestations are often overlooked due to the frog’squiet calls, small size, and cryptic behavior, and this likely contributes to itsspread. Because the greenhouse frog is an insectivore, introductions may reduceinvertebrates. In Hawai‘i, the greenhouse frog primarily consumes ants, mites,and springtails and obtains densities of up to 12,500 frogs ha?1. At this density, itis estimated that they can consume up to 129,000 invertebrates ha?1 night?1.They are a food source for the nonnative brown tree snake in Guam and may bea food source for other nonnative species. They may also compete with otherinsectivores for available prey. The greatest direct economic impacts of the invasionsare to the nursery trade, which must treat infested shipments. Althoughvarious control methods have been developed to control frogs in Hawai‘i, andcitric acid, in particular, is effective in reducing greenhouse frogs, the frog’sinconspicuous nature often prevents populations from being identified andmanaged.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Amphibia,Anura,Eleutherodactylidae,Eleutherodactylus,Eleutherodactylus planirostris,,Greenhouse frog,Semi-Aquatic,terrestrial,Y,NA,2,N,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Unit (Island),2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,4000000,,,4270489.164,4270489.164,4000000,4270489.164,4270489.164,USD,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,control costs,Phillip Haubrock,
SC1318,,Schaffelke2007,Impacts of introduced seaweeds,"Schaffelke, B., Hewitt, C.L.","We analyzed 69 publications on the impacts of introduced
seaweeds. The predominant impacts were
changed competitive relationships in the recipient habitat,
indicated by high abundances of invaders, resultant
space monopolization, and reduced abundances/biomass
of native macrophytes. Changes in biodiversity,
effects on fish and invertebrate fauna, toxic effects on
other biota, and habitat change were also identified. The
mechanisms underlying the manifestation of impacts are
uncertain and inferences about common patterns were
hampered because impact studies were available for only
a few introduced seaweeds, covered only a fraction of
their introduced distribution and generally were conducted
over short time scales. There was no information
about evolutionary effects or changes of ecosystem
processes. Knowledge of socio-economic impacts of
invasive seaweeds is poor. We collated costs associated
with control/eradication activities and for national spending
on marine biosecurity in Australia, New Zealand and
the United States. Prevention of impacts is the driving
force for costly surveillance, eradication and control programs.
Until we are able to understand, predict and
measure impacts of introduced seaweeds, the management
of species incursions needs to remain focused on
early detection, rapid response and control to reduce the
likelihood of negative impact effects.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Caulerpaceae,Caulerpa,Caulerpa taxifolia,,Killer algae,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,NA,11,N,Oceania,Australia,,South Australia,Site,2004-2007,Period,2004,2007,2004,2007,One-time,4000000,,,4863684.841,4602699.754,1000000,1215921.21,1150674.939,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"South Australia, freshwater treatment -  personal communication.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC1320,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea nuttallii,,Nuttall's pond weed,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,freshwater,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,6947783.984,6402489.954,4000000,6947783.984,6402489.954,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp115. Potential duplication with Reference 9015 (Oreska and Aldridge) - both studies report potentially ongoing costs post-2009.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1321,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,boat hulls,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England,Site,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,4000000,,,6947783.984,6402489.954,4000000,6947783.984,6402489.954,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp137: cost of cleaning zebra mussels from boat hulls, from Oreska (2009). Cost reported for England only.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1322,GS,,"Economic appraisal of the public control and prevention strategy against the 2010 West Nile Virus outbreak in Central Macedonia, Greece","A. Kolimenakis, K. Bithas, C. Richardson, D. Latinopoulos, A. Baka, A. Vakali, C. Hadjichristodoulou, S. Mourelatos, S. Kalaitzopoulou, S. Gewehr, A. Michaelakis, G. Koliopoulous","Objectives
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of the public control and prevention strategies to tackle the 2010 West Nile Virus (WNV) outbreak in the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Efficiency is examined on the basis of the public prevention costs incurred and their potential in justifying the costs arising from health and nuisance impacts in the succeeding years.

Study design
Economic appraisal of public health management interventions.

Methods
Prevention and control cost categories including control programmes, contingency planning and blood safety testing, are analyzed based on market prices. A separate cost of illness approach is conducted for the estimation of medical costs and productivity losses from 2010 to 2013 and for the calculation of averted health impacts. The averted mosquito nuisance costs to households are estimated on the basis of a contingent valuation study. Based on these findings, a limited cost-benefit analysis is employed in order to evaluate the economic efficiency of these strategies in 2010–2013.

Results
Results indicate that cost of illness and prevention costs fell significantly in the years following the 2010 outbreak, also as a result of the epidemic coming under control. According to the contingent valuation survey, the annual average willingness to pay to eliminate the mosquito problem in the study area ranged between 22 and 27 € per household. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that the aggregate benefit of implementing the previous 3-year strategy creates a net socio-economic benefit in 2013. However the spread of the WNV epidemic and the overall socio-economic consequences, had the various costs not been employed, remain unpredictable and extremely difficult to calculate.

Conclusions
The application of a post epidemic strategy appears to be of utmost importance for public health safety. An updated well designed survey is needed for a more precise definition of the optimum prevention policies and levels and for the establishment of the various cost/benefit parameters.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Greece,Macedonia,Region Of Central Macedonia,Site,2012,Year,2012,Unspecified,2012,2012,One-time,4002000,,,5489419.44,6240478.029,4002000,5489419.44,6240478.029,EUR,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC1329,WoS,Bekele2018,Economic impacts of Prosopis spp. invasions on dryland ecosystem services in Ethiopia and Kenya: Evidence from choice experimental data,Bekele et al.,"Biological invasions can induce trajectories of changes that make ecosystems fragile and less reliable in providing services and goods. Here we set out to assess the economic value of dry land ecosystem services affected by the invasive tree Prosopis, which was originally introduced in Africa and elsewhere for providing firewood, animal fodder and other services to rural people. Based on choice experiment method, we estimated the economic values of dry land ecosystem services affected by Prosopis in the heavily invaded Afar region, Ethiopia and Baringo County, Kenya. Including labor and cash contributions as payment attributes, a random parameters logit model was employed for analyzing households' preferences for the affected ecosystem services. We found that, despite the services provided by Prosopis, households from both regions were willing to pay for its management primarily driven by biodiversity and water. WTP was on average higher in Afar (USD 50.42/year) than in Baringo (USD 37.74/year), which may be because the ecosystems in Afar were less degraded prior to the invasion by Prosopis than in Baringo and that charcoal production in Afar is officially prohibited. Our results indicate that the costs imposed by the deliberately introduced Prosopis outweigh its benefits in both Afar and Baringo.",2018,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Prosopis,Prosopis juliflora,,Prosopis,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Main vegetation types in the study area  comprise bush land, shrub land, riverine forests, grasslands and seasonal marshes and swamps",3\4\9\10,N,Africa,Kenya,,Baringo County,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,4200000,,,4099857.564,8311500.216,4200000,4099857.564,8311500.216,USD,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,"The cost estimate is based on willingness to pay economic valuation method. The cost represents social costs if the invasion continues or social benefit if the invasion is managed. Hence, the same cost is specified under cost estimate and benefit values.",Justice Tambo,
SC1332,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forest biome,1,N,Africa,South Africa,,Forest Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,4300000,,,592588.2414,1200222.85,286666.6667,39505.88276,80014.85664,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1337,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa destructor,,varroa mite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,bee hives,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,4440275,,,7712517.883,7107204.02,4440275,7712517.883,7107204.02,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp65: cost of managing hives to control varroa mite. Report also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1339,,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,none available,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,Mack2000,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Melaleuca,Melaleuca quinquenervia,,melaleuca tree,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,4500000,3000000,6000000,6405564.024,6405564.024,4500000,6405564.024,6405564.024,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1343,GS,,"Economic appraisal of the public control and prevention strategy against the 2010 West Nile Virus outbreak in Central Macedonia, Greece","A. Kolimenakis, K. Bithas, C. Richardson, D. Latinopoulos, A. Baka, A. Vakali, C. Hadjichristodoulou, S. Mourelatos, S. Kalaitzopoulou, S. Gewehr, A. Michaelakis, G. Koliopoulous","Objectives
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of the public control and prevention strategies to tackle the 2010 West Nile Virus (WNV) outbreak in the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Efficiency is examined on the basis of the public prevention costs incurred and their potential in justifying the costs arising from health and nuisance impacts in the succeeding years.

Study design
Economic appraisal of public health management interventions.

Methods
Prevention and control cost categories including control programmes, contingency planning and blood safety testing, are analyzed based on market prices. A separate cost of illness approach is conducted for the estimation of medical costs and productivity losses from 2010 to 2013 and for the calculation of averted health impacts. The averted mosquito nuisance costs to households are estimated on the basis of a contingent valuation study. Based on these findings, a limited cost-benefit analysis is employed in order to evaluate the economic efficiency of these strategies in 2010–2013.

Results
Results indicate that cost of illness and prevention costs fell significantly in the years following the 2010 outbreak, also as a result of the epidemic coming under control. According to the contingent valuation survey, the annual average willingness to pay to eliminate the mosquito problem in the study area ranged between 22 and 27 € per household. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that the aggregate benefit of implementing the previous 3-year strategy creates a net socio-economic benefit in 2013. However the spread of the WNV epidemic and the overall socio-economic consequences, had the various costs not been employed, remain unpredictable and extremely difficult to calculate.

Conclusions
The application of a post epidemic strategy appears to be of utmost importance for public health safety. An updated well designed survey is needed for a more precise definition of the optimum prevention policies and levels and for the establishment of the various cost/benefit parameters.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Greece,Macedonia,Region Of Central Macedonia,Site,2011,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,One-time,4600000,,,6977438.766,7028812.468,4600000,6977438.766,7028812.468,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC1344,,Martin2013,"The Runaway Weed: Costs and Failures of Phragmites australis Management in the USA Invasive species, Management, Phragmites australis, Restoration, Economic survey ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, LARVAL AMPHIBIANS, NORTH-AMERICA, INVASION, PLANTS, SPARTINA,",Martin LJ Blossey B,"While public funding of invasive species management has increased substantially in the past decade, there have been few cross-institutional assessments of management programs. We assessed management of Phragmites australis, a problematic invader of coastal habitats, through a cross-institutional economic survey of 285 land managers from US public and private conservation organizations. We found that from 2005 to 2009, these organizations spent >$4.6 million per year on P. australis management, and that 94 % used herbicide to treat a total area of ?80,000 ha. Despite these high expenditures, few organizations accomplished their management objectives. There was no relationship between resources invested in management and management success, and those organizations that endorsed a particular objective were no more likely to achieve it. Our results question the efficacy of current P. australis management strategies and call for future monitoring of biological management outcomes.",2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Phragmites,Phragmites australis,,common reed,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,10,N,North America,USA,,USA,Country,2013,Period,2005,2009,2005,2009,One-time,4600000,,,4840162.262,4840162.262,920000,968032.4523,968032.4523,USD,2013,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,herbicide and manual control costs of 85.000 ha,Phillip Haubrock,
SC1345,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Psidium,Psidium guajava,,Guava,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,4600000,,,319382.0079,798846.3401,230000,15969.1004,39942.317,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1347,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Poland,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,4700000,,,7129122.217,2843117.715,4700000,7129122.217,2843117.715,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1348,TC,ICES2005,"The intentional introduction of the marine red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus
into the Southern Barents Sea",ICES,"The red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) was intentionally transferred from areas in the
Northern Pacific Ocean to the Russian Barents Sea during the 1960s (1961–1969), to create a
new and valuable commercial resource. A reproductive population in the receptor region was
evident ten years later and from this time the species has continued to spread both north and
east in the Barents Sea and southwards along the coast of Northern Norway. Ecological impacts
upon the native fauna are investigated through, among others, analysis of the diet of the
crab, as molluscs, echinoderms, polychaetes and crustaceans are frequently found as prey
items.
Problems following the invasion of the red king crab are displayed as bycatch of crabs in gillnet-
and longline-fisheries. The crab is regarded as a commercial resource both in Russia and
Norway. Management of the red king crab is undertaken as a joint stock between Norway and
Russia through the Joint Russian-Norwegian Fishery Commission.",2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Lithodidae,Paralithodes,Paralithodes camtschaticus,,red king crab,Aquatic,aquatic,N,"Settlement of larvae in shallow waters (<20 m) usually takes place on sponges, bryozoans, and macroalgae. Adults occur on sand and mud substrata. The regions where... Spawning aggregations occur can also be found in shallow water where kelp occurs.",11,NA,Europe,Norway,NA,NA,Country,the available cost for 2003,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,4700000,,,915667.3496,655086.4256,4700000,915667.3496,655086.4256,NOK,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp14: ""The Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries has decided to launch a comprehensive research and surveillance program on the ecological impacts of the king crab in Norwegian waters in 2003. The research will be carried out by the Institute of Marine Research in cooperation with other research institutions in Norway. The program is planned to last for at least ten years and the available cost for 2003 is set at NOK 4.7 mill.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1350,,Zansler2004,The economic impacts to an industry associated with an invasive species: The case of citrus canker in Florida,MARISA LOUISE ZANSLER,,2004,English,PhD thesis,original Invacost search,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xanthomonas,Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri,,Citrus canker,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,4750000,,,6575591.232,6575591.232,4750000,6575591.232,6575591.232,USD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1352,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Slovenia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,4800000,,,7280805.669,8382826.074,4800000,7280805.669,8382826.074,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1356,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,Syringas,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,4900000,,,340211.2693,850945.0144,245000,17010.56346,42547.25072,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1357,,Nealis2002,"Gypsy moth in Canada: case study of an invasive insect. Pages 151-159 in Claudi et al. (2002) Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests",Nealis V.G.,"[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) is a native insect of Eurasia where it feeds on the leaves of broadleaf trees, especially oaks (Quercus spp.). Populations of gypsy moth increase periodically to very high local densities and severely defoliate preferred host trees (Elkinton and Liebhold 1990). In its native range, gypsy moth displays highly variable biological characteristics. The most significant life-history variations relevant to invasiveness are the geographic differences in flight capability of adult females and host food range of the larvae. Female moths from western (European) populations are flightless, while those from eastern (Asian) populations are capable of strong, directed flight. Gypsy moth larvae feed on a wide variety of mostly broadleaf tree hosts throughout their geographic range, but Asian populations also feed on coniferous tree species and therefore are of even greater concern to Canada than the European populations.
A European strain of the gypsy moth escaped from a laboratory near Boston, MA, in 1869. Since then, gypsy moth has spread and become established in the temperate forests of eastern North America, approximately between latitudes 36° and 47°N, and from the Atlantic coast to the Great Lakes basin as far as 90°W. During this same period, there have been repeated interceptions of both European and Asian strains of gypsy moth in western North America but, as yet (2000), neither strain is regarded as established there.
The North American experience with gypsy moth is an instructive case study of an invasive spe cies. There has been a well-documented public and scientific response to the problems caused by gypsy moth that can serve as a historical lesson for managing local and national environments in the global village. Scientific information on gypsy moth is probably as thorough as that on any invasive forest insect. Public policy on managing gypsy moth has ranged from neglect to aggressive mitigative action at considerable public cost and sometimes with dire environmental conse quences.
We can compare actions in the United States and Canada from distinct historical and legislative perspectives. As a case study in Canada, we can examine the impacts of establishment and spread of this alien species in eastern Canada and analyze the feasibility and benefits of maintaining gypsy moth-free regions by coordinating national and regional management activities. Discussion here emphasizes history and status of the European strain of gypsy moth now widely established in eastern North America and threatening to extend its range. Regulatory agencies now refer to this European strain as the North American gypsy moth, although it remains an alien species. Issues discussed here, however, pertain equally to the Asian strain of gypsy moth.
Attributes of an Invader
The gypsy moth has several biological and ecological attributes that favor its success as an invasive
species. Gypsy moth has a broad native geographic range that presents many potential sources of introduction. Also, the insect tolerates a wide range of climatic conditions and feeds on many different tree species. Thus gypsy moth has a high probability of persistence in temperate forests worldwide. The reproductive biology of gypsy moth also favors colonization. Adult females may produce more than 1000 offspring in a single egg mass, so even one female can contribute a sizable founding population.
The greatest limitation of gypsy moth as an invasive species is that it is a poor disperser over long distances. The female adult moth of the European strain is flightless. Natural dispersal is restricted to relatively short distance ballooning of newly hatched larvae (Elkinton and Liebhold 1990), making gypsy moth’s surreptitious association with humans significant. Many of the host plants that gypsy moth favors flourish in habitats associated with human settlement. Further, gypsy moths frequently leave their host plants to lay eggs in sheltered locations and these are often structures associated with humans, such as firewood and outdoor household goods. When these goods are moved, the gypsy moth moves with them. Thus, although some spread of gypsy moth along the margins of its range in North America can be accounted for by natural dispersal of small larvae, inadvertent movement of egg masses, by a mobile human population, is the source of most new infestations in areas remote from the established populations, particularly those in western North America.

",2002,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Canada,Ontario,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1986-1991,Period,1986,1991,1986,1991,One-time,5000000,NA,NA,4338930.862,5542525.083,833333.3333,723155.1437,923754.1805,CAD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp154 ""Treatments to suppress gypsy moth populations in Canada have been less extensive. The largest programs were carried out in Ontario between 1986 and 1991 when nearly 250 000 ha were treated almost exclu sively with Btk at an approximate cost of nearly Can$5 million (van Frankenhuyzen 1990; Nealis and Erb 1993)."" This cost is not taken from the cited references.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1360,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Elodea,Elodea canadensis,,Canadian pond weed,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,freshwater,10\11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,5000000,,,8684729.98,8003112.442,5000000,8684729.98,8003112.442,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp115. Potential duplication with Reference 9015 (Oreska and Aldridge) - both studies report potentially ongoing costs post-2009.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1361,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1981,Year,1981,1981,1981,1981,One-time,5005834,NA,NA,8048792.577,7570375.471,5005834,8048792.577,7570375.471,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1362,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,railways,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,5060000,,,8788946.74,8099149.792,5060000,8788946.74,8099149.792,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp133. Report also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1363,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,roadsides,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,5096000,,,8851476.796,8156772.201,5096000,8851476.796,8156772.201,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Roadsides cost for GB from Table 4.3, pp41. Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost (cost of spraying with herbicide + additional costs to road building projects that encounter knotweed).",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1364,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Sciuridae,Sciurus,Sciurus carolinensis,,grey squirrel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,houses,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,5128274,,,8907534.991,8208430.691,5128274,8907534.991,8208430.691,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp126: ""the damage done to houses can be estimated at £5,128,274 (England £4,699,593, Scotland £118,036 and Wales £310,645).""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1366,TC,MarylandDNR2004,Potential Economic Losses Associated With Uncontrolled Nutria Populations in Maryland's Portion of the Chesapeake Bay,Maryland Department of Natural Resources,"Nutria (Myocaster coypus) are non-native aquatic mammals that are having an
unprecedented negative effect on the marshes and ecology of the Chesapeake Bay. Since
their introduction in the 1930's, nutria populations have continued to expand. With their
high reproductive rate and voracious appetite for marsh grasses and root mats, they are
now damaging hundreds of acres of valuable wetlands each year and turning oncevegetated
areas into mudflats and open-water. These denuded areas no longer provide
rich spawning and nursery grounds and habitat for the many species of shellfish, fish and
wildlife that this region is known for. Although the effects of nutria cannot be easily
separated from other detrimental factors, they are widely believed to be a large
contributing cause of the decline in the quality and extent of Chesapeake Bay wetlands.
As more and more acres of Chesapeake Bay marshes are lost, the resulting declines in
commercially and recreationally-valuable species takes a measurable economic toll on
the State ofMaiyland and its citizens. Commercial harvesting of shellfish and finfish,
sport hunting and fishing, and wildlife viewing in Maryland all have strong connections
to the wetlands of the Chesapeake and these sectors suffer as the marshes deteriorate. In
order to assess the economic effects this decline represents, this report analyzed scientific
literature, expert opinions and economic indices for commercial and recreational uses of
marshland and marsh-associated species in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay.
If marshes continue to be lost at the current rate, the financial losses to the State of
Maryland and its citizens are summarized in Table E-1 and E-2, below. In Table E-1, it
is clear that the direct losses due to declines in commercially and recreationally-valued
species alone are considerable annually and over the next 50 years. In Table E-2, it is
demonstrated that the losses in environmental services provided by wetlands, and the
associated social losses add another layer to the costs.   Taken together, the figures represented in Tables E-1 and E-2 present a challenge to the
State of Maryland and its citizens. These losses can be mitigated and lessened
considerably if marsh loss is slowed by removal of nutria. Otherwise, the economic
ramifications of damage to Chesapeake Bay marshes in the past and into the future are
costly and will continue to increase unless the necessary actions are taken. The costs of
nutria removal are potentially minor compared to the costs to the State if the loss of
marsh habitats continues unabated.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Myocastoridae,Myocastor,Myocastor coypus,,nutria,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,Maryland's portion of the Chesapeake Bay; emergent wetlands,11,NA,North America,USA,Maryland,Chesapeake Bay,Unit (part of bay),"""current"" + ""2001"" ",Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,5147780,NA,NA,6680428.953,6680428.953,5147780,6680428.953,6680428.953,USD,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Sum of ""current annual losses"" from Table E1. Includes lost retail sales (e.g. from wildlife tourists), multiplier effects, reduced salaries, loss of tax revenues - all associate with fisheries, hunting and wildlife watching.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1369,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Lagomorpha,Leporidae,Oryctolagus,Oryctolagus cuniculus,,European rabbit,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,golf courses,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,5284000,,,9178022.643,8457689.229,5284000,9178022.643,8457689.229,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp109. Cost of management on golf courses. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1370,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,5291000,,,8977867.081,8977867.081,5291000,8977867.081,8977867.081,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Secondary costs from leafy spurge infestations on wildlands,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1375,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Tithonia,Tithonia diversifolia,,Tree marigold,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,5400000,,,374926.7049,937776.1383,270000,18746.33525,46888.80692,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1377,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,5502900,,,9337422.937,9337422.937,5502900,9337422.937,9337422.937,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct costs from leafy spurge infestations on grazing land,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1379,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,riparian,9,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,5637000,,,9791164.58,9022708.967,5637000,9791164.58,9022708.967,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Riparian cost for GB from Table 4.3, pp41. Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1380,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Arundo,Arundo donax,,Giant reed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Albany thicket biome,1,N,Africa,South Africa,,Albany Thicket Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2009,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,5700000,,,785523.9479,1590993.08,380000,52368.26319,106066.2053,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1381,,Rempel2010,Economic impact assessment of leafy spurge in Southern Manitoba,Rempel K,[contains a lengthy executive summary],2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,roadsides,12,N,North America,Canada,Manitoba,,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,5885968,,,5891207.462,5598073.687,5885968,5891207.462,5598073.687,CAD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""chemical applications specifically for leafy spurge on roadsides""",Marina Golivets,
SC1383,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Bignoniaceae,Tecoma,Tecoma stans,,Yellow elder,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,5940000,,,412419.3754,1031553.752,297000,20620.96877,51577.68761,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1389,,Doeleman1989,Biological Control of Salvinia molesta in Sri Lanka. An Assessment of Costs and Benefits,"Doeleman, J.A.","In the mid 1980s the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) committed itself to a program of biological control of the aquatic weed Salvinia molesto in SriLanka. Salvinia in Sri Lanka interferes with irrigation and drainage of rice paddies, it reducesthe fish catch in water reservoirs and it also poses a health risk in providing additional breeding opportunities for mosquitos. The agent of biological control is a Brazilian weevil called Cyrtobagous solvinioe. Spectacular results with this beetle have already been achieved in Australia, Papua New Guinea and other countries following entomological work during the 1970s in whichthe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) played a pioneering role.This study estimates the economic benefits from the Sri Lankan program. A feasible rangeof net present values were determined over a forward-looking 25-year time horizon. At the midpointof the likely feasible range, the present value of salvinia control is A$16 million (433 million rupees) at 1987 prices. Considering both the Australian and Sri Lankan contribution to theprogram, the estimate represents a return of A$53 (or rupees) per dollar (or rupee) invested. When the same calculation is cast in terms of the value of Sri Lankan labour the ratio is boosted from 53 to a dramatic 1673.The research demonstrates: (a) an effective case of foreign aid; (b) the value of biological controlmethods; and (c) the role of publicly funded research in biological control.",1989,English,Official report,McConnachie2003,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Salvinia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,reservoirs and drainage systems,11,N,Asia,Sri Lanka,,,Country,1987-2011,Period,1987,2011,1987,2011,Potentially ongoing,6100000,4100000,8200000,446916.1792,,244000,17876.64717,,LKR,1987,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,fishery losses,Jane Catford,
SC1390,WoS,Bekele2018,Economic impacts of Prosopis spp. invasions on dryland ecosystem services in Ethiopia and Kenya: Evidence from choice experimental data,Bekele et al.,"Biological invasions can induce trajectories of changes that make ecosystems fragile and less reliable in providing services and goods. Here we set out to assess the economic value of dry land ecosystem services affected by the invasive tree Prosopis, which was originally introduced in Africa and elsewhere for providing firewood, animal fodder and other services to rural people. Based on choice experiment method, we estimated the economic values of dry land ecosystem services affected by Prosopis in the heavily invaded Afar region, Ethiopia and Baringo County, Kenya. Including labor and cash contributions as payment attributes, a random parameters logit model was employed for analyzing households' preferences for the affected ecosystem services. We found that, despite the services provided by Prosopis, households from both regions were willing to pay for its management primarily driven by biodiversity and water. WTP was on average higher in Afar (USD 50.42/year) than in Baringo (USD 37.74/year), which may be because the ecosystems in Afar were less degraded prior to the invasion by Prosopis than in Baringo and that charcoal production in Afar is officially prohibited. Our results indicate that the costs imposed by the deliberately introduced Prosopis outweigh its benefits in both Afar and Baringo.",2018,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Prosopis,Prosopis juliflora,,Prosopis,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Main vegetation types in the study area  comprise bush land, shrub land, riverine forests, grasslands and seasonal marshes and swamps",3\4\9\10,N,Africa,Ethiopia,,Afar Region,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,6100000,,,5954555.033,16379687.69,6100000,5954555.033,16379687.69,USD,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,"The cost estimate is based on willingness to pay economic valuation method. The cost represents social costs if the invasion continues or social benefit if the invasion is managed. Hence, the same cost is specified under cost estimate and benefit values.",Justice Tambo,
SC1392,GS,,"Economic appraisal of the public control and prevention strategy against the 2010 West Nile Virus outbreak in Central Macedonia, Greece","A. Kolimenakis, K. Bithas, C. Richardson, D. Latinopoulos, A. Baka, A. Vakali, C. Hadjichristodoulou, S. Mourelatos, S. Kalaitzopoulou, S. Gewehr, A. Michaelakis, G. Koliopoulous","Objectives
The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the economic efficiency of the public control and prevention strategies to tackle the 2010 West Nile Virus (WNV) outbreak in the Region of Central Macedonia, Greece. Efficiency is examined on the basis of the public prevention costs incurred and their potential in justifying the costs arising from health and nuisance impacts in the succeeding years.

Study design
Economic appraisal of public health management interventions.

Methods
Prevention and control cost categories including control programmes, contingency planning and blood safety testing, are analyzed based on market prices. A separate cost of illness approach is conducted for the estimation of medical costs and productivity losses from 2010 to 2013 and for the calculation of averted health impacts. The averted mosquito nuisance costs to households are estimated on the basis of a contingent valuation study. Based on these findings, a limited cost-benefit analysis is employed in order to evaluate the economic efficiency of these strategies in 2010–2013.

Results
Results indicate that cost of illness and prevention costs fell significantly in the years following the 2010 outbreak, also as a result of the epidemic coming under control. According to the contingent valuation survey, the annual average willingness to pay to eliminate the mosquito problem in the study area ranged between 22 and 27 € per household. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that the aggregate benefit of implementing the previous 3-year strategy creates a net socio-economic benefit in 2013. However the spread of the WNV epidemic and the overall socio-economic consequences, had the various costs not been employed, remain unpredictable and extremely difficult to calculate.

Conclusions
The application of a post epidemic strategy appears to be of utmost importance for public health safety. An updated well designed survey is needed for a more precise definition of the optimum prevention policies and levels and for the establishment of the various cost/benefit parameters.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,Asian tiger mosquito,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Greece,Macedonia,Region Of Central Macedonia,Site,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,One-time,6300000,,,9388630.128,9808302.809,6300000,9388630.128,9808302.809,EUR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Prevention,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Melina Kouranditou,No
SC1393,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,6375800,,,10818575.87,10818575.87,6375800,10818575.87,10818575.87,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct costs from leafy spurge infestations on grazing land,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1394,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,New Brunswick,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1986,Year,1986,1986,1986,1986,One-time,6397059,NA,NA,10285718.82,9674339.689,6397059,10285718.82,9674339.689,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1396,,Nealis2002,"Gypsy moth in Canada: case study of an invasive insect. Pages 151-159 in Claudi et al. (2002) Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests",Nealis V.G.,"[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) is a native insect of Eurasia where it feeds on the leaves of broadleaf trees, especially oaks (Quercus spp.). Populations of gypsy moth increase periodically to very high local densities and severely defoliate preferred host trees (Elkinton and Liebhold 1990). In its native range, gypsy moth displays highly variable biological characteristics. The most significant life-history variations relevant to invasiveness are the geographic differences in flight capability of adult females and host food range of the larvae. Female moths from western (European) populations are flightless, while those from eastern (Asian) populations are capable of strong, directed flight. Gypsy moth larvae feed on a wide variety of mostly broadleaf tree hosts throughout their geographic range, but Asian populations also feed on coniferous tree species and therefore are of even greater concern to Canada than the European populations.
A European strain of the gypsy moth escaped from a laboratory near Boston, MA, in 1869. Since then, gypsy moth has spread and become established in the temperate forests of eastern North America, approximately between latitudes 36° and 47°N, and from the Atlantic coast to the Great Lakes basin as far as 90°W. During this same period, there have been repeated interceptions of both European and Asian strains of gypsy moth in western North America but, as yet (2000), neither strain is regarded as established there.
The North American experience with gypsy moth is an instructive case study of an invasive spe cies. There has been a well-documented public and scientific response to the problems caused by gypsy moth that can serve as a historical lesson for managing local and national environments in the global village. Scientific information on gypsy moth is probably as thorough as that on any invasive forest insect. Public policy on managing gypsy moth has ranged from neglect to aggressive mitigative action at considerable public cost and sometimes with dire environmental conse quences.
We can compare actions in the United States and Canada from distinct historical and legislative perspectives. As a case study in Canada, we can examine the impacts of establishment and spread of this alien species in eastern Canada and analyze the feasibility and benefits of maintaining gypsy moth-free regions by coordinating national and regional management activities. Discussion here emphasizes history and status of the European strain of gypsy moth now widely established in eastern North America and threatening to extend its range. Regulatory agencies now refer to this European strain as the North American gypsy moth, although it remains an alien species. Issues discussed here, however, pertain equally to the Asian strain of gypsy moth.
Attributes of an Invader
The gypsy moth has several biological and ecological attributes that favor its success as an invasive
species. Gypsy moth has a broad native geographic range that presents many potential sources of introduction. Also, the insect tolerates a wide range of climatic conditions and feeds on many different tree species. Thus gypsy moth has a high probability of persistence in temperate forests worldwide. The reproductive biology of gypsy moth also favors colonization. Adult females may produce more than 1000 offspring in a single egg mass, so even one female can contribute a sizable founding population.
The greatest limitation of gypsy moth as an invasive species is that it is a poor disperser over long distances. The female adult moth of the European strain is flightless. Natural dispersal is restricted to relatively short distance ballooning of newly hatched larvae (Elkinton and Liebhold 1990), making gypsy moth’s surreptitious association with humans significant. Many of the host plants that gypsy moth favors flourish in habitats associated with human settlement. Further, gypsy moths frequently leave their host plants to lay eggs in sheltered locations and these are often structures associated with humans, such as firewood and outdoor household goods. When these goods are moved, the gypsy moth moves with them. Thus, although some spread of gypsy moth along the margins of its range in North America can be accounted for by natural dispersal of small larvae, inadvertent movement of egg masses, by a mobile human population, is the source of most new infestations in areas remote from the established populations, particularly those in western North America.

