Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe.

Haubrock, Phillip J. , Turbelin, Anna J., Cuthbert, Ross N. , Novoa, Ana , Taylor, Nigel G., Angulo, Elena , Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana , Bodey, Thomas W., Capinha, César , Diagne, Christophe , Essl, Franz, Golivets, Marina, Kirichenko, Natalia , Kourantidou, Melina , Leroy, Boris, Renault, David , Verbrugge, Laura and Courchamp, Franck (2021) Economic costs of invasive alien species across Europe. Open Access NeoBiota, 67 . pp. 153-190. DOI 10.3897/neobiota.67.58196.

[thumbnail of NB_article_58196_en_1.pdf]
Preview
Text
NB_article_58196_en_1.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Supplementary data:

Abstract

Biological invasions continue to threaten the stability of ecosystems and societies that are dependent on their services. Whilst the ecological impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) have been widely reported in recent decades, there remains a paucity of information concerning their economic impacts. Europe has strong trade and transport links with the rest of the world, facilitating hundreds of IAS incursions, and largely centralised decision-making frameworks. The present study is the first comprehensive and detailed effort that quantifies the costs of IAS collectively across European countries and examines temporal trends in these data. In addition, the distributions of costs across countries, socioeconomic sectors and taxonomic groups are examined, as are socio-economic correlates of management and damage costs. Total costs of IAS in Europe summed to US$140.20 billion (or €116.61 billion) between 1960 and 2020, with the majority (60%) being damage-related and impacting multiple sectors. Costs were also geographically widespread but dominated by impacts in large western and central European countries, i.e. the UK, Spain, France, and Germany. Human population size, land area, GDP, and tourism were significant predictors of invasion costs, with management costs additionally predicted by numbers of introduced species, research effort and trade. Temporally, invasion costs have increased exponentially through time, with up to US$23.58 billion (€19.64 billion) in 2013, and US$139.56 billion (€116.24 billion) in impacts extrapolated in 2020. Importantly, although these costs are substantial, there remain knowledge gaps on several geographic and taxonomic scales, indicating that these costs are severely underestimated. We, thus, urge increased and improved cost reporting for economic impacts of IAS and coordinated international action to prevent further spread and mitigate impacts of IAS populations.

Document Type: Article
Keywords: Bodiversity; European Union; InvaCost; monetary impacts; non-native biota; socio-economic correlates; socioeconomic sectors
Research affiliation: HGF-UFZ
OceanRep > GEOMAR > FB3 Marine Ecology > FB3-EOE-B Experimental Ecology - Benthic Ecology
Woods Hole
Main POF Topic: PT6: Marine Life
Refereed: Yes
Open Access Journal?: Yes
Publisher: Pensoft
Date Deposited: 30 Jul 2021 08:54
Last Modified: 07 Feb 2024 15:37
URI: https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/53641

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item