Co-developing the IPCC frequently asked questions as an effective science communication tool.

Connors, Sarah L., Nicolai, Maike, Berger, Sophie, Pidcock, Rosalind, Walsh, Melissa and Hawtin, Nigel (2022) Co-developing the IPCC frequently asked questions as an effective science communication tool. Open Access Climatic Change, 171 (1-2). Art.Nr. 10. DOI 10.1007/s10584-021-03248-0.

[thumbnail of Connors2022.pdf]
Preview
Text
Connors2022.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[thumbnail of 10584_2021_3248_MOESM1_ESM.pdf]
Preview
Text
10584_2021_3248_MOESM1_ESM.pdf - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0.

Download (723kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of Supplementary material 2] Other (Supplementary material 2)
10584_2021_3248_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx - Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0.

Download (95kB)

Supplementary data:

Abstract

In its Sixth Assessment Report Cycle (AR6), the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) aims to strengthen the communication of its products. As the only mandatory part of IPCC reports specifically targeting a lay audience, the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) provide an opportunity for broader communication of key IPCC topics. AR6 has released three Special Reports that include FAQs, varying in number and structure, as well as the approach taken to develop them. Using these Special Report FAQs, in this essay, we take stock of current efforts to co-develop IPCC FAQs and provide recommendations to strengthen the impact of these highly useful yet currently under-utilised resources. Building on evidence from a user survey, text analysis and social media statistics, we find that bringing together IPCC authors and communication specialists to jointly develop the text and graphics increases the accessibility and usefulness of the FAQs. Efforts made for informative visuals additionally increase their impact on social media. To maximise the potential and impact of the IPCC FAQs, we recommend involving communication experts from the beginning of the drafting process to share responsibility, which requires sufficient resources to be allocated to the FAQs. We also suggest developing common FAQ guidelines across Working Groups so future assessment reports can ensure all FAQs are an effective and useful tool for IPCC communication.

We also hope that other scientific institutions and projects that wish to summarise scientific content for diverse audiences can benefit from our lessons learned.

Document Type: Article
Keywords: IPCC; Climate change; Science communication; Frequently asked question; FAQ; Science writing
Research affiliation: OceanRep > GEOMAR > D-DIR Directorate > D-KM Kommunikation und Medien
HGF-AWI
Main POF Topic: PT2: Ocean and Cryosphere
Refereed: Yes
Open Access Journal?: No
Publisher: Springer
Date Deposited: 31 Mar 2022 07:50
Last Modified: 14 Feb 2024 13:50
URI: https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/55633

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item