",2002,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,Canada,British Columbia,Vancouver,Unit (city),1992,Year,1992,1992,1992,1992,One-time,6500000,NA,NA,5640610.121,7205282.608,6500000,5640610.121,7205282.608,CAD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp154 ""The cost of eradicating Asian and European gypsy moth from nearly 19 000 ha in Van couver in 1992, for example, was Can$6.5 million."" Reflects ""operational costs for the local spray and public relations programs only. The cost of research and monitoring including salaries are extra and difficult to obtain reliably from the accounting methods used.""",Nigel Taylor,
SC1401,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,6700000,,,10677192.54,10653784.07,609090.9091,970653.8676,968525.8247,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
SC1403,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Albany thicket biome,1,N,Africa,South Africa,,Albany Thicket Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,6700000,,,923335.1668,1870114.673,446666.6667,61555.67779,124674.3115,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1405,,FLDEP2007,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2006 - 2007,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,"This report was prepared in accordance with §369.22 (7), Florida Statutes, to provide an annual assessment of the control achieved and funding necessary to manage nonindigenous aquatic plants in intercounty waters. The authority of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) as addressed in §369.20 (5), Florida Statutes, extends to the management of nuisance populations of all aquatic plants, both indigenous and nonindigenous, and in all waters accessible to the general public. The aquatic plant management program in Florida’s public waters involves complex operational and financial interactions between state, federal and local governments as well as private sector companies. A summary of plant acres controlled in sovereignty public waters and associated expenditures contracted or monitored by the DEP during Fiscal Year 2006-2007 is presented in the tables on page 42 of this report. Florida’s aquatic plant management program mission is to reduce negative impacts from invasive nonindigenous plants like water hyacinth, water lettuce and hydrilla to conserve the multiple uses and functions of public lakes and rivers. Invasive plants infest 95 percent of the 437 public waters inventoried in 2007 that comprise 1.25 million acres of fresh water where fishing alone is valued at more than $1.5 billion annually. Once established, eradicating invasive plants is difficult or impossible and very expensive; therefore, continuous maintenance is critical to sustaining navigation, flood control and recreation while conserving native plant habitat on sovereignty state lands at the lowest feasible cost. The floating, non-native water hyacinth and water lettuce are two of the world’s fastest growing plants. These invasive plants, that once covered more than 125,000 acres of Florida’s public waters, are the DEP’s highest management priority. Floating plants covered a combined 3,342 acres in the 247 waters in which they were detected during 2007 - a 2,200-acre reduction from 2006 and an 11,000-acre reduction since 2005. About $3.5 million were spent controlling nearly 21,900 acres of floating plants in FY 06-07. Ninety-eight percent of Florida’s public waters are under maintenance control in regards to invasive floating plants. Efforts are underway to bring remaining systems like Lake Monroe, Shell Reservoir and the St. Johns, Hillsborough and Withlacoochee Rivers under control. Hydrilla, a submersed invasive species introduced from Southeast Asia in the 1950s, dispersed throughout the state impacting nearly 140,000 acres by the early 1990s. Dense mats form at the water surface blocking navigation, jamming against bridges, starving fish of oxygen and hampering flood control. Increased control efforts from improved, recurring funds since 2000, along with wave action and increased turbidity from three hurricanes in 2004, reduced the hydrilla standing crop to 20,400 in 2005. However, underground tubers that can sprout and blanket waters within one year still infest an estimated 81,400 acres. Hydrilla, which has been recorded in as many as 346 public water bodies during the previous 24 years, was detected in 199 waters in 2007. Hydrilla cover increased to about 45,400 acres in 2007. It is considered to be under maintenance control in 96 percent of Florida’s public waters. However, hydrilla is continuing a rapid recovery from the post hurricane year low, expanding in some of Florida’s largest and most important lakes including Toho, Orange, Lochloosa and Rousseau. Approximately $6.8 million were spent managing 13,569 acres of hydrilla in public waters in FY 06-07. This low effort of control is more reflective of the lack of costeffective, large-scale management tools available since the confirmation of increasing resistance to fluridone herbicide in hydrilla. Intense research and operational efforts during the past six years have lead to the development of new strategies that will be employed in an expanded level of hydrilla management in FY 07-08. Nine additional invasive plants collectively infest 88 percent of Florida’s public waters covering about 19,000 acres. More than $5.8 million were spent managing other plants in FY 06-07, including invasive exotics as well as native plants that interfered with uses and functions of Florida public waters. Approximately $29.7 million are needed for FY 08-09 to manage invasive exotic aquatic plants; $18 million to sustain current control levels and improve upon hydrilla maintenance strategies; $3.5 million to control floating plants; and $8.2 million to manage other invasive plants, especially torpedograss, in Florida public waters",2007,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Hydrilla,Hydrilla verticillata,,hydrilla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,6809970,,,8050726.116,8050726.116,6809970,8050726.116,8050726.116,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1406,TC,Salaudeen2013,Economic Impact of Tropical Soda Apple (Solanum viarum) on Florida Cattle Production,Salaudeen  T  Thomas  M  Harding  D  Hight  SD,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum viarum,,tropical soda apple,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2006,Year,1993,Unspecified,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,6881600,,,8367483.401,8367483.401,6881600,8367483.401,8367483.401,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Estimated directly from control costs,Andrew Kramer,
SC1407,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1990,Unspecified,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,6900000,,,12944640.28,12944640.28,6900000,12944640.28,12944640.28,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,These costs are not included in the overall cost for the region (see Table 4),Marina Golivets,
SC1410,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Albania,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,7000000,,,10617841.6,173926.0326,7000000,10617841.6,173926.0326,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1412,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum seaforthianum,,Bugweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,7100000,,,492959.1861,1233001.96,355000,24647.95931,61650.09798,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1413,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Romania,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,7200000,,,10921208.5,5061793.602,7200000,10921208.5,5061793.602,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1416,,7477,Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing: A case study from South Africa,"McConnachie, M. M., Cowling, R. M. van Wilgen, B. W.  McConnachie, D. A.","Conservation projects spend billions of dollars clearing invasive alien plants, yet few studies have measured the cost-effectiveness of doing this, especially over larger spatial and temporal scales, relevant to operational contexts. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of South Africa’s national invasive alien plant control programme, Working for Water, in reducing invasive alien plant cover in the Krom and Kouga river catchments over 7 years. We assessed change in invasive alien plant cover by comparing post-treatment cover with the first recorded pre-treatment cover across all 740 of the two project’s treatment sites (ranging from 0.03 to 227.6 ha in size). We also used regression analysis to estimate the effect of predictor variables on the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing. We found – by dividing the total costs by the change in invasive alien plant cover – that it cost 2.4 times more (1.5 times for the Krom, and 8.6 times for the Kouga project) to clear invaded land than the highest equivalent estimate made elsewhere. At current rates of clearing, it would take 54 and 695 years to clear the catchments, in the Krom and Kouga, respectively, assuming no further spread. If spread is considered, current control efforts are inadequate, and invasions are likely to continue to spread in the catchments. Pre-treatment invasive alien plant cover and treatment costs per hectare had the greatest positive and negative influence, respectively on cost-effectiveness. Our assessment suggests that invasive alien plant control projects urgently need to monitor their cost-effectiveness so that management practices can be adapted to use scarce conservation funds more effectively.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Kouga River Catchment,Unit (2426 km2),6 years (2002-2008),Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,7350000,,,1128534.213,1806025.959,1050000,161219.1732,258003.7084,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Operational costs,Desika Moodley,
SC1418,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Rooikrans,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Albany thicket biome,1,N,Africa,South Africa,,Albany Thicket Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2009,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,7500000,,,1033584.142,2093411.947,500000,68905.60946,139560.7965,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1419,,Panetta2009,Weed eradication - an economic perspective,"Panetta, FD","There has been recent interest in determining the upper limits to the feasibility of weed eradication. Although a number of disparate factors determine the success of an eradication program, ultimately eradication feasibility must be viewed in the context of the amount of investment that can be made. The latter should reflect the hazard posed by an invasion, with greater investment justified by greater threats. In simplest terms, the effort (and hence investment) to achieve weed eradication comprises the detection effort required to delimit an invasion plus the search and control effort required to prevent reproduction until extirpation occurs over the entire infested area. The difficulty of estimating the required investment at the commencement of a weed eradication program (as well as during periodic reviews) is a serious problem. Bioeconomics show promise in determining the optimal approach to managing weed invasions, notwithstanding ongoing difficulties in estimating the costs and benefits of eradication and alternative invasion management strategies. A flexible approach to the management of weed invasions is needed, allowing for the adoption of another strategy when it becomes clear that the probability of eradication is low, owing to resourcing or intractable technical issues. Whether the considerable progress that has been achieved towards eradication of the once massive witchweed invasion can be duplicated for other weeds of agricultural systems will depend to a large extent upon investment (. $250 million over 50 yr in this instance). Weeds of natural ecosystems seem destined to remain more difficult eradication targets for a variety of reasons, including higher impedance to eradication, more difficulty in valuing the benefits arising from eradication, and possibly less willingness to pay from society at large.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Caulerpaceae,Caulerpa,Caulerpa taxifolia,,Caulerpa,Aquatic,aquatic,N,aquatic,11,N,North America,USA,California,California,Unit (1.276 ha),6 years,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2004,2009,One-time,7630000,,,8686673.034,8686673.034,1271666.667,1447778.839,1447778.839,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs of a successful weed eradication, used gross area (area treated + area searched); table cites Anderson 2005 & Anderson 2007 (note Anderson 2005 is already in the database, but has a different cost!!)",Jennifer Bufford,
SC1420,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Malawi,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,7700000,,,7516405.534,25305688.83,7700000,7516405.534,25305688.83,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1421,,7477,Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing: A case study from South Africa,"McConnachie, M. M., Cowling, R. M. van Wilgen, B. W.  McConnachie, D. A.","Conservation projects spend billions of dollars clearing invasive alien plants, yet few studies have measured the cost-effectiveness of doing this, especially over larger spatial and temporal scales, relevant to operational contexts. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of South Africa’s national invasive alien plant control programme, Working for Water, in reducing invasive alien plant cover in the Krom and Kouga river catchments over 7 years. We assessed change in invasive alien plant cover by comparing post-treatment cover with the first recorded pre-treatment cover across all 740 of the two project’s treatment sites (ranging from 0.03 to 227.6 ha in size). We also used regression analysis to estimate the effect of predictor variables on the cost-effectiveness of invasive alien plant clearing. We found – by dividing the total costs by the change in invasive alien plant cover – that it cost 2.4 times more (1.5 times for the Krom, and 8.6 times for the Kouga project) to clear invaded land than the highest equivalent estimate made elsewhere. At current rates of clearing, it would take 54 and 695 years to clear the catchments, in the Krom and Kouga, respectively, assuming no further spread. If spread is considered, current control efforts are inadequate, and invasions are likely to continue to spread in the catchments. Pre-treatment invasive alien plant cover and treatment costs per hectare had the greatest positive and negative influence, respectively on cost-effectiveness. Our assessment suggests that invasive alien plant control projects urgently need to monitor their cost-effectiveness so that management practices can be adapted to use scarce conservation funds more effectively.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Krom River Catchment,Unit (1556 km2),6 years (2002-2008),Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,7750000,,,1189951.041,1904313.086,1107142.857,169993.0058,272044.7265,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Operational costs,Desika Moodley,
SC1426,,Buddenhagen2015,Lessons from successful plant eradications in Galapagos: commitment is crucial,"Buddenhagen, C.E. and Tye, A.","We analyse introduced plant eradication projects in Galapagos. 8 (38 %) of 21 initiated projects have succeeded. Evaluation of project progress, feasibility and costs suggests that for\US$100,000 (2015 prices) another 12 projects could achieve eradication within 5 years. This contrasts with the analysis of the same programme by Gardener et al. (Restor Ecol 18:20–29, 2010), which concluded that 87 % of projects failed. The difference arises because Gardener et al. (2010) wrongly included 15 plant populations which either had not been completely evaluated, or had been evaluated as potential eradication targets but excluded as not feasible with available resources (i.e. they were not eradication projects), while they omitted six further projects, of which two had already achieved eradication. Of the projects which they labelled as ‘‘failed’’, two have also since achieved eradication, while five others are still in progress with eradication as their stated objective. They also abandoned six high-feasibility projects that were showing promising results. They placed the programme in the context of the ‘‘novel ecosystem’’ paradigm, which views much ecosystem restoration as futile, especially invasive species management. However, the Galapagos programme was designed to address small populations of incipient invasives, where eradication is more a tool to prevent the future impacts of new invaders than a tool for restoration. We show that eradication of plants in this context is achievable when a simple prior feasibility assessment is made.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rubiales,Rubiaceae,Cinchona,Cinchona pubescens,,quinine,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,"Santa
Cruz",Unit (Island),2010,Period,1983,2011,1983,2011,Potentially ongoing,8000000,,,9457576.015,22045454.43,275862.069,326123.3108,760188.0839,USD,2007,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"This study attempted to assess the progress with invasive plant eradications in Galapagos. For this species, the outcome in a previous study was initally ""failed eradication attempt"" but in this paper the popualtion status was considered ""Research only; evaluated as high
cost for eradication and not to be
undertaken unless adequate finance obtained. Control
continues"". ""To facilitate comparisons, we discuss project costs using the same 2007 prices""",Desika Moodley,
SC1428,,,Biological control of gorse: an ex-ante evaluation,Sandrey RA,,1985,English,Official report,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,gorse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4b\12b,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1984-5,Year,1984,1984,1984,1984,Potentially ongoing,8000000,,,10701025.18,17895887.22,8000000,10701025.18,17895887.22,NZD,1984,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,namechecks an unobtainable Monsanto (1984) report for alternative (& reportedly deficient) estimate of 150 million. Benefits to beekeepers,,
SC1433,TC,Salaudeen2013,Economic Impact of Tropical Soda Apple (Solanum viarum) on Florida Cattle Production,Salaudeen  T  Thomas  M  Harding  D  Hight  SD,,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum viarum,,tropical soda apple,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2006,Year,1993,Unspecified,1993,1993,Potentially ongoing,8112300,,,9863917.635,9863917.635,8112300,9863917.635,9863917.635,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Survey,Andrew Kramer,
SC1434,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Agavaceae,Agave,Agave sisalana,,Sisal,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,8120000,,,563778.6748,1410137.452,406000,28188.93374,70506.87262,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1435,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Serbia,Kosovo,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,8200000,,,12438043.02,27331318.41,8200000,12438043.02,27331318.41,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1437,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,New Brunswick,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1988,Year,1988,1988,1988,1988,One-time,8203829,NA,NA,13190792.57,12406736.99,8203829,13190792.57,12406736.99,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1439,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,New Brunswick,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1987,Year,1987,1987,1987,1987,One-time,8357698,NA,NA,13438195.84,12639434.69,8357698,13438195.84,12639434.69,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1443,,FLDEP2006,Status of the Aquatic Plant Maintenance Program in Florida Public Waters Annual Report Fiscal Year 2005-2006,Florida Department of Environmental Protection,"Florida’s aquatic plant management program mission is to reduce negative impacts from invasive non-indigenous plants like water hyacinth, water lettuce, and hydrilla, as well as nuisance native plants, including floating islands that jeopardize navigation, bridges, and flood control structures. Invasive plants infest 96% of the 445 public lakes and rivers inventoried in 2006 that comprise 1.26 million acres of fresh water where fishing alone is valued at over $1.5 billion annually. Once established, eradicating invasive plants is difficult or impossible and very expensive; therefore, continuous maintenance is critical to sustaining navigation, flood control, and recreation while conserving native plant habitat on sovereignty state lands, at the lowest feasible cost. The floating, non-native water hyacinth and water lettuce are two of the world’s fastest growing plants. These invasive plants, that once covered more than 125,000 acres of Florida’s public waters, are the BIPM’s highest management priority. Floating plants covered 5,580 acres in the 276 waters in which they were detected during 2006; an 8,800- acre reduction from 2005. 99% of Florida’s public waters are under maintenance control in regards to invasive floating plants. About $3.6 million were spent controlling nearly 37,100 acres of floating plants in FY 05-06. 81% of the floating plant coverage was in Lake Okeechobee and the St Johns and Kissimmee Rivers and their tributaries. Intensive management efforts are underway to bring these systems under control. Hydrilla, a submersed invasive species introduced from Southeast Asia in the 1950s, dispersed throughout the state impacting nearly 140,000 acres by the early 1990s. Dense mats form at the water surface blocking navigation, jamming against bridges, starving fish of oxygen, and hampering flood control. Increased control efforts from improved, recurring funds under the Florida Forever Act, along with wave action and increased turbidity from three hurricanes in 2004 reduced the hydrilla standing crop to 20,409 in 2005 - the lowest level since the BIPM began conducting inventories in 1983. However, underground tubers that can sprout and blanket waters within one year, still infest an estimated 91,000 acres. Hydrilla, which has been recorded in as many as 346 public water bodies during the previous 23 years, was detected in 202 waters in 2006. Hydrilla cover increased to about 31,800 acres in 2006; however, hydrilla is considered to be under maintenance control in 96% of Florida’s public waters. Approximately $8.5 million were spent managing 17,800 acres of hydrilla in public waters in FY 05-06. These figures represent an increase of about 20% in the acres controlled and 15% in control expenditures over the previous year reflecting the recovery from 2004 hurricane-related disturbances. As water levels dropped and water clarity improved, hydrilla began to recover, requiring increasing statewide maintenance efforts. Nine additional invasive plants collectively infest 85% of Florida’s public waters covering about 18,200 acres. More than $9.1 million were spent managing other plants in FY 05-06, including invasive exotics as well as rooted native plants that interfered with uses and functions of Florida public waters. Floating islands generated from increased water levels and hurricanes in the early 2000s created problems with navigation, flood control, recreation, habitat and even human safety. $8.6 million were spent controlling floating islands in both FY 04-05 and FY 05-06. This intensive management combined with receding water levels in the latter half of 2006 have substantially reduced floating island-related problems as well as the funding required to manage them. Approximately $29.0 million are needed for FY 07-08 to manage invasive exotic aquatic plants and floating islands; $16 million to sustain control and improve upon hydrilla maintenance strategies; $3.5 million to control floating plants; and $9.5 million to manage other invasive plants including drifting, floating islands in Florida public waters.",2006,English,Official report,Adams2011,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Hydrilla,Hydrilla verticillata,,hydrilla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,8500946,,,10336480.55,10336480.55,8500946,10336480.55,10336480.55,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Management,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1444,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,New Brunswick,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1985,Year,1985,1985,1985,1985,One-time,8536590,NA,NA,13725833.14,12909974.95,8536590,13725833.14,12909974.95,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1448,,Thompson1990b,Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge on North Dakota Grazing Land,Thompson,,1990,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland (grazing land),4,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,8600000,,,17004800.35,17004800.35,8600000,17004800.35,17004800.35,USD,1989,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Statewide, the present leafy spurge infestation is estimated to cause a reduction of 577,000 AUMs, valued at $8.6 million to the ranch operator, other things being equal (Table 4).""",Marina Golivets,
SC1449,,Leistritz1992,Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) in North Dakota,Leistritz et al,,1992,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,8600000,,,17004800.35,17004800.35,8600000,17004800.35,17004800.35,USD,1989,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""estimated $8.6 million in reduced net income to landowners and ranchers""/""reduced ranchers annual net income""; Corrections MG: effective year changed to the publication year of the original publication; Corrections MG: sector changed from Agriculture to Public and social welfare; Corrections MG: start and end year changed from Unspecified to 1989; Corrections MG: recalculated cost using data from table 3",Ivan Jaric/Marina Golivets,Yes
SC1450,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,rhododendron,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,1\2,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,8621454,,,14975000.01,13799693.16,8621454,14975000.01,13799693.16,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp93. Probably 1/3 cost in each of England, Scotland and Wales.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1452,,Doeleman1989,Biological Control of Salvinia molesta in Sri Lanka. An Assessment of Costs and Benefits,"Doeleman, J.A.","In the mid 1980s the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) committed itself to a program of biological control of the aquatic weed Salvinia molesto in SriLanka. Salvinia in Sri Lanka interferes with irrigation and drainage of rice paddies, it reducesthe fish catch in water reservoirs and it also poses a health risk in providing additional breeding opportunities for mosquitos. The agent of biological control is a Brazilian weevil called Cyrtobagous solvinioe. Spectacular results with this beetle have already been achieved in Australia, Papua New Guinea and other countries following entomological work during the 1970s in whichthe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) played a pioneering role.This study estimates the economic benefits from the Sri Lankan program. A feasible rangeof net present values were determined over a forward-looking 25-year time horizon. At the midpointof the likely feasible range, the present value of salvinia control is A$16 million (433 million rupees) at 1987 prices. Considering both the Australian and Sri Lankan contribution to theprogram, the estimate represents a return of A$53 (or rupees) per dollar (or rupee) invested. When the same calculation is cast in terms of the value of Sri Lankan labour the ratio is boosted from 53 to a dramatic 1673.The research demonstrates: (a) an effective case of foreign aid; (b) the value of biological controlmethods; and (c) the role of publicly funded research in biological control.",1989,English,Official report,McConnachie2003,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Salvinia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,reservoirs and drainage systems,11,N,Asia,Sri Lanka,,,Country,1987-2011,Period,1987,2011,1987,2011,Potentially ongoing,8700000,5800000,11600000,637405.0424,,348000,25496.2017,,LKR,1987,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,yes,health,Jane Catford,
SC1453,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Salicaceae,Salix,Salix babylonica,,Babylon willow/Weeping willow,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Grassland biome (excluding arid areas),4,N,Africa,South Africa,,Grassland Biome (excluding Arid Areas),Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,8700000,,,1198957.605,2428357.858,580000,79930.50698,161890.5239,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1454,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Tomato farmers across Zambia's agro-ecological zones (i.e., 1, 2a, 2b and 3)",12b,N,Africa,Zambia,,Seven Provinces (Unspecified),Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,8700000,,,8492562.097,23294977.93,8700000,8492562.097,23294977.93,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production,Justice Tambo,
SC1457,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,8753000,,,16420932.81,16420932.81,8753000,16420932.81,16420932.81,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""… estimated using the North Dakota Input-Output Model (Coon et al. 1985)""",Marina Golivets,
SC1459,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Italy,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,8900000,,,13499827.18,12783220.85,8900000,13499827.18,12783220.85,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1460,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,9000000,,,13651510.63,13733422.08,9000000,13651510.63,13733422.08,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1467,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Austria,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,9400000,,,14258244.43,12320954.19,9400000,14258244.43,12320954.19,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1468,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1983,Year,1983,1983,1983,1983,One-time,9417854,NA,NA,15142802.05,14242719.78,9417854,15142802.05,14242719.78,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1471,,Doeleman1989,Biological Control of Salvinia molesta in Sri Lanka. An Assessment of Costs and Benefits,"Doeleman, J.A.","In the mid 1980s the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) committed itself to a program of biological control of the aquatic weed Salvinia molesto in SriLanka. Salvinia in Sri Lanka interferes with irrigation and drainage of rice paddies, it reducesthe fish catch in water reservoirs and it also poses a health risk in providing additional breeding opportunities for mosquitos. The agent of biological control is a Brazilian weevil called Cyrtobagous solvinioe. Spectacular results with this beetle have already been achieved in Australia, Papua New Guinea and other countries following entomological work during the 1970s in whichthe Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) played a pioneering role.This study estimates the economic benefits from the Sri Lankan program. A feasible rangeof net present values were determined over a forward-looking 25-year time horizon. At the midpointof the likely feasible range, the present value of salvinia control is A$16 million (433 million rupees) at 1987 prices. Considering both the Australian and Sri Lankan contribution to theprogram, the estimate represents a return of A$53 (or rupees) per dollar (or rupee) invested. When the same calculation is cast in terms of the value of Sri Lankan labour the ratio is boosted from 53 to a dramatic 1673.The research demonstrates: (a) an effective case of foreign aid; (b) the value of biological controlmethods; and (c) the role of publicly funded research in biological control.",1989,English,Official report,McConnachie2003,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Polypodiopsida,Salviniales,Salviniaceae,Salvinia,Salvinia molesta,,Salvinia,Aquatic,aquatic,N,reservoirs and drainage systems,11,N,Asia,Sri Lanka,,,Country,1987-2011,Period,1987,2011,1987,2011,Potentially ongoing,9500000,5400000,13500000,696017.0004,,380000,27840.68001,,LKR,1987,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,costs of current control measures (mechanical),Jane Catford,
SC1475,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1982,Year,1982,1982,1982,1982,One-time,9622710,NA,NA,15472186.42,14552525.66,9622710,15472186.42,14552525.66,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1477,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1984,Year,1984,1984,1984,1984,One-time,9686052,NA,NA,15574032.91,14648318.44,9686052,15574032.91,14648318.44,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1481,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia melanoxylon,,Australian blackwood,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forest biome,1,N,Africa,South Africa,,Forest Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,9900000,,,1364331.067,2763303.77,660000,90955.40449,184220.2513,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1483,,Senator&Rozenberg2016,Assessment of economic and environmental impact of invasive plant species,"Senator, SA, and AG Rozenberg","This article presents data from a review of published works on the economic damage caused by invasive plant species, their ecological and economical impact, and the legal regulation of biological invasions.
It is concluded that it is necessary to elaborate and adopt a national strategy on alien species, federal regulatory acts concerning the policy on invasive organisms, and general approaches and criteria to evaluate the risk of their spread. Effective control of invasive species is only possible at the rational approach, which takes into consideration individual ecological-biological features of the species, their relations with other components of the community, the properties of the ecosystem invaded by them, expenditures for their control, and the period and consequences of their eradication.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,city,12,N,Asia,China,,Wenzhou,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,1672495.934,3645358.206,10000000,1672495.934,3645358.206,RMB,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Ana Novoa,
SC1484,,Center1997,Biological control,Center et al.,,1997,English,Book chapter,Pimentel2000,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Hydrilla,Hydrilla verticillata,,hydrilla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Florida,Florida,Unit (2 lakes),2000,Year,1997,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,14234586.72,14234586.72,10000000,14234586.72,14234586.72,USD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1485,GS,Kovacs2011,Predicting the economic costs and property value losses attributed to sudden oak death damage in California (2010-2020),"Kovacs, K; Vaclavik, T; Haight, RG; Pang, A; Cunniffe, NJ; Gilligan, CA; Meentemeyer, RK","Phytophthora ramorum, cause of sudden oak death, is a quarantined, non-native, invasive forest pathogen
resulting in substantial mortality in coastal live oak (Quercus agrifolia) and several other related tree
species on the Pacific Coast of the United States. We estimate the discounted cost of oak treatment,
removal, and replacement on developed land in California communities using simulations of P. ramorum
spread and infection risk over the next decade (2010e2020). An estimated 734 thousand oak trees occur
on developed land in communities in the analysis area. The simulations predict an expanding sudden oak
death (SOD) infestation that will likely encompass most of northwestern California and warrant treatment,
removal, and replacement of more than 10 thousand oak trees with discounted cost of $7.5 million.
In addition, we estimate the discounted property losses to single family homes of $135 million.
Expanding the land base to include developed land outside as well as inside communities doubles the
estimates of the number of oak trees killed and the associated costs and losses. The predicted costs and
property value losses are substantial, but many of the damages in urban areas (e.g. potential losses from
increased fire and safety risks of the dead trees and the loss of ecosystem service values) are not
included.",2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,"S. Frankel, personal communication, 2009",Yes,Chromista,Oomycota,Oomycetes,Peronosporales,Peronosporaceae,Phytophthora,Phytophthora ramorum,,Sudden Oak Death,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,USA,Florida,U.S.,Country,2008,Year,2008,2008,2008,2008,One-time,10000000,,,11384892.57,11384892.57,10000000,11384892.57,11384892.57,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Detection/Education/Outreach/Regulation/Research,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,,no,"In 2008,
state and federal governments spent about $10 million on regulatory,
survey and detection, outreach and education, method and
research investment on SOD",Melina Kouranditou,
SC1489,,Rempel2010,Economic impact assessment of leafy spurge in Southern Manitoba,Rempel K,[contains a lengthy executive summary],2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,Canada,Manitoba,,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,10214580,,,10223672.63,9714964.731,10214580,10223672.63,9714964.731,CAD,2009,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""direct costs based on the value of lost grazing capacity of pastures for livestock production""",Marina Golivets,
SC1495,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,New Brunswick,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1984,Year,1984,1984,1984,1984,One-time,10923678,NA,NA,17563990.02,16519993.27,10923678,17563990.02,16519993.27,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1496,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Poland,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,11000000,,,16685179.66,6654105.29,11000000,16685179.66,6654105.29,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1499,,Wallace1992,Economic impact of leafy spurge on North Dakota wildland,Wallace et al,,1992,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"wildland (i.e. land not used for industrial, urban, or agricultural purposes and included forests, recreation areas, and wilderness)",NA,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,11017000,,,19828543.96,19828543.96,11017000,19828543.96,19828543.96,USD,1991,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Total direct and secondary costs of leafy spurge; estimated using the North Dakota 18-sector Input-Output Model (Coon et al 1990); The Model traces linkages among business sectors and calculates additions or reductions (secondary economic impacts) in total business activity, as well as estimating the number of jobs gained or lost; wildland area 4899000 acres of which 467996 are invaded by leafy spurge",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1503,TC,Observatoire2012,Troisième rapport sur l'ambroisie en Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,Observatoire Régional de la Santé Rhône-Alpes,"[First page of text] 1. CONTEXTE ET OBJECTIFS DE L’ETUDE
L'ambroisie (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) est une plante invasive annuelle dont le pollen émis en fin d’été est
particulièrement allergisant. La région Rhône-Alpes est la région française la plus affectée par la diffusion
de pollens d’ambroisie.
Les principales manifestations cliniques sont, pour les personnes sensibles, des rhinites, conjonctivites et
trachéites, qui peuvent parfois déclencher des formes d’asthme assez graves.
Les pollinoses (toutes plantes confondues) sont en augmentation. On estime que 10% à 20 % de la
population française est allergique aux pollens (9,2% en Rhône-Alpes selon une étude de 20041).
En Rhône-Alpes, la lutte contre l’ambroisie a été réactivée dans le cadre du Plan régional santéenvironnement
(PRSE) 2006-2010 qui consacrait une action spécifique à « l’amélioration de la lutte » et
suite à un colloque européen2 intitulé « Ambroisie 2008, de la connaissance à l’action » organisé à Aix-les-
Bains en novembre 2008. Les conclusions de ce colloque alertaient sur l’ampleur du problème de santé
publique posé par l’ambroisie dans plusieurs régions d’Europe (plaine du Pô en Italie, Hongrie, Croatie,
région Rhône-Alpes) et proposaient de mener des actions conjointes.
Au début de 2009, un Groupe de travail régional réunissant plusieurs acteurs des services de l’État et de
l’Assurance Maladie s’est constitué pour analyser l’impact sanitaire de l’ambroisie et estimer ses
conséquences économiques. Sollicité par ce groupe de travail, l’ORS l’a rejoint pour dresser un bilan de la
situation régionale.
Un premier rapport3, publié en janvier 2010, faisait le point sur les données environnementales et
médico-économiques, et présentait les résultats d’une étude qualitative auprès d’une quinzaine d’acteurs
de terrains. Un deuxième rapport4, publié en mars 2011, actualisait le précédent et rapportait l’étude
menée en novembre 2010 auprès de toutes les communes et intercommunalités de Rhône-Alpes.
Objectifs de l’étude
Les objectifs de cette troisième étude régionale sont de suivre les données de pollinisation de
l’ambroisie (données RNSA 2011) et les données médico-économiques sur les soins ambulatoires
remboursés par l’Assurance Maladie (données de l’Assurance Maladie 2010 et 2011) en complément des
rapports des années précédentes (de 2007 à 2010 pour la pollinisation, 2008 et 2009 pour les données
médico-économiques).
Le but est, à terme, de constituer un système d’information qui pourrait permettre de suivre, d’année
en année, ces différents indicateurs liés à l’ambroisie.",2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,Rhône-Alpes,Unspecified,Unit (department),Year,Year,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,11500000,9100000,13900000,15774193.79,14541800.08,11500000,15774193.79,14541800.08,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Cost estimate = average of high and low estimates on pp17. Includes costs such as medicines, consultations, blood tests, costs of people taking time off work.",Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC1505,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,11700000,,,17746963.82,16164619.05,11700000,17746963.82,16164619.05,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1506,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Mali,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,11700000,,,11421031.79,29409551.19,11700000,11421031.79,29409551.19,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1508,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,11800000,,,819284.2812,2049214.525,590000,40964.21406,102460.7262,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1510,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,11800000,,,819284.2812,2049214.525,590000,40964.21406,102460.7262,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1511,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Slovenia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,12000000,,,18202014.17,20957065.19,12000000,18202014.17,20957065.19,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1514,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,12091000,,,20516233.39,20516233.39,12091000,20516233.39,20516233.39,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Secondary costs from leafy spurge infestations on grazing land,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1518,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Senegal,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,12500000,,,12201957.04,30325745.51,12500000,12201957.04,30325745.51,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1519,,Bangsund1991a,"Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1991b,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,,Site,1990,Year,1990,1991,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,12576000,,,23593013.94,23593013.94,12576000,23593013.94,23593013.94,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare/Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS TO SOUTH DAKOTA'S ECONOMY ASSOCIATED WITH LEAFY SPURGE INFESTATIONS ON GRAZING LANDS, 1990",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk ,Yes
SC1523,,Holland2007,Assessing the economic impact of invasive species: The case of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solsitialis L.) in the rangelands of Idaho,"Julia, R., Holland, D.W, Guenthner, J.","Yellow starthistle (Centaurea solsitialis L.) is an invasive weed that creates problems for the management of Idaho's rangelands. A bioeconomic approach combined with an input–output economic model is used to estimate direct and secondary economic costs of the weed in relation to its interference with agricultural and non-agricultural benefits that rangelands provide. Direct economic costs of the infestations were estimated to be of 8.2 million ‘05 dollars per year, and secondary costs of 4.5 million ‘05 dollars per year, for a total of 12.7 million ‘05 dollars; agricultural related economic impacts accounted for 79% of this total cost, and non-agricultural for 21%.",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea solstitialis,,yellow starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,Idaho,Site,Between 1980 and 2007,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,1980,2007,Potentially ongoing,12786300,none,none,16048675.2,16048675.2,12786300,16048675.2,16048675.2,USD,2005,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Forestry ,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Camille Bernery,
SC1526,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Montana,Montana,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,12969000,,,24330295.63,24330295.63,12969000,24330295.63,24330295.63,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""… estimated using the North Dakota Input-Output Model (Coon et al. 1985)""",Marina Golivets,
SC1528,GS,Acquaye2005,Economic Consequences of Invasive Species Policies in the Presence of Commodity Programs: Theory and Application to Citrus Canker,"Albert K.A. Acquaye, Julian M. Alston, Hyunok Lee and Daniel A. Sumner","Many of the effects of invasive species occur in commodity markets affected by agricultural programs and policies, such as price and income supports, crop insurance, and trade barriers. In this paper, we focus on how policies to exclude, monitor and control, or eradicate invasive species interact with other policies. We present some general arguments, drawing on parallels in the literature on farm program impacts on the returns to agricultural research, and some preliminary results from a case study of citrus canker.",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,United States Department of Agriculture. Risk Management Agency. Participation Data: Summary Business Application. Data available at http: //www3.rma,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xanthomonas,Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri,,"Citrus canker, Citrus bacterial canker",Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,13000000,,,17715383.37,17715383.37,13000000,17715383.37,17715383.37,USD,2002,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Subsidy for damage-loss Insurance,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"The total premium for Florida juice oranges was about $26 million in 2002, with a subsidy of about $19.5 million, two-thirds of which were for citrus tree insurance (U.S. Department of Agriculture).",Melina Kouranditou,
SC1533,,Brundu2014,"Plant invaders in European and Mediterranean inland waters: profiles, distribution, and threats","Brundu, G.","The present brief and selective review
focuses on a set of invasive alien aquatic plant species
(notably the 21 listed by the European and Mediterranean
Plant ProtectionOrganisation, i.e., five A2 species,
11 invasive, 2 in the Observation List, 1 in the Alert List,
2 noteworthy), on definitions in use, on introduction
pathways, and ecological effects, although the social
and economic effects of freshwater invaders can be
diverse and substantial. Legislation, literature, and
scientific research dealing with plant invasions in inland
waters often merge different types of invasive plant
species and invaded habitats, as there are some
overlappings between the concepts of macrophyte,
aquatic plants, inland waters, wetlands, and riparian
habitats. Freshwater ecosystems may well be the most
endangered ecosystems in the world. Countless aquatic
plants have been introduced in Europe and in the
Mediterranean region, either deliberately because they
were thought to be ornamental or otherwise desirable, or
accidentally as releases from aquaria, dumping from
water gardens, or contaminants. The escape of alien
plants from managed environments is also frequent.
Aquatic invaders have strong negative impacts on native
biodiversity and many different impacts are reported in
the literature for Europe and worldwide. Plant invasions
in inlandwatersmay be considered as one of a syndrome
of factors that characterize degraded aquatic ecosystems.
There are a number of risk analysis, impact
assessment, ranking systems, decision trees, and prioritization
methods available throughout Europe and the
EPPO region, but the lack of a common framework for
assessing the risks posed by invasive alien aquatic
species is seen as a key gap. Successful management
should include prevention, habitat restoration, dedicated
risk assessment, prioritization, awareness raising, dedicated
legislation, collaboration between different
stakeholders, development of codes of conduct with
the horticultural sector, and prohibiting the sale,
purchase, and intentional release of some species in
the wild. Actions to protect the European and Mediterranean
inland waters from plants invasions are urgently
needed and could provide overarching benefits.",2015,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,11,N,Europe,United Kingdom,,United Kingdom,Country,2014,Year,2014,Unspecified,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,13510000,,,23017509.92,20027980.36,13510000,23017509.92,20027980.36,GBP,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,"In
2008, £1.93 million were spent for the management
and disposal of H. ranunculoides, and in 6 years, the
costs were multiplied seven times.",Ross Cuthbert,No
SC1534,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Bosnia and Herzegovina,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,13900000,,,21083999.75,21091445.86,13900000,21083999.75,21091445.86,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1539,,vanFrankenhuyzen1990,Development and current status of Bacillus thuringiensis for control of defoliating forest insects,van Frankenhuyzen,"Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterium that is now widely used for control of spruce budworm and several other defoliating forest insects in Canada. It took more than 25 years of research and development to bring Bt from first experimental use in the early 1960s into full operational use in the mid 1980s. Critical to this process was the adoption of HD-1 for commercial use, the standardization of formulations based on international units, and the development of higher potency products. An increase in product potency from 4?BIU/L in the early 1970s to 16.9?BIU/L in the mid 1980s, concomittant with improvements in formulation and application technology, reduced treatment costs while at the same time improving reliability of efficacy. A shift in political climate pushed Bt into operational use by 1985. Since then, Bt has been used in more than half of all spruce budworm control programs. The use of high-potency formulations (12.7 to 16.9?BIU/L) applied undiluted at 30?BIU in 2.4?L/ha or less has significantly reduced but not eliminated initial constraints of high treatment costs and inconsistent efficacy. Current research is focussed on further reducing these constraints. In the short term, registration of formulations containing 25?BIU/L or more is expected to permit application of reduced dosages in less than 1?L/ha and to clear the way for adoption of a split application scheme to increase reliability of efficacy. Selection and commercialization of more effective strains and the enhancement of natural strains by genetic or genetic engineering techniques offer exciting prospects for improvements in the longer term.",1990,English,Peer-reviewed article,Nealis2002,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Tortricidae,Choristoneura,Choristoneura fumiferana,,spruce budworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,forest,1\2,NA,North America,Canada,Quebec,Unspecified,Unit (Province),1985,Year,1985,1985,1985,1985,One-time,13994390,NA,NA,22501333.91,21163863.36,13994390,22501333.91,21163863.36,CAD,1990,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Calculated from Tables 2 and 3: (Area treated with Bt x cost of Bt) + (remaining area treated with chemicals x cost of chemicals). Separate rows in InvaCost for each year with cost data. Area treated with chemicals calculated from Table 2 (area not treated with Bt = area treated with chemicals). Cost = cost of operation excluding assessment and surveys, administrative overhead and research costs.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1540,,Washington2008,Invaders at the Gate - 2008 Strategic Plan,Washington Invasive Species Council,"Washington, the Evergreen State, is known for its lush, environmentally diverse landscapes. From the state’s ocean beaches, to its forests, to its grassy prairies, Washington is home to thousands of different plant and animal species. Among the 50 states it ranks in the top 15 for diversity of native species plants, animals, and birds.1Be it an orange-toothed rodent, a long-horned beetle, or a purple-flowered plant, invading  species of all kinds cross state borders or expand their presence into Washington every day. They come as the result of migration, deliberate introduction, and, very often, by chance. When invaders do make it past the front gate, they can bring unintended consequences. They can decimate native species and quickly degrade ecosystems. Animal and plant invaders – those already past the front gate and others trying to get through – have the potential to change the face of Washington, forever.  Invasive species are a threat to Washington’s environment and economy, exacting a high price for their presence. These biological invasions can produce serious, often irreversible effects on agriculture, recreation, and natural resources. While not all non-native species have aggressive traits, the sheer number of these species coming through our gates is increasing at an alarming rate. There are more than 650 non-native plant species documented in Washington.2  This figure represents only a fraction of the total number of non-native species present in the state. Because of the devastating effect on Washington’s plant, animal, and economy by some of these invaders, Washington citizens pay millions of dollars each year to prevent, control, and eradicate invasive species.Washington has several programs that have received national recognition for combating the negative effects of invasive species. However, the state lacks fundamental information such as:  important resources at risk, invasive species distribution, the extent of infestations, and the amount spent by agencies and programs. Furthermore, no comprehensive data have ever been compiled to present a broad picture of the invasive species problem or the degree to which the state’s current programs are managing the problem. To strengthen the state's invasive species efforts and make sound future decisions, we need this kind of fundamental information.",2007,English,Report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus cynosuroides,,Spartina,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,12a,N,North America,USA,,Washington,Site,2007,Year,1998,2007,1998,2007,Potentially ongoing,14000000,,,16550758.03,16550758.03,14000000,16550758.03,16550758.03,USD,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Between 1998 and 2007, state and federal agencies provided more than $14 million in funding  for cordgrass (Spartina) eradication programs in Washington.",Phillip Haubrock,
SC1544,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,South Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,14230000,,,24145728.32,24145728.32,14230000,24145728.32,24145728.32,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Secondary costs from leafy spurge infestations on grazing land,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1545,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,14469000,,,43508999.63,43508999.63,23192000,43508999.63,43508999.63,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct costs,Marina Golivets,
SC1546,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Chlorophyta,Ulvophyceae,Bryopsidales,Codiaceae,Codium,Codium fragile,,osyter thief,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,14482000,11994000,31186000,12567279.35,16053369.65,14482000,12567279.35,16053369.65,CAD,2002,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Andrew Kramer,
SC1547,,Center1997,Biological control,Center et al.,none available,1997,English,Book chapter,Pimentel2000,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Hydrilla,Hydrilla verticillata,,hydrilla,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Florida,Florida,Site,2000,Year,1997,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,14500000,,,20640150.75,20640150.75,14500000,20640150.75,20640150.75,USD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Public and social welfare,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1550,,Dextrase2002,"Preventing the introduction and spread of alien aquatic species in the Great Lakes. Pages 219-231 in Claudi et al. (2002) Alien Invaders in Canada's Water, Wetlands, and Forests",Dextrase,"[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] The St. Lawrence River–Great Lakes system is one of the largest freshwater systems in the world (Figure 1). The Great Lakes span a distance of 1200 km and cover a surface area of 244 000 km2 (Fuller et al. 1995). They account for 18% of the planet’s supply of fresh surface water, which is surpassed in volume only by the polar ice caps (only 1% of the Great Lakes’ freshwater supply is renewable). The waters of the Great Lakes flow eastward into the Atlantic Ocean through the
St. Lawrence River. The ecosystems contained within the Great Lakes drainage basin are richly diverse and include 100 taxa and 31 ecological community types
that are considered globally significant by the Nature Conservancy (Rankin and Crispin 1994). The Great Lakes basin has also been important to the history and development of the United States and Canada. Significant industrial and agricultural development has occurred within the basin: 45% of Canada’s industrial capacity
and 25% of Canada’s agricultural capacity. More than 33 million people live within the Great Lakes basin (Fuller et al. 1995), with about 9 million residing in Canada. Great Lakes water resources provide billions of dollars of economic value and thousands of jobs to the region. For example, the Great Lakes sport and commercial fishing industry contributes US$4.5 billion annually and supports 81 000 jobs in the region (GLPANS 1998).

