Mengis, Nadine and Matthews, H. Damon (2020) Non-CO2 forcing changes will likely decrease the remaining carbon budget for 1.5°C. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 3 (1). Art.Nr. 19. DOI 10.1038/s41612-020-0123-3.

Preview	Text s41612-020-0123-3.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0. Download (793kB) | Preview
Preview	Text 41612_2020_123_MOESM1_ESM.pdf - Supplemental Material Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0. Download (283kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Pressemitteilung) pm_2020_23_climateforcing-d.pdf - Other Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0. Download (130kB) | Preview
Preview	Text (Press release) pm_2020_23_climateforcing-e-1.pdf - Other Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0. Download (401kB) | Preview

Abstract

One key contribution to the wide range of 1.5 degrees C carbon budgets among recent studies is the non-CO2 climate forcing scenario uncertainty. Based on a partitioning of historical non-CO2 forcing, we show that currently there is a net negative non-CO2 forcing from fossil fuel combustion (FFC), and a net positive non-CO2 climate forcing from land-use change (LUC) and agricultural activities. We perform a set of future simulations in which we prescribed a 1.5 degrees C temperature stabilisation trajectory, and diagnosed the resulting 1.5 degrees C carbon budgets. Using the historical partitioning, we then prescribed adjusted non-CO2 forcing scenarios consistent with our model's simulated decrease in FFC CO2 emissions. We compared the diagnosed carbon budgets from these adjusted scenarios to those resulting from the default RCP scenario's non-CO2 forcing, and to a scenario in which proportionality between future CO2 and non-CO2 forcing is assumed. We find a wide range of carbon budget estimates across scenarios, with the largest budget emerging from the scenario with assumed proportionality of CO2 and non-CO2 forcing. Furthermore, our adjusted-RCP scenarios produce carbon budgets that are smaller than the corresponding default RCP scenarios. Our results suggest that ambitious mitigation scenarios will likely be characterised by an increasing contribution of non-CO2 forcing, and that an assumption of continued proportionality between CO2 and non-CO2 forcing would lead to an overestimate of the remaining carbon budget. Maintaining such proportionality under ambitious fossil fuel mitigation would require mitigation of non-CO2 emissions at a rate that is substantially faster than found in the standard RCP scenarios.

Actions (login required)

View Item