Aquatic ecosystems within the Great Lakes basin have changed constantly over time. Changes to the...",2002,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Cephalaspidomorphi,Petromyzontiformes,Petromyzontidae,Petromyzon,Petromyzon marinus,,sea lamprey,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,NA,North America,Canada/USA,Diverse/Unspecified,Great Lakes,Regional,Unspecified,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,15000000,NA,NA,20440826.96,,15000000,20440826.96,,USD,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,The best-known control effort on the Great Lakes is the sea lamprey control program that was initiated in 1958 (GLFC 1985). The program involves the regular treatment (every three or four years) of about 300 Great Lakes tributaries with the lampricide TFM (3-trifluoromethyl-4-nitrophenol)... The sea lamprey control program costs about US$15 million per year for ongoing treatments.,Nigel Taylor,
SC1557,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Arachnida,Mesostigmata,Varroidae,Varroa,Varroa destructor,,varroa mite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,bee hives,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,15839424,,,27512224.1,25352938.26,15839424,27512224.1,25352938.26,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,pp65: additional hive deaths attributed to varroa mite. Report also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1561,,LSSG1999,Leafy Spurge Impact Assessment,Leafy Spurge Stakeholders Group (LSSG),[contains a lengthy executive summary],1999,English,Official report,Rempel2010,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),12b,N,North America,Canada,Manitoba,,Site,1999-2009,Year,1999,2009,1999,2009,One-time,16000000,,,15847313.1,19771776.72,16000000,15847313.1,19771776.72,CAD,1999,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Direct and indirect impacts due to reduced grazing capacity; I put 2009 here because a new, updated report was published in 2010, so it makes sense to assume that those costs occurred until then",Marina Golivets,
SC1565,,Harris2002,"Biological control of weeds in Canada: results, opportunities and constraints (in Claudi. M. et al. (eds.) Alien Invaders in Canada’s Waters, Wetlands, and Forests)","Harris, Shamoun","[FIRST PAGE OF TEXT] Biological control refers to the deliberate use of natural enemies (predators, parasites, pathogens, and competitors) to reduce a pest species to an acceptable density. There are three approaches: classical (inoculative), inundative (bioherbicide), and manipulative (conservation). The choice depends on whether the pest is native or alien, present on cultivated or uncultivated land, how persistent the species is, and whether the goal of control is economic or environmental. In this paper the target pests are weeds, but the approaches and principles are also applicable to insects and other organisms. With one exception, the Canadian weed biological control program targets weeds that cause economic losses in agriculture and forestry. This has required that biological control be integrated into crop management and be acceptable to the general public.

Classical biological control agents are self-perpetuating with varying dispersal abilities to provide
continuing control. Typically the targets are introduced plants that form dense persistent populations on uncultivated grasslands. The agents are frequently insects, but diseases and nematodes can be used. Whatever the species that is used, it must not harm desirable plants. Classical biological control is unlikely to be effective against short-term transitional weeds unless the agent disperses extremely well, increases rapidly, and has a high impact. Given the right problem, classical biological control is the cheapest and most environmentally friendly solution. 

Some oppose classical biological control because it involves establishing an alien species which, as such, does not belong in a natural Canadian environment. However, the habitat is no longer native if an alien weed dominates it. Biological control can usually transform a community dominated by an alien weed to a native community with a small weed component and population of its biological control agent. The US Agricultural
Risk Protection Act, 2000, recognizes this benefit. More meaningful concerns reflect the need for biological
control and the host range of the agents. 

Establishing the need for classical biological control involves weighing the costs versus the benefits in economic and ecological terms, which includes the possible impact on non-target organisms. Demonstrating that an agent will be safe costs about two scientist years, or about $800 000. For an in-depth discussion, see Corrigan in this publication (p. 279) and Harris (2000a) The enabling legislation is Canada’s Plant Protection Act. 

The basic criterion of safety used in North America is that the insect does not develop on desirable plants when confined to them. Certainly plants unsuitable in the tests are not at risk. However, during testing, larvae commonly develop on other plants in the host genus even when they do not attack them in nature. Unfortunately most alien weeds are in genera with native species; therefore, the test normally indicates that native plants are vulnerable, although less than 5% of the agents will attack them in nature. The discrepancy between the test and the field results arises because, for most insects, host selection is the responsibility of the egg-laying female. Thus, to identify problems more accurately, biological control agents developing on native plant species in the test need to be further subjected as adults to field tests, acceptable to the regulators, in regions where the native plant species occur. 

Classical biological control is used against alien forest weeds, but in Canada forest losses are largely from native plants. This dictates the use of inundative biological control, which uses native organisms, typically fungi, that are grown on a nutrient medium and then sprayed on the weed in a problem area. This creates a temporary local outbreak that declines in one to five years to the normal level in the environment. Damage to non-target plants must be limited, which means that the controlling organism either has a narrow host range or is restricted by the application method. The primary use of this method has been against native plants that increase following logging or other disturbances to interfere with forest regeneration. Watson and Wall (1995) provide background information. In agriculture, inundative biological control is of interest for major crop weeds that are not controlled by other means. The enabling legislation is Canada’s Pest Control Products Act. Present constraints to this method are the high cost of registration and the often small market for the product. 

Manipulative biological control modifies a habitat to improve the competitive advantage of existing natural…
",2002,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,,Manitoba,Site,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,16400000,NA,NA,28649206.56,28649206.56,16400000,28649206.56,28649206.56,USD,1992,Publication Year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,"1992 is year the original estimate was published. Pp293 ""Spurge costs and losses in North Dakota were estimated at US$105 million/year (Leistritz et al. 1992), which for Manitoba prorates to US$16.4 million/year"". No further details of calculation.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1567,,Wotton2004,Eradication success Down Under: heat treatment of a sunken trawler to kill the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida.,"Wotton, D.M., C. O’Brien, M.D. Stuart and D.J. Fergus.","Eradication of invasive species is difficult in the marine environment, and there have only been a few successes. We report the successful eradication of the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida from a sunken trawler in the Chatham Islands, New Zealand. New heat-treatment methods were developed as the most cost effective and environmentally acceptable option to kill Undaria. Monitoring of the trawler for three years after it sank found no Undaria after the vessel was treated. Key factors in the success of the eradication programme included: early detection, a rapid response, pre-existing knowledge of Undaria, an adaptive management approach, targeting of multiple life history stages, and the cooperation of the vessel's insurer.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,Schaffelke2007,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Phaeophyceae,Laminariales,Alariaceae,Undaria,Undaria pinnatfida,,Wakame,Aquatic,aquatic,Y,"22 m of water in sandy habitat, about 2.2
km from the nearest rocky reef.",11,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,"Hanson Bay, Chatham Island",Unit (sunken trawler),2000-2003,Year,2000,2003,2000,2003,One-time,16530304,,16530304,12790314.77,14712620.2,16530304,12790314.77,14712620.2,NZD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Monitoring/Surveillance,Management_costs,Pre-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"$43,500 for monthly inspections; March 2000 to March 2003, with a final inspection in Dec 2003; insurance comparny for sunken trawler paid for all costs",Jane Catford,
SC1568,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Greece,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,17000000,,,25786186.74,25976046.08,17000000,25786186.74,25976046.08,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1570,,Eagle2007,"Costs and losses imposed on California ranchers by yellow starthistle forage values,  invasive weed economics,  invasive weeds,  nonnative species CENTAUREA-SOLSTITIALIS,  SOIL While the significant ecosystem damage caused by invasive weeds has been well",Eagle  AJ  Eiswerth  ME  Johnson  WS  Schoenig  SE  van Kooten  GC,"While the significant ecosystem damage caused by invasive weeds has been well documented, the economic consequences of specific invasive weed species are poorly understood. Yellow starthistle(Centaurea solstitialis L., hereafter YST) is the most widespread noncrop weed in California, resulting in serious damage to forage on natural range and improved pasture. A survey was administered to California cattle ranchers to investigate YST infestation rates, loss of forage quantity and value, and control or eradication efforts. The results were used to estimate countywide losses and costs for 3 focus counties, as well as statewide losses/costs, due to YST in California. Total losses of livestock forage value due to YST on private land for the state of California are estimated at $7.65 million per year, with ranchers’ out-of-pocket expenditures on YST control amounting to $9.45 million per year. Together, these amount to the equivalent of 6%–7% of the total annual harvested pasture value for the state. Therefore, while the impacts are relatively small within the statewide total agricultural production system, losses and costs due to YST infestation do constrain California’s livestock grazing sector.
",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea solstitialis,,Yellow starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Rangeland and pasture,12b,NA,North America,USA,California,California,Site,2 year,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,17100000,10650000,23860000,22785294.9,22785294.9,17100000,22785294.9,22785294.9,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,he estimates in this table pertain to 49 of the 58 counties in California,,
SC1571,TC,Observatoire2012,Troisième rapport sur l'ambroisie en Rhône-Alpes: Analyse des données environnementales et médico-économiques,Observatoire Régional de la Santé Rhône-Alpes,"[First page of text] 1. CONTEXTE ET OBJECTIFS DE L’ETUDE
L'ambroisie (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) est une plante invasive annuelle dont le pollen émis en fin d’été est
particulièrement allergisant. La région Rhône-Alpes est la région française la plus affectée par la diffusion
de pollens d’ambroisie.
Les principales manifestations cliniques sont, pour les personnes sensibles, des rhinites, conjonctivites et
trachéites, qui peuvent parfois déclencher des formes d’asthme assez graves.
Les pollinoses (toutes plantes confondues) sont en augmentation. On estime que 10% à 20 % de la
population française est allergique aux pollens (9,2% en Rhône-Alpes selon une étude de 20041).
En Rhône-Alpes, la lutte contre l’ambroisie a été réactivée dans le cadre du Plan régional santéenvironnement
(PRSE) 2006-2010 qui consacrait une action spécifique à « l’amélioration de la lutte » et
suite à un colloque européen2 intitulé « Ambroisie 2008, de la connaissance à l’action » organisé à Aix-les-
Bains en novembre 2008. Les conclusions de ce colloque alertaient sur l’ampleur du problème de santé
publique posé par l’ambroisie dans plusieurs régions d’Europe (plaine du Pô en Italie, Hongrie, Croatie,
région Rhône-Alpes) et proposaient de mener des actions conjointes.
Au début de 2009, un Groupe de travail régional réunissant plusieurs acteurs des services de l’État et de
l’Assurance Maladie s’est constitué pour analyser l’impact sanitaire de l’ambroisie et estimer ses
conséquences économiques. Sollicité par ce groupe de travail, l’ORS l’a rejoint pour dresser un bilan de la
situation régionale.
Un premier rapport3, publié en janvier 2010, faisait le point sur les données environnementales et
médico-économiques, et présentait les résultats d’une étude qualitative auprès d’une quinzaine d’acteurs
de terrains. Un deuxième rapport4, publié en mars 2011, actualisait le précédent et rapportait l’étude
menée en novembre 2010 auprès de toutes les communes et intercommunalités de Rhône-Alpes.
Objectifs de l’étude
Les objectifs de cette troisième étude régionale sont de suivre les données de pollinisation de
l’ambroisie (données RNSA 2011) et les données médico-économiques sur les soins ambulatoires
remboursés par l’Assurance Maladie (données de l’Assurance Maladie 2010 et 2011) en complément des
rapports des années précédentes (de 2007 à 2010 pour la pollinisation, 2008 et 2009 pour les données
médico-économiques).
Le but est, à terme, de constituer un système d’information qui pourrait permettre de suivre, d’année
en année, ces différents indicateurs liés à l’ambroisie.",2012,French,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,France,Rhône-Alpes,Unspecified,Unit (department),Year,Year,2011,2011,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,17115000,14200000,20030000,23476115.37,21641992.03,17115000,23476115.37,21641992.03,EUR,2012,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health/Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Cost estimate = average of high and low estimates on pp17. Includes costs such as medicines, consultations, blood tests, costs of people taking time off work.",Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC1574,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Austria,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,17800000,,,26999654.35,23331168.58,17800000,26999654.35,23331168.58,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1576,,,Biological control of gorse: an ex-ante evaluation,Sandrey RA,,1985,English,Official report,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Ulex,Ulex europaeus,,gorse,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4b\12b,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,1984-5,Year,1984,1985,1984,1985,Potentially ongoing,17818000,,,23833858.34,39858614.82,17818000,23833858.34,39858614.82,NZD,1984,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,namechecks an unobtainable Monsanto (1984) report for indirect lost opportunity costs of up to 150 million. Benefits to beekeepers not costed but described,,
SC1582,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ranunculales,Papaveraceae,Argemone,Argemone mexicana,,Mexican poppy,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,18300000,,,1270584.945,3178019.135,915000,63529.24723,158900.9568,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1586,,Tumber2014,Pierce’s disease costs California $104 million per year.,Tumber et al.,"Pierce’s disease of grapevines, caused by a strain of the bacteria Xylella fastidiosa, threatens an industry with a farm value of production exceeding $3 billion per year. The grape industry incurs substantial costs from losses of vines to the disease and efforts to mitigate damage. Additional costs are borne by the public in providing programs that aim to contain the disease and develop longer-term solutions, and by the citrus, nursery and grape industries in complying with those programs. Aggregating the costs of vine losses, industry assessments, compliance costs, and expenditures by government entities, we estimate the cost of Pierce’s disease in California is approximately $104.4 million per year. Of that, $48.3 million funds Pierce’s disease activities undertaken by various government agencies, the nursery and citrus industries and the UC system, and $56.1 million is the cost of lost production and vine replacement borne by grape growers",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xylella,Xylella fastidiosa,,Pierce’s disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,vineyards,NA,NA,North America,USA,California,,Site,1 year,Year,2009,2010,2009,2010,One-time,18600000,,,21251458.96,21251458.96,18600000,21251458.96,21251458.96,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"prevent the spread of GWSS from infested to noninfested areas, surveying and detection, response to outbreaks or GWSS infestations, and outreach.",,
SC1587,,Bangsund1991a,"Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge in Montana, South Dakota, and Wyoming",Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1991b,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Montana,,Site,Unspecified,Year,1990,1991,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,18688000,,,35059338.78,35059338.78,18688000,35059338.78,35059338.78,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare/Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS TO MONTANA'S ECONOMY ASSOCIATED WITH LEAFY SPURGE INFESTATIONS ON GRAZING LANDS, 1990",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk ,Yes
SC1588,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4b,N,North America,Canada,,Manitoba,Site,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,18870000,,,18689924.88,23318339.17,18870000,18689924.88,23318339.17,CAD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"1Leafy Spurge Stakeholder’s Group (1999) Leafy Spurge Economic Impact Assessment, WESTARC Group, Brandon University, Manitoba;",Andrew Kramer,
SC1589,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4b,N,North America,Canada,,Alberta And Ontario,Site,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,18870000,,,18689924.88,23318339.17,18870000,18689924.88,23318339.17,CAD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,2Assumes 50% of Manitoba’s cost to each of Alberta and Saskatchewan,Andrew Kramer,
SC1591,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Slovakia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,19700000,,,29881639.93,42391565.36,19700000,29881639.93,42391565.36,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1593,,LSSG1999,Leafy Spurge Impact Assessment,Leafy Spurge Stakeholders Group (LSSG),[contains a lengthy executive summary],1999,English,Official report,Rempel2010,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,various,NA,N,North America,Canada,Manitoba,,Site,1999-2009,Year,1999,2009,1999,2009,One-time,20000000,,,19809141.37,24714720.9,20000000,19809141.37,24714720.9,CAD,1999,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""a total economic impact of $20 million based on the direct costs associated with a reduced carrying capacity of grazing, the impacts on public lands for recreation and reduced habitat value, and the impact of infestation on right-of-ways and the indirect or secondary economic impacts""; I put 2009 here because a new, updated report was published in 2010, so it makes sense to assume that those costs occurred until then",Marina Golivets,
SC1602,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Rwanda,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,20500000,,,20011209.54,58282867.67,20500000,20011209.54,58282867.67,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1613,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Germany,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,21800000,,,33066992.41,30118691.91,21800000,33066992.41,30118691.91,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1614,,,An assessment of the effectiveness of a long-term ecosystem restoration project in a fynbos shrubland catchment in South Africa,Fill  JM  Forsyth  GG  Kritzinger Klopper  S  Le Maitre  DC  van Wilgen  BW,"The long-term effectiveness of ecological restoration projects is seldom reported in the scientific literature.
This paper reports on the outcomes of ecosystem restoration following the clearing of alien Pinus
plantations and associated alien plant invasions over 13 years from an 8000 ha mountain catchment in
the Western Cape Province, South Africa. We examined the goals, methods and costs of management,
and the ecological outcomes in terms of reduced alien plant cover and native vegetation recovery. While
the goals were not explicitly formulated at the outset, they were implicitly focussed on the conservation
of water resources, the restoration of biodiversity, and the provision of employment. Initially, most (>90%
of the area) was occupied by Pinus and Acacia invasions, mostly at low densities. The cost of control
(initial clearing and up to 16 follow-up visits to remove emergent seedlings) amounted to almost ZAR 50
million (14 ZAR ~ 1US$). Although the cover of alien plants was greatly reduced, over 1000 ha still
support dense or medium invasions (>25% cover), and the area occupied by scattered Pinus plants
increased by over 3000 ha to >5700 ha. A reliance on passive restoration had not yet resulted in full
recovery of the natural vegetation. The mean number of species, and total projected canopy cover on
50 m2 plots was lower in cleared than in comparable reference sites with pristine vegetation (21 vs 32
species/plot, and 94 vs 168% cover respectively). While the project is ongoing, we conclude that the
entire area could revert to a more densely-invaded state in the event of a reduction of funding. Several
changes to the management approach (including the integrated use of fire, a greater use of power tools,
and active re-seeding of cleared areas with indigenous shrubs) would substantially increase the future
effectiveness of the project and the sustainability of its outcomes.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia longifolia,,Golden Wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,upper Berg River catchment,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Western Cape Province,Site,13 years (since 2001),Period,2001,2014,2001,2014,Potentially ongoing,21833247,,,1515901.362,3791610.752,1559517.643,108278.6687,270829.3394,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Researchers obtained information on the extent and cost of control from the Department of Environmental Affairs’ spatial database.,Melissa Welsh,
SC1621,,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,,Washington,Site,1987,Year,1987,1987,1987,1987,One-time,23621000,,,29647807.18,29647807.18,23621000,29647807.18,29647807.18,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,Phillip Haubrock,
SC1622,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,23900000,,,36252344.89,30954832.03,23900000,36252344.89,30954832.03,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1625,,Rempel2010,Economic impact assessment of leafy spurge in Southern Manitoba,Rempel K,[contains a lengthy executive summary],2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,North America,Canada,Manitoba,,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2009,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,24106409,,,24127867.6,22927316.95,24106409,24127867.6,22927316.95,CAD,2009,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Indirect costs or impacts result from expenditures not made in other sectors of the economy as a consequence of reduced output in those sectors whose direct impacts are measured.""",Marina Golivets,
SC1627,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,South Dakota,North Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,24193000,,,41051131.79,41051131.79,24193000,41051131.79,41051131.79,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Direct costs from leafy spurge infestations on grazing land,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1629,TC,NME2007,Strategy on Invasive Alien Species,Norwegian Ministry of the Environment,"[First page of text] CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The introduction of invasive alien species is considered to be one of the most serious threats to global biodiversity. Alien species can also have substantial economic and social impacts.
People have moved plant and animal species to new areas throughout history: often, this has been for our own benefit, to use them as agricultural crops or livestock. In many cases, the consequences of such introductions have been mainly positive or neutral.
More recently, there has been a considerable rise in introductions of alien species, particularly as a result of changes in international patterns of transport and trade. This has resulted in growing awareness of the negative impacts certain species can have when they are introduced outside their natural distribution ranges.
In Norway, too, the introduction and spread of invasive alien species is a serious and growing threat to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and has already inflicted heavy costs on society.
Dealing with alien species involves a complex set of challenges. Most introduced species are not able to survive and spread in the wild. Others become established without harming the ecosystems where they are introduced. But some species both become established and cause significant damage to ecosystems, for example by displacing native species or spreading disease. These are known as invasive alien species, and they can have very serious negative impacts, both on ecosystems and biodiversity and on industries such as agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture that are based on the use of these ecosystems.
Measures to address the problem of invasive alien species in Norway will also be important in efforts to achieve the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010. Under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Norway has undertaken as far as possible and as appropriate to prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.
Many different bodies in a range of administrative sectors are responsible for action to address the problem of alien species and for administration and enforcement of legislation relating to the introduction, spread, and management and control of alien species. Effective action to reduce the threat from alien species therefore requires targeted and coordinated cross-sectoral efforts. The decision to draw up a cross-sectoral national strategy on alien species was taken in the 2005 white paper on the government’s environmental policy and the state of the environment in Norway (Report No. 21 (2004–2005) to the Storting) and the subsequent debate in the Storting.
This document describes Norway’s goals and principles for dealing with alien species and specific measures that will be implemented in all relevant administrative sectors. The strategy is intended to ensure that there is a common understanding and",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Ochrophyta,Dictyochophyaceae,Florenciellales,Florenciellaceae,Pseudochattonella,Pseudochattonella verruculosa,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,along the coast of Southern Norway,11,NA,Europe,Norway,NA,Southern Norway,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,25000000,,,5042068.532,3309040.297,25000000,5042068.532,3309040.297,NOK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp10: ""The alga Chattonella cf. verruculosa caused serious losses in the fish farming industry along the coast of Southern Norway in 2001. Almost 1000 tonnes of farmed fish worth NOK 25 million died. The alga was first registered in Norway in 1998, and may have reached Europe from the Far East with ballast water.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1632,,SerbesoffKing2003,"Melaleuca in Florida: A literature review on the taxonomy, distribution, biology, ecology, economic importance and control measures OXYOPS-VITIOSA COLEOPTERA, CONTROL AGENT, QUINQUENERVIA MYRTACEAE, SOUTH FLORIDA, HOST-RANGE, BOTRYOSPHAERIA-RIBIS,",Serbesoff King K,"Melaleuca  (Melaleuca  quinquenervia  (Cav.)  S.T.  Blake)  is  alarge  tree  species  that  occurs  naturally  throughout  easternAustralia, New Caledonia, Irian Jaya and southern New Guin-ea.  In  North  America,  melaleuca  has  primarily  infested  theFlorida peninsula south of Lake Okeechobee. It is classed as aFederal Noxious Weed in the United States and as a Prohibit-ed Aquatic Plant and Noxious Weed in the state of Florida. Inthe  continental  United  States,  melaleuca  has  been  recordedfrom  Louisiana,  Texas  and  California.  Additionally,  this  treehas  become  moderately  invasive  in  Puerto  Rico  and  Hawaii.Melaleuca  rapidly  invades  moist,  open  habitats,  both  dis-turbed and undisturbed, and forms dense, impenetrable mo-nocultures.  In  general,  invasion  is  less  prominent  in  forestedsites  than  marshes;  however,  only  dense  hammock-type  com-munities seem to produce enough shade to prevent invasion.Invasive characteristics of melaleuca include its evergreen hab-it, prolific seed production, frequent flowering, and flood anddrought  tolerance.  This  tree  threatens  biodiversity  of  nativeflora and fauna by diminishing the value of their habitat. Thelarge expanses of melaleuca on public lands have cost publicagencies  in  Florida  $25  million  in  control  efforts  between1989 and 1999. Estimations of economic impacts of melaleucaon recreation, tourism, fires, loss of endangered species, andmore range from $168 million annually to $2 billion over a pe-riod  of  20  years.  Various  methods  of  control  (chemical,  me-chanical, manual, biological and integrated) are evaluated.Key  words:  Melaleuca  quinquenervia,  exotic  invasive  plant,herbicides, biological control.",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Melaleuca,Melaleuca quinquenervia,,broad-leaved paperbark,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,1\2\3,N,North America,USA,,Florida,Site,1999,Period,1989,1999,1989,1999,One-time,25000000,,,33311834.65,33311834.65,25000000,33311834.65,33311834.65,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control costs,Phillip Haubrock,
SC1634,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Italy,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,25100000,,,38072546.31,36051555.42,25100000,38072546.31,36051555.42,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,SC1634 (1886),no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1635,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,floating pennywort,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,Y,rivers/canals,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,Wales,Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,115000,,,240688.2129,186586.7805,115000,240688.2129,186586.7805,GBP,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Table 4.8: cost to recreation. Cost also given separately for England and Wales.,Nigel Taylor/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC1637,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Bulgaria,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,25800000,,,39134330.47,40102290.91,25800000,39134330.47,40102290.91,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1670,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Croatia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,30500000,,,46263452.69,8856814.177,30500000,46263452.69,8856814.177,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1675,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Rodentia,Muridae,Rattus,Rattus norvegicus,,brown rat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,homes,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,31550189,,,54800974.46,50499942.03,31550189,54800974.46,50499942.03,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,pp124. Cost of rat control in homes. Report also gives costs separately for England/Scotland/Wales.,Nigel Taylor,No
SC1682,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Tanzania,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,32400000,,,31627472.64,96589867.17,32400000,31627472.64,96589867.17,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1689,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Germany,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,34000000,,,51572373.49,46974106.64,34000000,51572373.49,46974106.64,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1694,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Serbia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,36000000,,,54606042.51,1080004.829,36000000,54606042.51,1080004.829,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1695,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Ricinus,Ricinus communis,,Castor bean,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,36700000,,,2548112.976,6373404.496,1835000,127405.6488,318670.2248,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1699,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana/Big-sage/Wild-sage/Red-sage/White-sage/Tickberry/West Indian lantana/Umbelanterna,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Indian Ocean Coastal Belt biome,5,N,Africa,South Africa,,Indian Ocean Coastal Belt Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,37700000,,,5195482.953,10522884.05,2513333.333,346365.5302,701525.6036,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1702,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Niger,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,38000000,,,37093949.39,95285977.68,38000000,37093949.39,95285977.68,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1704,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Cytisus,Cytisus scoparius,,Scotch broom,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,39465000,,,42133713.72,42133713.72,39465000,42133713.72,42133713.72,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC1705,,Senator&Rozenberg2016,Assessment of economic and environmental impact of invasive plant species,"Senator, SA, and AG Rozenberg","This article presents data from a review of published works on the economic damage caused by invasive plant species, their ecological and economical impact, and the legal regulation of biological invasions.
It is concluded that it is necessary to elaborate and adopt a national strategy on alien species, federal regulatory acts concerning the policy on invasive organisms, and general approaches and criteria to evaluate the risk of their spread. Effective control of invasive species is only possible at the rational approach, which takes into consideration individual ecological-biological features of the species, their relations with other components of the community, the properties of the ecosystem invaded by them, expenditures for their control, and the period and consequences of their eradication.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum sosnowskyi,,Cow parsnip,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Russia,,Leningrad Oblast,Site,2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,Potentially ongoing,40000000,,,609223.4046,1726247.641,40000000,609223.4046,1726247.641,RUB,2016,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Ana Novoa,No
SC1707,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus armeniacus,,Armenian blackberry (Himalayan,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,40133000,,,42846885.41,42846885.41,40133000,42846885.41,42846885.41,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Cost of various invasive species on Personal Income.,,
SC1711,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Benin,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,41700000,,,40705728.67,109480469.3,41700000,40705728.67,109480469.3,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1713,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Ascidiacea,Stolidobranchia,Styelidae,Styela,Styela clava,,Clubbed tunicate,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,42517000,34013000,88435000,45574613.19,42879034.3,42517000,45574613.19,42879034.3,CAD,2006,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Andrew Kramer,
SC1717,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Moldova,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,43400000,,,65830617.92,8544543.758,43400000,65830617.92,8544543.758,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1719,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum mauritianum,,Earleaf nightshade/Woolly nightshade/Fannel weed/Bugweed/Tobacco weed/Tobacco bush/Wild tobacco/Kerosene plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Grassland biome (excluding arid areas),4,N,Africa,South Africa,,Grassland Biome (excluding Arid Areas),Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,44000000,,,6063693.633,12281350.09,2933333.333,404246.2422,818756.6726,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1721,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Cytisus,Cytisus scoparius,,Scotch broom,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,44853000,,,47886062.62,47886062.62,44853000,47886062.62,47886062.62,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC1723,TC,NME2007,Strategy on Invasive Alien Species,Norwegian Ministry of the Environment,"[First page of text] CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The introduction of invasive alien species is considered to be one of the most serious threats to global biodiversity. Alien species can also have substantial economic and social impacts.
People have moved plant and animal species to new areas throughout history: often, this has been for our own benefit, to use them as agricultural crops or livestock. In many cases, the consequences of such introductions have been mainly positive or neutral.
More recently, there has been a considerable rise in introductions of alien species, particularly as a result of changes in international patterns of transport and trade. This has resulted in growing awareness of the negative impacts certain species can have when they are introduced outside their natural distribution ranges.
In Norway, too, the introduction and spread of invasive alien species is a serious and growing threat to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and has already inflicted heavy costs on society.
Dealing with alien species involves a complex set of challenges. Most introduced species are not able to survive and spread in the wild. Others become established without harming the ecosystems where they are introduced. But some species both become established and cause significant damage to ecosystems, for example by displacing native species or spreading disease. These are known as invasive alien species, and they can have very serious negative impacts, both on ecosystems and biodiversity and on industries such as agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture that are based on the use of these ecosystems.
Measures to address the problem of invasive alien species in Norway will also be important in efforts to achieve the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010. Under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Norway has undertaken as far as possible and as appropriate to prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.
Many different bodies in a range of administrative sectors are responsible for action to address the problem of alien species and for administration and enforcement of legislation relating to the introduction, spread, and management and control of alien species. Effective action to reduce the threat from alien species therefore requires targeted and coordinated cross-sectoral efforts. The decision to draw up a cross-sectoral national strategy on alien species was taken in the 2005 white paper on the government’s environmental policy and the state of the environment in Norway (Report No. 21 (2004–2005) to the Storting) and the subsequent debate in the Storting.
This document describes Norway’s goals and principles for dealing with alien species and specific measures that will be implemented in all relevant administrative sectors. The strategy is intended to ensure that there is a common understanding and",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Agromyzidae,Liriomyza,Liriomyza huidobrensis,,serpentine leaf miner,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,Europe,Norway,NA,NA,Country,2002,Year,2002,2002,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,45000000,40000000,50000000,9075723.358,5956272.535,45000000,9075723.358,5956272.535,NOK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp10 and pp13: ""Efforts to eradicate the South American leafminer Liriomyza huidobrensis cost the horticulture industry NOK 40–50 million in 2002. The species reached Norway as a stowaway on imported plants.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1726,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia cyclops,,Coastal wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Fynbos,3,N,Africa,South Africa,,Fynbos Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,45300000,,,6242848.217,12644208.16,3020000,416189.8811,842947.2106,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1730,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum mauritianum,,Earleaf nightshade/Woolly nightshade/Fannel weed/Bugweed/Tobacco weed/Tobacco bush/Wild tobacco/Kerosene plant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Mois savanna biome,4,N,Africa,South Africa,,Mois Savanna Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,45700000,,,6297972.705,12755856.8,3046666.667,419864.847,850390.4531,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1733,,Oregon2014,Economic Impact From Selected Noxious Weeds in Oregon,"The Research Group, LLC","Noxious weeds are depriving Oregon agriculture and other natural resource industries of significant revenues.  This causes adverse economic impacts to Oregon's economy.  The Oregon Department of Agriculture Noxious Weed Control Program (ODA) contracted with The Research Group, LLC (TRG) in Corvallis to conduct an economic impact study for current and potential infestations of specific noxious weeds on Oregon rangelands, farmlands, forestlands, and wildlands.  The study is distinctive in that it incorporates Oregon WeedMapper software program results for existing invasions, which was analyzed along with other environmental variables using a unique geospatial analysis model to provide noxious weed habitat suitability data for potential infestations. 
 
The study found there is an estimated annual loss of almost $83.5 million personal income to the State's economy from 25 selected weed species.  (All referenced values in the study are adjusted to 2012 dollars.)  That is the equivalent to the loss of about 1,900 jobs in the private sector.  If left unchecked, there is a potential annual loss of $1.8 billion personal income and 40,800 jobs.  Two of the 25 selected weeds, Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom, are widespread and contribute $79.6 million to the current overall economic impact.  The remaining 23 species are limited in distribution and are under intensive management thus contributing to less than five percent of total current impacts. 
 
The purpose of this current study is to update a previous similar study of noxious weeds found in Oregon.  Case descriptions for several individual species are documented to bring clarity for how different prevention and control programs are utilized and have demonstrated success.  Government policy implications for providing noxious weed research and control program services are discussed.  In particular, the current study provides an opportunity for ODA to look at the impacts of two widespread invasive weeds (Armenian blackberry and Scotch broom) and address the potential economic impact of up and coming noxious weeds.  The study reveals the benefits of having safeguards such as biological, prevention, and other control programs in place to minimize impacts. 
 
The noxious weeds selected for the analysis contain all but one of the previous study's weeds, two grouped together, and six additional species for a total of 25 weeds.  This economic analysis is limited to measurements of regional economic impacts (REI) using the metrics for business sales, personal income, and jobs.  This economic analysis distilled the selected weeds into 15 unique economic model groupings.  The marginal REI calculations for the groupings can be used to calculate a new weed's economic impacts. 
 
The economic impact information is supplemented with explanations and estimated unit costs for different control approaches including none; prevention; early detection and rapid response (EDRR); and, long-term maintenance.  The cost discussions when related to the economic impact results provide illuminating information about the importance of control programs.  However, the provided economic impact information in the current study is not from a formal benefit-cost analysis (BCA).  The REI measure tells us an immediate with or without change in economic activity.  A BCA deals with the time value of money where sometimes one-time costs 

 
 xi D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
are incurred today, but net economic benefits accrue far into the future.  A BCA can include externality effects or changed societal values, and a BCA can account for the positive benefits as well as the foregone economic activity.  The disadvantage of a BCA is that the measurement can lack tangibility and authenticity.  The public and decision makers are generally only provided simple benefit-to-cost ratios and other summary indexes without knowing assumptions and methods. 
 
A properly conducted BCA will show whether the net economic benefits for a single weed control project make it worth undertaking a control program given commercial and recreational production to be recovered or preserved.  For example, the previous study found that biological control of tansy ragwort has a $13 return for every $1 investment and prevention programs have a benefit to cost ratio of 34 to one. 
 
The assumed affected economic activities for the analyzed weed species were associated with the previous study four land types: 
 
1. Rangelands:  livestock loss, reduced cattle foraging, and reduced wildlife grazing. 
2. Farmlands:  seed loss, decreased other agriculture, and reduced aquaculture. 
3. Forestland:  reduced timber production. 
4. Wildlands:  wildlife and fish stressor that lowers hunting, fishing, and boating recreational uses. 
 
Economic model parameters specific to the analyzed weeds include the following: 
 
1. Plant coverage factor.  The share of the infested areas that affects a particular economic activity. 
2. Degradation factor of the economic activity.  This factor can have various interpretations depending on the economic activity.  For example, it could be interpreted as a cow mortality rate for the livestock economic activity.  The assigned degradation factors are different for an economic activity affected for a particular analyzed noxious weed located on a particular land type.  The factors are normalized to apply to an economic activity and are usually expressed as a percent. 
3. Land production factors.  The factors are an assignment based on the land use for livestock, other agriculture, timber, or wildlife management. 
 
The geospatial analysis model developed to show current and potential area infestations is titled Kinetic Resource and Environmental Spatial System (KRESS).  Its output was the potential range across Oregon for the 25 selected weeds.  The modeling was based on the weeds' currently known locations, and their relationship with environmental and elevation variables.  A post KRESS outcome factor was applied to forestry susceptible areas to account for land management set asides for non-timber production.  The KRESS models utilized the Oregon WeedMapper dataset, which is comprised of 300,000 known weed infestations across the state.  The KRESS input data is collected through partnerships with non-profit, local, county and federal agencies.  The KRESS determined mean predicted area was bounded with confidence intervals of one 

 
 xii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
standard deviation to provide a statistical measure of precision.  Potential weed ranges were compared against different land uses capable of being degraded by noxious weeds.  The eight land types in the KRESS model were mapped to the four land types used in the economic activity modeling. 
 
Of the estimated foregone economic activity from current levels of noxious weed infestations ($83.5 million personal income and about 1.9 thousand jobs), the economic impact shares from the analyzed species three largest contributors (in order) are:  Armenian blackberry 48 percent, Scotch broom 47 percent, and rush skeletonweed two percent.  The current study economic impacts without the six additional analyzed species are $43.1 million, which compares to the previous study $101.5 million.  The decrease would be an indicator of success in the containment efforts for the previous study's analyzed species. 
 
The estimated economic impact of the analyzed species would be between $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion personal income if infestation moved into the susceptible areas.  The point estimate for mean within this range would represent 40.8 thousand jobs.  The three analyzed species with the largest contributions for susceptible areas are:  Armenian blackberry 15 percent, rush skeletonweed 12 percent, and gorse 11 percent.  For the six species analyzed for susceptible areas in the previous study (tansy ragwort, distaff thistle, leafy spurge, purple starthistle, hawkweeds, and spartina), the current study economic impacts from susceptible areas is $305.0 million as compared to the previous study $68.7 million.  While methods differ between the two studies on the estimation of susceptible habitat, an inference is that there is a growing threat from the six species. 
 
The results are from complex methodological calculations that have high uncertainty.  For example, the species with the second highest economic loss threat of the 25 analyzed species is Scotch broom.  The current infestation share of lost economic activity for this species is $39.5 million personal income.  The important lost economic activity associated with this species is from timber production degradation following invasion.  An uncertainty analysis shows a 42 percent increase in the degradation factor and susceptible area would about double the lost income over the current study estimate. 
 
There are five case studies that provide examples of control projects conducted by ODA.  Biological control and prevention programs are shown to be beneficial and can have a high return on the investment from these types of activities. 
 
The unintended spread of introduced species such as Scotch broom can turn them into undesirable plants in a very short time.  The costs of direct control, such as herbicides, are often substantial, especially in extensive rangeland environments.  Concerns about the cost effectiveness of chemical treatment and growing public concern about environmental safety have led to more research and use of insects or microorganisms that adversely affect the unwanted plant.  While more emphasis is being placed on biological controls, chemical or manual control in the early stages of invasion may also result in favorable cost effectiveness.  Programs for existing noxious weeds that are expensive to eradicate with manual or chemical means, and that have no potential biological control agents, may not evaluate financially favorable.  In such cases, education about containment may be the only option. 

 
 xiii D:\Data\Documents\swd\nox weed13 report.docx 
 
The control and spread of noxious weeds are of public concern because of a private market externality problem.  The background research and maintenance costs can be prohibitive for any single individual or even single industry.  A public agency may need to be involved when private party culpability and enforcement processes are not adequate for controlling invasions.  Once control programs have been established, the private businesses will become a free rider to the benefits of the program in the case the weed is deleterious to commercial production.  Depending on harm caused by particular weeds, the public will also benefit from control programs through greater recreational use opportunity.  In either case, there is a gain in social values from knowing ecosystems are being restored. 
 
ODA serves as a leader in protecting natural and agricultural resources from the introduction and spread of noxious weeds.  ODA approaches noxious weed control with an integrated, multidisciplinary approach.  Integrated Weed Management (IWM) is a decision making process based on the best available science and experience of weed managers.  Control options depend on site-specific information and the best strategy or combinations of strategies for effective management decisions.  IWM uses all available methods and techniques for noxious weed control including prevention, mechanical, cultural, chemical and biological control. 
 
There are many entities involved in noxious weed management in Oregon including state and federal agencies, county weed control programs, cooperative weed management areas, and universities.  The Oregon Invasive Species Council serves to protect Oregon's natural resources from invasive species thorough coordination efforts.  Other regional and national groups are engaged to increase awareness, address policy needs, and direct resources toward invasive plant control.  Government agencies and universities contribute through research services, sponsored prevention and control operations, financial incentive grants, and punitive regulations. ",2014,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus armeniacus,,Armenian blackberry (Himalayan,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,,Site,1 year,Year,2012,2012,2012,2012,One-time,46815000,,,49980737.56,49980737.56,46815000,49980737.56,49980737.56,USD,2012,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Noxious Weeds Regional Economic Impacts of  CURRENT Areas Measured by Direct Sales,,
SC1744,,Cusack2009,The Economics of Invasive Species,"Cusack, Chris, Michael Harte, and Samuel Chan","The prevention, eradication, and control of invasive species is an economic and policy issue and has less to do with biology and ecology than many people involved in managing natural resources realize. Invasive species were introduced into the United States as a result of trade, commerce, and the fulfillment of cultural needs. Decisions about agricultural production, conversion of land from forest to fields to towns, the growth of trade and tourism, and the choice of introduced species for food production, garden ornamentals, and for hunting and fishing are among the fundamental economic drivers of the invasive species problem. Economics provides us with many of the tools we need to understand the drivers of the invasive species problem and inform managers and policymakers about the costs of invasive species and the costs and benefits of different prevention, eradication, and control measures. Studies have been carried out to estimate the economic effects of invasive species and their management on natural resources. These have been particularly focused on forest or agricultural production losses and control costs, but the economic impacts on ecosystem functioning and human health have been less well studied at both state and national levels. Examples of estimates of the annual cost of invasive species in the U.S. and Oregon (in 2008 dollars) are shown in the chart below. Although these studies provide policymakers with important information with which to make decisions, inconsistency in study methodologies limits the usability and comparability of these studies in making policy decisions. A much wider role for economics is needed that goes beyond financial analyses of agricultural or timber production losses and control costs and embraces measures of the impact of invasive species on total economic value and the consequences of the loss or impairment of ecosystem services for the economic well-being of Oregon. Early detection and rapid response (EDRR) and prevention are among the most cost-efficient and -effective ways of reducing the costs of invasive species. Education is a primary process driving EDRR and prevention. Enhanced education of the public, government agencies, industry, and nongovernmental organizations is needed to strengthen all links in the invasive species management chain.",2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Lythraceae,Lythrum,Lythrum salicaria,,Purple loosestrife,Semi-Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,,NA,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,50000000,NA,NA,56924462.87,56924462.87,50000000,56924462.87,56924462.87,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,"Table 2: Purple loosestrife (U.S.) Control costs, forage losses",Nigel Taylor,
SC1748,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Mois savanna biome,4,N,Africa,South Africa,,Mois Savanna Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,51200000,,,7055934.409,14291025.56,3413333.333,470395.6273,952735.0372,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1754,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,53130000,,,99673730.18,99673730.18,53130000,99673730.18,99673730.18,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""… estimated using the North Dakota Input-Output Model (Coon et al. 1985)""",Marina Golivets,
SC1757,,Leitch1994,"Economic effect of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains: Methods, models, and results","Leitch, J. A., Leistritz, F. L., and Bangsund, D. A.","Research was initiated in 1989 to develop a bioeconomic model of leafy spurge in the upper Great Plains. The study resulted in two M.S. theses, several monographs, and numerous articles in periodicals and professional journals. Methods included budget analyses and regional economic analyses. Models of leafy spurge patch expansion, infestation and grazing carrying capacity, infestation and wildlife habitat, and wildlife and wildlands were developed. Leafy spurge infestation results in an estimated direct annual impact of $40.5 million in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming. Impacts in North Dakota account for nearly 67 percent of the total. Total secondary impacts could be as high as $89 million per year and represent the potential loss of 1,433 jobs. While more work could be done to refine the models, it is clear that leafy spurge control deserves attention, especially when leafy spurge acreage has been doubling about every ten years. ",1994,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Euphorbiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,53989000,,,91609538.05,91609538.05,53989000,91609538.05,91609538.05,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Secondary costs from leafy spurge infestations on grazing land,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1758,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,France,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,54300000,,,82364114.13,70328342.22,54300000,82364114.13,70328342.22,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1760,TC,NME2007,Strategy on Invasive Alien Species,Norwegian Ministry of the Environment,"[First page of text] CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The introduction of invasive alien species is considered to be one of the most serious threats to global biodiversity. Alien species can also have substantial economic and social impacts.
People have moved plant and animal species to new areas throughout history: often, this has been for our own benefit, to use them as agricultural crops or livestock. In many cases, the consequences of such introductions have been mainly positive or neutral.
More recently, there has been a considerable rise in introductions of alien species, particularly as a result of changes in international patterns of transport and trade. This has resulted in growing awareness of the negative impacts certain species can have when they are introduced outside their natural distribution ranges.
In Norway, too, the introduction and spread of invasive alien species is a serious and growing threat to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and has already inflicted heavy costs on society.
Dealing with alien species involves a complex set of challenges. Most introduced species are not able to survive and spread in the wild. Others become established without harming the ecosystems where they are introduced. But some species both become established and cause significant damage to ecosystems, for example by displacing native species or spreading disease. These are known as invasive alien species, and they can have very serious negative impacts, both on ecosystems and biodiversity and on industries such as agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture that are based on the use of these ecosystems.
Measures to address the problem of invasive alien species in Norway will also be important in efforts to achieve the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010. Under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Norway has undertaken as far as possible and as appropriate to prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.
Many different bodies in a range of administrative sectors are responsible for action to address the problem of alien species and for administration and enforcement of legislation relating to the introduction, spread, and management and control of alien species. Effective action to reduce the threat from alien species therefore requires targeted and coordinated cross-sectoral efforts. The decision to draw up a cross-sectoral national strategy on alien species was taken in the 2005 white paper on the government’s environmental policy and the state of the environment in Norway (Report No. 21 (2004–2005) to the Storting) and the subsequent debate in the Storting.
This document describes Norway’s goals and principles for dealing with alien species and specific measures that will be implemented in all relevant administrative sectors. The strategy is intended to ensure that there is a common understanding and",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Oomycota,Peronosporea,Peronosporales,Peronosporaceae,Phytophthora,Phytophthora infestans,,potato blight,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,NA,Europe,Norway,NA,NA,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,55000000,,,11092550.77,7279888.653,55000000,11092550.77,7279888.653,NOK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Damage-Loss/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp11: ""Bioforsk concluded that the annual costs of potato blight, including crop yield losses and the costs of eradication and advisory measures, amount to NOK 55–5 million."". There is a typo here - it is not clear what the upper limit is. So lower value taken as the cost estimate.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1763,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Austria,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,56000000,,,84942732.8,73401429.24,56000000,84942732.8,73401429.24,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1764,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,Chinaberry tree/Pride of India/Bead-tree/Cape lilac/Syringa berrytree/Persian lilac/Indian lilac,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Mois savanna biome,4,N,Africa,South Africa,,Mois Savanna Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,56000000,,,7717428.26,15630809.2,3733333.333,514495.2173,1042053.947,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1766,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Asia,Russia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,57100000,,,86611250.77,,57100000,86611250.77,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,
SC1768,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Malacostraca,Decapoda,Carcinidae,Carcinus,Carcinus maenas,,Green crab,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,57509000,46000000,119600000,55111088.06,66685960.7,57509000,55111088.06,66685960.7,CAD,2000,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Andrew Kramer,
SC1769,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Siam weed/Christmas bush/Devil weed/Common floss flower/Triffid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Indian Ocean Coastal Belt biome,5,N,Africa,South Africa,,Indian Ocean Coastal Belt Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,58000000,,,7993050.698,16189052.39,3866666.667,532870.0465,1079270.159,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1773,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Tomato farmers across Humd, Sub-humid, Semi-humid, Semi-humid to Semi arid, and Semi-arid agro-ecological zones of Kenya",12b,N,Africa,Kenya,,Seven Counties (Unspecified),Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,59300000,,,57886084.18,117350467.3,59300000,57886084.18,117350467.3,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production,Justice Tambo,
SC1774,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Mozambique,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,59600000,,,58178931.15,170207736.4,59600000,58178931.15,170207736.4,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1782,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Asia,Turkey,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,64000000,,,97077408.91,,64000000,97077408.91,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,
SC1790,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cereus,Cereus jamacaru,,Queen of the night,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Mois savanna biome,4,N,Africa,South Africa,,Mois Savanna Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,66500000,,,9164446.058,18561585.93,4433333.333,610963.0706,1237439.062,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1791,,vanWilgen2017,"An assessment of the evolution, costs and effectiveness of alien plant control operations in Kruger National Park, South Africa","van Wilgen, B.W., Fill, J.M., Govender, N., Foxcroft, L.C.","Alien plants were first recorded in 1937 in the 2 million ha Kruger National Park (KNP, a savanna protected
area in South Africa), and attempts to control them began in the mid-1950s. The invasive alien plant
control program expanded substantially in the late 1990s, but its overall efficacy has not been determined.
We present an assessment of invasive alien plant control operations over several decades in KNP. We based
our assessment on available information from a range of control programs funded from various sources,
including national public works programs, KNP operational funds, and foreign donor funds. Over ZAR
350 million (~ US$ 27 million) has been spent on control interventions between 1997 and 2016. We
found evidence of good progress with the control of several species, notably Opuntia stricta, Sesbania punicea,
Lantana camara and several aquatic weeds, often because of effective biological control. On the other
hand, we found that over one third (40%) of the funding was spent on species that have subsequently been
recognised as being of lower priority, most of which were alien annual weeds. The allocation of funds to
non-priority species was sometimes driven by the need to meet additional objectives (such as employment
creation), or by perceptions about relative impact in the absence of documented evidence. We also found
that management goals were limited to inputs (funds disbursed, employment created, and area treated)
rather than to ecological outcomes, and progress was consequently not adequately monitored. At a species
level, four out of 36 species were considered to be under complete control, and a further five were under
substantial control. Attempts to control five annual species were all considered to be ineffective.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4,Y,Africa,South Africa,,Kruger National Park,Site,1997-2016,Period,1997,2016,1997,2016,Potentially ongoing,66600000,,,4624096.028,11565905.71,3330000,231204.8014,578295.2853,ZAR,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs and effectiveness of control for selected alien plant taxa in the Kruger National Park (inside and outside combined),Ross Cuthbert,
SC1799,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Bosnia and Herzegovina,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,73000000,,,110728919.5,110768025,73000000,110728919.5,110768025,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1800,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Fungi,Chytridiomycota,Chytridiomycetes,Synchytriales,Synchytriaceae,Synchytrium,Synchytrium endobioticum,,Potato wart fungus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,One-time,73340000,,,65550432.31,83141200.42,73340000,65550432.31,83141200.42,CAD,2001,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"United States Department of Agriculture (2001) Canada trade policy monitoring: the impact of the potato wart on Canadian potato exports. GAIN Report, Foreign Agricultural Service, USA; 19Calculated as 6% of $149,000,000 in Canadian potato exports, not including Prince Edward Island; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (2001) 2000/20001 Canadian potato situations and trends. Canada; 2",Andrew Kramer,
SC1802,,Thompson1990b,Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge on North Dakota Grazing Land,Thompson,,1990,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland (grazing land),4,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,74691000,,,147686691,147686691,74691000,147686691,147686691,USD,1989,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""$75 million in foregone business activity""",Marina Golivets,
SC1803,,Leistritz1992,Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) in North Dakota,Leistritz et al,,1992,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,74691000,,,147686691,147686691,74691000,147686691,147686691,USD,1989,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""reduced business activity for all sectors""; Corrections MG: effective year changed to the publication year of the original publication; Corrections MG: start and end year changed from Unspecified to 1989",Ivan Jaric/Marina Golivets,Yes
SC1805,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Hungary,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,75800000,,,114976056.2,664675.1141,75800000,114976056.2,664675.1141,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1806,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Slovakia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,76000000,,,115279423.1,163541064.3,76000000,115279423.1,163541064.3,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1814,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Zimbabwe,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,83000000,30200000,129300000,81020994.72,114335005.3,83000000,81020994.72,114335005.3,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1815,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Mozambique,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,85100000,30900000,132600000,83070923.5,243031516.3,85100000,83070923.5,243031516.3,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1820,,Wallace1992,Economic impact of leafy spurge on North Dakota wildland,Wallace et al,,1992,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,wildland and grazing lands,NA,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1991,1991,1991,1991,Potentially ongoing,87339000,,,157193900.4,157193900.4,87339000,157193900.4,157193900.4,USD,1991,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""Total regional economic impact (direct plus secondary impacts) from the leafy spurge infestation on wildland and rangeland is estimated at $87.3 million.""; Estimate for rangeland taken from Bangsund1991b",Marina Golivets/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,Yes
SC1821,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Croatia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,88000000,,,133481437.3,25554086.81,88000000,133481437.3,25554086.81,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1828,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Democratic Republic of the Congo,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,92300000,33500000,143700000,90099250.75,149504113.2,92300000,90099250.75,149504113.2,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1830,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Hungary,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,93200000,,,141368976.7,817252.2511,93200000,141368976.7,817252.2511,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Impacts were assessed based on workers who suffer additional allergenic symptoms due to ragweed losing 1.5% of their work productivity, valued according to their national average Gross Value Added per worker.",Marina Golivets,No
SC1831,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia saligna,,Golden wreath wattle/Orange wattle/Blue-leafed wattle/Western Australian golden wattle/Port Jackson,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Fynbos,3,N,Africa,South Africa,,Fynbos Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,93700000,,,12912911.21,26153693.26,6246666.667,860860.7475,1743579.551,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1840,,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,Mack2000,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,New York,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,100000000,,,142345867.2,142345867.2,100000000,142345867.2,142345867.2,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1841,,Cohen1995,Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in a United States Estuary: A Case Study of the Biological Invasions of the San Francisco Bay and Delta,"Cohen AN, Carlton JT",,1995,English,Official report,Pimentel2000,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Teredinidae,Teredo,Teredo navalis,,shipworm,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,Brooklyn Army Terminal,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,100000000,,,169681857.5,169681857.5,100000000,169681857.5,169681857.5,USD,1993,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC1846,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Romania,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,104100000,,,157902472.9,73185099.16,104100000,157902472.9,73185099.16,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1848,,Tumber2014,Pierce’s disease costs California $104 million per year.,Tumber et al.,"Pierce’s disease of grapevines, caused by a strain of the bacteria Xylella fastidiosa, threatens an industry with a farm value of production exceeding $3 billion per year. The grape industry incurs substantial costs from losses of vines to the disease and efforts to mitigate damage. Additional costs are borne by the public in providing programs that aim to contain the disease and develop longer-term solutions, and by the citrus, nursery and grape industries in complying with those programs. Aggregating the costs of vine losses, industry assessments, compliance costs, and expenditures by government entities, we estimate the cost of Pierce’s disease in California is approximately $104.4 million per year. Of that, $48.3 million funds Pierce’s disease activities undertaken by various government agencies, the nursery and citrus industries and the UC system, and $56.1 million is the cost of lost production and vine replacement borne by grape growers",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xylella,Xylella fastidiosa,,Pierce’s disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,vineyards,NA,NA,North America,USA,California,,Site,1 year,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,104400000,,,108097063.7,108097063.7,104400000,108097063.7,108097063.7,USD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,total cost of contro,,
SC1850,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Siam weed/Christmas bush/Devil weed/Common floss flower/Triffid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Mois savanna biome,4,N,Africa,South Africa,,Mois Savanna Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,106100000,,,14621770.33,29614801.01,7073333.333,974784.6885,1974320.067,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1851,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Moldova,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,110000000,,,166851796.6,21656677.73,110000000,166851796.6,21656677.73,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1859,,4,Economic impact of classical biological control of Papaya mealybug in India,"Myrick S, Norton G W, Selvaraj K N, Natarajan K, Muniappan R",,2013,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Pseudococcidae,Paracoccus,Paracoccus marginatus,,papaya mealybug,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Asia,India,,Unspecified,Country,One-time,Period,2010,2014,2010,2014,One-time,121000000,,,136017984.3,438424370.4,24200000,27203596.87,87684874.09,USD,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Health/Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,yes,Benefit from biological control,Achyut Kumar,
SC1860,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Benin,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,121300000,44100000,188900000,118407791.1,318464770.4,121300000,118407791.1,318464770.4,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1878,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Cephalaspidomorphi,Petromyzontiformes,Petromyzontidae,Petromyzon,Petromyzon marinus,,Sea lamprey,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,1980,Year,1980,Unspecified,1980,1980,Potentially ongoing,137500000,110000000,286000000,349792739.7,365497278.8,137500000,349792739.7,365497278.8,CAD,1980,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Andrew Kramer,
SC1881,,Li2002,Invasive Species in China [in Chinese],"Li ZY, Xie Y",In Table 2,2002,Chinese,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Viruses,Orthornavirae,NA,NA,Orthornavirae,Alphainfluenzavirus,Avian influenza,,???,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,Man-made,12,N,Asia,China,,Hong Kong,Site,1997,Year,1997,1997,1997,1997,One-time,140000000,,,27613920.57,,140000000,27613920.57,,HKD,1997,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Most information (except Table 2, which most of the InvaCost data are also extracted from other papers citing this book) is about the ecological impacts of the invasive species",Chunlong Liu/Wen Xiong,Yes
SC1882,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana/Big-sage/Wild-sage/Red-sage/White-sage/Tickberry/West Indian lantana/Umbelanterna,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Mois savanna biome,4,N,Africa,South Africa,,Mois Savanna Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,140400000,,,19348695.14,39188671.65,9360000,1289913.009,2612578.11,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1883,,7870,"An assessment of the effectiveness of a large, national-scale invasive alien plant control strategy in South Africa","van Wilgen, B. W., Forsyth, G. G., Le Maitre, D. C. , Wannenburgh, A., Kotze, J. D. F., van den Berg, E., Henderson, L.","This paper presents an assessment of a large, national-scale alien plant control program that has operated in South Africa for 15 years. We reviewed data from three national-level estimates of the extent of invasion, records of the costs and spatial extent of invasive species control operations, assessments of the effectiveness of biological control, and smaller-scale studies. The 19 most important invasive taxa, mainly trees, in terrestrial biomes were identified. The effectiveness of control efforts on the extent of invasion of these taxa was assessed. Control costs over 15 years amounted to 3.2 billion rands (US$457 million), more than half of which was spent on 10 taxa, the most prominent being in the genera Acacia, Prosopis, Pinus and Eucalyptus. Despite substantial spending, control operations were in many cases applied to a relatively small portion of the estimated invaded area, and invasions appear to have increased, and remain a serious threat, in many biomes. Our findings suggest that South Africa’s national-scale strategy to clear invasive alien plants should be substantially modified if impacts are to be effectively mitigated. Rather than attempting to control all species, and to operate in all areas, a more focused approach is called for. This would include prioritising both the species and the areas, and setting goals and monitoring the degree to which they are achieved, within a framework of adaptive management. A greater portion of funding should also be directed towards biological control, where successes have been most notable.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Fynbos,3,N,Africa,South Africa,,Fynbos Biome,Site,1995-2008,Period,1995,2008,1995,2009,Potentially ongoing,141000000,,,19431381.87,39356144.6,9400000,1295425.458,2623742.974,ZAR,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,They present records of the costs of controlling 18 invasive species during 15 years of the Working for Water program.,Ana Novoa,
SC1888,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Reynoutria,Reynoutria japonica,,Japanese knotweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,development sites,12,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,Year,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,150510000,,,261427741.9,240909690.7,150510000,261427741.9,240909690.7,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Development cost for GB from Table 4.3, pp41 (repeated in Chapter 10). Table also gives cost separately for England/Scotland/Wales. See preceding text for info about impacted sector and type of cost.",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1895,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Maize farmers across agro-ecological zones 1, 2a and 3 of Zambia",12b,N,Africa,Zambia,,Major Maize-growing Agro-ecological Zones,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,159300000,72800000,227600000,155501740.5,426539078.7,159300000,155501740.5,426539078.7,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production,Justice Tambo,
SC1896,,Tomasetto2017,Intensified agriculture favors evolved resistance to biological control,"Tomasetto, F., Tylianakis, J.M., Reale, M., Wratten, S., Goldson, S.L.","Increased regulation of chemical pesticides and rapid evolution of
pesticide resistance have increased calls for sustainable pest
management. Biological control offers sustainable pest suppression,
partly because evolution of resistance to predators and
parasitoids is prevented by several factors (e.g., spatial or temporal
refuges from attacks, reciprocal evolution by control agents,
and contrasting selection pressures from other enemy species).
However, evolution of resistance may become more probable as
agricultural intensification reduces the availability of refuges and
diversity of enemy species, or if control agents have genetic
barriers to evolution. Here we use 21 y of field data from 196 sites
across New Zealand to show that parasitism of a key pasture pest
(Listronotus bonariensis; Argentine stem weevil) by an introduced
parasitoid (Microctonus hyperodae) was initially nationally successful
but then declined by 44% (leading to pasture damage of
c. 160 million New Zealand dollars per annum). This decline was
not attributable to parasitoid numbers released, elevation, or local
climatic variables at sample locations. Rather, in all locations the
decline began 7 y (14 host generations) following parasitoid introduction,
despite releases being staggered across locations in
different years. Finally, we demonstrate experimentally that declining
parasitism rates occurred in ryegrass Lolium perenne,
which is grown nationwide in high-intensity was significantly less
than in adjacent plots of a less-common pasture grass (Lolium
multiflorum), indicating that resistance to parasitism is host
plant–dependent. We conclude that low plant and enemy biodiversity
in intensive large-scale agriculture may facilitate the evolution
of host resistance by pests and threaten the long-term
viability of biological control.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Listronotus,Listronotus bonariensis,,Argentine stem weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,12b,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,2003-2015,Period,2003,2015,2003,2015,Potentially ongoing,160000000,,,113684135.7,108783965.2,12307692.31,8744933.518,8367997.326,NZD,2017,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Here we use 21 y of field data from 196 sites
across New Zealand to show that parasitism of a key pasture pest
(Listronotus bonariensis; Argentine stem weevil) by an introduced
parasitoid (Microctonus hyperodae) was initially nationally successful
but then declined by 44% (leading to pasture damage of
c. 160 million New Zealand dollars per annum). The exact point of this specific decline was unclear in the study, however I used the second breakpoint (12 years, Figure 1) after the introduction of the parasitoid in 1991, as this corroborated ~44%.",Ross Cuthbert,
SC1905,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Ukraine,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,168900000,,,256193349.5,,168900000,256193349.5,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC1906,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,France,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,170000000,,,257861867.4,220180813.6,170000000,257861867.4,220180813.6,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1910,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Bulgaria,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,175000000,,,265446040,272011663.2,175000000,265446040,272011663.2,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1912,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,"Maize farmers across Sudan savanna, Guinea savanna, Transitional zone, Semi deciduous forest, Ran forest and Coastal savanna agro-ecological zones of Ghana",12b,N,Africa,Ghana,,All Agro-ecological Zones,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,177300000,0,267000000,173072558.6,373149938.7,177300000,173072558.6,373149938.7,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production,Justice Tambo,
SC1916,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Cameroon,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,182200000,66200000,283800000,177855725.8,438925270.4,182200000,177855725.8,438925270.4,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1918,,13784,The clearing of invasive alien plants in South Africa: a preliminary assessment of costs and progress,"Marais,C., van Wilgen, B.W. and Stevens, D.","This paper provides estimates of the costs of clearing important species of invasive alien plants, as well as of progress made with clearing, based on data from a recently developed GIS-based project information system. Before the deployment of the system, managers were unable to record, in any detail, information relating to the costs associated with areas cleared at different densities for a range of species. As a result of this, only superficial estimates of the impact of theWorking forWater programme have been possible hitherto. While the system is not yet in full operation, data for about 60% of project expenditure from the 2002/03 financial year were available, and we used this information on which to base our analysis. These data show that the costs of clearing rise sharply with the density of invasion, reaching more that R2000/ha in some cases. These amounts do not include expenditure on herbicides, which can reach over R1000/ha for dense infestations of sprouting species. A large proportion (57%) of the costs was incurred in clearing large trees, which are perceived to have a significant influence on water resources. Large sums were also justifiably spent on species that probably are not substantial water users, including lantana, triffid weed and cacti. These plants affect biodiversity, catchment stability, and the agricultural potential of land. Some of the species on which large amounts have been spent, however, are arguably not a priority. Good progress has been made with clearing certain species. At current rates of clearing, however, many other species will not be brought under control within the next half century. This underscores both the importance of biological control as a sustainable, effective and inexpensive solution to the most intractable of the invasive alien plant problems, and the need for landowners to share the responsibility for clearing. Our estimates are preliminary, given the incomplete data on the project management system, and should be treated as such.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Cereus,Cereus jamacaru,,Queen of the night cactus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,2002-2003,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,187980000,,,37764537.63,71381599.09,187980000,37764537.63,71381599.09,ZAR,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Raw costs = Costs of initial clearing + Costs of follow-up + Cost of herbicides,Desika Moodley,
SC1919,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Italy,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,190000000,,,288198557.7,272900220.3,190000000,288198557.7,272900220.3,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1920,,Cusack2009,The Economics of Invasive Species,"Cusack, Chris, Michael Harte, and Samuel Chan","The prevention, eradication, and control of invasive species is an economic and policy issue and has less to do with biology and ecology than many people involved in managing natural resources realize. Invasive species were introduced into the United States as a result of trade, commerce, and the fulfillment of cultural needs. Decisions about agricultural production, conversion of land from forest to fields to towns, the growth of trade and tourism, and the choice of introduced species for food production, garden ornamentals, and for hunting and fishing are among the fundamental economic drivers of the invasive species problem. Economics provides us with many of the tools we need to understand the drivers of the invasive species problem and inform managers and policymakers about the costs of invasive species and the costs and benefits of different prevention, eradication, and control measures. Studies have been carried out to estimate the economic effects of invasive species and their management on natural resources. These have been particularly focused on forest or agricultural production losses and control costs, but the economic impacts on ecosystem functioning and human health have been less well studied at both state and national levels. Examples of estimates of the annual cost of invasive species in the U.S. and Oregon (in 2008 dollars) are shown in the chart below. Although these studies provide policymakers with important information with which to make decisions, inconsistency in study methodologies limits the usability and comparability of these studies in making policy decisions. A much wider role for economics is needed that goes beyond financial analyses of agricultural or timber production losses and control costs and embraces measures of the impact of invasive species on total economic value and the consequences of the loss or impairment of ecosystem services for the economic well-being of Oregon. Early detection and rapid response (EDRR) and prevention are among the most cost-efficient and -effective ways of reducing the costs of invasive species. Education is a primary process driving EDRR and prevention. Enhanced education of the public, government agencies, industry, and nongovernmental organizations is needed to strengthen all links in the invasive species management chain.",2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Chromista,Oomycota,Peronosporea,Peronosporales,Peronosporaceae,Phytophthora,Phytophthora ramorum,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,NA,North America,USA,Oregon,Southwest Oregon,Site,Year,Year,Unspecified,2009,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,195500000,81000000,310000000,222574649.8,222574649.8,195500000,222574649.8,222574649.8,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Forestry,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp10: ""The potential loss to the nursery industry and forests from SOD is estimated to be between $81 million and $310 million per year (for direct control, management, and regulatory compliance costs plus loss of markets)."" Mentions ""potential"", but I think this is an estimate of the observed cost (so Implementation = Observed). Spatial scale is unclear, but assume Southwest Oregon because of title of case study.",Nigel Taylor,
SC1922,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Uganda,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,198500000,72100000,309200000,193767077.7,625860825.1,198500000,193767077.7,625860825.1,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1924,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Asia,Russia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,203000000,,,307917406.4,,203000000,307917406.4,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,
SC1929,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Fungi,Chytridiomycota,Chytridiomycetes,Synchytriales,Synchytriaceae,Synchytrium,Synchytrium endobioticum,,Potato wart fungus,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2001,Year,2001,Unspecified,2001,2001,Potentially ongoing,216000000,172800000,449280000,193058268,244866366.1,216000000,193058268,244866366.1,CAD,2001,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Andrew Kramer,
SC1932,TC,NME2007,Strategy on Invasive Alien Species,Norwegian Ministry of the Environment,"[First page of text] CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The introduction of invasive alien species is considered to be one of the most serious threats to global biodiversity. Alien species can also have substantial economic and social impacts.
People have moved plant and animal species to new areas throughout history: often, this has been for our own benefit, to use them as agricultural crops or livestock. In many cases, the consequences of such introductions have been mainly positive or neutral.
More recently, there has been a considerable rise in introductions of alien species, particularly as a result of changes in international patterns of transport and trade. This has resulted in growing awareness of the negative impacts certain species can have when they are introduced outside their natural distribution ranges.
In Norway, too, the introduction and spread of invasive alien species is a serious and growing threat to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and has already inflicted heavy costs on society.
Dealing with alien species involves a complex set of challenges. Most introduced species are not able to survive and spread in the wild. Others become established without harming the ecosystems where they are introduced. But some species both become established and cause significant damage to ecosystems, for example by displacing native species or spreading disease. These are known as invasive alien species, and they can have very serious negative impacts, both on ecosystems and biodiversity and on industries such as agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture that are based on the use of these ecosystems.
Measures to address the problem of invasive alien species in Norway will also be important in efforts to achieve the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010. Under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Norway has undertaken as far as possible and as appropriate to prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.
Many different bodies in a range of administrative sectors are responsible for action to address the problem of alien species and for administration and enforcement of legislation relating to the introduction, spread, and management and control of alien species. Effective action to reduce the threat from alien species therefore requires targeted and coordinated cross-sectoral efforts. The decision to draw up a cross-sectoral national strategy on alien species was taken in the 2005 white paper on the government’s environmental policy and the state of the environment in Norway (Report No. 21 (2004–2005) to the Storting) and the subsequent debate in the Storting.
This document describes Norway’s goals and principles for dealing with alien species and specific measures that will be implemented in all relevant administrative sectors. The strategy is intended to ensure that there is a common understanding and",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Platyhelminthes,Monogenea,Gyrodactylidea,Gyrodactylidae,Gyrodactylus,Gyrodactylus salaris,,salmon fluke,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Norwegian river systems,11,NA,Europe,Norway,NA,NA,Country,Year,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,225000000,200000000,250000000,45378616.79,29781362.67,225000000,45378616.79,29781362.67,NOK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"NOTE OVERLAP WITH OTHER GYRODACTYLUS COST FROM THIS SOURCE. pp10 and pp19: ""Gyrodactylus now causes annual losses in the order of NOK 200–250 million in Norwegian river systems."" No citation for cost estimate. ""The annual losses caused by Gyrodactylus in Norwegian rivers are in the order of NOK 200–250 million, and consist mainly of lost income from salmon fishing in infected rivers, lost income from salmon fishing in neighbouring fjords, and loss of the substantial economic spin-off benefits from salmon fishing.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC1950,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Malawi,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,253500000,92100000,394900000,247455688.7,833115859.4,253500000,247455688.7,833115859.4,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1953,,,Modelling the economic impact of yellow bristle grass (Setaria pumila) on a Waikato dairy farm.,"Tozer KN, James TK, Brier B",,2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,No,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Setaria,Setaria helvola,,yellow bristle grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4b\12b,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,North Island,Unit (Island),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,Potentially ongoing,258000000,,,221610282.8,185417407.8,258000000,221610282.8,185417407.8,NZD,2014,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,based on extrapolation from a Farmax model based on a Waikato dairy farm,,
SC1955,WoS,DeGrotte2003,Economic impact of biological control of water hyacinth in Southern Benin,De Groote et al.,"A biological control program of water hyacinth was undertaken in Southern Benin between 1991 and 1993. It consisted of the release of three natural enemies, two weevil species and one moth, that feed exclusively on water hyacinth. In 1999, a survey of 365 men and women from 192 households in 24 villages in the target area, using participatory and quantitative methods, revealed that water hyacinth, although not eliminated, was perceived by the villagers as having been reduced from a serious pest to one of minor or moderate importance. According to their estimates of the impacts they perceived, at the peak of the infestation water hyacinth had reduced the yearly income of this population of about 200 000 by approximately US$84 million. Lost revenues for men were mostly in fishing, while women experienced lost revenues in trade, primarily food crops and fish. The reduction of water hyacinth cover through biological control was credited with an increase in income of US$30.5 million per year. The total cost of the control program is estimated at a present value of US$2.09 million. Assuming the benefits are to stay constant over the next 20 years, a most conservative assumption, the accumulated present value would be US$260 million, yielding a respectable benefit cost ratio of 124:1. This ratio is calculated for direct economic effects on the people of Southern Benin only, and does not take into account indirect benefits or the benefits of the project to other countries were the biological control agents were successfully introduced. Other effects mentioned, but not measured, included an increase of water quality and of human health",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Pontederiales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Wetlands,10,N,Africa,Benin,,Southern Benin,Site,20 years (since 1999),Period,1999,2019,1999,2019,One-time,260000000,,,382596978.3,1196201646,12380952.38,18218903.73,56961983.15,USD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Avoided costs,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Costs of biological control vs. estimated benefits. For a period of 20 years, benefit-cost ratio = 124:1. The 2,090000 USD is the present value of the cost of a biological control program over a 20 year period. 
The yearly income loss due to water hyacinth is 84000000 USD. The benefit from the biological control program is estimated as 260,000000 over  20 year period.",Justice Tambo,
SC1965,,13784,The clearing of invasive alien plants in South Africa: a preliminary assessment of costs and progress,"Marais,C., van Wilgen, B.W. and Stevens, D.","This paper provides estimates of the costs of clearing important species of invasive alien plants, as well as of progress made with clearing, based on data from a recently developed GIS-based project information system. Before the deployment of the system, managers were unable to record, in any detail, information relating to the costs associated with areas cleared at different densities for a range of species. As a result of this, only superficial estimates of the impact of theWorking forWater programme have been possible hitherto. While the system is not yet in full operation, data for about 60% of project expenditure from the 2002/03 financial year were available, and we used this information on which to base our analysis. These data show that the costs of clearing rise sharply with the density of invasion, reaching more that R2000/ha in some cases. These amounts do not include expenditure on herbicides, which can reach over R1000/ha for dense infestations of sprouting species. A large proportion (57%) of the costs was incurred in clearing large trees, which are perceived to have a significant influence on water resources. Large sums were also justifiably spent on species that probably are not substantial water users, including lantana, triffid weed and cacti. These plants affect biodiversity, catchment stability, and the agricultural potential of land. Some of the species on which large amounts have been spent, however, are arguably not a priority. Good progress has been made with clearing certain species. At current rates of clearing, however, many other species will not be brought under control within the next half century. This underscores both the importance of biological control as a sustainable, effective and inexpensive solution to the most intractable of the invasive alien plant problems, and the need for landowners to share the responsibility for clearing. Our estimates are preliminary, given the incomplete data on the project management system, and should be treated as such.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,2002-2003,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,287140000,,,57685441.72,109035601.5,287140000,57685441.72,109035601.5,ZAR,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Raw costs = Costs of initial clearing + Costs of follow-up + Cost of herbicides,Desika Moodley,
SC1970,GS,303,Economic Dimensions of Invasive Species,Evans,-,2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xanthomonas,Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri,,"Citrus canker, Citrus bacterial canker",Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,NA,North America,USA,Florida,Florida,Site,1996-2003,Period,1996,2003,1996,2003,One-time,300000000,,,399742015.9,399742015.9,37500000,49967751.98,49967751.98,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Eradication,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Since 1996, the state of Florida has spent in excess of $300 million dollars trying to eradicate citrus canker.",Melina Kouranditou/Elena Angulo,Yes
SC1973,,Tumber2014,Pierce’s disease costs California $104 million per year.,Tumber et al.,"Pierce’s disease of grapevines, caused by a strain of the bacteria Xylella fastidiosa, threatens an industry with a farm value of production exceeding $3 billion per year. The grape industry incurs substantial costs from losses of vines to the disease and efforts to mitigate damage. Additional costs are borne by the public in providing programs that aim to contain the disease and develop longer-term solutions, and by the citrus, nursery and grape industries in complying with those programs. Aggregating the costs of vine losses, industry assessments, compliance costs, and expenditures by government entities, we estimate the cost of Pierce’s disease in California is approximately $104.4 million per year. Of that, $48.3 million funds Pierce’s disease activities undertaken by various government agencies, the nursery and citrus industries and the UC system, and $56.1 million is the cost of lost production and vine replacement borne by grape growers",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xylella,Xylella fastidiosa,,Pierce’s disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,vineyards,NA,NA,North America,USA,California,,Site,11 years,Period,1999,2010,1999,2010,One-time,303000000,,,445872632.4,445872632.4,25250000,37156052.7,37156052.7,USD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Funding,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,funding for PD-related programs,,
SC1979,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Serbia,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,339000000,,,514206900.3,10170045.47,339000000,514206900.3,10170045.47,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC1985,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Ethiopia,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,351000000,127500000,546600000,342630953.6,942503341.1,351000000,342630953.6,942503341.1,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC1986,,13784,The clearing of invasive alien plants in South Africa: a preliminary assessment of costs and progress,"Marais,C., van Wilgen, B.W. and Stevens, D.","This paper provides estimates of the costs of clearing important species of invasive alien plants, as well as of progress made with clearing, based on data from a recently developed GIS-based project information system. Before the deployment of the system, managers were unable to record, in any detail, information relating to the costs associated with areas cleared at different densities for a range of species. As a result of this, only superficial estimates of the impact of theWorking forWater programme have been possible hitherto. While the system is not yet in full operation, data for about 60% of project expenditure from the 2002/03 financial year were available, and we used this information on which to base our analysis. These data show that the costs of clearing rise sharply with the density of invasion, reaching more that R2000/ha in some cases. These amounts do not include expenditure on herbicides, which can reach over R1000/ha for dense infestations of sprouting species. A large proportion (57%) of the costs was incurred in clearing large trees, which are perceived to have a significant influence on water resources. Large sums were also justifiably spent on species that probably are not substantial water users, including lantana, triffid weed and cacti. These plants affect biodiversity, catchment stability, and the agricultural potential of land. Some of the species on which large amounts have been spent, however, are arguably not a priority. Good progress has been made with clearing certain species. At current rates of clearing, however, many other species will not be brought under control within the next half century. This underscores both the importance of biological control as a sustainable, effective and inexpensive solution to the most intractable of the invasive alien plant problems, and the need for landowners to share the responsibility for clearing. Our estimates are preliminary, given the incomplete data on the project management system, and should be treated as such.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Meliaceae,Melia,Melia azedarach,,Syringas,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,2002-2003,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,353290000,,,70974749.97,134154724.7,353290000,70974749.97,134154724.7,ZAR,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Raw costs = Costs of initial clearing + Costs of follow-up + Cost of herbicides,Desika Moodley,
SC1999,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Tanzania,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,399100000,145000000,621600000,389584084.2,1189784444,399100000,389584084.2,1189784444,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC2004,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Hungary,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,436000000,,,661339848.2,3823197.226,436000000,661339848.2,3823197.226,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC2008,GS,,Tomato leafminer (Tuta absoluta): Impacts and coping strategies for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,"The recently introduced tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, has become the most important pest constraint to tomato production in Africa. Spreading at an average 800 km/year, it is now present in 41 African countries. The socio-economic impacts of Tuta absoluta were assessed through a household survey in Kenya and Zambia in 2018, covering 400 respondents in Kenya and 426 in Zambia. We found that 97.9% of farmers in Zambia, and 99% in Kenya reported Tuta absoluta as the main problem on tomato. A majority of farmers in Zambia (57%) had lost a large proportion of their crop to Tuta absoluta, compared to 41% in Kenya. Mean seasonal production loss based on farmers’ own estimates was 114,000 tonnes for Kenya and 10,700 tonnes for Zambia, equivalent to US$ 59.3, and US$ 8.7 million in economic losses respectively. Pesticides were the predominant control method for Tuta absoluta, used by 96.5% of farmers in Kenya and 97.6% of farmers in Zambia, with 6.4% using highly toxic products. However, only 27.2% and 17.2% of farmers in Kenya and Zambia, respectively, indicated the pesticide treatments were very successful. In Kenya, 73.1% of farmers applied 1-5 sprays/season, and in Zambia 29.2% applied 1-5 sprays, and 33.9% applied 6-10. The average amount spent on pesticides per household against Tuta absoluta was US$ 47.2 in Kenya, about US$ 33.7/ha, while in Zambia, this cost was US$ 42.1 per household, and US$ 9.4/ha. The average cost for a pesticide application against Tuta absoluta in Kenya was US$ 12.3, and US$ 4.2 in Zambia. The implications of these findings for sustainable management of this pest are discussed.",2019,English,Working paper,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer or Tuta absoluta,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Nigeria,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,495700000,,,483880808.2,1346098318,495700000,483880808.2,1346098318,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to tomato production. Based on extrapolation of perceived farmer losses from similar agro-ecological zones across Kenya and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC2010,TC,NME2007,Strategy on Invasive Alien Species,Norwegian Ministry of the Environment,"[First page of text] CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The introduction of invasive alien species is considered to be one of the most serious threats to global biodiversity. Alien species can also have substantial economic and social impacts.
People have moved plant and animal species to new areas throughout history: often, this has been for our own benefit, to use them as agricultural crops or livestock. In many cases, the consequences of such introductions have been mainly positive or neutral.
More recently, there has been a considerable rise in introductions of alien species, particularly as a result of changes in international patterns of transport and trade. This has resulted in growing awareness of the negative impacts certain species can have when they are introduced outside their natural distribution ranges.
In Norway, too, the introduction and spread of invasive alien species is a serious and growing threat to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and has already inflicted heavy costs on society.
Dealing with alien species involves a complex set of challenges. Most introduced species are not able to survive and spread in the wild. Others become established without harming the ecosystems where they are introduced. But some species both become established and cause significant damage to ecosystems, for example by displacing native species or spreading disease. These are known as invasive alien species, and they can have very serious negative impacts, both on ecosystems and biodiversity and on industries such as agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture that are based on the use of these ecosystems.
Measures to address the problem of invasive alien species in Norway will also be important in efforts to achieve the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010. Under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Norway has undertaken as far as possible and as appropriate to prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.
Many different bodies in a range of administrative sectors are responsible for action to address the problem of alien species and for administration and enforcement of legislation relating to the introduction, spread, and management and control of alien species. Effective action to reduce the threat from alien species therefore requires targeted and coordinated cross-sectoral efforts. The decision to draw up a cross-sectoral national strategy on alien species was taken in the 2005 white paper on the government’s environmental policy and the state of the environment in Norway (Report No. 21 (2004–2005) to the Storting) and the subsequent debate in the Storting.
This document describes Norway’s goals and principles for dealing with alien species and specific measures that will be implemented in all relevant administrative sectors. The strategy is intended to ensure that there is a common understanding and",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Thysanoptera,Thripidae,Frankliniella,Frankliniella occidentalis,,western flower thrip,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,NA,Europe,Norway,NA,NA,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,509000000,436000000,582000000,102656515.3,67372060.45,509000000,102656515.3,67372060.45,NOK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Communication/Damage-Loss/Eradication,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp11: ""For the western flower thrips, the annual costs are between NOK 436 and 582 million, given yield losses of 30–0%.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC2012,,Tumber2014,Pierce’s disease costs California $104 million per year.,Tumber et al.,"Pierce’s disease of grapevines, caused by a strain of the bacteria Xylella fastidiosa, threatens an industry with a farm value of production exceeding $3 billion per year. The grape industry incurs substantial costs from losses of vines to the disease and efforts to mitigate damage. Additional costs are borne by the public in providing programs that aim to contain the disease and develop longer-term solutions, and by the citrus, nursery and grape industries in complying with those programs. Aggregating the costs of vine losses, industry assessments, compliance costs, and expenditures by government entities, we estimate the cost of Pierce’s disease in California is approximately $104.4 million per year. Of that, $48.3 million funds Pierce’s disease activities undertaken by various government agencies, the nursery and citrus industries and the UC system, and $56.1 million is the cost of lost production and vine replacement borne by grape growers",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Xanthomonadales,Xanthomonadaceae,Xylella,Xylella fastidiosa,,Pierce’s disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,vineyards,NA,NA,North America,USA,California,,Site,11 years,Period,1999,2010,1999,2010,One-time,544000000,,,800510600.8,800510600.8,45333333.33,66709216.74,66709216.74,USD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,PD and GWSS programs,,
SC2018,,13784,The clearing of invasive alien plants in South Africa: a preliminary assessment of costs and progress,"Marais,C., van Wilgen, B.W. and Stevens, D.","This paper provides estimates of the costs of clearing important species of invasive alien plants, as well as of progress made with clearing, based on data from a recently developed GIS-based project information system. Before the deployment of the system, managers were unable to record, in any detail, information relating to the costs associated with areas cleared at different densities for a range of species. As a result of this, only superficial estimates of the impact of theWorking forWater programme have been possible hitherto. While the system is not yet in full operation, data for about 60% of project expenditure from the 2002/03 financial year were available, and we used this information on which to base our analysis. These data show that the costs of clearing rise sharply with the density of invasion, reaching more that R2000/ha in some cases. These amounts do not include expenditure on herbicides, which can reach over R1000/ha for dense infestations of sprouting species. A large proportion (57%) of the costs was incurred in clearing large trees, which are perceived to have a significant influence on water resources. Large sums were also justifiably spent on species that probably are not substantial water users, including lantana, triffid weed and cacti. These plants affect biodiversity, catchment stability, and the agricultural potential of land. Some of the species on which large amounts have been spent, however, are arguably not a priority. Good progress has been made with clearing certain species. At current rates of clearing, however, many other species will not be brought under control within the next half century. This underscores both the importance of biological control as a sustainable, effective and inexpensive solution to the most intractable of the invasive alien plant problems, and the need for landowners to share the responsibility for clearing. Our estimates are preliminary, given the incomplete data on the project management system, and should be treated as such.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Country,2002-2003,Year,2002,2003,2002,2003,Potentially ongoing,587990000,,,118125175.4,223277297.9,587990000,118125175.4,223277297.9,ZAR,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Raw costs = Costs of initial clearing + Costs of follow-up + Cost of herbicides,Desika Moodley,
SC2022,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Romania,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,657000000,,,996560275.9,461888666.2,657000000,996560275.9,461888666.2,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC2023,,,Seasonal dynamics of ground cover in Cirsium arvense – a basis for estimating grazing losses and economic impacts,"Bourdot GW, Hurrell GA, Trolove M, Saville DJ",,2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,Saunders et al 2017,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Cirsium,Cirsium arvense,,californian thistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,4b\12b,N,Oceania,New Zealand,,New Zealand,Country,2011-12,Year,2011,2012,2011,2012,Potentially ongoing,685000000,,,487002491.1,475999845.9,685000000,487002491.1,475999845.9,NZD,2016,Publication year,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Annual estimate broken down by livestock sector (dairy/meat/deer at 446/233/6). A cost of all pastoral weeds to NZ of 1.2billionNZD (Bourdot et al 2007) likely an underestimate given thistle alone estimated at haf this value,,
SC2031,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,arable land,12b,N,Europe,Ukraine,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,823000000,,,1248354805,,823000000,1248354805,,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted area of cropland subject to invasion by ragweed. Costs were calculated for residual loss of crop yields (assuming a 25% loss of crop yield for crops invaded by ragweed),Marina Golivets,No
SC2033,GS,,Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa,Rwomushana et al.,,2018,English,Official report,"Abrahams P, Bateman M, Beale T, Clottey V, Cock M, Colmenarez Y, Corniani N, Day R, Early R, Godwin JL, Gomez J, Gonzalez-Moreno P, Murphy ST, Oppong-Mensah B, Phiri N, Pratt C, Richards G, Silvestri S, Witt A (2017). Fall Armyworm: Impacts and implications for Africa (September 2017), CABI, UK.",Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Noctuidae,Spodoptera,Spodoptera frugiperda,,Fall armyworm,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,12b,N,Africa,Nigeria,,Unspecified,Country,2018,Year,2018,2018,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,877600000,318900000,1366900000,856674999.6,2383167005,877600000,856674999.6,2383167005,USD,2018,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,The cost estimate is for economic loss to maize production. Extrapolated based on cost estimates from similar agro-ecological zones across Ghana and Zambia,Justice Tambo,
SC2046,,Cusack2009,The Economics of Invasive Species,"Cusack, Chris, Michael Harte, and Samuel Chan","The prevention, eradication, and control of invasive species is an economic and policy issue and has less to do with biology and ecology than many people involved in managing natural resources realize. Invasive species were introduced into the United States as a result of trade, commerce, and the fulfillment of cultural needs. Decisions about agricultural production, conversion of land from forest to fields to towns, the growth of trade and tourism, and the choice of introduced species for food production, garden ornamentals, and for hunting and fishing are among the fundamental economic drivers of the invasive species problem. Economics provides us with many of the tools we need to understand the drivers of the invasive species problem and inform managers and policymakers about the costs of invasive species and the costs and benefits of different prevention, eradication, and control measures. Studies have been carried out to estimate the economic effects of invasive species and their management on natural resources. These have been particularly focused on forest or agricultural production losses and control costs, but the economic impacts on ecosystem functioning and human health have been less well studied at both state and national levels. Examples of estimates of the annual cost of invasive species in the U.S. and Oregon (in 2008 dollars) are shown in the chart below. Although these studies provide policymakers with important information with which to make decisions, inconsistency in study methodologies limits the usability and comparability of these studies in making policy decisions. A much wider role for economics is needed that goes beyond financial analyses of agricultural or timber production losses and control costs and embraces measures of the impact of invasive species on total economic value and the consequences of the loss or impairment of ecosystem services for the economic well-being of Oregon. Early detection and rapid response (EDRR) and prevention are among the most cost-efficient and -effective ways of reducing the costs of invasive species. Education is a primary process driving EDRR and prevention. Enhanced education of the public, government agencies, industry, and nongovernmental organizations is needed to strengthen all links in the invasive species management chain.",2009,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,10\11,NA,North America,USA,,NA,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2009,2009,Potentially ongoing,1120000000,,,1275107968,1275107968,1120000000,1275107968,1275107968,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,No,"Table 2: Zebra mussels (U.S.) Damage to infrastructure, control costs",Nigel Taylor,
SC2058,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Fungi,Basidiomycota,Pucciniomycetes,Pucciniales,Cronartiaceae,Cronartium,Cronartium ribicola,,White pine blister rust,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,1,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,1932690000,1546152000,4019995000,1727415667,2190975820,1932690000,1727415667,2190975820,CAD,2001,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Andrew Kramer,
SC2072,TC,NME2007,Strategy on Invasive Alien Species,Norwegian Ministry of the Environment,"[First page of text] CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
The introduction of invasive alien species is considered to be one of the most serious threats to global biodiversity. Alien species can also have substantial economic and social impacts.
People have moved plant and animal species to new areas throughout history: often, this has been for our own benefit, to use them as agricultural crops or livestock. In many cases, the consequences of such introductions have been mainly positive or neutral.
More recently, there has been a considerable rise in introductions of alien species, particularly as a result of changes in international patterns of transport and trade. This has resulted in growing awareness of the negative impacts certain species can have when they are introduced outside their natural distribution ranges.
In Norway, too, the introduction and spread of invasive alien species is a serious and growing threat to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and has already inflicted heavy costs on society.
Dealing with alien species involves a complex set of challenges. Most introduced species are not able to survive and spread in the wild. Others become established without harming the ecosystems where they are introduced. But some species both become established and cause significant damage to ecosystems, for example by displacing native species or spreading disease. These are known as invasive alien species, and they can have very serious negative impacts, both on ecosystems and biodiversity and on industries such as agriculture, fisheries and aquaculture that are based on the use of these ecosystems.
Measures to address the problem of invasive alien species in Norway will also be important in efforts to achieve the target of halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010. Under the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Norway has undertaken as far as possible and as appropriate to prevent the introduction of, control or eradicate those alien species which threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.
Many different bodies in a range of administrative sectors are responsible for action to address the problem of alien species and for administration and enforcement of legislation relating to the introduction, spread, and management and control of alien species. Effective action to reduce the threat from alien species therefore requires targeted and coordinated cross-sectoral efforts. The decision to draw up a cross-sectoral national strategy on alien species was taken in the 2005 white paper on the government’s environmental policy and the state of the environment in Norway (Report No. 21 (2004–2005) to the Storting) and the subsequent debate in the Storting.
This document describes Norway’s goals and principles for dealing with alien species and specific measures that will be implemented in all relevant administrative sectors. The strategy is intended to ensure that there is a common understanding and",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Platyhelminthes,Monogenea,Gyrodactylidea,Gyrodactylidae,Gyrodactylus,Gyrodactylus salaris,,salmon fluke,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Norwegian river systems,11,NA,Europe,Norway,NA,NA,Country,30 years,Period,1977,2007,1977,2007,Potentially ongoing,3500000000,3000000000,4000000000,705889594.5,463265641.6,112903225.8,22770632.08,14944052.95,NOK,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment/Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"NOTE OVERLAP WITH OTHER GYRODACTYLUS COST FROM THIS SOURCE. pp19: ""The annual losses caused by Gyrodactylus in Norwegian rivers are in the order of NOK 200–250 million, and consist mainly of lost income from salmon fishing in infected rivers, lost income from salmon fishing in neighbouring fjords, and loss of the substantial economic spin-off benefits from salmon fishing. A rough estimate suggests that Norway’s losses since the introduction of Gyrodactylus salaris 30 years ago are in the order of NOK 3–4 billion.""",Nigel Taylor,No
SC2081,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,Leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,4b,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,1999,Year,1999,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,5744500000,4595600000,11948560000,5689680630,7098685711,5744500000,5689680630,7098685711,CAD,1999,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Andrew Kramer,
SC2084,TC,Colautti2006,Characterised and projected costs of nonindigenous species in Canada,"Colautti, R. I., Bailey, S. A., Van Overdijk, C. D. A., Amundsen, K., & MacIsaac, H. J.",,2006,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Leotiomycetes,Helotiales,Helotiaceae,Gremmeniella,Gremmeniella abietina,,Scleroderris canker,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,1,N,North America,Canada,,Unspecified,Country,2002,Year,2002,Unspecified,2002,2002,Potentially ongoing,6629120000,5303296000,13095212000,5925029749,7515039467,6629120000,5925029749,7515039467,CAD,2001,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Extrapolations from small-scale, short-term studies to estimate country-wide annual impacts. They applied conservative assumptions to offset this upscaling bias (e.g. no indirect and non-market costs estimated). The original estimation for Ceutorhynchus obstrictus is based on a personnal communication.",Andrew Kramer,
SC2117,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2006-2013,Year,2006,2013,2006,2013,One-time,109000,,,132535.4119,248992.4881,109000,132535.4119,248992.4881,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs for research and development on biological control,Desika Moodley,
SC2120,,DehnenSchmutz2004,Controlling Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles: an economic analysis,"Dehnen-Schmutz,  K.,  Perrings,  C. and Williamson,  M.","What resources should be committed to the control of invasive species? This study is based on a survey of nature conservation and forestry authorities, wildlife trusts and private landowners which investigated the extent of the ecological and economic impacts of the invasive nonnative plant Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles. There are data on 52,000 ha of land affected by R. ponticum, more than 30,000 ha of it in nature reserves. For nearly all nature reserves, displacement of native species and habitat changes were both reported. In 2001, respondents controlled 1275 ha of R. ponticum at a cost of £670,924. To test the optimality of this, we apply a model of social expenditure. The external costs of R. ponticum control are estimated from the probability that it will spread to contiguous sites and the damage done on invaded sites. These are then used to calculate the socially optimal level of expenditure on R. ponticum control, and the funding gap it identified by comparing the result with current levels of expenditure. The results suggest that a socially optimal level of control effort requires a significant increase in social funding for R. ponticum control, although the size of the increase varies between landholders.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,rhododendron,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,Europe,United Kingdom/Ireland,,United Kingdom & Ireland,Unit (103.01 ha),2001,Year,2000,2001,2000,2001,Potentially ongoing,134813,,,320317.2678,,134813,320317.2678,,GBP,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC2121,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2007,Year,2007,2007,2007,2007,One-time,138900,,,168891.4561,317294.0973,138900,168891.4561,317294.0973,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs for recurrent rearing, releasing, & monitoring of biological control",Desika Moodley,
SC2123,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Oceania,Australia,,Australia,Site,1975,Year,1975,1990,1975,1990,One-time,181500,,,326666.1277,311120.8978,181500,326666.1277,311120.8978,USD,1991,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs for research and development on biological control,Desika Moodley,
SC2125,,Pimentel2009,Invasive plants: their role in species extinctions and economic losses to agriculture in the USA,"Pimentel, D.","The more than 50,000 species of plants, animals, and microbes introduced into the United States cause more extinction of native species than most any other threats and cause more than $120 billion in damages and control costs each year. An assessment of the invasive plants that have been introduced and their control and damage costs will be estimated.
",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,"Campbell FT (1994). Killer pigs, vines, and fungi: alien species threaten native ecosystems. Endang Species Tech Bull 19:3–5",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea solstitialis,,Yellow starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,productive grassland,4,NA,North America,USA,California,Northern California,Unit (4 million Ha),1 year,Year,1994,1994,1994,1994,One-time,200000000,,,330739866.2,330739866.2,200000000,330739866.2,330739866.2,USD,1994,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,total loss of this once productive grassland,,
SC2126,,DehnenSchmutz2004,Controlling Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles: an economic analysis,"Dehnen-Schmutz,  K.,  Perrings,  C. and Williamson,  M.","What resources should be committed to the control of invasive species? This study is based on a survey of nature conservation and forestry authorities, wildlife trusts and private landowners which investigated the extent of the ecological and economic impacts of the invasive nonnative plant Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles. There are data on 52,000 ha of land affected by R. ponticum, more than 30,000 ha of it in nature reserves. For nearly all nature reserves, displacement of native species and habitat changes were both reported. In 2001, respondents controlled 1275 ha of R. ponticum at a cost of £670,924. To test the optimality of this, we apply a model of social expenditure. The external costs of R. ponticum control are estimated from the probability that it will spread to contiguous sites and the damage done on invaded sites. These are then used to calculate the socially optimal level of expenditure on R. ponticum control, and the funding gap it identified by comparing the result with current levels of expenditure. The results suggest that a socially optimal level of control effort requires a significant increase in social funding for R. ponticum control, although the size of the increase varies between landholders.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,rhododendron,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,Europe,United Kingdom/Ireland,,United Kingdom & Ireland,Unit (146.72 ha),2001,Year,2000,2001,2000,2001,Potentially ongoing,228098,,,541963.5209,,228098,541963.5209,,GBP,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC2127,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Chromolaena,Chromolaena odorata,,Triffid weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2000-2007,Year,2000,2007,2000,2007,One-time,231000,,,280877.7996,527681.328,231000,280877.7996,527681.328,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs for research and development (including salaries and overheads) on biological control,Desika Moodley,
SC2128,,DehnenSchmutz2004,Controlling Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles: an economic analysis,"Dehnen-Schmutz,  K.,  Perrings,  C. and Williamson,  M.","What resources should be committed to the control of invasive species? This study is based on a survey of nature conservation and forestry authorities, wildlife trusts and private landowners which investigated the extent of the ecological and economic impacts of the invasive nonnative plant Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles. There are data on 52,000 ha of land affected by R. ponticum, more than 30,000 ha of it in nature reserves. For nearly all nature reserves, displacement of native species and habitat changes were both reported. In 2001, respondents controlled 1275 ha of R. ponticum at a cost of £670,924. To test the optimality of this, we apply a model of social expenditure. The external costs of R. ponticum control are estimated from the probability that it will spread to contiguous sites and the damage done on invaded sites. These are then used to calculate the socially optimal level of expenditure on R. ponticum control, and the funding gap it identified by comparing the result with current levels of expenditure. The results suggest that a socially optimal level of control effort requires a significant increase in social funding for R. ponticum control, although the size of the increase varies between landholders.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,rhododendron,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,Europe,United Kingdom/Ireland,,United Kingdom & Ireland,Unit(1003.10 ha),2001,Year,2000,2001,2000,2001,Potentially ongoing,247880,,,588965.7847,,247880,588965.7847,,GBP,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC2132,,Kaplan2012,Distribution and management of Acacia implexa (Benth.) in South Africa: A suitable target for eradication?,"Kaplan, H., Van Zyl, H.W.F., Le Roux, J.J., Richardson, D.M. and Wilson, J.R.U.","This study is the first detailed assessment of an invasion by Acacia implexa (Benth.) (screw-pod wattle) anywhere in the world. Approximately 30 000 A. implexa individuals were found spread over about 600 ha (a condensed canopy area of ~96 ha) in three geographically distinct populations, all in the Western Cape, South Africa. Population structures indicate rapidly increasing populations at all sites, with vegetative suckering dominating over reproduction by seed. Populations appear capable of rapidly densifying if given the opportunity, creating monocultures and even out-competing other invasive acacias. Although seed viability is high (~60%), there is relatively low recruitment from seed, likely as a result of high seed predation (with some previous estimates of up to 100% seed loss). While high seed mortality may suggest limited rates of spread (populations are at most 1 km from initial plantings at two of the sites), seeds appear to be able to disperse along roads and watercourses (in particular plants are now established about 5 km down the Eerste River from the putative initial planting site in Stellenbosch). This suggests that the extent of all three populations could increase much more rapidly in the future. Formal risk assessment and bioclimatic niche modelling indicate that this species has the potential to invade large parts of South Africa, particularly in coastal regions. Given the current limited distribution, the potential threats posed and the success of control to date, we consider eradication a feasible and desirable management goal. The estimated cost of clearing established stands was ~ZAR 700 000, but given the strong ability of A. implexa to resprout, proper control and follow-up would be essential to prevent re-establishment of dense stands and further spread. A systematic eradication programme over the next decade will cost an estimated ZAR 1.5 million, giving a total eradication cost of ZAR 2.2 million. We support the proposed listing of the species as category 1a under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, and suggest that the species should not be introduced to other countries without clear and comprehensive contingency plans.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia implexa,,Screw-pod wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,Western Cape,Tokai,Unit(200 ha),2010,Period,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,31200,,,4790.512576,7666.395907,31200,4790.512576,7666.395907,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs for chemical control and labour. Costs of contractors, travel,
and other administrative costs are not included.",Desika Moodley,
SC2137,,Kaplan2012,Distribution and management of Acacia implexa (Benth.) in South Africa: A suitable target for eradication?,"Kaplan, H., Van Zyl, H.W.F., Le Roux, J.J., Richardson, D.M. and Wilson, J.R.U.","This study is the first detailed assessment of an invasion by Acacia implexa (Benth.) (screw-pod wattle) anywhere in the world. Approximately 30 000 A. implexa individuals were found spread over about 600 ha (a condensed canopy area of ~96 ha) in three geographically distinct populations, all in the Western Cape, South Africa. Population structures indicate rapidly increasing populations at all sites, with vegetative suckering dominating over reproduction by seed. Populations appear capable of rapidly densifying if given the opportunity, creating monocultures and even out-competing other invasive acacias. Although seed viability is high (~60%), there is relatively low recruitment from seed, likely as a result of high seed predation (with some previous estimates of up to 100% seed loss). While high seed mortality may suggest limited rates of spread (populations are at most 1 km from initial plantings at two of the sites), seeds appear to be able to disperse along roads and watercourses (in particular plants are now established about 5 km down the Eerste River from the putative initial planting site in Stellenbosch). This suggests that the extent of all three populations could increase much more rapidly in the future. Formal risk assessment and bioclimatic niche modelling indicate that this species has the potential to invade large parts of South Africa, particularly in coastal regions. Given the current limited distribution, the potential threats posed and the success of control to date, we consider eradication a feasible and desirable management goal. The estimated cost of clearing established stands was ~ZAR 700 000, but given the strong ability of A. implexa to resprout, proper control and follow-up would be essential to prevent re-establishment of dense stands and further spread. A systematic eradication programme over the next decade will cost an estimated ZAR 1.5 million, giving a total eradication cost of ZAR 2.2 million. We support the proposed listing of the species as category 1a under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, and suggest that the species should not be introduced to other countries without clear and comprehensive contingency plans.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia implexa,,Screw-pod wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,Western Cape,Wolseley,Unit (192 ha),2010,Period,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,56600,,,8690.481148,13907.62847,56600,8690.481148,13907.62847,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs for chemical control and labour. Costs of contractors, travel,
and other administrative costs are not included.",Desika Moodley,
SC2138,,Kaplan2012,Distribution and management of Acacia implexa (Benth.) in South Africa: A suitable target for eradication?,"Kaplan, H., Van Zyl, H.W.F., Le Roux, J.J., Richardson, D.M. and Wilson, J.R.U.","This study is the first detailed assessment of an invasion by Acacia implexa (Benth.) (screw-pod wattle) anywhere in the world. Approximately 30 000 A. implexa individuals were found spread over about 600 ha (a condensed canopy area of ~96 ha) in three geographically distinct populations, all in the Western Cape, South Africa. Population structures indicate rapidly increasing populations at all sites, with vegetative suckering dominating over reproduction by seed. Populations appear capable of rapidly densifying if given the opportunity, creating monocultures and even out-competing other invasive acacias. Although seed viability is high (~60%), there is relatively low recruitment from seed, likely as a result of high seed predation (with some previous estimates of up to 100% seed loss). While high seed mortality may suggest limited rates of spread (populations are at most 1 km from initial plantings at two of the sites), seeds appear to be able to disperse along roads and watercourses (in particular plants are now established about 5 km down the Eerste River from the putative initial planting site in Stellenbosch). This suggests that the extent of all three populations could increase much more rapidly in the future. Formal risk assessment and bioclimatic niche modelling indicate that this species has the potential to invade large parts of South Africa, particularly in coastal regions. Given the current limited distribution, the potential threats posed and the success of control to date, we consider eradication a feasible and desirable management goal. The estimated cost of clearing established stands was ~ZAR 700 000, but given the strong ability of A. implexa to resprout, proper control and follow-up would be essential to prevent re-establishment of dense stands and further spread. A systematic eradication programme over the next decade will cost an estimated ZAR 1.5 million, giving a total eradication cost of ZAR 2.2 million. We support the proposed listing of the species as category 1a under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act, and suggest that the species should not be introduced to other countries without clear and comprehensive contingency plans.",2012,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia implexa,,Screw-pod wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,Western Cape,Stellenbosch,Unit(208 ha),2010,Period,2010,2010,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,594500,,,91280.76047,146079.2425,594500,91280.76047,146079.2425,ZAR,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs for chemical control and labour. Costs of contractors, travel,
and other administrative costs are not included.",Desika Moodley,
SC2140,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nseleni River,Unit (410 ha),2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,6270,,,7623.825989,14322.7789,6270,7623.825989,14322.7789,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs per hectare for initial spraying and manual clearing used with bio-control (i.e. Integrated approach),Desika Moodley,
SC2143,,DehnenSchmutz2004,Controlling Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles: an economic analysis,"Dehnen-Schmutz,  K.,  Perrings,  C. and Williamson,  M.","What resources should be committed to the control of invasive species? This study is based on a survey of nature conservation and forestry authorities, wildlife trusts and private landowners which investigated the extent of the ecological and economic impacts of the invasive nonnative plant Rhododendron ponticum in the British Isles. There are data on 52,000 ha of land affected by R. ponticum, more than 30,000 ha of it in nature reserves. For nearly all nature reserves, displacement of native species and habitat changes were both reported. In 2001, respondents controlled 1275 ha of R. ponticum at a cost of £670,924. To test the optimality of this, we apply a model of social expenditure. The external costs of R. ponticum control are estimated from the probability that it will spread to contiguous sites and the damage done on invaded sites. These are then used to calculate the socially optimal level of expenditure on R. ponticum control, and the funding gap it identified by comparing the result with current levels of expenditure. The results suggest that a socially optimal level of control effort requires a significant increase in social funding for R. ponticum control, although the size of the increase varies between landholders.",2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Ericales,Ericaceae,Rhododendron,Rhododendron ponticum,,rhododendron,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,,N,Europe,United Kingdom/Ireland,,United Kingdom & Ireland,Unit (21.70 ha),2001,Year,2000,2001,2000,2001,Potentially ongoing,60133,,,142876.7127,,60133,142876.7127,,GBP,2004,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Desika Moodley/Jean Fantle-Lepczyk/Nigel Taylor/Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC2145,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,South Africa,Site,2000-2006,Year,2000,2006,2000,2006,One-time,69500,,,84506.52412,158761.2654,69500,84506.52412,158761.2654,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs for recurrent rearing, releasing, & monitoring of biological control",Desika Moodley,
SC2150,,Bangsund1996,Economics of Herbicide Control of Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula L.),Bangsund et al,,1996,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1996,Unspecified,1996,1996,Potentially ongoing,4000000,3000000,5000000,6251057.273,6251057.273,4000000,6251057.273,6251057.273,USD,1996,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"""About $3 to $5 million is spent annually treating leafy spurge in North Dakota alone. Public funds have been used to offset about 50 to 60% of these treatment costs.""",Marina Golivets,
SC2152,,Eagle2007,"Costs and losses imposed on California ranchers by yellow starthistle forage values,  invasive weed economics,  invasive weeds,  nonnative species CENTAUREA-SOLSTITIALIS,  SOIL While the significant ecosystem damage caused by invasive weeds has been well",Eagle  AJ  Eiswerth  ME  Johnson  WS  Schoenig  SE  van Kooten  GC,"While the significant ecosystem damage caused by invasive weeds has been well documented, the economic consequences of specific invasive weed species are poorly understood. Yellow starthistle(Centaurea solstitialis L., hereafter YST) is the most widespread noncrop weed in California, resulting in serious damage to forage on natural range and improved pasture. A survey was administered to California cattle ranchers to investigate YST infestation rates, loss of forage quantity and value, and control or eradication efforts. The results were used to estimate countywide losses and costs for 3 focus counties, as well as statewide losses/costs, due to YST in California. Total losses of livestock forage value due to YST on private land for the state of California are estimated at $7.65 million per year, with ranchers’ out-of-pocket expenditures on YST control amounting to $9.45 million per year. Together, these amount to the equivalent of 6%–7% of the total annual harvested pasture value for the state. Therefore, while the impacts are relatively small within the statewide total agricultural production system, losses and costs due to YST infestation do constrain California’s livestock grazing sector.
",2007,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea solstitialis,,Yellow starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Rangeland and pasture,12b,NA,North America,USA,California,Calavera/Mariposa/Tehama Counties,Site,1 year,Year,2003,2003,2003,2003,One-time,2340000,1980000,2700000,3117987.724,3117987.724,2340000,3117987.724,3117987.724,USD,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"annual loss and cost estimates for Calaveras, Mariposa, and Tehama counties added together, 2003",,
SC2153,,Gerlach2004,"The impacts of serial land-use changes and biological invasions on soil water resources in California, USA biological invasion,  Centaurea solstitialis,  ecosystem effect,  Mediterranean-type climate,  land-use change,  soil water resources,  annual grass",Gerlach  JD,Land-use changes and biological invasions have converted the vegetation of California’s Central Valley and surrounding foothills from a mixture of perennial forbs and grasses and spring- and summer-?owering annuals to vegetation dominated by Eurasian spring-?owering annual grasses. The exotic annual grass communities are now rapidly being invaded by a Eurasian summer-?owering annual thistle that has caused losses of soil moisture resources on invaded sites of 15–25% of mean annual precipitation. A rough preliminary estimate indicates that the value of the lost water may range from 16 to 75 million dollars per year in the Sacramento River watershed alone. ,2004,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Centaurea,Centaurea solstitialis,,Yellow starthistle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,9,NA,North America,USA,California,Sacramento River Watershed,Site,1 year,Year,1999,1999,1999,1999,One-time,45500000,16000000,75000000,66954471.21,66954471.21,45500000,66954471.21,66954471.21,USD,1999,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,water is lost from the Sacramento River watershed each year through transpiration by C. solstitialis,,
SC2156,,Andres1997,The economics of the biological control of weeds,"Andres, L.A.","Based on studies with host-specific weed-feeding insects, approximately 11--13 years of research may be needed to develop a classical biological control program for a single weed species. This includes the initial assessment of the problem and a survey of indigenous natural enemies, foreign surveys, the study and clearance of the most promising control organisms, and up through initial release. Using estimates of the costs and benefits from the successful alligatorweed project (Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. ), plus examples of several terrestrial biological control of weeds projects, further support for research on classical biological control is economically justified. In addition to the classical approach, biological control of weeds may also be implemented through the use of non-selective weed feeders (e.g., in the case of aquatic weeds, herbivorous fish, crayfish, snails) although periodic surveillance and manipulation are required to avoid unwanted side effects and optimize weed control. Information on the costs and benefits of specific biological control of weeds projects is lacking or sketchy, adding to the present difficulty of making an economic analysis of this method of weed control.",1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,Harris (1976),Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Amaranthaceae,Alternanthera,Alternanthera philoxeroides,,aligator weed,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,aquatic,11,NA,North America,USA,,,Country,1 year,Period,1975,1975,1975,1975,One-time,1500000,1000000,2000000,6832072.623,6832072.623,1500000,6832072.623,6832072.623,USD,1975,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment/Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,biolocontrol project in the 70s,,
SC2157,,Andres1997,The economics of the biological control of weeds,"Andres, L.A.","Based on studies with host-specific weed-feeding insects, approximately 11--13 years of research may be needed to develop a classical biological control program for a single weed species. This includes the initial assessment of the problem and a survey of indigenous natural enemies, foreign surveys, the study and clearance of the most promising control organisms, and up through initial release. Using estimates of the costs and benefits from the successful alligatorweed project (Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. ), plus examples of several terrestrial biological control of weeds projects, further support for research on classical biological control is economically justified. In addition to the classical approach, biological control of weeds may also be implemented through the use of non-selective weed feeders (e.g., in the case of aquatic weeds, herbivorous fish, crayfish, snails) although periodic surveillance and manipulation are required to avoid unwanted side effects and optimize weed control. Information on the costs and benefits of specific biological control of weeds projects is lacking or sketchy, adding to the present difficulty of making an economic analysis of this method of weed control.",1997,English,Peer-reviewed article,"{Rich, 1971; T.M. Taylor, USDA, ARS, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, personal communication, 1976",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Alismatales,Hydrocharitaceae,Hydrilla,Hydrilla verticillata,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,aquatic,11,NA,North America,USA,Florida,Fort Lauderdale,Unit (1 acre),1 year,Year,1976,1976,1976,1976,One-time,421,267,575,1813.360865,1813.360865,421,1813.360865,1813.360865,USD,1976,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Environment/Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,biocontrol using a snail Marisa cornuarietis,,
SC2184,,Senator&Rozenberg2016,Assessment of economic and environmental impact of invasive plant species,"Senator, SA, and AG Rozenberg","This article presents data from a review of published works on the economic damage caused by invasive plant species, their ecological and economical impact, and the legal regulation of biological invasions.
It is concluded that it is necessary to elaborate and adopt a national strategy on alien species, federal regulatory acts concerning the policy on invasive organisms, and general approaches and criteria to evaluate the risk of their spread. Effective control of invasive species is only possible at the rational approach, which takes into consideration individual ecological-biological features of the species, their relations with other components of the community, the properties of the ecosystem invaded by them, expenditures for their control, and the period and consequences of their eradication.",2016,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Commelinales,Pontederiaceae,Eichhornia,Eichhornia crassipes,,Water hyacinth,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Asia,China,,China,Country,Unspecified,Year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2016,2016,Potentially ongoing,750000000,500000000,1000000000,125437195,273401865.5,750000000,125437195,273401865.5,RMB,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Ana Novoa,
SC2192,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Chilo,Chilo partellus,,Spotted stemborer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Ethiopia,,Ethiopia,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,67250000,61300000,73200000,68682498.98,172195964,67250000,68682498.98,172195964,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2193,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Chilo,Chilo partellus,,Spotted stemborer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Kenya,,Kenya,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,46900000,42800000,51000000,47899021.59,106011598.3,46900000,47899021.59,106011598.3,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2194,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Chilo,Chilo partellus,,Spotted stemborer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Malawi,,Malawi,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,121700000,104300000,139100000,124292343.9,484301268.1,121700000,124292343.9,484301268.1,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2195,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Chilo,Chilo partellus,,Spotted stemborer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Tanzania,,Tanzania,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,36200000,30000000,42400000,36971099.82,111942477.7,36200000,36971099.82,111942477.7,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2196,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Crambidae,Chilo,Chilo partellus,,Spotted stemborer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Uganda,,Uganda,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,131450000,118600000,144300000,134250029.6,418081220.8,131450000,134250029.6,418081220.8,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2197,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Viruses,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,Maize lethal necrosis,,Maize lethal necrosis,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Ethiopia,,Ethiopia,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,141850000,131200000,152500000,144871561,363211858.7,141850000,144871561,363211858.7,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2198,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Viruses,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,Maize lethal necrosis,,Maize lethal necrosis,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Kenya,,Kenya,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,134100000,123600000,144600000,136956477.5,303116318.4,134100000,136956477.5,303116318.4,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2199,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Viruses,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,Maize lethal necrosis,,Maize lethal necrosis,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Rwanda,,Rwanda,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,2950000,2700000,3200000,3012838.245,8184412.271,2950000,3012838.245,8184412.271,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2200,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Viruses,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,Maize lethal necrosis,,Maize lethal necrosis,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Tanzania,,Tanzania,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,21350000,19900000,22800000,21804778.49,66021323.2,21350000,21804778.49,66021323.2,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2201,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Viruses,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA,Maize lethal necrosis,,Maize lethal necrosis,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Uganda,,Uganda,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,14950000,13800000,16100000,15268451.45,47548986.32,14950000,15268451.45,47548986.32,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2202,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Ethiopia,,Ethiopia,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,59000000,46600000,71400000,60256764.9,151071552.1,59000000,60256764.9,151071552.1,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2203,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Kenya,,Kenya,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,5750000,3800000,7700000,5872481.325,12997157.57,5750000,5872481.325,12997157.57,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2204,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Tanzania,,Tanzania,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,650000,300000,1000000,663845.715,2010016.865,650000,663845.715,2010016.865,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2205,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Uganda,,Uganda,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,1250000,700000,1800000,1276626.375,3975667.752,1250000,1276626.375,3975667.752,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2209,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Ethiopia,,Ethiopia,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,2750000,2600000,2900000,2808578.025,7041470.648,2750000,2808578.025,7041470.648,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2210,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Kenya,,Kenya,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,49150000,45900000,52400000,50196949.07,111097442.6,49150000,50196949.07,111097442.6,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2211,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Tanzania,,Tanzania,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,21800000,20400000,23200000,22264363.98,67412873.33,21800000,22264363.98,67412873.33,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2212,,43,Economic impacts of invasive alien species on African smallholder livelihoods,"Pratt, C.F., Constantine, K.L. and Murphy, S.T.","In developing countries, invasive alien species (IAS) threaten smallholder farmer production and the food security of subsistence growers, but economic impacts are widely under-reported. Here, the economic impacts of IAS that threaten smallholder mixed maize farming in eastern Africa are presented. Maize is important for most smallholders and is commonly grown with horticultural crops and other cereals which collectively provide nutrition and income. These crops are also important for national economies. Estimates of the economic impacts of five major IAS: Chilo partellus, Maize Lethal Necrosis Disease, Parthenium hysterophorus, Liriomyza spp. and Tuta absoluta on mixed maize smallholders in six countries gave current combined annual losses of US$0.9–1.1 billion; and future annual losses (next 5–10 years) of US$1.0–1.2 billion.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Gelechiidae,Tuta,Tuta absoluta,,Tomato leafminer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Uganda,,Uganda,Country,2009-2013,Year,2009,2013,2009,2013,Potentially ongoing,750000,700000,800000,765975.825,2385400.651,750000,765975.825,2385400.651,USD,2016,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Economic losses were calculated as ""lower and upper estimates"". This was translated as ""Min and Max Raw cost estimate local currency""",Desika Moodley,
SC2234,,Shackleton2017a,Distribution and socio-ecological impacts of the invasive alien cactus Opuntia stricta in eastern Africa,"Shackleton, R.T., Witt, A.B.R., Piroris, F.M. and van Wilgen, B.W.","Many cactus species have been introduced around the world and have subsequently become major invaders, inducing social and ecological costs. We recorded the distribution of Opuntia stricta in eastern Africa, and conducted 200 household interviews using semi-structured questionnaires to assess local perceptions of O. stricta in Laikipia County, Kenya. Opuntia stricta was widespread and abundant in parts of Kenya, Tanzania and Ethiopia and present at low densities in Uganda. In Laikipia County, pastoralists identified that O. stricta had been present for more than 10 years, and were of the opinion that it was still spreading and increasing in density. Twothirds of respondents estimated that 50–75% of valuable grazing land had been invaded, and all felt that it contributed to the ill-health and death of livestock. Other negative impacts included reductions in native plant populations, rangeland condition, human health, and mobility of humans and animals. These negative impacts resulted in economic losses of US$ 500–1000 per household per year for 48% of households. Only 20% of respondents reported
actively managing O. stricta, yet all respondents
believed a reduction in the abundance of this weed
would improve well-being. Management interventions
are needed to reduce negative impacts.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Cactaceae,Opuntia,Opuntia stricta,,Erect prickly pear,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Kenya,,Laikipia,Unit (County),2014,Year,2014,2014,2014,2014,One-time,2550,100,5000,2640.301844,5753.164765,2550,2640.301844,5753.164765,USD,2014,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Estimated cost of livestock loss per household. A total of 50 households were surveyed.,Desika Moodley,
SC2235,,Shackleton2017b,"Distribution of the invasive alien weed, Lantana
camara, and its ecological and livelihood impacts
in eastern Africa","Shackleton, R.T., Witt, A.B.R., Aool, W. and Pratt, C.F.","Lantana camara (lantana) is a major invasive shrub globally, impacting upon biodiversity, economies, ecosystem services, and driving socio-ecological change. The aim of this study was to determine the current and potential distribution of lantana in eastern Africa and its livelihood impacts in one region in Uganda. Data were collected by means of roadside surveys, and then compared with potential distributions based on ecoclimatic models. Household interviews were conducted to understand the impacts of lantana on local livelihoods. Lantana is currently widespread in eastern Africa, and has the potential to spread, especially in Tanzania. According to 40% of respondents, lantana reduced the amount of forage available to livestock by more than 50%, while one-third of those interviewed reported a 26–50% reduction in crop yields. Lantana invasions also cost individual households substantial amounts of money (US$400–500 per annum). Furthermore, lantana reduced the availability of natural resources, such as native medicinal plants, and hindered the movement of people and livestock. Based on the potential distribution of lantana, and its current impacts, we suggest that an integrated management strategy be developed and implemented, including the introduction of additional biological control agents to reduce the negative effects of lantana on local livelihoods.",2017,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Lantana,Lantana camara,,Lantana,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Uganda,,"Masindi, Nakasongola, Nakaseke",Unit (District),2015,Year,2015,2015,2015,2015,One-time,450,400,500,465.3835484,1407.806029,450,465.3835484,1407.806029,USD,2015,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Estimated cost of lantana control in croplands, paid per household. 60% of households paid this amount.",Desika Moodley,
SC2236,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia longifolia,,Golden wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,34445,25 403,43 487,3286.272463,6692.114012,34445,3286.272463,6692.114012,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for harvesting and extraction,Desika Moodley,
SC2237,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia longifolia,,Golden wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,18509,13 678,23 340,1765.876529,3596.003433,18509,1765.876529,3596.003433,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for chipping,Desika Moodley,
SC2238,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia longifolia,,Golden wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,12183,9513,14 853,1162.335823,2366.962549,12183,1162.335823,2366.962549,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for transportation,Desika Moodley,
SC2239,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,18264,15 431,21 097,1742.501968,3548.403842,18264,1742.501968,3548.403842,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for harvesting and extraction,Desika Moodley,
SC2240,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,13938,5831,22 045,1329.774005,2707.931053,13938,1329.774005,2707.931053,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for chipping,Desika Moodley,
SC2241,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia mearnsii,,Black wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,5633.5,2433,8834,537.4717934,1094.499181,5633.5,537.4717934,1094.499181,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for transportation,Desika Moodley,
SC2242,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia saligna,,Port Jackson wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,9660,50 46,14 274,921.6255479,1876.783898,9660,921.6255479,1876.783898,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for harvesting and extraction,Desika Moodley,
SC2243,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia saligna,,Port Jackson wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,3813,2545,5081,363.7844942,740.8050727,3813,363.7844942,740.8050727,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for chipping,Desika Moodley,
SC2244,,Mugido2014,Determining the feasibility of harvesting invasive alien plant species for energy,"Mugido, W., Blignaut, J., Joubert, M., De Wet, J., Knipe, A., Joubert, S., Cobbing, B., Jansen, J., Le Maitre, D. and van der Vyfer, M.","Woody invasive alien plants (IAPs) are a threat to South Africa’s water resources, biodiversity and land productivity. The impacts of IAPs were the main reason for the South African government to embark on a natural resource management public works programme called Working for Water (WfW), which was aimed at controlling IAPs in a cost-effective yet labour-intensive way. At the same time, the high biomass of these species presents opportunities for synergies between the clearing of IAPs and the generation of biomassbased energy. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost of harvesting and extracting, chipping, and transporting the biomass, and also to determine the financial and economic feasibility of such an exercise from a commercial perspective. Sampling of the biomass was done at 31 representative sites within the Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality, South Africa. The cost of the operation was carefully monitored, documented and reported at each stage, and compared to the cost of replacing the thermal coal currently used by industry within this municipality. The project proved to be financially viable, but only when the energy entrepreneur forms a partnership with the WfW programme, and then only under specific conditions. The project has, however, very high socio-economic returns with respect to a reduction in environmental externalities and job creation.",2014,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia saligna,,Port Jackson wattle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,South Africa,,Nelson Mandela Bay Municipality,Site,2013,Period,2013,2013,2013,2013,One-time,2834,2579,3089,270.3816566,550.6009903,2834,270.3816566,550.6009903,ZAR,2014,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per hectare for transportation,Desika Moodley,
SC2260,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Asia,India,,India,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,28,14,42,34.04579389,140.7752004,28,34.04579389,140.7752004,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost per square meter for hand-weeding 100 plants (mechanical control),Desika Moodley,
SC2261,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Parthenium,Parthenium hysterophorus,,Parthenium weed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Oceania,Australia,,Queensland And New South Wales,Site,2006,Year,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,5546500,4 667 000,6 426 000,6744106.993,6382218.547,5546500,6744106.993,6382218.547,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Costs for wash-down facilities; mandatory inspections; eradication; adoption of codes of practice,Desika Moodley,
SC2268,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,New York,Buchanan,Site,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,70000,60000,80000,87860.23042,87860.23042,70000,87860.23042,87860.23042,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,operating cost of NcOcl system in Indian Point 3 nuvlear power plant,Elena Manfrini/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
SC2269,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,New York,Buchanan,Site,1990,Period,1990,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,175000,150000,200000,219650.5761,219650.5761,175000,219650.5761,219650.5761,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"The reported cost is Mechanical mussel
removal every 2 or 3 years",Elena Manfrini/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
SC2270,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,New York,Buchanan,Site,1990,Year,1990,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,5000,4000,6000,6275.730745,6275.730745,5000,6275.730745,6275.730745,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,operating cost of NcOcl system in Fitzpatrick Nuclear energy plant,Elena Manfrini/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
SC2271,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Tennessee,Tennessee Valley,Unit (River),2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,60000,50000,70000,75308.76894,75308.76894,60000,75308.76894,75308.76894,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"rental
costs for thermal treatment",Elena Manfrini/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
SC2272,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River Basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,,2005,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Kentucky,Barkley Dam,Site,1993,Year,1993,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,34547,11111,57983,43361.53401,43361.53401,34547,43361.53401,43361.53401,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Automated chlorine injection in cheatham dam,Elena Manfrini/Phillip Haubrock,Yes
SC2278,TC,MXEngl_3,Economics of classical biological control: a research practice,"Cullen and Whitten,",,1995,English,Book chapter,"Born, W,; Raushmayer, F.; Bräuer, I.,2005. Economic Evaluation of Biological Invasions - A Survey. Ecol. Econ. 55, 321-336",Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Boraginales,Boraginaceae,Echium,Echium plantagineum,,purple viper's bugloss,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Oceania,Australia,,Unspecified,Country,1995,Period,1995,Unspecified,1995,1995,One-time,1350000,700000,2000000,1609725.768,1658002.719,1350000,1609725.768,1658002.719,AUD,1995,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2279,TC,MX1,The economic impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species: A review of the Literature.,"Lowell, Sj. Stone S.",,2005,English,Working paper,"Revollo Fernandez, D. 2019. Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",No,Animalia,Chordata,Cephalaspidomorphi,Petromyzontiformes,Petromyzontidae,Petromyzon,Petromyzon marinus,,Lamprea marina,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2005,Period,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,2515000,30000,5000000,3156692.565,3156692.565,2515000,3156692.565,3156692.565,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2280,TC,MX1,The economic impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species: A review of the Literature.,"Lowell, Sj. Stone S.",,2005,English,Working paper,"Revollo Fernandez, D. 2019. Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",No,Animalia,Chordata,Actinopterygii,Perciformes,Percidae,Gymnocephalus,Gymnocephalus cernua,,Acerina,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2005,Period,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,305000,10000,600000,382819.5754,382819.5754,305000,382819.5754,382819.5754,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2281,TC,MX1,The economic impacts of Aquatic Invasive Species: A review of the Literature.,"Lowell, Sj. Stone S.",,2005,English,Working paper,"Revollo Fernandez, D. 2019. Actualizacion de la propuesta de un seguro de responsabilidad ambiental para las unidades de produccion de peces de ornato, indicando los existentes en la literatura internacional y la propuesta de establecimineto del seguro en Mexico, incluyendo la descripcion de esfuerzo y viabilidad para su implementacion. Proyecto No. 00089333: ""Aumentar las Capacidades Nacionales para el Manejo de las Especies Exonitcas Invasoras (EEI) a traves de la Implementacion de la Estrategia Nacional de EEI""",No,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Mejillon cebra,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2005,Period,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,One-time,2550000,100000,5000000,3200622.68,3200622.68,2550000,3200622.68,3200622.68,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2283,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Bacteria,Proteobacteria,Gammaproteobacteria,Aeromonadales,Aeromonadaceae,Aeromonas,Aeromonas salmonicida,,,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Aquatic species,11,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,2000000,2000000,2000000,329596.1367,266622.3752,2000000,329596.1367,266622.3752,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Fishery,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Damage cost, cost of vaccination",Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2284,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Menyanthaceae,Nymphoides,Nymphoides peltata,,yellow floating heart,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Aquatic species,11,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,50500000,28000000,73000000,8322302.451,6732214.973,50500000,8322302.451,6732214.973,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control costs of mechanical control in lakes,Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2285,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Maxillopoda,Sessilia,Balanidae,Balanus,Balanus improvisus,,bay barnacle,Aquatic,aquatic,N,Aquatic species,11,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,290500000,165000000,416000000,47873838.85,38726900,290500000,47873838.85,38726900,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Control costs for private boats, commercial vessels and power plants",Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2287,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rosa,Rosa rugosa,,Japanese rose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,8000000,1000000,15000000,1318384.547,1066489.501,8000000,1318384.547,1066489.501,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control costs: costs for implemented local measures in municipalities in South Sweden,Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2288,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Heracleum,Heracleum mantegazzianum,,giant hogweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,45000000,17000000,73000000,7415913.075,5999003.442,45000000,7415913.075,5999003.442,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Control costs for controlling the species along roads, railways and in public areas. These are local data scaled up to the national level based on the spread of the species in Sweden.",Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2290,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Artemisia,Artemisia vulgaris,,mugwort,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,67000000,18000000,116000000,11041470.58,8931849.569,67000000,11041470.58,8931849.569,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Damage cost and health impact,Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2291,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,18500000,1000000,36000000,3048764.264,2466256.97,18500000,3048764.264,2466256.97,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Damage cost and health impact,Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2293,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Ophiostomatales,Ophiostomataceae,Ophiostoma,Ophiostoma ulmi,,Dutch elm disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,37000000,20000000,54000000,6097528.528,4932513.941,37000000,6097528.528,4932513.941,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control costs of felling infected trees.,Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2294,,Gren2009,Costs of Alien Invasive Species in Sweden,"Gren, I.-M., Isacs, L., & Carlsson, M.","The purpose of this paper is to present calculations of total costs of 13 alien invasive species (AIS) in Sweden. All species are subject to control by Swedish public authorities, and estimates for most AIS include either damage cost or actual control cost. The results indicate a total annual cost between approximately 1620 and 5080 million SEK, which correspond to SEK 175 and SEK 565 per capita in Sweden. The estimates are well within the range of similar calculations for other countries, but differ with respect to the composition of costs of different AIS. Whereas costs for the agricultural and forestry sectors dominate in most other studies, the costs of AIS in Sweden are more equally divided among different categories. The results also indicate that the highest costs are attributable to unintentionally introduced AIS and that the most reliable cost estimates are related to human and animal health.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Fungi,Ascomycota,Sordariomycetes,Ophiostomatales,Ophiostomataceae,Ophiostoma,Ophiostoma ulmi,,Dutch elm disease,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Sweden,,Unspecified,Country,2006,Year,2006,Unspecified,2006,2006,Potentially ongoing,1031000000,63000000,1999000000,169906808.5,137443834.4,1031000000,169906808.5,137443834.4,SEK,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Lost value of urban trees,Laura Verbrugge,No
SC2301,,Hedge2003,"A review of Spartina management in Washington State, US",Hedge P Kriwoken LK Patten K,"Management of non-native Spartinaplants including Spar-tina  alterniflora  Lois.,Spartina  anglica  C.  HubbandSpartinapatens (Ait.) Muhl. in Washington State, U.S. evolved duringthe 1990s from small-scale field trials to a large-scale integrat-ed pest management program. The development and imple-mentation  of  the  program  were  significantly  hindered  bystakeholder conflict, particularly regarding the use of herbi-cide  in  estuarine  environments.  In  1995,  Washington  StateDepartment  of  Agriculture  was  appointed  to  manage  theseinvasive  species.  Agency  coordination  and  strategy  reviewswere  undertaken.  A  wide  range  of  control  techniques,  in-cluding physical removal, mowing and herbicide, were estab-lished,   with   all   techniques   demonstrating   considerablelimitations. The combination of mowing and herbicide pro-vided  the  greatest  efficacy  but  was  expensive.  Developmentof biological control options is in progress but will take yearsto  prove  effectiveness  for  Spartinamanagement.  Programprogress based on existing mapping and efficacy data is diffi-cult  to  gauge.  This  program  demonstrates  that  Spartinaplants are difficult and expensive to eradicate. Between 1995and  2000,  infestations  increased  in  area  by  250%,  affectingmore than 8,093 ha of intertidal land. During this period, ap-proximately 15% of the infestation was treated annually. Al-though  the  program  has  evolved  considerably,  substantiallyincreasing knowledge on the management of Spartina, infes-tations  in  Washington  State  continue  to  present  a  range  ofmanagement  challenges,  including  the  development  of  astandardized and integrated mapping procedures, cost-effec-tive  control  techniques  and  improvements  to  stakeholdermanagement.",2003,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Sporobolus,Sporobolus cynosuroides,,Spartina,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,12a,N,North America,USA,,Washington,Unit (Ha),1997,Year,1997,Unspecified,1997,1997,Potentially ongoing,2700,1700,3700,3597.678143,3597.678143,2700,3597.678143,3597.678143,USD,2003,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,single mowing followed by Rodeoapplication once new Spartinagrowth reaches 30 to 45 cm inheight,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2309,,Eiswerth2000,"Potential environmental impacts and economic damages of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in western Nevada and northeastern California aquatic weeds, economic impacts, invasive species, recreation, MYPSP LAKE, MACROPHYTES, QUALITY Euras",Eiswerth ME Donaldson SG Johnson WS,"Eurasian watermilfoil, an aquatic invasive weed, has been identified recently at a number
of sites in western Nevada and northeastern California, including Lake Tahoe. Because Eurasian
watermilfoil is easily spread by fragments, transport on boats and boating equipment plays a key
role in contaminating new water bodies. This is an important means of the potential spread of this
weed throughout key recreational and agricultural areas surrounding Lake Tahoe. Unless the weed
is controlled, significant alterations of aquatic ecosystems, with associated degradation of natural
resources and economic damages to human uses of those resources, may occur. This research uses
the economic valuation approach known as benefits transfer to estimate the value of a portion of the
recreational service flows that society currently enjoys in the Truckee River watershed below Lake
Tahoe. The lower-bound estimates of baseline water-based recreation value at a subset of sites in the
watershed range from $30 to $45 million/yr. Impacts from the continued spread of Eurasian watermilfoil
in the watershed could be significant; for example, even a 1% decrease in recreation values
would correspond to roughly $500,000/yr as a lower bound.",2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian Watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,,California,Site,2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,65000,30000,100000,92524.81369,92524.81369,65000,92524.81369,92524.81369,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"capital expenditures
per machine",Phillip Haubrock,
SC2310,,Eiswerth2000,"Potential environmental impacts and economic damages of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in western Nevada and northeastern California aquatic weeds, economic impacts, invasive species, recreation, MYPSP LAKE, MACROPHYTES, QUALITY Euras",Eiswerth ME Donaldson SG Johnson WS,"Eurasian watermilfoil, an aquatic invasive weed, has been identified recently at a number
of sites in western Nevada and northeastern California, including Lake Tahoe. Because Eurasian
watermilfoil is easily spread by fragments, transport on boats and boating equipment plays a key
role in contaminating new water bodies. This is an important means of the potential spread of this
weed throughout key recreational and agricultural areas surrounding Lake Tahoe. Unless the weed
is controlled, significant alterations of aquatic ecosystems, with associated degradation of natural
resources and economic damages to human uses of those resources, may occur. This research uses
the economic valuation approach known as benefits transfer to estimate the value of a portion of the
recreational service flows that society currently enjoys in the Truckee River watershed below Lake
Tahoe. The lower-bound estimates of baseline water-based recreation value at a subset of sites in the
watershed range from $30 to $45 million/yr. Impacts from the continued spread of Eurasian watermilfoil
in the watershed could be significant; for example, even a 1% decrease in recreation values
would correspond to roughly $500,000/yr as a lower bound.",2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian Watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,,California,Unit (Ha),2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,1125,750,1500,1601.391006,1601.391006,1125,1601.391006,1601.391006,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,costs of professional harvesting,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2311,,Eiswerth2000,"Potential environmental impacts and economic damages of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in western Nevada and northeastern California aquatic weeds, economic impacts, invasive species, recreation, MYPSP LAKE, MACROPHYTES, QUALITY Euras",Eiswerth ME Donaldson SG Johnson WS,"Eurasian watermilfoil, an aquatic invasive weed, has been identified recently at a number
of sites in western Nevada and northeastern California, including Lake Tahoe. Because Eurasian
watermilfoil is easily spread by fragments, transport on boats and boating equipment plays a key
role in contaminating new water bodies. This is an important means of the potential spread of this
weed throughout key recreational and agricultural areas surrounding Lake Tahoe. Unless the weed
is controlled, significant alterations of aquatic ecosystems, with associated degradation of natural
resources and economic damages to human uses of those resources, may occur. This research uses
the economic valuation approach known as benefits transfer to estimate the value of a portion of the
recreational service flows that society currently enjoys in the Truckee River watershed below Lake
Tahoe. The lower-bound estimates of baseline water-based recreation value at a subset of sites in the
watershed range from $30 to $45 million/yr. Impacts from the continued spread of Eurasian watermilfoil
in the watershed could be significant; for example, even a 1% decrease in recreation values
would correspond to roughly $500,000/yr as a lower bound.",2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Saxifragales,Haloragaceae,Myriophyllum,Myriophyllum spicatum,,Eurasian Watermilfoil,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,,California,Unit (Ha),2000,Year,2000,Unspecified,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,2750,500,5000,3914.511348,3914.511348,2750,3914.511348,3914.511348,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,chemical control,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2324,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Benin,,Sw Benin,Site,2006,Period,2006,2006,2006,2006,One-time,11780,,,14323.55186,36795.32844,11780,14323.55186,36795.32844,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs for recurrent rearing, releasing, & monitoring of biological control",Desika Moodley,
SC2327,,Andreu_etal2009,An Assessment of Stakeholder Perceptions and Management of Noxious Alien Plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,"Despite biological invasions being a worldwide phenomenon causing significant ecological, economic, and human welfare impacts, there is limited understanding regarding how environmental managers perceive the problem and subsequently manage alien species. Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires to (1) analyze the extent to which they perceive plant invasions as a problem; (2) identify the status, occurrence, and impacts of noxious alien plant species; (3) assess current effort and expenditure targeting alien plant management; and, finally, (4) identify the criteria they use to set priorities for management. In comparison to other environmental concerns, plant invasions are perceived as only moderately problematic and mechanical control is the most valued and frequently used strategy to cope with plant invasions in Spain. Based on 70 questionnaires received, 193 species are considered noxious, 109 of which have been the subject of management activities. More than 90% of species are found in at least one protected area. According to respondents, the most frequently managed species are the most widespread across administrative regions and the ones perceived as causing the highest impacts. The perception of impact seems to be independent of their invasion status, since only half of the species identified as noxious are believed to be invasive in Spain, while 43% of species thought to only be casual aliens are causing a high impact. Records of management costs are poor and the few data indicate that the total actual expenditure amounted to 50,492,437 € in the last decade. The majority of respondents stated that management measures are insufficient to control alien plants due to limited economic resources, lack of public awareness and support, and an absence of coordination among different public administrations. Managers also expressed their concern about the fact that much scientific research is concerned with the ecology of alien plants rather than with specific cost-efficient strategies to manage alien species.",2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Senecio,Senecio inaequidens,,Narrow-leaved ragwort/Guano bush/Small-leaved groundsel/South African ragwort/Groundsel,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spain,Country,most probably the last decade,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,19600,,,31234.77222,31166.2937,1781.818182,2839.524747,2833.299427,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.",Ana Novoa,No
SC2328,,Andreu_etal2009,An assessment of stakeholder perceptions and management of noxious alien plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ageratina,Ageratina adenophora,,Maui pamakani,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spanish Natural Protected Areas,Country,10 years,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,23109,,,36826.75261,36746.01434,2100.818182,3347.886601,3340.546759,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. . Only direct expenditure on management estimated. Annual costs not estimated, these 'probably occurred over the last decade'",,No
SC2333,,Andreu_etal2009,An assessment of stakeholder perceptions and management of noxious alien plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Simaroubaceae,Ailanthus,Ailanthus altissima,,tree of heaven,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spanish Natural Protected Areas,Country,10 years,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,28675,,,45696.79048,45596.60571,2606.818182,4154.25368,4145.145974,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade. Only direct expenditure on management estimated. Annual costs not estimated, these 'probably occurred over the last decade'",,No
SC2337,,Andreu_etal2009,An assessment of stakeholder perceptions and management of noxious alien plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Caryophyllales,Polygonaceae,Rumex,Rumex lunaria,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spanish Natural Protected Areas,Country,10 years,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,86000,,,137050.5312,136750.0642,7818.181818,12459.1392,12431.82402,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade. Only direct expenditure on management estimated. Annual costs not estimated, these 'probably occurred over the last decade'",,No
SC2342,,Wise2007,The Economic Impact and Appropriate Management of Selected Invasive Alien Species on the African Continent,"Wise, R.M., van Wilgen, B.W., Hill, M.P., Schulthess, F., Tweddle, D., Chabi-Olay, A. and Zimmermann, H.G.","This report provides case studies of the economic impact of five invasive alien species in different areas in Africa. The overall aim of this work was to provide detailed information to administrators and managers. The species were:
• Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus);
• Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes);
• The larger grain borer (Prostephanus truncatus);
• Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus); and
• Triffid weed (Chromolaena odorata).
This report is in two parts. The first is an overview of the case studies, intended to provide an expanded outline of the overall approach and main findings of these studies. Part 1 provides a succinct overview of the approach to economic assessment, and on the case studies, and is intended to be a readable, uncluttered account of the findings. Part 2 consists of appendices that provide the full details of the economic methods used, and the data and findings behind each of the case studies. These appendices are intended for the more technically-oriented reader, and they can serve as a resource for those seeking detailed information. Our studies have highlighted some of the difficulties that face researchers when they attempt to estimate the costs of invasive species and the benefits of control. It is difficult to quantify impacts or to estimate the rates of spread and densification of species invasions. Quantifying the impacts of alien invasions on biodiversity in economic terms is an especially difficult task. It would rather be illuminating to consider the cumulative effects of the steady replacement of a large number of indigenous species by a small number of invasive alien species over time, and not simply take each case study on its own – the latter approach seldom provides an adequate reflection of impacts. However, even with limited data available, and other constraints, it appears (from our and other studies) that control of invasive species will deliver positive benefits, and that control operations, if carried out effectively, will be worth the effort.",2007,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Bostrichidae,Prostephanus,Prostephanus truncatus,,Larger grain borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,Africa,Benin,,Sw Benin,Site,2006-2013,Year,2006,2013,2006,2013,One-time,218000,,,265070.8239,680932.2241,218000,265070.8239,680932.2241,USD,2006,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Costs for intial rearing, releasing, & monitoring of biological control",Desika Moodley,
SC2343,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,Potentially ongoing,221391,,,415337.2256,415337.2256,221391,415337.2256,415337.2256,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Table_3_Value of lost Animal Unit Months (Ranchers and landowners lost in foregone income due to reduced carrying capacity from leafy spurge infestations on grazing lands).,Marina Golivets,
SC2346,GS,Bullock2012,Assessing and controlling the spread and the effects of common ragweed in Europe,Bullock et al,,2012,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Czech Republic,,,Country,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,2011,Unspecified,2011,2011,Potentially ongoing,1100000,,,1668517.966,89820.83937,1100000,1668517.966,89820.83937,EUR,2011,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Impacts were assessed for the probability?adjusted human population exposed to ragweed pollen. Costs were calculated in relation to increased costs of medication (assumed to be €303 yr?1) and of staff time to give treatment (with costs based on countries wage rates for nurses and doctors assuming 1 hr of additional consultation and treatment time per affected individual).,Marina Golivets,No
SC2359,,Andreu_etal2009,An assessment of stakeholder perceptions and management of noxious alien plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus setaceus,,fountain grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spanish Natural Protected Areas,Country,10 years,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,6203300,,,9885646.046,9863972.945,563936.3636,898695.0951,896724.8132,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade. Only direct expenditure on management estimated. Annual costs not estimated, these 'probably occurred over the last decade'",,No
SC2364,,Andreu_etal2009,An assessment of stakeholder perceptions and management of noxious alien plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Lamiaceae,Plectranthus,Plectranthus parviflorus,,Swedish ivy,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spanish Natural Protected Areas,Country,10 years,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,6251,,,9961.661282,9939.821527,568.2727273,905.6055711,903.6201388,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade.. Only direct expenditure on management estimated. Annual costs not estimated, these 'probably occurred over the last decade'",,No
SC2365,,Andreu_etal2009,An assessment of stakeholder perceptions and management of noxious alien plants in Spain,Andreu J. Vila M & Hulme PE.,,2009,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cortaderia,Cortaderia selloana,,pampas grass,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Spain,Spain,Spanish Natural Protected Areas,Country,10 years,Period,1999,2009,1999,2009,Potentially ongoing,8600,,,13705.05312,13675.00642,781.8181818,1245.91392,1243.182402,EUR,2009,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"Spanish environmental managers were surveyed using questionnaires. Costs are direct expendidures on management activities. Most of the costs are related to control. Prevention and restoration costs amount to 1% and 2% respectively of the total costs. Although annual costs could not be estimated, the total expenditure probably occurred over the last decade. Only direct expenditure on management estimated. Annual costs not estimated, these 'probably occurred over the last decade'",,No
SC2369,,Thompson1990b,Economic Impact of Leafy Spurge on North Dakota Grazing Land,Thompson,,1990,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland (grazing land),4,N,North America,USA,North Dakota,North Dakota,Site,Unspecified/Yearly,Year,1989,Unspecified,1989,1989,Potentially ongoing,29752000,,,58828700,58828700,29752000,58828700,58828700,USD,1989,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"""$29,752,000 of reduced livestock sales resulting from leafy spurge infestation""",Marina Golivets,
SC2375,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Sapindales,Sapindaceae,Sapindus,Sapindus saponaria,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santiago Island,Site,2003-2008,Period,2001,2008,2001,2007,One-time,500,,,,569.2446287,62.5,71.15557859,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2376,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Gentianales,Apocynaceae,Cryptostegia,Cryptostegia grandiflora,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,2006-2008,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,370,,,,421.2410252,123.3333333,140.4136751,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2377,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Poales,Poaceae,Cenchrus,Cenchrus pilosus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,2005-2008,Period,2005,2008,2005,2008,One-time,200,,,,227.6978515,50,56.92446287,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2378,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Laurales,Lauraceae,Persea,Persea americana,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santiago Island,Site,2003-2008,Period,2001,2008,2001,2008,One-time,1500,,,,1707.733886,187.5,213.4667358,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2379,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Acacia,Acacia nilotica,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,2006-2008,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,250,,,,284.6223143,83.33333333,94.87410478,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2380,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Pueraria,Pueraria phaseoloides,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,1996-2008,Period,1996,2008,1996,2008,One-time,1600,,,,1821.582812,123.0769231,140.1217548,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2381,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Isabela,Site,2001-2008,Period,2001,2008,2001,2008,One-time,6000,,,,6830.935544,750,853.866943,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2382,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus adenotrichos,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,1999-2008,Period,1999,2008,1999,2008,One-time,2549,,,,2902.009117,254.9,290.2009117,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2383,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus megalococcus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,2000-2008,Period,2000,2008,2000,2008,One-time,5436,,,,6188.827603,604,687.6475114,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2384,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Syzygium,Syzygium jambos,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Floreana,Site,2007-2008,Period,2007,2008,2007,2008,One-time,4000,,,,4553.957029,2000,2276.978515,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2385,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Solanales,Solanaceae,Solanum,Solanum quitoense,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santiago Island,Site,2006-2008,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,200,,,,227.6978515,66.66666667,75.89928382,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2387,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Liliopsida,Asparagales,Asparagaceae,Furcraea,Furcraea hexapetala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Floreana,Site,2007-2008,Period,2007,2008,2007,2008,One-time,16000,,,,18215.82812,8000,9107.914059,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2388,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Piperales,Aristolochiaceae,Aristolochia,Aristolochia odoratissima,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,2002-2008,Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,55670,,,,63379.69696,7952.857143,9054.242422,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2389,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Fabales,Fabaceae,Leucaena,Leucaena leucocephala,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Floreana,Site,2007-2008,Period,2007,2008,2007,2008,One-time,8000,,,,9107.914059,4000,4553.957029,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2390,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus glaucus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,2000-2008,Period,2000,2008,2000,2008,One-time,37989,,,,43250.0684,4221,4805.563155,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2391,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus ulmifolius,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,2002-2008,Period,2002,2008,2002,2008,One-time,6690,,,,7616.493132,955.7142857,1088.070447,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2392,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Lamiales,Verbenaceae,Citharexylum,Citharexylum gentryi,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santa Cruz (Island),Site,2000-2008,Period,2000,2008,2000,2008,One-time,128325,,,,146096.634,14258.33333,16232.95933,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2393,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Santiago Island,Site,2006-2008,Period,2006,2008,2006,2008,One-time,50000,,,,56924.46287,16666.66667,18974.82096,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2394,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Floreana,Site,2007-2008,Period,2007,2008,2007,2008,One-time,48000,,,,54647.48435,24000,27323.74218,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2395,TC,306,Eradications and people: lessons from the plant eradication program in Galapagos,Gardener et al,,2010,English,Peer-reviewed article,Glen; A. S.; Atkinson; R.; Campbell; K. J.; Hagen; E.; Holmes; N. D.; Keitt; B. S.; _ Torres; H. (2013). Eradicating multiple invasive species on inhabited islands: The next big step in island restoration? Biological Invasions; 15(12); 2589_2603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0495-y,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Rosales,Rosaceae,Rubus,Rubus niveus,,,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,Y,South America,Ecuador,Galapagos Islands,Isabela,Site,1998-2008,Period,1998,2008,1998,2008,One-time,39300,,,,44742.62781,3572.727273,4067.511619,,USD,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,
SC2396,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Apiales,Apiaceae,Hydrocotyle,Hydrocotyle ranunculoides,,Floating pennywort,Aquatic,Aquatic,Y,rivers/canals,11,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,Wales,Wales,Site,2008,Year,2008,Unspecified,2008,2008,Potentially ongoing,69000,,,144412.9277,111952.0683,69000,144412.9277,111952.0683,GBP,2008,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Table 4.8 The rest of the costs are in Cost_ID 1686, 1687 and SC1635",Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne,Yes
SC2400,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Dendroctonus,Dendroctonus micans,,great spruce bark beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,1\2,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,England/Wales/Scotland,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,2003,Year,2003,Unspecified,2003,2003,Potentially ongoing,25000,,,54389.11078,47817.17456,25000,54389.11078,47817.17456,GBP,2003,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,"pp93. Propagation and release of R. grandis amounted to approximately £25,000 per year in 2003.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,No
SC2401,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al.,"The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat. A number of estimates of the economic impact of INNS on various countries, including the UK, exist, but the detail in many of these estimates is lacking and the impact on different sectors of the country is largely unknown. This research estimates the current annual cost of INNS to the British economy. The report provides assessments of the economic cost of INNS to twelve sectors and the report contains detailed examples for three species (Japanese knotweed, signal crayfish and floating pennywort). Five case studies are also included to demonstrate the costs of eradication at different stages of invasion. The report only considers negative economic impacts of INNS, although it is acknowledged that non-native species, including some invasive ones can make a positive contribution to the economy. Various methods were used to secure data for economic estimations. References of relevance to over 500 non-native species were gathered from the scientific and grey literature as well as the internet. A detailed questionnaire was sent to key organisations, primarily to develop contacts but also to gather initial information. The collected information was used to estimate the costs, partially based on calculations for individual species, which was anonymously reviewed by selected experts from each of the sectors. The total current annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated, when corrected for double counting, at £1,291,461,000 to England, £244,736,000 to Scotland and £125,118,000 to Wales. Therefore the total annual cost of INNS to the British economy is estimated at approximately £1.7 billion.",2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Curculionidae,Dendroctonus,Dendroctonus micans,,great spruce bark beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,1\2,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,England/Wales/Scotland,England/Wales/Scotland,Country,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,113126,90101,136151,196493.7528,181072.0196,113126,196493.7528,181072.0196,GBP,2010,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"pp93. Annual equivalent values at a 0.25% loss (considered the most likely rate when R. grandis is used for control) of timber value were estimated to range between £90,101 and£136,151.",Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,No
SC2402,Go,93,The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain,Williams et al,,2010,English,Official report,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Mustelidae,Neovison,Neovison vison,,American mink,Aquatic/Terrestrial,Semi-aquatic,Y,NA,NA,NA,Europe,United Kingdom,Scotland,Scotland,Site,2010,Year,2010,Unspecified,2010,2010,Potentially ongoing,111785,,,194164.5082,178925.5849,111785,194164.5082,178925.5849,GBP,2010,Effective,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,"Estimate, well detailled. The author considered the price of turkey and geese and multiplied by the number of attacks. It is also divided between England Scotland (and Western isles) & Wales.
""This provided a total cost of £139,294. Data concerning the number of free-range poultry farms also indicates their distribution, with the highest densities found in England.
Therefore this cost is divided between England (£77,506), Scotland (£37,859) and Wales (£23,929). Once the cost of lost poultry production in the Western Isles is included the total cost to Scotland is therefore £111,785""
=> Western Isle = £73926 
=> so total value is 
£139294 + £73926 =  £213220",Elena Angulo/Christophe Diagne/Liliana Ballesteros-Mejia,Yes
SC2425,TC,ITA2,Le Specie Aliene Invasive: Cosa E Come Comunicare Al Grande Pubblico,Tricarico et a. 2018,NA,2018,Itialian,Report,Tricarico et a. 2019. Le Specie Aliene Invasive: Cosa E Come Comunicare Al Grande Pubblico,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Anoplophora,Anoplophora chinensis,,citrus long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Italy,Lombardia,Lombardia,Site,Unspecified,year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,300000,,,345838.9485,,300000,345838.9485,,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Control/Damage-Loss,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Control costs,Phillip Haubrock/Elena Tricarico,Yes
SC2427,TC,ITA2,Le Specie Aliene Invasive: Cosa E Come Comunicare Al Grande Pubblico,Tricarico et a. 2018,NA,2018,Itialian,Report,Tricarico et a. 2019. Le Specie Aliene Invasive: Cosa E Come Comunicare Al Grande Pubblico,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Diptera,Culicidae,Aedes,Aedes albopictus,,tiger mosquito,Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Italy,Emilia-Romagna,Emilia-Romagna (280 municipalities),Site,Unspecified,year,Unspecified,Unspecified,2018,2018,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1152796.495,,1000000,1152796.495,,EUR,2018,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Health,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,2388(2228)/SC2426,no,Control costs,Phillip Haubrock/Elena Tricarico,Yes
SC2429,TC,ITA2,Le Specie Aliene Invasive: Cosa E Come Comunicare Al Grande Pubblico,Tricarico et a. 2018,NA,2018,Itialian,Report,Tricarico et a. 2019. Le Specie Aliene Invasive: Cosa E Come Comunicare Al Grande Pubblico,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Italy,Tuscany,Tuscany,Site,2008,Period,Unspecified,Unspecified,2008,2008,One-time,20000,,,33488.78603,,20000,33488.78603,,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Control costs,Phillip Haubrock/Elena Tricarico,Yes
SC2430,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Tennessee,Nashville,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,57983,,,72777.13915,72777.13915,57983,72777.13915,72777.13915,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of unit to protect water from mussle infestation,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2432,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Tennessee,Nashville,Site,1993,Year,1993,1993,1993,1993,One-time,70868,,,88949.69728,88949.69728,70868,88949.69728,88949.69728,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Cost of unit to protect water from mussle infestation,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2433,TC,ITA3,La ricerca scientifica sul Punteruolo rosso delle palme e gli altri fitofagi delle palme in Sicilia. Vol. I: 39-42.,Giovino A; Agnello S; Salamone A; Zizzo GV (2008). ,NA,2008,Itialian,Report,Tricarico et a. 2019. Le Specie Aliene Invasive: Cosa E Come Comunicare Al Grande Pubblico,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Dryophthoridae,Rhynchophorus,Rhynchophorus ferrugineus,,Red palm weevil,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,NA,NA,N,Europe,Italy,Sicily,Sicily,Site,2005-2008,Year,2005,2008,2005,2008,One-time,12000000,,,20093271.62,,3000000,5023317.904,,EUR,2008,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Forestry,Damage-Loss/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,12000000 over 3 years,Phillip Haubrock/Elena Tricarico,Yes
SC2435,TC,ITA4,"Pollinosi da Ambrosia: prevenzione primaria della diffusione della pianta infestante. 40° Congresso Nazionale SItI (Società Italiana di Igiene), Cernobbio, 8-11 settembre.",Amedei et al. 2002,NA,2002,Itialian,Poster,Tricarico et a. 2019. Le Specie Aliene Invasive: Cosa E Come Comunicare Al Grande Pubblico,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Asterales,Asteraceae,Ambrosia,Ambrosia artemisiifolia,,common ragweed,Aquatic,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Italy,Lombardia,Lombardia,Site,2001,Year,2001,2001,2001,2001,One-time,1774213,,,2286169.128,,1774213,2286169.128,,EUR,2002,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Control/Medical care,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,total costs inferred by that plant,Phillip Haubrock/Elena Tricarico,Yes
SC2436,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,Ontario,Niagara River System,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,403000,,,505823.898,,403000,505823.898,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,installation of a NaOCl system for Sir Adam Beck SAB#1,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2437,TC,ITA5,"Report workshop management of Anoplophora, 22-24 November 2006, Wageningen, the Netherlands.",Van der Gaag  2007,NA,2007,English,Report,Van der Gaag  2007,No,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Cerambycidae,Dreissena,Anoplophora chinensis,,citrus long-horned beetle,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,NA,N,Europe,Italy,Lombardia,Lombardia,Site,Unspecified,Unspecified,Unspecified,Unspecified,2007,2007,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1620175.029,,1000000,1620175.029,,EUR,2007,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Unspecified,Control/Damage,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,Management action: cutting of damaged trees,Phillip Haubrock/Elena Tricarico,Yes
SC2438,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,Canada,Ontario,Niagara River System,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,805088,,,1010503.103,,805088,1010503.103,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,installation of a NaOCl system for Sir Adam Beck SAB#2,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2439,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,New York,Buchanan,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,300000,,,376543.8447,376543.8447,300000,376543.8447,376543.8447,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,NaOCl system installation,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2443,TC,Phillips_etal2005,Potential economic impacts of Zebra mussels on the hydropower facilities in the Columbia River basin,Phillips S.; Darland T. & Sytsma M,"The  purpose  of  this  study  was  to  estimate  costs  to  the  Federal  Columbia  River  Power  System hydroelectric projects in the event of a zebra mussel infestation. We   estimated   hydropower   maintenance   costs   associated   with   zebra   mussels   by   examining  the  Bonneville  Dam  First  Powerhouse,  costs  associated  with  Asian  clam  (Corbicula fluminea) control at Bonneville, and a survey of zebra mussel mitigation costs at other hydropower generation facilities in North America. We   found   that   the   one-time   cost   for   installing   zebra   mussel   control   systems   at   hydroelectric  projects  could  range  from  the  hundreds  of  thousands  of  dollars  to  over  a  million dollars per facility.  The estimated cost for a hypothetical zebra mussel mitigation strategy,  based  upon  two  response  scenarios  (a  sodium  hypochlorite  (NaOCl)  injection  system and anti-fouling paint), at 13 select hydroelectric projects, was $23,621,000.  The cost per generator was $62,599 for the NaOCl system, and $81,000 for antifouling paint (not including labor).  Removal, painting, sandblasting and installation could potentially double antifouling paint treatment costs.  We estimated that if a NaOCl system was installed at an “average” size Columbia River Basin facility, assuming intermittent use, annual operating costs would likely not exceed $100,000.    Operating  costs  will  vary  depending  on  the  facility,  degree  of  infestation,  environmental permits, etc. This  investigation  found  that  once  utilities  initiate  long-term  mussel  control  programs,  they usually become part of routine maintenance at annual, biennial, or longer intervals, depending on how rapidly the mussels recolonize the systems.   A detailed management plan is needed to determine the best zebra mussel mitigation and control strategy for the FCRPS. The management plan should detail key agency contacts and  coordination;  control  technologies;  permit  requirements;  costs  for  the  hydroelectric  and nuclear facilities, transportation, upstream and downstream fish passage system; and the  environmental  impacts  of  likely  mitigation  technologies.  Engineers,  biologists  and  other  relevant  experts  with  hands-on  experience  in  developing  zebra  mussel  mitigation  strategies should be sought out and utilized.  ",2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,11,N,North America,USA,Tennessee,Cheatham,Site,1993,Year,1993,Unspecified,1999,1999,Potentially ongoing,33333.5,11111,55556,41838.41416,41838.41416,33333.5,41838.41416,41838.41416,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,Automated chlorine injection in cheatham dam,Phillip Haubrock,
SC2444,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Guam,Guam,Site,2000,Year,2000,2004,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1423458.672,,1000000,1423458.672,,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2445,GS,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2000,Year,2000,2004,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,1600000,,,2277533.875,,1600000,2277533.875,,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2447,,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,Mack2000,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,USA,Country,2000,Year,2000,2004,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,1000000000,,,1423458672,,1000000000,1423458672,,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2448,,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,Mack2000,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,USA,Country,2000,Year,2000,2004,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,11000000,,,15658045.39,,11000000,15658045.39,,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2450,,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,Mack2000,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Lythraceae,Lythrum,Lythrum salicaria,,Purple loosestrife,Semi-Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,USA,Country,2000,Year,2000,2004,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,45000000,,,64055640.24,,45000000,64055640.24,,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control/Damage-Loss/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2452,,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,Mack2000,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,USA,Country,2000,Year,2000,2004,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,600000000,,,854075203.3,,600000000,854075203.3,,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2453,,86,Environmental and Economic Costs of Nonindigenous Species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2000,English,Peer-reviewed article,Mack2000,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hymenoptera,Formicidae,Solenopsis,Solenopsis invicta,,Red Imported Fire Ant,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,USA,Country,2000,Year,2000,2004,2000,2000,Potentially ongoing,400000000,,,569383468.8,,400000000,569383468.8,,USD,2000,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders/Unspecified,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2455,,Bangsund1991b,Economic impacts of leafy spurge on grazing lands in the northern Great Plains,Bangsund & Leistritz,,1991,English,Official report,Bangsund1993,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Malpighiales,Euphorbiaceae,Euphorbia,Euphorbia esula,,leafy spurge,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,rangeland and pastures (i.e. grazing lands),4,N,North America,USA,Wyoming,Wyoming,Site,1990,Year,1990,1990,1990,1990,One-time,5300000,,,9942984.565,,5300000,9942984.565,,USD,1990,Effective,Observed,Extrapolation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Marina Golivets,
SC2456,,DK21,Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States.,"Aukema, J.D., Leung, B., Kovacks, K., Chivers, C., Britton, KO., Englin, J., Rrankel, SJ. Haight, RG., Holmes, TP., Liebhold, AM., et al.",,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Coleoptera,Buprestidae,Agrilus,Agrilus planipennis,,emerald ash borer,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forest,1,N,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2003-2012,Period,2003,2012,2003,2012,Potentially ongoing,38000000,,,43416959.17,,38000000,43416959.17,,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,SC2449(SC2450),no,This is federal government expenditures across all agencies,Andrew Kramer,
SC2461,,DK21,Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States.,"Aukema, J.D., Leung, B., Kovacks, K., Chivers, C., Britton, KO., Englin, J., Rrankel, SJ. Haight, RG., Holmes, TP., Liebhold, AM., et al.",,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Hemiptera,Adelgidae,Adelges,Adelges tsugae,,hemlock wooly adelgid,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forest,1,N,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2009,Period,2000,2009,2000,2009,Potentially ongoing,4300000,,,4912971.695,,4300000,4912971.695,,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,SC2454(SC2455),no,This is federal government expenditures across all agencies,Andrew Kramer,
SC2466,,DK21,Economic impacts of non-native forest insects in the continental United States.,"Aukema, J.D., Leung, B., Kovacks, K., Chivers, C., Britton, KO., Englin, J., Rrankel, SJ. Haight, RG., Holmes, TP., Liebhold, AM., et al.",,2011,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,Forest,1,N,North America,USA,,Unspecified,Country,2000-2009,Period,1998,2007,1998,2007,Potentially ongoing,33000000,,,37704201.38,,33000000,37704201.38,,USD,2009,Effective,Observed,Report/estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control/Research/Surveillance,Management_costs,Mixed,High,,,,SC2459(SC2460),no,This is federal government expenditures across all agencies,Andrew Kramer,
SC2486,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Guam,Guam,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1255146.149,,1000000,1255146.149,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2487,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,1600000,,,2008233.838,,1600000,2008233.838,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2488,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Guam,Guam,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,1000000,,,1255146.149,,1000000,1255146.149,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2489,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Guam,Guam,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,25000,,,31378.65372,,25000,31378.65372,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2490,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Reptilia,Squamata,Colubridae,Boiga,Boiga irregularis,,Brown tree snake,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Guam,Guam,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,2000000,,,2510292.298,,2000000,2510292.298,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Research,Management_costs,Knowledge/funding,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2491,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Passeriformes,Sturnidae,Sturnus,Sturnus vulgaris,,Common starling,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,800000000,,,1004116919,,800000000,1004116919,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2496,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,10000000,,,12551461.49,,10000000,12551461.49,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2497,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Canidae,Canis,Canis lupus,,Dog,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,250000000,,,313786537.2,,250000000,313786537.2,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2498,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Felidae,Felis,Felis catus,,Feral Cat,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,17000000000,,,21337484532,,17000000000,21337484532,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2499,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,Y,,,,Oceania/Pacific Islands,USA,Hawaii,Hawaii,Unit (Park),2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,450000,,,564815.767,,450000,564815.767,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2500,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Artiodactyla,Suidae,Sus,Sus scrofa,,Feral pig,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,800000000,,,1004116919,,800000000,1004116919,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2503,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Blattodea,Rhinotermitidae,Coptotermes,Coptotermes formosanus,,Formosan termite,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,USA,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,1000000000,,,1255146149,,1000000000,1255146149,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2504,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Arthropoda,Insecta,Lepidoptera,Erebidae,Lymantria,Lymantria dispar,,Gypsy moth,Terrestrial,terrestrial,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,USA,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,11000000,,,13806607.64,,11000000,13806607.64,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2506,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Mammalia,Carnivora,Herpestidae,Herpestes,Herpestes edwardsi,,Indian mongoose,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,Central America/Oceania/Pacific islands,USA,"Puerto Rico, Hawaii","Puerto Rico, Hawaii",Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,50000000,,,62757307.45,,50000000,62757307.45,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Agriculture/Environment/Health,Damage-Loss,Damage_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2514,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,none available,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Myrtaceae,Melaleuca,Melaleuca quinquenervia,,melaleuca tree,Terrestrial,semi-aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Florida,Florida,Site,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,4500000,,,5648157.67,,4500000,5648157.67,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Management,Management_costs,Unspecified,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2515,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Chordata,Aves,Columbiformes,Columbidae,Columba,Columba livia,,Pigeon,Terrestrial,terrestrial,,,,,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,Unspecified,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,1100000000,,,1380660764,,1100000000,1380660764,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Authorities-Stakeholders,Control,Management_costs,Post-invasion_management,High,,,,,no,,Christophe Diagne/Claire Assailly/Lise Nuninger,Yes
SC2516,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Plantae,Tracheophyta,Magnoliopsida,Myrtales,Lythraceae,Lythrum,Lythrum salicaria,,Purple loosestrife,Semi-Aquatic,semi-aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,USA,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,45000000,,,56481576.7,,45000000,56481576.7,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Environment,Control/Damage-Loss/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,
SC2519,WoS,13244,Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States,Pimentel et al,,2005,English,Peer-reviewed article,NA,Yes,Animalia,Mollusca,Bivalvia,Myida,Dreissenidae,Dreissena,Dreissena polymorpha,,Zebra mussel,Aquatic,aquatic,N,NA,,N,North America,USA,Diverse/Unspecified,New York,Country,2005,Year,2005,Unspecified,2005,2005,Potentially ongoing,1000000000,,,1255146149,,1000000000,1255146149,,USD,2005,Publication year,Observed,Report/Estimation,Public and social welfare,Damage-Loss/Management,Mixed_costs,NA,High,,,,,no,,Jean Fantle-Lepczyk,